Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

8.

Documentary Evidence (Rule 130, Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8)


Macua vs.
Avenido
Dantis vs,
Maghinang
People vs. Alcober
Edsa Shangrila vs.
BF Corporation
Gaw vs. Chua
DECS vs. del
Rosario

GR No.
173540
GR No.
191696
GR No.
192941
GR No.
145842
GR No.
160855
GR No.
146596

22 January
2014
10 April 2013
13 November
2013
27 June 2008
16 April 2008
26 January
2005

9. Parole Evidence Rule (Rule 130, Section 9)


Marquez vs.
Espejo
ACI Phil., Inc. vs.
Coquia
Seaoil Petroleum
Corporation vs.
Autocorp Group

GR No.
168387
GR No.
174466
GR No.
164326

25 August 2010
14 July 2008
17 October
2008

10.

Interpretation of Documents (Rule 130, Sections 10 to 19)

11.

Testimonial Evidence (Rule 130, Sections 20-24)

Qualification of Witnesses
People vs. Obogne GR No.
199740

24 March 2014

Disqualification by Reason of Mental


Incapacity/Immaturity
People vs.
GR No.
2 April 2004
Golimlim
145225
Disqualification by Reason of Death
Sanson vs. Court
GR No.
22 April 2003
of Appeals
127745
Government Privilege
Neri vs. Senate
GR No.
Committee on
180643
Accountability of
Public Officers and

25 March 2008

Investigations
Judicial Privilege
Per Curiam
February 14,
Decision of the
2012
Supreme Court in
connection with
the letter of the
House Prosecution
Panel to
Subpoena Justices
of the Supreme
Court
Privilege Communications (Rule 130, Section
24)
Mercado vs.
AC 5108
26 May 2005
Vitriolo
Marital Communication Privilege
Lutwak vs. United 433 US 604, 1 February
States
73 S. Ct.
1953
481
Adverse Spousal Testimony Privilege
Trammel vs.
445 US 40
27 February
United States
1980
Filial Privilege (Rule 130, Section 25)
People vs.
GR No.
5 March 2003
Invencion
131636

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi