Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Anthropology 1020
July 29 2016
The history of race starts with the ancient Egyptians classifying others
they met that looked different based on their skin. That basic classification
was as follows: red for Egyptian, yellow for those to the east, white for those
to the north, and black for those to the south (Jurmain, Kilgore and Trevathan
2013:311). In the 18th century Carl Linnaeus and John Ray standardized the
process by which all things are classified. This was and still is a great aid to
the scientific community, to have all things organized in such a specific way.
Linnaeus was so good at his job that he also classified humans, but in a very
specific way. He followed a similar pattern established by the Egyptians. The
classes were Homo sapiens americanus (Americans or Native Americans as
they are known today), Homo sapiens europaeus (Europeans), Homo sapiens
asiaticus (Asians), and Homo sapiens afer (Africans). To go further, Linnaeus
then added descriptions to each class. For example the Europeans were
muscular flowing blond hair very smart. All other generalized
descriptions were more negative such as Africans were lazy and flat nosed,
Americans were Ill-tempered and stubborn, and Asians were melancholy, and
greedy (Roberts 2011:29-30). These idealistic descriptions are thought to be
the ground work for present racism, and understandably so. Another name
associated with classification is Johann F. Blumenbach. He became known for
his classification because it didnt just separate humans, it also linked them
together. He believed that all humanity stated from a single race and then
came to differ from the original, an idea of adaptation rather than natural
selection. His ideal race was the Caucasians and all other races adapted to
their environment based on that ideal race (Wolpoff and Caspari 1997:62).
After Linnaeus and Blumenbach, the escalation of racism greatly increased.
Humanity took those ideals that Linnaeus and Blumenbach brought forth and
took them to mean that the ideal is superior and must dominate the rest.
The idea of eugenics, meaning a science that tries to improve the human
race by controlling which people become parents (Merriam-Webster
Dictionary Online). In the mid 1800s, Joseph-Authur Comte de Gobineau a
French aristocrat and diplomat wrote a book attempting to explain the rise
and fall of nations based on race. He was not a scientist, yet he assumed
that by interbreeding with inferior races nations would loose [their] edge
and risk being conquered in turn (Wade 2014:18). There are also many
infamous instances of racism such as during World War 2 with the Nazis led
by Adolf Hitler, slavery in early American history, and eugenics as a whole.
The social concept of race is one that is still a difficult topic for
humanity today. The beginnings of racial classification came as a way to
explain things and give a place for all things in this world including humans.
Sadly, there are ideas that one race or one variation is superior to the rest.
This being the case, the social repercussions that come from this can be
devastating. After the initial classification, by real scientists, others came up
with their own ideas of what was a superior race. Gobineau, the French
aristocrat, had no scientific training yet he decided what race was best
compared to the rest. This idea of difference continued on and was more
prominent in the 19th century. The term polygeny means that every human
race developed from a different ancestor. For example, white people had a
different ancestor than Asians because they look different from each other.
This idea became more widely accepted because of the separation that
came. There was the idea that they are an other so there is a wall and an
excuse to treat them however the superior saw necessary. This idea gave
an opening and a justification to justify exploitation of indigenous peoples
and their lands, and the practice of slavery (Wolpoff and Caspari 1997:66).
There is no consequence if there is no wrong committed, technically. Socially
the separation by race just grew and grew and grew into a world wide
problem.
some. This idea of race is real and its everywhere. Its not just something
that Black Americans deal with, its a global issue that needs time and
attention. Guy P. Harrison wrote, Once it has contaminated the minds of
otherwise sensible people, racism can be maddeningly stubborn and
unresponsive to logic Racism is so dangerous and destructive that we
should not surrender to it. We have a moral obligation to confront it
everywhere and all the time (Harrison 2010: 264). As we strive to work and
align ourselves to serving humanity in a very real way, we will come to see
that racism can be done with IF we choose to let it go. To see a day when we
can see our differences and celebrate them instead of compete is a dream
that we can all achieve, if we choose to.
Works Cited:
Wolpoff, Milford H., and Rachel Caspari. Race and Human Evolution. New
York: Simon & Schuster, 1997. Print.
Roberts, Dorothy E. Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business
Re-create Race in the Twenty-first Century. New York: New, 2011. Print.
Harrison, Guy P. Race and Reality: What Everyone Should Know about Our
Biological Diversity. Amherst, NY: Prometheus, 2010. Print.