Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
1. My Context: New School, New Challenge
This fall, I will teach fourth grade at a Title I school in Vista, California, a different
school than the school I taught at in the 2015 2016 school year. My new school is in the same
school district as my old school, Vista Unified School District (VUSD), but my new school has
decidedly different demographics, which presents a new challenge, one I have sought out. My
new school is over 90% eligible for free or reduced lunch (FRL), unlike my old school, which
was only 29% FRL eligible. Also, over 50% of students in my new school are English Language
Learners (ELL), more than twice VUSDs percentage, unlike my former school which was only
10% ELL. Significantly, only 31% of fourth grade students at my new school were proficient in
English Language Arts (ELA) on last year's California Assessment of Student Performance and
Progress, or CAASPP, and only 4% of ELL students were proficient.
I am changing schools in part because I believe my new school can make good use of my
primary area of expertise: ELA instruction for ELL students. Success in history, science, and
mathematics depends in large part on ELA ability, I believe, and so I emphasize ELA
development in the classes I teach, especially in classes with many ELL students, which is the
sort of class I typically teach. My approach to ELA instruction for classes with many ELL
students involves the provision of many opportunities to write, because ELL student writing skill
does not meaningfully improve without ample practice, Ive found. In the past, I have used
journaling (i.e., via handwriting and paper) to increase ELL student comfort with writing, which
Ive found to be a precondition to increasing ELA skills of ELL students, but writing via
computer is increasingly required in school and beyond, and so it is time to update my approach.
To continue to develop ELL students toward mastery of ELA skills, and toward computer
literacy, which I take to be the primary needs of ELL students, my class will need as much
computer-based writing practice this fall as I can possibly provide, and certainly more than Ive
been able to previously provide via limited piloting of a particular application or online activity.
In my experience, ELL students typically have less access to computers in the home than nonELL students, and reduced comfort and familiarity with computers as a result, so writing
instruction for my fall class should be conducted exclusively via digital classroom software. For
this to work, I will need hardware that is easy to use, software that is easy to use, and teacher
training on the software. Hardware is a settled matter: my new school has one Chromebook for
each student. So this paper will focus on reviewing the literature on digital classroom software
for the purpose of selecting the right digital classroom software for a class like mine.
Because Chromebooks rely on and use software stored on the cloud (i.e., software as a
service, or SaaS), rather than relying on software installed on the machine itself, I will need to
choose for my class a cloud-based digital classroom service like Edmodo, Moodle, Schoology, or
Google Classroom. Because schools tend to have limited Internet bandwidth that must be shared
among many classes, I expect the bandwidth available for my class will be limited. So the digital
classroom software I select must not be too bandwidth-intensive. Also, the software selected
must not require of student machines a lot of processing power, storage space, or memory, as
Chromebooks are not particularly powerful. Last, the software must be very easy to use, because
my ELL students in particular will have likely limited experience with technology, as discussed
above. Research into these matters will be required.