Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
On
By
Deepak Pandey
B. Tech 3rd Year
Applied Petroleum Engineering (Specialization in Gas)
University of Petroleum & Energy Studies
Dehradun (248001)
Under Guidance
Of
It is to certify that the project entitled, HDPE Plant Overview & Design of Heat
Exchanger was completed by Mr. Deepak Pandey under my guidance during
the period w.e.f. 1st July 2014 to 31st July 2014. The same is hereby approved.
Acknowledgement
Table of Contents
1.2.
PANIPAT PETROCHEMICALS................................................................................. 9
Introduction .................................................................................................................... 12
2.2.
2.3.
2.4.
2.5.
2.6.
2.6.
2.7.
3.2.
3.3.
3.4.
4.2.
Assumptions ............................................................................................................... 35
4.3.
Calculations ................................................................................................................ 35
4.4.
4.5.
Conclusion................................................................................................................................. 43
List of Figures
Capacity and yield improvement revamp was also carried out in existing CCRU and FCC units
in 2008 for improving profitability.
Meeting Socio-Statutory Regulation: Euro III and Euro IV
To meet socially-statutory regulations and environmental standards the Refinery was required to
produce Euro III/IV quality MS. Therefore the MSQ project consisting of PENEX
(Isomerization) 400 TMTPA, Naphtha Hydrotreater Unit 410 TMTPA, Reformate Splitter -470
TMTPA and FCC Casolice Desulphurization- 370 TMTPA was approved at a cost of 1131
crores INR, completed and commissioned in November, 2009. Panipat Refinery is Indian oils
first refinery to produce Euro III/IV MS.
From 12 MMTPA to 15 MMTPA
The refining capacity of Panipat Refinery was enhanced from 12 MMTPA to 15 MMTPA in
November, 2010. The expansion will enable processing of 3 MMTPA High Sulphur Crude. The
expansion will also enable producing Euro-III / IV Quality HSD.
The capacity revamp included Crude and Vacuum Distillation Units (CDU/VDU-I) from 6.0to
7.5 MMPTA, Once through Hydro cracking Unit (OHCU) from 1.7 to 1.9 MMPTA ,Delayed
coking Unit (DCU) from 2.4 to 3.0 MMTPA, Amine Regeneration Unit (ARU) from 296 M3 /
hr. to 400 M3/ hr.
Other jobs included installation of second stage reactors in the diesel Hydro-treating Unit
(DHDT); installation of New sour Water Strippers (SWS and additional train of sulphur recovery
Unit ( SRU) with Tail Gas Treating Unit (TGTU). Augmentation storage-two LPG mounded
bullets, 2 Naphtha, MS Tanks, one DHDT feed tank, utilities new Cooling Towers, Sub-stations
and offsite piping was also carried out.
Products dispatch
The Petroleum products from the Refinery are transported through various modes Rail, Road as
well as Environment-friendly pipelines. The LPG produced from the Refinery is pumped through
a dedicated pipeline to Indian Oils Kohand Bottling Plant where bottling and bulk dispatch are
done. The LPG is further transported to Jalandhar through a cross country pipeline,
commissioned in April2009.
800
350
600
300
300
300,000 (TPA Each)
The Naphtha cracker is the largest process unit with a capacity to produce 800000 TPA Ethylene,
650000 TPA Propylene for downstream polymer units. With state-of- the art technology
licensed by CBI Lummis USA and constructed by Tokyo Japan and L&T, the unit also produces
Benzene and other blending streams for the Refinery. A Plant for extraction of Butadiene is
under construction for supply of butadiene as feed to the upcoming emulsified styrene Butadiene
Rubber ESBR joint venture.
Downstream Units
Ethylene is the feedstock for downstream polymer with Swing Unit and HDPE unit for
producing various grades of ploy ethylene polymers. It is also the feedstock for MEG unit which
mainly produces MEG along with DEG and TEG by products.
Quality Assurance and Business Development
To assure quality, propel development and evaluation of new application and new grades of
polymers, Panipat Naphtha Cracker has a Quality Control Laboratory with world class state of
the art instruments and a Product Application and Development center PADC, testing Petroleum
and polymer testing.
Manned by personnel with experience of leading petrochemical companies , the PADC has a
total of four laboratories. Out of them, two polymer processing laboratories have machines
which predict the performance of polymer grades in market by converting them into finished
products like films, molded articles, pipes, storage tanks, blow molded jerry cans, specialty
compounds, etc.
The other two are polymer testing and characterization laboratories with sophisticated equipment
for testing of physical, chemical, weathering, thermal, optical, environmental properties of
polymer raw material as well as finished products.
Products from Naphtha Cracker Complex
The polymers products from the naphtha cracker comprise of LLDPE, HDPE, polypropylene, the
petrochemical/chemical feed stocks are MEG, DEG and BENZENE. Niche grades from the
polypropylene unit include high speed BOPP (biaxial oriented polypropylene) which is used for
food packaging, lamination, etc. high clarity random copolymer used for making food containers,
thin walled products and super impact copolymer grades used for batteries, automobile parts,
luggage, heavy duty transport containers etc. Applications of LLDPE include multilayer film for
packaging, milk packing, water storage tanks and road barriers etc. HDPE is used for making
bins and crates, pipes and pipe coating, woven sack bags, mosquito nets, containers, shopping
bags, containers /bottles for packaging of oil, cosmetics etc.
Mono ethylene glycol the main products with diethyl glycol and tri ethyl glycol as by products
are hygroscopic and have the largest application in the manufacture of the polyesters (PSF, PFY,
10
POY, PET files and bottle grade resin). It has various ranges of applications like explosives,
cosmetics, printing ink, anti-freeze and coolant in automobiles etc. MEG is also used as
stabilizers against gel formation.
Benzene is used for production of detergents, pesticides, solvents, paints & varnishes, adhesives,
in rubber processing etc.
Dispatch of Products
The polymer warehouse at Panipat Asias biggest warehouse is 740 M in length and 80M wide to
accommodate around 55000 MTs of polymer grades packed in 25 kg PP woven sack bags. It has
15 online bagging and pelletizing machines, each with a capacity to bag 1200 bags of 25 kg each
per hour. In addition, it has 50 loading bays and two independent battery charging rooms to
support continuous fork-lift operations.
The PTA warehouse 428m in length and 100m wide has a storage capacity of 50,000 tons and
handles about 18,000 tons per day. There are 50 fork lifts, 2 silos of 3000 tons each and 3
bagging machines capable of bagging 60 tons per hour with 12 loading points. There is a
container siding near the warehouse for rail movement.
Adequately trained manpower in bagging operations, warehouse management and intricacies of
supply chain management coupled with excellent display and tracking system ensures right
grades reach the right customers. Indian Oils contract with Container Corporation of India Ltd.
(CONCOR) for movement of PTA and polymer is also leveraged to reach the product to
container.
11
2.2.
Annual production capacity: 300,000 tons / year of High Density Polyethylene resin
based on a product mix of Bimodal HDPE resins, Broad MWD HDPE resins and Narrow
MWD HDPE resins.
Polymerization Single Line having two reactors and one post reactor in series.
Design operating hours per year: 8,000 (including transition time)
Turndown: The plant will operate at 50 % turndown except the pelletization section,
which would have around 65% turndown.
Catalyst Used: THE, THB, THT and Z501. THE, THB and THT catalysts are nonstoichiometric solid state compounds with varying proportion of Magnesium and
Titanium Chloride. These catalysts are prepared in plant. Z501 is supplied readymade by
BASELL (Ferrara Italy or Frankfurt Germany) and can be used after diluting in
hexane.
Layout of HDPE Plant
2.3.
2.4.
flash vessel V-1201 together with the gas leaving R-1204 is sent to the pressure controller
to the condenser E-1303. The gas leaving the condenser is sent to the scrubbing tower C3201, while condensed liquid is discharged to decanter feed vessel V-1301.
15
nitrogen temperature in the dryer. The dried HDPE powder is pneumatically conveyed to
the powder purification unit. The drying nitrogen forms a close circuit.
transport nitrogen circuit. The HDPE powder is fed to powder treatment vessel-2301 via
rotary feeder MR-2301 which also serves as a gas lock. The powder flows through the
silo in a plug flow, counter current to the flow of hot nitrogen used to remove the residual
hexane. Slightly super-heated stream is added to the nitrogen to destroy the catalyst
residues in HDPE powder. The powder has the residence time in rage of hours in the
vessel. The inlet temperature of nitrogen should be greater than 100C in order to avoid
the condensation of steam.
consisting predominantly of ethylene and ethane and traces of hexane is sent to cracker
gas compressor unit PK-3501.
19
20
2.2.22. Extruder
The homogeneous mixture from the screw mixture is fed into hopper of the extruder
which is blanketed with nitrogen. The blanketing nitrogen goes to the atmosphere. The
mixture is then molten and thoroughly homogenized in extruder EX-5101. The energy
required by the extruder is mainly introduced by friction provided by the main drive
motor driven screw. The part upstream and downstream of gear pump, which is an
integral part of EX-5101in the extrusion package unit PK-5102 and the gear pump itself
is steam heated. The melt is pressed through the heated die plate by the gear pump. The
HDPE strands are cut to desired length by the rotating blades located in underwater
pelletizer.
Figure 9: Extruder
2.2.23. Pellet Cooling , Drying, Homogenization & Conveying
The pellets are then transported to the pellet dryer S-5101. On the way to the pellet dryer
pellets cool down in the transport water. In the dryer with the integrated agglomerate
separator, the HDPE pellets acre separated from the transport water by centrifugal force
and dried by air suck fans K-5102. The high temperature of pellet supports this drying
process. After leaving dryer S-5103, HDPE pellets pass through the pellet sieve S-5104
and the pellet conveying station ME-5104 by the means of conveying air from the
compressor station. Pellets can also be diverted to the intermediate pellet bin V-5102 for
reprocessing in the extruder EX-5101. In order to compensate for variations in quality of
characteristic values of the product in upstream pelletizing unit, pellets are homogenized
before they are pneumatically fed to the pellet silos in the logistics center. This is done by
homogenizer V-5301 A~G.
22
2.5.
The different steams used in the plant are produced by mixing condensates and steam in
requisite amounts to attain the require degree of saturation.
2.5.4. Ethylene Purification Unit
Ethylene coming from Battery Limits contains traces of water and CO2 and needs to be
purified. These traces are removed in C-7101 A/B by adsorption with molecular sieves.
The purified ethylene is then sent to the filter G-7101 A/B to the polymerization reactors.
These two columns are alternatively in operations and regeneration.
2.5.5. Waste Water Collection
The waste water collection system consists of the collection pits LZ-3401 A/B/C/D/E for
pumping to pretreatment V-3403 inside (HDPE section) and final disposal to battery
limits (B.L) of liquid effluents coming from HDPE section plant. The philosophy of this
system is to collect:
1. Process waste water mainly contaminated with hexane and oil spills, polymer powder
and process waste water coming from column regeneration.
2. Rain water, washing water and firefighting water coming from the potentially
polluted paved areas (HDPE polymerization hexane pumps and wax treatment areas).
The waste water collection system of HDPE section has been made up of the following
basins:
LZ-3401 A Diverting Box
LZ-3401 B Process Waste Water / 1st 15 minutes of Rain water / 1st 5 minutes of
Firefighting water collection basin
LZ-3401 C Clean Rain Water collection basin
LZ-3401 D Hexane Basin (basin design to contain 110 % of the largest vessel)
LZ-3401 E Waste Water Basin
2.6.
Utility Characteristics
Pressure (kg/sq.cm gauge)
Temperature
Name of Utility
MinimumNormal Maximum Minimum Normal Maximum
40
42
44
380
390
400
H.P. Steam
M.P. Steam
15.1
16.3
17.7
270
285
310
3.6
4
4.5
195
200
225
L.P. Steam
0.7
115
L.L.P. Steam
4.5
5
5.5
28
33
Cooling Water
2.2
2.8
3
< 45
45
45
Cooling Water
4
7.5
8
30
40
50
DM Water
3
5
6
Ambient
Service Water
8
8
12
Ambient Ambient
Fire Water
6
36
Jacket Water
5.5
46
Jacket Water
6.5
7
Instrumen Air
6
7
8
40
50
Plant Air
4
6
7
40
Nitrogen
2.7.
Ethylene
Butene - 1
Hydrogen
Catalyst
Co-Catalyst
Calcium Stearate
Irganox
38040
122
25.6
4.4
6.8
67.8
6.8
PE Pellets
(ex Extruder)
Wax
Tail Gas -1
Tail Gas -2
37676
Loss / Unaccounted
6.4
Total
38273.4
Total
38273.4
25
151
383
57
3.1.
The prime objective in the design of an exchanger is to determine the surface area required
for the specified duty (rate of heat transfer) using the temperature difference available. The
overall coefficient is the reciprocal of the overall resistance to heat transfer, which is the
sum of several individual resistances. For heat exchanger across a typical heat exchanger
tube the relationship between the overall coefficient and the individual coefficients, which
are the reciprocal of the individual resistances, is given by:
26
Uo = the overall coefficient based on the outside area of the tube, W/m 2 oC.
ho = outside fluid film coefficient, W/m 2 oC.
hi = inside fluid film coefficient, W/m 2 oC.
hod = outside dirt coefficient (fouling factor), W/m 2 oC.
hid = inside dirt coefficient, W/m2 oC.
kw = thermal conductivity of the tube wall material, W/m oC.
di = tube inside diameter, m.
do = tube outside diameter, m.
The magnitude of the individual coefficient will depend on the nature of the heat-transfer process
(conduction, convection, condensation, boiling or radiation), on the physical properties of the
fluids, on the fluid flow-rates, and on the physical arrangement of the heat transfer surface. As
the physical layout of the exchanger cannot be determined until the area is know the design of an
exchanger is of necessity a trial and error procedure.
3.2. Design Specifications of Different Components of Shell & Tube Heat Exchanger
3.2.1. Tubes
Tube diameters in the range 58 in. (16 mm) to 2 in. (50 mm) are used. The smaller
diameters 58 to 1 in. (16 to 25 mm) are preferred for most duties, as they will give more
compact, and therefore cheaper, exchangers. Larger tubes are easier to clean by
mechanical methods and would be selected for heavily fouling fluids.
The tube thickness (gauge) is selected to withstand the internal pressure and give an
adequate corrosion allowance. Steel tubes for heat exchangers are covered by BS
3606(metric sizes); the standards applicable to other materials are given in BS 3274.The
preferred lengths of tubes for heat exchangers are: 6 ft. (1.83 m), 8 ft. (2.44 m), 12 ft.
(3.66 m), 16 ft. (4.88 m) 20 ft. (6.10 m), 24 ft. (7.32 m). For a given surface area, the use
of longer tubes will reduce the shell diameter; which will generally result in a lower cost
exchanger, particularly for high shell pressures. The optimum tube length to shell
diameter will usually fall within the range of 5 to 10.
If U-tubes are used, the tubes on the outside of the bundle will be longer than those on the
inside. The average length needs to be estimated for use in the thermal design. U-tubes
will be bent from standard tube lengths and cut to size. The tube size is often determined
by the plant maintenance department standards, as clearly it is an advantage to reduce the
number of sizes that have to be held in stores for tube replacement. in. (19 mm) is a good
trial diameter with which to start design calculations.
27
at the expense of a higher pressure drop than the square pattern. A square, or rotated
square arrangement, is used for heavily fouling fluids, where it is necessary to
mechanically clean the outside of the tubes. The recommended tube pitch (distance
between tube centers) is 1.25 times the tube outside diameter; and this will normally be
used unless process requirements dictate otherwise. Where a square pattern is used for
ease of cleaning, the recommended minimum clearance between the tubes is 0.25 in. (6.4
mm).
3.2.3. Shells
The British standard BS 3274 covers exchangers from 6 in. (150 mm) to 42 in. (1067
mm) diameter; and the TEMA standards, exchangers up to 60 in. (1520 mm). Up to about
24 in. (610 mm) shells are normally constructed from standard, close tolerance, pipe;
above 24 in. (610 mm) they are rolled from plate. The shell diameter must be selected to
give as close a fit to the tube bundle as is practical; to reduce bypassing round the outside
of the bundle.
3.2.4. Baffles
Baffles are used in the shell to direct the fluid stream across the tubes, to increase the
fluid velocity and so improve the rate of transfer. The most commonly used type of baffle
is the single segmental baffle.
3.2.5. Support Plates & Tie Rod
Where segmental baffles are used some will be fabricated with closer tolerances, 164 in.
to act as support plates. For condensers and vaporizers, where baffles are not needed for
heat-transfer purposes, a few will be installed to support the tubes. The minimum spacing
to be used for support plates are given in the standards. The spacing ranges from around 1
m for 16 mm tubes to 2 m for 25 mm tubes. The baffles and support plate are held
together with tie rods and spacers. The number of rods required will depend on the shell
diameter, and will range from 4, 16 mm diameter rods, for exchangers under 380 mm
diameter; to 8, 12.5 mm rods, for exchangers of 1 m diameter.
3.3.
Tlm
and S=
R is equal to the shell-side fluid flow-rate times the fluid mean specific heat; divided by the
tube-side fluid flow-rate times the tube-side fluid specific heat. S is a measure of the
temperature efficiency of the exchanger. For a 2shell pass exchanger, the correction factor is
given by
Ft =
2. Fouling: The fluid that has the greatest tendency to foul the heat-transfer surfaces should
be placed in the tubes. This will give better control over the design fluid velocity and the
higher allowable velocity in the tubes will reduce fouling. Also, the tubes will be easier
to clean.
3. Fluid temperature: if the temp. are high enough to require the use of special alloys
placing the higher temp fluid in the tubes will reduce the overall cost.
4. Operating pressure: The higher pressure stream should be allotted to the tube-side.
High pressure tubes will be cheaper than a high-pressure shell.
5. Pressure drop: for the same pressure drop, higher heat transfer coefficient will be
obtained on the tube-side than the shell-side, and fluid with the lowest allowable pressure
drop should be allocated to the tube-side.
6. Viscosity: generally, a higher heat transfer coefficient will be obtained by allocating the
more viscous material to the shell side, providing the flow is turbulent.
7. Stream flow-rate: allocating the fluids with the lowest flow-rate to the shell-side will
normally give the economical design.
3.3.3. Shell and Tube Side Velocities
High velocities will give high heat transfer coefficients but also a high-pressure drop. The
velocity must be high enough to prevent any suspended solids setting, but not so high as to
cause erosion. High velocities will reduce fouling.
Typical design velocities are given below:
Liquids
Tube-side, process fluids: 1 to 2 m/s, maximum 4 m/s if required to reduce fouling: water:
1.5 to 2.5 m/s
Shell- side: 0.3 to 1 m/s
Pressure drop
In many applications the pressure drop available to drive the fluids through the exchanger
will be set by the process conditions, and the available pressure drop will vary few milli bars
in vacuum service to several bars in pressure system
When the designer is free to select the pressure drop an economic analysis can be made to
determine the exchanger design which gives the lowest cost, taking into consideration both
capital and pumping costs.
The value suggested below can be used as general guide, and will normally give designs that
are near the optimum.
Liquids
Viscosity
< 1mNs/m2
35 KN/m2
1 to 10 1mNs/m2
50-70 KN/m2
When a high pressure drop is utilized, care must be taken to ensure that the resulting high
fluid velocity does not cause erosion or flow induced tube vibration.
30
3.3.4. Tube Side Heat Transfer Coefficient and Pressure Drop (Single Phase)
There are two major sources of pressure loss on the tube-side of a shell and tube exchanger:
the friction loss in the tubes and the losses due to the sudden contraction and expansion and
flow reversals that the fluid experiences in flow through the tube arrangement. The tube
friction loss can be calculated using the familiar equations for pressure-drop loss in pipes.
The basic equation for isothermal flow in pipes (constant temperature) is:
P= 8jf ( ) ui2
Where jf is the dimensionless friction factor and L is the effective pipe length.
m = 0.25 for laminar flow, Re < 2100,
m = 0.14 for turbulent flow, Re > 2100.
Another source of pressure drop will be the flow expansion and contraction at the exchanger
inlet and outlet nozzles. This can be estimated by adding one velocity head for the inlet and
0.5 for the outlet, based on the nozzle velocities.
3.3.5. Shell Side Heat Transfer Co-efficient and Pressure Drop (Single Phase)
The flow pattern in the shell of a segmentally baffled heat exchanger is complex, and this
makes the prediction of the shell-side heat-transfer coefficient and pressure drop very much
more difficult than for the tube-side. Though the baffles are installed to direct the flow
across the tubes, the actual flow of the main stream of fluid will be a mixture of cross flow
between the baffles, coupled with axial (parallel) flow in the baffle windows.
The complex flow pattern on the shell-side, and the great number of variables involved,
make it difficult to predict the shell-side coefficient and pressure drop with complete
assurance. In methods used for the design of exchangers prior to about 1960 no attempt was
made to account for the leakage and bypass streams. Correlations were based on the total
stream flow, and empirical methods were used to account for the performance of real
exchangers compared with that for cross flow over ideal tube banks. Typical of these bulkflow methods are those of Kern (1950) and Donohue (1955).
The Engineering Sciences Data Unit has also published a method for estimating shell side
the pressure drop and heat transfer coefficient, EDSU Design Guide 83038 (1984). The
method is based on a simplification of Tinkers work. It can be used for hand calculations,
but as iterative procedures are involved it is best programmed for use with personal
computers.
31
3.4.
Kerns Method
This method was based on experimental work on commercial exchangers with standard
tolerances and will give a reasonably satisfactory prediction of the heat-transfer
coefficient for standard designs. The prediction of pressure drop is less satisfactory, as
pressure drop is more affected by leakage and bypassing than heat transfer. The shell-side
heat transfer and friction factors are correlated in a similar manner to those for tube-side
flow by using a hypothetical shell velocity and shell diameter. As the cross-sectional area
for flow will vary across the shell diameter, the linear and mass velocities are based on
the maximum area for cross-flow: that at the shell equator. The shell equivalent diameter
is calculated using the flow area between the tubes taken in the axial direction (parallel to
the tubes) and the wetted perimeter of the tubes.
32
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
33
4.2.Assumptions
According to Richardson & Coulson, there are 2 values of overall heat transfer
coefficient, U for Jacket Water at Tube Side depending on the nature of fluid on the
shell side.
1. For light organic solvent, value of U is in the range of 200 300 W/m2C.
2. For aqueous solutions or DM Water, the value of U is in the range of 200 500
W/m2C.
Therefore in this heat exchanger designing we are going to assume the value of U and
then through iterations we can check whether the calculated U is close to assumed U
or not. The assumed value of U for this design is
U (overall heat transfer coefficient) = 500 W/m2C
4.3.
Calculations
= 18.97145 oC
R=
S=
= 3.75
= 0.137931
35
= 27.11763 m2
36
=
= 0.005591 m3/s
Now,
Tube side velocity =
=
= 0.489641 m/s
4.3.5. Bundle and shell diameter
Pitch (P) = 1.25 x 19 = 23.75
From table 12.4 in Richardson & Coulson two shell pass exchanger has:
k1 = 0.249 and n1 = 2.207
Therefore bundle diameter is given by
Db = do x
=19
= 0.042659
Now, calculation for shell diameter
Ds = Db + 17
Ds = 0.042659 + 17
= 17.04266 cm
4.3.6. Calculation for Reynoldss Number, Prandtl Number and Nusset Number
Reynoldss no. =
=
37
= 8792.654
Now, calculation for Prandtl Number
Pr =
x 1000
=
= 29.82355
= 842.5091 W/m2 C
4.3.7. Calculation for Baffle Spacing, Volumetric Flow Rate and Shell Side Velocity
Baffle spacing (lb.) = Ds / 5
= 17.042659 / 5
= 3.408532
Now, calculation of sectional flow area of shell
38
4.3.8. Calculation for Reynoldss Number, Prandtl Number and Nusset Number
Reynoldss no. =
=
= 74065.71
39
x 1000
=
= 4.352926
From the Richardson & Coulson graph, the value of correcting factor jh is 0.0037.
Now, calculation for Nusset Number
Nusset Number (Nu) = jh x Re x (Pr) 0.33
= 0.0037 x 74065.71 x (4.352926)0.33
= 445.2631
Now, calculation for heat transfer coefficient
Hs =
=
= 13861.92 W/m2 C
4.3.9. Overall heat transfer coefficient
Now finally overall heat transfer coefficient is to be calculated.
= 0.00202
Uo = 495.0748 W/m2 oC
Comparing this result with the assumed result and calculating the percent
deviation we have:
% Error =
40
= 0.985038
This shows that assumed value of overall heat transfer coefficient U = 500 W/m2C is
closed to the calculated value i.e. U = 495.0748 W/m2C.Moreover, the value of overall
heat transfer coefficient U for jacket water is in between 200 to 500 W/m2C.
4.3.10. Pressure Drop Across Tube and Shell Side
The basic equation for isothermal flow in pipes (constant temperature) is:
P= 8jf
ui2
3.75
0.137931
0.68
12.90059
174.9167
27.11763
56.81702
0.000201
0.011418
0.005591
0.489641
Db(bundle dia)
Ds(shell dia)
Reyonlds num(Re)
Pr
L/Di
jh
Nusselt num(Nu)
hi
0.042659
17.04266
8792.654
29.82355
500
0.004
107.8412
842.5091
SHELL
baffle spacing(Lb)
As(in mm2)
As(in m2)
de
volumetric flow rate
shell side velocity
Reyonlds num(Re)
Pr
jh
Nusselt num(Nu)
hs
3.408532
11.61809
0.001162
13.49095
0.002835
2.4402
74065.71
4.352926
0.0037
445.2631
13861.92
overall coefficient
(1/Uo)
Uo
0.00202
495.0748
42
Conclusion
HDPE Plant is one of the units in Panipat Naphtha Cracker Plant. It manufactures different
grades of polyethylene like film grade, pipe grade etc. which poses bimodal properties at the rate
of 300,000 ton per year (900 tons per day). The production specification of plant is 37.5 tons of
HDPE per hour but it is working with the efficiency of 110 % that is it produces 41 tons per hour
manufacturing 900 tons of HDPE a day. The different sections of HDPE Unit are Catalyst
Section, Polymerization Section (also called Reactor Section), Dryer Section, Refrigeration
Section, Hexane Recovery Unit and Extruder. The other facilities inside this plant were Satellite
Sub Stations, Pallet Homogenization & Conveying Section, and Hexane Storage Tanks which
includes Distilled hexane and mother liquor tanks, Intermediate Powder Silos, Effluent Basin,
Jacket Water Additive Dosing, Reactor Cooling Water System and Aluminum Metering System.
The polymerization is done in single phase that is ethylene and butene is reacted in the gaseous
phase and hydrogen is used as the terminator of the reaction. In the first reactor it is controlled
manually and in the second reactor it is controlled automatically by DCS (distributary controller
system) from MCR (main control room). The post reactor is used to provide additional time to
complete the reaction and then the slurry is subjected to decanter feed vessel for the separation of
the lighter & heavier components on the basis of gravity difference. Then the slurry is sent to
decanter centrifuge where by the virtue of centrifugal forces raw HDPE powder and mother
liquor got separated. Mother liquor is sent to ML (mother liquor) storage tank and raw HDPE
powder is sent to the dryer to remove lighter components of the solvent (hexane) from it. Two
fluidized bed dryers are used for the treatment of HDPE powder. The first one works on the
principle of back mixed flow reactor and other one on plug flow type. Here steam and hot
nitrogen flows in the countercurrent fashion in order to evaporate the solvent particles from the
powder. Afterwards through pneumatic dryer these HDPE powders are transported to the PTV
(powder treatment vessel) where the residues of the catalysts are further destroyed by the steam.
Once the powder is completely purified they are sent to extruder for the pelletization process.
Here additives like acid scavengers (calcium stearate and zinc stearate) and anti-oxidants
(IRGAFOX 168 and IRGANOX 100) are added to the HDPE powder. The main purpose for acid
scavengers is to neutralize the effect of bases present in it and anti-oxidants prevent the oxidation
of powder. After dosing the suitable amount of additives in it, the powder is again melted by the
means of screw gear and then sent to the die where the shape and size has been given to the
HDPE pellets. Then the pellets are cooled by the processed water and transported along with it.
Then these pellets are collected in the storage bags with 25kg holding capacity. Besides the
production of HDPE pellets, the plant also recycles and regenerates the hexane and butene by
removing wax from mother liquor. The mother liquor is sent to an evaporator where the vapor of
hexane and butene are removed from wax. The bottom product is wax whereas hexane butene is
the top product. The mixture of hexane & butene is sent to distillation column followed by
43
adsorption column to extract butene which can be used further in the polymerization. The
distilled hexane is stored in hexane tank.
Apart from the plant overview, the design of heat exchanger was given as additional
project from the mentor. The shell & tube exchanger had 2 shell passes and uses jacket water in
tube side and DM water in shell side. Stainless steel was used as the material of construction and
the orientation of tubes is in square patter. The specification of the heat exchanger was given
from the data sheet of the company named BORSELL MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY as per
the MOC: AISI 304 guidelines. A series of 4 iterations has been done to find the correct and less
deviated value of the overall heat transfer coefficient and it should match with the actual heat
exchanger in the plant.
44