Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
3d 95
Istvan Martus appeals from a conviction by jury for violating 8 U.S.C. 1326,
which makes it a felony for an alien who has been previously arrested and
deported to reenter the United States without the express consent of the
Attorney General to reapply for admission. The appellant contends that the
evidence that he lacked the permission of the Attorney General to reapply for
admission to the United States is insufficient to sustain the government's burden
of proof of his guilt. We disagree and affirm the judgment of conviction.
In December of 1994, Martus entered the United States in Buffalo, New York
by crossing the "Peace Bridge," which connects Buffalo and Fort Erie, Ontario,
Canada. As he walked past the U.S. Customs Office, the appellant indicated his
presence by gesturing through the glass. Because the glass was tinted, Mr.
Martus could not see how many officials were inside or what they were doing.
No one stopped Mr. Martus, or requested identification or any other
information from him as he crossed the border. Mr. Martus now asserts that
failure of any official to stop or question his use of this recognized border
At the time of Martus's arrest, title 8, Section 1326 of the United States Code
provided that:
(1) has been arrested and deported or excluded and deported, and thereafter
(2) enters, attempts to enter, or is at any time found in, the United States, unless
(A) prior to his reembarkation at a place outside the United States or his
application for admission from foreign contiguous territory, the Attorney
General has expressly consented to such alien's reapplying for admission; ...
shall be fined under Title 18, or imprisoned ..., or both.
11 Newton ... we held that [the government] need prove only that the previously
In
deported alien intended to reenter the United States. It is a short and logical step
from that holding to the conclusion that good faith or mistaken belief on such an
alien's part that he or she could reenter lawfully is not a defense.... We read the
statute to mean what it says: A previously deported alien who reenters the United
States does so at his or her peril, and any subjective belief as to the legality of that
act is irrelevant.
12
13
Honorable Janet Bond Arterton, District Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation