Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
2d 1529
In this appeal, we must determine whether the District Court erred in holding
that it had no subject matter jurisdiction over appellant's Sec. 1983 suit which
alleged that his federal rights were violated when the Supreme Court of Florida
denied his Petition for a Rule to Show Cause why he should not be admitted to
the Florida bar.
3
4
For purposes of subject matter jurisdiction, the Supreme Court has recognized a
critical distinction among cases brought in federal district court by disgruntled
state bar applicants. See D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103
S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983). In essence, there are two types of claims
which a frustrated bar applicant might bring in federal court:
Federal district courts have jurisdiction over the first type of claim but not the
second. Feldman, 460 U.S. at 486, 103 S.Ct. at 1317, 75 L.Ed.2d at 225.
According to the Supreme Court:
United States District Courts ... have subject-matter jurisdiction over general
10
12
13
AFFIRMED.
Honorable John R. Brown, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit,
sitting by designation