Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Surinder
Posted on August 8, 2012.
Most of us are familiar with the concept of IQ intelligence quotient and its measurement through specific testing
instruments. More recently, it has been established by respected researchers such as Howard Gardner that there are
multiple intelligences that represent unique and divergent talents not captured by traditional IQ tests. In fact, one of
these alternate intelligences, measured by emotional quotient (EQ), has actually been proven to be more correlated
with success in life than IQ, through the work of thought leaders such as Daniel Goleman.
Despite the expansion of thinking in this area, there has been no mention of a similar construct for a crucial element
of professional and organizational success leadership smarts. Most people would agree that if such a construct
can be established, the subject of leadership can transform from a fuzzy, amorphous concept that is well-discussed
but ill-defined, to a clearly crystallized, measurable skill that can be systematically assessed and enhanced.
This article will take the first step forward in endeavoring such a transformation by suggesting that such a construct to
measure leadership intelligence already exists. Its called leadership quotient (LQ), and this metric actually helps
distinguish successful leaders from unsuccessful ones.
If such a construct exists, what might the mathematical equation for leadership quotient look like, and how might it be
measured?
Let us begin to answer this question by asking ourselves a more fundamental question to which most of us can
relate: When we think about the great leaders in our lives, what was it about them that caused us to follow them?
Was it institutional power, positional influence, monetary leverage, personal charisma? All of the above? None of the
above?
When we asked this question of people, some common themes emerged in their diverse answers. And, those themes
can lead us to the mathematics and measurement of leadership. Here they are for your consideration and
contribution.
First, most people said that they chose the leaders to follow, not the other way around. Followers pick leaders more
so than leaders select followers. Free will and independent thinking makes it impossible to force anyone to follow
through the mandates of an organization chart, though many leaders try to do so. Managers may be appointed, but
leaders are elected.
Second, our respondents said that they picked the leaders they chose to follow through a
subconscious, instinctive process rather than a conscious, methodical one. And they did so not just because of the
position the leader had, or the institution he or she represented, or the wealth he or she possessed, or the personality
the person projected. Though those attributes did count in some way, they were secondary factors that represented
other primary currencies that successful leaders had earned from the their followers at a deeper level.
Third, broad consensus emerged on three primary currencies that leaders need to earn from their followers, and the
three key assets needed to be built to enable these currencies to be earned. Our respondents said that leaders they
chose to follow earned credibility from them by delivering distinctive, consistent results, trustby building dependable,
caring relationships, and respect by acquiring superior, relevant resources.
Think about that feedback for a bit. If, every time we followed a leader, we got the results we wanted, wouldnt it make
sense to follow that leader again? If every time we interacted with a leader, we trusted that he or she had our best
interests at heart, wouldnt we feel like following his or her lead? And if every time we heard a leader, the person
seemed to have in-depth domain expertise, wouldnt we respect his or her judgment enough to act on what we
heard? I suspect your answers to all three of these questions would be yes.
So, how are these critical currencies of credibility, trust and respect earned, and the critical assets of results,
relationships, and resources built? Therein lies the mathematics of LQ.
Resources are acquired by investing in competence in the industry, company, organization, function, competition,
customers, and the environment. In other words, by becoming smart about the things that matter. Most people call
that intelligence quotient, or IQ.
Relationships are built by investing in character work ethic, honesty, fairness, balance, humility, lifelong learning,
empathy, passion, compassion. In short, by becoming a better person on the qualities that count. Most people call
that emotional quotient, or EQ.
Results are delivered by investing in capabilities visioning, communicating, coaching, motivating, influencing,
negotiating, selecting, de-selecting, prioritizing, executing. Essentially, by becoming an effective person on the
actions that accomplish. We call that execution quotient, or XQ.
And there you have it. The mathematics of leadership straight from the heads, hearts, and hands of those who really
count the unnamed many who choose to follow the privileged few on whom the mantle of leadership is bestowed.
Sizeable specifically, improvable incrementally. The basic formula for finishing first in the fight for followers is this: LQ
= IQ + EQ + XQ. Follow it, and beneficial results will begin to occur.
Leadership Skills
Leadership Quotient?
Determine your leadership skill in 15 minutes by taking this quick Leadership Quotient self-evaluation for
effective leadership development in any area of your life:
"The unexamined life is not worth living."
- Plato
Whether leading yourself toward a higher path, leading a family, community, congregation, or an entire
organisation, this is a good time to reexamine your leadership effectiveness.
On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the highest, how would you rate yourself as a leader?
take several tries, but that's Ok, keep at it -- and the answer will be revealed to you. A question you could
ask might be, "What is my highest purpose?" or "How can I use my core genius to serve the greatest
good?"
Personally, I've found prayer to be the most effective means and have recently adopted a prayer that
Oprah Winfrey has used for several years, "Use me God. Show me how to take who I am, who I want to
be, and what I can do, and use it for a purpose greater than myself."
May your own hero's journey meet with the crest of the rising sun.
This article was contributed by Sharif Khan
Sharif Khan is a copywriter and communications specialist, inspirational keynote speaker, and author of
the leadership bestseller, "Psychology of the Hero Soul." He publishes his monthly Hero Soul ezine for
cutting-edge advice on success, leadership and personal growth. To contact Sharif Khan about his
business writing and motivational speaking services, call: 416-417-1259.
Scenario
Sridhar
Choice 1
Choice 2
Proactive
Reactive
Personal
Authority
Charisma
Money
Excitement
Follow
Make
Details
Vision
taken
mitigated
used
resolved
taking
giving
take existing
roads
roads
take
give
results
achievements
facilitate
Transaction
head
control
undergo
at ease
While approaching me, my team will be ___
Your Leadership Quotient is
Score
Your Category
10%-25%
25%-50%
50%-75%
75%-100%
http://leadershipquotient.blogspot.com/
Transformation
heart
make
cautious
Scenario
Choice 1
Choice 2
Proactive
Reactive
Personal Charisma
Authority
Money
Excitement
Follow
Make
Details
Vision
taken
mitigated
used
resolved
taking
giving
take
give
results
achievements
control, passion
facilitate
Transaction
passion, control
make
Transformation
heart
head
control
undergo
at ease
cautious
Score
Your Category
10%-25%
25%-50%
50%-75%
75%-100%