Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
money market instruments. Mutual Funds come under the purview of the Indian Trusts
Act, 1882.
Mutual Funds are ideal investment vehicles for those who are too busy to keep
track of whats happening in the financial markets or do not have the time or resources to
undertake the research needed to make an intelligent investment choice. It is for investors
who appreciate the obvious benefits of liquidity but not at the cost of safety and returns.
These funds can survive and thrive only if they can live up to the hopes and thrust
of their individual members. Mutual funds come to the rescue of those people who do not
excel at stock market due to certain mistakes they commit which can be minimized with
mutual funds. Such mistakes can be viz. lack of sound investments strategies,
unreasonable expectations of making money, untimely decisions of investing or
disinvesting, acting on advice given by others, putting all their eggs in one basket. Mutual
funds come to the rescue of such investors who face following constraints while making
direct investments:
Limited resources in the hands of investors quite often take them away from their
stock markets. Lack of funds forbids investors to have a balanced and diversified
portfolio. Lack of professional knowledge associated with investment business unable
investors to operate gainfully in the market. Small investors can hardly afford to have
expensive investment consultations. To buy shares, investors have to engage share
brokers to whom they have to pay brokerage charges which again adds up to their
expense. It is difficult for them to know the developments taking place in share market
and corporate sector. Allotments by the firm for small investments may not be possible.
There are various investment options available in the investment options in the
stock markets. Bank Fixed Deposits and Post Office schemes regularly come always to
the mind. Because, these were the only options available with us. They offered returns as
well as the ever-important security. If one ever needed to look for other options one could
invest in Corporate Fixed Deposits. With the revival of economy in early 1990's there
was a flurry of NBFC's wooing people and vying for a share in their investments. They
offered some astounding returns and people got stuck in to them. However, their fall was
quicker than their rise. The fall out of changes in economic conditions was that people
lost money heavily and also lost some of the trust they had for non-government agencies
when it came to savings. The second round of bouncing back of the economy brought to
the fore another major area, Mutual Funds (MFs). Despite the fact that UTI had been
around for over 30 years and had been a preferred destination for many people with US
64, its flagship, being the single largest scheme in terms of its, key corpus and its investor
base, this industry has started picking pace only in the last few years. People started
receiving Mutual Funds with caution and it were only when they found them to be safe
did some semblance of confidence return.
However, there are several things that should go against this run. For one, people
who invested early this year are not likely to have made money till now with both equity
and debt markets witnessing volatility. This makes it essential to stay invested for a
longer period than envisaged to safeguard their principal. Second, the market conditions
are temporary. With market reviving, equity based funds will see the net worth of people
going up. In fact, if return of the market in last six months is compared with Average
return of equity funds then Mutual Funds are still better off, having gone down by just
15% as against the fall of over 20% in the market. Moreover, they help people diversify
risks. On the debt market front, the market is not expecting further consolidation of
interest rates even though there are some concerns about the rising inflationary pressures
and a falling Rupee. With the previous rise in market yield already discounted, the higher
yield will help people recover fast. This in turn implies that the debt funds too will
perform well.
For the investors these are expected to be the positive signs that can help them
regain some of the confidence. Mutual Funds are not the instruments of speculation.
Equity investors need to understand that timing the market correctly being virtually
impossible a task; they would do well to stay invested for longer periods. Market will
reward the investors for their patience, as the economic cycle will turn positive in long
run. Another important issue that needs to be addressed pertains to finding the right
products to suit the investment objective. People have to control greed and invest in
schemes that suit their need. They also need to decide upon their investment horizon as
then they can choose the product with much more ease.
On the whole, the industry may have seen some market factors go against it in
recent past but the industry is here to stay. Though investor confidence has been shaken a
bit, mutual funds are still a safe destination for investors.
Why SIP?
Mutual Fund investments are managed by qualified and experienced professionals who
have the expertise of investment techniques, backed by dedicated investment research
team
You can purchase scheme units at a lesser cost as most of the Asset Management
Companies (AMCs) charge less entry load (for some scheme even NIL) for SIP
investments, as compared to normal purchases in the scheme.
SIPs make the volatility in the market work in your favour. Since a fixed amount is
invested more units are purchased when a schemes NAV is low and fewer units when the
NAV is high. As a result, over a period of time these market fluctuations are generally
averaged. Thus the average cost of your investment is often reduced.
Since you invest regularly, it makes you disciplined in your savings, which leads to
wealth accumulation.
The SIP reduces the average purchase cost, even in volatile markets with relative ease.
When you invest a fixed amount every month, the number of mutual fund units you
actually buy depends on their market price. Therefore, with the money you invest each
month, you can buy less units when the market moves up and more units when the
market moves down.
This means you are averaging out your cost. If you invest Rs 1000 a month at a price of
Rs 20 a unit, you will have bought 50 units (1000/20). But at a price of Rs 10 per unit,
you will have bought 100 units (1000/10). Investing a fixed sum regularly means
averaging out the cost, as you get fewer units when the price goes up and more when the
price goes down.
SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE COMPANY:
Strengths
1. Management philosophy and commitment to maximize shareholders returns
2. Upgraded product design and development facilities to develop new products and aid
diversification
3. Ongoing activities to support up gradation of operational performance and rise in
productivity
4. Team of talented and committed professionals available to improve companies
performance Weakness
1. Competition from cheap imports
2. Low customer base
Opportunities
1. UFSL has initiated development of products for diesel application. This will provide
tremendous scope for diversification and growth
2. Acquisition of AMTEC to provide opportunities to access global OEMs
3. Opportunity to support AMTECs operations by supplying products from India
4. The introduction of new emission norms will provide UFSL opportunity to develop
injection systems and thereby upgrade the status of the company from product to system
supplier.
SIP allows the investor to buy units on a given date every month. The investor
decides the amount and also the mutual fund scheme.
While the investor's investment remains the same, more number of units can be
bought in a declining market and less number of units in a rising market.
The investor automatically participates in the market swings once the option for
SIP is made.
The systematic investment plans is the best method to stay invested without bothering
too much about the market ups and downs. Ideally one should be looking at an SIP in
mutual funds (better than direct investment as one does not the fundamentals of the stock,
industry etc) and also should ensure that the frequency of the SIP is not monthly but at
least 2-4 times a month. Through regular investing, one gets to invest in the highs as well
as the lows. This helps in averaging out the market volatility especially if there is too
much volatility within the month. The investor keeps investing a certain amount (even as
small as Rs 50 in case of some mutual finds) at regular intervals. As the market soars,
even the value of the investment scales new highs. And when the market tanks, the value
of the mutual fund units the net asset value (NAV) too comes down. This means
more units are bought for the same SIP amount.
3.Convenience:
SIP can be operated by simply providing post dated cheques with the completed
enrolment form or give ECS instructions. The cheques can be banked on the specified
dates and the units credited into the investor's account. The SIP facility is available in the
Principal Income Fund, Monthly Income Plan, Child Benefit Fund, Balanced Fund, Index
Fund, Growth Fund, Equity fund and Tax Savings Fund.
1. Transaction costs:
In any mutual fund investment, there are two kinds of transaction costs viz
entry/exit loads (for purchase or redemption of fund units) and the expense ratio (annual
cost of fund management).
Let us examine each of these in the illustration given above. Most balanced funds,
unfortunately, charge the same entry load as equity funds (2.25%).
Thus, in our numerical example, of the Rs 100 invested in the balanced fund, only
Rs 97.8 would go towards allotment of units. In our synthetic example, the entire Rs 35
would go into debt units (there being no entry load), and Rs 63.57 towards equity units.
Thus, in the synthetic case, we have escaped paying entry load on the debt part of the
investment. This difference gets magnified with time, due to compounding.
The other major cost the expense ratio is (at least currently) similar in the
balanced and synthetic fund scenario. In fact, the difference between funds of similar
category exceeds the difference between the equity and balanced categories. So, we
ignore this term in the comparison.
2. Tax implications:
There are two tax structures in mutual funds, depending on whether a fund is
classified as debt or equity. The following table summarises the currently prevailing tax
structure:
Thus, equity funds enjoy beneficial tax treatment. Here, balanced funds enjoy the
beneficial treatment of being taxed like equity funds and, in this, they clearly score over
the synthetic portfolio we had manufactured, where the debt portion would be taxed at a
higher rate.
Balanced funds have higher transaction costs, but are beneficial from a tax
perspective. Let us now examine the net impact of all these factors on returns earned by a
typical investor.
The accompanying table shows the net impact in both the balanced fund
investment and the synthetic portfolio; for the period of three years, given the equity and
debt returns as assumed above. As can be seen there, the synthetic portfolio outperforms,
but by a very small margin. For all practical purposes, a good balanced fund can easily
perform as well as a synthetically-made portfolio with similar debt to equity ratio. And
we do have such excellent balanced funds in todays mutual fund market.
As an investor, if you are saving regularly for the long term and want a low
involvement hassle free instrument, balanced funds are for you. If you otherwise have a
lot of debt investment (Bank FD, PPF, NSC, liquid funds, etc) then you might be better
off going for 100% equity oriented funds instead. In either case, you can be comfortable
in the knowledge that the benefits of one option over another are not overwhelming; and
in most cases not even significant.
Simplicity
ii.
Hassle Free
iii.
iv.
Please note that there is no0 guarantee that SIP will always produce a profit.
Example
Market goes down after going up-(1)
Monthly investment
1200
1200
1200
1200
1200
Total=6000
Unit Price
20
24
24
20
20
Average=21.60
Units acquired
60
50
50
60
60
280
Unit Price
24
23
22
20
24
Average=22.60
Units acquired
50
52
54
60
50
266
Secondary data from fact sheets, brochures and e-sources was taken into
consideration to compare the Systematic investment plan with One time
Investment
Observing current market unit price fluctuations in order to obtain net asset values
at different time periods.
Study was made to explain the benefits that generated the returns through
Systematic investment plan over Lump sum in different plans of PRUICICI.
Comparing the growth on net asset values generated over different time horizons
in different investment patterns through charts and graphs
Limitations:
1. Study is confined to few investment options of PRUICICI mutual funds
2. The data under study is taken from past records of company hence changes at
present cannot be identified
3. The future volatile conditions of market cannot be determined
4. Mutual funds are subjected to market risks
COMPANY PROFILE
Kellton is a professionally managed organization and is fast emerging as one of the most
respected Stock Broking and Wealth Management Companies in India. The Kellton
Group is a member of the National Stock Exchange (NSE),Bombay Stock Exchange
(BSE) and the two leading Commodities Exchanges in the country MCX and NCDEX.
Kellton is also registered as a Depository Participant with CDSL.
At Kellton, we offer you Broking and Wealth Management Services of world class
standards with a personal touch. We thoroughly understand the value of relationships
with our customers as opposed to just transactions at a business level. We are dedicated to
provide services with a personal touch so that our customer gets customized solutions and
attention. It is our earnest endeavor to enhance the trading experience of our customers
through continuous improvement in our services.
MISION AND VISION
Our Mission is the foundation on which the organization is built. Our vision is our
aspiration to continually improve and grow; to become the best. Our values guide us
through our actions.
MISSION
To take financial services to the next level of personalization and customization with
emphasis on value of interactions at a more personal level than just transactions at a
business level.
VISION
To be a respected enterprise that provides best-of-breed financial solutions, with a
personal touch.
VALUES
Commitment, dedication, integrity, team work, passion and attitude are the core values
that guide us through our actions.
MANAGEMENT TEAM
NARIANJAN CHINTAM
Niranjan is a recognized leader and innovator in the area of middle market Mergers and
JOHN LINTON
John has more than two decades of experience in corporate development and operational
management. As an entrepreneur, he owned an emerging Internet and software company.
With more than 19 years experience as a business owner and mergers and acquisitions
specialist, John knows how to structure and negotiate contracts in many markets; giving
John the ability and experience to structure deals for both public and privately held
businesses. Over the years, he has gained reputation as a top corporate and business
development consultant with numerous successful strategic partnerships, mergers and
acquisitions under his belt. John has advised clients and managed M&A transactions in
virtually every industry and has particular experience in emerging Internet, software &
high-tech start-up companies. He has himself founded and developed several profitable
Internet-based companies prior to his consulting career. Some of the companies include
iWebspawn.Inc, EZ Domain Auction and Countycorner.com.
MIHIR SHAH
Mihir Shah brings to Kellton over 20 years of experience in the financial services
industry. His expertise spans across many streams in this industry such as Merchant
Banking, Primary Market Operations, Distribution, Issue Management, Project Finance,
and Secondary Market Operations. During his two-decade career, he has created niche
markets, set up branches and played crucial roles in the growth stories of some of the
well-reputed brokerage firms in India. His current areas of focus are methodologically
optimizing returns for clients and relationship management. Financial advisory and
wealth management are his core service areas. He is an excellent team leader and
understands the dynamics behind driving a team towards success
SRINIVAS POTLURI
Srinivas Potluri has over 18 years of global experience in engineering and technology
services with a special focus on systems integration and large systems deployments. His
diverse experience includes working in the automotive, financial, healthcare,
SERVICES
EQUITY
Kellton offers you a strategic, meticulous and personalized approach to maximize your
returns and reach your investment goals by trading effectively in equities. However, it
can also be a very risky proposition due to high risk-return trade off prevalent in the stock
market. Hence, it is more appropriate to take the help of an experienced and trustworthy
expert
who
will
guide
you
as
to
when,
where
and
how
to
invest.
at
any
phase
of
the
process.
Kellton is a trading member in the NSE Derivatives segment which offers a gateway to
the exciting world of derivatives trading on Equities and Indices. The derivative market is
a highly lucrative market that gives investors, arbitrageurs and speculators immense
potential to earn returns. Over the years the Futures & Options segment has emerged as a
popular medium for trading in the financial markets.
COMMODITIES
Commodities Derivatives market has emerged as a new avenue for investors to create
wealth. Commodity derivatives that were initially developed for risk management
purposes are now growing in popularity as an investment tool. Based on the
fundamentals for demand and supply, Commodities form a separate asset class offering
investors,
arbitrageurs
and
speculators
immense
potential
to
earn
returns.
At, Kellton we understand the shifts and swings of Commodities markets and will
provide you with information about the volatility of the investible assets and when and
how to diversify them during high volatility to stabilize your returns. We closely monitor
and assess the performance of all classes of investments and will provide you with a
customized solution into the proper use of commodities within the mix of other asset
classes to maximize your returns and minimize risks.
INVESTMENT BANKING
MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
Kelltons extensive expertise extends to a wide range of M&A transactions customized to
cater to the specific requirements of each of our client. Our relationships with many
leading financial groups enables our clients to get access to the emerging pool of private
equity financings.
SEEL-SIDE ADVISORY
As an advisor to selling stakeholders we analyze the options objectively and
dispassionately keeping in view the long term benefit to both parties. Our expertise,
experience and our network make us uniquely positioned to find an ideal partner for your
company
and
assess
the
mutual
benefits
from
this
transaction.
We perform the due diligence so as to avoid any surprises during value disclosure. Our
active involvement in deal structuring and contract negotiations would help you
understand the implications of the transaction from total perspective and be fully aware
of all legalese involved.
BUY-SIDE ADVISORY
Our extensive network comes handy in searching & selecting a wide-range of suitable
candidates. We help buyers identify the attributes of the target company including various
parameters. Upon confirmation of interest of the target company, we examine various
factors like financial data, brand image among stakeholders etc and perform a due
business
partners.
We assess optimal capitalization and recognize the means to increase funds. After
enlisting a group of potential target investors we position the company effectively to the
investors. We take care of the necessary communication to investors and manage due
diligence process
CAPITAL RESTRUCTURING
Capital restructuring may involve refinancing at every at every level of capital structure
which include securing asset-based loans & debt financing and achieving strategic
partnership by identifying suitable prospects.
DEBT SYNDICATION
We arrange finance from multiple banks/financial institutions to provide the borrower a
credit facility using common debt documents. We help companies to leverage on debt as
an instrument to raise capital through structured financial products for various needs.
WEALTH MANAGEMENT
Wealth Management helps you maximize your returns in asset management, investment
management and portfolio management. Developing strategies and innovative models to
build wealth from middle market business assets requires expertise and experience. Even
a seasoned investor knows that effective timing of markets is not possible and therefore
professional and expert advice is essential to generate superior returns from the market.
At Kellton we offer your client advisory services with the objectives of superior returns,
risk minimization and portfolio diversification.
DEPOSITORY SERVICES
We provide the dual benefits of trading and depository services at Kellton where you can
experience efficient, risk free depository services. Kellton is a registered Depository
participant with CDSL.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
NAV is calculated each day by taking the closing market value of all securities owned
plus all other assets such as cash, subtracting all liabilities, then dividing the result (total
net assets) by the total number of shares outstanding.
Calculating NAV
The NAV is a calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the net assets of
the
Mean:
The mean is the most commonly used measure of central tendency. When we talk about
an "average", we usually are referring to the mean. The mean is simply the sum of the
values divided by the total number of items in the set. The result is referred to as the
arithmetic mean. Sometimes it is useful to give more weighting to certain data points, in
which case the result is called the weighted arithmetic mean.
=
/N
where
= simple mena
= number of data points in the population
= value of each data point
The mean is valid only for interval data or ratio data. Since it uses the values of all of the
data points in the population or sample, the mean is influenced by outliers that may
be at the extremes of the data set
Amount Invested
(Rs)
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
Units Purchased
78.61
102.77
90.66
81.49
79.93
76.92
79.23
73.96
73.20
70.97
76.45
75.75
Average NAV
12.72
9.73
11.03
12.27
12.51
13.00
12.62
13.52
13.66
14.09
13.08
13.20
12.60
Amount Invested
Amount (Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2006
12000
943.4
Amount
Invested
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
Units Purchased
68.2
70.27
71.42
71.83
71.15
69.89
69.24
68.58
68.06
67.12
66.64
14.66
14.23
14.00
13.92
14.05
14.30
14.44
14.58
14.69
14.89
15.00
8/3/2008
Total
1000
12000
65.842
Average NAV
15.18
14.5
Amount
Invested
Units Purchased
8/4/2007
12000
818.6
14.66
Amount Invested
(Rs)
7/4/2008
9/5/2008
7/6/2008
7/7/2008
8/8/2008
8/9/2008
7/10/2008
7/11/2008
7/12/2008
9/1/2009
7/2/2009
7/3/2009
Total
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
Units Purchased
59.95
66.73
65.62
65.147
63.34
61.97
60.42
60.69
59.31
57.53
57.39
56.29
Average NAV
16.4
16.68
14.98
15.23
15.35
15.78
16.13
16.55
16.47
16.86
17.38
17.42
17.76
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2008
12000
719.40
16.68
Amount Invested
(Rs)
7/4/2009
8/5/2009
7/6/2009
7/7/2009
7/8/2009
7/9/2009
9/10/2009
7/11/2009
7/12/2009
8/1/2010
7/2/2010
7/3/2010
Total
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
Units Purchased
53.95
51.54
56.66
56.29
55.93
54.65
53.73
52.50
51.65
51.26
49.88
51.27
Average NAV
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2009
12000
647.6
18.53
Amount Invested
(Rs)
9/4/2010
7/5/2010
7/6/2010
9/7/2010
7/8/2010
7/9/2010
8/10/2010
7/11/2010
7/12/2010
7/1/2011
7/2/2011
7/3/2011
Total
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
Units Purchased
44.03
49.57
48.82
47.88
47.82
47.49
46.60
45.98
45.34
43.40
44.35
44.98
Average NAV
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2010
12000
528.4
22.71
Systematic
Amount
Invested NAV
Single
Investment
Amount NAV
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
12.6
14.50
16.4
18.8
21.6
12.72
14.66
16.8
18.53
22.71
Interpretation:
1. In the year 2006-07 we observe that the ICICI Prudential child care plan-study
plan investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested
and single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the systematic amount invested NAV is 12.6 which is lesser than the
single investment amount NAV i.e., 12.72.It means that Systematic investment
plan has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
2. In the year 2007-08 we observe that the ICICI Prudential child care plan-study
plan investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested
and single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the systematic amount invested NAV is 14.5 which is lesser than the
single investment amount NAV i.e., 14.66.It means that Systematic investment
plan has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
3. In the year 2008-09 we observe that the ICICI Prudential child care plan-study
plan investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested
and single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the systematic amount invested NAV is 16.4 which is lesser than the
single investment amount NAV i.e., 22.71.It means that Systematic investment
plan has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
4. In the year 2009-10we observe that the ICICI Prudential child care plan-study
plan investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested
and single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the single investment amount NAV is 18.8 which is lesser than the
systematic amount invested t NAV i.e., 18.53.It means that Single investment
amount has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
5. In the year 2010-11 we observe that the Prudential child care plan-study plan
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the systematic amount invested NAV is 21.6 which is lesser than the
single investment amount NAV i.e., 16.8.It means that Systematic investment plan
has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2006
7/5/2006
9/6/2006
7/7/2006
7/8/2006
8/9/2006
7/10/2006
7/11/2006
8/12/2006
7/1/2007
9/2/2007
7/3/2007
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
92.08
132.27
114.02
108.81
105.59
94.78
95.60
132.80
85.32
73.20
81.96
77.63
10.86
7.56
8.77
9.19
9.47
10.55
10.46
7.53
11.72
13.66
12.2
12.88
TOTAL
12000
Average NAV
10.40
Amount
Invested
Amount (Rs)
Units
Purchased
7/4/2006
12000
1104,97
Net Asset
Value
10.86
Amount Invested
Units Purchased
7/4/2007
7/5/2007
7/6/2007
7/7/2007
9/8/2007
7/9/2007
7/10/2007
8/11/2007
7/12/2007
7/1/2008
7/2/2008
8/3/2008
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
60.60
88.10
81.76
91.07
88.57
83.96
77.22
77.57
72.88
64.47
70.02
58.34
16.5
11.35
12.23
10.98
11.29
11.91
12.95
12.89
13.72
15.51
14.28
17.14
12000
Average NAV
12.40
Total
Amount
Invested
Units
Purchased
Net Asset
Value
8/4/2007
12000
727.27
16.5
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2008
9/5/2008
7/6/2008
7/7/2008
8/8/2008
8/9/2008
7/10/2008
7/11/2008
7/12/2008
9/1/2009
7/2/2009
7/3/2009
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
45.35
53.39
50.81
47.28
45.18
39.47
34.68
34.071
35.76
32.456
29.99
28.77
22.05
18.73
19.68
21.15
22.13
25.33
28.83
29.35
27.96
30.81
33.34
34.75
Total
12000
Average NAV
26.17
Amount Invested
(Rs)
12000
Units Purchased
544.21
22.05
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2009
8/5/2009
7/6/2009
7/7/2009
7/8/2009
7/9/2009
9/10/2009
7/11/2009
7/12/2009
8/1/2010
7/2/2010
7/3/2010
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
23.93
24.78
24.32
30.82
30.12
30.01
26.94
25.77
25.11
24.26
24.12
24.21
41.78
40.34
41.11
32.44
33.2
33.32
37.11
38.8
39.82
41.21
41.45
41.3
Total
12000
Average NAV
38.49
Amount
Invested (Rs)
Units
Purchased
Net Asset
Value
7/4/2009
12000
287.21
41.78
Amount
Invested (Rs)
Units
Purchased
Net Asset
Value
9/4/2010
7/5/2010
7/6/2010
9/7/2010
7/8/2010
7/9/2010
8/10/2010
7/11/2010
7/12/2010
7/1/2011
7/2/2011
7/3/2011
Total
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
23.78
25.26
25.56
24.18
23.28
22.73
22.22
21.84
20.77
20.06
16.78
20.27
Average NAV
42.05
39.58
39.11
41.34
42.94
43.99
45.00
45.77
48.14
49.83
59.56
49.31
45.14
Amount
Invested (Rs)
Units
Purchased
Net Asset
Value
7/4/2010
12000
265.37
42.05
Systematic Amount
Invested NAV
Single Investment
Amount NAV
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
10.40
12.40
26.17
38.49
45.14
10.86
16.40
22.05
41.78
42.05
Interpretation:
1. In the year 2006-07 we observe that the ICICI Prudential FMCG Fund
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the systematic amount invested NAV is 10.40 which is lesser than the
single investment amount NAV i.e., 10.86.It means that Systematic investment
plan has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
2. In the year 2007-08 we observe that the ICICI Prudential FMCG Fund
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the systematic amount invested NAV is 12.40 which is lesser than the
single investment amount NAV i.e., 16.40.It means that Systematic investment
plan has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
3. In the year 2008-09 we observe that the ICICI Prudential FMCG Fund
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the single investment amount NAV is 26.20 which is lesser than the
systematic amount invested t NAV i.e., 22.1.It means that Single investment
amount has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
4. In the year 2009-10 we observe that the ICICI Prudential FMCG Fund
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the systematic amount invested NAV is 38.50 which is lesser than the
single investment amount NAV i.e., 41.70It means that Systematic investment
plan has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
5. In the year 2010-11 we observe that the ICICI Prudential FMCG Fund
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the single investment amount NAV is 42.10 which is lesser than the
systematic amount invested t NAV i.e., 45.10.It means that Single investment
amount has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2006
7/5/2006
9/6/2006
7/7/2006
7/8/2006
8/9/2006
7/10/2006
7/11/2006
8/12/2006
7/1/2007
9/2/2007
7/3/2007
TOTAL
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
51.97
52.43
47.89
43.29
41.33
35.88
33.67
31.06
29.71
25.70
25.62
25.27
Average NAV
19.24
19.07
20.88
23.1
24.19
27.87
29.7
32.19
33.65
38.9
39.02
39.56
28.94
Amount Invested
Amount (Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2006
12000
623.70
Amount Invested
Units Purchased
7/4/2007
7/5/2007
7/6/2007
7/7/2007
9/8/2007
7/9/2007
7/10/2007
8/11/2007
7/12/2007
7/1/2008
7/2/2008
8/3/2008
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
26.61
26.83
32.12
32.16
30.23
29.24
27.21
26.48
24.93
23.62
23.20
21.41
Average NAV
37.58
37.26
31.13
31.09
33.08
34.2
36.74
37.76
40.11
42.33
43.09
46.69
37.58
Total
Date
8/4/2007
319.31
Investment Date
7/4/2008
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
22.44
22.89
21.60
20.79
18.94
17.74
17.11
17.72
16.09
14.79
13.94
13.12
Average NAV
269.36
44.55
43.68
46.29
48.08
52.78
56.36
58.42
56.42
62.14
67.58
71.7
76.19
57.01
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
11.90
11.12
14.65
13.84
13.49
12.18
11.78
11.11
10.58
10.84
10.21
11.85
Average NAV
83.97
89.92
68.24
72.25
74.09
82.06
84.84
89.97
94.47
92.25
97.86
84.33
84.52
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2009
12000
142.90
83.97
Investment Date
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
9/4/2010
7/5/2010
7/6/2010
9/7/2010
7/8/2010
7/9/2010
8/10/2010
7/11/2010
7/12/2010
7/1/2011
7/2/2011
7/3/2011
Total
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
9.86
11.35
10.74
10.36
10.17
10.44
10.19
9.74
8.89
9.45
8.77
8.90
AVERAGE NAV
101.33
88.05
93.05
96.45
98.3
95.7
98.05
102.63
112.38
105.82
113.93
112.28
101.49
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2010
12000
118.42
101.33
Systematic
Amount
Invested NAV
Single
Investment
Amount NAV
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
28.94
37.58
57.01
84.52
101.49
19.24
37.58
44.55
83.97
101.33
Interpretation
1. In the year 2006-07we observe that the ICICI PRUDENTIAL GROWTH PLAN GROWTH investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount
invested and single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above
analysis it is clear that the single investment amount NAV is 19.24 which is lesser
than the systematic amount invested t NAV i.e., 28.94.It means that Single
investment amount has more units to buy and single investment has less units to
buy
2. In the year 2007-08we observe that the ICICI Prudential growth plan growth
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the single investment amount NAV is 37.58 and which is equal to the
systematic amount invested t NAV i.e., 37.58.It means that Single investment
amount and single investment has equal units to buy
3. In the year 2008-09 we observe that the ICICI Prudential growth plan growth
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the single investment amount NAV is 44.55 which is lesser than the
systematic amount invested t NAV i.e., 57.01It means that Single investment
amount has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
4. In the year 2009-10 we observe that the ICICI Prudential growth plan growth
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the single investment amount NAV is 83.97 which is lesser than the
systematic amount invested t NAV i.e., 84.52.It means that Single investment
amount has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
5. In the year 2010-11 we observe that the ICICI Prudential growth plan growth
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV).
Amount
Invested (Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2006
7/5/2006
9/6/2006
7/7/2006
7/8/2006
8/9/2006
7/10/2006
7/11/2006
8/12/2006
7/1/2007
9/2/2007
7/3/2007
TOTAL
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
77.91
77.45
76.19
75.35
74.27
72.53
71.39
70.65
70.19
68.67
69.01
69.01
Average NAV
13.84
12.91
13.12
13.27
13.46
13.78
14.00
14.15
14.24
14.56
14.49
14.49
13.9
Amount Invested
Amount (Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2006
12000
866.74
Amount
Invested
Units Purchased
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
68.74
68.46
69.38
69.21
68.84
68.05
67.33
67.26
66.29
65.76
65.12
64.36
Average NAV
15.48
14.60
14.41
14.44
14.52
14.69
14.85
14.86
15.08
15.20
15.35
15.53
14.9
Date
8/4/2007
775.19
Investment Date
7/4/2007
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
64.4
64.13
63.42
63.02
61.77
60.66
60.47
60.82
59.98
58.59
58.01
57.36
Average NAV
726.39
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
56.13
54.96
57.31
56.73
56.52
55.16
54.47
53.59
52.77
52.68
52.23
53.37
Average NAV
16.52
15.07
15.76
15.86
16.19
16.48
16.53
16.44
16.67
17.06
17.23
17.43
16.4
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2009
12000
636.94
18.84
Amount
Invested (Rs)
Units Purchased
9/4/2010
7/5/2010
7/6/2010
9/7/2010
7/8/2010
7/9/2010
8/10/2010
7/11/2010
7/12/2010
7/1/2011
7/2/2011
7/3/2011
Total
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
52.93
52.35
51.9
51.09
50.61
50.45
49.66
48.44
47.47
46.12
47.26
48.46
Average NAV
19.92
19.10
19.26
18.44
19.75
18.82
19.94
20.64
20.83
20.92
20.98
20.63
19.9
Amount
Invested (Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2010
12000
602.41
19.92
Systematic
Amount
Invested NAV
Single
Investment
Amount NAV
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2007-10
2010-11
13.9
14.9
16.4
18.4
19.9
13.84
15.48
16.52
18.84
19.92
Interpretation
1. In the year 2006-07 we observe that the ICICI Prudential MIP - Cumulative
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the single investment amount NAV is 18.8 which is lesser than the
systematic amount invested t NAV i.e., 18.53.It means that Single investment
amount has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
2. In the year 2007-08 we observe that the ICICI Prudential MIP - Cumulative
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the systematic amount invested NAV is 14.9 which is lesser than the
single investment amount NAV i.e., 15.48.It means that Systematic investment
plan has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
3. In the year 2008-09 we observe that the ICICI Prudential MIP - Cumulative
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the systematic amount invested NAV is 16.4 which is lesser than the
single investment amount NAV i.e., 16.52.It means that Systematic investment
plan has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
4. In the year 2009-10 we observe that the ICICI Prudential MIP - Cumulative
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the systematic amount invested NAV is 18.4 which is lesser than the
single investment amount NAV i.e., 18.84.It means that Systematic investment
plan has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
5. In the year 2010-11we observe that the ICICI Prudential MIP - Cumulative
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the systematic amount invested NAV is 19.90 which is lesser than the
single investment amount NAV i.e., 19.92.It means that Systematic investment
plan has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
Investment Date
7/4/2006
230.41
320.51
374.53
343.64
303.03
279.32
257.73
248.75
242.71
180.180
187.61
131.23
Average NAV
4181.18
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
149.70
198.80
206.61
206.61
187.96
173.91
169.49
164.74
158.47
154.79
150.15
124.37
Average NAV
6.68
5.03
4.84
4.84
5.32
5.75
5.9
6.07
6.31
6.46
6.66
8.04
5.99
Amount Invested
Units Purchased
8/4/2007
12000
1796.41
6.68
Investment Date
7/4/2008
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
113.89
143.47
135.86
128.53
119.61
108.93
111.48
115.60
126.90
112.86
110.86
94.42
Average NAV
1366.74
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
79.05
81.96
118.62
104.16
100.70
90.82
89.04
79.11
90.57
74.34
68.96
69.15
Average
8.78
6.97
7.36
7.78
8.36
9.18
8.97
8.65
7.88
8.86
9.02
10.6
8.53
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2009
12000
948.61
12.7
Amount
Units Purchased
Invested (Rs)
9/4/2010
7/5/2010
7/6/2010
9/7/2010
7/8/2010
7/9/2010
8/10/2010
7/11/2010
7/12/2010
7/1/2011
7/2/2011
7/3/2011
Total
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
63.01
69.34
64.35
58.85
63.49
62.89
69.15
72.56
65.06
55.55
68.30
70.17
Average NAV
15.9
14.4
15.5
17
15.8
15.9
14.5
13.8
15.4
18
14.6
14.3
15.4
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2010
12000
756.14
15.9
Systematic
Amount
Invested NAV
Single
Investment
Amount NAV
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
4.2
5.99
8.53
11.8
15.4
4.34
6.68
8.78
12.7
15.9
Interpretation:
1. In the year 2006-07 we observe that the ICICI Technology Fund - Growth
investment decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and
single investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is
clear that the systematic amount invested NAV is 4.2 which is lesser than the
single investment amount NAV i.e., 4.34.It means that Systematic investment plan
has more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
2. In the year 2007-08we observe that the
Amount
Invested (Rs)
7/4/2006
7/5/2006
9/6/2006
7/7/2006
7/8/2006
8/9/2006
7/10/2006
7/11/2006
8/12/2006
7/1/2007
9/2/2007
7/3/2007
TOTAL
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
Units Purchased
43.21
48.40
53.33
60.45
70.17
45.06
41.85
39.95
35.80
36.17
36.46
39.32
Average NAV
23.14
20.66
18.75
16.54
14.25
22.19
23.89
25.03
27.93
27.64
27.42
25.43
22.7
Amount Invested
Amount (Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2006
12000
518.33
Amount
Invested
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
Units Purchased
29.93
34.41
40.74
38.74
34.30
32.49
32.39
30.68
25.23
25.87
25.86
24.26
Average NAV
33.41
29.06
24.54
25.81
29.15
30.78
30.87
32.59
39.63
38.65
38.66
41.22
32.9
Amount Invested
Units Purchased
8/4/2007
12000
359.17
33.41
Amount
Invested (Rs)
7/4/2008
9/5/2008
7/6/2008
7/7/2008
8/8/2008
8/9/2008
7/10/2008
7/11/2008
7/12/2008
9/1/2009
7/2/2009
7/3/2009
Total
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
Units Purchased
16.93
20.50
18.66
18.37
23.11
14.61
18.29
17.83
15.96
15.00
15.21
13.57
Average NAV
59.06
48.76
53.57
54.41
43.26
68.43
54.65
56.07
62.65
66.64
65.74
73.65
58.9
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2008
12000
203.18
59.06
Amount Invested
(Rs)
07/04/2009
08/05/2009
06/06/2009
07/07/2009
07/08/2009
07/09/2009
09/10/2009
07/11/2009
07/12/2009
08/01/2010
07/02/2010
07/03/2010
Total
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
Units Purchased
10.72
9.92
14.21
13.68
13.25
11.38
10.94
10.69
10.84
10.48
11.90
12.48
Average NAV
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2009
12000
128.7
93.24
Amount
Invested (Rs)
9/4/2010
7/5/2010
7/6/2010
9/7/2010
7/8/2010
7/9/2010
8/10/2010
7/11/2010
7/12/2010
7/1/2011
7/2/2011
7/3/2011
Total
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
12000
Units Purchased
9.74
12.21
11.00
11.76
10.76
10.40
10.00
10.19
9.77
9.36
9.38
9.75
Average NAV
102.7
81.87
90.86
85.02
92.93
96.09
99.92
98.07
102.3
106.8
106.5
102.5
97.1
Amount Invested
(Rs)
Units Purchased
7/4/2010
12000
116.90
102.7
Systematic
Amount
Invested NAV
Single
Investment
Amount NAV
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
22.7
32.9
58.90
86.4
97.1
23.14
33.41
59.06
93.24
102.7
Interpretation:
1. In the year 2006-07 we observe that the ICICI Tax Plan-Growth investment
decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and single
investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is clear that
the systematic amount invested NAV is 22.7 which is lesser than the single
investment amount NAV i.e., 23.14.It means that Systematic investment plan has
more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
2. In the year 2007-08 we observe that the ICICI Tax Plan-Growth investment
decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and single
investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is clear that
the systematic amount invested NAV is 32.9 which is lesser than the single
investment amount NAV i.e., 33.41.It means that Systematic investment plan has
more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
3. In the year 2008-09 we observe that the ICICI Tax Plan-Growth investment is
based on the parameters systematic amount invested and single investment
amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is clear that the
systematic amount invested NAV is 58.90 which is lesser than the single
investment amount NAV i.e., 59.60.It means that Systematic investment plan has
more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
4. In the year 2009-10we observe that the ICICI Tax Plan-Growth investment
decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and single
investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is clear that
the systematic amount invested NAV is 86.4 which is lesser than the single
investment amount NAV i.e., 93.24.It means that Systematic investment plan has
more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
5. In the year 2010-11 we observe that the ICICI Tax Plan-Growth investment
decision is based on the parameters systematic amount invested and single
investment amount net asset value (NAV). From the above analysis it is clear that
the systematic amount invested NAV is 97.1 which is lesser than the single
investment amount NAV i.e., 102.1 .It means that Systematic investment plan has
more units to buy and single investment has less units to buy
Conclusions:
1.
Mutual funds are becoming one of the foremost Investment avenues available to
the investors as it is structured as per the investors horizon and risk appetite.
2. This study helps to understand the Systematic Investment Pattern and its
advantages over Lump sum investment that are available to the investors.
3. The systematic investment plan is suggestible for the employees and the investors
with. Because limited funds investment decision are take correctly with diverting
their funds in a systematic way.
4. The benefit of rupee cost averaging helps the investors in compensating the losses
as well as appreciating the asset values over a certain period of time.
5. The investments in mutual funds are completely subjected to market risks hence
the investor must have a close watch on the different forces acting upon and
choose the proper scheme and make investment at appropriate time in order to
acquire desirable returns.
Suggestions:
1. Digital marketing: E-commerce is gradually showing signs of gaining acceptance
and electronic sale of financial products is especially gaining volumes.
2. As Indian markets mature, regulatory restrictions are becoming easy paving the
way for introduction of innumerable specialized products hitherto not introduced
in India such as hedge funds and derivative-based products.
3. The government and companies should take more plans such that every one
should be involve in the investment like systematic plans .There should be more
innovative plans for developing the Investment market in India.
4. As the market is globalised the government needs to inform the international
market situation to companys and investors.
5.
There is a need for improvement in financial services to tap the market especially
in the rural areas.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
References:
1. Study materials provided by Kellton Financial Services
2. Brochures
3. Application forms
4. Promotional Materials
5. Various books :a. Investments how to win by Prasanna Chandra
b. Portfolio Management by James L. Farell Fr.
c. How Mutual Funds Work -- by Albert J. Fredman, Russ Wiles
d. Mutual funds management and Working by Lalit.K.Bansal
INTERNET (Hyperlinks):
I. www.kellton.com
II. www.valueresearch.com
III. www.mutualfundsindia.com
IV. www.forbes.com/funds
V. www.investorword.com