Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
6 August, 1998
Distribution list
Telfort Mobiel Taher Farkondeh
David Charlton
Bob Berger
Frits Vrijlandt
Henk Boonzaayer
Martin Janssen
Steve Houghton
Theo van der Wiel
Russel Whitworth
Sean O’Neil
Gary Hawkins
Radio Planning Team Leaders
CONTENTS
1. Introduction..............................................................................................................4
1. Introduction
The Amsterdam Schiphol airport, one of the busiest international airports in the
world, is expected to provide substantial roaming traffic and hence, revenues, for our
mobile network. Because mobile units often pick the strongest received signal to
derive service from while roaming, it is imperative that we provide very good
coverage throughout the Schiphol Airport complex.
It is assumed that the mobile traffic immediately outside of the airport building
and on the road approaches to and from the airport will be covered by an external cell
site on an airport building or in its immediate vicinity.
Several Access Points (which are basically the desired antenna locations) have
thus been identified in each of the above areas. These are also shown in Figures 1, 2,
and 3 for the terminals, arrivals, and departure halls respectively and listed in Table 1
below. The seemingly large number of access points are necessitated by the modular
construction of the airport, the radio propagation environment, limitations of the
equipment used, as well as the need to provide very good signal levels to subscribers.
The access point locations shown are based on site surveys achieved with our Site
Acquisition team and the airport representative.
The Amsterdam Schiphol Airport has initially been pre-designed using basic
assumptions concerning the access points (location of antennas) and some subjective
decisions related to the expected traffic within the Airport’s indoor environment.
Visiting the whole Airport with its representatives revealed that the initial design has
to be modified because some sites cannot be acquired or merely the solution adopted
is not a feasible and viable option. Moreover, some restrictions arose concerning the
possibility of installing our infrastructure (BTSs and/or antennas). Subsequently, the
RP Support Group ought to modify the configuration and/or the location of the BTSs
and the antennas within each visited building. This document yields the detailed
design according to the above mentioned constraints.
3. Coverage areas
The areas to be covered are the same as those previously mentioned in the
initial document except that the actual proposal does not include the train station and
the parking garages. These shall be added later on when the visit has been completed
with the concerned authorities.
4. 1. Arrivals
i) Arrivals 1 (South)
ii) Arrivals 2
Shark-Fin antenna
Micro-BTS
RF Cable : 15 m maximum
Comments : Very Low Priority (corridor may be covered by Arrivals 1 and
Arrivals 2 BTSs)
iv) Arrivals 3 (West)
4. 2. Plane Terminals
ii) Gate G
Smoke-Alarm antenna
Part of a Compact BTS (2 TRXs)
RF Cable : 10 m
Possible equipment location : Room # 1471
Shark-Fin antenna
Part of a Compact BTS (4 TRXs)
RF Cable : 80 m
Possible equipment location : Room # 1471
Smoke-Alarm antenna
Micro-cell
RF Cable : 15 m
Possible equipment location : Room # EF-2639
Comments : highly important business area. Libertel installed a smoke-alarm
antenna with a microcell.
viii) Gate E
Shark-Fin
Antenna Location : in the middle of the Gate inside the illuminator signs
RF Cable : 10 m
Micro-BTS
Possible equipment location : Room # EP-1140
x) Gate D (TOP)
Very good clearance with respect to the neighboring outdoor sites : No additional
indoor coverage is hence required.
One Shark-Fin antenna in the middle of each corridor (D main, D1 and D2)
Compact BTS (2 TRXs for each of the 3 corridors)
1 Master Unit
3 Remote Units (one for each antenna)
Fiber optic cable : 200 m + 2×300 m = 800 m
Possible equipment location : Room # DP-C028
Comments : Only fiber optic solution is possible because of long distances (high
RF cable losses in 1800 MHz band) between the BTS and the antennas.
4. 3. Departures
Omnidirectional antenna
Micro-BTS
RF Cable : 15 m
Possible equipment location : available room within the check-in itself
ii) Departures 1
Omnidirectional antenna
Compact BTS
RF Cable : 45 m
Possible equipment location : room # 0680
iii) Departures 2
Omnidirectional Smoke-Alarm
Compact-BTS
RF Cable : 40 m
Possible equipment location : behind the Libertel advertisement
Shark-Fin antenna
Micro-BTS
Antenna Location : Near the “Juggle Sandwich Bar”
RF Cable : 50 m
Possible equipment location : room # 0547
vii) Departures 3
5. Concluding remarks
The main concern was the coverage of the strategic areas within the Schiphol
Airport buildings with a rough estimate of the expected traffic. Furthermore, Telfort
should consider that the traffic will no longer be uniformly distributed and, therefore,
more refined traffic estimate will have to be undertaken. The proposed design takes
into account the RP’s observations on the field but also combines the information
given by the Airport’s representatives concerning the best locations to be used for both
the antennas and the BTSs. Furthermore, it is very important to point out that the
design given in this proposal shall be used provided that each equipment room and
antenna location will remain unchanged.
ANNEXE 1
TRX 1 RF Cable
Hybrid
Combining
TRX 2 To Gate F (splitting Area)
TRX 3
TRX 4 RF Cable
Hybrid
Combining
TRX 5 To Gate F (Corridor)
TRX 6
TRX 1 RF Cable
Hybrid
Combining To Arrivals 1
TRX 2
TRX 3 RF Cable
Hybrid
Combining
TRX 4 To Arrivals 2
TRX 5 Hybrid
RF Cable
Combining
To Departures 1
TRX 6
TRX 3 1:2
Master
Splitter
Unit
TRX 4
TRX 1
Short RF Cable
Hybrid
Combining To Microcell-based option
TRX 2 Location
TRX 1
Hybrid Combining RF Cable
TRX 2
To Arrivals 3
TRX 3
TRX 4 RF Cable
Hybrid Combining
To Lounge West (between
TRX 5 Gate F & G)
TRX 6