Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Jing He 07/20/2016
The focus of my research is on teaching students grammar in context.
Grammar is boring but still important for my students who have to meet the
requirements of standard English tests since most of them aim to study
abroad. Traditional ways of teaching grammar in China require students to
memorize the rules and do a large number of drills. Not so many students
can achieve a lot from this kind of teaching. I believe it will be more
engaging and efficient if we teach students grammar in various contexts.
With this focus in mind, I found and read the following articles.
1.
Mart, . T. (2013). Teaching grammar in context: Why and how? Theory and
Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 124-129. Retrieved from
http://proxying.lib.ncsu.edu/index.php?
url=http://search.proquest.com.prox.lib.ncsu.edu/docview/1346774369?
accountid=12725
As the title tells, the author elaborates his claims regarding why and how
the grammar should be taught in context. Before getting to the point, the
author emphasizes the importance of teaching grammar itself. He claims
that understanding the grammar is the key to understanding a foreign
language. By teaching students grammatical structures, we show students
how a language works and allow them to do effective communication. Then
the author begins to elaborate why we should teach grammar in context. He
criticizes the traditional way of teaching grammar and claims that the
biggest disadvantage is that students fail to apply the grammar they learn.
On the contrary, teaching grammar in context will show students directly
how the grammar works in real communication. Based on this argument, the
author then elaborates how we teach grammar in context. Dialogue is
claimed to be an effective way. The main method is to guide students to read
the dialogue and work out the grammatical rules by induction and then apply
them by themselves. The key point is to use high-frequency instances to help
students see the usage of grammar. The author concludes that teaching
grammar through context will help learners perceive the structures of the
language effectively and students will master the language better.
This source is useful in terms of its strong argument for the importance
of teaching grammar in context, that is, why we should teach students
grammar in context. However, it kind of fails to show how exactly we can
teach in context. Though the author gives two examples, he doesnt discuss
this part in a comprehensive and profound way.
My research aims to explore how we can teach grammar in context. This
source is helpful to support my rationale, but not so helpful in terms of
teaching and researching methods.
2.
Smoot, W. S. (2001). An experiment in teaching grammar in context. Voices from
the Middle, 8(3), 34-42. Retrieved from
http://proxying.lib.ncsu.edu/index.php?
url=http://search.proquest.com.prox.lib.ncsu.edu/docview/213932444?
accountid=12725
This article discusses the authors experiment of teaching grammar in
context. The author first explains why he was motivated to carry out this
experiment. He talked about the traditional way of teaching grammar
through memorization and drills in his school, and the fact that students
usually failed to apply grammar in real writing when they were taught in this
way. He aimed to teach students both little grammar (sentence structure,
parts of speech, etc.) and big grammar (essay structure, points of an
argument, etc.) through reading meaningful texts drawn from history class.
The main approach is to encourage students to discover grammatical rules in
the texts and then they can remember them and use them. The attempts
showed early success. However, as the experiment moved on, students
began to complain that they were falling behind in learning grammar
compared with other classes. The author received negative comments
regarding the effectiveness of the method. Whats worse, his students failed
in the assessments, which were taken by other classes. The author analyzes
the reasons behind the failure. He admits that a failure of communication
with his students about the new method and also his failure to collaborate
with the colleagues led to the failure of the experiment. He believes that he
should have considered the larger context of the teaching, that is the school
environment. He also claims that using traditional way of assessments to