Living Free in A Fem-Nazi World V0.03

Living Free in a Fem-Nazi World
The Book
Version 0.03
1st April 2011
Author: Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c)
Table of Contents
1.
CHANGE CONTROL LOG ................................................................................................... 4
2.
LAWFUL NOTICE TO THOSE WHO WOULD SLANDER ME ............................................. 5
3.
WHY SAY THAT THE WEST IS A FEM-NAZI WORLD ..................................................... 6
4.
A FOR WORD AND WARNING.......................................................................................... 10

4.1. What About The Zombies? .......................................................................................... 11
4.2. Going Forward?........................................................................................................... 12
5.
INTENDED AUDIENCE...................................................................................................... 13
6.
PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................... 14
7.
SUBJECTS COVERED IN THIS BOOK ............................................................................. 15
8.
HOW ARE MEN ENSLAVED? ........................................................................................... 16

8.1. The Woolly Mammoth Story ........................................................................................ 16
9.
WHAT IS THE SOLUTION? ............................................................................................... 18
10.
HOW DO I CLAIM MY RIGHTS? .................................................................................... 20
11.
THE DEFAULT JUDGEMENT ........................................................................................ 26
12.
HOW DO I PERFORM A STRAWMAN RECAPTURE?.................................................. 31
12.1.
Why Perform A Strawman Recapture? .................................................................... 31
12.2.
Components of a Strawman Recapture ................................................................... 31
12.2.1.
12.2.2.
12.2.3.
12.2.4.
12.2.5.
12.2.6.
12.2.7.
Certificate of Sovereignty .................................................................................................................32

Deed of Evidence .............................................................................................................................32
Common Law Copyright Notice........................................................................................................32
Hold Harmless Agreement ...............................................................................................................33
Private Agreement ............................................................................................................................33
Security Agreement ..........................................................................................................................34
UCC 1 Financing Statement..........................................................................................................34
13.
STRAWMAN RECAPTURE COMPLETED? WHAT IS NEXT? ...................................... 35
14.
A WORD ABOUT POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND KIDNAPPING............... 37
15.
THE MANAGEMENT OF RELATIONSHIPS IN THE FUTURE....................................... 39
15.1.
The Safe Working Environment ............................................................................... 42
The Book
Public Information
Printed Date: 26/03/11
16.
AFFIDAVIT OF LAWFUL EQUALITY FOR A WOMAN................................................... 45
17.
AFFIDAVIT OF CHATTEL PROPERTY FOR A WOMAN TO A MAN............................. 49
18.
AGREEMENT OF MARRIAGE BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN ............................. 52
19.
THE ARBITRATION PANEL ........................................................................................... 60
20.
RESCIND YOUR PRESUMED CONSENT TO THE MARRIAGE CONTRACT ............ 62
20.1.
What about current assets? ..................................................................................... 64
21.
A WORD ON PROSTITUTION ....................................................................................... 72
22.
A WORD ON LAWYERS AND BARRISTERS ................................................................ 74
23.
A WORD ON THE SEXISM AND GENDER POLITICS OF WOMEN ............................. 76
24.
A WORD ON THE RULE OF LAW.................................................................................. 77
25.
WHAT DO WOMEN WANT? .......................................................................................... 79
25.1.
More Wisdom from Sue1 ......................................................................................... 81
26.
WHAT DO WOMEN NOT WANT? .................................................................................. 83
27.
APPENDIX A - ON WOMEN.BY ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER ...................................... 84
28.
APPENDIX B OH WHAT A BASTARD I AM ................................................................ 90
29.
APPENDIX C - DOCUMENTS ON WEBSITE................................................................. 93
30.
APPENDIX D - ABOUT THE AUTHOR........................................................................... 95
31.
APPENDIX E A FINAL WORD................................................................................... 101

The Book
Public Information
1.
CHANGE CONTROL LOG
Date
0.02
01/11/11
0.03
01/04/11
Name
Peter-Andrew:
Nolan(c)
Peter-Andrew:
Nolan(c)

The Book
Description
Initial draft version for pre-publication review by selected
people.
Initial full copy version being released to the general
population of men in the former British Empire.
Public Information
2.
LAWFUL NOTICE TO THOSE WHO WOULD SLANDER ME
This is a Lawful Notice to women and their mangina lackeys who would make up lies and slander me.
My calling, Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) and the strawman name PETER ANDREW NOLAN(c) is copyrighted world
wide. So is my image and all aspects of my human self.
Any woman or mangina lackey who uses my name, my calling or my image without my written consent signed in
red ink by my hand only is violating my copyright.
The cost of copyright violation PER VIOLATION is 1,000 troy ounces of 99.99% pure gold. So all of you women
and magina lackeys might want to consider that before you write your lies about me. I will pursue copyright
violations ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD so as to collect gold to be able to re-distribute to those I perceive as in
need. Nothing would give me greater pleasure than to take gold off women and their mangina lackeys and give it to
men who are struggling to raise their boys because of the oppressive nature of the western legal system today.
Any slander of me will be pursued ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD. So if you women tell lies about me and try and
slander me to damage my business you will be pursued. I will take your property off you as a point of honour.
If any woman wishes to make a rebuttal for anything I have said they are welcome to do so directly to me at
peter@peternolan.com on an Affidavit with a Notice of Intent and Proposed Remedy signed under penalty of
perjury and full commercial liability.
Apart from that? Im not interested in hearing what any women and their mangina lackeys have to say about this
book.
This book is for men who wish to live in freedom. Not women or their mangina lackeys.
This book is intended to save many millions of lives.
Those who slander me are working against my efforts to re-introduce the rule of law into Ireland and Australia.
Those who slander me are working against my efforts to expose the criminals in the guvment and legal fraternity.
I will not take kindly to that kind of slander.
Those who complain I am slandering other people. Grow up. The people I am slandering are criminals and
scumbags. They deserve to be exposed for what they are. If they have a problem with what I am saying? They can
create a common law court and see how they go with that.

The Book
Public Information
3.
WHY SAY THAT THE WEST IS A FEM-NAZI WORLD
I have decided to call this book Living Free in a Fem-Nazi World. A lot of people do not realise that Feminism is a
set of hate policies expressed as a political view and that it is almost exactly in line with Nazism. Women certainly
do not like being told that feminism and nazism are essentially the same thing.
Angry Harry pointed this out 7 years ago here:
http://www.angryharry.com/esFeminismandNazism.htm
Why do anti-feminists keep insisting that feminism and Nazism are very similar?
Well. The reason is this.
The Nazis were around well before the heavy-duty violence and the gas chambers. And for quite some time they
operated in a manner that paralleled in many ways the more recent activities of feminists.
Furthermore, feminist and Nazi ideology have a lot in common.
Very occasionally I receive an email saying that it is outrageous to compare feminism with Nazism - because it
somehow trivialises the terrible experiences of the Jews in the Germany of the 1930s.
But making the comparison does not do this at all.
It does the opposite.
It brings to the attention of people the kind of forces that gave rise to Nazism and, as far as men are concerned particularly the white ones - it makes them understand a little better the horribleness of discrimination and
demonisation.
Furthermore, most Jewish groups do not actually highlight the holocaust in order to gain everybody's sympathy.
They do it so that people can ****LEARN!****
They do it so that people can see if something heinous is creeping up on us.
Anyway.
Here are 30 similarities between feminism and 'early' Nazism.
Feminism and Nazism have both ...
1. Discriminated against individuals on the basis of their genetic code.
2. Promoted the view that the targeted group was inferior genetically and behaviourally, e.g. see AH's Men
Bear a Striking Resemblance to Slugs.
3. Promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being labeled as 'parasites', e.g. see AH'sSteven
Jones - A Parasite?
4. Promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being constantly ridiculed e.g. seeIncredible Shrinking
Y by Maureen Dowd
5. Promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being laughed at even when mutilated e.g. Bobbit
jokes.
6. Demonised the target group by labeling them as perverts and sexual criminals, e.g. see Put Up or Shut
Up by Wendy McElroy
7. Sought to break the target group away from their families e.g. see The Federal Bureau of Marriage?by
Professor Stephen Baskerville.
The Book
Public Information
8. Promoted the view that the targeted group was responsible for most of the major ills in society.
9. Disseminated lies and disinformation about the targeted group in order to further promote their own
ideology, e.g. see Msinformation by Professor Christina Hoff Sommers
10. Disseminated lies and disinformation about historical matters, e.g. see AH's Did Women Really Want To
Go Out To Work?
11. Used intimidation, threats and coercion to prevent their opponents from speaking out e.g. see
AH'sFeminists are nasty things.
12. Promoted the lie that the privileged group consisted of innocent 'victims' of the targeted group e.g. "women
have been oppressed throughout history."
13. Demanded special privileges in the workplace for members of the privileged group e.g. preferential job
placements for women
14. Discriminated against the targeted group in educational matters and in the workplace e.g. see AH's Well
Done the Girls?
15. Perverted the justice system so that members of the targeted group were easily discriminated against in
the law e.g. in family courts.
16. Arranged matters so that accusers from the privileged group could be shielded by anonymity in the
courtroom e.g. in sex-assault cases.
17. Arranged matters so that defendants from the targeted group had to 'prove' their innocence e.g. in sexassault and domestic violence cases.
18. Arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define what, legally, was to be
deemed 'a crime', e.g. where nowadays the 'feelings' of women rather than the behaviours of men are the
determinants of what constitutes 'a crime' e.g. see The Real Goal Of Feminism by Antonia Feitz - 18 min
19. Arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define how the law was to
view certain matters e.g. a fetus inside a woman can now be deemed by her - at her whim - to be a
worthless piece of tissue or a prospective baby - with all the ramifications of this - regardless of how the
father might feel about it all e.g. see AH's Rant Against the Child Support Agency. (Also sexual harassment
etc.)
20. Arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group more severely than members of
the privileged group for the very same crime e.g. in domestic violence and murder cases.
21. Arranged matters so that members of the targeted group were made responsible for the choices and
behaviours of members of the privileged group e.g. in paternity fraud cases where duped fathers still have
to pay child support.
22. Arranged matters so that members of the privileged group who harmed, or even murdered, members of the
targeted group were shown undue leniency - and were often actually applauded for their actions, e.g.
see Killer given domestic violence award and AH's Loose Women.
23. Arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group severely for even trivial offences
- e.g. domestic violence, sexual harassment.
24. Arranged matters so that members of the privileged group earned a right to the property of members of the
targeted group for no other reason than that they were members of the privileged group e.g. alimony, child
custody.
25. Arranged matters so that certain speech or attitudes directed against the privileged group were criminalised
e.g. biased 'hate speech' laws.
26. Demanded subservience to the prevailing ideology and to the government.

The Book
Public Information
27. Effectively controlled the mainstream media and the academic institutions and arranged for them to present
a dishonest and dishonourable point of view in support of their ideology.
28. Consistently highlighted and exaggerated the achievements and the suffering of the privileged group while
downplaying the achievements and the suffering of the targeted group e.g. see Human Rights are not for
Men by Melanie Phillips.
29. Ran government-funded educational courses in universities (e.g. Women's Studies, Title IX) and in schools
to promote the privileged group at the expense of the targeted group.
30. Persisted in a long term campaign of hatred toward the targeted group, e.g. "Women need men like a fish
needs a bicycle." "Men think about sex every 15 seconds." etc. Also see AH's Permanent Menstrual
Tension.
Bar the heavy violence and the gas chambers - which came towards the end of the Nazis hold on power - feminism
and early Nazism are surely very similar indeed!
Hermann Goering ... The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to
do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to
danger. It works the same way in any country."
Feminists ... The people can always be brought to the bidding of the feminist leaders. All you have to do is tell
women and children that they are being attacked (by men) and denounce those who protest as 'supporters of
abuse' and for exposing women and children to danger. It works the same way in any country."
Feminism. Nazism.
Nazism. Feminism.
The best interests of the child ...
The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is
perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty
and almost any deprivation.
Adolph Hitler in Mein Kampf
Feminism. Nazism.
Nazism. Feminism.
Thanks be to Angry Harry for carrying on the fight for so long!

The Book
Public Information
Gentlemen.
In the west today, a man who submits to guvment can be incarcerated without cause based on the lie of a woman.
He can have his children stolen, his house stolen, all his past earnings stolen, all his future earnings stolen.
Indeed, a white, Christian, heterosexual, father in the west today is treated more brutally and is regularly deprived
of more rights and property, namely his children, than was EVER the case for black slaves in the southern US
states during the slavery period or was the case for Jews in Nazi Germany prior to the outbreak of hostilities in WW
II.
It is NO EXAGGERATION to say that a white, Christian, heterosexual, fathers are the new Black Jews only that
they are treated MUCH WORSE than Blacks in slavery or Jews in Germany were treated until the outbreak of
hostilities.
In BOTH cases a man could not have his children removed even by those oppressive regimes. You men who read
this? You want to realise that you are the new Black Jew and that you are more oppressed than these men were if
you get married. Indeed, you can be more oppressed than these men were merely by a false allegation from a
woman.
If you wish to be this oppressed? Thats up to you. If you wish to do something about it? That is ALSO up to you.
No other man has any obligation to hold your hand or free you. You have to free yourself.
You can look into ANY NEWSPAPER on pretty much ANY day of the week and read stories about men falsely
incarcerated on the lies of women. Of men losing their children in divorce cases, losing lots of money in their
divorce cases, of false sexual harassment charges or outrageous payouts for sexual harassment which are many
times the payouts for soldiers permanently disabled in the service of their country.
You Sir, in case you do not know it, live in a Fem-Nazi world. Where women are the new brown shirts who so
enthusiastically call on the guvment to commit crimes against men such as steal their children, steal the proceeds
of their lifes work, steal their future income, steal their liberty, and in some cases, tragically, steal the very life of a
man.
If you do NOT know this is happening? Try this site www.the-spearhead.com.
This book is about freeing you from the fem-nazi, fem-fascist state you live in to live your life as you choose. This
book will show you how to no longer be subject to the fem-nazi legislation that claims you are a slave with no
rights at all.

The Book
Public Information
4.
A FOR WORD AND WARNING
Gentlemen, this book has been evolving for some time and has gone through a number of virtual re-writes in my
mind as well as some on paper. What you are now reading is the version that was meant to be. I wish to share
with you a little about what it is you are about to read.
I have referred to this as my book for over a year at the time I type this (October 2010). But for some reason I
didnt write that much. I was collecting a lot of things and cutting and pasting a lot of things but I didnt really put
them together. There was something missing. Just a few weeks ago my copy of David Ickes latest book showed
up and I eagerly read it. Even forgot to go to bed a couple of times while reading it. It turned out that there are quite
a few parallels in our lives that I did not know about before reading his latest book.
As I pondered over his latest book and considered all that had happened to me over the last three years it finally
became clear to me that this is not my book. Someone or something wants me to write this book and I am merely
the vehicle for the writing of the book. I can tell you, it was the weirdest feeling as I realised this. No. I dont know
who this someone or something is. I dont know if they are friend or foe dressed as friend. I do know that it is some
being or power well in advance of me. I would therefore encourage you to read everything I write with a critical eye
and not accept anything I say as truth. I would encourage you to look into your hearts and look into your heads
and determine what you perceive to be true, right, just and then act on that basis. I would encourage you to look
out into the world and validate everything I say for yourself. If you have evidence that something I said was not
correct? Please let me know. I would encourage you to take full responsibility for yourselves as sovereigns. It is
quite a humbling experience to realise that you are just the messenger but, as David notes, It is what it is.
At the same time it also became clear to me that the events of my life over the last three years, many of which I
didnt like such as the kidnapping and relocation to places unknown of my children, were events that had to happen
in order for this book to be written.
Over the last few years I asked God a few times: Why me? Why did my family have to be destroyed by my wife?
What is that all about?. Just the other week I got the answer. Because I WAS one of the very best fathers and
husbands. Because I am an honest man of honour and integrity. Because my word is above reproach. Because of
these I am the perfect candidate for having his family destroyed for no better reason than the greed of my ex-wife
Jennifer. Because I am a man with backbone who will not allow injustice to stand. I am the perfect candidate.
Indeed, as I read Davids book and noted how perfectly well he had been prepared to be the man he is and bring
the message he brings I realised that I have been exceptionally well prepared to write this book I am currently
typing. Indeed, I cant think of another man I know who would be a BETTER candidate to write this book. I will do
my best and other men can take it or leave it.
David Icke comments Infinite love does not always give us what we want. Hes sure right about that one! People
may question other things David Icke says, but on that one? Hes spot on.
So? What is this book about? This book is about freeing men from the slavery of the Illuminati control grid. Of all
the stuff I read out there? No-one has presented a solution. I have been wondering about this for ages. Why is noone presenting a solution? The closest is Michael Tsarion who, in one video of his I saw, noted words to the effect
We just need to walk away. Thats all we need to do.
Michael spoke about how the Illuminati are far more intelligent than us, far more technologically advanced than us,
and have been farming us for thousands of years. The idea we could somehow overthrow them by force or outthink them is ludicrous. He commented that the only real alternative is simply to refuse to be part of their system.
Just walk away.
And you know? Hes right. If a man wants to be free? All he has to do is walk away. Its THAT simple.
So. Thats what I did. I rescinded my consent to be governed and I declared myself sovereign and I walked away
from THEIR control grid as much as is possible in this modern world.
And that is what this book is about. This book is about giving men the tools to walk away. Just like I did. This
book? Should you use it? Will free you from the tyranny of the control grid. I wish you well.

The Book
10
Public Information
4.1.
What About The Zombies?
I want to also add a word on this hysteria of we must wake everyone up. In the alternative truth area there are
endless numbers of people saying we must wake everyone up. I happen to disagree. When I was young I learned
a saying:
Do not try and teach a pig to sing. It sounds terrible and annoys the pig.
When I walk around I see endless numbers of mindless walking zombies also known as people. If you catch the
tube around London like I have the last 2 years? You will see tens of thousands of these zombies going to work.
Once you are awake and you see this it is really an amazing sight. They are all chasing promissory notes.
For a long time I tried to wake the zombies up. I would sit with people and show them the promise to pay on the
British pound notes and tell them about how this is a promissory note and their own rules say you dont have to pay
anything to the guvment.
People would just glaze over and think I was a nutter. So even when you present the most concrete and
irrefutable of evidence the zombies are not going to wake up. Fine. Let then sleep walk in their slavery. This book
is for those few men who WILL take it and use it and liberate themselves. I think that number is about 1% of men.
Then, after some time, other men will start to notice and say:
Hey, hes doing pretty well, whats he got that I havent? And the answer will be knowledge.
I was over on www.the-spearhead.com for about 8 months. This is a place that claims to be Piercing the Shield of
Ignorance. I must have put 2,000+ posts into that place. How many men actually figured out what I was saying
was true? Three I think the number was. THAT is how asleep the zombies are. The zombies love their slavery and
they will not thank you for pointing it out to them.
Michael Tsarion makes the analogy that when you shine a light into the face of a sleeping person sometimes they
are not going to like that, even when its for their own good. Plato said the same in The Cave.
Men are now so dumbed down many of them are terrified at the idea that they might actually have to take
responsibility for themselves and can not look to the monarch or the guvment to protect and provide. Take a
look around you and you will see this. Lots of men think that their guvment pension is going to take care of them in
their old age. Men think their guvment is there to help them. I have no idea how men can be this stupid. Im not. Im
pretty smart but you dont have to be very smart to figure out your guvment is not your friend. After all, they kill
more people than anything else. No less than Ronald Reagan said:
The eleven most frightening words in the English language are I am from the government and I am here to
help.
I knew my guvment was not my friend when I was 20 and they introduced higher taxes on University Education
while claiming to be running a program for the clever country. I immediately picked up the hypocrisy that you cant
be claiming to be running a program for the clever country while you are simultaneously reducing the ability of the
best and brightest to be well educated.
I never voted left again because it was clear they were a pack of liars. Indeed the Prime Minister at that time was
Bob Hawke who was a Rhodes Scholar (Illuminati training school) and he was also a member of the Fabian
Society (Illuminati political left wing). Bob Hawke was an Illuminati puppet and thats part of why his lies were so
obvious.
John Howard was little less . It just turned out the right of politics are better liars than the left and they are all
controlled by the Illuminati anyway. GST killed any idea Howard was honest John. While I was in University I
discovered that the quality of education was so abysmal that it could not have possibly gotten this bad by
accident. I skipped the vast majority of my lectures because it was clear to me they were totally irrelevant and
most were pitched at your average 10 year old. What a waste of time my degree was. It was only later I realised
that the degree is a hurdle to overcome to see if you are going to be a good sheeple.
So. No. I dont think there is any future in running around saying to men wake up, you are a slave, do you want to
be free? Because most will deny they are slaves despite the fact that they must work 40 hours a week, 48 weeks a
year for 45 years. I mean really. If a man can deny he is a slave looking at those figures he can deny anything.
The Book
11
Public Information
4.2.
Going Forward?
There is no doubt in my mind that today most of the world is nothing but a totalitarian communist dictatorship with
the thinnest of thin veneers of freedom layered over the top. You have to admire the Illuminati. They have farmed
us like sheep for thousands of years and we are so stupid we dont know it! Thats pretty funny when you actually
get it. There is absolutely endless information on the web now as to how they have done this. Some names you
can put into your google searches are:
David Icke
Alex Jones
Henry Makow
Michael Tsarion
Eustice Mullins
Aaron Russo
G Edward Griffin
Freeman
Robert Menard
John Harris
These are pretty much the top bunch of people who have produced books and videos as to what is really going
on. You could not read all their works in a year if you studied them solid. But the evidence of the New World Order
and your slavery is all around you. Once you understand how money works you know how their bogus system
works. You should ask yourself the question:
Why is it that in all my life no-one has ever told me how our money system really works?
The answer would be. Because it is the money system that is the primary mechanism of slavery and they dont
want you to know how that works. Second behind the money system is the legal system.
How do those of us who dont want to be slaves any more get out of this control grid? Well? Its actually pretty easy
because the mechanism they are relying on is denial. Once you are out of denial its really easy.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Learn where do your rights come from.

Learn how to claim your rights.
Learn how to exercise your rights.
Learn how to defend your rights.
You do these four things? You are as free as you are ever going to be.
Now, David Icke talks about the entrapment in the 5 sense reality and how we can interconnected to the All. I am
not there yet. If I get there? Ill write more about it. This book is about freeing you from the control grid put in place
by the Illuminati. Which, in my opinion, is a really important thing for those who wish to be free.
Basically it all hangs on whether you want to be a slave or if you want to be a sovereign.
If you want to be a sovereign then be so.
All that there is to do is to choose to be sovereign and then be sovereign.
If you want to be a slave? Stop reading now.
If you want to be a sovereign and be free? Keep reading.

The Book
12
Public Information
5.
INTENDED AUDIENCE
The intended audience for Living Free in a Fem-Nazi World The Book are:
Men. Real Men. The ones who have their balls between their legs and not in their wifes purse.
(If you have your balls in your wifes purse, put this book down now. It will damage your brain.)
Men who are hard working, honest men of honour and integrity and you are wanting to make something
of yourself.
(If you are a liar, if you do not know what honour is, if you have no integrity, put this book down now. It will
damage your brain.)
Men who want to be the best they can be.
One time I had a sign on my desk. To be average scares the hell out of me. This book is not for guys
who just want to be one of the crowd. You want to be a sheeple? Be a sheeple. There are plenty of
them. If you want to be average? Put this book down now. It will damage your brain.
Men who are considering being in relationship.
Men who are considering getting married.
Men who are married.
(Hint. Your guvment marriage contract is a fraudulent contract. You can end it any time you like. )
Who this book is NOT for:
This book is not for dead beat men. If you are a dead beat you can throw this away now. In all likelihood
you are not a deadbeat because deadbeats do not pick up books like this.
This book is not for man-hating, white knighting, mangina apologists.

These men disgust me. I have no respect for them. I sure as hell would not write a book for them. So if you
are a man who automatically leaps to the defence of any woman who is upset? Go away. I dont want you
reading my best efforts. Go do something useful like throw yourself under a bus. Really. Just go away. I am
so sick of the likes of you. Ive heard all your rubbish. I said a lot of it myself up until three years ago
myself. I am as disgusted at myself as I was as I am of you.
This book is not intended for western modern women. If you are a modern western woman and reading
this book you might as well put it down now. You will only be offended if it does not burn your brain to a
cinder from the information presented.
And by the way. I dont want to hear from any western women with respect to what is in this book. Go write
your own books. Ive heard enough from you all. It was mostly crap and not worth listening to. I gave
women a good listening to and every chance.
You failed.
Note: Given this book is written in English the audience is limited to the English speaking world. Some of my
German friends have been concerned at my comments which they take to include Germany. I am told that German
Family Law is the fairest in the world. When I explain to my German friends the mass arrests happening in the
English speaking world they are shocked. Many outright dis-believe me that what I say is true. So if you happen to
be German and reading this? Germany is the western country that is NOT implementing family law similar to the
other western countries.

The Book
13
Public Information
6.
PURPOSE
The intended purposes of Living Free in a Fem-Nazi World The Book are:
To pass along one mans knowledge and experience such that the next guy might be able to use that
knowledge and experience and avoid many of the same pitfalls I fell into from ignorance and placing my
trust in women.
My Rule#01 is this. Never trust a woman.
I mean NOT EVER. If a woman tells you the grass is green? Check for yourself. If a woman tells you the
sky is blue? Check for yourself. The single biggest mistake I have made in my ENTIRE LIFE is to place
trust in a woman. ANY woman but mostly my ex-wife, Jennifer Toal. If women do not like that being
Rule#01? So what?
If they wanted to be trusted they should be honest. Its real simple. When you are honest your are
TRUST-WORTHY, note worthy. When you are a liar you are not TRUST-WORTHY. And women are the
consummate liars. Indeed, I have come to the conclusion that they can not tell the difference between fact
and fantasy. So it could almost be said they are not lying so much as incapable of being honest like
men are incapable of producing babies. Indeed, I dont hold women accountable for lying at all.
To save YOU the reader, a great deal of money. If you are a man who has an interest in money this
book will save you more money than anything else you could possibly read. You should be real
interested in that.
To give you, for free, everything you need to claim your freedom, your birth rights, and tell your fem-nazi
totalitarian communist guvment to get out of your life.
And yes, during the course of this book you will find out that all western guvments are fem-nazi styled
communist totalitarian guvments that enslave you via the monetary system.
To educate you in the ways of women such that you can notice the techniques of the trade that women
use to dominate, control, lie, steal, and generally make a mess of a mans life. They are clearly
identifiable.
Young men have a right to know these things. Have you young men every noticed that you are constantly
told how complicated women are and how hard they are to understand?
Well? I am near genius. I listened to women for 32 years, including my mum and aunts, to learn about
women to be able to better manage my relationships with women. Guess what? They ALL lied. And
because they ALL lied and told the SAME lies it sounded like the truth. More on that later.
Just remember a major portion of this book is about teaching you, young man, just how women go about
dominating and controlling you and then messing up your life.
To forewarn and forearm you with some small manner of defences against women.

The Book
14
Public Information
7.
SUBJECTS COVERED IN THIS BOOK
Closely linked to the Purposes of this book are the Subjects covered by this book.
This is not an easy book to read. If you want an easy book to read try Thomas the Tank Engine and be happy in
your slavery. Really. Who said a book on freeing yourself from the Illuminati control grid should be easy to read? I
didnt. So. Its not going to be easy. It was not easy for me. Its going to be a hell of a lot easier for you since I have
spent more than 3,000 hours learning this stuff and I will provide you pointers to lots of other books to read and
videos to watch, as well.
So. Here are some of the subjects of this book.
Women.
I am amazed how ignorant I was about women as a 44 year old. Really, really amazed. You see, I had
thought women were reasonably honest and I believed much of what they said. I had NO IDEA that they
were ALL in on the marriage and children scam and they ALL lie the VAST MAJORITY OF THE TIME.
One of the seminal events of my life was reading Shoepenhauers essay On Women. At first I was
REALLY angry no-one had ever showed me that essay before. Why was this essay not mandatory
readying for all young men? The reason was obvious. The young men have to be lied to in order to be
stupid enough to buy marriage and children. Shoepenhauers essay On Women lays women and their
lies bare. I have reproduced it in an appendix here and YOU are requested to take it on yourself to make
sure you give a copy to EVERY MAN YOU KNOW.
Shoepenhauers essay On Women should be the single most read piece of literature in the man-osphere.
The Illuminati Control Grid
There are MANY books on this and I will point to them rather than reproduce too much of them here. I will
include enough such that you can clearly see the control grid. It will then be up to you to go and read the
references and find out as much as you want for yourself.
How to get yourself OUT of THEIR control grid by performing a strawman recapture.
You will also be told about your rights. You will be taught the answers to the questions:
Where do my rights come from
(Hint: Not your fem-nazi totalitarian communist guvments though they tell you they are the ones who
give you your rights. It is a lie.)
How do I claim my rights?
How do I exercise them?
How do I defend them?
(Hint: Because as sure as hell your fem-nazi totalitarian guvments are NOT interesting in defending
YOUR rights. They are interested in you being THEIR slave. Period.)
Other things Illuminati and THEIR control grid and THEIR plans for you.
How to divorce your wife, your state (Hint: You married your state too only they didnt tell you), refuse the
jurisdiction of your satanic criminal courts masquerading as a just-us system, rescind your implied
consent to pay income taxes, mortgages and other lines of credit, dis-own your children, travel the world
free of pass-port constraints (still in progress), and go about living your life as a free man on the planet
your creator gave you to live on.
Yes. In common law countries, which is ALL the former British empire lands, you, my good man, can do
all these things perfectly lawfully. And you are well advised to do them. It is up to you what you do. I am
merely presenting information for your consideration. What you do with that information is up to you.

The Book
15
Public Information
8.
HOW ARE MEN ENSLAVED?
Something that most people never actually take the time to stop and think about is the answer to this question:
How are men enslaved?

I am amazed to see that almost NO-ONE has the balls to actually answer this question. You can read all the books
you like by the leading researchers and none of them will tell you just exactly how men are enslaved. I find it
interesting in itself that this is totally omitted.
To make it very, very clear how men and women had to be socialised by the Illuminati I developed a little
anecdotal story. Of course we do not know if it is true or not. The Illuminati may have done things differently. But
the effect is the same. In this story I merely credit the elders as the Illuminati.
8.1.
The Woolly Mammoth Story
20,000 years ago Og and Ogette lived in a little society that had found a nice big cave to live in and they were all
very happy cave people. Each day the young men went out to make war with the woolly mammoths to see if they
could bring home the bacon. One fine morning Ogette kisses her man Og as he goes off to do battle with the
woolly mammoth. She tells him how much she loves him and cares for him and how much she admires him for
bringing home food for the children. Young Og is filled with pride and good feelings about his important role of
feeding his wife and children. He is the picture of a good husband, father and citizen in this little tribe.
The young men tromp off with a few of their number left to guard the women and children from the roaming sabre
tooth tigers with nary but some pointed sticks for defence. These young men are expected to fight the sabre
toothed tigers who might wander by, to their death if necessary. If they fail in this duty and do not die in the effort
they know they will be killed by the men returning from the hunt. So basically they are taking on a mission to the
death to protect the women and children. Notice no women are required to defend the women and children to
their death. Not even old women who are past birthing age because, you know, despite the latest claims of equality
and feminism from some other nearby tribes the women in this tribe know that the men are stronger and that being
equal might see them as dinner for a sabre toothed tiger!! Right?
Anyway, night falls and the young men return from the hunt. They have successfully killed and dissected a woolly
mammoth and have brought home food for a month. There is great joy and celebration in the cave. The sacred fire
is stoked to cook the meat. Ogette is all happy at the prospect of food for herself and her children and searches for
her man Og to thank him but she can't find him. Oh where is my beloved Og? Where is my beloved Og?
She is soon told that Og, valiant and brave, had fallen victim to the woolly mammoths stomping foot during the kill.
He has died to bring food to his wife and children. All the young men shout praises to the dead Og and his bravery
and he is remembered in song. They cheer him and drink some of this funny stuff that they just learned how to
make out of fruits that makes them feel good and sing his praises all night. (But Og is still dead. Don't miss that
point.)
Ogette mourns the loss of her man....for a short while....basically until one of the other strong young men who does
not have his own woman offers her some food and they start chatting. If she is to have food for herself and her
children she has to align herself with a man. It's that simple. Welfare has not yet been invented. All the women
know, and have known for 20,000 years, that a womans affection must be immediately transferable. Its always
been that way because it HAS to be that way.
The plain fact of the matter is that for the last 20,000 years men have died young in war and work and it was
necessary for the woman to be able to transfer her affection to another man who would feed her and her children
very easily. So much for how much women love men. They don't. It is a lie. They love the food and shelter that
men provide. And when that is all taken care of they will have diamonds and 5 bedroom houses too. But a woman
loving a man? There is no need for it so it does not happen. Anyone who has been in the divorce courts can see
for himself how much women love men and how much they love what men provide. BIG DIFFERENCE. If you
have evidence to refute the abuse of men in the divorce courts? Feel free to write your own book and publish it.

The Book
16
Public Information
But what of the young men? Well? A strong young man does not need to kill a woolly mammoth to feed himself. He
can go and catch a rabbit or two and do quite well. Why in hell would he risk his life to kill a woolly mammoth when
he can feed himself quite easily with almost no effort on his part?
Well, the OLD MEN of the tribe know that in order for THEM, the women, AND the children to be fed the YOUNG
MEN of the tribe have to do all the work of collecting food. So the OLD MEN of the tribe brainwash the YOUNG
MEN of the tribe into the idea that THEIR SPECIFIC WOMAN is SOMEHOW SPECIAL and that the most
honourable thing he can do is labour as best he can to feed HIS woman and children. Oh...and he has to pay
taxes of a little meat so the OLD MEN who are organising everything can be fed as well. Right?
So the OLD MEN invent love and they brainwash the YOUNG MEN into love and devotion and dedication and
commitment and honour and integrity all those nice words that we hear shoved downs mens throats so often
but which women know full well do not apply to THEM. After all, a woman can break her wedding vows and commit
perjury with complete impunity, right? It is a womans prerogative to change her mind, right?
And so the young Ogs are sent out to make war with the woolly mammoths with little more than pointed sticks
because, if the old men, the women and the children are to be fed and the overall group is to survive or thrive it
simply has to be done. If a few young Ogs die that's not a problem because it's always possible for one of the old
men to take on the onerous duty of impregnating the unmarried women for the good of the tribe and to raise
taxes to make sure the children are fed. Right?
The fact of the matter is that the young men are considered expendable by everyone except themselves.
The only reason they do not suspect that they are considered expendable is because they are
brainwashed.
Sounds like soldiers to me. Therefore, what is most essential for a woman is to find one of the young men who has
been appropriately brainwashed and indoctrinated by the old men into believing that the best thing he can do is find
love with that special woman who he will marry and have children and he will labour for the love of his life for
the rest of his life no matter that be short or long. Hhhmmm...that would describe ME perfectly in 1984 when my ex
first hit on me! I was a very good selection for her! LOL!!
Young man. The truth is this. The old men or the Illuminati have known that the way to enslave men, to be willing
to work hard and risk their lives, is by using the women to do so. It has always been that way. It does not always
need to be that way. Now you are reading this book you can be one more young men who refuses to be enslaved
by the Illuminati by way of a complicit woman.
And something very important for you to know young man? The women have been very well aware of this set up all
along. I was really surprised to find that out. In my life, ALL the women told me the same lies so they sounded like
the truth. Women tell the lie that women will love a good husband and father and would never treat such a man
poorly and would never injure his children. Women are consistently painted out as goddess while men are
consistently painted as evil and bad.
This is the story of the enslavement of men. It has been this way since the serpent persuaded Eve to take the
apple and then SHE persuaded Adam to partake of the Apple, her already having done so. It turns out, and it was a
surprise to me, that women are coldly calculating and manipulative and they are in full support of the Illuminati
enslaving men. Lots of women will hate me for saying that. Fine. Please present your evidence it has ever been
any other way.
This is why women vote left and vote for big guvment. Ann Coulter has even made the statement that women
should not have the vote, and she would be happy to give up her vote if all women did, because when women get
the vote what they do is plunder the finances of the guvment to create welfare states. There was a play created by
the Greeks called Assembly Women where the women snuck into the Assembly with fake beards on and
introduced a communist state. It was presented as a comedy. So the communistic nature of women has been well
known for at least 2,500 years. It is not news to those who run the world.
Young man. The MEN at the top want you to be their slave by working 40 hours a week, 48 weeks a year, for 45
years or so. Then they tax you to live off you like parasites. And the sad thing is that our women entirely agree
with this idea. They are willing accomplices.
This book will show you how to hold women accountable and stop them from being the accomplices of the
Illuminati.
The Book
17
Public Information
9.
WHAT IS THE SOLUTION?
Now. I have made it clear that Jennifer Toal committed the crimes of perjury, kidnapping, extortion and theft. I have
also made it clear that the split of money was 5% vs 95% and that my overall take from 25 years of work after legal
fees was MINUS EUR40,000. This is all called legal today. I have posted the source documents proving all this to
my web site at www.peternolan.com and I have also posted the you-tube video of my court-meeting with David
Dunkley.
It is obviously clear that the courts are totally bogus. It is just as clear by Kevin Rudds refusal to discipline his
employees that the guvment is just a bogus.
So. What is the solution? Well? Im glad you asked me that because I spent a bloody long time learning how to
create one and then testing it. You are the beneficiary of this. You are welcome.
I said up front there was four things to be done.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Learn where do your rights come from.

Learn how to claim your rights.
Learn how to exercise your rights.
Learn how to defend your rights.
This is going to be so simple you are not going to believe it. But its the truth.
1. Learn where do rights come from.
They come from YOU. YOU define what YOUR rights are going to be. Now. You may believe in God or
some form of Creator and you can declare your rights according to your beliefs from your creator. The
only thing you need to keep in mind is that your rights end where another mans rights start.
Most men think their rights come from the state. This is a big mistake. If you think your rights come from
the state then you are a slave. The state is nothing but a bunch of MEN who are trying to enslave you and
rob you and live off you as parasites. They do this by offering you help and then sucking you dry to give
you this help once the help has become obligatory. Virtually every piece of the control grid was initially
sold as helpful. Money? Government? Religion? Medicine? Law? Police? Newspapers? TV? All sold as
helpful or beneficial from the Illuminati which now rule the lives of billions.
2. Learn how to claim your rights.
You just state them. Thats it. You SAY what your rights are and BINGO they are your rights. To
communicate your claimed rights and to make sure that no-one else who presumes jurisdiction over you
have a problem with your rights. The only thing you need to remember is that if you claim to be able to do
something that involves someone else you are required to have their agreement. So YOUR rights can
only apply to YOU. You could say I have the right to kill but you might find that those you wish to kill might
have something to say about that.
3. Learn how to exercise your rights.
You just use them. When you have claimed a right then you exercise it by using it. If you claim the freedom
of speech you go out and you speak freely. If you claim right of travel then you go out and travel freely.
When you are impeded you explain your rights and your claim and you ask the other person for a signed
affidavit under penalty of perjury and full commercial liability for the law that they say gives them any right
to infringe your rights.
Without said affidavit? They have no right to interfere with you. If they do then it is time to:

The Book
18
Public Information
4. Learn how to defend your rights.

The primary mechanism to defending rights is for the accuser to complete an Affidavit and present it to the
accused. You will see many examples of this linked in the appendices of this book. The mechanism I have
used is to create an affidavit with a Proposed Remedy and a Notice of Intent that goes with it. I outline that
I reserve the right to convene a de jour jury and a de jour court and try any dispute under common law.
Of course, the problem comes when the PTB simply run roughshod over you. My own personal opinion is
that I am not at all adverse to defending my rights with force up to and including deadly force. I played
plenty of football when I was a kid and I rather enjoyed the violence of full contact sports. A little bit of
violence towards people who infringe my rights? No problem. People who attempt to condemn me for that?
Thanks for sharing. You can stop reading now.
Those people who are shrieking about non-violence are the women and guvment. And how many women
have called the cops to use force against a man? MILLIONS. Those who are responsible for the VAST
majority of violence against men by authorities are the same people shrieking about how the people they
are committing violence against should be non-violent. All men should denounce anyone who has EVER
used violence of themselves, any convenient mangina, or of the state who is now claiming non-violence, as
hypocrites.
I have never had to use violence off the football field since I was a boy. However, I reserve the right to use
violence, and I mean ANY level of violence against ANY HUMAN who might cause me injury, harm or loss.
And those who deal with me know this.
I was in Bucharest a while ago and three men attempted to rob me of my laptop. Once I realised what the
were doing I stepped back and told them I knew they were trying to rob me and if they did I would chase
one of them down and I would beat him to death. And they could see I meant it.
Of course, the three of them could over-power me to take the laptop. But if I chased one of them it was
obvious I could catch any individual one of them. So they, very sensibly, decided a 33% chance of being
dead was not good odds for a laptop. If I had been non-violent I would be out one laptop. Later, still in
Bucharest I was attacked by 6 wild dogs. I barked them out of the idea of attacking me without a single
tool/weapon at my command. If I was not able to communicate to those dogs that they were not wise to
attack me I might be dead. In Bucharest the odd tourist does get attacked by dogs and killed.
So yes. I am perfectly capable of violence and I have no problem being so if some person or animal is
attempting to injure me.
I rebut the non-violence claims of the tree huggers. They say they wish non-violence yet they are using
violence against tens of thousands of men daily.
It is not until men make it clear to women that a woman being violent to a man is no longer acceptable that
men will be free of the enslavement visited on them by women.
My position now is that if an equal woman hits me? I WILL hit her back. If any mangina then comes to
defend the aggressor? He will be hit as well.
Its about time the manginas also learned that their white-knighting behaviour is also not acceptable to
men.

The Book
19
Public Information
10.
HOW DO I CLAIM MY RIGHTS?
The most important document you will ever write out is your Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of
Right. You can read mine here:
http://www.peternolan.com/LinkClick.aspx?link=PN_Affidavit_Intent_Claim_of_Right.pdf&tabid=538&mid=1230
This is a document in which you write down the rights you claim for yourself. You are a sovereign and you get to
decide what rights you have. The first thing that you must do is to make it clear to those you have failed to rebut as
having the right to govern you up until now. When you were little, before you could think for yourself, your parents
told you that you had to do what the guvment told you to do. Most likely. When you were around the age of 18 you
were offered a guvment benefit called income tax. This is usually offered to you when you get your first job. They
present their offer of income tax to you like this:
In order to have this job you MUST apply for a social security number (of some sort including the Australian Tax
File Number) and you MUST pay income tax.
Hmmm. What does must mean there? You think they are speaking English because that sure sounds like English.
Nope. They are speaking legalese. The language of the Law Society. Are you a member of the Law Society?
Nope? Well then they are not speaking a language you can understand or comprehend. But they dont tell you that.
They wait until you respond. If you interpret MUST as the English meaning compelled to and you apply (beg) for
the benefit of paying income taxes? Well thats YOUR choice. Thank you your guvment says You just begged to
be our slave. You see, in commerce, it is assumed that if you beg you know what you are begging for. So when
you were about 18 you begged the guvment to be a slave for the benefit of being able to PAY INCOME TAX. Silly
you.
I should add one word on negative assertion because its not normal to speak like this. In negative assertion you
make the claim that you have seen no material facts or evidence of some item and that puts the onus on the
OTHER side to present you with that evidence or material facts. If they do not do so then you have every lawful
right to honestly believe that no such evidence or material facts exist.
So. The first part of your NOUCOR is to refute their claims and presumption of having any right to govern you. You
can see this in my example where I state things like.
9. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that there is any statute law that
evidences a man or person shall be convicted of an offence in respect of an act or omission in obedience to the
laws for the time being made and enforced by persons in de facto possession of the sovereign power in and over
the place where the act or omission occurs, without Principals consent, and believes that none exists
10. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that representation
does not require mutual consent, and believes that none exists
11. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that neither
representation nor governance can exist without mutual consent, and believes that none exists
12. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that Principal is not
desirous to live life with love, compassion and truth, and believes that none exists
This places the burden of proof back onto the guvment to present material facts or evidence that shows that I, the
human being, spirit of a man, have any obligation to be governed and can be subject to any statute law without my
consent.
This is sent off to the Illuminati Shills commonly called Queen Elizabeth and her guvments. They are given a
reasonable time frame to respond. If they do not respond then you send along your default judgement. Because
they had an opportunity to counter claim and did not use it the default judgement puts in place a permanent
estopple stop and no lawful case can ever be brought against that human being for exercising any right that they
have claimed on the NOUICOR.

The Book
20
Public Information
The next important part of the NOUICOR is to establish your free man status. So you present the claims that there
is no evidence you are not a free man, that there is no evidence that living in my community standards breaches
the peace, that there is no evidence I am the NAME on THEIR Berth Certificate, that there is no evidence that
acting as a friend to the corporations of COA and NSW is NOT ok, and lastly, to claim that if an action can be
licensed it must therefore also be lawful.
This is done as follows.
21. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that the free man on
the land commonly called Peter-Andrew: Nolan is not a Free Man and believes that none exists
22. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that acting peacefully
within community standards breaches the peace, and believes that none exists
23. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that he does not
reserve the right to NOT be recognised by the name on the Berth Certificate, and believes that none exists
24. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that acting peaceably
within the community standards and as a friend of the STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES and THE
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA does breach the peace, and believes that none exists
25. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that any action for
which one can apply for and receive a license is not a fundamentally lawful action, and believes that none exists
Some more key phases which will be explained one at a time are as follows:
This claim is to establish that I have seen no evidence that I am not an adult operating in full responsibility.
26. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that Principal is not a
Free man standing in Gods Kingdom, who operates with full responsibility and not a child nor sees the need to ask
permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and believes
that none exists
This claim is to establish that I have seen no evidence that by laws are just rules of corporations.
27. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that a by-law is not
defined as a rule of a corporation, and believes that none exists
This claim is to establish that I have seen no evidence that corporations are legal fictions and that they require
contracts to claim authority or control over parties. It is not stated but an implied claim is that a party is also a
fiction.
28. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that corporations are
not legal fictions and do not require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and believes
that none exists
This claim is to establish that I have seen no evidence that corporations alive, are human, or have any lawful
authority over any man.
29. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that legal fictions have
a soul or life and are capable or have lawful authority to exert any control over the free will man on the land, and
believes that none exists
This claim is to establish that I have seen no evidence that any corporation can levy any taxes for me to have the
enjoyment of my property.
30. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that Principal does not
have a prior right to use his property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and believes that none
exists

The Book
21
Public Information
This claim is to establish that the Commonwealth of Australia is a corporation. How about that? It also establishes
that I am not subject to any of the rules also known as legislation, laws, statues, of the COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA. It is a corporation. Why should I let a corporation tell me what to do?
31. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA is not a corporation and registered in the UNITED STATES with registration
number 0000805157 as recorded on the US Securities and Exchange Commission website and that it is no
different to any other corporation such as K-Mart or General Motors; and I, a free man on the land, standing in
Gods Kingdom am bound by any of their laws, policies or taxes, and believes that none exists
This claim is to establish that a summons is an invitation to attend and no obligation to honour it exists.
34. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that a summons is not
merely an invitation to attend and that those issued by any Australian corporation create any obligation or
dishonour if ignored or refused for cause without dishonour, and believes that none exists
This claim is to establish that peace officers have an obligation to keep the peace and that they have an obligation
to distinguish between statutes and laws.
35. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that peace officers do
not have a duty to maintain the peace and to distinguish between statutes and law, and believes that peace officers
have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law, and believes that none exists
This claim is to establish that peace officers who attempt to force statutes on me are breaking the law.
36. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that those peace
officers who attempt to enforce statutes against a Free man standing in Gods Kingdom, are not, in fact, breaking
the law, and believes that none exists
This claim is to establish that I have no obligation to interact with peace officers if they have not witnessed me
breech the peace.
37. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that Principal does not
have the power and lawful right to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed
Principal breach the peace, and believes that none exists
This claim is to establish that the bond of PETER ANDREW NOLAN is enough to insure me against any unforseen
circumstances.
38. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that I, the free man on
the land commonly called Peter-Andrew: Nolan does not have certified copies of the supersedes bonds/Birth
Certificates issued to me by the Registrar of Births, Deaths, Marriages, New South Wales, Australia, and that said
bond instrument would not be sufficient to satisfy any obligation or debt created by New South Wales State created
entity PETER ANDREW NOLAN including sufficient insurance for the purpose of travel by automobile should there
ever be an unintentional collision or other liability whatsoever, thus totally negating the necessity of State of New
South Wales license plates, and believes that none exists
This claim is to establish that a permanent estoppel is sufficient to rebut any later claim against whatever it is that
the permanent estoppel is claimed against as long as sensible and reasonable time is given to respond.
39. Principal has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows that permanent
estoppel by acquiescence does not bar any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman
under any Act created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time, and believes that none exists

The Book
22
Public Information
And this is the final claim to declare I say I will live peacefully and that no corporation has any right to force any
statute onto me.
Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, the free man on the land
commonly called Peter-Andrew: Nolan standing in Gods Kingdom do hereby say clearly specifically and
unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully live my life as I so choose and pursue whatever livelihood without
being molested and journey in my private car(s), truck(s), or any other moving unit without any license and/or
registration - free of all statutory obligations and restrictions while maintaining all rights at law to trade, exchange or
barter .
This claim establishes the right to place a lien over the property of any human being who steals my property.
Should anyone attempt to confiscate or steal my property after being served this claim of right, will be held privately
and personally liable and charged with theft. They will also be in agreement to me issuing a lien over their property
and assets.
No man should forget this claim. The reason is obvious.
In addition I may wish to own a gun and reserve the right to do so for the purpose of hunting for sustenance,
protection or recreation without any license or registration.
This is my claim that if anyone interferes with my lawful activities having been served notice of this claim and does
not properly dispute this claim is breaking the law and will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure.
Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this
claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or
colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure.
This is my claim that the courts are merely defacto and bound by the law and equity act of the COA and transact
security interests. That is. They have no jurisdiction.
Furthermore, I claim that the courts in New South Wales are de-facto and bound by the Law and Equity Act and are
in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I
see no material evidence or facts to suggest otherwise and I dont believe it exists, and I further claim they require
the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.
This is my claim that all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and that I do not
consent and that I rescind my consent for all such future transactions.
Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny
consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a free man standing
in Gods Kingdom I am not subject to any Act.
This is my claim of Freedom of Speech.
Furthermore, I claim my creator has gifted me with a mind and the ability to speak and hear and therefore He
intends that I have the right of freedom of speech and freedom of thought and freedom of expression and freedom
to hear other of His creations with no restriction and no limitations apart from Honouring He who created me.
This is my claim of Freedom of Travel.
Furthermore, I claim my creator has gifted me with two strong legs and a mind that can navigate and therefore He
intends that I have the right of freedom of travel across that portion of His creation known as the Planet Earth with
no restriction and no limitations apart from Honouring He who created me.

The Book
23
Public Information
This is my claim of self defence up to and including deadly force against those who would injure me or those placed
in my care by my creator.
Furthermore, I claim my creator has gifted me with consciousness, life, two strong arms and a mind that can use
these arms with power and precision and therefore He intends that I have the right to defend from harm or
aggression myself and those He places in my care with no restriction and no limitations apart from Honouring He
who created me.
This is my claim that I can not be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not
enter knowingly. I need to add, in red ink to signify the living man. That is coming in an update of this claim.
Furthermore, I claim that I may not be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did
not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally, without full disclosure and fixed terms and conditions atop my
signature knowingly and consciously made by my hand.
This is my claim that I do not accept any liability for a compelled benefit or of any unrevealed contract or
agreement.
Furthermore, I claim that I that I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or
commercial agreement which are my rights pursuant to common law.
This is my claim for my fee schedule. It is self explanatory I believe.
Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or
agents or justice system participants is ONE TROY OUNCE of 99.99% PURE GOLD PER HOUR or portion thereof
if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and FIVE HUNDRED
TROY OUNCES of 99.99% PURE GOLD PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported,
incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarised consent.
This is my claim for my fee schedule for copyright infringement. It is self explanatory I believe.
Furthermore, I claim my fee of ONE THOUSAND TROY OUNCES of 99.99% PURE GOLD for any and all
unauthorized use of the fictitious corporate name PETER ANDREW NOLAN or my calling Peter-Andrew: Nolan
and all its derivatives each and every time it is used without my permission which can only be given in RED INK
signed by MY HAND ONLY.
This is my claim for my fee schedule for copyright infringement. It is self explanatory I believe.
Furthermore, I claim that all combinations of the fictitious corporate name PETER ANDREW NOLAN or my calling
Peter-Andrew: Nolan and all its derivatives are subject to a Common Law Copyright agreement with the fee
schedule as stated above and such Copyright is valid for use of the fictitious corporate name PETER ANDREW
NOLAN or my calling Peter-Andrew: Nolan and all its derivatives for that portion of the Kingdom of God
commonly known as the Planet Earth.
This is my claim for That I can use a Notary Public to regain money owed by free schedule transgressions.
Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE
against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any
way.
This is my claim that I have a right to convene a proper court de jure to address any criminal actions against me by
guvment principals or agents.
Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions
of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who, having been served
notice of this claim, fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with
the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.
This is my claim that I the law of agent and principal applies to my communications.
Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.
The Book
24
Public Information
This is my claim that any disputes can be discussed in open forum and can be captured on video and or sound to
use for any lawful purposes I see fit. This is how I video recorded my court meeting and was able to place it onto
you tube and to do that lawfully.
Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using
discussion and negotiation and to capture as electronic video and sound said discussion and negotiation for
whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.
Your NOUICOR is very likely the most important document you will ever write. You are well advised to spend some
time on it. If you can get someone to review it then do so. But even if you do get someone to assist you it is YOUR
claim of right. You can update it as you learn so its not like it is set in concrete. But each update should be renoticed to those who would claim jurisdiction over you. Maybe an update every few years makes sense.
And by the way? I always recommend men offer to pay other men to help them. Time is money so if you intend to
ask the men in the free man area to take you through this process offer to pay them a reasonable amount for that
help. Not all guys are like me. I can afford to spend 3,000 hours of my own time on something like this because I
make plenty of money. More than enough to take care of myself. But I can only spend that time on being at the
sharp edge of this process. I cant afford that time helping men on the routine paperwork that goes with this
process. And once I have done all I can do I will go back to my real job.
Now. What is written here is ALL YOU NEED to claim your rights as a human being. If you wish to eject and get
rid of your corporate strawman this is enough. You then be a sovereign man and you go out and you do your
thing. You defend yourself via the mechanisms you have claimed in your claim of right.
If you dont want to travel across national boundaries and dont want a bank account? This is enough. If you want
to interact with THEIR public system? Then you might want to do a strawman recapture.
Personally, my opinion is that Strawman recapture is the better way to go so as to be able to continue to effectively
operate in THEIR public system. It is what I chose to do. However, it does take more time.

The Book
25
Public Information
11.
THE DEFAULT JUDGEMENT
Something that all men should be intimately aware of is the concept of a Default Judgement. The best way to think
of this is as follows. If you present an affidavit as a Lawful Notice to another human being and you state what is
true for you and you give them an opportunity to object to your statement of truth or your claims of right they have
the lawful obligation to respond to anything they object to. If they do not object they are accepting the Lawful
Notice, affidavit, or claim of right.
You need to know there is a hierarchy in effect here as well.
1. The Lawful Notice is a lower level document than an affidavit.
A Lawful Notice is simply a document to notice someone of a situation and to ask for something in return
as a proof of claim for what you have noticed the human being about. A Lawful Notice is simply an
upgraded letter asking for a response.
2. An Affidavit is the highest level lawful document there is. When you are presented with an Affidavit you
have a lawful obligation to rebut anything that you say is not true. If you do not rebut a point you accept
the truth of that point. And you NEVER get the opportunity again to reject that point of truth.
The way I use them is then like this. When I just want to tell someone something or just ask for proof of claim then I
sent them a Lawful Notice. I am not making this notice under penalty of perjury or full commercial liability so I can
then afford to be more relaxed in the presentation of what I am saying. I am not particularly liable for what I am
saying other than slander and since I dont slander people there is generally no liability created with a Lawful
Notice.
Similarly, there is no compelling reason for a person to reply to a Lawful Notice unless they consider that something
said in the lawful notice needs to be replied to. There is no need to rebut what is in a lawful notice unless it is
asking for proof of claim. If there is no proof of claim requested its just a notice telling the other human being what
it is you intend to do if the other human being does not reply.
The default judgement can do with either document. If your Lawful Notice asks for a proof of claim and the other
human being does not provide you your proof of claim inside the period you specify, which must be considered
reasonable by a jury if needs be, then you can issue a default judgment against your request for proof of claim for
failure to provide proof of claim.
Should you present an Affidavit and/or a claim of right and points go unrebutted then you are entitled to issue a
Default Judgement against your Affidavit. There is some confusion about Notaries Public in this situation. Many
people hold the opinion that these documents must be Notarised by a Notary Public to have lawful standing. I
disagree with this opinion. A sovereign is his own highest authority and needs no other human being to counter
sign for his statements of truth. Similarly, should there be need for a jury to be convened a sovereign does not
need someone else to speak for him or write for him or sign for him. The idea that a sovereign NEEDS someone
else to do something to have access to anything is absurd and denies his sovereignty. The test I always use is this:
Would anyone expect the Queen to do this to be able to make this claim?
For example. If the queen were to fill out an Affidavit and three people countersigned to say that it was, indeed, the
queen who applied the queens signature, would anyone believe she ALSO needs this to be notarised? No. They
wouldnt. And if its good enough for the Queen its good enough for me because I am on the same lawful level as
the queen. She claims she is the sovereign of England? I claim I am the sovereign of me. So I will use the same
techniques as her. You can too if you like.
When preparing your Lawful Notices, Affidavits, Claim of Right and Default Judgments keep in mind at ALL times
that what you are REALLY DOING is preparing evidence to be presented in a de jour court before a de jour jury of
12 honest men of honour and integrity. As long as you prepare your documents honestly and openly and you put
them in plain English that any common man would be expected to understand you are going to do ok in the court.
Dont be taken in by all the gobblygook and complexity that people talk about. The lawyers and judges try to
confuse you to create a dependency on THEIR services by claiming justice is complex. Justice is not complex.
Dont forget that.

The Book
26
Public Information
There are a lot of men with opinions as to what is right and what is wrong on an Affidavit. I do not subscribe to
these opinions so much. A man writes out what he believes to be correct in good faith, and if there is ever a
dispute he tells the jury what it was he meant at the time. The jury will judge him to be honest about that or not. The
jury will NOT be applying a whole bunch of rules written by someone else about what is right or wrong and will
not be told by a judge what it right or wrong. They are to decide that for themselves.
So, back to the Default Judgement. Once you have given another human being a fair and reasonable time to
respond to you. And you may also use a Notice of Opportunity to Cure in a second notice or not. After this time
you have a lawful right to issue a Default Judgement.
The Default Judgement merely mentions the previous efforts to obtain agreement, notes that no response or
whatever response, has happened, and notes the Default Judgement.
Here is an example that has descriptions inside the text. As you can see, it is actually a very simple document but it
is a very important document.
Label all the people you are sending the default judgement to.
To:
The woman holding the throne of David and acting as
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II,
Queen of the United Kingdom
and the Commonwealth
Buckingham Palace
London SW1A 1AA, United Kingdom
Michael Jeffrey, acting as
The Honourable Major General Michael Jeffery
Australian Governor General of the Commonwealth of Australia
Government House
Dunrossil Drive
Yarralumia, Australian Capital Territory
Australia
Kevin Rudd, acting as The Honourable Kevin Rudd,
Prime Minister of Australia
Parliament House
Canberra, Australian Capital Territory
Australia
Robert McClelland, acting as The Honourable Robert McClelland
Attorney-General
Attorney-General's Department
Central Office
3-5 National Circuit
BARTON
Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2600
Australia
And all heirs and successors to all the above.

The Book
27
Public Information
Referencing:
Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right

I think it is a good idea to provide the receipt numbers. Some people are including self addressed postage paid
envelopes enclosed so that the those who receive the notice simply put the self addressed envelope into the return
post when the notice arrives. A scan/photocopy of the self addressed envelope and then the holding of that
returned envelope is also excellent evidence that the notice was delivered. .
With British Mail Registered Mail Receipts as Follows:

Buckingham Palace
Receipt: ZV850251414GB
Government House
Dunrossil Drive
Australia
Receipt: RI774749458GB
Parliament House
Australia
Attorney-General
Central Office
BARTON
Australia

The Book
28
Public Information
NOTARIAL NOTICE OF NON-RESPONSE

AND DEFAULT JUDGEMENT
To date you have given no response to the Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right issued
by registered mail as follows dated September 23rd 2009 written by the claimant addressed by the
calling of Peter-Andrew: Nolan a Free man, within the twenty day time period. (Printed copies are
included for your information.)
I think it is a good idea to be repetitive.

Buckingham Palace
Receipt: ZV850251414GB
Government House
Dunrossil Drive
Australia
Parliament House
Australia
Attorney-General
Central Office
BARTON
Australia

The Book
29
Public Information
This Notarial Notice is to advise you that your failure to respond has resulted in an automatic default
judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges
under any statute or Act against Free man Peter-Andrew: Nolan.
_______________________________________________________
Autographed
Peter-Andrew: Nolan
Principal and Claimant
All rights reserved
Done this...................Day of the Tenth Month of the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Nine Anno
Domini, (22nd October AD2009) near London, England.
KNOW all men that I, _______________________ of London, England, at the request of Peter-Andrew:
Nolan , there being no notary public readily available, did on the Twenty Second Day of October 2009
Anno Domini, witness this NOTARIAL NOTICE OF NON-RESPONSE and DEFAULT JUDGEMENT and
the above autograph of Peter-Andrew: Nolan before
_____________________________________ and
_____________________________________.
Yours Faithfully,
By,
.
(Autographed)
All rights reserved.
Witness 1 ...
Date: .
Witness 2
This document may be used in a Judicial Proceeding

I think it is a good idea to make it really clear that this may be used in a Judicial Proceeding to prove that every
effort was made to give the human beings time to respond and to rebut claims made.

The Book
30
Public Information
12.
HOW DO I PERFORM A STRAWMAN RECAPTURE?
There are services to do this and I assume that these services will improve. If they improve over time then you
would be well advised to spend your money and use such a service. I am giving you what I did for you to work
from. Period. I am not agony aunt and Im not going to spend a lot of time taking men through this. As I said
above. If you want help? Ask someone who is proficient in this to help you and pay him for his time. I have spent
enormous amounts of time on men who have shown very little interest in actually being useful.
12.1. Why Perform A Strawman Recapture?

I travel a lot. The robots at the Border Controls are often dumber than rocks. Really. They are not doing that job
because they are PHDs. They are nice guys and they are doing their best and I am by no means insulting them.
But if you are going to be sitting at the border patrol for many years there has to be a reason for it. I also notice that
in the UK they are using more and more women at border control and that can only spell trouble.
So, when you roll up to Border Control and start explaining to them that you have a God given right to freedom of
travel, or that you have conducted a lawful process of permanent estoppel with the leader of his country such that
he has no right to interfere? Well? Good luck with that. So passports are something useful to have. I have two. One
from Australia and a World Passport. So far the World Passport has not been accepted. I am working on that.
So, the main reason I wanted to keep my strawman is to maintain my passport. The other BIG reason is to maintain
bank accounts. In case you havent noticed? Try buying something on line without a credit card now. Not easy.
They are trying to make the control grid so pervasive that you simply cant function without it. However, they HAVE
to provide remedy unless they are going to be caught promoting slavery. Their legalese gobblygook is what they
use to get people to believe they have to do stuff.
So it seems that maintaining the strawman and separating yourself from the strawman gives you the opportunity to
operate in commerce in the normal way that all the robots are familiar with while creating a lawful and legal
barrier between you and the strawman. This basically means you gain the benefit of using THEIR public system
which is funded from your BOND against your Birth Certificate while not being subject to THEIR corporate rules,
legislation and statutes.
12.2. Components of a Strawman Recapture

There are a number of components to a claim of right. They are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Certificate of Sovereignty
Deed of Evidence
Common Law Copyright Notice
Hold Harmless Agreement
Private Agreement
Security Agreement
UCC 1 Financing Statement
Each of these items will be discussed in detail in the following pages.

I want to acknowledge Arthur Cristian and his great site www.loveforlife.com.au. Arthur has been fighting these
guys for a long, long time and has amassed an enormous amount of materials on his site. I could not have done
this without referring to his materials. Thank you Arthur.
I got the skeletons for all these from here. http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6169
Instructions for completion from here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6168
Please refer to these instructions as they may be updated.

The Book
31
Public Information
There are a number of components to a claim of right. They are as follows:
12.2.1.Certificate of Sovereignty
The Certificate of Sovereignty contains your Declaration of Sovereignty. This is a way of documenting and
communicating to other people that you have declared that you are a Sovereign. Remember, you are Sovereign
when you BE Sovereign. Sovereignty is a way of being, not a set of documents, and it is very important that you
understand that. Filling out some paper work is not going to help you face down a policy enforcement officer or a
magistrate. What is going to help you face down a policy enforcement officer or a magistrate is to remember that
you are the Sovereign and they are your servant. And you do not allow them to act in any other way than as your
servant. Treat them like you would treat your maid or your butler in your house.
The Certificate of Sovereignty also binds you to discharge truly and faithfully your common law duties to your fellow
men. That means if you are signing this Certificate of Sovereignty then you are OBLIGING yourself to the common
law. You are OBLIGING yourself to stand up for the common law and stand up for justice. That means you are
OBLIGING yourself to serve on juries if you are asked.
12.2.2.Deed of Evidence
The Deed of Evidence is a tool to create the evidence of the Strawman. Basically it says that if the Berth
Certificate has been considered the Strawman in the past that this Deed of Evidence now declares that this piece
of paper and extracts from it are the only legal evidence of that corporate strawman. If someone wants to talk to
PETER ANDREW NOLAN(c) I can give them a certified copy of this Deed. I believe I can also give them my Berth
Certificate as well. But I think giving them one of these is better.
12.2.3.Common Law Copyright Notice

Ok. Your name and your calling? Who owns it? You might say The guvment or you might say well, no-one. You
would be wrong. YOU decide what you are going to be called and you can call yourself anything you want. So, lets
say for convenience sake you will continue to use the name your parents gave you. Did you agree to a contract
with your parents as to your name? No. You were a baby. You couldnt agree to ANYTHING back then.
So. Your Common Law Copyright Notice is a Notice to say that you are now taking copy right title of your name,
your calling, any derivations of such, as well as all images of yourself and your DNA, your bodily parts etc. You
claim you own everything about you and it is all YOUR copyright because YOU own you.
Also, importantly in these days of forced vaccinations. You are claiming you can not have anything put into your
body as it is copyrighted as your body. This would also be covered in your claim of right where you have the right to
self defence up to and including deadly force.
I also created a Notice of Methods of Communication which cites my Copyright Notice and Notices that people can
communicate to me in writing under certain conditions. They can write to the Juristic Person or to the human
being. To make it clear that they have communicated to who they think they have communicated to they have to
address the two differently. I then respond from the point of view of who they have addressed.
Any breech of copyright once a human being has been noticed of the existence of the copyright, and since mine is
in the public at my personal web site that means whoever wants to write to me has an obligation to find out if my
name is copy righted. However, thats a little vexatious and so I always send my Notice of Methods of
Communication and make sure that the other party has a chance to know my name is copy righted.
Now. I have not collected on a copyright infringement. But I sure hope to!! My ex brother in law, Michael Toal, has
been a pain in the neck lately and he has been using my image without my consent and that is copyright
infringement.

The Book
32
Public Information
12.2.4.Hold Harmless Agreement

OK. The Hold Harmless Agreement is an Agreement whereby the debtor, PETER ANDREW NOLAN(c) and the
creditor Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) enter into an agreement whereby the debtor indemnifies and holds harmless the
creditor for any claims that are made against the debtor.
This means that the human being can not be reached by any claim that is against the debtor, the strawman. This is
quite cool because it means that when I use my Strawman Signature, which is what is on my passport and credit
cards for example, then nothing I do there has any legal ramification for me. It is buyer beware time and the
buyer must inform himself that he is taking the signature of a corporate fiction. This could be used maliciously but I
wouldnt recommend that.
If a human being wants to contract with you in the private then you can use your human being autograph. I have
noticed in some places the human beings signature is consistently referred to as an autograph. I have not got to
the bottom of that. But in any case. As long as you can make a mark that you recognise and is difficult enough to
copy then thats a good signature/autograph for your human being. I recommend that you make your human being
signature SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT to your strawman signature and make sure people know which legal or
lawful party they are dealing with.
The Hold Harmless Agreement is the one to use to rebut the presumption that the Strawman that the police come
looking for has got anything to do with you as the human being. It doesnt. And your Strawman signed an
agreement to say so.
When the cops come. And they will. This Agreement is what you need to give them. Also? I think its a really good
idea to go down to your local police station and hand them over all this paperwork and tell them that you know
about all this and that if the head of the local police station orders any of his boys around to kidnap you that you will
hold the head of the station liable. That way you can make sure he tells ALL his boys to leave you alone.
You tell him you want to live in peace etc but tell him kidnapping is considered NOT ok.
12.2.5.Private Agreement
The Private Agreement alters the status of the Debtor to being a Transmitting Utility. It notes that the Creditor is the
source of value for the Debtor such that the Debtor can engage in commerce. This transmitting utility is important.
It is creating the agreement that the Debtor can act AS the Creditor for all actions that the Debtor needs to
undertake and that any remuneration that comes back to the Debtor can be transmitted through to the Creditor.
On your UCC 1 Financing Statement you also need to note that the Debtor is now a Transmitting Utility. Dont
forget that bit.

The Book
33
Public Information
12.2.6.Security Agreement
The longest agreement of all is the Security Agreement. And this is the one you want to spend a bit of time on. I
know its hard to believe and understand in the beginning.
The Security Agreement delivers ALL property of the Debtor across to the Creditor. It then creates a large debt to
the Creditor and names the Creditor as the Primary Creditor and Secured Party. The property is enumerated just to
make sure that its clear what is covered. Not every bank account needs to be named but just that Bank Accounts
in the Debtors Name should be specified.
By creating the debt and naming the Creditor as the Primary Creditor and Secured Party the Creditor is then first in
line for payment. This means that if someone else comes along with a claim for money from the debtor then they
have to get in line. Someone like, the guvment for example.
Things are transferred across such as Passports, Tax File Numbers, Bank Accounts and the like. This then
transfers all the property you THOUGHT was yours but was not across to you. The fact is that since you have been
signing documents using the authorised signature against THEIR strawman all you have ever been doing is
transferring money from one of THEIR accounts to another of THEIR accounts. Did you ever own anything? No.
You didnt. This is how the state seizes property. You never owned it in the first place. They use a whole lot of
legalese that you dont understand and tell you ignorance of the law is no excuse. Then when you feel threatened
and frightened you hire a liar/lawyer who pretends to be your friend but is anything BUT your friend and when you
hire the liar/lawyer you waive all your rights and declare yourself a ward of the state and the pirates plunder you.
How about that?
So by having the Security Agreement transfer THEIR property across to YOU and for you to hold under a common
law claim then YOU own that property and you hold it under the law of thou shalt not steal which implies your
property rights. And you can punished those who steal your property.
So. Spend some time on this Security Agreement. Its important.
12.2.7.UCC 1 Financing Statement

Lastly? You must complete a UCC 1 Financing Statement. There are any number of web sites that will allow you to
register a UCC 1 Financing Statement. As according to the instructions on Arthurs Site I went here:
https://fortress.wa.gov/dol/ucc
It took me a couple of goes because I kept doing the data entry incorrectly. This was one of the WORST web sites I
had ever seen in all my years of working. I hope it is better by the time you use it.
My understanding is that the UCC 1 Financing Statement is simply the registration of your contracts in a public
place so that people may be reasonably expected to find it. You have the rights you have declared and you have
the contracts that you have written but for people to have a reasonable chance to know that you have done this
then the fact you have done it needs to be registered. I had thought it was another claim thing. That if no-one
rebutted your claim that it then stood. I now believe that is not correct and that it is truly just a place to publish the
fact you have done this without needing to publish your whole set of contracts. In my case I have published my set
of contracts and the UCC 1 Financing Statement onto my personal web site now.
I spent some time with a non-de plum but I always knew I would have to come out as I was going to try and put
the judge and magistrates on trial and they have the right to confront their accuser. So before I made my name
public these documents were made public in the name of John-Doe.
Once you have registered your Financing Statement you can make claim that any person claiming against you had
ample opportunity to inform themselves.

The Book
34
Public Information
13.
STRAWMAN RECAPTURE COMPLETED? WHAT IS NEXT?
Ok. Once you have set up your strawman recapture, you have completed your NOUICOR what is next?
Well? You will wanting to be exercising your rights. And there are some people dressed in nice blue clown
costumes wearing the Masonic symbol of the checkerboard on their hats that are going to be wanting to try and tell
you that you cant do that. These are the policy enforcement officers of whatever corporation that claims to run the
land you are living on.
In my case I didnt bother going to see the local police officers because I dont really live in one place. And this
was all very new to me at the time. After consideration I believe it is a good idea to go and see the local station
commander once you have completed this paperwork and explain to him that you are no longer the JURISTIC
PERSON he assumes you to be.
I think it is important to explain to the local police commander that you really do want him to be a peace officer in
your community but that you no longer wish him to be a policy enforcement officer for the corporate policies being
enforced on other people to also be forced onto you.
I think it is a good idea to explain to him that if he orders any of this policy enforcement officers to apply the
corporate policies to you that you will hold the officer himself responsible for his actions as well as the station
commander who issues the order responsible.
The next step is to go about exercising your claimed rights. Whatever it is that you claimed as your rights, go out
and exercise them.
Sooner or later some of these policy enforcement officers will attempt to violate your rights. You need to
understand who you are and how you are to interact with these policy enforcement officers.
You need to make sure that you have your fee schedule in place and then you need to make sure that the policy
enforcement officer is well noticed and advised of your fee schedule.
This is my fee schedule. Id suggest you do something similar:
Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals
or agents or justice system participants is ONE TROY OUNCE of 99.99% PURE GOLD PER HOUR or
portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated
and FIVE HUNDRED TROY OUNCES of 99.99% PURE GOLD PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am
handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written
and Notarised consent.
Should the policy enforcement officer actually violate your rights then you will have to process remedy. It is
important for a sovereign to always be aware that at ALL times it is YOUR responsibility to make sure you gather
evidence to bring into a court such that you are able to provide evidence to gain a conviction should the other party
commit perjury and deny the truth.
And make sure that when you bring Affidavits and accusations against someone you tell the truth. The rule of law is
predicated on sovereigns telling the truth on Affidavits and perjury is a crime that will be punished.
Update: 2011-03-26. I have lawfully noticed all peace officers in Ireland and Australia with respect to certain
elements of this book and what they may not lawfully do.
Australia
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/australia/Forums/tabid/82/forumid/97/threadid/159/scope/posts/Default.aspx
Ireland
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/ireland/Forums/tabid/105/forumid/96/threadid/149/scope/posts/Default.aspx

The Book
35
Public Information
So, lets say that you do have your rights violated by one of these policy enforcement officers or the legal fraternity.
What do you do then?
There is a well defined process that has worked for a thousand years or more.
1. You write out an affidavit of truth documenting what the situation was.
2. Include in this document the Notice of Intent.
i. The Notice of Intent is a document that is best included to tell the other part as a lawful
notice what your intentions are. Usually this will include such things as reserving the right
to form a common law court and empanelling a de jour jury to hear the matter.
3. Include in this document the Proposed Remedy.
ii. The Proposed Remedy also sometimes called Opportunity to Cure, is a document that
describes your offer to the other party to admit to the accusation and then to make a
remedy that is REASONABLE for the crime that was committed. It is VERY important that
you offer that you offer the Proposed Remedy and that it would be perceived as
REASONABLE by a jury of 12 men. This Proposed Remedy will be presented to the jury of
12 men to show them that you made a genuine effort to settle the matter outside of a court.
You then present this document to the Respondent. You give them time to respond etc. If they do not respond you
create a default judgment. You might also give them an Opportunity to Cure. However, I do not see the need for
that. If the presentment goes to the other person properly then you have done all you can be expected to do.
Once the default judgement is created and also issued you can also do things like create a de jour jury or go
through the sheriffs office. This is where we are up to. The ability to get a Remedy Instruction or some such device
out of a de jour jury. When we get there we will see how that goes.
On my web site you can see many documents as I have described here in my own cases. They are presented for
your educational purposes. You are welcome to read them to comprehend them and use them should you choose
to do so.
Update: 2011-03-26. I have created the draft procedure manual for The Peoples Court of Australia and it will soon
be released here:
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/australia
We are proclaiming into existence The Peoples Court of Australia on 15th April 2011.

The Book
36
Public Information
14.
A WORD ABOUT POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND

KIDNAPPING
There are some unscrupulous thugs calling themselves Policy Enforcement Officers. This is shortened to Police
in many western countries. These men are scum. The worst kind of scum. Because they are employed to be
Peace Officers and to Protect and Serve and instead they are allowing themselves to be the willing and complicit
tools of oppression of their fellow men.
My disgust for these men knows no bounds. Even the honest ones because they are not ringing the bell.
I have spoken to a small number of them and they pull their bullshit about how they are being helpful but if you go
into the role they are really playing then they will start their bullshit.
Here are my thoughts for men on how to deal with these scumbag men who are willing and complicit in enslaving
you while lying to you can telling you they are protecting you.
If you claim your right to defend your freedom then you are going to have to defend it when these scum try and
kidnap you. My recommendation for men on how to deal with this situation is as follows:
1. Create a small group of some 5 or 6 men.
The reason the group is to be small is that this avoids infiltration by Illuminati Shills..
2. Each man is to swear an oath under pain of death to defend the life, liberty and property of the fellow
members of the group. This oath is up to and including deadly force to defend each mans right to life,
liberty and property.
3. Acquire deadly weapons and DO NOT REGISTER THEM. Let no-one know you have these weapons.
Most especially NOT your guvment.
4. Learn how to use these deadly weapons.
5. One nominated man from the group go down to your local Policy Enforcement Office and lawfully notice
the commanding officer that should he issue an order to falsely kidnap any free man, or should he issue an
order to unlawfully remove property from a free man that HE WILL PERSONALLY BE HELD
RESPONSIBLE for this crime.
Make sure you tell this man that MANY MEN are armed with deadly weapons and that they will have NO
HESITATION IN USING THEM if the station commander allows ANY infringement of a free mans rights as
claimed by that free man.
And you make sure you tell him that those who willing to carry out such unlawful orders will ALSO BE
SUBJECT to summary justice dealt out by the militia of the Free Men. Tell him to make DAMN SURE that
he passes that message around.
It might even be a good idea to video record the entire discussion and post it to You-Tube.
Now. What rights might you claim in dealing with these Policy Enforcement Officers? This is what I claim.
I claim that their policies only apply to THEIR tradmark. If they would like to arrest THEIR trademark they can print
a copy of my Deed of Evidence and put it into a cell for as long as they like. Its on my web site here:
http://www.peternolan.com/LinkClick.aspx?link=Deed+of+Evidence.pdf&tabid=538&mid=1230
I also claim that if a Peace Officer wishes to arrest me then what he needs is a human being accusing me of a
crime. That human being must be willing to create, or already have created, an Affidavit signed under penalty of
perjury, full commercial liability, with proposed remedy and notice of intent, prior to the peace officer calling on me.

The Book
37
Public Information
Should such an affidavit be presented the Peace Officer is obliged to accompany me to a magistrate who will state
his oath of office before me and enter into the bond of his oath of office to hear the testimony of this other human
being under oath as well as my rebuttal under oath. This is all to be performed on the record and under common
law jurisdiction because I claim common law jurisdiction.
The Magistrate may not deprive me of my freedom unless the accusation is so serious that I would be a flight risk
and that there is substantive evidence that I was indeed guilty of such a crime. Since I do not plan on committing
any such crimes there will be no such evidence. One persons testimony rebutted under oath is not evidence.
So. My question to any Peace Officer trying to do anything with me is as follows. I suggest you also choose some
similar statement.
Son, do you have an Affidavit with an attached Proposed Remedy and Notice of Intent signed under penalty of
perjury and full commercial liability making an accusation of a crime against me?
Or do you have a human being making oath to you that they will complete such a document?
If no? You are hereby lawfully noticed that any attempt to kidnap me by force is punishable by force up to and
including deadly force at the time and place of my choosing.
Son. You kidnap me? You are putting your life at risk. Now. Go get your paperwork in order.
And, of course, if you need to live up to the promise of summary justice against one of these scumbag criminals
calling themselves Policy Enforcement Officers? The way to do that is to ensure that one of the men you have
taken oath with delivers on his oath while you are FAR AWAY and have an irrefutable alibi. You need to remember
that in such a situation NO CRIME IS COMMITTED. The Policy Enforcement Officer was lawfully noticed that you
claim the right to use deadly force at the time and place of your choosing should he kidnap you thus violating your
right of freedom. You do not make the claim that it must be you do deliver on that Lawful Notice. And no other
Peace Officer may investigate the situation since no crime was committed.
Once a few Policy Enforcement Officers have had summary justice dealt out to them, and let no man forget that
these scum have been killing plenty of men themselves so no sympathy can be afforded them, they might choose
to stop being Policy Enforcement Officers and start being Peace Officers again. THEIR CHOICE.
When I was a kid there was a kid in my football team whos Dad was a Peace Officer. He was a really nice man
and he was a pillar of the community. I am more than happy to pay men to be Peace Officers and they will have my
gratitude and respect for being Peace Officers. It is a very important job.
However. I despise Policy Enforcement Officers like the pair who came into my house at my wifes invitation and
assaulted me and kidnapped and incarcerated me based on a lie by my wife. Those men are scum. They are no
better than the German Soldiers who put people into gas chambers or ovens saying I am only following orders.
If our Peace Officers had been men of honour and integrity they would have refused to violate mens right to life,
liberty and property. They are not men of honour and integrity. They are scum. They deserve to be labelled the
scum they are. They can redeem themselves by choosing to be Peace Officers once more.
And Gentlemen? ANY MAN who can bring an Affidavit of an alleged crime committed by one of these scum known
as Policy Enforcement Officers will also be give a path to justice from courts that are created in Ireland and
Australia. It is the responsibility of each man to ensure he is acting lawfully at ALL TIMES even when acting as a
Policy Enforcement Officer of a private corporation just the same way as the burger flipper from McDonalds is
required to act lawfully. Just because a man is given a blue clown costume and a gun does NOT put him ABOVE
the law. Indeed, if anything, because he is given a deadly weapon he has MORE RESPONSIBILITY to make sure
he is acting lawfully.
So. This is my advice to men about kidnapping from scum calling themselves Policy Enforcement Officers. Make
sure you defend yourself from them by oath of a small group of men, make sure you have weapons that can be
used to back up that oath, make sure you communicate this to the senior officers. Then go about your business.
And deliver on your oath if you ever need to.
Have no concern or sympathy for these men who would enslave you. They made their bed. Let them sleep in it.

The Book
38
Public Information
15.
THE MANAGEMENT OF RELATIONSHIPS IN THE FUTURE
There are many people talking about relationships all around the western world. With the collapse of the marriage
rate, the number of children born out of wedlock going on to being criminals, the drug problems, the divorce rates.
There is not a thinking man in the western world who is not aware that there is something seriously wrong in the
world today with respect to relationships between men and women. Try www.the-spearhead.com.
This has been by plan. It is part of reducing the number of people on the planet and it is well documented. The
short story is this:
1. The Illuminati want to cull back the population back to 500M people. Thats what they say. And the people
that say that are some very powerful and influential people. They are not to be automatically dis-believed
just because what they are saying is un-believable. Just start with Georgia Guidestones
2. In order to more effectively manage the people the Illuminati started the two world wars. The problem was
that these wars did not reduce the population quickly enough for the liking of the Illuminati. They are
currently trying to get World War Three started. (see www.threeworldwars.com ).
3. The next step was to decide to destroy the family. The destruction of the family would leave people more
easily managed, more easily culled/killed if needs be. So immediately after WW II the assault on the family
started in the west. At this time the first propaganda about how women should be looking forward to the
prince charming wedding was started. For example the Walt Disney movie Cinderella.
4. The next steps were things like the introduction of the Pill to liberate women from the oppression of child
birth and being required to be very careful before marriage, best abstaining, so that accidental pregnancy
does not take place. The introduction of feminism included such things as free love which was actually
documented in the communist manifesto, the programming of the home is the comfortable concentration
camp, the programming of women in the house were brain damaged and suffering from the disease with
no name. Those who bother to read it can see that the Communist Manifesto said that the nuclear family
had to be abolished and children had to be raised by the state to ensure equality.
5. In 1974 the UN promoted through the Council for Population Control in Bucharest the idea that all member
states should ensure equal outcomes in the public work place for men and women. Following on from this
meeting in 1974 the ENTIRE WESTERN WORLD re-wrote their family laws in the subsequent 12 years. In
Australia the Family Law was re-written in 1975. Many men will read this from Australia. At that time there
were huge political and social issues. The labor government had come to power for the first time in 20+
years. Vietnam was ongoing and there were marches in the streets. And inflation rates were high. Yet. In
this turbulent time what did Komrade Gough Whitlam and his band of cronies do?
They REWROTE THE FAMILY LAW (Legislation).
6. The Illuminati ordered the re-writing of the legislation of most western countries to introduce positive
discrimination for women. However, if there is positive discrimination it begs the question, who is this
discrimination against? Well? That would be men. By the early 80s we were starting to see the quota
women turning up in jobs all over the place. And men said Ok, we will let you come in and see how you
go. Alas, what then happened was that when women under performed in the work place it was not
politically correct to actually speak about womens poor work performance.
I recall this when I first started working in 1982. When the female trainees that were my peers would do
university work and not the work that they were allocated to do no-one would talk about this and no-one
would point out to the females that this was stealing. When I asked about how this could be I was called
sexist!! Apparently if a man asks a woman to do her job that she is being paid for he is sexist!! This call of
sexist has been going on in the workplace for AT LEAST 28 years that I am PERSONALLY aware of.
This experience has been repeated to me by men ALL OVER THE WORLD.
7. Following the re-write of the Family Law the divorce rate spiralled all around the western world. There was
also the introduction of welfare for these women who were no longer being supported by husbands. And
not long later there came draconian laws to make dead beat dads pay. This has all gotten so out of hand
that suicide by men in divorce is around 8-10x higher than the suicide rate of women.
If women are the ones who are so disadvantaged? Why it is the men killing themselves? Hhmmmm.
The Book
39
Public Information
So? If you go out into the world and take a look around you will find that relationships between men and women are
in disarray. You will see that men are walking away from long term relationships and marriage in their droves. And
rightly so. I was one who was criminally abused for more than three years at the time of writing (Now March 2011).
And when I sought justice not only did virtually ALL western women hurl abuse at me for wanting a path to justice a
LOT of MEN did too. I am one of perhaps 100 MILLION such men.
Whenever we allegedly complain for wanting justice to be done we are abused. Gee. Thanks a lot. For me this
has gone on for three years. I have worked my arse off for 2.5 years and spent a great deal of money and a great
deal of time figuring out how to gain remedy. Not one woman has helped me. I have just this week, after more than
2.5 years, had the first woman say I will help you as best I can. That was a really pathetic effort from our women
folk. When I point this out they call me sexist some more. Gee. Women have not changed their shrieking calls in 28
years and what they do is every time you reveal their treachery they scream sexism at you. Its about time western
women made a different call.
This book is written for MEN and no women are invited to read it.
And this section answers the question for a man.
I am being severely discriminated against and I am labelled a sexist if I complain about this
discrimination. Relationships with a woman are like walking on egg shells. What is a possible remedy?
The next section of this document is about remedy. And remedy is so simple it is awesome.
The major problem today, apart from the Illuminati wanting to kill 90-95% of the worlds population, is that they are
pursuing this agenda via the practice of offering the women the babies and money from the men by force the state
via the taxation system. Effectively, the Illuminati are offering men as state-tax-man-slaves to the women and
women are buying that deal in their tens of millions.
So? What is to be done to stop this system. Simple. Rescind your consent to be governed. As you have seen
above. And STOP PAYING INCOME TAXES. Their income taxes are payable by THEIR person.NOT YOU.
Their income taxes are only payable on the PROFIT from THEIR JURISTIC PERSON. NOT YOU.
So. If you refuse to participate in THEIR system you can refuse to be bound by THEIR rules. Now, its important to
understand that by refusing consent to be governed does not mean that you can NOT still take advantage of
THEIR system that was created for you by YOUR DELEGATES FOR YOU. You have every right to access the
strawman by being the primary creditor and secured party of the strawman. When you want to sign something as
the strawman then you sign the strawman name. When you sign something as the human being you sign your
human being name.
Many men will be happy with that. Just ignore the system. But most men are actually required to interact with
women in their public life and some men, like me, actually also wish to interact with women in our private lives.
The issue with dealing with women in our private lives is that women are not held to account for their actions. A
woman can commit murder and reasonably expect to be given only a nominal punishment. A woman can commit
perjury and no-one will do anything. This includes the western womans right to commit kidnapping, extortion and
theft with total impunity and this is totally supported by the Family Law court and usually supported by the
manginas around the women.
So. The next step in the solution is to establish the lawful position of the women in your life. And YOU are
RESPONSIBLE for establishing the lawful position of the women in your life. If a western woman in your life says
dont you trust me you are best advised to give the answer no. If she acts all hurt? Bad luck. If she did not stand
up for men by denouncing women committing common law crimes during the last 30 years? Why not? And if she
decided to trade her credibility for the privileges being accorded women by way of crimes? Well it was SHE who
decided to waive HER credibility.
So? How do you determine what the lawful status of a woman is? Well, you have to ask her. And how do you ask
her in such a way as to make it lawfully binding? You ask her to create an Affidavit and give you a certified copy or
to place a certified copy of her Affidavit into the public domain.
Now. Women in your life are going to be FURIOUS about being asked to do this and they will come up with the
normal 101 excuses. Just IGNORE them all. If she tries the one of why dont men have to do this? you can reply
because men have always known that they are equal before the law to other men.
The Book
40
Public Information
So what tools are available? Surprisingly today? None. These had to be created .
The first Affidavit I have created is for a woman to claim lawful equality for the woman. These Affidavits are what I
have called a BONDED Affidavit. Its like a BONDED oath. It is making a statement of what the woman believes to
be true and what she will do in the future with respect to how she will deal with men. If someone can show a
situation where the woman has violated her oaths of the Affidavit the plaintiff can present an Affidavit for the
infraction under oath. If the Affidavit is not rebutted the bond is forfeit. If the Affidavit is rebutted it is a matter for the
common law de jour court to progress. Could this be done better? Maybe. I would welcome other people to create
sample documents that can be added to my website or placed into web sites for men to use.
When I say lawful equality I mean lawful equality and waiving all privileges. This is important for you to
understand. Today women enjoy enormous privileges over men and they always have. If they wish lawful equality
to men then men will rightly insist that all privileges are waived and that men have no obligations to offer privileges
to women as men commonly do today.
For example? How many women change flat tires? Almost none. They always get the nearest man to do that.
Well? Thats not equal. Thats a privilege. A woman has no right to have a man-slave change her tire.
The unique idea that I propose is that YOU MEN who see these manginas extend privileges to women who claim
equality but demand privileges? You then TELL the MEN that you have no respect for them and you refuse to have
anything to do with these MEN because they are also the agents of your betrayal.
If a man allows a woman to claim equality and then also offers that woman privileges?
HE IS NOT YOUR FRIEND. DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH HIM.
I propose that men ask women to put forward an Affidavit to say whether they are claiming lawful equality between
men and women or whether they are claiming what might be called the traditional status of women which, since
they have claimed they were oppressed as the chattel property of men I am giving it exactly the same name as
they gave it.
I propose that men give women they interact with a CLEAR choice as to the lawful status they wish to select.
Now? The interesting bit is this. ALL men have a right to refuse to interact with any human being that they do not
know the lawful status of. So, if women are NOT willing to make a public statement as to their lawful status, ALL
men have a right to tell that woman he will not interact with her in any way because he does not know her lawful
status. And please do not forget her legal status is irrelevant to this conversation. What is relevant is her LAWFUL
STATUS.
This also means that any man who employs a woman? He has EVERY RIGHT to transform his company from a
company to an association (because a REGIS-tered company is owned by the GUVMENT and you do NOT own a
company) and then ask all the women he employs to complete one of the two affidavits to establish her lawful
position. If a woman refuses to establish her lawful position an employer has EVERY RIGHT to terminate
employment opportunities with his company. She is an Occupational Health and Safety Risk.
A good example of this is the whole issue of false sexual harassment. Very large numbers of women have made
false sexual harassment claims in the workplace and have then claimed ludicrous amounts of money to address
hurt feelings. Should a woman claim equality then she will agree to hear such cases in front of a de jour jury.
Should the allegation be found to have knowingly lied in the accusation then she forfeits her bond to the man she is
making the false allegation to. Simple. She lies under oath committing perjury? She pays. Big time.
In all these cases the woman is required to sign an Affidavit and be liable for punishment to perjury so as to
establish her lawful status. Should she refuse to establish her lawful status, which is fine, men are well advised not
to interact because of the uncertainty of relating to her lawful status and her actions.

The Book
41
Public Information
15.1. The Safe Working Environment

There is also the issue of safe working environment. In all western countries there is legislation in place that insists
that employers offer a safe working environment. Who has NOT heard of Occupational Health and Safety?
Well? If a woman does NOT define her lawful status she is NOT SAFE to work with. She can make a false
allegation and she will not be punished. That means YOU, the man, are being subjected to an un-safe working
environment.
What can you do about this? You can create a Lawful Notice whereby you notice your employer that you insist that
all those whom your employer wishes you to interact with in the course of HIS business have lawfully declared their
lawful status. It is not necessary for men to do this since men know they are equal before the law and subject to
jury trial should they commit a crime. However, women claim they are not equal before the law and women claim
that they have a right to make false allegations to the vast detriment of the man with complete impunity.
Since this is the case men in the workplace are very well advised to create letters to insist that they will not work
with any other human being who is not subject to the law just like they are.
An example text of such a letter is as follows. The idea is to claim common law jurisdiction by way of noticing the
human being and the agent and placing the common law notice at the top of the letter.
You are simply lawfully noticing your employer that you believe you are being asked to work in an unsafe working
environment as you could be falsely accused of any number of crimes by a female employee who would enjoy the
benefit of not being subject to remedy for her crime of perjury.
You are proposing two solutions and offering your employer the opportunity to also make a proposal in return. You
are letting your employer know that should you suffer any injury, harm or loss via a false accusation by one of his
female employees that, since he is the employer asking your to suffer in this unsafe working environment, you will
hold HIM accountable for any injury, harm or loss as you can not hold the woman accountable for the same.
It is then up to the employer to respond to this Lawful Notice. Should he not respond you issue a follow on letter to
make sure that the employer is noticed of the expiry of the time period in which he can propose solutions and that
he is now lawfully liable under the common law for any injury, harm or loss suffered by you in going about HIS
business.
Make sure he understands that you WILL put him before a jury and demand compensation for ANY injury, harm or
loss caused by false allegations of any of HIS female employees because such could have been easily foreseen.
They happen every day so there is no excuse that this is unusual or unexpected or unknown.
Gentlemen. The way to deal with women is to make sure the MEN who offer them privileges know that it is no
longer acceptable to men to be discriminated against by other men like this and to make sure those MEN who
discriminate against you know that you WILL deprive them of their property should they continue to offer women
privileges over and above equality before the law.
ALL womens privileges are accorded by MEN. Women do almost NOTHING for themselves. So you are best
advised to ATTACK THE MEN who are offering women privileges. Very, very simple.

The Book
42
Public Information
Lawful Notice to:

To the human being calling himself a-b: c also acting as
Mr. A. B. C.
Name and address of employer
Date: xx/xx/20xx
Lawful Notice From:

Peter-Andrew: Nolan
Human Being. All Rights Reserved.
Waiving None. Without Prejudice.
The address that you wish to receive
correspondence to.
Subject: Lawful Notice with respect to Occupational Health and Safety
Notice to Principal and notice to Agent and notice to Agent is notice to Principal.
This lawful notice is issued under the common law jurisdiction of the land commonly called Australia.
To the human being calling himself a-b: c.
Greetings and Salutations. I offer this Lawful Notice to you to ensure we are in agreement as to the obligations of
us both with respect to my being a man who is labouring for you in this company we call xyz.
After much time and study it has come to my attention that I am being placed at severe risk of injury, harm and loss
by working for you in this company. I wish to continue our relationship and so I seek resolution of this issue to the
satisfaction of us both.
As you well know, in our society, including our workplace, women can make false allegations of domestic violence,
sexual harassment, rape, and pretty much anything else they would like to claim is inappropriate or offensive
without enumerating what these might be. They can do this on the basis of lies with complete impunity. It is well
known in our society that women can commit perjury in a court of law under oath and do so with complete impunity.
As a man and as an employee of your company you are asking me to work in interaction with women. However, as
stated above, these woman can make a false allegation against me with impunity causing me serious injury, harm
and loss and I will not be compensated for this crime against me. This is, therefore, an unsafe working
environment. All us men know we are working in such hostile and dangerous environments and it is about time we
did something about it.
I offer you two solutions to this problem for your consideration, both of which would be agreeable and acceptable to
me:
1. Provide me the opportunity to work exclusively with men in the course of performing activities for your
company.
2. Ensure that any woman you request me to work with has created a Bonded Affidavit such that she has
lawfully declared her lawful status. I have no concern what her lawful status is declared to be. I only have
concern that she will be held accountable for any crime she commits against me.
I am sure you agree that you have an obligation as an employer not to allow crimes to be committed with impunity
in your company as part of providing a safe working environment. You would surely agree you have an obligation
to not allow us men to physically hit women or kick them or rape them with impunity. I am just as sure you will
agree that women do not have a right to commit perjury and make false allegations against us men with complete
impunity. All I am insisting on is that I know that those whom I work with can not commit crimes against me with
impunity. A perfectly reasonable position.
In pursuit of ensuring that we can create agreement I am willing to allow you 28 days to determine which of these
options you wish to implement so that we can all work in our newly safe working environment.
I am also open to counter proposals should you believe that you have an alternative solution that might be
acceptable to me.
Should you wish to not respond to this proposal and you insist that I remain working in an un-safe working
environment I hereby lawfully notice you that should I be subject to any such false allegations that I will hold you
responsible as a human being and I will reserve the right to regain all damages from you.

The Book
43
Public Information
I reserve the right to form a de jour jury in a de jour court and present my case against you for what will be your
wilful negligence of my request to ensure that all those employees of yours I interact with be subject to the law of
the land, the common law, just as I am.
It is not my intention to put you into a difficult position. I am merely lawfully noticing you of my position with respect
to currently working in an unsafe working environment. I know this may sound crazy but you and I have both seen
MANY mens careers destroyed by false allegations from women. Should you allow my career to be one of these
then it is you I will hold accountable before a court of law for your wilful negligence.
Yours Sincerely
Peter-Andrew: Nolan
Human Being. All rights reserved.
Without Prejudice.
Also acting as
Primary Creditor and Secured Party
For the Juristic Person
MR. PETER ANDREW NOLAN

The Book
44
Public Information
16.
AFFIDAVIT OF LAWFUL EQUALITY FOR A WOMAN
This section contains the sample text for a woman to declare by way of Affidavit her lawful equality to a man.
Please note this includes waiving the benefits and privileges commonly associated with being a woman. Women
have claimed equality for 40 years now but if you ask a woman to actually write down what she means by that you
will soon see that the picture gets real fuzzy really quickly.
Well? This document is intended to make sure that this fuzziness is removed. This Bonded Affidavit is intended to
be updated and customised by the woman who fills it out to explain EXACTLY what she means by her claim of
equality to a man. Any man has the right to demand any woman produce a copy of this Affidavit at any time, or
that it be kept online to be viewed by any man who wishes to know the lawful status of any woman at any point in
time. If not produced the man has a right to refuse interaction with the woman. I claim this is required because
western women have, en-mass, claimed equality but demanded privilege. Its time that men did not interact with
any woman who was not willing to make a clear statement as to her lawful status.
Lawful Notice To Whom it May Concern

Let All Men and Women Know
Month, Day, Year
<Page Break>
FIAT JUSTITIA, RUAT COELUM

Let Right Be Done, Though The Heavens Should Fall
`
Notice to principal is notice to agent.
Notice to agent is notice to principal.
I, commonly addressed by the calling of First-Second: Family, hereinafter the Principal, in my correct
public capacity as beneficiary to the Original Jurisdiction, being of majority in age, competent to testify, a
self realized and free sentient woman, my yes be yes, my no be no, do state that the truths and facts
herein are of first hand personal knowledge, true, correct, complete, not just true and correct, certain and
not misleading, so help me God.
This Notice is addressed to all the men and women of Gods creation commonly known as Planet Earth.
AFFIDAVIT WITH RESPECT TO EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW

1.
Principal is of legal age and competent to testify.
2.
Principal is of legal age and competent to make oath.
3.
Principal has first hand knowledge of the facts stated herein.
4.
Principal has not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that shows that
Principal does not have lawful right to make the oaths of this affidavit.

The Book
45
Public Information
5.
Principal makes oath that she claims lawful equality with the men of the land known as <name of
the land>.
6.
Principal makes oath that should she stand accused of a crime, that being causing injury harm or
loss to any other human being, by way of a sworn affidavit and accompanying evidence, that she
submits to the authority of a lawfully constituted court with a lawfully constituted jury of 12 men
sworn to judge her case justly and fairly on a lawfully equal basis to any other person presented
to such a jury.
7.
Principal makes oath that she will stand under the decision of the jury on the basis that any such
decision must be unanimous and that any remedy statement rendered by the de jour jury must be
unanimous from the 12 men of the jury.
8.
Principal makes oath that she will stand under the lawful axioms:
All men and women are equal before the law
All men and women are innocent until proven guilty
Burden of proof is with the plaintiff
9.
Principal makes oath that she waives the womens privilege that should she strike a man that
he will not strike her back. Principal stands under the common male principal that to strike a man
is to waive the protection of the law such that the struck man may deal out any punishment he
sees fit.
10.
Principal makes oath that she waives the womens privilege that should she be highly irritating
and obnoxious to a man that the man will not strike her. Principal stands under the common
male principal that to be highly irritating and obnoxious to a man is to waive the protection of the
law such that the man being irritated may deal out any punishment he sees fit.
11.
Principal makes oath that she waives the womens privilege of preferential treatment with
respect to national service and service in the armed forces.
12.
Principal makes oath that she may be called up and conscripted to serve in the armed forces in
the defence of the nation as have men for many years.
13.
Principal makes oath that she waives the womens privilege of preferential treatment with
respect to housing, medical treatment and other government services.
14.
Principal makes oath that she will under no circumstances provide support in any way, shape or
form to any woman who refuses to declare by affidavit her lawful position with respect to equality
to men. Principal is not concerned that a woman might choose equality or chattel property of a
man. Principal is merely concerned that women clearly communicate said choice and Principal
will not support any woman who does not make a declaration by Affidavit one way or the other.

The Book
46
Public Information
15.
Principal makes oath that she will under no circumstances provide support to any endeavour of
any woman who claims lawful equality by similar Affidavit but then takes advantage of mens
habit of extending womens privileges or participates in any activity where men are excluded or
refused the opportunity to earn their living in competition with women based merely on their sex.
Principal states that this includes but is not limited to such items as:
a. Womens Tennis which Principal denounces as sexist and discriminatory.
b. Womens Golf which Principal denounces as sexist and discriminatory.
c. Womens Soccer which Principal denounces as sexist and discriminatory.
d. The teaching professions which Principal denounces as sexist and discriminatory.
e. The child care industry which Principal denounces as sexist and discriminatory.
f. The practice of providing subsidies for Women and other minorities which Principal
denounces as insulting to women and sexist and discriminatory against men.
16.
Principal makes oath that the will under no circumstances accept any government grant or any
government support that she did not compete for on a lawfully equal basis with men.
17.
Principal makes oath that she will under no circumstances request that a man perform a routine
task, like changing a flat tyre on a car, like changing a light bulb, merely to exercise the womens
privilege of being able to get a man to perform a task that she can perfectly well perform herself.
Principal makes oath that she will perform such routine tasks herself or pay the man for his
exertion of his efforts for such routine tasks.
18.
Principal makes oath that in all areas of her life, business or professional, private, or social she
will at all times compete on a lawfully equal basis with men and waive and take no advantage of
womens privileges commonly afforded to women by men.
Principal states that this includes but is not limited to such things as:
a. The womens privilege of being paid for on dates such as dinners, drinks, tickets to
shows, travel, accommodation and similar.
b. Being rated in business or professional performance higher than men based on sex rather
than based on performance. Principal denounces the practice of more highly rating
women based on sex as insulting to her and other women who wish to be treated as
equal before the law to men.
Principal makes oath that she bonds these oaths with the amount of XXXX Troy Ounces of 99.99% pure
gold. This bind amount to be forfeit to any person who can provide evidence to a de jour jury of breaking
these oaths such that the jury decision is that the oaths were broken.
This amount is the declaration of what the Principals word is worth.
Of course, if you have other ideas as to what should go in this affidavit please share on the forums.

The Book
47
Public Information
Further Principal saith not,

As Good As AVAL
_______________________________________________________
First-Second: Family Principal. Only in the capacity as beneficiary of
the Original Jurisdiction.
Done this...................Day of the Ninth Month of the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Ten Anno
Domini, (23rd September AD2010) near Dublin, Ireland.
JURAT:
ss: Sworn and subscribed near the city of Dublin, on this day personally appeared before me FirstSecond: Family known to me to be the living breathing life-force free man described herein who
executed the foregoing instrument acknowledged to me that First-Second: Family executed the same
as his free act and deed as true, correct complete and not misleading.
KNOW all men that I, _______________________ of Dublin, Ireland, at the request of First-Second:
Family , there being no notary public readily available, did on the Twenty Third Day of September 2010
Anno Domini, witness the above autograph of First-Second: Family before
_____________________________________ and
_____________________________________.
Yours Faithfully,
By,
(Autographed)
Witness 1 ...
Date: .
Witness 2

The Book
48
Public Information
17.
AFFIDAVIT OF CHATTEL PROPERTY FOR A WOMAN TO A MAN
This section contains the sample text for a woman to declare by way of Affidavit that she wishes to be the chattel
property of a man. Typically this will be her father, husband or son. By declaring herself the property of a man the
woman is declaring that she wishes the provision and protection of the man and other men and wishes to avail of
the typical and traditional womens privileges extended by men to women.
Of course in this arrangement the man will perform the traditional roles of provider/protector for the woman. The
reason there is no affidavit needed is that his word will be good enough to trust.
The idea is to make it very clear that the woman knows and understands that she is choosing to submit to the man
and that she is seeking the provision and protection of the man in return. She is also making clear that the man is
the head of the family and that any children ensuing from the relationship with the man are the property of the
man. In short. This is very much like the traditional version of marriage.

Month, Day, Year
<Page Break>

`
I, commonly addressed by the calling of First-Second: Family, hereinafter the Principal, in my correct
public capacity as beneficiary to the Original Jurisdiction, being of majority in age, competent to testify, a
self realized and free sentient woman, my yes be yes, my no be no, do state that the truths and facts
herein are of first hand personal knowledge, true, correct, complete, not just true and correct, certain and
not misleading, so help me God.
This Notice is addressed to all the men and women of Gods creation commonly known as Planet Earth.
AFFIDAVIT WITH RESPECT TO A WOMAN DECLARING

HERSELF THE CHATTEL PROPERTY OF A MAN
1.
2.
Principal is of legal age and competent to make oath and waive rights.
3.

The Book
49
Public Information
4.
Principal has not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that shows that
Principal does not have lawful right to make the oaths and waive the rights noted in this
affidavit.
5.
Principal makes oath that she claims to be the lawful chattel property of the man commonly
called first-second: last who was born on the land known as <name of the land>.
6.
Principal makes oath that she waives all rights and vests all her God given rights to the man
commonly called first-second: last.
7.
Principal makes oath that in any dispute of opinion in any decision making process she will
submit to the decision arrived at by the man commonly called first-second: last and put her
faith and trust in him that he will act in her best interests.
8.
Principal makes oath that any children that may ensue from the union with the man commonly
called first-second that she waives all parental and ownership rights to the child to the man
commonly called first-second: last. Principal makes oath that in any dispute of opinion in any
decision making process with respect to raising any children that may ensure she will submit
to the decision arrived at by the man commonly called first-second: last and put her faith and
trust in him that he will act in the best interests of the children
9.
Principal makes claim to the right to avail of traditional chivalry offered by men to the wives of
their fellow men.
10.
Principal makes claim she is desirous of the provision and protection of the men of her land
such that they will make their best efforts to protect her at all times.
11.
Principal makes claim that she believes women are, on average, significantly smaller and
weaker than men and is desirous of claiming an obligation upon men to assist her when in
need on the basis of her weaker and smaller physical build.
Principal makes oath that she bonds these oaths with the amount of XXXX Troy Ounces of 99.99% pure
gold. This amount to be forfeit to any person who can provide evidence to a de jour jury of breaking
these oaths such that the jury decision is that the oaths were broken.
This amount is the declaration of what the Principals word is worth.

The Book
50
Public Information

As Good As AVAL
_______________________________________________________
First-Second: Family Principal. Only in the capacity as beneficiary of
the Original Jurisdiction.
Done this...................Day of the Ninth Month of the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Ten Anno
Domini, (23rd September AD2010) near Dublin, Ireland.
JURAT:
ss: Sworn and subscribed near the city of Dublin, on this day personally appeared before me FirstSecond: Family known to me to be the living breathing life-force free man described herein who
executed the foregoing instrument acknowledged to me that First-Second: Family executed the same
as his free act and deed as true, correct complete and not misleading.
KNOW all men that I, _______________________ of Dublin, Ireland, at the request of First-Second:
Family , there being no notary public readily available, did on the Twenty Third Day of September 2010
Anno Domini, witness the above autograph of First-Second: Family before
_____________________________________ and
_____________________________________.
Yours Faithfully,
By,
(Autographed)
Witness 1 ...
Date: .
Witness 2

The Book
51
Public Information
18.
AGREEMENT OF MARRIAGE BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN
All around the world the guvment offers its good help by offering a marriage contract. However, that contract is
not actually given to the people involved, especially the man. He is kept completely in the dark. Further, the
guvment actually changes that contract over time. The marriage contract is fraudulent and one can rescind ones
consent to it from the beginning because of the fraud.
This section contains the sample text for a man and a woman to write an Agreement that is a binding contract for
the duration of the marriage. This is a template and it is intended that the man and the woman will update it to suit
their own beliefs and opinions. There is sample text for a variety of options included into the contract.
The Agreement must be entered into freely without coercion and remains in force for the period of the Agreement.
The parties may place an Agreement period or may use until death do us part clause. It is up to them.
The point of the Agreement is that it is an Agreement between the man and the woman and NOT the guvment.
Now. The woman may have created an Affidavit for lawful equality to men or chattel property to a man and either
Affidavit might be reflected in the marriage contract. No matter what form of Affidavit the woman has completed the
template Marriage Agreement can be updated to reflect the claims the woman has made.
The purpose of the Marriage Agreement is for YOU, the man, to have clarity as to the Agreement you are entering
into and to remove the womens privilege of not being responsible for the Agreements she makes.
Of course, if you are already married you can rescind your existing Marriage License and re-write your marriage
using the template Marriage Agreement as the basis for customisation.
I would strongly encourage ALL MEN to rescind their fraudulent marriage licenses and create a Marriage
Agreement such that you have clarity and a lawful basis on which to built your marriage.
It does not matter if your wife refuses to rescind your fraudulent marriage license. You can do that unilaterally and I
have provided the Affidavit for that.
Once you have gone through the process of rebutting your marriage license via affidavit and then issuing your
default judgment you are no longer married in the eyes of your guvment. Any man who does not get himself out
of the hell known as the Marriage License to the guvment when it is so easy to do now is an idiot who deserves
everything coming his way from a vindictive soon to be ex-wife.
ALL MEN who read this are asked to get out there and tell ALL MARRIED MEN how to rescind their fraudulent
Marriage License and to divorce the guvment.
If your wife complains about you rescinding your consent to be married and you really want to be married to her
then she can complete a Marriage Agreement with you.
ALL MEN should be well aware that this means that those of you who are doing cheaper to keep her can now get
rid of any wife you dont like at a FAR BETTER price than has been possible in the past. Women have been
responsible for 90%+ of divorces over the last 30-40 years when offered babies and money by the guvment?
Well? They have nothing to complain about if men seek a little equality in that 90% number and divorce those
women whom they have found to be unsatisfactory wives.
And my personal message to all those manginas like Barrack Obama who so continually talk about dead beat
dads and so continually run men down?
FUCK YOU MANGINA. YOU GET NO RESPECT FROM ME.
I would encourage ALL MEN to tell those manginas who so consistently talk about dead beat dads exactly the
same. Barrack Obama is one of the most disgusting pieces of shit walking this planet today given his incessant
unjust vilification of men.
I do not respect ANY MAN who votes for uber-mangina Obama.

The Book
52
Public Information
MARRIAGE AGREEMENT
ABC-20100101-MA
Non-negotiable Private between the Parties
PARTIES
MAN
First-second: last(c)
WOMAN
First-second: last(c)
This Marriage Agreement is mutually agreed upon and entered into in this Nineteenth Day of the Tenth Month in
the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Nine between the Man first-second: last(c) and the Woman first-second:
last(c).
Words Defined; Glossary of Terms. As used in this Marriage Agreement, the following words and terms express
the meanings set forth as follows, non obstante:
Appellation. In this Marriage Agreement the term appellation means: A general term that introduces and
specifies a particular term which may be used in addressing, greeting, calling out for, and making appeals
of a particular living, breathing, flesh-and-blood man or woman.
Derivative. In this Marriage Agreement the term derivative means coming from another; taken from
something preceding; secondary; that which has not the origin in itself, but obtains existence from
something foregoing and of a more primal and fundamental nature; anything derived from another.
Ens legis. In this Marriage Agreement the term ens legis means a creature of the law; an artificial being,
as contrasted with a natural person, such as a corporation, considered as deriving its existence entirely
from the law.
Marriage Agreement. In this Marriage Agreement the term Marriage Agreement means this Marriage
Agreement ABC-20100101-MA, as this Marriage Agreement may be amended and modified in accordance
with the agreement of the parties signing hereunder, together with all attachments, exhibits, documents,
endorsements, and schedules re this Marriage Agreement attached hereto.
Arbitration Panel. In this Marriage Agreement the term Arbitration Panel means a panel of 12 living
souls of 6 men and 6 women who have been in a state of marriage for 20 years of longer and have one
child of 18 years of age or older. This Arbitration Panel is to hear disputes and to take into consideration
the best interests of the children, the community, and the disputing couple to issue Remedy Instruction to
resolve the dispute. The Arbitration Panel does NOT have the full powers of a properly convened court de
jour and does not follow all the guidelines of a de jour court.
De Jour Court and De Jour Jury. In this Marriage Agreement the terms De Jour Court and De Jour
Jury means a panel of 12 living souls of men empanelled under oath to hear a criminal case of injury,
harm or loss by a plaintiff against a defendant. All decisions of the de jour jury must be unanimous. All
Remedy Instructions issued by the de jour Jury must be unanimous. In this Marriage Agreement the de jour
Jury can be invoked by either party when there is an unresolved complaint of criminal behaviour such as
physical violence by one party against another. A de jour jury in a de jour court is the highest authority in
the land and can issue Remedy Instructions that must be obeyed by any Government Instrument.
first-second: family. In this Marriage Agreement the term first-second : family means the sentient, living,
breathing, flesh-and-blood man identified by the distinctive appellation First-second: family.
first-second: family. In this Marriage Agreement the term first-second : family means the sentient, living,
breathing, flesh-and-blood woman identified by the distinctive appellation First-second: family.
Juristic person. In this Marriage Agreement the term juristic person means an abstract, legal entity ens
legis, such as a corporation, created by construct of law and considered as possessing certain legal rights
and duties of a human being; an imaginary entity, such as Debtor, i.e. FIRST SECOND FAMILY, which, on
the basis of legal reasoning, is legally treated as a human being for the purpose of conducting commercial
activity for the benefit of a biological, living being, such as Creditor.
The Book
53
Public Information
Man or Living, breathing, flesh-and-blood man. In this Marriage Agreement the term living, breathing,
flesh-and-blood man means the man, first-second: last, a sentient, living being, as distinguished from an
artificial construct, ens legis, i.e. a juristic person, created by construct of law.
Woman or Living, breathing, flesh-and-blood woman. In this Marriage Agreement the term living,
breathing, flesh-and-blood man means the woman, first-second: last, a sentient, living being, as
distinguished from an artificial construct, ens legis, i.e. a juristic person, created by construct of law.
Non obstante. In this Marriage Agreement the term non obstante means: Words anciently used in public
and private instruments with the intent of precluding, in advance, any interpretation other than certain
declared objects, purposes
Sentient, living being. In this Marriage Agreement the term sentient, living being means the man or
woman, i.e. first-second: last or first-second: last, a living, breathing, flesh-and-blood man, as
distinguished from an abstract legal construct such as an artificial entity, juristic person, corporation,
partnership, association, and the like.
This Marriage Agreement ABC-20100101-MA is dated: the Nineteenth Day of the Tenth Month in the Year
of Our Lord Two Thousand and Nine.

The Book
54
Public Information
Terms of Performance for the Man

(In this section the man is required to document what his obligations and expectations for his performance are.)
1. The man will make his best efforts to provide food, shelter, clothing, warmth and comfort for the woman and
any children born of the woman.
2. The man will make his best efforts to provide education for any children born of the woman such that the
children have the best opportunity the man can possibly provide for the children.
3. Should the woman fall ill the man will make his best efforts to provide for her well-being.
4. The man undertakes that he has no unilateral right of action within the household. All actions required two
yeses and both parties have veto over any decision. The only exception is the disciplining of any children born
of the woman that may be necessary. The man has unilateral decision making power over the disciplining of
the children.
Terms of Performance for the Woman

1. The woman will make her best efforts to provide food, shelter, clothing, warmth and comfort for the man in the
period before any children she may be lucky enough to bear.
2. Should the woman bear children she will make her best efforts to provide care and nurturing for the best
outcome for the children.
3. Should the woman bear children she reserves the right to return to work and place the children into care. The
care arrangement must be agreed by the man. The woman has no unilateral decision making rights towards
the mans children. Both parties must be in agreement with all decisions relating to the welfare of the children.
4. Should the man fall ill the woman will make her best efforts to provide for his well-being.
5. The man and the woman may wish to negotiate the question of sex and intimacy in this section. For example
the man is taking on the obligation to make his best efforts to provide food, shelter, clothing etc. The wise man
who wishes to make sure his wife will give him the sex he needs will write what he wants in this section of the
Agreement. If nothing is written, then he is pretty much accepting that no sex will happen.
6. The woman undertakes that she has no unilateral right of action within the household. All actions required two
yeses and both parties have veto over any decision. The only exception is the disciplining of any children born
of the woman that may be necessary. The man has unilateral decision making power over the disciplining of
the children.

The Book
55
Public Information
Property Rights
1. On the birth of a child by the woman the man has the right to perform a paternity test to ensure that the baby is
his biological baby.
2. All property rights are vested in the man and he can delegate signing rights to various instruments to the
woman.
3. The man and the woman are vested with property rights and each retains their own property. A set of joint
property is to be created and this join property will be accessible to both the man and the woman over their
signatures independently. This may include such joint property as bank accounts, motor vehicles, household
furniture and the like.
4. None of the property of the man or woman is to be transferred to any guvment department via registration.
This include the house, motor vehicles, children or any other property that is commonly registered in the
ignorance that registration is required.
Force Majeure
1. Neither party can be held responsible for contract violation due to incidents that are outside of their reasonable
or possible control. This includes such things as Acts of God, victims of criminal actions, genuine illness and
similar difficult circumstances that neither party can control.
Remedy Procedure
Should the two parties have a dispute which can not be resolved then the remedy procedure for Agreement
continuance is as follows:
1. Each party prepare Affidavits and swap them with each other.
2. Each party prepare responding Affidavits until such time as all responses are exhausted.
3. The parties empanel an Arbitration Panel.
4. The parties present their affidavits to the Arbitration Panel.
5. The Arbitration Panel reads the affidavits and can ask questions of the Parties which are answered under oath.
6. Any incidence of Perjury results in the Marriage Agreement being immediately terminated and all property and
children being placed with the injured party. The injured party then has all right to determine how to proceed.
7. The Arbitration Panel will retire to privately discuss the Remedy Instruction that they will issue.
8. The Arbitration Panel issues the Remedy Instruction and both parties are obliged to make best efforts to
implement the Remedy Instruction.
9. Should either party refuse to perform their allotted Remedy Instruction all joint Property and any children are
transferred to the Injured Party and the Agreement is terminated.
10. The Arbitration Panel may order a portion of the property owned by the refusing party to also be transferred to
the Injured Party.
Under NO circumstances can the Arbitration Panel issue any order for future income of the man or woman to be
transferred to the other party. Should the Agreement be terminated there can be no future obligations placed upon
either party as there is no Agreement by which to place those obligations. If the woman wants the benefit of the
children she can pay for them. If the man wants the benefit of the children he can pay for them. Period.
The Book
56
Public Information
Penalty Clauses
The following penalty clauses apply to this contract:
1. Sexual intercourse with a third party without the expressed written notarised consent of the other party is
strictly forbidden. Any such sexual intercourse proven will result in the termination of the Agreement. Children
born of the woman will be transferred to the injured party. All joint property and all property of the injuring party
will be transferred to the injured party. The Agreement will then terminate.
2. Sexual intercourse with a third party is agreed to under the terms of this Agreement.
3. Physical assault of one party by another party is subject to common law on the basis of causing injury harm or
loss. The injured party can make claim and make request for remedy. Should the injuring party not perform the
proposed remedy the injured party can being the matter to a de jour court with a jury of 12 men and present the
case. Both parties agree to be bound by the decision of the de jour jury.
4. Physical assault of one party to a child of the marriage is strictly forbidden. This does NOT include the normal
disciplining of children that is required. The man will be the sole arbiter as to the use of force on a child for the
purpose of disciplining the child.
Should the woman physically assault the child the man can complete an Affidavit and propose remedy. Should
the woman not perform the Proposed Remedy then the man can bring the Affidavits and evidence to a de jour
court and a de jour jury of 12 men can hear the case and issue a Remedy Instruction.
The woman undertakes to make best efforts to perform the Remedy Instruction. Should the woman refuse to
make remedy the de jour jury will issue instruction to transfer the children to the man, all property to the man,
and terminate the Agreement.
5. The man and woman may also write in other penalty clauses such as:
a. Should either party make demeaning or insulting remarks to any third party with obvious intent to
cause emotional distress to the other party then a penalty of xxxxxxxxx will be applied.
b. Should either party lie be word or lie by omission of word to the other party then a penalty of xxxxxxx
will be applied.
Under no circumstances may either party employ the services of any government agency nor the services of any
Family Law Lawyer to bring dispute to the Marriage Agreement.
Should a party sign any contract with any government re-presentative or family law lawyer then the all property and
the children will be forfeit to the injured party immediately and the Agreement will terminate immediately.
This is put in here to put those scumbag family law lawyers and judges out of business.
They should be flipping burgers.

The Book
57
Public Information
Contract Termination
Should the woman bear a child that is not the child of the man then:
1.
This Agreement is automatically terminated.
2.
The child becomes the lawful property of the man who is the biological father.
3.
All property of the woman is forfeit to the man.
4.
The man shall decide how he chooses to move forward and is not bound by any clauses in this
contract.
This contract is set to run from the date of 2010-01-01 until the date of 2020-12-31.
At the end of this contact property will be split as follows:
1. All personal property of the man and woman will remain with the man and the woman.
2. All joint property will be split as nearly as 50/50 as is possible.
3. Any dispute will be taken to an Arbitration Panel.
With respect to children the following applies:
1. Should any minor children remain in the household they will be transferred to the man and he shall be
solely responsible for their upbringing to the age of 18.
2. Should any minor children remain in the household they will go with the same sex parent and that parent
shall be solely responsible for their upbringing.
3. Should any minor children remain in the household they will be transferred to the woman and she shall be
solely responsible for their upbringing to the age of 18.
With respect to any monies earned after the agreement termination both parties are in agreement that no claim can
be made on future incomes as the agreement is no longer in force and can not be used to make claims on future
monies.

The Book
58
Public Information
Man
Woman
Autograph
Autograph
Printed Calling
Printed Calling
Date
Date
KNOW all men that I, _______________________ of London, England, at the request of first-second: last and
first-second: last did on the Nineteenth Day of October 2009 Anno Domini, witness the above autograph firstsecond: last and first-second: last before
_____________________________________ and
_____________________________________.
Yours Faithfully,
By,
(Autographed)
Witness 1 ...
Date: .
Witness 2

The Book
59
Public Information
19.
THE ARBITRATION PANEL
I have proposed an Arbitration Panel for the resolution of dispute or divorce between a man and a woman where
they have created that marriage using the Marriage Agreement.
There are MANY reasons why I propose this. Not the least of which is that the Family Courts are a satanic
criminal enterprise used to enslave men. However, there are occasions when a divorce is something that would
actually be beneficial to the parties involved. There are actually men who are terrible fathers and husbands, and
there are actually women who are terrible wives and mothers. No man, or woman, should be forced to be shackled
to one of these if there is clear evidence that severe violence and threat of severe injury exists. The normal rough
and tumble of relationships is not an excuse for a divorce, in my opinion. And this ludicrous I dont like the one I
picked nonsense has to stop because it injures the children so badly.
In my opinion, the one who breaks the Marriage Agreement must be required to make Remedy according to the
unanimous decision of the Arbitration Panel. There can be no consequence free breech of Agreement allowed. If
there is? Then Agreement are worthless.
The proposal for the Arbitration Panel is as follows:
1. To contain 6 men and 6 women.
2. These men and women must have been married for 20+ years. Not necessarily to each other but if some
married couples were on the panel I would say this is a good thing.
3. Each person on the panel must have raised at least one child to the age of 18 years.
4. Decisions from the Arbitration Panel must be unanimous. This includes verdicts of innocence or guilt of
breech of Agreement as well as Remedy Instructions for the people involved.
5. All Remedy Instructions are to be sex neutral. This means that Arbitration Panels must take into account
the prior Remedy Instructions of other Arbitration Panels in issuing a Remedy Instruction. Such prior cases
might be referenced by a person who is nominated as an expert advisor to the Arbitration Panel.
By using prior decisions for Remedy Instructions on a sex neutral basis the tendency for women to be
given pussy passes will be removed because the same pass will be required to be given to men in the
same situation. The Arbitration Panel will not have the ability to discriminate against men as the satanic
criminal Family Courts do today.
6. All evidence given to the Arbitration Panel is given into the Public under oath and can be reviewed by any
person over the age of 18 at a later date.
7. Deliberations of the Arbitration Panel will be video and audio recorded so that any attempt to subvert the
process of dispute settlement can be detected at a later date. Since serving on the Arbitration Panel is
performed under oath any attempt to subvert it is the crime of perjury and the Panelist is subject to the
common law punishment for Perjury should he/she be found guilty of this crime.
8. The only way that the Arbitration Panel can vary from this proposal is if both parties sign an Affidavit
agreeing to the alterations from the standard Arbitration Panel.
9. The person found to be in the wrong pays for the costs of the Arbitration Panel.
10. Should the Arbitration Panel be invoked on an amicable agreement basis to issue Instructions for the
termination of the Marriage Agreement then payment for the panellists is to be made from the joint assets
of the man and woman prior to any disbursement of assets from the couple.
11. The recommended payment for the Panelists is one ounce of silver per hour of service. Should any
panellist attempt to pad the deliberations for personal benefit they can be accused of the crime of theft.

The Book
60
Public Information
12. The recommended payment for the expert advisor to the panel is two ounces of silver per hour. This is
because he will have to read through many transcripts to determine the outcomes of OTHER cases and he
will not be paid for this time of reading transcripts for OTHER cases. He must make his money up for this
time by being paid at a higher rate when exercising his knowledge of other cases gained in his own time.
Should you have other suggestions for the Arbitration Panel please feel free to post them to the forums.
It is my belief that such an Arbitration Panel will be a far more effective instrument to end Marriages that are in
severe trouble than the current satanic criminal family courts.

The Book
61
Public Information
20.
RESCIND YOUR PRESUMED CONSENT TO THE MARRIAGE

CONTRACT
One of the most important things in this document is the following affidavit that you can then follow up with a default
judgement. If you are ALREADY MARRIED then you, sir, are WELL ADVISED to rescind the implied consent that
you have agreed to the Marriage Contract that people talk about.
In ALL THE FORMER BRITISH EMPIRE LANDS the marriage contract is a fraudulent contract. There are four
key elements of a contract for that contract to be lawful.
1.
Full Disclosure Meaning that both parties must be fully open in setting and agreeing upon the details
and the terms of the contract. Both parties must be left with no doubt or confusion about the terms set
out in the contract.
2.
Consideration Meaning that which is offered in the agreement. The Consideration must be
something that all parties to the contract agree is of enough value to involve their participation in the
contract. .
3.
Terms and Conditions Meaning the structure and the requirements of the agreement and the
obligations of each or all of the involved parties.
4.
Signature This is the most important part of the Contract and is the proof that the agreement took
place. It also implies consensus ad idem or a meeting of the minds.
If the contract is not lawful then it can be rescinded. This comes from the fundamental position in common law of
to not use fraud in your contracts. The re-presentatives of THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRLIA make the
presumption that when signing the Certificate of Marriage that you are entering into a three way binding contract
with THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRLIA. They are claiming the following:
1. That they are the superior party to a three party contract.
2. That they own ALL PROCEEDS of the marriage including ALL PROPERTY, ALL CHILDREN and any
other assets that are brought to the marriage from prior efforts as well!!
So? Here is a question for you if you are a married man? Where you ever presented with a contract, namely a set
of pieces of paper, that provided:
1. FULL DISCLOSURE
2. MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL CONSIDERATION
3. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
For your marriage?
And did you ever discuss this contract with a re-presentative of THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRLIA such that
you had a meeting of the minds and did this re-presentative of THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRLIA sign this
contract in your presence such that it was clear to all parties as to the nature of this contract?
And if you, Sir, did NOT have this? You are the victim of a fraudulent contract and you can rescind that contract
from the beginning. You can complete your Affidavit, Proposed Remedy and Notice of Intent should you wish to,
and should the re-presentatives of THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRLIA not be able to show you the contracts
signed under the conditions above you can create a default judgment and send it back off to Gillard and Krew
saying that you are no longer legally married and NEVER WERE LEGALLY MARRIED because the presumed
contract was NEVER VALID as the presumptions were based on a fraud.
Yes Sir. If you want? You can divorce THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRLIA and your WIFE and she has no
recourse to the FAMILY LAW or to the FAMILY COURTS the minute you issue the default judgment.
Update: 2011-03-24. I have now served on Julia Gillard my Default Judgement for my rescinding my presumed
consent to the marriage contract from the beginning. No rebuttal was forthcoming.

The Book
62
Public Information
How do you go about divorcing THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRLIA and your wife?
Simple.
Take the following Affidavit and customise it to your own needs. Send it off to the usual list of suspects depending
on the country in which you live. In Australia that would be the Prime Minister, Governor General, Attorney General
and the Queen, just to be nice to Lizzy to let her know one more of her slaves has run off the plantation.
Then, given an appropriate time period like 2-3 weeks, if the re-presentatives of THE COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRLIA have not produced the correct paperwork, and they wont, you issue a default judgment to rescind any
implied consent to be married.
This procedure works whether you perform a Strawman Recapture or not. This affidavit is performed at the
common law level. You were tricked into believing you had a contract with THE COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRLIA when you did not. And fraud can never be the basis for a lawful contract. When fraud is used to make
presumption of a lawful contract that contract is NEVER in force. It is null and void from the beginning (ab initio).
What does this mean? This means I have just put into the public the lawful mechanism for ANY MAN IN
AUSTRALIA, or indeed the former British Colonies, to divorce their wives and NOT be subject to Family Law! How
about that? Any man who wishes to send me a donation via paypal would be most appreciated!!! The donation
button is on the front page of my website!
Quite seriously. ANY MAN who does not IMMEDIATELY rescind his consent to be married to THE
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRLIA and is subsequently taken to the cleaners by wifey? I will no longer have any
sympathy for such men. Really. I cant do ANY MORE than give them the paperwork to complete.
Now. Women are going to bitch and moan that I have done this. GOOD! They are going to say:
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) is a scumbag because he promotes divorce?
Western women are hypocrites. They have been promoting divorce for decades and they have been vicious and
ruthless about it as well. They can say whatever they like about me. The women who have been good and loving
wives to their husbands have nothing to fear. The husband can rescind his consent to be married to THE
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRLIA unilaterally and he can sign up a Marriage Agreement with the wife he is
happy with.
The only women who have anything to fear from this paperwork are women who have been complete bitches to
their husbands whom the husband would be very happy to be without. THOSE women SHOULD be worried. Any
man who divorces one of THOSE women? GOOD LUCK TO HIM!
I worked for over 18 months to enrol women into the possibility of discussing the vast bias in the courts, the pussy
pass for perjury and the deaths of so many men. Western women REFUSED TO DISCUSS THIS ISSUE.
th
When I walked into the Australian Federal Magistrates Court on November 26 2009 and proved my remedy? That
was the last day that women could have offered a peace offering to go forward. Women hated on me for 18
months while I created my remedy? Well? Now they only have themselves to blame that I am making that remedy
available to ALL MEN in the former British empire. All common law lands.
This document will work in such places as:
Australia
Ireland
USA
Canada
New Zealand
INDIA (I LOVE THAT!!)
And all the other Commonwealth countries.

The Book
63
Public Information
20.1. What about current assets?

I would suggest that ALL MEN of any significant means get a bank account in a THIRD PARTY JURISDICTION
AS SOON AS YOU CAN.
Just because you have contracts in place does NOT mean that the PTB will not try and steal from you. You are
well advised to get your money out of THEIR system as soon as you can because THEIR system is on the downhill
run. You can put your money into a foreign jurisdiction or you can turn it into silver (I think gold has been cornered
by the Illuminati) or some other form of persistent wealth.
I propose that I will run a service to get bank accounts created in Switzerland because I have dealings quite close
to Switzerland. The going rate for foreigners opening up a bank account in Switzerland via an agency is EUR700
or so for the agency. This is quite a fair fee for the legwork involved. I could make a very good business of that.
There is no law saying that you can not open a bank account in Switzerland or any other third party jurisdiction if
you want to. Certainly the Swiss will be happy to have your money.
I also know men in Australia who are working on creating a bank that they will run. When it is off the ground that will
be another option. Once it is off the ground I will announce the details on my web site.
If you have a house and a mortgage? I would recommend you learn how to clear your mortgage so that you owe
the bank no money. Once you do that? Sell your house immediately and turn the asset into something that the
Illuminati can not steal from you. The Illuminati has a plan to seize all houses even if you have claimed it back
through your strawman. This plan includes guns, lots of guns.
If you have NOT somehow reclaimed your house back from your strawman the guvment still owns it and you are a
tenant in your own house. This is how they make you pay land taxes lawfully and legally.
Sir? If your wife gives you ANY STATIC about clearing out your mortgage and selling the house so that you can
put YOUR ASSETS out of the reach of the CRIMINALS in the guvment? ANY STATIC AT ALL? You KNOW what
that means. You dont need me to tell you.
Women bring 90%+ of ALL divorces (those numbers provided by women by the way) and the women have been
making out like bandits in divorces for decades. The women know this. Hell, so do most men. So all those
INTELLIGENT MEN OUT THERE? You are going to use this paperwork and then move on. You might stay
married or you might leave. But whatever it is you do? You will have YOUR ASSETS beyond the reach of YOUR
WIFE and the CRIMINALS in the guvment.
And that is a REAL smart idea.
Just remember men. I was stripped of 95% of the assets I created over a 25 year period. Once you take into
account legal fees I was out about EUR40,000 for 25 years of work. Women LAUGHED at me. So I say no man
should have ANY SYMPATHY for the womens loss of ability to screw you over via the courts. The women have
done this RUTHLESSLY for decades now. Men have pleaded with the women FOR DECADES to stop doing this.
And they refused to. Well? All I am doing is setting the playing field level.
I am not suggesting men rip women off. I am suggesting that women have THEIR ability to rip men off removed.
Experience in the US has shown that if the woman does NOT massively financially benefit from divorce that the
divorce rate drops like a stone.
Those US states where divorce laws were very biased and they were changed BACK to 50/50 custody is standard
unless PROOF of wrong doing and no alimony because of the 50/50 custody? Those states saw divorce rates
drop like a stone. Well? We are likely to see the same in the west. Once women are no longer able to screw a man
over in the courts? I believe we are going to see women return to be a whole lot nicer people rather than the
complete bitches so many western women have been these last 40 years. Try reading www.the-spearhead.com to
read about how horrible women have been to men of late.
Gentlemen?
1. Divorce your state. Why would you want to be married to your guvment?
2. Get your money out of the country before your country gets your money out of you.
3. THEN decide if you still want to be married. Be a free man who is married, not a slave. Or leave. Up to you!

The Book
64
Public Information
From the free man commonly called

Peter-Andrew: Nolan,
Standing in Gods Kingdom
In Care Of xxxxxxxxxxxx
To:
Lawful Notice To Respondent:
The human being calling herself Julia Gillard also claiming to act as Prime Minister of the Company
commonly known as THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
PO Box 6022
House of Re-Presentatives
Parliament House
Canberra ACT 2600
Phone: + 61-2-6277-7700
Fax: +61-2-6273-4100
st
1 November 2010

The Book
65
Public Information
Lawful Notice To Respondent:

The human being calling herself Julia Gillard also claiming to act as Prime Minister of the Company commonly
known as THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
PO Box 6022
House of Re-presentatives
Parliament House
Canberra ACT 2600
st
1 November 2010

`
I, commonly addressed by the calling of Peter-Andrew: Nolan, hereinafter the Principal, in my correct public
capacity as beneficiary to the Original Jurisdiction, being of majority in age, competent to testify, a self realized and
free sentient man, my yes be yes, my no be no, do state that the truths and facts herein are of first hand personal
knowledge, true, correct, complete, not just true and correct, certain and not misleading, so help me God.
This Notice is addressed to the the human being calling herself Julia Gillard also claiming to act as Prime Minister
of the Company commonly known as THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA.
AFFIDAVIT WITH RESPECT TO

RESCINDING CONSENT TO A MARRIAGE LICENSE
AND IMPLIED CONTRACTS
BETWEEN
JENNIFER MARGUERITE ROBINSON
AND
PETER ANDREW NOLAN
1.
2.
3.
Principal makes oath that on the date of 7th of October 1989 he and Jennifer Marguerite Robinson
undertook the ceremony of Marriage in St Pauls Church, Fernleigh Road, Turvey Park Wagga
Wagga, New South Wales on a land commonly known as Australia.
4.
Principal makes oath that he applied his signature to a document called Certificate of Marriage which
is headed as Commonwealth of Australia Marriage Act Registered Number 35078.
5.
Principal makes oath that the celebrant that did countersign this Certificate of Marriage was a man
that presented himself as a Minister of the Anglican Church by the name of John Cohen. A man
known to myself and my bride for some time to be re-presenting himself as a Minister of the Anglican
Church.

The Book
66
Public Information
6.
Principal makes oath that the extract of the Certificate of Marriage shows that it was registered at
th
Sydney, NEW SOUTH WALES on 20 of December 1989 and signed by a said Principal Registrar
the name of whom is not discernable from the signature.
7.
Principal makes oath that he was not present at the signing of the Certificate of Marriage by said
th
Principal Registrar on 20 December 1989 and at no time did said Principal Registrar contact
Principal and discuss or disclose any claimed conditions of any implied contract associated with this
Certificate of Marriage.
8.
Principal makes oath that at the date of signing this Certificate of Marriage no evidence was
presented to Principal as to what the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRLIA actually was.
9.
Principal makes oath that only after extensive reading and research did he find in 2008 that the
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA is a sovereign entity registered on the UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and is merely a privately held run for profit corporation
and not, as represented, a Constitutional Monarchy run by a government working in the best interests
of the people who inhabit the land mass commonly known as AUSTRALIA. Further. This corporation
was only registered on the UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION in 1999
after the referendum on Australia becoming a republic which was a fraudulent referendum to my
knowledge.
10.
Principal makes oath that he has never, at any time, been presented with any evidence of the lawful
and legal existence of an entity known as THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA at the time he
signed the Certificate of Marriage.
11.
Principal makes oath that to his certain knowledge the alleged terms and conditions of the Marriage
th
Act 1961 were varied since 7 of October 1989. This has been done by successive Acts of
Parliament by which the Marriage Act and Family Law Act have been vastly altered in the period
between 7th of October 1989 to 11th November 2007.
12.
Principal makes oath that he has seen no facts or material evidence to the effect that:
For a contract to be binding it does NOT require all of the following and sincerely believes none exists:
i. Full Disclosure Meaning that both parties must be fully open in setting and agreeing
upon the details and the terms of the contract. Both parties must be left with no doubt or
confusion about the terms set out in the contract.
ii. Consideration Meaning that which is offered in the agreement. The Consideration
must be something that all parties to the contract agree is of enough value to involve their
participation in the contract. .
iii. Terms and Conditions Meaning the structure and the requirements of the agreement and
the obligations of each or all of the involved parties.
iv. Signature This is the most important part of the Contract and is the proof that the
agreement took place. It also implies consensus ad idem or a meeting of the minds.
13.
Principal makes oath that he has seen no facts or material evidence to the effect that:
Once a contract is executed by the signing of the involved parties that the contract can be altered
without such documents as a contract amendment or contract variation that must also be in writing and
must also meet the 4 conditions listed above for the contract amendment to be binding and sincerely
believes none exists
14.
Principal makes oath that the Terms and Conditions to the Certificate of Marriage that the entity
calling itself THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA re-presented by the non-present party calling
himself Principal Registrar at no time attached or presented the Terms and Conditions claimed to be
the Marriage Act of 1961 to the Certificate of Marriage.

The Book
67
Public Information
15.
Principal makes oath that he never had full disclosure of the alleged contract as he was led to believe
that the Marriage Certificate was a formality and did was not in any way, shape or form create a
contract with the legal entity calling itself THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA.
16.
Principal makes oath that at no time did the man calling himself John Cohen and presenting himself as
a minister of the Anglican Church say that he was also acting as an agent of the entity calling itself
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and therefore Principal makes Oath that it was at no time
disclosed that the there would be a presumption that signing the Certificate of Marriage would create
any sort of binding contract with the entity calling itself THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA.
17.
Principal makes oath that at no time did any self declared re-presentative of the entity calling itself
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA make offer of consideration in exchange for signing an
alleged contract.
18.
Principal makes oath that at no time did any self declared re-presentative of the entity calling itself
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA make presentation that the Certificate of Marriage was a
three way binding contract with THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA being the superior party
and claiming ownership and title of all property and offspring of the Principal and his bride Jennifer
Marguerite Toal.
Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, the free man on the land
commonly called Peter-Andrew: Nolan standing in Gods Kingdom do hereby say clearly, specifically and
unequivocally that I rescind any presumed consent to enter into any contract with the entity known as THE
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA via the signature of the Trademark named PETER ANDREW NOLAN via the
document commonly called a Certificate of Marriage.
Furthermore, I claim that all actions deriving from the claim of THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA that it
had a lawful contract must be compensated under the Proposed Remedy or by a common law de jour jury or any
such mechanism as can be found to be effective.

The Book
68
Public Information

As Good As AVAL
_______________________________________________________
Peter-Andrew: Nolan Principal. Only in the capacity as beneficiary of
the Original Jurisdiction. Third party Intervener and aggrieved party.
th
Done this...................Day of the Eleventh Month of the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Ten Anno Domini, (4
November AD2010) near London, England.
JURAT:
ss: Sworn and subscribed near the city of London, on this day personally appeared before me Peter-Andrew:
Nolan known to me to be the living breathing life-force free man described herein who executed the foregoing
instrument acknowledged to me that Peter-Andrew: Nolan executed the same as his free act and deed as true,
correct complete and not misleading.
KNOW all men that I, ______________________________ of London, England, at the request of Peter-Andrew:
Nolan , there being no notary public readily available, did on the Fourth Day of November 2010 Anno Domini,
witness the above autograph of Peter-Andrew: Nolan before
_____________________________________ and
_____________________________________.
Yours Faithfully,
By,
(Autographed)
Witness 1 ...
Date: .
Witness 2

The Book
69
Public Information
Proposed Remedy
The re-presentatives of THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA have made quite a nuisance of themselves to
the Principal these last three years.
The loss sustained by Principal has been in excess of $A350,000. The Principal has had his house stolen and sold
against his will, his children kidnapped against his will. He has been subject to extortion and theft. All these crimes
were predicated and perpetrated by re-presentatives of THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA based on the
false claim that there was a binding contract created by the placing of the Principals Signature on the Certificate of
Marriage.
Therefore, Principal claims the following damages to be paid as fair and just compensation for the loss of property,
money, children, and time taken to remedy this crime against him.
Loss of Property:
Loss of Money: Watts McCray:
Time and effort for Remedy:
General pain and suffering:
Loss of children:
$A290,000
$A45,000
$A100,000
$A100,000
$A2
Total:
$A535,002.
(1,000 hours at $A100/hour)

($A1 per child)
th
This amount to be placed into the following account by 25 December 2010.

Name:
Address:
Bank:
BSB:
Account Number:
Peter Nolan
c/- xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wagga Wagga
NSW 2650
St. George Bank
xxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxx
Since Respondent is well aware that THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA can create this money out of
nothing with no effort or expense at all Respondent is encouraged to take the easy way out of simply making a
payment of mythical money and we can all live happily ever after.
Should the Respondent believe that there is any false point on the above affidavit or wish to contest Principals
th
Claim then counter claim my be lodged with the Principal by the date of 30 November 2010.
Should no response be forthcoming it will be determined that Respondent has accepted the points of this Affidavit
and a Default Judgement will be generated by the Principal and sent to the Respondent.

The Book
70
Public Information
Notice of Intent
The re-presentatives of the THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA have been singularly unwilling to respond
to prior Lawful Notices. Just in case the Respondent continues this trend Principal wishes to make clear his Intent
should this Remedy Payment not be made by 25th December 2010.
Principal retains the right to issue a default judgement on his own signature and authority as Beneficiary to the
Original Jurisdiction, to place liens against the property of Respondent or to form a court dejour and present
matters of fact to the court de jour to make a judgement as to any and all violations of the property rights of
Principal and any remedy for those violations.
Principal advises Respondent that non-response is considered dis-honour under law and that Principal reserves
the right to generate default judgments by his own signature and authority as Beneficiary to the Original
Jurisdiction, place liens against the Respondents property to be seized by the appropriate Sheriff, or convene a
court dejour to persue remedy should Respondent choose to go into dis-honour.
Yours Sincerely
By
Peter-Andrew: Nolan
Human Being
Signed
___________________________________
All Rights, Privileges and Powers Reserved Without
Prejudice
Date: ______________________________

The Book
71
Public Information
21.
A WORD ON PROSTITUTION
One man who commented on what I was writing told me I suggest you make a comment on prostitution in your
book.
I thought that was a good idea. So here it is. My opinion about prostitution. Men can make of it what they will.
Prostitution is only illegal. It is not unlawful. The legislation and statutes that apply to prostitution only apply to your
strawman. They do not apply to you, the human being. If you and some woman wish to come to some agreement
as to exchanging something that you both see is of value and that transaction is agreeable to you both then no-one
else has any right to tell you what you can and can not do. You can lawfully notice your local Policy Enforcement
Officers of this and tell them that should they try to enforce their legislation on you that you will seek justice in a
properly convened court de jour.
Western women are liars and hypocrites and prostitution is one of their BIGGEST lies. Their expressed opinion of
prostitution exposes their hypocrisy in spades.
Hundreds of millions of women claim My body my choice when it comes to killing their own babies. Um? What
exactly is the mans choice in the murder of HIS baby? Oh, thats right, men dont have babies, men have liabilities,
and dont you men forget that. Women claim they can kill the baby of a man at any time it is in the womb. Go
check it out if you do not believe me. The few women who do NOT claim this stand by and allow other women to do
this. The 2 BILLION abortions that are estimated to have taken place since 1970 make it pretty clear what women
think about my body my choice.
But, with all this empowerment and my body my choice what do women say about OTHER women who are
willing to have sex for money? Oh? THOSE women are not entitled to my body my choice. THOSE women must
be stopped from being evil prostitutes while they have a right to be an enlightened and celebrated baby killer.
Really? And who, exactly is hurt by the act of prostitution? No one. There is no dead foetus in the garbage bin at
the end of a roll in the hay between a man and a woman like there is at the end of an abortion.
The whole issue of women denouncing prostitution is one area where their lies and hypocrisy are so in your face
that you simply can not make excuses for them and believe the rubbish they come up with. Either an adult is free to
do as they please where they cause no injury, harm or loss to anyone else, or they are not.
Women and their mangina lackeys are the ONLY people who are so hypocritical they will argue the toss about this.
In ANY case what is marriage other than prostitution that is acceptable? Not much else today. What was my wife
other than a prostitute? My wife lied to me from the very first date. If she lied to me from the very first date what
was she lying for? To get money. How did she get money? By pretending to love me. What is that called? That is
called prostitution. Men ask me if I have ever used a prostitute. My answer is simple. I say:
Sure I have. I was with a prostitute for 23 years. I just didnt know it. I consider prostitutes to be FAR ABOVE my
ex on a moral scale since prostitutes dont lie to men about what they are doing whereas my ex lied to everyone
about what she was doing. Yet, still women will support a lying woman who was clearly a prostitute and denounce
honest women who are prostitutes. Thank you for the opportunity to explain the hypocrisy of women one more
time.
My opinion is that if an adult man and an adult woman both agree to have sex and they are happy about the
exchange of value that takes place, be it cash-money or matri-money, and no-one is harmed?
They can do whatever they please.
And all those women who claim they should be able to tell someone ELSE what they should and should not do? I
recommend you just ignore them and go about your business. They are such clear hypocrites.

The Book
72
Public Information
One of the good things that will come out of men learning how to deny the jurisdiction of the courts is that
prostitution is likely to become far more widespread, far safer for all, and very likely far less expensive. The only
reason that prostitution is so expensive, so dangerous, so linked to criminal activities is because it is a crime.
It is like the days of prohibition in the US. By making alcohol illegal all that happened was that it was controlled by
criminals and quite some crimes and violence followed. Alcohol became of poor quality. Many died from bad
booze. Criminal gangs fought for control of the alcohol trade. It was all rather like the drugs trade today. Only the
most poorly informed people are not aware that the drugs trade is actually run by our govments.
In Germany? Where prostitution is legal? It is well regulated and there is little social stigma attached to it. Sure.
The women dont like it. And the married men denounce it so as to keep in good with the wife. Or perhaps some of
the married men really do disapprove. I cant tell the difference. But why should there be any social stigma or
hatred of prostitutes? It is the worlds oldest profession. Its not like people dont know that prostitution happens. It
is only women who want to retain their power by being the sole suppliers of sex, a monopoly, that object to
prostitution. Women and their tame manginas.
Indeed? If women did not use sex as a weapon against men? If wives were more forthcoming with sex for their
husbands? Prostitution would markedly decline. Everyone knows that the largest group of men who use the
services of prostitutes are actually married men. Now? Why would this be? It would be because the wife uses sex
as a weapon against the husband. And just to make it clear? Even when men are faithful in marriage, as I was, in
the face of a wife using sex as a weapon? We are not appreciated or rewarded for our good behaviour. Indeed? I
was hated on by western women just as much as the worst of cheating husbands. Gee. Thanks.
If women are going to treat the best of husbands just as badly as the worst of husbands? Would any man be
surprised that the man will seek comfort in the arms of another woman? And even if the other woman is not a
formal prostitute we all know that she is angling for his money if he has any.
Women STILL somehow miraculously fall in love with men who have more money than them a staggering 90% of
the time. Gee. What a co-incidence. The number of women who marry down is still very small. So much for
equality.
And again to point out the hypocrisy of women.
Women like Helen Girly Brown and Andrea Dworkin were prostitutes. Yet they are revered as heroines of the
feminist movement. Lets not forget that MANY of the leading feminists who are respected were prostitutes or
sluts. Germaine Greer admits that she has sex with SEVEN different men in her THREE WEEK MARRIAGE. Yet
she is lauded as an example of all a woman can be and a hero to women. Do you men think women would laud
as a hero to men a man who had sex with SEVEN WOMEN in a three week marriage? Do I need to remind you
men about the reaction of women to Bill Clintons blow job?
Women laud and champion women who have been prostitutes and sluts and turn that into hatred of men.
Yet those same women hate on men who use the services of prostitutes and actually really like women.
Just more hypocrisy from our women folk.
It is EVERYWHERE you look.
So my opinion on prostitution stands as:
Two Sovereigns are free to do as they please so long as they agree.
No-one else has any right to tell two sovereigns what they can and can not agree to.

The Book
73
Public Information
22.
A WORD ON LAWYERS AND BARRISTERS
Having just written a word on prostitutes it seems only entirely fair to also write a word on lawyers and barristers as
follows. Not that I intend to denigrate prostitutes by putting their page next to the lawyers and barristers page.
My disgust at the lawyers in the Family Law area knows no bounds. They are even bigger scumbags than the
Policy Enforcement Officers. Your average Policy Enforcement Officer is a man of little education and much
indoctrination doing his best on a relatively meagre salary. They are, in many cases, doing the best they can with
what the good lord gave them. In many cases they dont have a lot of options.
But lawyers and barristers? These men are well educated. They are paid vastly too well. They live lives of luxury as
they gorge themselves on the carcases of honest men of honour and integrity who wanted nothing more than to be
the fathers to the children they had. My disgust for these men knows no bounds. None at all. I will not rest until
every single family law lawyer is flipping burgers. NOT EVER.
I have taken vow to put ALL FAMILY LAW LAWYERS AND BARRISTERS OUT OF BUSINESS. These scum
should never be allowed any position of any responsibility EVER AGAIN.
If you take my scumbag lawyer calling himself Justin Dowd as just one example? I presented this man with
extensive evidence of the genocide being committed in Australia. He CHARGED ME $A3,000 to read these
materials and when I asked him if he was willing to help me break the news of this crime he told me he was not
interested and didnt know any other lawyers who were interested in exposing this genocide either. Thats what
these people are like. How big a scumbag can one man be?
When I pointed out the Justin that common law was superior to legislation and statutes he argued this was not the
case. I have the email trail. And when I presented him with the Robert McClelland presentation saying that, indeed,
common law was superior to legislation and the only mechanism for protecting individual property rights did Justin
Dowd say Gee, sorry Peter, I was wrong, let me tell ALL MY LAWYERS MATES about this important error we
have made. Nope. Just silence from the scumbag Justin Dowd.
And dont even bother to get me started on the other criminal scumbag lawyer I had in Australia called Jacqueline
Vincent. That woman was such a liar that when I met with her face to face on March 7th 2008 it was clear she was
a lying bitch. I just didnt know what she was lying about. It turned out to be everything. How this woman expects
to raise her child when she is such a lying bitch and a criminal of the worst kind is beyond me. I pity her child. Poor
kid has no chance at all with a bitch like that for a mother.
And try taking a look at Fiona Brassil of Daniel Springs in Dublin and Sarah Bevan of her own firm in Australia who
were Jennifers Lawyers. Look what THOSE bitches did!!
Everything from suborning perjury to lying blatantly to filling my exes head full of lies so as to attack her husband
and take a path that would destroy her family and impoverish herself? With friends like Fiona Brassil and Sarah
Bevan who needs enemies?
You men should have no doubt in your mind. ALL the Family Law Lawyers know that Family Law is a complete
scam to destroy the family such that they can gorge themselves on the carcases of the families they destroy. ANY
Family Law Lawyer who tries to tell you different is just lying to you. Period. You should just call them a liar to their
face. Try reading the transcript of what Sarah Bevan said in the meeting with David Dunkley. Here is the link
again:
http://www.peternolan.com/LinkClick.aspx?link=PAC6601_2007+20091126Reissue+Final.pdf&tabid=538&mid=123
0
She actually goes so far as to say that the court should have no concern about justice for me because, you know,
Im not willing to be a slave. Bitches like this belong on the street pushing all their worldly good before them in a
shopping cart. Bitches like this are paid MONEY to spout this sort of man-hatred? And women wonder why I have
no respect for them? They should try reading what Sarah Bevan said in the court and notice that no women will
denounce her for the lying bitch she is.

The Book
74
Public Information
Women will say she was just doing her job. Well? So where the german soldiers shoving Jews, gypsies, gays,
the infirm and elderly into gas chambers. It doesnt make it right.
I was just following orders and I was just doing my job were shown not to be a reasonable defence at the
Nuremberg trials.
So to all you men out there? Let me make it very, very clear to you. With respect to common law contracts you
have the right to go to a de jour court to settle any disputes. You have the right to use an Affidavit with an attached
Proposed Remedy and Notice of Intent to settle your disputes.
Leave these blood sucking leeches of lawyers OUT OF THE LOOP. Put them out of business. Starve them to
death. Thats what they deserve.
And just like policy enforcement officers? For any man who can bring me an Affidavit with an attached Proposed
Remedy and Notice of Intent to settle your disputes with lawyers who then refuse to settle the dispute? You will be
welcome to the courts we create in Ireland and Australia to gain remedy from these criminals. Pretty much ALL the
wealth they have gained they gained as the proceeds of crimes. It should be taken from them by any man who can
prove that a crime was committed against him by these scumbags.
In my own education it only took me about three months to realise that there was an underlying law system
beneath the Uniform Commercial Code of Legislation. I was reading about UCC and noticed it talked about how the
UCC had to work in harmony with underlying law systems which begged the question, what underlying law
systems?
In Australia and Ireland this is common law. Same for the US, Canada, India, New Zealand etc.
Now. If I can find this out in three months as a layman? What do you think the lawyers know about this? Do you
think they can really go to law school for SEVEN YEARS and not know that the common law system is superior in
Australia? No. Not possible. And this is evidenced by the fact that plenty of lawyers, like Justin Dowd, try very hard
to tell me that legislation, being UCC, was superior to common law only to go totally quiet when it was
demonstrated to them this was not the case. The give away was that, once defeated in this argument, they DID
NOT then go out into the public and announce their mistake.
Ive done the same thing to 3-4 lawyers or people with law degrees in public places like The Spearhead or the
Irish Free Man site.
Simply put. There is no credibility in the argument that lawyers do not know that they are scammers because when
it is revealed to one he is a criminal scumbag scammer there is no remorse and no effort to address the situation.
Just look at Justin Dowd and Jacqueline Vincent. When they were exposed as criminal scumbags what did they
do? They just blocked emails and then continue on with Business As Usual. What scumbags these people are.
Men? I strongly advise you to talk to as many men as you can and denounce these scumbag lawyers and
barristers for the scumbags they are. Tell men they can use common law courts with de jour juries in all former
British colony countries.
Tell them they would be well advised to starve a lawyer today. Because thats what lawyers and barristers
deserve. They deserve to be starved of any money that comes from gorging themselves on the carcases of
families, especially the carcases of fathers and husbands who were doing their best.
These scumbags do this EVERY DAY OF THE WEEK.

The Book
75
Public Information
23.
A WORD ON THE SEXISM AND GENDER POLITICS OF WOMEN
Everything that western women do to men relies on the western woman being able to lie to the man and the man
believing the lies. Its that simple. If you simply do not trust what a woman says to you then you will be relatively
safe. This is why women push so hard with the you have to trust me crap they go on with and why they make out
they are so hurt when you tell them you dont trust them. Indeed the Illuminati is changing the meaning of
misogyny to mis-trust of women. Something that all intelligent men will do now.
Let me tell you about women and trust and their gender politics. When I separated Jennifer told a whole series of
lies in the affidavits and this is perjury. Did ANY woman say this was not ok? Nope. NOT ONE!
WESTERN WOMEN ALMOST UNIVERSALLY CONDONE PEJURY.
You, as a man, should never, ever lose sight of the fact that women condone perjury across a wide range of false
allegations. This is called lying. They know they condone this lying. This is why they have to scream abuse at any
man who calls them liars. Its because it is true. If it was not true they would rebut the allegation, not scream abuse.
Now. When I was separating from her Jennifer abused my mother. I wrote a letter to the International Womens
Club of Dublin. This was the most exclusive club of women in Ireland. These women would call themselves the
cream of women. More like off yoghurt if you ask my opinion. Of ALL these women was ONE of them honest?
No. NOT ONE. NONE of them would condemn Jennifers perjury.
2.5 years later on? I sent another open letter to this group of women. I had posted Jennifers perjurous statements,
evidence of her stealing, and evidence of her committing adultery. I made the point that her new employer has
every right to know she is a thief and has stolen money from her own company previously. I also made the point
that the new man had a right to know that she was an adulteress who had viciously and ruthlessly attacked her
husband even though she had promised to settle amicably to her own children.
I asked for the contact details of these people so that they could be given the evidence of Jennifers crimes so they
are forewarned. This is a public service to innocent people inadvertently dealing with a criminal.
Here is the question. How many women do you think actually told me these details? Of course, the answer is none.
Your women, and I mean pretty much ALL your women, will protect a woman who is a criminal from being exposed
let alone actually punish them. You, young man, have a right to be well aware that women will protect criminal
women.
If you think your women are going to be honest with you? I have a bridge I want to sell you.
If you think women are not totally sexist against men? I have a bridge I want to sell you.
If you think women are not totally committed to Gender Politics? I have a bridge I want to sell you.
In 2.5 years not a single woman will even enter into the discussion as to whether women who commit crimes
against men should be punished for that. THEY WILL NOT EVEN TALK ABOUT IT. So you, young man, should
listen to what that tells you. Because what they tells you is that women wish to be privileged to the extent that they
can commit crimes against you with complete impunity.
You, young man, should NEVER lose site of the fact that even the best of the good women gladly and willingly
cover up for women who are criminals.

The Book
76
Public Information
24.
A WORD ON THE RULE OF LAW
This is going to be a very controversial word on the rule of law. But hey, I am not concerned about controversy.
Today men are so badly abused they do not have the protection of the law. If you are a man in the English
speaking western world there is no rule of law for you today. There is only the satanic priests of the UCC courts
wanting to steal from you and plenty of women who will help them do it for their cut. I have, for three years,
pursued the rule of law and for justice to be done in my particular case. Suffice to say I am hated on by pretty
much ALL western women and not a few men as well for having the temerity to wish to avail of the protection of the
law. If a man attempts to gain justice for himself without taking the law into his own hands he can be assured he
will be hated on for doing so. Fine.
Something that you, young man, should be very aware of is this. When you are not the beneficiary of the protection
of the rule of law you also have no obligation to obey the law. None at all. You should not forget that. The rule of
law works BOTH WAYS or NO WAYS. You are afforded the protection of the rule of law as part of the social
contract of obeying the laws of the people of the land you are living on.
If the protection of the law is withdrawn from you then you should rightly feel no obligation to obey anything that
someone might call the law. I certainly do not.
And here is something else men might want to know for themselves. When a man is falsely accused or is going to
be taken to the cleaners in the Family Court it is not lose 50% of your stuff.
As in my case David Dunkley sent 95% of the assets I worked for all those years to Jennifer. You men should know
that:
5% is the new 50% if you happen to be a man.
Quite literally. They are going to do everything they can to make sure YOUR LIFE IS OVER.
If you do not believe that then you should talk to a few men who have come out the other side. Or you should take
a look at the suicide statistics of men in divorce or false rape allegations. Go ask men about this on www.thespearhead.com.
What does this all mean? Well? It means you have to ask yourself a question. In the absence of the rule of law how
are you going to protect yourself from these lawless women and lawless legal system? Because if you do not
protect yourself I can assure you that no-one else is going to protect you for you.
But how can you protect yourself from your wife when she attacks you using the satanic criminal courts and when
no-one else will lend you assistance to be with your children? How can you stop YOUR life being over? Well?
People will not like what I say next but thats THEIR problem.
The protagonist is removed from their position of abusive power. The soon to be ex-wife has a fatal accident.
We are now seeing more and more men simply kill their soon to be ex-wife and very often we are seeing them also
kill their children. Many times these men are then also killing themselves. If men are feeling so abused that they are
willing to kill their wife and children and not JUST themselves then its high time people listened up. I have
consistently talked about one estimate of 4,000 men in Australia kill themselves each year from the abuse they
receive from the Family Court and CSA. And you know what? No-one cares about them. They really dont.
Well? How long is it going to be before men figure this out. That if their soon to be ex-wife has a fatal accident that
they will get the kids, the house, HER life insurance policy, and his future income. Indeed. HIS life is no longer
over. Just HERS is over. If you dont believe me when I say this is happening and that incidents of this are going
to become more frequent. Watch this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptDBhpmR8Cc&feature=player_embedded

The Book
77
Public Information
How long can it be before the more intelligent of men figure out that the best way for such an accident to happen
is via the old Stranger on a Train mechanism. That is. The man finds another man that has the same problem that
has NO CONNECTION to him and they trade problems.
Because there is NO connection between the two men and NO connection between the two men and the women
involved the probability of being found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt for any crime is ALMOST ZERO.
How long can it be before the more intelligent men, who really want the best for their children, who really want to be
with their children, figure out that arranging a Stranger on a Train fatal accident is FAR more likely to lead to a
good life than to go into the satanic criminal courts?
My own opinion? It cant be long at all. There was a recent case in South Africa where a man killed his wife and
stuffed her in the freezer. He then killed a later partner and they re-opened the case about the wife who ran off.
They found her in the freezer. The father was quoted in the article saying something like:
If he did not want to be married to her why not just divorce her? Why did he have to kill her?
Well. The answer would be that if he did HIS life would be destroyed and from HIS point of view committing murder
looked like a MUCH BETTER OPTION.
I have been telling people for a while now that the murder rate of wives and children by distressed fathers has been
seemingly rising. I have been telling people that if just 10% if the men who decide they are going to commit suicide
would kill the judge/magistrate or the wife/children first we will have an epidemic of murder and dead people on our
hands.
All intelligent men know that my proposal to get the satanic criminal scumbags of the Family Court OUT OF THE
FAMILY and to starve a family law lawyer today by using the Arbitration Panel instead of the Family Court is
actually a very viable alternative to the Family Court.
My warning to all intelligent men, and women and children, is this. If these proposals are not taken up? If women
continue to support perjury, kidnapping, extortion and theft as they do today? Then the most intelligent of the men
they are attacking are going to start organising Stranger on a train fatal accidents for their wives.
As far as I see it? This is inevitable. When a woman makes the mans BEST OPTION her own MURDER she had
better start thinking about just how smart that move is.
I am not advocating murder. I am merely saying that when you make a mans best option murder? Some of those
men WILL take that option without any hesitation at all.
If the wholesale slaughter of Family Law Judges/Magistrates/Lawyers and vindictive wives and the innocent
children is what you men reading this sentence really want?
Just continue to do nothing as you are mostly doing now. And dont bitch to me when my prediction about the
murder rate comes true.
But if you want more stable and secure marriages? If you want fewer dead wives and children? Then teach other
men about the ideas in this book. Spread the word. Give men a path to justice via Arbitration Panels and de jour
courts. Protect the rights of your fellow men when they are victims of crime. Because if you do not protect their
rights when they are victims of crime? They might just take justice into their own hands, which they have every right
to do. And since the only form of justice that will work for them is one where there are no witnesses to report what
happened? That form of justice will require killing people.
So? Those men who read this and then do nothing? You will have the blood of these people who are subsequently
murdered on your hands because you chose not to give men a path to justice when they had crimes committed
against them.
I can see a day when things could become very, very bad if men do not implement the ideas in this book or
similarly effective strategies.

The Book
78
Public Information
25.
WHAT DO WOMEN WANT?
A lot of men asked me to include more about women themselves in this book. So here is a little bit of my opinion on
women now.
There was a funny Mel Gibson movie about this called What Women Want. It just wasnt correct.
It is now politically incorrect to talk about what women want because it is only by not being talked about it that
men can be entrapped into giving women what it is they want.
So read this sentence. It is the most important sentence in this book. One often overlooked by men.
Most women want babies.

That is it. They want babies. The physiological role of women in the human race is to produce the babies.
Whether you believe in Adam and Eve or evolution, you have to agree that a woman can have a baby and a man
cannot. We are yet to see science advance so far as to allow a man to have a baby.
Women are created to make babies. Politically incorrect. Absolutely true. I am reminded of a Russian woman I
was dating. I asked her if she would ever consider not having babies. She stood before me and said;
Peter, look at me. I am a woman. The purpose of my existence is to have babies.
Western women are rarely that honest.
We joke about the ticking biological clock and nesting instinct. Its funny because it is true.
As a man? If you want to be with a woman on a long term basis you are well advised to understand first and
foremost women want babies. You, as the man, are completely irrelevant with the exception of what else women
want. Any man will do. Re-read the Woolly Mammoth story if you think this is not so.
You can see this is a fact when you look at the army of baby-mammas that are being produced all around the
world. They will go and get themselves pregnant from any thug in any bar and then demand the welfare state pay
for them and their babies. So this next statement is something that every man should know.
Most women want someone else to pay for THEIR babies so they can have the maximum
amount of time with them.
And if you do not believe that statement I would invite you to go into mens groups and ask just how often it
happens that the wifey gets her two or three babies and then quits work never to return. It is a VERY frequent
occurrence. There are MANY men out there totally enslaved to high mortgages and wives who promised to work
and then refused to once the babies arrived. I was one of them.
So, if you combine the two together and you realise that women want babies and money you will have the most
accurate of all descriptions of what women want.
So, if you are a woman and you are reading this and you are offended? I warned you at the front to put the book
down.
So, to simplify the message for you because you are a man and it works for you to have the message as simple as
possible. It is this
Most women want babies and money.

The Book
79
Public Information
You, Sir, are completely un-necessary with the exception that if you provide the sperm for the babies you are likely
to have to provide the money for the baby as well. You need to know, for your own benefit
The woman does not want you, she wants your sperm and your money. Thats it.
Now, your woman cannot say that because if she did you would run away very quickly. She has to get your sperm
and your money from you by saying something else.. Forewarned is forearmed.
If you do not believe me on this? Just google Paternity Fraud. If women did not want this statement being made
about them in general then they would have behaved a little better for the last 40 years.
One of the events that really woke me up to this was as follows. I was talking with one of my lady friends. We shall
call her Sue1 here. Sue1 is just wonderful and at one time the question of being together or even possibly being
married was discussed.
The situation was that she wanted more babies and I did not. Its a very normal issue. We spent nearly a year with
each of us persuading the other to our point of view. One conversation we had is worth you knowing about young
man.
Sue1: When we are married, if I change my mind and decide I want a baby, we can have a miracle baby.
Peter: Really? A miracle baby? What is that? I dont know what you mean by that.
Sue1: That is where I go and get a baby from another man and I tell you that it is your baby and its a miracle!
Peter: Thats really interesting. But dont you think I might be a little upset about that?
Sue1: Peter. If you do not want to pay for any baby a woman has you must not marry her.
Peter: Really? Ive never heard that before. Do you think other women think like this?
Sue1: All us women think like this. But I am honest!!!
I went on to check this statement out with other eastern European women. It turns out that ALL of them said pretty
much the same thing. A woman will get a baby any way she pleases and try and pin it on a man to pay for it.
Sometimes it is the husband but it is often not.
Another conversation I had with an eastern European woman went like this. She was a friend of a friend.
Peter: I mentioned in passing that my wife became accidentally pregnant when she was young.
Sue2: You western men are so stupid. No woman gets accidentally pregnant.
Peter: Really? Can you tell me more about that?
Sue2: Sure. We are women. We know what makes us pregnant. We know when we can get pregnant. So if we
want to get pregnant we know just exactly how to do it. And if we do NOT want to be pregnant we know just exactly
how to do that too. No women get accidentally pregnant. You western men are so dumb you will believe anything.
I had to admit I really laughed at her calling me so dumb. Because in this respect I clearly was.
I also checked THIS comment out with a number of other women as well and yep, they told me pretty much the
same thing. That in most cases the accidental pregnancy was well and truly planned.
If you, young man, have any doubts as to the truth of some of these comments? I suggest you go to mens groups
and ask the older men about these things. You have a right to know how badly you have been lied to. You have a
right to have the opportunity to make sure you do not finish up in the same boat as me. Getting MINUS EUR40K
after 26 years of working. THAT is how much women care about you. Not at all.

The Book
80
Public Information
25.1. More Wisdom from Sue1

Just after I separated I happened to meet a Ukrainian woman. We will call her Sue1 in this book. Our first meeting
in November 2007 was just one of those accidents that happen that was very brief, friendly and fun. I was looking
for Wife 2.0 whom I wanted to be of similar cultural background to me. Sue1 didnt qualify as I realised she was
not western almost immediately I saw her and we only chatted enough to know each others names and faces.
Five minutes tops.
As things happen, there are accidents in life that lead to something. I started a relationship with a western woman
soon after my separation and that ended during March 2008. That very weekend I happened to bump into Sue1
again. Life is strange like that. We had this chat and we decided that we might like to get to know each other better.
Well? We did for nearly 2.5 years on and off with some ups and downs normally associated with new relationships.
What impressed me most about Sue1 was her humility, honesty, integrity, care and concern, sympathy and
support. There are more things but those are the highlights.
She happened to bump into me the exact same week I started the process of dis-owning my former children. This
was a process wherein I nearly killed myself many times. I was suicidal all that April in 2008. It was only the May
Day party that I went to that year that I first started coming out of my suicidal stage. I am very lucky it was only a
month for me. Many men spend years feeling suicidal when their children are taken from them. A major reason I
chose to dis-own my former children was that they were so dear to me and I loved them so much that if I were to
perform my duty to protect them I would have had to have Jennifer killed.
Since I did not want her killed my former children had to be dis-owned as they were being badly abused by
Jennifer. It was just their bad luck one entire sex totally and utterly supports and sanctions child abuse while also
supporting removing the protector from the children. The responsibility of the abuse of my former children rests on
the shoulders of Jennifer and ALL those women who refused to assist me in that situation and ALL those OTHER
women who did not speak out about this kind of abuse going on over the last 40 years.
Sue1 has said so many things to me over the 2.5 years we were dating that they are worth recording for you young
men. Things like the comment above about the miracle baby. She didnt know what I was going through at that
time (April 2008). She just knew something was terribly wrong and I wouldnt talk about it. She gave me affection
and support during this time that no other woman did. I did have another woman friend, who was married, giving
me words of encouragement that were also greatly appreciated. She is now one of my best friends in the world. I
am very loyal to my friends. In direct contrast to how western wives are to husbands now. Sadly, only two women
could be bothered to assist me at this most difficult of times.
I put in here some of the things that Sue1 and I said. You might learn from these. This is what a lovely woman is
like.
At that May Day Party. When I was still suicidal. She knocked her bread roll off her plate but it did not fall to the
floor. She grabbed the bread roll quickly and waived it at me and said words to the effect:
Sue1: I am so happy that did not fall on the floor so I can still eat it. Did you know that in the Ukraine, when a
bread roll falls to the ground and if we can pick it up and it is not spoiled that we say a small prayer to God thanking
him for saving this bread roll for us? After all, many people dont have even bread to eat.
Can you imagine a western feminist woman saying a prayer and being thankful for a bread roll not being spoiled
when it fell to the ground? Western feminist women are not thankful for anything. Everything is an entitlement. Not
something to be thankful for. This incident was the first time it occurred to me to actually have a future. It really
caught my attention.
Peter: Tell me, if we were to be married, what would make you happy in marriage?
Sue1: Peter, women do not know what makes them happy. A woman has to be told what she can have by her
man and told to be happy about it. Then she will be happy.
Can you imagine a western feminist woman saying that? No. You cant. What she was telling me was that if we
were to marry the way to make her happy was as a child. To tell her what she can have and tell her to be happy
about it. The level of personal happiness of western women is plummeting and this has been widely reported. This
is why.
The Book
81
Public Information
I loved this one. This was the second time she snapped at me as in made an angry comment. She was very
tired and a little out of sorts on the day. She had misunderstood something I said to her and reacted what for her
was angrily.
Peter: I have told you once before. Speaking angrily to me like that is totally unacceptable. I wont tolerate it. You
have to apologise right now and never do that again.
Sue1 (laughing hysterically by the way): Peter. Do you think THAT is going to make me behave? No. It wont. A
man has to put his woman in her place. When she is angry to him like that? He needs to stomp on her and put her
down so that she will not try doing that again for a long, long time. If he does not do that? She will fight him all day
every day. She will make his life miserable until he learns to put her in her place. Do you not know this?
Peter: Sue1. I have told you. I grew up in a house with three boys. The only woman in the house was my mum.
Tell me, how do you think I would have gone if I tried to stomp on my mother and put her in her place?
Sue1 (She looked at me with a deepening frown and concern, a very worried look) : Hmmm.I can see that you
and I are going to fight a lot when we are married.
Sue1 is a VERY strong willed woman which is both good and bad. She could see from my lack of experience at
putting a woman in her place as she called it would cause a LOT of problems between us. It would be something I
would have to learn how to do.
This was one of the major issues in my marriage as well. I had been taught that women were adults and that they
were responsible for their actions and so insisted that my wife take responsibility for her actions. Alas, she could
not, and it was, indeed, cruel to expect her to. But this is the brainwashing us men were subject to. In this book I
propose two affidavits. One for the woman to claim equality before the law and other for her to waive her rights and
claim to be chattel property of a man. I rather suspect that a LOT of men will ONLY offer the deal of chattel
property and I also rather suspect a LOT of women will take that deal.
There is NOTHING WRONG for a woman to made the trade (if you want to call it that) of having the man be the
head of the household with the obligation and responsibility for making sure his wife and children are provided for
in return for her being obedient to his decisions. After all? The responsibility clearly lay with him. Why should he
carry that responsibility should he not have the appropriate authority to act in all matters.
If women do not like this? They can have their turkey baster kids and provide for themselves. After 40 years of
feminism how many happily married couples do we see where one is the mother of turkey baster kids and the
other is a woman who labours for 45-60 hours a week for 48-50 weeks of the year for 45 years to provide for her
and her children? This is so rare I have not heard of a case yet. But it used to be EVERY MAN. If women are so
equal why are they not doing what men have done for thousand of years yet? Labour to pay for someone else and
HER children?
If you try and tell a western woman they are like a child and not responsible for their actions they will hurl abuse at
you. BUTTHENWhen they commit a crime and you try to gain justice by holding them responsible for their
actions they make up all these reasons why the woman is not responsible for her actions and hurl abuse at you for
that too!! I know. Ive had so much abuse hurled at me for wanting Jennifer to be held accountable for her perjury,
kidnapping, extortion and theft its just not funny. I just dismiss all abuse by women now as background noise.
The repeating pattern, of course, with western women, is that the simply hurl abuse at men to get whatever they
want now. Any man who is not doing what princess wants gets abuse hurled at him. Any thanks for a job well
done? Nope. Forget that now with western women.
The idea that you catch more flies with honey than vinegar is gone with western women. The truth has nothing to
do with their endless diatribe of abuse thrown at men by western women. This is one reason I never listen to the
abuse western women throw around any more. Eastern women like Sue1 know that you catch more flies with
honey than with vinegar. So they talk nicely to me.

The Book
82
Public Information
26.
WHAT DO WOMEN NOT WANT?
I have to say it. Women HATE betas. They hate beta providers with a passion. They will marry them after they
figure out that the alphas will not marry them. But they hate the man and hate themselves for settling.
If you are a beta-provider and you have a woman telling your how wonderful you are? She is lying to you. Its as
simple as that.
If you do not know this? Go to www.the-spearhead.com and ask the men there if women love or loath betaproviders.
You have read this and you have been warned.
Dont let that warning go to waste.

The Book
83
Public Information
27.
APPENDIX A - ON WOMEN.BY ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER
Every young man should do himself the favour of reading this: From here:
http://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html
These few words of Jouy, Sans les femmes le commencement de notre vie seroit priv de secours, le milieu de
plaisirs et la fin de consolation, more exactly express, in my opinion, the true praise of woman than Schillers
poem, Wrde der Frauen, which is the fruit of much careful thought and impressive because of its antithesis and
use of contrast. The same thing is more pathetically expressed by Byron in Sardanapalus, Act i, Sc. 2:
The very first
Of human life must spring from womans breast,
Your first small words are taught you from her lips,
Your first tears quenchd by her, and your last sighs
Too often breathed out in a womans hearing,
When men have shrunk from the ignoble care
Of watching the last hour of him who led them.
Both passages show the right point of view for the appreciation of women.
One need only look at a womans shape to discover that she is not intended for either too much mental or too much
physical work. She pays the debt of life not by what she does but by what she suffers by the pains of childbearing, care for the child, and by subjection to man, to whom she should be a patient and cheerful companion.
The greatest sorrows and joys or great exhibition of strength are not assigned to her; her life should flow more
quietly, more gently, and less obtrusively than mans, without her being essentially happier or unhappier.
Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our early childhood, for the simple reason that
they themselves are childish, foolish, and short-sighted in a word, are big children all their lives, something
intermediate between the child and the man, who is a man in the strict sense of the word. Consider how a young
girl will toy day after day with a child, dance with it and sing to it; and then consider what a man, with the very best
intentions in the world, could do in her place.
With girls, Nature has had in view what is called in a dramatic sense a striking effect, for she endows them for a
few years with a richness of beauty and a, fullness of charm at the expense of the rest of their lives; so that they
may during these years ensnare the fantasy of a man to such a degree as to make him rush into taking the
honourable care of them, in some kind of form, for a lifetime a step which would not seem sufficiently justified if
he only considered the matter. Accordingly, Nature has furnished woman, as she has the rest of her creatures, with
the weapons and implements necessary for the protection of her existence and for just the length of time that they
will be of service to her; so that Nature has proceeded here with her usual economy. Just as the female ant after
coition loses her wings, which then become superfluous, nay, dangerous for breeding purposes, so for the most
part does a woman lose her beauty after giving birth to one or two children; and probably for the same reasons.
Then again we find that young girls in their hearts regard their domestic or other affairs as secondary things, if not
as a mere jest. Love, conquests, and all that these include, such as dressing, dancing, and so on, they give their
serious attention.
The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower is it in reaching maturity. Man reaches the maturity of
his reasoning and mental faculties scarcely before he is eight-and-twenty; woman when she is eighteen; but hers is
reason of very narrow limitations. This is why women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what is
near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling matters to the most
important. It is by virtue of mans reasoning powers that he does not live in the present only, like the brute, but
observes and ponders over the past and future; and from this spring discretion, care, and that anxiety which we so
frequently notice in people.

The Book
84
Public Information
The advantages, as well as the disadvantages, that this entails, make woman, in consequence of her weaker
reasoning powers, less of a partaker in them. Moreover, she is intellectually short-sighted, for although her intuitive
understanding quickly perceives what is near to her, on the other hand her circle of vision is limited and does not
embrace anything that is remote; hence everything that is absent or past, or in the future, affects women in a less
degree than men. This is why they have greater inclination for extravagance, which sometimes borders on
madness. Women in their hearts think that men are intended to earn money so that they may spend it, if possible
during their husbands lifetime, but at any rate after his death.
As soon as he has given them his earnings on which to keep house they are strengthened in this belief. Although
all this entails many disadvantages, yet it has this advantagethat a woman lives more in the present than a man,
and that she enjoys it more keenly if it is at all bearable. This is the origin of that cheerfulness which is peculiar to
woman and makes her fit to divert man, and in case of need, to console him when he is weighed down by cares. To
consult women in matters of difficulty, as the Germans used to do in old times, is by no means a matter to be
overlooked; for their way of grasping a thing is quite different from ours, chiefly because they like the shortest way
to the point, and usually keep their attention fixed upon what lies nearest; while we, as a rule, see beyond it, for the
simple reason that it lies under our nose; it then becomes necessary for us to be brought back to the thing in order
to obtain a near and simple view. This is why women are more sober in their judgment than we, and why they see
nothing more in things than is really there; while we, if our passions are roused, slightly exaggerate or add to our
imagination.
It is because womens reasoning powers are weaker that they show more sympathy for the unfortunate than men,
and consequently take a kindlier interest in them. On the other hand, women are inferior to men in matters of
justice, honesty, and conscientiousness. Again, because their reasoning faculty is weak, things clearly visible and
real, and belonging to the present, exercise a power over them which is rarely counteracted by abstract thoughts,
fixed maxims, or firm resolutions, in general, by regard for the past and future or by consideration for what is absent
and remote. Accordingly they have the first and principal qualities of virtue, but they lack the secondary qualities
which are often a necessary instrument in developing it. Women may be compared in this respect to an organism
9
that has a liver but no gall-bladder. So that it will be found that the fundamental fault in the character of women is
that they have no sense of justice.
This arises from their deficiency in the power of reasoning already referred to, and reflection, but is also partly due
to the fact that Nature has not destined them, as the weaker sex, to be dependent on strength but on cunning; this
is why they are instinctively crafty, and have an ineradicable tendency to lie. For as lions are furnished with claws
and teeth, elephants with tusks, boars with fangs, bulls with horns, and the cuttlefish with its dark, inky fluid, so
Nature has provided woman for her protection and defence with the faculty of dissimulation, and all the power
which Nature has given to man in the form of bodily strength and reason has been conferred on woman in this
form.
Hence, dissimulation is innate in woman and almost as characteristic of the very stupid as of the clever.
Accordingly, it is as natural for women to dissemble at every opportunity as it is for those animals to turn to their
weapons when they are attacked; and they feel in doing so that in a certain measure they are only making use of
their rights. Therefore a woman who is perfectly truthful and does not dissemble is perhaps an impossibility. This is
why they see through dissimulation in others so easily; therefore it is not advisable to attempt it with them. From the
fundamental defect that has been stated, and all that it involves, spring falseness, faithlessness, treachery,
ungratefulness, and so on. In a court of justice women are more often found guilty of perjury than men. It is indeed
to be generally questioned whether they should be allowed to take an oath at all. From time to time there are
repeated cases everywhere of ladies, who want for nothing, secretly pocketing and taking away things from shop
counters.

The Book
85
Public Information
Nature has made it the calling of the young, strong, and handsome men to look after the propagation of the human
race; so that the species may not degenerate. This is the firm will of Nature, and it finds its expression in the
passions of women. This law surpasses all others in both age and power. Woe then to the man who sets up rights
and interests in such a way as to make them stand in the way of it; for whatever he may do or say, they will, at the
first significant onset, be unmercifully annihilated. For the secret, unformulated, nay, unconscious but innate moral
of woman is: We are justified in deceiving those who, because they care a little for us,that is to say for the
individual,imagine they have obtained rights over the species. The constitution, and consequently the welfare of
the species, have been put into our hands and entrusted to our care through the medium of the next generation
which proceeds from us; let us fulfil our duties conscientiously.
But women are by no means conscious of this leading principle in abstracto, they are only conscious of it in
concreto, and have no other way of expressing it than in the manner in which they act when the opportunity arrives.
So that their conscience does not trouble them so much as we imagine, for in the darkest depths of their hearts
they are conscious that in violating their duty towards the individual they have all the better fulfilled it towards the
species, whose claim upon them is infinitely greater. (A fuller explanation of this matter may be found in vol. ii., ch.
44, in my chief work, Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung.)
Because women in truth exist entirely for the propagation of the race, and their destiny ends here, they live more
for the species than for the individual, and in their hearts take the affairs of the species more seriously than those of
the individual. This gives to their whole being and character a certain frivolousness, and altogether a certain
tendency which is fundamentally different from that of man; and this it is which develops that discord in married life
which is so prevalent and almost the normal state.
It is natural for a feeling of mere indifference to exist between men, but between women it is actual enmity. This is
due perhaps to the fact that odium figulinum in the case of men, is limited to their everyday affairs, but with women
embraces the whole sex; since they have only one kind of business. Even when they meet in the street, they look
at each other like Guelphs and Ghibellines. And it is quite evident when two women first make each others
acquaintance that they exhibit more constraint and dissimulation than two men placed in similar circumstances.
This is why an exchange of compliments between two women is much more ridiculous than between two men.
Further, while a man will, as a rule, address others, even those inferior to himself, with a certain feeling of
consideration and humanity, it is unbearable to see how proudly and disdainfully a lady of rank will, for the most
part, behave towards one who is in a lower rank (not employed in her service) when she speaks to her. This may
be because differences of rank are much more precarious with women than with us, and consequently more
quickly change their line of conduct and elevate them, or because while a hundred things must be weighed in our
case, there is only one to be weighed in theirs, namely, with which man they have found favour; and again,
because of the one-sided nature of their vocation they stand in closer relationship to each other than men do; and
so it is they try to render prominent the differences of rank.
It is only the man whose intellect is clouded by his sexual instinct that could give that stunted, narrow-shouldered,
broad-hipped, and short-legged race the name of the fair sex; for the entire beauty of the sex is based on this
instinct. One would be more justified in calling them the unaesthetic sex than the beautiful. Neither for music, nor
for poetry, nor for fine art have they any real or true sense and susceptibility, and it is mere mockery on their part, in
their desire to please, if they affect any such thing.
This makes them incapable of taking a purely objective interest in anything, and the reason for it is, I fancy, as
follows.
A man strives to get direct mastery over things either by understanding them or by compulsion. But a woman is
always and everywhere driven to indirect mastery, namely through a man; all her direct mastery being limited to
him alone. Therefore it lies in womans nature to look upon everything only as a means for winning man, and her
interest in anything else is always a simulated one, a mere roundabout way to gain her ends, consisting of coquetry
and pretence. Hence Rousseau said, Les femmes, en gnral, naiment aucun art, ne se connoissent aucun et
nont aucun gnie (Lettre dAlembert, note xx.). Every one who can see through a sham must have found this to
be the case. One need only watch the way they behave at a concert, the opera, or the play; the childish simplicity,
for instance, with which they keep on chattering during the finest passages in the greatest masterpieces. If it is true
that the Greeks forbade women to go to the play, they acted in a right way; for they would at any rate be able to
hear something. In our day it would be more appropriate to substitute taceat mulier in theatro for taceat mulier in
ecclesia; and this might perhaps be put up in big letters on the curtain.
The Book
86
Public Information
Nothing different can be expected of women if it is borne in mind that the most eminent of the whole sex have
never accomplished anything in the fine arts that is really great, genuine, and original, or given to the world any
kind of work of permanent value. This is most striking in regard to painting, the technique of which is as much within
their reach as within ours; this is why they pursue it so industriously. Still, they have not a single great painting to
show, for the simple reason that they lack that objectivity of mind which is precisely what is so directly necessary in
painting. They always stick to what is subjective.
For this reason, ordinary women have no susceptibility for painting at all: for natura non facet saltum. And Huarte,
in his book which has been famous for three hundred years, Examen de ingenios para las scienzias, contends that
women do not possess the higher capacities. Individual and partial exceptions do not alter the matter; women are
and remain, taken altogether, the most thorough and incurable philistines; and because of the extremely absurd
arrangement which allows them to share the position and title of their husbands they are a constant stimulus to
his ignoble ambitions.
And further, it is because they are philistines that modern society, to which they give the tone and where they have
sway, has become corrupted. As regards their position, one should be guided by Napoleons maxim, Les femmes
nont pas de rang; and regarding them in other things, Chamfort says very truly:Elles sont faites pour commercer
avec nos faiblesses avec notre folie, mais non avec notre raison. Il existe entre elles et les hommes des
sympathies dpiderme et trs-peu de sympathies desprit dme et de caractre. They are the sexus sequior, the
second sex in every respect, therefore their weaknesses should be spared, but to treat women with extreme
reverence is ridiculous, and lowers us in their own eyes. When nature divided the human race into two parts, she
did not cut it exactly through the middle!
The difference between the positive and negative poles, according to polarity, is not merely qualitative but also
quantitative. And it was in this light that the ancients and people of the East regarded woman; they recognised her
true position better than we, with our old French ideas of gallantry and absurd veneration, that highest product of
ChristianTeutonic stupidity. These ideas have only served to make them arrogant and imperious, to such an
extent as to remind one at times of the holy apes in Benares, who, in the consciousness of their holiness and
inviolability, think they can do anything and everything they please.
In the West, the woman, that is to say the lady, finds herself in a fausse position; for woman, rightly named by the
ancients sexus sequior, is by no means fit to be the object of our honour and veneration, or to hold her head higher
than man and to have the same rights as he. The consequences of this fausse position are sufficiently clear.
Accordingly, it would be a very desirable thing if this Number Two of the human race in Europe were assigned her
natural position, and the lady-grievance got rid of, which is not only ridiculed by the whole of Asia, but would have
been equally ridiculed by Greece and Rome. The result of this would be that the condition of our social, civil, and
political affairs would be incalculably improved. The Salic law would be unnecessary; it would be a superfluous
truism.
The European lady, strictly speaking, is a creature who should not exist at all; but there ought to be housekeepers,
and young girls who hope to become such; and they should be brought up not to be arrogant, but to be
domesticated and submissive. It is exactly because there are ladies in Europe that women of a lower standing, that
is to say, the greater majority of the sex, are much more unhappy than they are in the East. Even Lord Byron says
(Letters and Papers, by Thomas Moore, vol. ii. p. 399), Thought of the state of women under the ancient Greeks
convenient enough. Present state, a remnant of the barbarism of the chivalric and feudal agesartificial and
unnatural. They ought to mind homeand be well fed and clothedbut not mixed in society. Well educated, too, in
religionbut to read neither poetry nor politicsnothing but books of piety and cookery. Musicdrawing
dancingalso a little gardening and ploughing now and then. I have seen them mending the roads in Epirus with
good success. Why not, as well as hay-making and milking?

The Book
87
Public Information
In our part of the world, where monogamy is in force, to marry means to halve ones rights and to double ones
duties. When the laws granted woman the same rights as man, they should also have given her a masculine power
of reason. On the contrary, just as the privileges and honours which the laws decree to women surpass what
Nature has meted out to them, so is there a proportional decrease in the number of women who really share these
privileges; therefore the remainder are deprived of their natural rights in so far as the others have been given more
than Nature accords.
For the unnatural position of privilege which the institution of monogamy, and the laws of marriage which
accompany it, assign to the woman, whereby she is regarded throughout as a full equivalent of the man, which she
is not by any means, cause intelligent and prudent men to reflect a great deal before they make so great a sacrifice
and consent to so unfair an arrangement. Therefore, whilst among polygamous nations every woman finds
maintenance, where monogamy exists the number of married women is limited, and a countless number of women
who are without support remain over; those in the upper classes vegetate as useless old maids, those in the lower
are reduced to very hard work of a distasteful nature, or become prostitutes, and lead a life which is as joyless as it
is void of honour. But under such circumstances they become a necessity to the masculine sex; so that their
position is openly recognised as a special means for protecting from seduction those other women favoured by fate
either to have found husbands, or who hope to find them. In London alone there are 80,000 prostitutes. Then what
are these women who have come too quickly to this most terrible end but human sacrifices on the altar of
monogamy?
The women here referred to and who are placed in this wretched position are the inevitable counterbalance to the
European lady, with her pretensions and arrogance. Hence polygamy is a real benefit to the female sex, taking it as
a whole. And, on the other hand, there is no reason why a man whose wife suffers from chronic illness, or remains
barren, or has gradually become too old for him, should not take a second. Many people become converts to
Mormonism for the precise reasons that they condemn the unnatural institution of monogamy. The conferring of
unnatural rights upon women has imposed unnatural duties upon them, the violation of which, however, makes
them unhappy.
For example, many a man thinks marriage unadvisable as far as his social standing and monetary position are
concerned, unless he contracts a brilliant match. He will then wish to win a woman of his own choice under different
conditions, namely, under those which will render safe her future and that of her children. Be the conditions ever so
just, reasonable, and adequate, and she consents by giving up those undue privileges which marriage, as the basis
of civil society, alone can bestow, she must to a certain extent lose her honour and lead a life of loneliness; since
human nature makes us dependent on the opinion of others in a way that is completely out of proportion to its
value. While, if the woman does not consent, she runs the risk of being compelled to marry a man she dislikes, or
of shrivelling up into an old maid; for the time allotted to her to find a home is very short.
In view of this side of the institution of monogamy, Thomasiuss profoundly learned treatise, de Concubinatu, is well
worth reading, for it shows that, among all nations, and in all ages, down to the Lutheran Reformation, concubinage
was allowed, nay, that it was an institution, in a certain measure even recognised by law and associated with no
dishonour. And it held this position until the Lutheran Reformation, when it was recognised as another means for
justifying the marriage of the clergy; whereupon the Catholic party did not dare to remain behindhand in the matter.
It is useless to argue about polygamy, it must be taken as a fact existing everywhere, the mere regulation of which
is the problem to be solved. Where are there, then, any real monogamists? We all live, at any rate for a time, and
the majority of us always, in polygamy. Consequently, as each man needs many women, nothing is more just than
to let him, nay, make it incumbent upon him to provide for many women. By this means woman will be brought
back to her proper and natural place as a subordinate being, and the lady, that monster of European civilisation
and ChristianTeutonic stupidity, with her ridiculous claim to respect and veneration, will no longer exist; there will
still be women, but no unhappy women, of whom Europe is at present full. The Mormons standpoint is right.

The Book
88
Public Information
In India no woman is ever independent, but each one stands under the control of her father or her husband, or
brother or son, in accordance with the law of Manu.
It is certainly a revolting idea that widows should sacrifice themselves on their husbands dead body; but it is also
revolting that the money which the husband has earned by working diligently for all his life, in the hope that he was
working for his children, should be wasted on her paramours. Medium tenuere beati. The first love of a mother, as
that of animals and men, is purely instinctive, and consequently ceases when the child is no longer physically
helpless. After that, the first love should be reinstated by a love based on habit and reason; but this often does not
appear, especially where the mother has not loved the father. The love of a father for his children is of a different
nature and more sincere; it is founded on a recognition of his own inner self in the child, and is therefore
metaphysical in its origin.
In almost every nation, both of the new and old world, and even among the Hottentots, property is inherited by the
male descendants alone; it is only in Europe that one has departed from this. That the property which men have
with difficulty acquired by long-continued struggling and hard work should afterwards come into the hands of
women, who, in their want of reason, either squander it within a short time or otherwise waste it, is an injustice as
great as it is common, and it should be prevented by limiting the right of women to inherit. It seems to me that it
would be a better arrangement if women, be they widows or daughters, only inherited the money for life secured by
mortgage, but not the property itself or the capital, unless there lacked male descendants. It is men who make the
money, and not women; therefore women are neither justified in having unconditional possession of it nor capable
of administrating it. Women should never have the free disposition of wealth, strictly so-called, which they may
inherit, such as capital, houses, and estates. They need a guardian always; therefore they should not have the
guardianship of their children under any circumstances whatever.
The vanity of women, even if it should not be greater than that of men, has this evil in it, that it is directed on
material thingsthat is to say, on their personal beauty and then on tinsel, pomp, and show. This is why they are in
their right element in society. This it is which makes them inclined to be extravagant, especially since they possess
little reasoning power. Accordingly, an ancient writer says, [Greek: Gunae to synolon esti dapanaeron
physei].10 Mens vanity, on the other hand, is often directed on non-material advantages, such as intellect, learning,
courage, and the like.
11
Aristotle explains in the Politics the great disadvantages which the Spartans brought upon themselves by granting
too much to their women, by allowing them the right of inheritance and dowry, and a great amount of freedom; and
how this contributed greatly to the fall of Sparta. May it not be that the influence of women in France, which has
been increasing since Louis XIII.s time, was to blame for that gradual corruption of the court and government
which led to the first Revolution, of which all subsequent disturbances have been the result?
In any case, the false position of the female sex, so conspicuously exposed by the existence of the lady, is a
fundamental defect in our social condition, and this defect, proceeding from the very heart of it, must extend its
harmful influence in every direction. That woman is by nature intended to obey is shown by the fact that every
woman who is placed in the unnatural position of absolute independence at once attaches herself to some kind of
man, by whom she is controlled and governed; this is because she requires a master. If she, is young, the man is a
lover; if she is old, a priest.

The Book
89
Public Information
28.
APPENDIX B OH WHAT A BASTARD I AM
Gentlemen. Women hurl abuse at me all the time. Its so standard now that it has just become noise like the traffic
going past. Not worth taking any notice of. But there is something that I would like to draw your attention to.
In May 2007 I asked Jennifer, as my then wife, who had told me she was indifferent to being married to me in
February 2007, to take a class that had helped her twice before. It was called The Landmark Forum. I, as usual,
paid for the flights, accommodation etc since I was the only one working.
I asked her to attend the Landmark Forum again with a view of generating a breakthrough in her relationship with
me. She wrote the following letter to me. I have copied it exactly as written, spelling mistakes and all. My
comments are below the full version of the letter.
You men should take a close look at this. I have HUNDREDS of love letters from Jennifer professing her undying
love. Sure. Undying until committing perjury in her court submissions, stealing money, kidnapping my children.
THAT kind of undying love I can do without thank you very much.
You men want to take real close notice that NO OTHER WOMEN condemn this sort of behaviour. NONE OF
THEM. And once you figure THAT out then you will realise just how little women think of men now. You are nothing
but slaves to be used. You would do well not to forget that.
Many women have said to me I would like to see your exs side of the story. So I give them this and then I tell
them that for bad they can make up anything they like because Jennifer accused me of adultery, domestic
violence, abandoning my children and being an all round bad father.
I tell women make up your worst and assume she said it but note that she is also a liar or epic proportions. After
all. A woman who sends a note like this and then claims the man is a bad husband inside 6 months? What sort of
credibility do such claims have? None at all.
So. Here it is for your reading pleasure. This is just two months before she was talking to a divorce lawyer and
three months before stealing EUR18,000 from our company and 6 months before submitting allegations I was a
bad father and husband who has abandoned his family.
Read this young man. You will learn something. You will learn that your wife professing undying love for you lasts
until she calls her lawyer. And if you dont learn that lesson from me? They you deserve to learn it from a greedy,
vindictive, cruel and callous wife.
Oh how I must have been such a bastard. ;-)

The Book
90
Public Information
Dearest Peter,
As you know I came to the forum to have a breakthrough in my relationship
with you. As people have gotten up to speak I have seen aspects of my way of
being reflected in their stories. As I listened the possibility has dawned
on me that while I have complained of being bullied by you I have actually
been the bully. I have been so stubborn as to make our marriage unworkable.
I have resisted nearly everything you suggested, all to show you that you
are not the boss of me. I guess after all these years and divorce on the
table it should be pretty clear to both of us that that's the case.
The possibility I have invented for myself and my life is the possibility of
head over heels love, passionate, compassionate, generous and unstoppable. I
have also taken on the possibility of abundance. Years ago you asked me to
create a relationship and invite you to be enrolled in it. Last night I
finally did that. I don't blame you for being cynical about that invitation.
A less persistant man would have divorced me years ago.
You are the Samson that holds up the roof of the wortld over me and our
family. I have been Delialh pretending to love you while undermining your
strength. I am so sorry for that. I realise that for us to have the
relationship of my possibility I will have to give up making you wrong. I am
committed to having this possibility in my life. I will have head-over-heels
love with someone and you are my first choice.
I know you feel the relationship with our children is secondary and I have
always made you wrong for that. I want our relationship to be complete
freeing you to be a father to them. Will you be their father? No amount of
mother love can compensate them for the loss of you. I am also standing in
the possibility of our children attending the teen forum. I see how I have
enrolled them in my stories about you to their detriment. I want them to
have the loving relationship with you I know is possible.
Now I have created a possibility for my life do you think it is one I might
enroll you in? I invite you to share a life with me more wonderful than we
could ever have apart.
My offer to you is nothing less than myself, utterly, totally and
completely,
With all my love Jenni

The Book
91
Public Information
My comments about this letter are as follows:

As I listened the possibility has dawned
on me that while I have complained of being bullied by you I have actually
been the bully. I have been so stubborn as to make our marriage unworkable.
Yes. In our household, the bully was Jennifer. Every step of the way. She bullied me, she bullied the children, she
bullied her parents. She bullied everyone. In many cases oh so nicely so as the person might not notice it, but
Jennifer has been nothing but a bully all her married life. She complained of being bullied at school. I now do not
believe that story one little bit. Perhaps some of the other girls pushed back. That would be more believable.
A less persistant man would have divorced me years ago.
Yes. I loved Jennifer with all my heart and soul and I prayed she would regain her faith and be the wife she vowed
to be on her wedding day. Even my Family Law Solicitor in Sydney (female) told me I was stupid not to divorce this
woman years previously. Apparently loving your wife and begging her to be a decent human being and standing
loyally by her despite her abuse to give her every chance to take up her religion again and be a decent human
being is called stupid in our society by women. You men should NOT forget this.
You are the Samson that holds up the roof of the wortld over me and our
family. I have been Delialh pretending to love you while undermining your
strength. I am so sorry for that.
Notice that Jennifer admits to undermining my strength. Basically, all that I tried to do and contribute to my family
was undermined by Jennifer while she, in her own words pretended to love me.
Jennifer is sorry. Really? When she betrayed me within a few months? You can make up your own mind if that is
the action of a sorry person.
I know you feel the relationship with our children is secondary and I have
always made you wrong for that. I want our relationship to be complete
freeing you to be a father to them.
Yet inside 6 months she is alleging I am an unfit father who has abandoned them and is demanding sole custody
and sole discretion of access to my former children. That sure sounds like freeing to me.
I could not make this shit up.
No amount of mother love can compensate them for the loss of you.
Yet inside 6 months she is denying me access to my former children in an effort to line her own pockets with money
she has stolen from the family through blatantly lying to me. Ok. That sounds like good mothering to me. NOT!
My offer to you is nothing less than myself, utterly, totally and
Completely
Sounds like a great offer. But she neglects to mention that she retains the right to be dishonest and demands the
ability to steal money from the family finances. Her offer was turned down on the basis that if she was offering
herself she needed to get a job and help. Which she refused to do.
As you can see from this letter Jennifers lies are laid bare. And yes, they really are that disgusting. However the
more important lesson for YOU young man is that virtually ALL OTHER WOMEN take the view that this kind of
attitude is PERFECTLY OK.
THAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT LESSON TO LEARN FROM THIS LETTER.

The Book
92
Public Information
29.
APPENDIX C - DOCUMENTS ON WEBSITE
One of the problems with writing a book like this is that there is so much information available that a normal human
being could not read it all in a year. Really. I read so much information to learn about the control grid that it was
really not funny. Most men do NOT have all the time needed to do such. As such, it is counter productive to put into
this book too much information that will lead men astray from the items that are most important for them to read.
However, I also acknowledge that SOME MEN will want to read such information and that it is useful for them to
have access to it quickly and easily from a single reference point like this. Further, many of the documents that I
have used I have placed onto my web site and created links for so that they are easily accessible.
I have included sets of links here with descriptions and links so that those who are interested can click on these
and go find some of the more interesting things on the web that they might like to read or watch.
Name
Video of Court Meeting
Description/Link
The most important item I have released is the video evidence of David Dunkley
committing crimes. All men should take a look at this video.
http://www.youtube.com/user/peternolan1109?feature=mhum
The full download of the video is here, all be it in a low quality format.
Transcript of the Court

Meeting
http://www.peternolan.com/LinkClick.aspx?link=CourtHearing01.wmv&tabid=53
8&mid=1229
As you watch the video it is recommended that you read the transcript of what is
being said. The words on the video can be hard to hear and the real purpose of
the video is to serve as evidence of the transcript. Keep an eye out for the
statement that talk of inalienable rights is a nonsense.
Court Order of 2010-02-19.
http://www.peternolan.com/LinkClick.aspx?link=PAC6601_2007+20091126Reis
sue+Final.pdf&tabid=538&mid=1230
David Dunkley was foolish enough to then go on and issue a Court Order and
this is it. Take a close look and you will see how he deceptively sent 95% of the
proceeds of my 25 years of labour to Jennifer.
Soft copy of Strawman

Reclaim Documents
Soft copy of Strawman

Reclaim Documents
Documents on Sovereignty
http://www.peternolan.com/LinkClick.aspx?link=PN_Order_NvN.pdf&tabid=538
&mid=1230
This is the anonymised initial set of strawman reclaim documents I put out onto
the web. They can be used as a starting point and templates for your strawman
recapture process.
http://www.peternolan.com/LinkClick.aspx?link=StrawmanReclaimDocs.zip&tabi
d=538&mid=1230
This is the anonymised initial set of strawman reclaim documents I put out onto
the web. They can be used as a starting point and templates for your strawman
recapture process.
http://www.peternolan.com/LinkClick.aspx?link=StrawmanReclaimDocs.zip&tabi
d=538&mid=1230
This is the forum entry for my Documents on Sovereignty. These are the
documents I used to perform my strawman recapture process.
You can download the scanned versions of each of these documents from here:
Documents related to Court

Cases in Ireland
The Book
http://www.peternolan.com/Forums/tabid/420/forumid/37/scope/threads/Default.
aspx
It gets a bit complicated because I had court cases running in both Ireland and
Australia. Some things pass over both sets of cases. Ive done my best to
organise these things but they can still be a little confusing. This link goes to the
93
Public Information
documents for my case in Ireland. It includes such things as Jennifers perjurous

court documents and Judge Griffins orders to close my bank accounts without
my consent and without good service of any documents on me.
Documents related to Court

Cases in Australia
aspx
And this is the list of documents I am releasing for the court case in Australia.
aspx
This set of documents exposes the criminals in the legal fraternity in Australia.
Documents exposing the

criminals in the legal fraternity
in Australia
aspx
Open Letters
I have created a number of open letters and some of them are worth reading.
You can find them here:
Other Forum Entries
Link Container to email links
aspx
I was going to link many other things in this table but I believe it is just best to
point the reader to my forums and the links in the forums. I will, as dilligently as
possible, place links into my forums and maintain those links there. I have
changed the forums to allow anonymous downloads so you can go to these
forums and download any materials placed there as well as link to other peoples
work.
http://www.peternolan.com/Forums/tabid/420/Default.aspx
On of the things I wanted to be able to do was to email links to single
documents. It is not possible to do this with the download document feature so
I created a link container to email links. It is the bottom container on this page.
If you want to email to someone a specific link to a specific document you can
go into this container, select the document you want to email the link to, and
right click on the link to obtain the full http address to mail the link for just that
document. I have found this very useful for things like emails and forum entries.
Crimes Against Fathers

Website
http://www.peternolan.com/Divorce/ScannedDocuments/tabid/538/Default.aspx
www.crimesagainstfathers.com
This is a global site that will be used to prosecute those whom fathers accuse of
a crime on an Affidavit under penalty of perjury and full commercial liability.
We are creating portals for each country and perhaps state in the US under the
parent site.
It is also the major mechanism we will use to disseminate information about
crimes against fathers.

The Book
94
Public Information
30.
APPENDIX D - ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Every book like this has to have an about the author. It is that little bit of text that establishes some level of
credibility to answer questions such as:
Why should I listen to this guy?
Does he know what he is talking about?
Can I really learn anything from him?
I will go through all this in this section. Those who know me know how I am. All the documents I talk about have
gone to various so called world leaders using my real calling. I am not hard to find if someone really wants to find
me, and quite a few have.
In the early 90s I was somewhat famous in my area of speciality. I didnt really like it. I would prefer to not be
famous or well known outside of my specific business interests. I am just a guy who was intended to be one
more piece of divorce court road kill and they couldnt defeat me so they had to steal all my money off me. Well?
Im going to take all the property of two magistrates and one judge. The three who committed crimes against me.
So, as we say in Australia: Gday. Some brief facts about me are:
I was born in 1964 so at the time of writing this book I am 46.
I was raised of loving caring parents who taught me the value of family.
I was raised in a small country town in Australia called Wagga Wagga.
I had a great childhood, no bad experiences, no skeletons in the closet.
When I was little my Dad used to say to me Son, when you grow up, if you are really lucky, you will marry
a woman like your mother. I believed him. I just didnt get lucky.
When I was 12 I discovered girls.and knew that I liked them.
I was what I considered unsuccessful with girlsfor some reason I could not get the ones I liked to like
me back when I was 12. I didnt realise most boys have the same problem at that age.
When I was 14 I had my first girlfriend, for 6 weeks, and I was heartbroken when she told me she did not
want to be my girlfriend any more. We remained great friends for 32 years before I dropped her as a friend.
In my words I dropped he because I realised that she was not a friend, and never was, and that
maintaining that friendship was worthless to me. Her reply was telling. It included:
You are the only person who has wished me happy birthday all these last 32 years. Not even my mother
has remembered in time every time. And Have a good life.
A lot of young men I tell that to are shocked. Have a good life? After 32 years of steadfast friendship
during which time we had both cried on each others shoulders many times over as we lived our lives?
Stories like that really shake up the young men.
When I was 16 I had my second girlfriend. And that lasted 18 months and was a wonderful growing
experience. I messed up that relationship by being too chickenshit to deal with the issue that I planned to
move away from my hometown to go to university. I apologised many years later and the wonderful woman
was generous enough to forgive me my lack of courage and maturity. After all, I was just 17 and most 17
year old boys lack courage and maturity in their relationships with girls.
When I was 20 I re-met the girl who was to become my wife. She was a family friend. Her little brother and
I were best mates at school. She was actually the best friend of my first girlfriend and so I knew her from
when I was 12. I had been in and out of their house from the time I was 12. Her name is Jennifer.

The Book
95
Public Information
Jennifer and I started out on the date that never was on the evening of Wimbledon Ladies Final in 1984.
So it was always easy for us to remember which day marked our anniversary of being together.
We were together for 5 years before getting married.
We were married for 18 years.
Jennifer had two children from her first marriage. I raised them as my own but always made sure they
honoured their real father. An early decision was they were to use my first name.
We had two children of our own born in 1991 (Josephine) and 1993 (Joshua).
I completed my degree and was lucky enough to get a great job at IBM. I worked there for 8.5 years before
starting my own company. I ran that for 2 years before being made an offer too good to refuse to move
back into the corporate world. By 2000 I had enough of the corporate world again and relocated to Ireland
to contract in a team with an old mate of mine.
From February 2001 to the date of print I have worked based out of Ireland doing Consulting work in my
area of specialisation. I am one of the top people in the world in the area of Business Intelligence. There
will be plenty of western women try and destroy my business out of hatred for men like me. You know,
honest men who are prepared to put their thoughts into print. Western women HATE men like me with a
passion.
Any woman who makes knowingly false claims against me will be accused of slander and I will have a jury
issue a Remedy Instruction. So ladies? You should not even be reading this, but if you slander me? I will
find you and I will take your property off you.
I have made good money for my age from the time I was 22. In later years I have done very well in terms of
earning revenue because of my high level of skills.
I was faithful to Jennifer throughout my 23 years though I had plenty of opportunity to have sex with any
number of women. I travelled extensively for work and was made MANY offers. I was very surprised
women do not value faithfulness. I now tell young men dont bother being faithful as it will not be rewarded.
If women wanted faithful husbands they should have rewarded a man like me rather than to punish me for
my wifes crimes.
I never once lied to Jennifer in our 23 years together. (Not many men can say that.)
I was even more surprised that honesty is not rewarded in a marriage. Indeed, dis-honesty by a woman is
abundantly rewarded and supported by other women.
I dont do drugs, I am not a drunk though I do like the odd drink. I rarely smoked cigarettes and never,
every had so much as a cigarette in sight of my children.
I used to be Christian until I realised it was part of the Illuminati control grid.
I am very widely travelled. I have worked on 5 continents and in at least 20 countries for something like
200+ companies. Some of those companies you know the names of as they are household names in
Europe and Australia. Some of my clients have been global household names. I really must count them all
some time.
When my grandmothers died I was the grandchild who was asked by my peers, my cousins, to perform the
Eulogies at BOTH the grandmothers funerals. I was told that this honour had previously gone to the eldest
grand child but it was decided to have a vote on this in my generation and I was, apparently, asked to
perform this honour. Those two speeches live in my memory as the greatest honours of my life.
I add that to let the read know. I am the sort of man my FEMALE cousins asked to eulogise their
grandmother. I am held in high regard across my family, though some of the women are not happy with
what I am now saying. Bad luck them. If they can find anything I say that is false they are welcome to rebut
my facts, evidence and well based opinion based on those facts and evidence. Im still waiting.

The Book
96
Public Information
In divorce I was treated terribly. Really terribly. My personal and company bank accounts were frozen even
before any documents were served on me. This meant I was impoverished and needed to borrow money to
defend myself from the perjury of false allegations being made against me by someone who swore for
many years she loved me who had also sworn to our children she would settle amicably.
My former children were kidnapped as in relocated to places unknown and I was refused even a phone
number.
The thing that pissed me off the most was this. My mother was falling into dementia and in February 08 I
went to my home town to spend my last time with her in a lucid state. Jennifer, in attempting to extort
money from me, refused to give my father a phone number for his wife of 49 years to call her beloved
grandchildren on his word of honour this phone number would not be given to me.
I was forced to sit in front of my elderly and ill mother, while she knew full well she had only a
month or two of lucidity left, and watch her cry as she begged me to get a phone number to talk to
her grand daughter.
You men would be well advised to take note of what I just wrote. A woman was prepared to abuse an ill
and elderly woman by withholding contact from her grand-daughter in order to extort money from the father
and son.
I talked to Jennifers father, Bill Toal, and demanded he take this issue to Jennifers mother, Irene, and tell
her in no uncertain terms that this was one of the most disgusting and repulsive acts of abuse I had ever
seen in my life. I demanded a phone number or this act would be widely broadcast in our town. Jennifers
mother, also a grandmother many times over, refused to rebuke her daughter and I was left with no result.
I talked to many other women demanding they call Jennifer and demand that she stop the abuse of my
mother. You men want to listen up REAL CLOSE. Guess what? NOT ONE WOMAN ACTED. Ok? Have
you GOT THAT? Every woman I talked to said No. She would not stand up to such bully tactics and such
abuse from Jennifer. Guess what? You might be next..
I was the admins of Jennifers largest social group and I obviously had the email list for that social group.
This was the International Womens Club of Dublin. It was filled with women whos husbands came from
somewhere else to work in Dublin like I had done. These women were the richest and most privileged
women you could meet.
So I wrote one of the most scathing letters I ever wrote and I told those women in no uncertain terms just
how disgusted I was with each and every one of them that they would allow such abuse of an ill and elderly
woman. One who was in the age group of many of the women in that social group. I told them I was
thorough, thoroughly, thoroughly disgusted that they would allow such behaviour of one of their members
and that if that is what women in this club were like they were beneath my contempt.
Eventually my father was given a number to call and my mother was able to talk to her grand children
before slipping into incoherency. But that I had to roundly denounce more than 200 women as utterly
disgusting and beneath my contempt to get it should tell you men reading this just how disgusting western
women have become.
You men would be well advised to ask yourself: How can more than two hundred women agree with
abuse of an elderly and ill woman in order to extort money from a man who has done no wrong? Go
ahead. Ask yourself that question. See what you come up with. Talk about it with your mates. Ask them
what they come up with too.
As time went on and I learned that the courts were nothing but a satanic cult that are part of the nazi
totalitarian communist guvment control grid I fired my lawyers and started acting on my own.
In Ireland the so called outstanding interim support was EUR150,000. I sent Judge Griffin a lawful Bill for
his Order of EUR1.5M. I have never heard another peep about that so called interim support and therefore
I have proven that any man can deny an court order of the family court by using conditional acceptance
and issuing a bill for the fulfilment of the order.

The Book
97
Public Information
In Australia I walked into the satanic criminal just-us system to deal with the scumbag self confessed
criminal calling himself David Dunkley on 2009-11-26. The full transcript is here:
http://www.peternolan.com/LinkClick.aspx?link=PAC6601_2007+20091126Reissue+Final.pdf&tabid=538&
mid=1230
I video recorded the meeting. It is on my you-tube channel here:
http://www.youtube.com/user/peternolan1109
I proved, and collected the evidence, that the Australian Federal Magistrates Court is nothing but a bunch
of scumbag criminals masquerading as magistrates. They are private employees of a private company
called The Commonwealth of Australia and they are scumbag criminals.
I have David Dunkley, on video and in a transcript saying talk of inalienable rights is a nonsense. He
means YOUR right to life, liberty and the enjoyment of your property. It does not get any clearer than that.
While sitting on the bench David Dunkley refused to answer the question as to whether he was acting
under oath TWICE. That tells you he was not. The video footage was sent to Kevin Rudd (Australian Prime
Minister) and Robert McClelland (Australian Attorney General) and they were given 6 months to act against
the scumbag self confessed criminal David Dunkley and they did nothing.
I sincerely believe this is treason as David Dunkley is acting as a senior officer of a foreign power, the
British, and Rudd/McClelland did not deal with this treason therefore committing treason themselves. They
were required to act according to the statues of The Commonwealth of Australia as well as according to
common law which is the prevailing law in the land known as Australia.
So. I created and presented the evidence of the corruption of the courts to the Prime Minister and the
Attorney General and they did nothing thereby committing a crime themselves. You men want to take
REAL CLOSE notice of those facts.
Further, the criminal scumbag calling himself David Dunkley took exception to me gathering this evidence
and so contrived a deceptive order to transfer 95% of the entire proceeds of my 25 years of labour to
Jennifer. The scumbag tried to get my signature on a form giving me EUR12,000 of my own money. I told
him to basically go f*** himself and that he had all the paperwork for my claim to the entire amount and
since he had offered no rebuttal in the time frame required that any attempt to send any of my property
anywhere else would constitute common law theft for which he would be charged.
You can read this deceptive order here and my annotations on that order:
http://www.peternolan.com/LinkClick.aspx?link=PN_Order_NvN.pdf&tabid=538&mid=1230
The deceptive and unlawful order was acted on by another criminal scumbag called Justin Dowd who
works at Watts McCray in Sydney as a family law lawyer. At the time of writing I still need to deal with this
criminal scumbag. But to tell you, dear reader, what sort of scumbag this man is? I presented him with
evidence of the ongoing genocide in Australia and asked him if he would be patriot and help me expose the
genocide.
HE CHARGED ME $A3,000 TO READ MY EVIDENCE OF GENOCIDE and then said he would do nothing
about it. THAT is the sort of scumbag Justin Dowd is. He will be charged with accessory to genocide when
I get around to him.
The final wash up was that 95% of the proceeds of my 25 years of labour was transferred to Jennifer. Now,
you men? Listen REAL CLOSE. How many women do you think protested that 5% vs 95% was clearly
unlawful and must be addressed? Yes. You guessed it. NONE.
Ask yourself the question: What does it mean when NO WOMAN will protest a 5% vs 95% split of
assets when all those who are close to the situation know full well the woman was bone idle and
refused to make her best efforts for more than 10 years of an 18 year marriage?
Go ahead. Ask yourself that question and see what you come up with.
If you think women want Equality? I have a bridge to sell you. Ok?

The Book
98
Public Information
Here is something else you men will want to know about. Jennifer committed the common law crimes, on
the land common known as Ireland, of perjury, kidnapping, extortion and theft. I joined the Irish Free Man
Group and I was interviewed by the host, Vince, and I presented my story. I did this in an effort to educate
and expose the Illuminati control grid.
In the interview Vince noted I had upset some of the women by my statements about western women. He
noted that there were many good women who were subscribers to the site. One of the things I undertook
to do was to challenge the women on the site to live up to their claims of wanting equality and common
law to be practiced in Ireland.
The challenge to the women was simple. My ex had committed crimes. I asked for the women on the site
to form a jury such that I could present my evidence to the jury and for the jury to deliberate and pronounce
a punishment since my ex had accepted she had committed these crimes. I stated that the only thing I
would claim is that whatever punishment was given my ex that no MAN could be more harshly punished for
committing the same crimes.
Now? How many women do you think volunteered to serve on this jury? THREE. And one of them
reported to me that when talking to other women about how this was only right and fair the OTHER
WOMEN attacked her as supporting Peter where what they were really supporting was the rule of law.
You men here might want to ask yourself the question: Why is it, that given 5.5 months, the women of the
Irish Free Man Group (of which there were at least 200 at the time) flatly refused to form a jury to try a
woman for crimes committed against a man?
You would do well to think about that question for a while and see what you come up with. Ask yourself .
Does this sound like women want to be equal before the law to you? Well? Does it?
Continuing on. I have found scumbag criminal calling herself Louise Henderson, also calling herself
Australian Federal Magistrate Louise Henderson operating her criminal activities out the of Federal
Magistrates Court in Parramatta Sydney guilty of common law theft. Ditto for scumbag criminal David
Dunkley. I am working on forming juries to have the remedy issued.
I will also be holding a court for scumbag criminal Judge Griffin of the satanic criminal just-us system
acting as a Family Court in Dublin on the land known as Ireland.
Lastly, but certainly not leastly, I will be running a court for my ex before 12 men who will pronounce a
remedy that will set the standard for MEN AND WOMEN for the crimes of perjury, kidnapping, extortion
and theft committed on the land known as Ireland. I care not what the remedy is. I only care that no man
suffer harsher remedy than Jennifer. The men will be faced with the decision. Do we offer no remedy and
therefore de-criminalise perjury, kidnapping, extortion and theft or do they issue a remedy such that these
crimes are still considered crimes? It will be an interesting trial.

The Book
99
Public Information
You men reading this book? You want to be really, really, really clear. In divorce you are very, very, very likely to be
f***ed over like I was. In mens groups we are starting to see some men point out that if the ex has a fatal accident
then the man has a FAR better chance at a good life than if he tried to go into the satanic criminal just-us system
also calling itself The Family Court. And you men would do well to remember this.
So, my summary is that I am a pretty normal guy who has done his best for his family for a long, long time. I have
plenty of experience of being married. I spent a lot of time working on relationships.
So why am I writing this book?
Well, because, despite my doing all I could, my very best, when my wife and I got divorced she did things I would
have thought were impossible to do. I was legally abused at the same time as crimes were committed against my
interests causing injury, harm and loss.
And that was very disappointing to me.
But what was MORE disappointing was the lack of a view of broader responsibility by women to stop Jennifer from
doing what she was doing.
I had married into a family and I assumed that should I ever have trouble with my wife I could always go to her
parents and ask for help to have her behave reasonably. Much to his credit, her father was great and he did his
best to help, as did our eldest son of 26. But that was only early on. Both Bill Toal and Jarrod Robinson then
committed crimes by engaging in Jennifers crimes against me. Both will be accused of these crimes and have their
property taken off them.
Jennifer was adamant that she was unwilling to listen to her father and adult son. Only 2 other women tried to
persuade Jennifer that I had done nothing wrong, indeed I had done all I could, and that it was not reasonable to
take him for all you can get at the end.
So, this book is about this situation in which men find themselves and how to get out of it legally and lawfully.
Young man? No matter how great a husband you are. No matter what you do. When your wife leaves, as is almost
inevitable nowadays, she is very likely going to take you for all you can get. You cannot do enough for her to be
reasonable. The likelihood that she will be reasonable is so low as to be insignificant.
Shakespeare was right Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. And this is true even if the woman initiated the
divorce.
So this book is about arming you with advice:
1. Such that you do not land in my position, which I will describe in these pages.
2. On how to notice when you are being worked over to get you to commit to getting married and having kids
with the woman who says she loves you.
3. How to divorce your wife, state, rescind your consent to pay income taxes, alimony, child support, and to
walk away free.
4. How to unplug from THEIR control grid.
5. How to claim your birthright of freedom, claim your rights, exercise them, and defend them.
That is enough of introductions and background. Lets get into the meat of this book.

The Book
100
Public Information
31.
APPENDIX E A FINAL WORD
Young man. You might be wondering to yourself.
Why has Peter put so much of his personal life out there to be read?
Why has he been so willing to suffer the outrageous slings and arrows of so many vindictive women telling
lies about him, trying to ruin his business, trying to ruin his life?
Why has he spent so much time and money on other people when he could so clearly just go back to
writing and selling software and living a very comfortable life?
What are his reasons for doing this?
Let me answer that by an email I received from a young man. This is a fine young lad of about 22 years of age.
Hes even a pretty good looking young lad. Hes in the tall dark and handsome category. Yes. Hes sent me some
pics so I could put a face to the name.
Here is what he said to me.
Just want to take a moment to say thank you for all your dedication to this cause and to saving men's lives.
Based on your actions I can tell you actually have a heart and are genuinely looking out for the well-being of young
men such as myself. In particular I have found your information regarding women to be VERY enlightening, this
same crucial and vital information about women for young men is so ruthlessly suppressed by the media.
I can now clearly see who my friends are and who they are not. To give you an example, a few weeks back my
aunt (mid-50's) came to visit me. While she was here she kept going on and on about "You're so tall my baby, we
need to get you married" and "When you get out of school the girls are gonna love you, we need to find you a good
girl who knows how to cook".
Now, had I still been in the dark about women I would've thought what she said was a good idea and mostly
benign, but now that I know the truth, I can CLEARLY see she does not have my best interests in mind, she is
merely trying to get "babies" in the form of grandchildren so SHE can talk and brag about with her female friends.
In another incident recently at work, an new woman (mid-30's) who just started was chatting up people during lunch
and she asked me "You're pretty tall, are you married? You need a girlfriend ".
You were 100% right!!! They're ALL in on the marriage scam!!! It's CRAZY to see this stuff proven to be true in real
life scenarios!
Keep doing what you're doing man, DONT EVER STOP
And you know what? I am never going to stop. Someone has to look out for these young lads being so badly lied to
and it might as well be me. There are many other men also telling you young lads how badly lied to you are. You
can find a bunch of them here www.the-spearhead.com. I recommend that site to every young man who would like
to read about how badly men are abused and how much crime is committed against them with impunity. There are
plenty of men sharing their stories there. I also recommend www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/forums because on
this site men speak much more openly. And there are plenty of guys there who will tell young men just exactly how
life is. There is also a vast array of cases recorded in the forums over the many years they have been running.
When I first came out of my period of being suicidal I made a vow to save one mans life. I felt that if I could save
one mans life that I could then get on with my life feeling that I had done some good for some young lad and that
he would not be victimized like I was. Only trouble was I achieved this in a few weeks after joining Men are Better
Than Women. On telling my story there I was immediately met with MANY emails from young men thanking me for
sharing my experiences. Many knew something was up but they didnt know what. Once I told them the what
they got it. I am pleased to say I counseled a number of young men there to end their engagements and refuse to
marry their fiance.
Every single one of them thanked me for that as I was able to put into perspective the behaviours they were seeing
from their fiances.

The Book
101
Public Information
Young men have been the cannon fodder for the tribe since the time of the woolly mammoth. This is why I
included the Woolly Mammoth story. Young men read that and it really resonates with them. They can see that
from the time of the Woolly Mammoth until today men have been expendable slaves in war and work.
I recall telling the Woolly Mammoth story to Sue 3. At the end she gave me this really fierce look and said:
Sue 3: You are so cynical
Peter: Yes. But in this case I also happen to be correct.
And at that her expression broke and she look quite forlorn and sad. She knew she was the one who was looking
for a brainwashed man who would be willing to sacrifice his life for her and that she would never, ever love him like
he would her. In that instant, she really got what it was to be a man who loved a woman and realized that she
would never feel a similar way. I told her that I didnt really know if it was good for her in all cases to be spending
time with me because the life lessons I might share might be a little too much a little too soon for her.
I tell the young men, and young women, the Woolly Mammoth story to point out that to the young men that if you
are expected to dedicate your ENTIRE LIFE to a woman you had better make sure you are getting something
worthwhile in return. Today? There is nothing of value offered a man for this commitment. He can have his very
children stolen from him, along with his house and lifes work, JUST LIKE I DID, and women will LAUGH AT HIM,
just like they did me. When I tell the lads 5% is the new 50% they really get it.
And for the young women? I am warning them that if they do not offer something of real value then many, many
more men are going to refuse the joke that is called commitment now. There is no commitment at all from a
woman. Another conversation with Sue 3?
Sue 3: But the problem for us women is that after 2-3 years with a man he can put us women out on the street with
only our suitcases. He does not have to make a commitment. And then we have to start searching for a new man to
be our husband all over again!
Peter: Oh? Really? And this would be somehow worse than it is for us men? We can have our children kidnapped,
our houses stolen, our money stolen AND our future income stolen. We can be put in jail for talking to our own kids.
We dont even get the suitcases with our cloths in it and set out on the street. You mean you might feel as hard
done by as us MEN?
To that comment she just hung her head. So I drilled it home.
Peter: For 30 years in the west women have stolen everything of value from so many men, and all the other
women stood by and laughed at us. If you want to know who to blame for how hard it is to find a husband now look
no further than all those women who supported women like my wife. All those women who laughed at men like me.
There are millions of men like me. And we are telling every young man we meet to refuse to marry and refuse to
have children. If I were you? Id be throwing stones at my ex and women like her. They are the cause of your
problems.
To that comment she just hung her head some more. She really wants to find a husband and she can see how
hard it is going to be with so many older men like me telling the younger men:
Do not marry under ANY circumstances until we sort this mess out.
The only way women are going to have ANYTHING of value to offer is for them to sign one of the two Affidavits that
I proposed. And to follow up on from those Affidavits? Women will have to insist that those women who claim
lawful equality will have to ensure that women who break their agreement and violate their oaths actually have the
bond given to the man they violated the oath to.
Only then will women start to restore some of the credibility they have so gleefully thrown away.
So yes. I will keep going, telling young men how it really is via books, podcasts, and videos.
The young men have a right to know.

The Book
102
Public Information
This page is intentionally left blank

The Book
103
Public Information

Living Free in A Fem-Nazi World V0.03

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Living Free in A Fem-Nazi World V0.03

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Living Free in a Fem-Nazi World

CHANGE CONTROL LOG ................................................................................................... 4

LAWFUL NOTICE TO THOSE WHO WOULD SLANDER ME ............................................. 5

WHY SAY THAT THE WEST IS A FEM-NAZI WORLD ..................................................... 6

A FOR WORD AND WARNING.......................................................................................... 10

SUBJECTS COVERED IN THIS BOOK ............................................................................. 15

HOW ARE MEN ENSLAVED? ........................................................................................... 16

WHAT IS THE SOLUTION? ............................................................................................... 18

HOW DO I CLAIM MY RIGHTS? .................................................................................... 20

THE DEFAULT JUDGEMENT ........................................................................................ 26

Certificate of Sovereignty .................................................................................................................32

STRAWMAN RECAPTURE COMPLETED? WHAT IS NEXT? ...................................... 35

A WORD ABOUT POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND KIDNAPPING............... 37

AFFIDAVIT OF LAWFUL EQUALITY FOR A WOMAN................................................... 45

AFFIDAVIT OF CHATTEL PROPERTY FOR A WOMAN TO A MAN............................. 49

AGREEMENT OF MARRIAGE BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN ............................. 52

THE ARBITRATION PANEL ........................................................................................... 60

A WORD ON PROSTITUTION ....................................................................................... 72

A WORD ON LAWYERS AND BARRISTERS ................................................................ 74

A WORD ON THE SEXISM AND GENDER POLITICS OF WOMEN ............................. 76

A WORD ON THE RULE OF LAW.................................................................................. 77

WHAT DO WOMEN NOT WANT? .................................................................................. 83

APPENDIX A - ON WOMEN.BY ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER ...................................... 84

APPENDIX B OH WHAT A BASTARD I AM ................................................................ 90

APPENDIX C - DOCUMENTS ON WEBSITE................................................................. 93

APPENDIX D - ABOUT THE AUTHOR........................................................................... 95

APPENDIX E A FINAL WORD................................................................................... 101