Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR
ROAD CONSTRUCTION IN AREAS
AFFECTED
BY WATER LOGGING, FLOODING
AND/OR
SALTS INFESTATION
(First Revision)
INDIAN
ROADS CONGRESS
2011
2014
https://archive.org/details/govlawircy201134
IRC:34-2011
'
RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR
ROAD CONSTRUCTION IN AREAS
AFFECTED
BY WATER LOGGING, FLOODING
AND/OR
SALTS INFESTATION
Published by
INDIAN
ROADS CONGRESS
Kama
Sector
6,
Koti
Marg,
R.K. Puram,
NewDelhi-110 022
MAY, 2011
(Packing
& postage
extra)
IRC:34-2011
First
Published
Reprinted
Reprinted
Reprinted
First Revision
Reprinted
(All
January, 1970
May, 1974
May, 1980
August, 1996
May, 2011
May, 2012
Rights Reserved.
No
translated or transmitted in
&
Publishers Pvt.
(500 copies)
Ltd.,
New
Delhi-110 020
CONTENTS
Page No.
Personnel of the Highways Specifications and Standards Committee
(i)
Introduction
Scope
Issues Involved
Recommendations on Methods
Water by Water
in
Road Construction
of
in
Road Construction
in
in
for
in
Areas Affected
is
Areas where
Prolonged Periods
is
in
18
Addition to
Also Expected
20
to
Annex-1
22
Some
Specific
Problems
23
29
IRC:34-2011
Sinha.A.V.
Puri, S.K.
(Co-Convenor)
Highways,
Kandasamy, C.
(Member-Secretary)
Highways,
New
New
Ministry of
Delhi
Delhi
Members
4.
Datta, P.K.
New
(I)
Pvt. Ltd.,
Delhi
PWD,
5.
Gupta, K.K.
6.
Sinha, S.
7.
Kadiyali, Dr.
8.
Katare, P.K.
9.
LR.
&
Faridabad
Associates,
New
Delhi
10.
Reddy, KSiva
11.
Basu, S.B.
12.
Bordoloi, A.C.
13.
Rathore, S.S.
14.
Pradhan, B.C.
15.
Prasad, D.N.
16.
Kumar, Ashok
New
17.
Kumar, Kamlesh
Krishna, Prabhat
R&B
Deptt.
Delhi
Delhi
New
Delhi
RCD, Patna
New
18.
MoRT&H, New
Delhi
19.
Patankar, V.L
Member (Tech.),
20.
Kumar, Mahesh
Engineer-in-Chief, Haryana
PWD, Chandigarh
mdia, Nev
Delhi
IRC:34-2011
Mumbai
21.
Bongirwar, P.L.
Advisor L&T,
22.
Sinha.A.K.
PWD, Lucknow
& AS
MoRT&H, New
Delhi
MoRT&H, New
Delhi
23.
Sharma, S.C.
24.
Sharma,
Consultant, AIMIL,
25.
Gupta, D.P.
26.
Momin, S.S.
27.
Reddy,
Ex-Scientist, Central
Road Research
Institute,
New
Delhi
28.
Shukia, R.S.
Ex-Scientist, Central
Road Research
Institute,
New
Delhi
29.
Jain, R.K.
30.
Chandrasekhar,
Dr.
V.M.
Dr. T.S.
Dr. B.P.
New
(Retd.),
Delhi
& AS
(Retd.),
PWD, Sonepat
New
Delhi
31.
Singh, B.N.
Member (Tech.),
32.
Nashkar, S.S.
33.
34.
Alam, Parwez
35.
Gangopadhyay,
36.
Singh, Nirmal
37.
Director, Central
Dr. S.
PW
(R),
New Delhi
Kolkata
Road Research
Institute,
Mumbai
New
Delhi
& SS
(Retd.),
MoRT&H, New
Delhi
Sinha, V.K.
& SS
(Retd.),
MoRT&H, New
Delhi
38.
Jain, N.S.
MoRT&H, New
39.
Yadav,
DGBR, New
40.
Jit
Dr. V.K.
Ministry of
2.
Prp;idpnt
Delhi
Members
3.
IRC
Delhi
Ex-Officio
1.
Delhi
&
New
Secretary
Secretary General
PWD
Mizoram,
Delhi
Delhi
Corresponding Members
t:K
2.
Khattar, M.D.
3.
Agarwal, M.K.
4.
3orge, V.B.
Mumbai
PWD
PWD, Mumbai
IRC:34-2011
INTRODUCTION
In
rise,
shoulders or penetration from pavement layers, the subgrade of pavements gets saturated.
Reduction in load carrying capacity of subgrade is related to the degree of saturation of
subgrade. The strength of pavement layers
of
Pavements
with
subgrade has
to
good drainage remain intact even during monsoon. The water entering the
be drained out or prevented from reaching upto subgrade level.
Shri
Mahesh
PWD,
thought to have a relook into the IRC:34:1 970, "Recommendation for road construction in water logged areas".
The work of rewriting the revised version was done by a subgroup consisting of Shri Arun
Kumar Sharma, CE, MORT&H, Mrs. Minimol Korulla, Chief Consultant and Ms. Shabana
Khan, Consultant, Macaferri. Their valuable contribution is greatly acknowledged.
The
Engineer-in-Chief Haryana
revision of
for solving
recommended are
a)
b)
Drainage
c)
d)
Depressing of
e)
of
into
underground aquifer by
vertical drain.
level of
sub
soil
etc.
geomembrane.
Recommendations for some case studies have been made in the revised document. The
was approved by H-4 Committee (Personnel given below) in the meeting held
on 13.10.2010. The Highways Specification and Standards Committee deliberated on this
document on 22.1 0.201 0 and cleared for presentation in Council Meeting. At Nagpur Council
Meeting the document was cleared with authority to Convenor to modify as per comments of
Council members. The Convenor further reviewed the document in light of the comments of
the Council members. The document was submitted for printing by the Convenor on
draft revision
12.03.2011.
Kumar, Mahesh
Convenor
Co-Convenor
Mathur, Sudhir
Member-Secretary
1
IRC:342011
Members
Chand, Faquir
Dhodapkar, A.N.
Rao, Prof.
Gajria, Maj.
Gen. KT.,
Sangal,
Gupta, Sanjay
Gupta,
Jain,
Dr.
P.J.
M.M
Singh, R.B.
Pradeep
Saha, D.C.
Naresh Chand
Sen, Samiren
Jimmy
Jain, M.K.
Thomas,
Verma
Kansal, R.K.
Chitra, R.
(Rep.
Koul, R.L.
Dr.
IVIaj.
Dir.
Kumar, Satender
(Rep. of
Pradhan, B.C.
C.E.,
V.C.
CSMRS)
DGBR)
PWD, Meghalaya
Corresponding Members
Verma, M.S.
Ex-Officio
President,
Members
DG
IRC
(Liansanga)
MoRTH
(Sinha, A.V.)
SCOPE
in
waterlogged areas,
including those subjected to flooding and/or infested with detrimental salts like sulphates
measures
to
be adopted
in
soil,
areas are considered to be those where the level of subsoil standing water
is
i.e.
water table
within about
may be up to
2
.5
water logged
such that
is
for
well within
10.0 m.
IRC:34-2011
Remedial measures
1.2
for following
these
in
recommendations:
i)
ground,
ii)
Construction of
existing carriageway
para
iii)
in
side slopes
refer
iv)
8.2).
para
will
in
cutting
line is cutting
Wet
is
pavement
(for details
8.3).
roads with phreatic line cutting the side of hill slope Wet portion
hill above pavement is an indication that phreatic line is
above the pavement level. Higher water table will soak the subgrade (for
details refer para 8.4).
Hill
of side slope of
v)
of rivers/canals
In
full
supply level
in
the
case full supply level in the canal is at a higher level, than level of
bund road, subgrade of bund road will get affected by seepage water from
canal (for details refer para 8.5).
canal.
vi)
vii)
In
para
viii)
will
rail
rail
Lack
refer
track
track
is
of
drainage
in hills will
para 8.6)
:
Effective drainage of
pavement
8.7).
ix)
Due
1 .3
to
to
water
in
Water
common
in all
will
get
8.9).
in
subgrade
para
.2
above.
require
in
IRC:34-2011
ROAD CONSTRUCTION
AREAS AFFECTED BY WATER
ISSUES INVOLVED
IN
2.1
As a
Due
to
Water Logging
result of migration of
the subgrade
soil
IN
in its
level,
bearing capacity.
Due
to Flooding
Where continuous
is
of
in
is
In
embankment. The
case
of
subgrade
in
the subgrade
may
lead to
pavement.
2.2.1
2.2.2
case flood water cannot be allowed to flow across the embankment, due to
submergence of human settlements on the other sides of embankment, then
embankment should be designed to withstand the effect of flood water. Good quality granular
soil should be used in embankment construction so that the soil remains intact during flooding.
2.2.3
In
likelihood of
embankment. Services
line
of geotechnical/irrigation
such embankment which is more or less acting as an earthen dam. Seepage across
embankment and possibility of piping should be taken care of.
2.3
Due
The problem
is
aggravated
if
in
sulphates of sodium, calcium or magnesium and sodium carbonate are present either
in
the
iRC:34-2011
in
two ways
2.3.1
In
to crust
waterlogged areas (infested with detrimental salts), the salts keep on moving up with
subsequent evaporation of the salt-laden water, the salts are left
behind and they get concentrated in the surface layers. The salts increase many times in
volume upon hydration under suitable humidity and temperature conditions. Alternate*
hydration and dehydration results in repeated formation of salt crystals occupying much more
volume than the amorphous salts lodged in the voids. In due course, these repeated volume
changes break up the structure of the pavement, working from the top downwards particularly
due to seepage/capillary rise.
Chemical
2.3.2
cement
like
Cement concrete
2.3.2.1
in
the subsoil which migrate to the top by capillary action, react with
cement
resulting
in
The reaction is
is known to lead
or
if
calcium
sulphate
in
silicate
by sulphate solution
is
magnesium sulphate
solution which
is
found generally
in
in
certain
characterized by
in
in
the hydrated
pH value
in
5.
Concrete
is
not directly attacked by solid sulphate salts, but only by their solutions
so that
is
the
it
amount
in India,
it
In
in
is
water
rate of
crystallization
relative
IRC:34-2011
attack.
As a
result of
and gradual
internal disintegration
falling
is,
however, slow.
Soil
2.3.2.2
Presence
cement
of sulphates in
2.3.2.3
It
case
soil
cement mixtures
Bituminous construction
salts, in the
in soil,
ground
water or sea water have any detrimental chemical effect on bituminous construction.
2.3.2.4
Water-bound macadam
material used
in
them
is inert
and
3.1
a)
Road
construction
in
b)
Road
construction
in
areas where
prolonged periods
is
also expected.
c)
Road
construction
are present
3.2
in
in
areas where
in
in
is
of
water logging.
some
old, while
IN
AREAS
The remedial measures recommended under paragraphs 4.1 to 4.6 could be utilized both
on new constructions and existing roads. However, the capillary cutoff technique described
under para 4.7 will be found economical only on new roads.
6
IRC:34-2011
4.1
.50 to
.80
line)
as close
to the
in
Fig. 4.1
feasible.
ROADWAY
SHOULDER
I*-
2.5m
CARRIAGEWAY
'I'
D
Fig. 4.1
Note
4.
Weepholes
in
SHOULDER
-r^2.5m
DEPTH OF DRAIN
Raising of the
seepage
of
in
Embankment
ground water
into drain
Embankment
Where
"Earthwork over existing road surface: Where the embankment is to be placed over an existing
road surface, the work shall be carried out as indicated below.
i)
new formation
level,
it
is
shall
and the
ii)
lies within
to
be met
.0
is
of
with.
IRC:34-2011
iii)
If
the level difference between the existing road surface and the
more than
new
formation level
is
.0
Low
Embankment
Existing
Height
Fig. 4.2
case,
it
is
not possible to provide drainage system for disposal of storm water then the
Embankment
4.3
In
Raising of the
about
into
vertical drain is
shown
in
a)
The discharge
b)
The
c)
d)
of
perforations
storm water
in
the
PVC
is in
permeable
strata.
The inlet pipes of vertical drain are 750 mm above the bottom of inlet
chamber so that debris will not enter the vertical drain. The debris stored in
the inlet chamber can be cleaned.
Inflow of storm water
Fig. 4.3
is
into
Underground Aquifer
IRC:34-2011
4.4
Efforts should
be made
embankment or
The thickness
dry.
MORT&H
"Specifications for
the Pavement
4.5
4.5.1
If
practical
in
of
subgrade
level
should be raised by
minimum 1.50 m above the general ground level/high flood level. Work of raising the
embankment shall be done as per Clause 13.1 of iRC:36 or relevant clauses of MORT&H
Specifications for Road and Bridge Works. In case resources don't justify raising of
embankment, then lowering of local water table is second best alternative.
Drainage of sub surface water
4.5.2
made
to
Law
Darcy's
a)
is
below
for
ready reference
Field observations
b)
to
carried out.
is
made
at closer
spacing.
c)
blanket
is
shown
in
indicating
Fig. 4.7.5.
use
of formation drains
and drainage
affected by installation
material or the
filter
it
of permeability to drain off the required quantity of water. Also, the filter
material
filter
for stable
in
drainage pipes.
4.5.2.2
Aggregate
Requirements
of
filters
aggregate
filter
given
in
reference,
is
reproduced
for
ready
IRC:34-2011
"A properly designed and installed aggregate
filter
potential. Properly,
soil particle
soil
and prevent
designed aggregate
filters
which prevents particles of the fine aggregate filter from migrating into the perforations of a
drainage pipe or granular water transport medium." A properly designed and installed
aggregate filter should be able to retain soil and prevent soil particle movement, thus
eliminating piping potential. Grading requirements for filter material given in MORT&H
specifications for road
Table 4.5.2.5
Sieve Designation
Note
Class
Class
II
100
97-100
100
95-100
50-100
100
48-100
20-60
92-100
28-54
4-32
83-100
20-35
0-10
0-5
59-96
710 micron
35-80
6-18
355 micron
14-40
2-9
180 micron
3-15
90 micron
0-5
When
the
I
soil
grading,
when coarse
The thickness
0-3
0-4
is
silt
to
of backfill material
medium sand
III
silt
Fabric
Requirements
II
grading
4.5.2.3
III
53
Table 4.5.2.5.
45
Class
Note 2
in
Class
mm
mm
26.5 mm
22.4 mm
11.2 mm
5.6 mm
2.8 mm
.4 mm
reproduced
is
mm,
the width of
450 mm.
filters
ready reference.
10
is
reproduced below
for
IRC:34-2011
"Filter fabrics or
covered
in
woven
MORT&H
bio-degradable fabric
filters
permeability of non
to
non-woven
filters
in variety.
as mentioned
geotextile
been
filters,
woven
so as
or
Specifications for
life
in
span
is
make them
suitable
filter
fine
for
a broad range of
soil
of nearly
all
filter
fabric
is
shown
in
Fig. 4.5.2.3.
_
FABRIC (FIRST
STAGE) FILTER
FABRIC (FIRST
STAGE) FILTER
GRADED
GRANULAR (SECOND
FINE
STAGE) FILTER
COARSE AGGREGATE
FABRIC WRAPPED
AROUND PIPE (THIRD
STAGE) FILTER
(b)
,
SUB BASE
COARSE
AGGREGATE
FILTER
FABRIC
Use
of Fabric
as
Filters
filter
material laid
specifications.
11
IRC:34--2011
4.5.2.5
Drainage
of low height
embankment by edge
Trench
drain.
drain
is
water
of
in
is
sufficient width
soil
mm
150
pavement
embankment as shown in Fig.
drained out of
have holes
in
lower
half.
of
is first
collected
4.5.2.5.
in
The pipe
in
a proper slope
longitudinal drain
in
in
in
and then
in
minimum 3
may be
D85
close to
of the material to
pass through
it.
based on
filtration
and permeability
criteria
(in
out).
The back
fill
should be
material.
SEALING wit:
STONE METAL-x IMPERVIOUS MATERIAL
PIPE (UPPER
HALF
Fig. 4.5.2.5
Drainage
of
Low
Height
LOCATION MARKED
/ FIN DRAIN / DRAIN WITH GRANULAR
'a'
FRENCH DRAIN
MATERIAL
PERFORATED)
The trench is then filled with granuiar material. The top of trench is covered with impervious
material/Geomembrane so that surface water does not enter the trench. Across the trench,
at
every
m interval,
a cross trench
of
same
150mm
size
fin
is
to
be provided.
In
The top
PVC/
Location of subsurface drain with respect to pavement layers can be adjusted depending
upon the
layers
is
location
shown
in
where water
is
Fig. 4.5.2.5.1
12
IRC:34-2011
Fig. 4.5.2.5.1
4.5.2.5.1
Geomembrane
Specification of
Raw
ASTM D
Permeability:
Tear resistance
4.5.2.6
X 10-^2 to
X 10"^^
mm
m/s
Puncture Strength
stabilizers.
Thickness
Note
and thermal
in
Annex-1
Frencfi Drains
'
French drains are edge drains which consist of two components, permeable drainage media
and
filter
the drain.
media. Permeable drainage media ensures that water can be transported within
The
filter
of
some
is
soil into
the
subsurface drain.
In
installed at the
Fig. 4.5.2.6.
4.5.2.7
Fin Drains
can be used
edge drains which are also referred as drainage composite edge drains that
pavement drainage purpose. It consists of plastic spacer/net enveloped in a
for
13
IRC:34-2011
The plastic spacer/Geonet substitutes for the aggregate and acts as drainage
medium. The Geotextile acts as filter. Fin drains with thick plastic core are normally capable
of transporting water both vertically and horizontally with the structure, while thinner Fin drains
Geotextile.
Fig. 4.5.2.6
fin
para
shown
in
Fig. 4.5.2.7.
4.6.2.
French Drains
Fig. 4.5.2.7
4.6
drain, refer
Fin Drains
'
Channel
Depression of subsoil water level can be achieved by providing the drainage channel with
drainage composite or V-shaped drain below which aggregate drain at the edges of the
in
of
outfalls to natural
Fig. 4.6.
Drainage composite shall be able to meet the drainage and protection requirements in
demanding water draining application. It should be able to effectively eliminate
hydrostatic pressure against below grade structures and aid in dewatering saturated soil by
collecting and conveying groundwater to a drain pipe for discharge.
structurally
4.6.1
14
IRC:34-2011
4.6.2
Geotextile properties
4,6.2.1
4.6.2.2
CBR
Puncture Resistance
EN ISO 10319
Unit
Area
(i
@
Thickness
Equivalent
of
composite material
ASTM
and
is
IS
200 kPa
Capillary Cutoff
4.7.1
As an
EN ISO - 9863
applicable to
alternative to the
all
be provided
4.7.2
property)
Annex-1
rigid
or
recommendations contained
in
paras
water
in
and 4.2, a
embankment.
4.1
the
special circumstances.
The
capillary cutoff
in
>
4.7
only
1/m2. sec
> 16 kN/m
EN ISO 12236
EN ISO 9864
In plane permeability - EN ISO 12958
Hydraulic gradient = 1)
@100kPa
Mass per
mm
>100
Note
< 0.15
may be a
Table 4.7.2.
15
gravel. For
IRC:34-2011
Table 4.7.2
Recommended Thickness
Minimum thickness
Situations
Sr.
Fine Sand
Coarse Sand
(425 micron to
(mm)
Subgrade 0.6
1.0
above
(2
Graded Gravel
mm to 4.75 mm)
(4.75
mm to 20 mm)
mm)
2
1)
of granular layer
No.
350
150
150
300
100
100
HFL(PI>5)
2)
50 percent)
The
4.7.3
water
level,
cutoff should
whichever
be placed
at least
is
in
it
shall
be positioned
m below the top of the sub grade. When provided, the cutoff medium should
i.e.
for
full
formation width as
in
para 7.2.2
level).
shown
filter
on upper
side.
Geomembrane on
in
is
to
the
function
The embankment
core allow the free flow of water and geotextile acts as separator and
surface on which capillary cutoff
in
of this
of cutoff
no case
The surface
at
as
such a
will
of the
embankment/sub-grade
at
all
Suitable types of capillary cutoffs are listed under Section 7. For any cutoff
4.7.4
cm thick
course
for
water
infiltratmg
of additional
component which
cover
will
composite (geonet)
sand
it
will
in
the
fill
of granular layer
to
of acting
cover
it
with a
as a drainage
composite there
will
be advisable
purpose
medium
need
16
filter
of geotextile
of
is
no
as one
drainage
IRC:34-2011
THE HIGHEST POSITION
OF THE CAPILLARY
CUTOFF
ZONE OF CAPILLARY
SATURATION
CAPILLARY CUTOFF
HFL
CAPILLARY CUTOFF
0.I5M THICK
0.
Fig. 4.7
Sketches
Illustrating
'
'
Embankment
Technique
4.7.5
deep
drain can be
is
used
shown
for lowering
in
table
as shown
in
Fig. 4.7.5(a)
17
rising into
pavement
layer
IRC:34-2011
sand/granular
material'
PERFORATED PIPE
CONNECTED TO SUITABLE OUTFALL
(b)
Techniques
Fig. 4.7.5
In
for
in
in
measures
well as
on
existing roads.
Raising of the
5.1
5.1
In
.1
above the
that the
detailed
Embankment
in
it
is
is
recommended
at least
.50
that the
embankment should be
much
raised so
level
as
The embankment will be subjected to wave action due to floods. To protect the
embankment from wave action, stone pitching of designed thickness over graded filter/
5.1.2
required.
geotextile
is
5.1.3
"i
Sufficient
for
at least 2 culverts/km
5.1 .4
In
should be provided.
case, water current hits the embankment, cross drainage structures of adequate
In
case,
it
is
profile of
Fig. 5.1.
18
road
embankment should be as
indicated
IRC:34-2011
Fig. 5.1
Note
in
the stretches
be
5.1.6
constructed
in
areas
where it is considered inevitable to let flood water pass over the road, also
heavy and flooding expected for prolonged periods, cement concrete surfacing of
appropriate thickness should be provided for at least two lanes of traffic. Wider paved surfaces
perform better under flooding due to distribution of traffic load in a wider area. If the pavement
at the designated place of water crossing is flexible even then there is merit in providing a
layer of 50 mm bituminous concrete as wearing coat. The cement concrete pavement should
be provided for at least two lanes of traffic. The cement concrete pavement, when provided,
should have a dry lean concrete/cement/lime stabilized soil base of 1 5 cm thick underneath
the slab. When asphaltic concrete is selected as the surfacing, the mix should be dense
graded and resistant to flood conditions.
In
situations
traffic is
profile of the downstream side of embankment should allow smooth flow of water down
embankment. For dissipation of energy of flow of water, a trough can be provided as
shown in Fig. 5.1.
The
the
5.3
In built
of road, the
water stagnates on
In
IRC:SP-63: Guidelines
be
referred:
for the
use
of interlocking
8.1 0.2)
19
jRC:34-2011
Fig. 5.3
The
following
roads,
measures
No
6.1
outlined
special
in
paras
to construction of
may be adopted
4.1 to 4.6
Similarly,
subgrade
soil is
in
Sections 4 and 5
of
up
On
in
determined
laid
if
the concentration
ground water.
trioxide) in
subgrade
to 0.2 percent in
down
in
existing
of physical/
soil
roads.
new
for relief.
and
may be
IS 2720,
Part XXIII 'Methods of Test for Soils: Determination of Calcium Carbonate', and IS 2720, part
XXVI l-'Methods
No damage
with
in
Where the
is
certain
is in
excess
of the solutions
is
Flexible
6.2.1
Roads
Even
if
in
with granular
para
6.1
in
base
above, special
construction.
These
filler
is
(met
5.
Pavements
concentration of salts
described
salt solutions
higher than
used
in
macadam
macadam and
forth in Section
4 are
water bound
harmful salts.
20
and
free from
IRC:34-2011
Stabilized soil construction
6.2.2
a)
Mechanical Stabilization
b)
stabilization
stabilization using
Fly
Ash"
(IRC:SP-89)
Bituminous stabilization
c)
If
in
salts,
the
used for stabilization should not contain more than 0.2 percent of total soluble sulphates
and carbonates or stabiiization shall be with the cementitious materials which are resistant
to CI and SO^ salts.
soil
Besides
this, to
in
in
soil
in
para 4.7 should be provided underneath the pavement extending across the
full
width of the
roadway.
6.3
Rigid
Pavements
Since
all
of
para
6.1
initial
when
one
for
by a
fully set,
it
is
of
slab, or provision
adoption
light
in
concentration
in soil is
mentioned
in
para
4.7, are
conditions,
i.e.
in
excess
coatings used should be thicker (For the purposes of this specification, thin coats are
considered to be those
in
Furthermore, the following measures are suggested as suitable for minimizing adverse
in
water
is
is
will
have
recommended
IRC:34-2011
ii)
6.3.2
In
is
danger
pH values
damage from
of
of
below
slag
5,
below the concrete pavement, such as heavy duty bituminized paper or polythene sheet, and
use
of
a dense, well compacted, high quality concrete are the measures recommended
for
adoption.
7
7.1
Sand blanket
of
as an effective capillary
capillary action
depends on the
full
The thickness
cutoff.
particle size of
width of
of the
embankment
is
recommended
to intercept
formula:
where
t
d
Qf^
The sand
shall
Alternatively,
it
in
cm
= mean
particle
diameter
in
mm
be compacted
after
the
facility of
7.2
Some
7.2.1
to permit
vibratory roller
is
is
retained.
easy
rolling.
available.
HOPE
resins, duly
contrasted, that comply with the most rigorous requirements established for their use.
The
than 5 percent of carbon black, antioxidants and thermal stabilizers. For specification of
geomembrane
refer
para 4.5.2.5.1
22
IRC:34-2011
Provision of drainage composite
7.2.2
over the
full
width of
additional
7.2.2.
is
generally provided
in
of capillary cutoff.
Geotextile properties
EN ISO 12956
EN ISO 11058
< 0.15
mm
>8kN/m
>100//m2.sec
Mass per
unit
area
>410g/m2
Impermeable geomembrane
Water proofing extruded
film
by Polyethylene
MD EN
GBR
EN iSO 1 2236
Puncture Resistance
Mass per
In
Unit
Area
(i
Note
7.2.3
Equivalent
and
IS
@100kPa
1)
composite material
ASTM
>
3.5
kN/m
> 2.2 kN
200 kPa
EN ISO 9863
-
in
>0.6//m.s
>0.55//m.s
>5
mm
Annex-I
8.1
of
EN ISO 1 2958
@
Thickness
ISO 1 031 9
EN ISO 9864
plane permeability
Hydraulic gradient
Existing
within Capillary
Fringe
it
is
in
23
of the
pavement should be
IRC:34-2011
raised as mentioned
level of
sub
soil,
in
para
difficulties in raising
8.2
4.2. In
Addition of
in
low height
in
para
embankment
is
4.5.
shown
the
embankment, the
Schematic arrangement
in
for
Fig. 4.5.2.5.
Carriage on
Low Embankment
Fig. 8.2
Water falling
in
system consisting
existing
of
water
Fig. 8.2
by drainage
Pavements
level of
off
embankment).
EXISTING
8.3
inlet
of
New
in
Carriageway
side of road as
shown
is
Fig.8.3.
is
Higher Level
Cutting
at
of adjoining high
lowering water table. For specifications of aggregate drains refer Tabie 4.5,2.5.
Fig. 8.3
Road
24
in
Cutting
in
IRC:34-2011
8.4
Hill
of Hill
Slope
8.4.1
a,
in
Sub
on the
to the
Hill
problem
side,
lies in
line. In
Hill
side.
soil
hydraulic studies
is
pavement
is
an
needs to be carried
in
The water so
intercepted
V-shaped drain
in
the drains
for
storm water on
may be
hill
suitably disposed
off.
8.4.2
hill
wall/Gabion (machine
retaining wall should
filter
Concrete caping
and
in
hill
side,
and
made woven
mm
as per IRC:56-2010)
at pipes
8.4
is
it
wall so that
in
shown
in
directly in the
open
(c).
longitudinal drain.
Sub Surface
25
IRC:34-2011
Perspective View of
26
Hill
IRC:34-2011
River/Canal Running on
8.5
One Side
of the
pavement on bund
Road
(if it
BUND ROAD
UNIDIRECTIONAL CAMBER
SUBSURFACE DRAIN /
FRENCH DRAIN FIN
DRAIN CONNECTED TO
SUITABLE OUTFALL
/
River/Canal on
Fig. 8.5
8.6
In Hill
Roads
at
One
Side of Carriageway
At such bends
8.6.1
Hill
after extra
on
hill
hills.
in
m width
8.6.2
pavement
in
8.7
If sufficient land is available between road and rail track, for disposal of storm
open drain/underground sewers should be provided. These open drain/underground
sewers need to be connected to suitable outfall.
8.7.1
water,
8.7.2
In
difficulties in
shown
in
Fig. 4.3.
in
Fig. 8.7, at
into the
can be considered.
2m
STONE BALLAST
27
A and
B.
IRC:34-2011
8.8
i)
in
para
it
areas as mentioned
in
para
5.3.
8.9
Velocity
Till
at
such
High
pavement width
at
(for
dispersal of
traffic
is
constructed,
The
such location should be two lanes with paved shoulders. For passing the
of embankment may have to
embankment dry stone pitching may
On upstream
side of
as per IRC:89.
IRC:56-2010)
may
embankment
filled
If
made woven
filter
geotextile or suitable
filter
layer
be provided. For dissipation of energy, water trough and details of treatment to the
in
para
The
are covered
in
Fig. 5.1.
Pavement
to
be provided
in
embankment
is
covered
5.2.
solutions as
recommended
in
para
can be adopted as per site requirements. For site specific design for
recommendation made in para 8.1 to 8.9, service of specialist shall be taken. For design of
drainage following guidelines may be referred for further details
of solutions
>
IRC:SP-42
>
"Guidelines on
Road Drainage".
28
IRC:34-2011
Annex-1
(Clause 4.5.2.5.1)
s.
Designation
Designation
Designation
No.
(ISO)
(ASTIV!)
(IS)
1)
EN ISO 12956
ASTM D
4751
IS
14294
Title
2)
EN ISO 11058
ASTM D
4491
IS
14324
a Geotextile
by Permittivity
3)
EN ISO 10319
ASTM D 4595
Properties of Geotextiles by
the Wide-Width Stnp Method
4)
EN ISO 12236
ASTM D 4833
IS
13162
Geosynthetics
puncture test
5)
EN ISO 9864
ASTM D
--
Static
(CBR
test)
5261
Mass
EN ISO 9863
ASTM D 5199
Nominal Thickness
of
Geosynthetics
7)
EN ISO 12958
ASTM D 4716
products
--
Determination of water
flow capacity
29
in their
plane
>
IRC
this