Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
3d 826
SUMMARY ORDER
1
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record from the United
States District Court for the Northern District of New York, and was submitted
by plaintiff-appellant pro se and by counsel for defendants-appellees.
decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed
substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Baer's Order and Opinion dated
March 15, 1995. In addition, we note that proof of negligence would not suffice
to establish a deprivation of due process, see, e.g., Daniels v. Williams, 474
U.S. 327 (1986); Davidson v. Cannon, 474 U.S. 344 (1986), and that the record
provides no basis for an inference that nondelivery of the letter in question was
the result of any intentional wrongdoing, rather than negligence.
3
We have considered all of plaintiff's contentions on this appeal and have found
them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.