Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1
Contents
Abstract
Introduction
Architecture in Detail
4.1 Site: Topography
1.1 Context
4.2 Threshold
11
1.2 Subtext
4.3 Materiality
13
1.3 Focus
A Regionalist Approach
2.1 Regionalism versus Vernacular
Architecture in Principle
3.1 Layers in History
3.2 Venice
Conclusion
17
References
18
Bibliography
20
2
Abstract
Currently, we inhabit a world in which globalisation is becoming a progressively
dominant phenomenon. It is becoming increasingly accepted that a uniform,
global, architecture is inappropriate in responding to the varied rich, diverse
regional variations and cultures. Often, it is the architecture of a region which defines
its place within the world.
As such, current thinking suggests that globalisation threatens to eclipse the idea of
the locale entirely. Within the built environment there is a responsibility to resists
these global pressures.
Characterised by the parameters of context, a regionalist architecture signifies the
exclusivity of a place.
This paper, through a comparative analysis of two exemplary regional-modernists,
Richard Murphy and Carlo Scarpa, will investigate the reasoning and arguments of
their work and its relationship to contemporary architectural regionalism;
underpinning the necessity for regionalism as an approach within architecture.
Articulated within their works is a language which, in its sensitivity to place, is
timeless. Ultimately, it is the vivid dialogue which exists between the two architects
which is the focus of this paper.
3
Introduction
which tensions such as those between globalisation and localism, modernity and
Often a balance is sought to adapt certain global ideas, such as the integration of
1.1 Context
The world which exists today is a world of increasing contemporary globalisation1.
only achievable though, if the architect is willing to accept that this concept is
1.3 Focus
The world today demands such a high level of fast-paced affordable production that
The architects, Carlo Scarpa and Richard Murphy, are exemplary in their regional -
ultimately though, this does often result in the loss of cultural identity.
Murphys thorough academic studies into the work of Scarpa have had an immense
influence on his own architectural principles, which can, at times, be explicitly
observed within his work. Significantly though, each architect has his own
4
architectural language whose development can be traced back through to the
The specific materiality which might have established a building within its context is
citys identity is fast becoming obscured by the calamitous nature of what many
architecture.
Thus far, Murphys affinity with Carlo Scarpa has been well-referenced. However, an
in-depth direct comparative analysis of the ideologies and principles of the two, has
not, to current knowledge, been undertaken.
itself within its context as, often, architects feel compelled to make a statement by
creating something quite alien within its surroundings. Daniel Libeskinds
deconstructavist approach provides compelling evidence of this. [Fig.1]
The intent then, is to explore the dialogue between the two architects. With emphasis
on tracing a narrative through Murphys buildings alongside Scarpas ideals, the
dialogue will become apparent: rich in its moments of synchronicity and equally so
where divergence occurs.
1.4 Murphy: as Architect
Fig. 1
Saying that architecture should be of its own time may be stating the obviousbut
todayfor a city to be a living organism it must accept the architecture of its own
time; to make history for future generations and to enrich rather than disrupt its
context.
Ironically, Murphy excels by doing precisely the opposite: his forte is not making a
statement. His is an architecture which responds directly to place. [Fig.2]
His architecture might be clarified as a series of contrasts. Having worked on
Richard Murphy
Richard Murphy has a very clear understanding of the world in which we dwell. Most
significantly, he understands the impact of the effects of globalisation within the
built environment.
Fig. 2
several intervention projects, where the architect is forced to work with what is
already there, he has developed a rich, meaningful architectural language. Clarifying
the new alongside the old, successfully, is not an easy task. Like Scarpa though,
Murphy conveys this quite effortlessly.
5
His architectural language is holistic in the respect that a single idea can be traced
from its conceptualisation right through to the finest of details. This method,
specifically, is one on which Carlo Scarpa has had the greatest of influence.
1.5 Scarpa: as Architect
A Regionalist Approach
2.1 Regionalism versus Vernacular
Canizaro (2007) compares regionalism and the vernacular. He states that where
the vernacular is a necessary response to the specificity of local conditions social,
published a book entitled Carlo Scarpa: Layers. In it, she comprehensively explores
way of general definition we can say that it upholds the individual and local
exceptionally vast topic which extends beyond the scope of this paper. However,
this concept will be explored in respect to the dialogue which exists between Scarpa
and Murphy.
global.
which it is situated. The historicism of Venice has compelled his entire ethos.
Furthermore, concerned with the tectonics of architecture, the legibility and
effect, timeless.
ultimately dictate the outcome. (Heath 2009) These filters describe the collective
regional forces acting on a particular place, such as; temporal and topographical
6
Significantly, the architectural vernacular provides cohesion and a subsequent
contextual narrative which is regionally comprehensive.
the architectural psyche. In much of the architecture produced today however, there
is little evidence of a response to this. What must surely then be ascertained is why
through the existence of architecture pertaining to place and locale: the linguistic
response to place.
world. Recognisable within Murphy and Scarpas ideologies, regionalism forms the
Further to this, Unwin (2009) draws a distinct comparison between the idea of
base strata.
7
2.3 The City: Regional Stratification
Architecture in Principle
The experience and memory of humankind are laid down in layers in the physical
environment, concretely and graphically. Every new part exploits ancient forms,
materials and ways of making. Building is, at base, a sign of hope, a sign of
History, crucially, is not solely about the past. It is the signifier of growth: of
evolution. Evidently the past is the sculptor of the present, and of the future.
Both Murphy and Scarpa base their entire architectural philosophies on the
existence of the layers inherent within place; within society. Although regional
specificities dictate the differences between their resulting architectural languages,
their shared belief in an architecture which is forward thinking is clarified by
Murphys assertion that a city must embrace the architecture of its time, in order to
make history for future generations. (Weston et al 2001)
There is a complexity within cities. Through time, rapid social, cultural and
economic developments cause cities to expand exponentially. As such the
numerous strata constituting these dense urban environments is evident, particularly
so within cities enriched by their history. As regional-modernists, Scarpa and
Murphy each from a city whose complexities are profound, Venice and Edinburgh
respectively, there exists an affinity between architect and environment. Through the
refinement of a citys inherent complexities there is the establishment of a syncretic,
contextually rooted architecture.
At its core, the formation of a city over a prolonged period of time is the essential
element in shaping the architectural vernacular. As discussed, there is consistency
within the regional filters which define the fundamentals of a vernacular architecture.
While this is true, time also permits evolution within societies. Ultimately, it is social
progression which dictates change within the vernacular form. The input of the
individual, especially, is the heart of an architecture of experience. Within the
regional-modernist mechanisms of Scarpa and Murphy, this concept is absolute.
For both architects, the city is in essence, their architectural palette. Regional filters
can be rendered as the primary; their subjective input, the secondary. As architects,
both ultimately, are sculptors of their environment.
3.2 Venice
Within the historicism of Venice are numerous strata. Through a holistic
understanding of the qualitative elements, Scarpa had the ability to develop an
architecture whose contemporary language can be read as an evolution of the citys
history and regional specificities.
8
Historically, due to its complete inaccessibility, Venice was unaffected by the
machine age. As such, the absence of industrialisation is a resonant factor within the
However, the emerging dialogue between the two architects becomes especially rich
city. Globally, cities are governed by the existence of the motor vehicle. Venice
where the parameters of place are made evident within their linguistic divergences.
Edinburgh. Both limited however, by natural parameters; the alluring waters of the
city. Situated with a large body of water, separated entirely from mainland Italy,
Typified by their respective constraints, Scarpa and Murphy separately maintain their
own architectural narratives. There is strength, though, evident in their combined
dialogue particularly within the juxtaposition of certain design outcomes.
Scarpa was at once an architect of his time, and an architect ahead of his time. The
Richard Murphy has often acknowledged his great affinity with Scarpa and has made
clear the influences which have manifested themselves within his own architecture:
identity wrought by the materiality and geography, and significantly, the special light
in principle and in practice. Scarpas influences extend beyond the end product;
just as Murphys ideals are inclusive of the design process and ultimately, the
Above all, Scarpa recognised these place defining elements as being intrinsic to
the nature of the subjective architectural experience. According to Mazzariol et al
(1987) Scarpa was not interested in the randomPlace meant the space where
some rite was made manifest. Certainly, his is an architecture of experience within
Like Scarpa, Murphys absolution in the importance of place permits the subtle
9
an understanding of Scarpas reasoning which Murphy has allowed to influence the
language of his own architecture.
Architecture in Detail
In order to provide clarification of the modern regionalist approach by Scarpa and
selected works. Modern regionalism, typically, can best be observed within the
responsive to both time and place. He recognises that while lessons from the past
can be relevant in the present, they are not absolute. Mazzariol (1987) describes
rich dialogue between the architects, the selected works all fall within the spectrum
of intervention2.
but the intention was to recompose a previous reality and send it on, to recommend
and entrust it to a future time. Murphys innovation and ability to understand the
appropriateness of the built environment with relation to its current social context,
If a building sits within its site, particularly where there are changes in the
further enriches his language within the mainstream Scottish architectural tradition:
a language even more firmly anchored to that sense of place. (Weston et al 2001)
develop the design. If the hypothetical site were to be entirely levelled out the idea
hypothetical forms of a lost vernacular. The term Critical Regionalism, in his view,
the same site to receive the stepped form of a building is an engagement in the act
of cultivating the site. It evokes the method alluded to by Mario Botta as building
topography, context, climate, light, tactility and tectonic form. (Mallgrave and
the site.
Goodman 2011) All of which constitute the reasoning of both Murphy and Scarpa.
Essentially, though, it is the site which is the basis for the creation of an architecture
of place.
2
10
Richard Murphys Dundee Contemporary Arts Centre [DCA] completed in 1999, is
perhaps the most appropriate example of contention with topography. The L-shaped,
multi-function arts building contends with an eight metre fall between the entrance
level to the north and the rear of the building. There are five stories arranged within,
with only two levels evident upon entry from the north side. [Fig.3] Successful in its
subtleties, Richard Carrs article entitled Vertical Hold (1999) is apt: Murphy
utilises the stepped, exterior spatial conditions with a central spill out space,
accessible from the caf area within. This space is further stepped and wrapped
around the building to the lower level surrounding the university galleries. An
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
elegant public throughway from north to south is therefore permitted. Inside, Murphy
Carlo Scarpa similarly adopts the approach of layering into the site. Working in
exploits the change in level with a dramatic staircase dominating the central public
Venice however, where the city is very much a horizontal entity compared with the
entrance level; this further acts as an extension to the street outside, seamlessly
verticality of the Scottish cities of Dundee and Edinburgh, Scarpas response differs.
drawing the public into the depths of the building. [Fig.4] Carr (1999) suggests that
Instead his is an approach to floor planes; maintaining the horizontality of the site.
Within his project for the renovation of the Querini Stampalia Foundation (1963), the
adjustment of various elements within the floor plane are a necessary geographical
response; designed to allow water from the adjacent canal to penetrate the building
The specific culture of a region becomes inscribed into the form and realisation of
in the event of potential flooding the aqua alta. In the entrance area, the upper floor
the workwhich arises out of in-laying the building into the site. It has the
plane maintains a raised border over which a lower floor stratum is visible:
capacity to embody, in built form, the prehistory of the place and its subsequent
essentially, a moat. When there is a flood, the floor in this room consists of a
cultivation and transformation across time. Through this layering into the site the
concrete plane, a layer of water, and a raised concrete slab covered with marble
mosaic. [Fig. 5, 6] (Shultz 2010) At once, Scarpa merges topographical strata with
(Foster 1990)
11
unique characterisation as a direct response its geographical situation. Richard
properties of a place. Significantly, they direct the flow of people. If one considers
the street for example, it is entirely defined by the built environment. The expansion
and contraction of spaces is didactic; where tight alleyways lead to narrow lanes;
busy vehicular routes link to pedestrian boulevards. [Fig.7] Within this spatial
sequence transition is key. It is a necessary layer which permits cohesion. Where
architectural intervention is concerned, the creation of a transitional space is
fundamental in the evolution of the architectural language. A space between the new
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
and the old is simultaneously part of both, and part of neither. Crucially though, it
aids the integration between the conflicting elements. [Fig.8]
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
As human beings, the act of transition has an immense effect on the subjective
4.2 Threshold
Experiencing products of architecture involves movement. One passes from
outside to inside through the serial stages of a route a place where one stops -
experience. This occurs both externally and internally. In the design of a building,
both are equally fundamental.
these may be called static places. But the pathway from one static place to another
a space. There is always the contention, for example, with the unfamiliarity of a
(Unwin 2009)
12
openness within public buildings. Initially, this issue can be lessened with the
effective extension of what is, categorically, a familiar part of the public realm: the
Fruitmarket gallery is situated directly off a main street. The canopy is subtle, yet the
street.
impression of precinct is still apparent. The scale of the DCA meanwhile, allows the
building. Certainly, Murphy often employs this tactic. His DCA, for instance, is
partially pulled back from the busyness of a main vehicular route into the city centre.
This simple move creates what is effectively a secondary pedestrian area, belonging
to the building: a precinct, which, as Murphy ascertains, gives breathing space to
the street edge. [Fig.9] (Weston et al 2001)
The idea of an entrance transitional space is not confined to the groundscape;
roofscape can also provide a similar experience: the use of canopy is a fundamental
transitional element. Employed, typically, as a response to climatic conditions, the
Fig.10
Fig.11
Further to this, parallels can be drawn alongside Scarpas entrance space at the
Querini Stampalia.
Similarly to the Fruitmarket Gallery, the Querini Stampalia sits quietly in its context,
maintaining the likeness of the surrounding facades. The canalled system however,
is ever present; where Murphys galleries are concerned with the street, Scarpa is
concerned with the water. Indeed, the entrance to the building is quite special, and
certainly well defined: the threshold between street and building is made manifest
by an elegantly designed bridge. The Scarpa-esque detailing is an event in itself: it
signifies the crossing literally and metaphorically between old Venezia and the
Fig. 9
13
unique Scarpa intervention. Frampton (1996) describes the bridge as a fixed hinge;
4.3 Materiality
apt in its tectonic properties. Perhaps even more significantly, is the evident
Concrete and time-bound, heterogeneous and particular, our feeling for place
appreciation of the horizontality of street meeting the abrupt verticality of the palace
space humanised as the Dutch architect Aldo van Eyck defined it is grounded in
building threshold dictates the asymmetrical camber of the bridge. (Murphy 1993)
(Weston 2008)
As with any intervention project, there is a fine line between the creation of a
contemporary architectural language and the existing. Each is held in significant
The properties and application of material within the works of Murphy and Scarpa are
juxtaposition with the other. Scarpa, typically, succeeds in clarifying the new
of the utmost importance. Typically, the inherent materiality within their respective
alongside the old. The fundamental bridge element respects the existing, but does
regions further enriches their architectural palette. Within their separate narratives,
not replicate. As such, there is an entirely new and unique transitional experience
the tactile qualities of material are most significant; its visual and physical properties
Thus far, the concept of threshold has been discussed with primary reference to the
properties of physical barriers. Further to this, materiality and light can also be
highly indicative of threshold.
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
14
architecture as craft and as an act of place creation from the process. Within the
works of Murphy and Scarpa, this statement can be disproved. Inherent within their
work is the subtle integration of modern technologies as a means by which
innovation and revitalisation of tradition can be achieved.
Scarpa, particularly, had an affinity with the unconventional sculpting of material. He
immensely enjoyed the play of the perception of material. In the Querini Stampalia,
the stonework can be perceived at once as simple cladding and then as a kind of
wood. (Shultz 2010) The travertine, cut as a panel, is ingrained with the visual
properties appropriated to timber panelling. [Fig.15] For Scarpa, however, the real
masterstroke manifests itself within the articulation of material as a space defining
element.
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Richard Weston (2008) describes the impact of challenging the natural climatic and
temporal filters with specific reference to the white architecture of the International
Style4. Within this style there existed a high maintenance demand in order to
sustain the intended pristine architectural image, unaffected by the course of time.
Conversely, both Murphy and Scarpa uphold a positive preoccupation with time as
a tool with which they permit a natural evolution in a buildings dialogue. Key social
the architectural language. The complexities lie within the methodical arrangement
thinkers, John Ruskin and William Morris also shared this attitude. Morris,
particularly, argued that there should be clarity in the definition of what is new, and
what is old. (Weston 2008) Certainly, the stratification of elements facilitates this
vocabulary: roof, wall and floor plane. Each defined as separate entities, yet
clarification.
Murphys DCA is exemplary in adopting the principle of layering the faade. The
In his work there pervades a disjunctive narrative in which what is, is always
intervention with an existing brick warehouse is evident with the retention of its shell.
accompanied by what has been and what might have been.(Frampton 1996)This
between the old and new through the literal separation of material. The historic brick
15
shell, pulled away from the contemporary pre-patinated copper cladding has the
fundamental handrail, while the adjoining teak and brass equivalent provides the
resultant effect of one material slipping seamlessly past the other. Murphys
integral tactility required of such a device. 5 Where the two are connected the
junction is paramount. Pairs of steel flat bars conclude the composition, evidence of
the inherent tactility of the copper and brick. [Fig.16] Within this separation, there is
Fig.18
Fig. 19
Inherent within the intervention projects as discussed, is the ability to provide a clear
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Glass and steel are employed with the same intention and with equal success in
Murphys Fruitmarket Gallery. The existing stonework having been largely retained,
sustains the secondary layer of steel structure within which there is the integration of
a hoist and sliding glass screen. [Fig.17] Expression of structure, evident at a larger
scale within the works of Murphy, can similarly be observed in Scarpas detailing.
The bridge at the Querini Stampalia contains a dialogue almost entirely its own.
Initially, the purpose for what appears to be a twin handrail is perplexing. However,
distinction between the numerous strata, of which the ultimate sculptor is light.
Wholly place specific, the tonality of light in Venice differs entirely to that in
Scotland. However, the principles in utilising the element remain constant.
Typically, it signifies reassurance within the public domain. As such, it is often
employed as a guiding element through the depths of a building: a principle evident
in Murphys galleries. [Fig. 20, 21]
Light, in its ability to transform spatial perception, is the ultimate element which the
architect must master.
This same principle is evident also within the work of the Finnish architect Alvar Aalto;
his iconic leather-bound door handles specifically. (Weston 2008)
6
As Frampton (1996) so entitles his chapter on Scarpa.
16
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
17
Conclusion
Within the dialogue which exists between Richard Murphy and Carlo Scarpa, there is
an inherent linguistic cohesion between architect and place. Arguably, Scarpa was
one of the first regional-modernists. His architectural language is, typically, the
evolution of his great affinity with the city of Venice. Through his accentuation of the
idiosyncrasies within Venetian culture he was able to produce an architecture whose
relevance pervades time.
Scarpas ideologies, as such, embed themselves within contemporary architecture.
The principles within Murphys regionalist approach are evidence of this. Indeed, it
is the constant underlying factor of place and subsequent regional specificities
which enable the existence of the vivid dialogue.
Regionalism within architecture, significantly, sustains the locale. It reasserts the
importance of cultural identity within our increasingly globalised world. Ultimately, it
sustains the diversity which formulates our global identity and world culture.
Ours is a world in which cultural divergences signify our exclusivity as a whole.
18
References
Crippa, M.A. (1986) Carlo Scarpa: Theory, Design, Projects. Cambridge: MIT Press
Dal Co, F. and Mazzariol, G. (1987) Carlo Scarpa: The Complete Works. Great
Britain: The Architectural Press
Images
Heath, K. Wm. (2009) Vernacular Architecture and Regional Design: Cultural Process
and Environmental Response. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.
19
Morgan, P [2008] Figures 13 and 19 Querini Stampalia Bridge [online] Available at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pmorgan67/2274241918/in/faves-bbaunach/
[accessed on 8 January 2012]
Murphy, R. [1993] Figures 12 and 18. Querini Stampalia Site Plan/ Entrance Hall
Section.[book]
Murphy, R et al. Figures 2, 11, 16, 17, and 21 [online] Available at:
http://www.richardmurphyarchitects.com/view_item.aspx?item_id=50186&list_id
=list1-50163&list_index=18&add_cat=For the Arts [accessed on 8 January
2012]
Shultz, A-C.[2010] Figures 5 and 15. Section diagram through hallway/ Stone
Cladding [book]
Weston, R et al. [2001] Figures 3, 4 and 20. DCA Sectional Perspective/ Main
stairwell/ DCA foyer [book].
20
Bibliography
A.J. Murphys Magic (1999) The Architects Journal. (April) pp. 26 33
A.J. Religious Conversion: Murphys Arts in Church. (2004) The Architects Journal.
(May) pp. 28 35
Albertini, B. and Bagnoli, S. (1988) Carlo Scarpa: Architecture in Details.
Cambridge: MIT Press
Arnold, D. et al. (2006) Rethinking Architectural Historiography. Oxon: Routledge
Canizaro, V.B. (2007) Architectural Regionalism: Collected Writings on Place,
Identity, Modernity and Traditon. New York: Princeton Architectural Press
Holl, S. (2009) Urbanisms: Working with Doubt. New York: Princeton Architectural
Press
Kirk, T. (2005) Architecture of Modern Italy, Volume 2: Visions of Utopia. New York:
Princeton Architectural Press
Leatherbarrow, D. (2009) Architecture Oriented Otherwise. New York: Princeton
Architectural Press
Lotus International. Sustainability. Issue 140.
Mallgrave, H.F. and Goodman, D. (2011) An Introduction to Architectural Theory:
1968 Present. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing
Murphy, R. (1997) The Work of Richard Murphy Architects: Buildings and Projects.
Richard Murphy Architects
Crippa, M.A. (1986) Carlo Scarpa: Theory, Design, Projects. Cambridge: MIT Press
Dal Co, F. and Mazzariol, G. (1987) Carlo Scarpa: The Complete Works. Great
Britain: The Architectural Press
Foster, H. (1990) Postmodern Culture. London: Pluto Press
Nesbitt, K. (1996) Theorising a New Agenda for Architecture. New York: Princeton
Architectural Press
Goy, R.J (1989) Venetian Vernacular Architecture: Traditional Housing in the Venetian
Lagoon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Heath, K. Wm. (2009) Vernacular Architecture and Regional Design: Cultural Process
and Environmental Response. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.
21
Unwin, S. (2009) Analysing Architecture. Oxon: Routledge
Van der Laan, D.H. (1983) Architectonic Space. The Netherlands: E.J Brill
Weston, R. (2008) Material, Form and Architecture. London: Laurence King
Publishing
Weston, R. et al. (2001) Richard Murphy Architects: Ten Years of Practice.
Edinburgh: Fruitmarket Gallery
Wilson, P. (1999) Culture Club. The Architectural Review. (August) pp. 38 43