Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Rule 5: Can we always go with this logic on the MAX(OI) and MAX(CHG in
OI)?
NO. This might not work during the last week of Expiry when the Market makers
are closing their positions. So during the last week of Expiry better to stay away
from the market or Play the market using the Implied Volatility
Rule 6: In the CHG in OI, what if we get Negative values? What signals
does it give?
If we get the Negative values in "CE", that means Market makers (BEARS) are
squaring off the Call Positions (The SHORT Positions). So heavy squaring off in CE
is a BULLISH signal and we have to expect a BREAKOUT if there is a sudden spike
in the squaring volume. There is a panic situation. Normally this will happen all of a
sudden in say 10-20 minutes and we have to exit the Shorts immediately and can
GO LONG.
It is the Vice versa if we get Huge Negative Values in "PE".
If we get Negative Values both in PE and CE, then blindly SELL the OI pair
Note : I am still discovering and learning about the Volatility. So will give more
details when it comes. But in summary, if the Volatility is Low, then it is a Buying
market and if the Volatility is High it is a Selling market. Experts should be able
to throw more light on volatility
Rule 8: Respect the Strike Price where the MAX Pain is situated
The Strike where the MAX Pain is like the Centre of Gravity. So especially during
the Expiry the market will try to move and will try to expire around the MAX Pain.
So in the last week of expiry one should avoid any OTM call around the MAX Pain
because the OTM calls around the MAX Pain will expire worthless.
For Example in Jul13 Expiry the MAX Pain on 22-Jul-13 is at 6000. So any 6100,
6200,... Calls will expire at Zero value. Similarly for 5900PE, 5800Pe, etc,,,
For Expiry, the important observation or the learning is the MAX Pain
theory. The 6000 pair which was trading at around 110+, today is trading
half the value of 55. Tomorrow it might even become Zero if market
expires exactly around 6000
For a Particular Strike if the Volume is Greater than the CHG in OI then it can be
considered as a Strong trend.
For example if you take the 6000 PE strike.
6000 PE - Negative value of -45200
6000 PE volume is - 40K
So you can surely Trade Long on 6000 PE. This is not the Right example because
the 6000 PE CHG in OI is negative. But if you have a scenario where the CHG in OI
< Volume then it is strong signal of Bearish. Same hold true for CE also.
So simple rule is the value in Volume - I consider it as Long
The Value in CHg in OI - I consider it as Short.
So whichever is greater , you trade in that direction.
So if CHG in OI > Volume - Better to Sell the strike
If CHG in OI < Volume - Better to Buy the strike.
This is purely based on my observation based on initial thought from
Option.Trader.
So observe the Volume and CHG in OI - You will get an idea.
One more observation is that if the Volumes are not that great, that also indicates
FLAT market
OK. It is my own logic. It need not be 100% Fool proof.
When Market was trading around 5930, I always take the 5 strikes for my
calculation. So it would be ATM strike, 2 ITM strikes and 2 OTM strikes.
So it was 5700, 5800, 5900, 6000 and 6100.
For Each strike, I find what is the Trend, It could be either BULL, BEAR or FLAT.
I calculate the overall Trend using the Overall "CHG in OI:. Here the "Overall"
means only my 5 strikes. So i don't consider what is happening below 5700 or
above 6100.
The Trend came as "Bear". Then I count the number of "Bear". If it is more than 2
then I take it as a Strong Bear.
So today closing had
5700
5800
5900
6000
6100
Bull
Bull
Bear
Bear
Bear
At the time I wrote as "Weak Bear", 5900 was indicating as "Bull" and you saw the
market coming UP from 5908 to 5960...
That is when I asked to close the positions at 5945 and the market finally closed at
5927.
Today the CHG in OI at CE being added above 5900 (in 6000, 6100) was 19L.
Today the CHG in OI at PE being added Below 5900 (in 5700, 5800) was 16L.
The Overall CHG in OI at CE was 24L
The Overall CHG in OI at PE was 15L
MAX at the individual Strike level,
11.77L added at 6000CE
8.63L added at 5800PE
So base is being built at 5800PE, which would be anyway Tested.
5600PE Volume 107,297 > COI - 96,000 - When Volume is more than COI, then
normally as per my understanding you can GO Long on this 5600PE. Accordingly if
you see 5600PE which opened at around 21 closed at 26.2.
PCR - I normally use it as a indicator for Reversal. If you see a PCR of say 1.25-1.3.
Then you can see profit booking. Same is true if PCR is around .75
(-chgoi ), unwinding taking place at that strike level as previous writers are nervous.
Volume < chgoi as pointed out indicates fresh shorting at that level
Now at 5800 Ce
OI = 21,00,050
COI = 3,37,050
Volume = 43,475
Since COI > Vol, it means big players are having open positions as short at this strike.
When COI starts decreasing and will become -Ve it will show that they are covering their
shorts. Am I right in understanding this ??
Regards
Taiki
While Volume > CHG in OI we can Go Long on the strike, If Volume < CHG in OI the
Reverse of Going Short should be True ? Not necessarily. So always choose the Best
strike to Go LONG or go SHORT.
General Rule
Never go LONG on the strikes where the MAX OI or MAX CHG in OI is present
because they are the candidates being Short.
Another way of deciding S/L is to close positions when the losing leg ( in this case
PE) reaches total premium collected, corresponding price of the other leg being the
loss to be borne.
In trending market playing pairs is unprofitable. The swings are killing all strike
levels. Also on good times you might make 10-20 points but you are missing on
huge swings of 200-300 points that say for eg Jamit is able to reap in by being
directional. So do we have to rethink on pairs in a trending market. This year is
really weird, we have had 300 point swing every month
You wrote: Direction is Bearish and VOLT is low. So the Strategy is to sell the ATM Call.
As vola is low, prices of options are low. So why sell a low priced call instead of buying a
cheap put which will, when market jumps down, increase in value very quickly. As in a drop
vola also will rise, this will be an other help to the puts price increase. Further will you not
block much money for a naked sold position. You even could use some of that money for
the long leg and increase the amount of lots you trade long. If market really drops further,
as suggested from you, your profit on the long put would be higher compare to the sold call.
Just some thoughts from my side and if I missed the point or did miss interpret any of your
post's, just let me know. It is your system and you know what you do. So do not take it
personal. It may gives some more room for further discussions.
Take care and good trading / DanPickUp
@Dan,
First of all thanks for writing. Please do not have any second thoughts about your
comments/suggestions. I will always take it the right sense. The only way we will learn
more is with the help of selfless Experts like you.
Coming to the Strategy
- First of all the Tool is not able to dedect a Reversal.
- So if the VOLT is Low and Direction is Bearish, then it suggests a SELL ATM Call. When the
VOLT is low(and assuming it will go further down), the SELL will give more profit than
buying a PUT.
- If the VOLT is High and Direction is Bearish, then it would have suggested a Bear Spread SELL ATM Put + Buy OTM Put.
- One more important thing why I always want to Sell is so that indirectly I will not be able
to take more position and so that my risk is also Low.
- As suggested by you, If we go Long we can buy more quantities and so my risk also will
be high. So I am consciously avoiding this out of Fear... May be I will have to get out this
slowly when my confidence goes up.
May be the problem is also on the logic of calculating the Volatility. Correct me If my logic is
wrong. I take historic Volatility from the NIFTY Futures which is at 21.3%.(I will use this to
find out if the VOLT is high or low). The average IV for PE @ 18.32. The Average IV for CE
@ 17.32. Since both the IVs are smaller than the HVOLT, the tool concludes the VOLT as
low.
@Healthraj
Thanks for your detailed answer.
Here some more numbers to the used margin.
The concept is even used for smaller option traders account with Think or Swim
broker. The second point is about your bear spread and the third point is the IV on
options.
- Margins: Shorting options will block 25'000 in your account. That money not
works. On the other hand: Going long will cost you under 250, depending what
option you take (otm, atm, itm / this months series, next month series). Looking at
the possible reward we get with the long position and the money which is blocked
and looking at the possible reward we get with the short position and the blocked
money, it favors long.
Looking at it from that perspective, the reward you will get in the long run on the
short positions in your market with that margin rules looks far worse compare to
the longs, as you always have huge amount of money blocked you could work with.
Lets assume you take 10 longs with 250, you then have invested 2'500 = blocked
money or margin or just the money you have to bring on the table to pay them. No
further money needed. This is still only 10% from 25'000 which is blocked for one
position. If you now could make 250 with that one position or 250 with the 10
position, what would be your answer (readers of this post)compare to the blocked
money? Each persons choice, but surely worth a deep thought.
- An other point to spot on: If the VOLT is High and Direction is Bearish, then it
would have suggested a Bear Spread - SELL ATM Put + Buy OTM Put. Why? Market
down and high vola = Sell atm call and buy otm call. That at least is for me the
right spread in that situation. But as always: Personal choice.
- About calculating vola. I think you do fine with that. Puts have in some markets
under certain conditions a higher IV compare to calls and in other markets the calls
have always a higher IV compare to puts. Have posted about the subject in the
thread of Columbus. And that is why option trading is not random. Put takers (if
short or long) in Nifty take at the moment a slightly higher risk, but have a slightly
higher reward for that.
Take care / DanPickUp
My take on this... and i think it may be peculiar to the Indian markets. In Indian
markets, liquidity exists only in near month contracts... hence the premiums on
near month contracts are comparitively higher. Now the way to make money in
long options is a) it is a trending market b) the trend continues strongly for a
period of time. As pointed out by Raj's study earlier, Indian markets trend only
20% of time. And in the four weeks you get to make profit out of your options, it is
a battle of diminishing returns. The time decay hits heavily and even in trend,
options starts loosing value. This leaves only 1 option to trade longs, you uncover
the trend before it happens to really get the 2x-3x return from longs, which is a hit
and miss strategy.
But for the same reasons mentioned above, 80% of the time, nifty is in a range
and by going with Max OI, you have a safety barrier which more or less remains
unless something catastrophic happens and even with that you can come safely out
with min stop loss.
So which is a more probabilistic trade.. taking the 80% route or 20% route?
Along with the max pain theory, we know that 90% of options loose their value, so
would you be a buyer or a seller and eat the premiums?