Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Certificate of permit for certain type or types of works, which influence the safety of capital
construction objects No. 0080.04-2014-7805298382--159 dated 07.04.2014
St. Petersburg
2014
.. Mashkantsev
S.Yu. Dobrovolsky
Technical Director
Chief Project Engineer
St. Petersburg
2014
2014
General Director
OOO PI Petrohim-Technologia
Korablin O.V.
2014
DEVELOPED BY
Position
Manager of Environmental
Protection Department
Environment Engineer
Signature
Date
05.11.2014
Name
O.N.Vasheva
05.11.2014
T.O. Manyakhina
Date
05.11.2014
Name
O.N.Vasheva
. .
. .
Position
Compliance assessment
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
. .
. .
CONTENT
1.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS ..............................................................................................................9
1.1 PURPOSE OF EIA. ....................................................................................................................................9
1.2 FACILITY LOCATION .............................................................................................................................10
1.3. GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING PROJECTED ACTIVITIES ..............................................................12
1.3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITY ..........................................................................................12
1.3.2 TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS ............................................................................................................16
1.3.3 FEED RAW AND PRODUCIBLE PRODUCT .............................................................................................22
1.3.4 BERTHING, OFFSHORE AND HYDROTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTIONS ......................................................22
1.3.5 CHARACTERISTICS OF VESSELS .........................................................................................................23
1.3.6 WATER AREA OF THE PORT, APPROACH WATER-WAYS AND SAFETY OF NAVIGATION ....................23
1.3.7 MANPOWER AND WORKING HOURS ..................................................................................................24
1.3.8 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PRODUCT ................................................................................................25
1.3.9 ENGINEERING SUPPORT OF THE FACILITY .........................................................................................25
2. EVALUATION OF CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS IN THE OBJECT
LOCATION AREA
26
2.1 NATURAL CLIMATIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SUBJECT AREA .......................................................32
2.2 AMBIENT CONCENTRATION ..............................................................................................................34
2.3 GEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK OF THE AREA .............................................................................................34
2.4 HYDROLOGY .....................................................................................................................................35
2.5 FISHERY CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AREA .........................................................................................38
2.5.1 Fish fauna and economic importance ..............................................................................38
2.5.2 Characteristics of fish food reserve .................................................................................41
2.6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC SITUATION ............................................................................................................44
2.7 SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS (SPA) ...............................................................................................45
2.8 PLANT LIFE CHARATERISTIC .............................................................................................................48
2.9 WILD ANIMALS CHARACTERISTIC ....................................................................................................49
Amphibia and Reptiles ...................................................................................................................49
Avifauna .........................................................................................................................................49
2.10 CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES ...................................................................................................51
2.11 MINERAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................................................51
3.
THE FACILITY'S IMPACTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT.......................................................52
3.1 THE FACILITY'S IMPACT ON THE ATMOSPHERE ................................................................................52
3.1.1 THE FACILITY'S IMPACT ON THE ATMOSPHERE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD .......................52
3.1.1.1 RESULTS OF CALCULATIONS OF POLLUTANT GROUND LEVEL CONCENTRATIONS DURING
THE CONSTRUCTION ....................................................................................................................................55
3.1.1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES ..........................................................................................................57
3.1.2 FACILITY'S IMPACT ON THE ATMOSPHERE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF ATMOSPHERIC
EMISSION SOURCES DURING OPERATION ...................................................................................................57
3.1.2.1 CHARACTERISTICS OF ATMOSPHERIC EMISSION SOURCES DURING OPERATION ...............................57
3.1.2.2 RESULTS OF CALCULATIONS OF POLLUTANT GROUND LEVEL CONCENTRATIONS DURING
OPERATION .................................................................................................................................................60
3.1.2.3 ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES.............................................................................60
3.1.2.4 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................61
3.2 IMPACT ON THE GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT.......................................................................................61
3.2.1 MEASURES FOR PROTECTION OF SUBSURFACE RESOURCES AND THE GEOLOGICAL
ENVIRONMENT ...........................................................................................................................................63
3.3 IMPACT ON THE LAND RESOURCES .......................................................................................................64
3.3.1 LAND ALLOCATION ...........................................................................................................................64
3.3.2 IMPACT ON THE SOIL MANTLE AND LAND USAGE ............................................................................64
3.3.3 MEASURES FOR PROTECTION AND SUBSTANTIAL USE OF LAND RESOURCES AND SOIL
MANTLE .....................................................................................................................................................66
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
. .
.
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
According to Guidance Assessment of anticipated environmental impact inflicted by economic
and other activities in RF approved by Order No. 372 dated 16.05.2000 it is required to develop a
document entitled Environment impact assessment (EIA).
Basis for this is Contract No. 6-035-14- dated 11.10.2014 between CJSC Cryogaz and PI
Petrokhim-technology LLC.
PI Petrokhim-technology LLC activities are fulfilled in compliance with design works permit
Certificate ( 01 -08-13-102--016 dated 01.08.2013 (Appendix )) enabling the company
to carry out works which may impact safety of capital construction objects.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
. .
. .
Projected construction site of the Terminal is situated in Vyborg District of the Leningral
Region and occupies a territory of the Ryuevyalinniemi Peninsula and adjacent waters of Bolshaya
Pihtovaya Bay.
Bolshaya Pihtovaya Bay creates a natural cover for vessel mooring. The global direction of
Bolshaya Pihtovaya Bay is SE-NW.
The Terminal construction is planned to be directly at a passage into Vyisotsk port at 800 m to
the north from Terminal RPK-Vyisotsk LUKOYL-II.
In the east there is the automobile road from highroad Saint Petersburg - Primorsk - Vyborg to
Vyisotsk and rail track, which approaches close to Terminal RPK-Vyisotsk LUKOYL-II. The
nearest railway station Popovo is located about 8 km to the east from the site.
Vyisotsk is located in the distance of 1930 m from the single apartment block being the nearest
populated locality and 2470 m from the settlement of Pihtovoe.
The Terminal location considering sanitary protection zones of neighboring enterprises in the
territory of municipal formation Vyisotskoe town is presented in Figure 1.1.
Fairway No. 6 running to Vyisotsk port passes halfway in the distance of 700 m from the beach.
The coast in the assumed construction locality is wooded, trees and bushes approach to the
water line. The beach is restricted within 5-15 m. Ground coats of the beach are composed of sands,
gravels, pebbles, stones, and boulders.
The site territory of future construction is grass-covered. A rugged topography falling to the
aquatory is changed here and there as a result of construction works. Elevations are changed from
0.0 m to 11.0 m with decreasing to the aquatory.
The aquatory bottom represents seawater terraced plain, boulders are also observed on its
surface. Surface ground coats of the bottom in the coastal area are presented with sands, gravels,
pebbles and stones, the sludge appears at a depth of more than 7-9 metres.
The projected hydrotechnical constructions are assumed to be placed in the shore, where 6meters isobath passes at 30-50 m and 10-meters isobath at 100-130 from the shore.
A land plot of approximate square 50 ha is necessary for the terminal construction taking into
account advanced enlarging. The chosen land plot at the Ryuevyalinniemi Peninsula at Vyisotsk port
allows placing the whole Terminal with required infrastructure.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
10
. .
.
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
11
. .
. .
area.
Treating facilities zone
The treating facilities of LNG Facility are isolated into a separated zone to provide the required
distance to beach of the Gulf of Finland with according to norms for protected strip of land.
Flares area
The flaring system of LNG Facility is located in the special area at the safety distance from
processing units and administrative zone. There are operating and standby flares in the area. The acid
gas incineration unit is adjacent to the flare area.
Administrative zone
The administrative zone involves buildings of administrative center, fire station, medical
station, storage areas, machine workshop, emergency stock diesel power station and etc. There are
offices, laboratories, and operating procedure control center in the administrative building.
Gas withdrawal line from gas main pipeline Leningrad-Vyborg-National boundary
Natural gas will be transported to specialized terminal by pipeline transportation with gas
withdrawal line (GWL) from gas main pipeline Leningrad-Vyborg-National boundary. The tie-in
point into gas main pipeline and design specifications are defined in the specifications approved by
OJSC Gasprom, which are presented in Appendix 2 and Appendix 3.
GWL consists of:
gas main pipeline (530 mm diameter, 5.4 MPa working pressure, 41,277 m laid length)
from tie-in point into available gas main pipeline Leningrad-Vyborg-National boundary 1 and 2"
to the projected LNG Facility in the area of the Ryuevyalinniemi Peninsula at Vyisotsk port;
startup chamber of treating facilities (SCTF) - 6090m;
loopings across water bodies of the Gulf of Finland 3 off;
receiver of treating facilities (RTF) - 6090m;
cathodic protection station (CPS) 3 off;
cathodic protection cables (CP) with anodic earth conductors (3 off);
areas of block valves (BV) (6x6m)
power supply lines VL - 6 kV for the projected BV, SCPC (2 off, - 4500 m, 505 m);
tote roads to projected BV, SCTF, RTF (6 off, 150 m, 1600 m, 3000 m, 550 m, 150 m,
600 m).
Pre-project documentation requires the complex protection from soil corrosion of the projected
GWL to LNG Facility. In accordance with conducted calculations, installation of three cathodic
protection stations are required on the whole length of GWL.
The following facilities shall be provided in SCTF, RTF and BV areas:
electric supply with commercial account of electric energy;
telemechanics;
lightning protection;
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
12
protective earth;
fire and security alarm;
system of engineered safety equipment (ESE) with access check;
technologic approach and turning of vehicles on required tote roads;
landscaping.
1.3.2 Technological solutions
A block scheme of Facility for liquefied natural gas production (LNG Facility) is presented in
Figure 1.3.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
13
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
14
. .
.
. .
Each several processing line of capacity of 330 thousand tonns of LNG annually consists of the
following elements:
Gas suction and measurement unit
Gas suction and measurement unit is intended for:
pressure control of feed gas directed to the processing units and protection from excess of
safe working pressure;
gas separation to separate fluids and mechanical impurities;
flow measurement of feed gas directed to the processing units.
Gas receiver and measurement unit consists of parallel measuring lines, each several includes
feed gas separator, flow measurement and pressure control lines.
Mercury removal unit
Element mercury in the certain conditions can produce the prompt corrosion or increase the
frangibility of aluminium equipment such as coil wound exchangers.
In addition, mercury creates compounds with exchanger material, which essentially weaken the
exchanger work. The mercury component is required to be disengaged from gas flow up to 10 nanog/m3. Mercury is removed from feel gas in a single motionless mercury adsorbent vessel. The
adsorbent vessel is filled with absorbent carbon layer.
Acid gas removal unit
This unit is designed for acid gas to be removed from natural gas. Acid gas mainly consists of
2, H2S traces and sulfur-containing additions.
To decrease the probability of pipes freezing and blocking in the liquefaction unit it is
necessary to remove 2 from natural gas. H2S and sulfur-containing additions result in active
corrosion of LNG Facility equipment.
Acid gas removal technology is based on BASF patent-protected technology of amine
treatment, which uses patented (activated methyl diethanolamine) as absorbent.
When having removed solid and liquid particles in the inlet separator and mercury impurities,
feed gas enters the amine treatment unit where it contacts with absorbent in contraflow. Saturated
methyl diethanolamine (absorbent) is regenerated in the separate recovery column. Saturated acid gas
flow is directed to the acid gas flare and treated gas is fed to the feed gas drying unit.
Feed gas drying unit
Water is removed from feed gas coming out from acid gas removal unit in the feed gas drying
unit.
Gas is dried to prevent the hydrate formation in the gas liquefaction unit. The hydrate
formation can result in blockage of processing units and equipment. Gas drying unit allows to dry gas
up to water content less than 1 mln / 1 (mol.).
The moisture-saturated feed gas is sent to molecular sieve drier (adsorbers) from acid gas
removal unit. There are tree adsorbers in the gas drying unit. These adsorbers operates in the periodic
mode. Drying is carried out in two parallel adsorbers. The third adsorber operates in the regeneration
mode.
Water resorbed during regeneration is removed in the gas separator. To regenerate the
absorbent, a part of dried gas about 7 % is used Regeneration gas coming out of adsorber is subject to
the repeated compression and return to feed gas flow.
Gas liquefaction unit including mixed refrigerant compressor
Leaving the gas drying unit, the treated and dry natural gas under pressure of 3.7 5.4 MPa
and temperature of 13 enters the liquefaction unit.
The liquified gas production process is developed by company Linde AG under trade mark
LIMUM - the mixed refrigerant cycle (MRC) consisting of three refrigeration cycles.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
15
precooling using refrigerant with nitrogen, ethylene, butane and methane taken from feed
gas;
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
16
. .
.
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
17
. .
. .
The following main subsystems are parts of system consisting of three flares:
emergency working system for heavy flows;
emergency working system for dry flows;
emergency working system for LNG storage and loading;
working flaring system;
system of spare flare;
liquid flare.
Drainage and effluent treatment system
Drainage facilities of the Terminal provide the treatment of domestic, processing, rain and
melted waste waters flowing from separate collection system.
Mechanical and biological methods are used for waste water purification.
LNG storage reservoir
The LNG storage is provided in the single reservoir of pressure tight type with outer shell of
prestressed reinforced concrete. The total operational tank volume of LNG storage is 26,000 m3. The
reservoir works at the gauge pressure of 3-4.5 kP and the temperature of minus 160 .
In the LNG storage reservoir there are three groups of immersed pumps (main and standby
pumps in each group) of vertical type with capacity:
from 500 to 2,000 m3/h for loading to tankers of volume 20,000 m3;
from 100 to 500 m3/h for loading to tankers of volume 500 m3;
from 10 to 50 m3/h for loading to road tanks.
Liquefied gas is pumped to LNG loading system.
LNG loading system
Loading system is designed for LNG loading to tankers of volume capacity from 500 m3 to
20,000 m3 and LNG loading to road tanks.
Maximum capacity of loading system to tankers is 2000 m3/h.
Loading of maximum tankers batch of 20,000 m3 in normal conditions is about 12 hours.
One processing line for loading of liquid product and one return line of boil off gas are
provided at the waterside.
LNG fuel-filling column with foundationless weight allows charging the transport tank with
liquefied natural gas and returning the boil off gases. The weight for commercial account of realized
LNG is included into the Facility.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
18
1.3.3
To produce the specified amount of LNG, 1 bln m3/year of natural gas as a feed raw is required
to be fed to LNG Facility.
LNG represents a cryogenic fluid as a mixture of hydrocarbons of C1 C10 family and
nitrogen with dominant fraction of methane (0.850.99), colourless and odourless, atmospheric
boiling temperature is about -160 (111.7 ) at atmospheric pressure, and density is 430-480
kg/m3. It is the same natural gas from physical standpoint, but being at other aggregative state
liquid state. When liquidizing, natural gas achieved the reduction in volume more than 600 times.
LNG is lighter than benzene by factor of 2, non-toxic, chemically inactive, combustion products
contain less carbon monoxides and nitrogen oxides than compressed natural gas due to the best
treatment when liquidizing. LNG marine freight is carried out with specialized tankers- gas carriers.
When transforming LNG in gaseous state (regasification), its properties correspond to properties of
pipeline natural gas in accordance with GOST 5542-87.
. .
. .
1.3.4
The construction of one shipping terminal of LNG is required in accordance with performed
calculations of port calls and considering intensity of filling the tanker-gas carrier for shipping of 660
th. tonnes/year.
The loading system shall be installed for LNG loading into tankers-gas carriers at the shipping
terminal consisting of:
one loading arm of DN 12/8for LNG loading and boil off gas suction from tankers- gas
carriers;
gas blowers for LNG vapor return to tank battery for storage at the LNG Facility.
there will be a place for installation of second loading arm for LNG loading to small
bunkering tankers at the top buildings of LNG shipping terminal in future.
There will be also installed systems of protection, fire fighting, guard consisting of:
protection system from hydraulic impact;
system of automatic foam fire fighting;
system of drenching and water curtain around the periphery;
lightning protection and light;
safety system equipment in accordance with International Ship and Port Facility Security
Code (ISPS Code);
equipment of offshore post to cross the RF border.
To provide normal service of marine port in accordance with RD 31.3.01.01-93 Guidelines for
Process Design of Marine Ports the berth for moorage of harbor vessels shall be constructed.
Berth lengths for loading the liquefied natural gas into tankers-gas carriers and harbor vessels
mooring have been calculated and presented in Table 1.3.1.
Table 1.3.1 - Berth lengths
Description
LNG loading berth
Harbor vessels berth
Length, m.
235
153
Bottom elevation at the LNG loading berth in accordance with calculation is minus 10.00 m.
The berth is connected with the Terminal territory by approaching trestle.
The harbor vessels berth is designed for elevation bottom of minus 6.00 m. The berths of LNG
loading and harbor vessels are designed for natural depths that allows to prevent bottom dredging in
accordance with effective navigation charts.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
19
Offshore infrastructure providing for operation of tankers-gas carriers and harbor vessels
consists of 2 zones.
1-st zone LNG loading berth with approaching trestle, harbor vessels berth and sea
special subunits (if necessary), checkpoint of Federal Frontier Service, pumping house for foam and
water extinction with seawater intake structure, control room at berth, utility facilities;
2-nd zone bank protection and treating facilities.
Hydrotechnical constructions consist of:
LNG loading berth of the length of 235 m, approaching trestle of the length of 108 m.
Structural elements: trestle on metal pipes, topside of assembled and cast in-situ reinforced concrete;
harbor vessels berth of the length of 153 m moorage wall with foundation of steel shells
of 10 metre diameter filled with PGS;
bank protection of slope type.
1.3.5
Characteristics of vessels
Tankers-gas carriers in number of 3 vessels filled by turns are assumed to be used for marine
freight of LNG.
Main characteristics of vessels of this type are presented in Table 1.3.2.
Table 1.3.2 Main characteristics
Characteristic
Length overall, m
Width overall, m
Freeboard draft, m
Deadweight, t.
Volume capacity of tanks, m3
Flag
Classification society
Ice reinforcement (DNV)
. .
. .
1.3.6
Parameter
157.7
25.0
7.3
10,400
20,000
Finland
DNV
1A Super
Port Vyssotsk is located in the Northern part of the island Vyssotsky in the Gulf of Finland, 90
km from Saint-Petersburg and 50 km from the Russian-Finnish border.
The port consists of three terminals coal-loading, oil-loading and the separated Sea Terminal
(SST) on the cape Putevoy.
Piloting in the port area is compulsory. Using tug-boats for safe entrance and exit, mooring
operations and shifting is also compulsory.
Entering and leaving port is carried out round the clock during all seasons. During the winter,
icebreakers service is provided by the Basin Committee for Icebreaker Ships headed by the captain of
the sea port Saint-Petersburg Major Port.
In the port Vyssotsk, the requirements of international conventions for environment protection
are applied as well as the requirements of the Russian legislature for environment protection. The
captain of the sea port Vyssotsk monitors observance of these requirements by business entities
(ships) in the port.
The water area of the sea terminal for LNG in the commercial sea port Vyssotsk is limited by
the water area adjacent to the LNG loading terminal from the South-Eastern border of the water-way
No.6, the cape South Transund and the island Tikhy. The water depth in this water area of the port is
10 m and deeper; the size of the water area ensures safe maneuvering and approach to the berthage.
In order to estimate the actual depths, depth measurement shall be carried out throughout the water
area within the framework of design and exploration works.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
20
The ships approach to and exiting from the berth is mainly supported by the available means
of navigation equipment and the ships motion control system (SMCS).
For all ships in the approach ways to the sea terminal, piloting is compulsory.
The water area adjacent to the berths of the base of harbor vessels and special vessels division
is big enough for maneuvering the auxiliary ships.
In order to ensure navigation safety in the water area of the sea terminal, 8-m high lighted port
signs of the type Column are installed at the end pawl of the quay.
The size of the water area near the projected quays is determined by the requirement of safe
maneuvering of ships in limited water areas with quays on one side.
At the full projected capacity, the average number of LNG tankers entering to moor for loading
shall be 85-90 per year. The necessary throughput capacity of the approach ways with consideration
of bottom dredging works carried out during 2009-2010 within the framework of the Federal
program Development of transport in Russia (2010-2015) does not require expanding the available
sea water-ways.
. .
. .
1.3.7
The personnel of the Terminal for liquefying and loading of natural gas is territorially
divided into the personnel of the natural gas liquefying facility and the personnel of the mooring area.
The number of the manpower in the Terminal is comprised of the managerial personnel and
workers. The total number of the manpower is 93.
Besides of the Terminal personnel proper, there shall be other personnel present, such as state
supervising services for border, customs, immigration, sanitary, veterinary and phytology
supervision. Personnel of the State Inspectorate for Port Supervision (SIPS) shall also be present. The
total number of personnel for these services shall be determined according to the initial data provided
by the corresponding organizations for design works.
The number of the operating personnel at the Terminal shall be changing according to the stage
of the project development.
Stage 1. Preparation, launching and probationary operation
Prior to commissioning of the equipment, a permanent unit shall be established, with the task
of preparation for commissioning and further regular operation (developing plans and procedures,
control systems and initial organization).
Stage 2. Operation during the first years
By the end of the probationary period, the personnel will have acquired the necessary
experience and will need less assistance from the supervisors; therefore, the labor productivity and
quality shall improve. As a result, the required number of manpower will decrease.
Stage 3. Finalizing the development project
Finalizing the development project and stabilizing the personnel numbers shall be achieved in
3...5 years upon launching.
The approximate male/female personnel ration is 82/18.
The source of managerial and engineering personnel is Vyborg and Saint-Petersburg.
Besides the premises for the personnel of the Terminal itself, there shall be those for the State
services supporting the operation of the Terminal.
The cargo turn-over of the sea Terminal shall be 660 thousand tons of liquefied natural gas
(LNG) per year.
The terminal shall be operating during all seasons, at least 330 days per year.
The ships turnover of the sea terminal is carried out according to the method recommended in
the directive document DD 31.3.01.01-93 Guidelines for Technological Design of Sea Ports.
The maximum possible number of ships entering the port during a year is conditioned by:
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
21
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is a cryogenic liquid, a mixture of hydrocarbons of the range
110 and nitrogen, with the dominating share of methane (0.850.99), colorless and odorless,
with the boiling point about -160 (111.7 ) under the atmospheric pressure, density 430-480
kg/m3.
LNG is derived from natural gas by the method of cryogenic cooling. By its physical nature, it
is still the natural gas, but in a different aggregate state liquid. During liquefying, the volume of
natural gas is decreased by more than 600 times. LNG is almost twice as light as gasoline; it is not
toxic; chemically inactive; there is less carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxide in its product of
combustion than in the product of combustion of compressed natural gas due to better purification
during liquefying. Sea transporting of LNG is carried out in specialized LNG tankers.
As LNG is converted to the gaseous state (re-gassed), its properties comply with those of the
pipeline-transportable natural gas acc. to GOST 5542-87.
The basic properties of liquefied natural gas acc. to TS 51-03-03-85 Combustible Natural
Liquefied Gas. Fuel for Internal Combustion Engines are presented in Table 1.3.3.
Table 1.3.3 - Basic properties of LNG acc. to TS 51-03-03-85
Component
Methane
Ethane
Propane and heavier hydrocarbons
Nitrogen
Odorant (ethyl mercaptan), not more than
Minimum combustion heat (under 0 and 101.325 kPa),
MJ/m3 (kcal/kg)
. .
. .
1.3.9
% (volumetric)
92 6.0
4.0 3.0
2.5 2.5
1.5 1.5
0.005
Test method
35.2 (11500)
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
22
. .
.
. .
Projecting of the networks leading to the KTP is carried out by the Customer along a separate
project that provides for two cable lines rated at 10 kV for LNGC NGVRCS (NGV-refueling
compressor station) for category 2 reliability class power supply with the capacity 995 kW.
For category 1 users, the project provides for diesel-generator power supply unit with the
capacity 1440 kW.
Water supply system
Water is used for the following purposes in this facility:
one of the working media in the production cycle;
heating;
household purposes.
As the source of fresh water for the Terminal, the projects provides for water collection from
the Gulf of Finland.
III category of water supply system is stipulated.
Technical solutions are developed in accordance with the effective Russian norms.
The water from water collection points is supplied to:
the facility for treatment and storage of de-mineralized water, with further supply to
technological facilities;
the facility for treatment of fresh water, with further supply to the distribution systems of
drinking and industrial water.
Water collection for fire water replenishment is better carried out from the Gulf of Finland A
dedicated water collection point shall be constructed for this purpose.
According to preliminary calculation, permanent water supply is provided for:
de-mineralized water production 80 m3/day;
drinking water system 300 m3/day;
technical water system 200 m3/day;
Total: 2580 m3/day.
Water collection and treatment system is rated for 0.01 m3/second.
Return water system is used for cooling technological equipment.
Three water supply systems are planned: industrial water supply, household water supply and
fire water supply.
Water is treated at the drinking water treatment station; its equipment is located in a container
(block module) sized 9.2 2.5 2.5 (h) m.
Water is supplied to the drinking water tank and then pumped to the household water supply
pipeline.
Water consumption for internal fire-fighting is 15 l/second (2 jets 5 l/second each plus 5
l/second) in accordance with SNiP 2.04.01-85*.
Water consumption for external fire-fighting is 50 l/second (40 l/second plus 10 l/second) in
accordance with SNiP 2.04.02.02-84*.
Total water consumption for fire-fighting is 65 l/second.
Fire-fighting water is supplied to the fire water supply pipeline from the pump house of the sea
water collection point for fire-fighting water supply.
Water discharge system
In all the sites of the terminal separate sewage systems are provided for: household, industrial
and rain water.
Household, industrial, rain (snow melt) water are directed to sewage water treatment facilities.
Sewage water is treated according to mechanical and biological treatment methods. Maximum
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
23
allowable concentrations of pollution after treatment is within the norms for water discharge into
water bodies in accordance with SanPiN 2.1.5.980-00.
The treatment facilities for household sewage receive household sewage water from sanitary
equipment and industrial sewage water from traps in heating units. Maximum allowable
concentrations of pollution in household sewage water are: suspended matter - 300 mg/l; BOD20 ~
100 mg/l; ammoniacal nitrogen =35 mg/l; phosphates -15 mg/l.
Rain water treatment facilities receive rain and snow melt water from water collection wells.
Pollution concentration in rain water is: suspended matter 500-2000 mg/l, oil products 10-30 mg/l.
Treatment of household and rain water in water treatment facilities shall be carried out in
several independent flows.
Water treatment facilities shall have a preliminary treatment unit combining traditional and
new patented technologies.
Average hourly throughput capacity of water treatment facilities shall be at least:
for industrial-rain sewage 15.5 m3/hour;
for household sewage 0.5 3/hour.
Anticipated pollutants content in industrial-rain sewage water is as follows:
oil products 20-150 mg/l;
emulsible oil products from 2 to 5 mg/l;
suspended matter 100 mg/l.
The quality of treated sewage is described in Table 1.3.4.
Table 1.3.4 - Quality of treated sewage water
Treated sewage water
Meas.unit
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
Value
. .
. .
Suspended matter
BOD total
COD
Ammoniacal nitrogen
Nitrogen in nitrites
Nitrogen in nitrates
Phosphates
SSAS
Oil products
Dissolved oxygen
Qnty
6.5...8.5
3.0
3.0
30.0
0.4
0.02
7.0...8.0
0.5
0.1
0.05
4.0
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
24
Industry
source of
sewage water
KOU-50BIO;
biological
treatment
Household
activity of
personnel
KOU-10D;
mechanical
treatment
Territory of
LNGC and
mooring zone
Throughput
capacity of
water treatment
facility, m3/day.
70
114
Treatment efficiency
Pollution concentration,
mg/l
Pollutant
Before
After
treatment
treatment
Suspended matter
300
3
BOD20
100
3
Ammoniacal
35
0.4
nitrogen
Phosphates
15
0.2
Suspended matter
1250
3
Oil products
20
0.05
% of
treatment
Destination of
treated
sewage water
99
97
98
98
99.7
Disinfection
unit;
Discharge to
the sea.
99.7
After treatment at KOU-50BIO and KOU-10D units (or their analogues), the treated and
filtered water is disinfected with ultraviolet rays in a disinfection unit with the specter 253.7 mm,
penetrating the depth of water and eliminating the remaining microorganisms.
Discharge of treated sewage waters is carried out in spreading over the sea water area.
Characteristics of pollutants in treated waters as they are discharged into the bay Bolshaya
Pikhtovaya (with consideration of requirement applied to fishing water bodies) are presented in Table
1.3.6.
Table 1.3.6 Characteristics of pollutants in treated waters discharged into the bay Bolshaya
Pikhtovaya
. .
. .
Pollutants in sewage
waters
Hazard class
Dry sediment
4
COD
4
General nitrogen
General phosphor
2. Toxic substances LHI
General iron
4
Ammoniacal nitrogen
4
Nitrogen in nitrites
3. Sanitary-toxic substances LHI
Sulphates
4
Chlorides
4
Nitrogen in nitrates
ASAS
4
4. Fishing waters substances LHI
Oil products
3
Sanitary group substances
Phosphates
4*
* - moderate
W/calc.
MPC, fishing
water bodies
Ratio of pollutants
concentration in the
discharged treated
water to MPC
2
5
7.5
50
20
1.5
1
3
10
6.5-8.5
1000
30
12
1.5
0.02
0.12
0.01
0.1
0.39
0.02
0.2 MPC
0.3 MPC
0.5 MPC
20
25
0.2
0.01
100
300
9.1
0.1
0.2 MPC
0.1 MPC
0.02 MPC
0.1 MPC
0.05
0.05
MPC
0.2
0.2
MPC
Notes
Strict adherence to environment regulations implies total prevention of sewage spills into water
bodies. In order to achieve this, normal operation shall be ensured for the facilities and equipment
related to collecting and transporting sewage waters.
In order to prevent emergency spills, the project provides for directing any sewage water from
the object to water treatment facilities.
N order to prevent environment pollution with sewage water, the following is provided for:
installing water-proof coating on access roads and parkings;
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
25
. .
.
. .
constructing sewage pipes for collecting and transporting sewage waters and prevention of
emergency spills;
laying of underground sewage pipes onto packed foundation with thorough packing of pipe
joints and collecting wells;
hydro-insulation and packing of underground facilities preventing sewage waters from
flowing out.
Heat supply system
The project provides for heat supply of the buildings where the personnel is permanently
present. Heat supply is provided by a dedicated heat center, where heat is taken from the GPU
generating electric power for the Terminal. In order to cover the peak loads, peak boilers are installed
in the power-generating facility. Heat supply for buildings of technological units is carried out by
utilizing heat emissions from equipment.
For heating the buildings where personnel is permanently present (ABC, LNG LF, OPRU,
MST, GRZ, PPT and PS, PD), the project provides for two-pipe dead-end heating system with lateral
and bottom connection of heating devices. As heating devices (steel radiators Purmo Ventil Compact
with lateral connection are projected.
The heat-carrier agent temperatures: direct +80, reverse +60. Dunfoss valves and fittings
shall be installed.
The project provides for installing impelled airflow units with plate-type heat recuperators.
Units have conventional water intake through outdoor gratings on the faade of the building. In order
to prevent backflow on intake and discharge outlets, return valves are installed. Air from toilets and
shower rooms is carried out with ceiling ventilators.
Air to the boiler room is by natural flow through air intake grating.
Gas supply system
Gas pipeline branch from the trunk gas pipeline Leningrad-Vyborg-State border
Transporting natural gas to the specialized terminal shall be carried out via pipes of the gas
pipeline branch (GPB) from the trunk gas pipeline Leningrad-Vyborg-State border.
The composition of the GPB includes:
trunk gas pipeline (diameter 530 mm, operating pressure 5.4 MPa, length 41277 m) from
the connecting point to the existing trunk gas pipeline Leningrad-Vyborg-State border-1 and 2 to
the projected LNGC near the peninsula Ruevelanniemi port Vyssotsk;
launching chamber of water treatment units (LCWTU) - 6090 m;
loops over water bodies of the Gulf of Finland - 3 pcs;
receiving chamber of water treatment units (RCWTU) - 6090 m;
cathode protection station (CPS) - 3 pcs;
electric chemical protection cables (ECP) with anode ground connection (3 pcs);
hoist crane blocks site (HB) - 66 m;
power supply lines VL - 6 kV for projected HB, LCWTU (2 pcs - 4500 m, 505 m);
approach motor roads to projected HB, LCWTU, RCWTU (6 pcs 150 m, 1600 m, 3000
m, 550 m, 150 m, 600 m).
Project documentation provides for complex protection from soil-induced erosion for projected
GPB of LNGC. In accordance with the calculations for the entire length of the GPB to LNGC, three
cathode protection stations shall be constructed.
In the sites of LCWTU, RCWTU and HB, the following is projected:
power supply with commercial electricity meters;
tele-mechanical equipment;
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
26
. .
.
. .
lighting protection;
protective ground connection;
fire and security alarm system;
complex of engineering-technical means of security (ETMS) with access control system;
technological access road and turning area for road transport;
area development and greenery.
Gas pipeline branch track
The GPB track is laid in the territories of Goncharov rural, Soviet urban and Vyssotsk urban
residential areas of Vyborg region of Leningrad district over the lands of the following categories:
Area of the State forest region of the North-Western and Roshino forest administrations;
Agricultural areas of AIC Matrosovo;
-Agricultural areas of AIC Kirov transport worker;
Industrial, power supply zone and transport land of OJSC RZhD, Motor road committee of
Leningrad district and Federal administration of motor roads;
Areas of the water administration of the Federal water resources agency;
undivided lands in the State ownership (municipal lands of Vyborg region of Leningrad
district).
As the track for the gas pipeline branch was selected, the following was considered:
optimal zoning and use of territory;
positioning near the existing transport routes (gas pipeline branch to MDS Vyborg
cellulose, technological communication cable etc.);
optimal (shortest) technological, transport and engineering connections;
minimum distance to the projected GPB (acc. to Table 4 of SNiP 2.05.06-85*).
He projected gas pipeline is parallel to the existing gas pipeline branch to MDS Vyborg
cellulose, 20 m to the left if seen along the gas flow.
The GPB track crosses the following communication lines and natural obstacles:
water bodies: small rivers (Perovka, Cherkasovka, Dryoma, Matrosovka, Medyanka),
Tokarev creek, 5 nameless creeks, a network of ameliorative ditches and three bays of the Gulf of
Finland (nameless bay, Malaya Pikhtovaya bay, Bolshaya Pikhtovaya bay);
motor roads: unpaved w/o category, road of regional significance of technical category IV,
road of federal significance of technical category I -181 Scandinavia;
railroad tracks 5 crossings;
power supply lines of OJSC LenEnergo and FSK EES of Russia.
The width of the land assignment band for the gas pipeline branch with the diameter 530 mm
is:
33 m for agricultural areas;
23 m for non-agricultural areas and areas of the State forestry administration (CN 45273).
Laying the GPB track acc. to one variant causes cession of lands in the protection and sanitary
zones of projected lines with cadastre numbers 47:01:0000000:50, 47:01:0000000:89 and
47:01:0000000:90 agricultural areas of AIC Matrosovo, AIC Kirov transport worker. The
project stipulates compensation to these business entities for laying the GPB.
The total approximate land area for the gas pipeline branch in the territory of Vyborg region is
127.43 ha, including:
within the borders of the lands of the forestry administration 104.6 ha;
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
27
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
28
. .
. .
Capital repairs of seawalls will be performed within the confines of the Vyborg Bay the
largest among the second order bays in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland.
Bottom configuration in this part of the Gulf of Finland is extremely rugged. A large number of
banks, reefs, littoral and insular shelves. The Vyborg Bay is separated from the Gulf of Finland by an
underwater shelf and occupies an area of 450 km2. The Bays upper part is shallow, below the town
of Vysotsk the depths grow significantly, and reach 30 m in the open part.
The Vyborg Bay basin is divided into three parts: upper, middle, and lower.
The upper part is separated from the middle part by a chain of islands, which includes
Vysotsky Island in the south, which forms the Bolshaya Pikhtovaya creek. The area of this region
from the confluence of the Saimaa Channel to the angle towards Sovetsky locality - Podborovie
locality equals 110 km2, prevailing depths 3.5-4.0 m, exclusive of deep water areas adjacent to the
ship channel. Insulosity approaches 21%.
Middle part: Its upper border spreads from the angle Sovetsky Podborovie to the angle
between Pribylovo locality and the foreland northward of Baltiets bay, its lower border along the
Kiperort peninsula across Vikhrevoi island, and aligns with the natural most narrow part of the basin
(6 km wide). Basin area - 160 km2, prevailing depths up to 10 m, max - 12-18 m, insulosity 16%.
Lower part and the adjacent continental shore of the area of Bjorkesund strait. Lower
part begins from angle Pribylovo Baltiets to angle between Gudonovka locality and Krestovy
foreland. The area of the basin is 120 km2, length of coastline - 50 km, prevailing depths of 25-30 m,
insulosity 2%.
The basin of the Vyborg Bay is highly desalinated due to confluence of multiple freshwater
flows into its head, the largest of which is the Saimaa Canal.
As throughout the Gulf of Finland, the Vyborg Bay is characterized by cyclonic flows, with sea
water moving from west to east mainly along the southern coast, and desalinated flows - from east to
west, mostly along the north shore.
Climate in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland, which applies to the Vyborg Bay, has the
features of marine temperate latitudes. It is characterized by relatively warm, yet long winter, with
rapid changes in temperature, including thaw. Spring is relatively cold with frequent night frosts.
Summer is relatively cool, often with heavy rainfalls. Autumn is quite warm with considerable
amount of clouds and drizzling rainfall.
Air Temperature
Average annual temperature is 4.2 , the warmest month is July, with an average monthly
temperature of 17.6 , and the coldest month is February (minus 9.4 ).
This area is characterized by abrupt changes from cold weather to thaws. On average,
December has 16 days with thaw, in January - 8 days, in February - 5 days.
The air temperature increase during thaws may reach 8-9 .
Air Humidity
Due to prevailing marine air masses humidity in the Vyborg Bay is high all year round. The
number of days with relative humidity of 80% is 140-155 days over the entire basin.
Cloud Amount
The average total monthly amount of cloud varies throughout the year from 5 to 8 points, and
reaches 9 points only in some areas in November and December. The highest amounts of clouds are
observed from October to February.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
29
The average annual number of cloudy days (cloud amount 8-10 points) on the coast ranges
mostly from 190 to 220. The most frequent cloudy days from October to February, when their
average monthly number is 13-26. From April to September, the number of cloudy days in most
areas 4-12.
Sunny days (cloud amount 0-2 points) are few with annual average of 22 to 74.
Precipitations
Precipitations are observed on average 191 days a year. Important characteristic of
precipitations is their intensity. In the cold season heavy precipitations are predominant, and their
average intensity is 0.2-0.4 mm / hr.
In the summer average intensity grows to 1.1-1.3 mm / hr due to rain showers.
Atmospheric Effects
Fogs are a not infrequent at the Vyborg Bay. Fogs are observed 40-45 days per year. Most
often fogs are observed in spring and autumn. Fogs are most rarely observed in the period from
May/June to August. For area described is characterized by advective, radiation and evaporation
fogs.
Average duration of fog over the bay is 4-6 hours and a maximum 50-60 hours. Haze is often
observed over the sea in the winter time.
Thunderstorms in the Vyborg Bay are relatively infrequent. Average annual number of days
with thunderstorms varies from 10 to 19.
The most intense storm activity is observed in July and August. In summer thunderstorms are
usually accompanied by heavy showers and squalls, and in winter - with snowfalls.
Wind Conditions
Southwestern, western and southern winds prevail over the Vyborg Bay. Their repeatability on
average is over 50%, winds of these directions are the most violent.
Average monthly wind speed is 3-7 m / s everywhere, and in autumn and winter it is greater
than in spring and summer. In summer the coast experiences well marked diurnal variation of wind
speed. As a rule, the lowest wind speed is observed at night and in the morning, and the highest in the
afternoon. Tables 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 show statistical evaluation of wind conditions according to HMS
Vyborg.
Table 2.1.1 Repeatability of wind direction and no-wind conditions, (%)
. .
. .
Month
1
4
7
10
Year
N
11
7
12
10
10
NE
13
15
18
8
14
E
11
10
9
7
10
SE
11
12
5
10
10
S
14
14
9
11
11
SW
23
32
29
26
28
W
8
4
9
16
8
NW
9
6
9
12
9
No wind
5
7
5
7
6
I
26.2
48.9
17.1
7.3
0.5
0
II
30.9
50.4
13.4
4.8
0.6
0
III
27.4
51.1
15.9
5.1
0.4
0
IV
26.7
54.2
16
2.9
0.2
0
V
19.4
56.6
20.6
3.1
0.2
0
VI
20.4
58.5
18.2
2.7
0.2
0
VII
26.7
56.4
14.8
1.9
0.2
0
VIII
26.9
57.2
13.8
2.1
0.1
0
IX
26.1
51.1
17.9
4.5
0.3
0.1
X
18.4
53.9
21
6.1
0.6
0
XI
18
53.6
21.2
6.5
0.7
0
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
XII
22.5
51.9
19.5
5.9
0.2
0
Year
24.1
53.6
17.4
4.4
0.35
0.01
30
Ice Formation
Main types of ice formation are glaze storm, frost and complex deposits with sleet.
During the season (October-April) there is an average of 31 days with ice formation of all
types, maximum number of such days was observed in 1959-1960 and lasted for 57 days. The most
frequently observed icing takes place in December-February, reaching an average of 10 days per
month in January.
Continuous icing period normally comprises 9 hours, frost - 20 hours, complex deposits - 37
hours.
The main climatic characteristics according to State Institution "St. Petersburg CGMS-R"
(Appendix C) are shown in Table 2.1.3.
Table 2.1.3 Climatic conditions in the area of the Terminal
Denomination
Coefficient depending on the stratification of the atmosphere, A
Terrain coefficient
Average maximum outdoor temperature of the hottest month of the year,
Average temperature of the coldest month,
Average annual wind rose, %
N
NE
E
SE
S
SW
W
NW
Wind speed, repeatability of values above which according to long-term data equals 5%, m/s
Value
160
1
21.7
-8.0
11
11
11
9
16
20
11
11
7.0
. .
Contaminant
Suspended substances
Sulfur dioxide
Carbon monoxide
Nitrogen dioxide
Background concentration
mg/m3
0.14
0.011
1.8
0.056
Shares of MAC
0.28
0.02
0.36
0.28
MAC
mg/m3
0.5
0.5
5
0.2
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
31
gravelly sand (EGE 1a) are presented locally, gray with fragments of wood, medium
density addition, water-saturated, layer thickness 0.5-1.6 m;
gravel soils with sandy filler, with the inclusion of pebbles, gravel, boulders, dense and
medium density addition, water-saturated (EGE 1b).
Recent marine sediments - bottom grounds (mlV) lie directly from the bottom of the basin:
silt loam and sandy loam (EGE 2a) - dark gray to black in color, contain significant
amounts of organic matter. At the top of the bed are fluid, lower - in soft plastic state. Thickness 0.31.5 m;
sands of different grain sizes (EGE 2b) - mainly of silt and fine differences, usually gray,
micaceous sands contain gravel-pebble material in various amounts of rare inclusions of up to 50%
or more of the total volume of soil. Thickness varies from 1 to 7.5 m and more.
Postglacial glaciolacustrine sediments (lglll):
clay, loam belt light brown, blue-gray and gray with heavy brown tint (EGE 3a).
Characterized by thin layering, texture very soft plastic or fluid, thixotropic, highly adhesive.
sandy loam belt (EGE 3b) gray with layers of sand, plastic, thixotropic. Layer thickness
0.8 to 4.2 m
silty sands (EGE 3C) gray and brownish-gray with layers of loam and sandy loam,
medium density structure, water-saturated. Thickness 1.0 to 15.5 m
Postglacial fluvioglacial deposits (fill):
gravelly sandy loam (IGE 4a) - brown heterogeneous in composition, characterized by
dense, medium density structure, water-saturated, thickness up to 4.3 m;
detrital soils (EGE 4b), gravel bottoms (EGE 4d), block-detrital (EGE 4d) with sand
filling contain inclusions of pebbles, gruss, gravel, boulders, mixed composition, characterized by
dense structure, water-saturated. Thickness 0.5 to 12.5 m.
Upper Proterozoic formations (PR3):
granites, granite-gneisses pinkish-gray and reddish-brown, fissured, weathered, medium
solid (EGE 5) lie at the base of the section under consideration, as bedding for quaternary deposits.
Top is very uneven, sometimes lies close to bottom surface. Minus 9.3 - minus 22.6 below sea level.
2.4 Hydrology
. .
Level
Sea level fluctuations in the area, of mostly non-recurrent surging nature resulting from
occurring synoptic processes. Periodic (tidal) fluctuations are much smaller in magnitude than the
non-recurrent and are of not practical importance.
Level rises occur mainly under the influence of western bearing winds, and reduction - under
the influence of eastern bearing winds.
Level of 50% occurrence per year features mark minus 3 cm, 90% occurrence - minus 35 cm,
95% - minus 45 cm, 98% - minus 57 cm.
. .
Hydrological regime of the Vyborg Bay and the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland as a whole
are influenced by the processes of interaction of the aquatic environment with the atmosphere, land,
open part of the Gulf of Finland and the Baltic Sea.
The main characteristics of hydrology in the basin under consideration are:
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
32
Average level
Maximum level
Minimum level
II
-9
136
-117
III
-15
116
-114
IV
-12
93
-116
Y
-19
91
-107
YI
-7
95
-86
YII
7
109
-77
YIII
4
147
-63
IX
10
164
-84
X
13
164
-114
XI
21
164
-102
XII
19
174
-113
Year
1
174
-117
Table 2.4.2 Frequency of occurrence of sea level gradations (), 1965-1990 (%)
Level, cm
150..159
140..149
130..139
120..129
110..119
100..109
90..99
80..89
70..79
60..69
50..59
40..49
30..39
20..29
Vyborg
Level, cm
10..19
0..9
-1.. -10
-11..-20
-21..-30
-31..-40
-41..-50
-51..-60
-61..-70
-71..-80
-81..-90
-91..-100
-101..-110
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.07
0.19
0.48
0.82
1.63
3.22
4.4
5.9
Vyborg
10,11
12.85
16.87
15.88
12.01
7.63
4.10
2.21
1.04
0.31
0.1
0.07
0.03
Min
-117
Max
174
. .
. .
Disturbance
Average height of wind waves, 3% occurrence at Vyborg station in spring-summer does not
exceed 0.25 m; in November and December - does not exceed 0.4 m. Maximum height of wind
waves, 3% occurrence was recorded during July-September, and in December, when it reached 1.8
m.
Tables 2.4.4 - 2.4.5 show statistical evaluation of level regime according to HMS Vyborg.
Table 2.4.4 Repeatability of wind wave height, 3% occurrence (%)
Height, m
I
II
III
IV
Y
0 .. 0.5
ice
ice
ice
98.5
98.4
0.6 .. 1.0
1.5
1.6
1.1 .. 1.5
0.0
0.0
1.6 .. 2.0
0.0
0.0
Note: 0.0 in the tables stands for occurrence below 0.05 %.
YI
98.7
1.3
0.0
0.0
YII
97.9
2.0
0.1
0.0
YIII
98.7
1.1
0.2
0.0
IX
95.9
4.0
0.1
0.0
X
95.9
4.0
0.1
0.0
XI
91.6
8.2
0.2
0.0
XII
91.5
6.1
2.4
0.0
1
0
5
0.05
10
0.1
25
0.2
50
0.3
75
0.5
90
0.6
95
0.65
99
0.7
Currents
Main role in the formation of the pattern of currents in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland is
played by wind currents, currents caused by long waves, discharge currents and tidal currents.
Wind currents in the Baltic Sea and the Gulf of Finland are developing in the upper layer to the
summer thermocline (20-30 m) and to winter halocline (60-70 m) forced by wind on the water
surface. The deeper the water, the slower these currents grow quickly.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
33
For the area under consideration maximum repeatability characterizes the north, north-east and
south, south-west currents with a speed under 10 cm / s. The average current speed is about 15 cm / s,
and maximum equals 72 cm / s.
Evaluation of repeatability of currents in the surface layer based on the data of short-term
observations is provided in Tables 2.4.6-2.4.7.
Table 2.4.6 - Repeatability of current speed and direction by gradations (%)
Speed
0
<10
11-20
21-30
31-40
41-50
51-75
Repeatability.
Maximum
speed, cm/s
NE
SE
SW
NW
8.0
6.6
2.0
1.9
1.1
6.9
3.6
1.4
0.9
1
0.8
0.5
3.5
1.6
0.1
0.1
8.0
4.9
2.8
1.7
1.4
1.5
20.3
4.0
1.2
1
0.2
0.2
6.6
3.1
1.1
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.1
5.6
Total
4.7
42.9
27.4
11.7
6.9
3.8
2.6
100.0
72
48
71
72
19.6
0.3
13.1
2.6
5.1
8.4
7.6
3.2
1.8
0.5
0.7
22.2
50
54
42
56
72
0.3
Repeatability %
4.7
42.9
27.4
11.7
6.9
3.8
2.6
15
72
Ice Regime
Ice regime of the area is determined by its geographical position, climatic conditions, depth and
bottom configuration, desalination of waters under the influence of shore flow, the intensity of heat
exchange with the open part of the Gulf of Finland, water circulation.
Ice in the Vyborg Bay is formed annually. Ice formation begins from shallow water and
protected areas and develops throughout the basin of the bay. Vyborg Bay features early formation of
ice and steady ice cover.
Thickness of ice during its maximum development period varies largely from year to year.
Maximum ice thickness near the shore equaled nearly 80 cm, in the open part of the port near
Vysotsk 70 cm. Average ice thickness during its maximum development period equals 40-60 cm.
Ice cover thickness usually reaches its maximum in march, and in the severe winter in early April
Information on dates of ice regime phases, and the basic elements of ice regime according to
HMS Vyborg are given in Table 2.4.8.
. .
. .
Currents, developing under the influence of flow from Saimaa Canal, long waves and tides,
mild in the work area due to being closed and relatively shallow. Essentially its development is
observed along axis of the shipping channel entering the port area in the form of reverse water
exchange currents of the open sea with the Vyborg Bay.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
34
Table 2.4.8 Information on dates of ice regime phases and basic elements of ice regime
Characteristic
Ice formation
Date of steady transition of air temperature under 0 in autumn
Date of first ice formation
Date of steady ice formation
Date of first formation of shore ice or land ice
Full freezing
Date of early steady land ice formation
Steady ice formation width, km
Maximum land ice width, km
Date of first full freezing
Date of final freezing
Maximum measured ice thickness, cm
Date of observation of maximum ice thickness
Melting and decay
Date of steady transition of air temperature over 0 in spring
Date of meltwater puddle formation
Date of thaw hole formation
Date of water coast formation
Date of breaking or first advance of land ice formation
Deicing
Date of final decay of land ice
Date of first full deicing
Date of final deicing
Number of days with ice during the ice period
Early dates
Medium
dates
Later dates
18.10
29.10
6.11
3.11
19.11
20.11
25.11
25.11
28.12
9.12
26.12
26.12
6.11
12.0
12.0
4.11
12.11
38
20.02
30.11
12.0
12.0
29.11
5.12
58
14.03
27.12
12.0
12.0
31.12
9.01
71
1.04
5.03
10.04
26.03
3.04
7.03
25.03
29.03
17.04
17.04
12.04
12.04
20.04
4.05
28.04
27.04
17.04
18.04
19.04
123
30.04
2.05
2.05
157
9.05
9.05
9.05
180
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
35
But the population of the roach, the perch, the ruff is not subjected to such considerable migrations
and their habitation is associated with the local biotopes. Due to this reason, influence of
anthropogenic factor on them also varies. July is the peak of the summer season with stably high
temperatures and weak mixing of water. This determines dominance of the fish of the fresh water
complex in this desalted part of the Gulf, that was confirmed by conducted research. All the above
species are fresh water and typical inhabitants of this area.
During research in the area of dredging and blasting operations near the island of Vysotsky in
2005, there were representatives of 9 species in the takes belonging to 4 families (Table 2.5.1).
In the course of two seasons, three species prevailed in the composition of fish fauna both by
number and biomass, i.e. the perch, the roach and the silver bream (Tables 2.5.2 and 2.5.3). In the
beginning of summer, the considerable share was that of the ruff, in autumn the Baltic herring
approaches were observed.
Table 2.5.1 - Species composition of ichtyofauna in the Gulf of Vyborg in the area of dredging
and blasting operations near the island of Vysotsky in 2004-2005
Fam. Gasterosteidae
Clupea harengus membras (L.)
Fam. Cyprinidae
Rutilus rutilus (L.)
Blicca bjorkna (L.)
Abramis brama (L.)
Alburnus alburnus (L.)
Fam. Percidae
Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)
Percafluviatilis (L.)
Gymnocephalus cernua (L.)
Fam. Esoxidae
Esox lucius (L.)
Fam. Herring
Baltic herring
Fam. Chubs
The roach
The silver bream
The bream
The bleak
Fam. Perch
The pike perch
The perch
The ruff
Family Pickerel
The pike
Season dynamics is registered in quantitative indices of fish cenosis which is associated with
spawning and feeding fish migration, and also year-to-year variations stipulated by fish number
dynamics.
Table 2.5.2 - Number (N, specimen/ha and biomass (B, kg/ha) of fish in the area of scheduled
dredging and blasting operations as per data of 2004
. .
. .
Species of fish
The perch
The pike perch
The ruff
The roach
The silver bream
The bleak
The bream
The pike
The Baltic herring
Total
June
N
829
92
1971
147
304
28
26.6
12.6
27.4
3.5
6.7
0.5
9
28
3407
1.4
0.5
79.2
July
N
175
212
203
239
783
7.9
32.9
2.3
9.1
8.5
1.1
1621
61.8
October
N
37
1.6
37
718
74
9
28
0.3
40.5
1.7
0.1
12.1
249
1152
3.6
59.9
In the course of growing season, high density of ichthyofauna is registered in this area. The
maximum density of ichthyofauna is observed in the early summer period, then it is smoothly
decreased by autumn.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
36
Table 2.5.3 - Number (N, specimen/ha and biomass (B, kg/ha) of fish in the area of scheduled
dredging and blasting operations near the island of Vysotsky in July 2004-2005.
July
N
1181
106
69
580
709
5
2650
Species of fish
The perch
The pike perch
The ruff
The roach
The silver bream
The pike
Total
50.3
25.8
0.8
13.4
10.0
1.4
101.7
Dimension and age-specific range of the dominant species, the perch, is wide. Two-year-olds
and three-year-olds prevail, making in all about 70% of the selection. Adults were registered with the
length of up to 21 cm at the age of 7 to 9 years, but their share is inconsiderable (Figure 2.1).
Figure 2.1 Length frequency of the perch takes in the area of scheduled dredging and
blasting operations in July 2005
. .
. .
Dimension and age-specific structure of the roach population is given by 6 age-specific classes
(from 2 to 7 years). Species of the age of 2 to 3 years with body length from 8 to 9 cm prevail,
though the share of four-year-olds with the length of 13 to 14 cm is not inconsiderable (about 25%)
(Figure 2.2).
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
37
Figure 2.2 Length frequency of the roach in the area of scheduled dredging and blasting
operations in July 2005
. .
. .
2.5.2
The main components of ecosystem, which provide reproduction of fish stock are brushing of
aquatic vegetation (macrophytes), planktonic water plants (phytoplankton), zooplankton and
zoobenthos.
Macrophytes serve as biotope in which the most productive littoral communities of plankton
and benthos develop. Brushing serves also as substrate for spawning of phytophilous fishes and
shelter for their young.
In the upper and in the middle part of the Gulf of Vyborg, aquatic vegetation occupies almost
all shallow water gulfs and bays and shallow waters around the islands. Flora is represented with
typically lake species. The most specific is brushing of the bulrush (Scirpus lacustris), the rush
(Phragmites australis), the white water lily (Nimphaea Candida), the candock (Nupphar lutea), the
cornstalk weeds (Potamogeton lucens), the clasping-leaved pondweed (P.perfoliatus) and the
tenchweed (P.natans), the arrowhead (Sagittaria sagittifolis). The latter two species are spread
mainly in river mouths.
In the lower part of the Gulf, where underwater ground disposal is located, macrophytes can be
come across along the western coast only. Here, phytobenthos (filamentous aglae and charophytes)
prevail, species of higher plants are registered in small quantities.
Phytoplankton in live condition makes the basis of food of peaceful zooplankton.
At the boundary of the upper part and the middle part of the Gulf of Vyborg, species specific
for shallow waters prevail in the composition of phytoplankton. In the course of the most part of the
growing season, the group of dominants is made of the blue-green algae (Limnothrix planctonica,
Planktothrix agardhii, Aphanizomenon flos-aquae) and the green (the Chlorococcales Scenedesmus
acuminatus and S.quadricauda). Apart from them the group of the mass usually includes class
species Lyngbya and Phormidium, and also specimen of the euglenales (class species
Trachelomonas) and the cryptophites formations (species p. Cryptomonas). Phytoplankton biomass
reaches at the period of maximum up to 9-11 g/m3, and makes in average 3 g/m3.
In the lower part of the Gulf, phytoplankton does not differ from the adjacent water area of the
open part of the Gulf of Finland as regards species composition and quantitative indices. Planktonic
algae biomass in average makes about 0.5 g/m3 with dominating blue-green algae (Planktothrix
agardhii, Limnothrix planctonica, liomphosphaeria lacustris, Nodularia spumigena) and unicellular
green algae (Pyramimonas).
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
38
. .
.
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
39
. .
.
. .
made with large species Cercopagis pengoi, Daphnia cucullata, Leptodora kindtii, Diaphanosoma
brahyurum.
In the area of approach channel, the numbers of zooplankton was within 17 to 35 thous.
specimen/m3 and made in average about 26 thous. specimen/m3. At this section, copepods
(Mesocyclops Eurytemora hirundoides) prevailed. The biomass of zooplankton varied from 0.6 to
0.8 g/m, 0.7 g/m in average, the basis of biomass was made by large species Cercopagis pengoi,
Daphnia cucullata .
In the area of underwater disposal, the numbers of zooplankton varied from 5 to 14 thous.
specimen/m3 and made in average about 8 thous. specimen/m3. Here, copepods prevailed by means
of development of copepod stages Eurytemora hirundoides. The biomass varied from 0.4 to 0.7 g/m
and made in average 0.5 g/m3, at that, its main part consisted of large species of copepods and
cladocerans (Eurytemora hirundoides, Limnocalanus grimaldii Cercopagis pengoi, Daphnia
cucullata).
Zoobenthos serves as food for the young of many species of fish and makes the basis for food
of full-grown fishes-benthos-eaters.
In the upper and in the middle part of the Gulf, the species composition of benthos is varied.
For the littoral area with poorly silted sands, presence of large shellfishes including conches (7
species with dominance of Theodoxus fluviatilis) and clams (M.Unionidae) is specific. Apart from
shellfish, larvae of chironomids (5 species), small oligochaetes, heleids (2 species), and also great in
number nematodes, osctracodes and water acarian are represented in zoobenthos. In more deep-water
sections, in comparison with shallow waters, zoobenthos is poor and represented with only
oligochaetes (Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri, Lumbriculus variegatus, Tubifex tubifex) and larvae of
chironomids (Procladius ferrugineus and Chironomus plumosus).
The numbers of zoobenthos during growing season makes from 0.68 to 1.6 thous.
specimen/m2, the overall biomass is from 1.06 to 313.4 g/m2, at that, up to 95% of biomass is
provided by shellfish. The average biomass of feed zoobenthos (without big shellfish) made about 8
g/m2 in the 1990-ies and in the latest years it has not exceeded 2 g/m2.
In the lower part of the Gulf, in the area of underwater ground disposal, zoobenthos is
practically unavailable. The biomass of bottom animals is usually less than 0.1 g/m with dominance
of oligochaetes.
In July 2005, the zoobenthos of the explored water area of the Gulf of Vyborg was extremely
poor by qualitative and quantitative indices.
In the area of Pihtovaya bay, zoobenthos was represented by oligochaetes, larvae of
chironomides, polychaetes, flat worms and nematodes. The numbers of zoobenthos varied from
station to station from 0.20 to 0.56 thous. specimen/m2, biomass, from 0.12 to 0.27 g/m2. In average
in the area, the quantitative indices made 0.33 thous. specimen/m3 and 0.16 g/m, accordingly. By
number and by biomass, oligochaetes prevailed.
In the area of the approach channel, zoobenthos consisted of oligochaetes and larvae of
chironomides (Procladius ferrugineus and Chironomus plumosus). The numbers varied from station
to station from 0.12 to 0.68 thous. specimen/m2, biomass, from 0.22 to 2.38 g/cm2, in average by the
area, the quantitative indices made 0.29 thous. specimen/m2 and 1.15 g/m2, accordingly. By number
and by biomass, larvae of chironomides prevailed.
In the area of underwater disposal, benthic communities differed by specific poverty,
zoobenthos was represented only with single oligochaetes and nematodes. The numbers of
macrozoobenthos varied from station to station from 0.04 to 0.12 thous. specimen/m2, biomass, from
0.01 to 0.06 g/m2. In average in the area, the quantitative indices made 0.09 thous. specimen/m 2 and
0.11 g/m2.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
40
. .
. .
The social infrastructure of Vysotsk urban settlement municipal unit of Leningrad Region is
represented with the following objects:
the Town Library of Vysotsk
the training base for additional education for children Art School for Children
the Municipal Budgetary Pre-school Establishment Borovichok kindergarten of the town
of Vysotsk
Secondary school named after S.J. Rostocky of the town of Vysotsk.
The following objects are located within the territory of the school of the town of Vysotsk:
Stanislav J. Rostocky's Museum
Municipal Educational Establishment for additional education for children Children's
Music School of Sovetsky Settlement
coteries of the Municipal Educational Establishment for additional education for children
Children's Centre of Arts
3 coteries of the Municipal Educational Establishment for additional education for children
Children's House of Arts
2 coteries of the Municipal Educational Establishment for additional education for children
Children's Sports Centre of the town of Kamennogorsk
1 coterie of the Municipal Educational Establishment for additional education for children
Young Naturalists' Station.
On the basis of these establishments, 12 amateur groups and 3 amateur unions work, also there
is a music group called Juice in the town. The Amusement Park of Vyborg, groups Veresk (the
Heather) and Elfs (the Elves) and entrepreneurs also take part in organising public events.
Despite the small size of the settlement, here, primary music, choreographic education,
teaching the basics of painting and drawing and theatrical arts are available for children. The Town
Library of Vysotsk, Youth Council under Chief Manager and Municipal Educational establishment
Evening School named after S.J. Rostocky.
Youth policy is a system of generation of priorities and measures aimed at creation of
conditions and possibilities for successful socialization and effective self-actualization of youth for
development of its potential to the benefit of the town and the country. The youth of Vysotsk actively
participates in all the spheres of the town life, economics, politics, socially important projects. From
2009, the Youth Council and the Young Guard of the United Russia party operate in the town, which
initiate many activities (competitions, disco parties, holidays) for children, teenagers and youth. The
town youth participates in activities dedicated to the Victory Day, and also in regional and district
activities. Much is made of employment of teenagers, young people and students in summer time.
With each year recreation at Vysotsk is becoming more and more popular. People from various
parts of Russia and neighbour states wish to get rest at Vysotsk. A lot of places of interest, fresh air,
clean environment, hospitable townsmen ready to help and accommodate vacationists - all this as a
whole makes pleasant atmosphere for many of those who have rest. Recreation at Vysotsk has gained
its popularity and contributes to development of the town and population which grows with every
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
41
year. Development of traffic, personnel skills, high population growth - all this is due to active rest at
Vysotsk which improves with each new season.
. .
. .
2.7
In accordance with the data of the Natural Resources Committee of Leningrad Region, there
are no specially protected natural territories in the area of location of the Terminal.
At a distance of about 4.6 km, there is the state geological natural monument of regional
importance called Ostrov Gustoy (the Island of Gustoy).
The geological natural monument of regional importance Ostrov Gustoy was established in
1976.
Location: Vyborgsky district of Leningrad Region, 2 km to the west of the town of Vysotsk
and 7 km to south-west of the city of Vyborg (Figure 2.3).
Area: 54 hectares.
Purpose of establishment: The territory has been declared natural monument to preserve unique
egresses of rapakivi granites and original land forms, the "cowstones".
Documents: The Decree of the Leningrad Region Government dated 26 December 1996 No.
494 (with amendments).
Short description
The Island of Gustoy is U-shaped. The eastern coast of the island is abrupt (the height of cliff is
about 20 m), that is associated with tectonic disturbance (horst). The north-western end of the island
is a granite rock with the height of up to 30 m and length about 500 m, smoothed with glacier, the
typical cowstones. In other areas, there are polished rocks on which surfaces one can clearly see big
ovoids - round crystals of field spar edged with crystals of quartz and mica typical for rapakivi
granites. A picturesque bay plunges into the central part of the island. This bay is a favourite berth
for yachtsmen. A combination of water space and numerous woody islands with rock masses,
cowstones, indented coast line, narrow and long gulfs - all this makes the most picturesque landscape
of skerries specific to the coast of northern Scandinavia and non-specific to any other areas of
Leningrad Region.
Specially protected objects: cowstones land forms, rapakivi granites.
Security mode restricting economic activity: the following is forbidden: mining and digging of
granite, building fires.
At a distance of about 2.5 km, there is the state natural complex reserved forest of regional
importance Vyborgsky.
The state natural complex reserved forest of regional importance Vyborgsky was established in
1976.
Location: Vyborgsky district of Leningrad Region, 10 km to the north of the town of Primorsk
at Kiperort peninsula and a group of islands in the Gulf of Vyborg (Figure 2.3).
Area: 11295 hectares, out of them 6940 hectares are water area of the Gulf of Finland.
Purpose of establishment:
Keeping rich and varied natural complex of the islands of the Gulf of Vyborg with rare species
of plants and animals, sections of maritime vegetation of Kiperort peninsula and big brushing in the
suburbs of the settlement of Kamenka of the amphiatlantic species of swamp gale located at the
eastern boundary of the areal, places of aquatic bird mass staging area in Klyuchevsky bay on spring
flight, spawning grounds of valuable food fish species, protection of landscape and plants of the
islands, rare species of plants and animals.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
42
. .
.
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
43
. .
.
. .
Documents: The Decree of the Leningrad Region Government dated 16 August 2004 No. 157.
Short description
The reserved forest is located at the southern end of the Baltic fundamental crystalline
formations and occupies the littoral part of the Gulf of Finland and the Gulf of Vyborg, the northern
part of Kiperort peninsula, the island of Lisyi, adjacent small islands. Undulating and horseback land
features distinct north-western orientation. The coastal line is strongly indented. On several islands
there are rocky egresses of granites (eskers). Pine forests prevail: with green moss, blackberry, red
billberry and blackberry, heather and batfish. Spruce forests are considerably rare. Msharas and bogs
are associated with lows including suffruticous-cottongrass-acid, meadow-acid bogs. On some
islands there are small areas of broad-leaved forests of oaks, ash-trees and lindens. Sticky alder
forests and maritime meadows are associated with coasts. Shallow-water backwashes and low coasts
overgrow with the rush and the reed. As to its floristic composition, sea banks and maritime
meadows with a complex of species (including the rare ones) of psammophilous and halophilous
plants are interesting. One can quite often see the moss fern which is more specific for the north of
Karelian Isthmus. Coastal shallow waters are places of spawning and feed of many species of fish:
the Baltic herring, the smelt, the cisco, the perch, the bream, the pike perch and the eel. Quite often
there are approaches of the Baltic bank cod and also other sea fish including the garfish, the
lumpfish, seldom of the herring-twaite shad. Of the amphibias, the crested newt is worth mentioning,
of the reptiles, the grass-snake, common for the littoral area of the gulf. The abundance of bird fauna
is associated with penetration of many species of maritime and near water birds of the central and
western parts of the Baltics, and also mass flight over this territory by planktonic and land migrants.
Out of rare species, the following were registered at nesting: the brant goose, the bluebill, the oyster
catcher, the herbalist, the turnstone, the dunlin, the seagull, the polar, the small and the black terns,
the Caspian tern. The shallow water area near Kiperort peninsula serves as a place of mass spring
staging area for the flight whooping swan and the tundra fish duck, the river duck and the diving
duck. Out of the latter, the most mass are the long-tail duck, the scoter, the velvet scoter, the bluebill,
the bullhead. Geese fly in big quantities, and also the brent goose and the barnacle goose, seagulls,
various species of snipes, the common crane, the Arctic loon and the red-throated loon, the greatcrested grebe and the red-necked grebe. Autumn migration of land birds is extremely intense
including the most part of species of sparrows, doves (ring doves, stock doves), peckers and owls.
Apart from ordinary species of mammals, here, several types of bats are registered, the great number
of which is due to their concentration on spring and autumn flights as well.
Protected objects and security mode
Specially protected objects of the modern land form piled by rocky materials, natural
complexes of Klyuchevskaya bay in the shallow water littoral area close to settlement Pribylovo and
in its northern part in the area of bank lands Hatsari, Runaluoto, Valtnuori, Hanninen, Pahokari as
places of staging areas and feeding of aquatic birds, big brushing of bog gales in the bay in the
suburbs of the settlement of Kamenka, large populations of the chive at the coast of Kiperort
peninsula, breeding colonies of birds, areas of coasts with complexes of littoral psammophilous and
littoral and water halophilous plants, rare species of plants and animals: the Valenberg's water
plantain, the chive, the dwarf cornel, the androgynous crowberry, the dyer's weed, the littoral
centaury, the sea aster, the maritime and the elder-leaved allheal, the dog's-mercury, Carex
pseudocyperus, the sea milkwort, the grass-snake, the pectinate newt, the lesser white-fronted goose,
the brant goose, the barnacle goose, the mute swan, all species of birds of prey and owls, all species
of bats, the European mink.
Security mode restricting economic activity:
The following is forbidden: bleeding; storage of bark residue; mushroom gathering, fruit
collection, seed harvesting, collection of crude drugs for commercial and industrial purposes; traffic
of motor transport excluding the one of fully formed highway network; parking of motor transport in
the water protection zone of the Gulf of Finland, but for specially allotted places; arrangement of
dumps, pollution of the territory and water area of the Gulf of Finland with waste and garbage; use of
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
44
small-sized motor vessels in the water area of Klyuchevskaya bay and around the islands of the Gulf
of Vyborg up to 5 meter isobatic curve, but for fishing vessels approaching the places where fixed
fishing gears are arranged; use of small-sized motor vessels in the water area of Klyuchevskaya bay
but for fairway from 15 April to 15 July; spring fowling; winter hunt with the use of traps and
poisoned jigs; stay at the places of migration staging areas and mass nesting of aquatic and near
water birds during migrations and breeding from 15 April to 15 July; building fires outside specially
equipped sites.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
45
Among ruderal plants, next to dyer's woad, grow curled thistle (Carduus crispus), cotton
burdock (Arctium tomentosum), felon herb (Artemisia vulgaris), snakeflower (Lamium album),
winter cress (Barbarea vulgaris), wild chervil (Anthryscus sylvestris).
Dwarf cornel. In the Leningrad Region it is mainly encountered on the Gulf of Finland beaches
and islands.
Sea aster. Obligatory halophilous species, in the Leningrad Region only grows on the Gulf of
Finland beaches and islands.
The main limiting factor in the area considered is beaches development, drain of coastal marsh,
pollution of the Gulf of Finland littoral part, trampling down.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
46
insular systems small capacity. All the Vyborg Bay islands have limited capacity with respect to both
cache and areas suitable for nidification. That is the reason of their special vulnerability from the
point of view of man-induced pressing. Transect data indicate that nidification density for most
terrestrial bird species is 2 to 3 times lower than that on the mainland.
Nidification of aquatic and semi-aquatic species is limited by the Vyborg Bay deep waters and
low food capacity. In the area of Vysotsky Island even in the areas overgrown with emergent
vegetation (mainly rush, quite often thinned) depths reach 1-1.5 metres which prevents dabbling duck
feeding. Macrophyte underbrush in numerous bays and straits is as a rule thinned, silts on shingly
rocky bottom are thin. On the whole, most favourable for natatorial nidification areas occupy small
territories (for example, between Vysotsky and Kozliny, Vysotsky and Svobodny Islands, coastline
and Tyoply, Vesenniy, Sennoi Islands. Such species of diving ducks-cavity nesters as bullhead and
common merganser cannot find old hollow trees on the islands. Semi-aquatic birds (first of all,
sandpipers) do not have enough open spaces (too tallgrass meadows, narrow and short strip of
shingly and sandy beaches), silty sandbanks. For sea gulls and terns, nidification is also limited by
insufficiency of dry land open space and depths (fishing difficulty). To some extent are exceptional
southern land tongues of Vysotsky Island (cape Karavai) and smaller islands (for example,
Gryadovy, Travny) or very small nameless accompanying luds available at nearly every small or
medium-size island.
Among important findings of new species is that of nesting common eider in the vicinity of
Bolshoi Vysotsky Island. Before, this goose barnacle species was only found breeding outside the
Vyborg Bay, in particular, on Tsepnoi, Bolshaya Otmel and Rondo Islands in Berezovykh
archipelago. This finding draws the breeding range area directly to Bolshoi Vysotsky Island.
Common eider is a very rare nesting species in the Russian part of the Baltic territory and Lake
Ladoga; the species is enlisted into Red Data Book of the Leningrad Region. As of today, on the
islands of the Gulf of Finland central and eastern parts and Ladoga north-west, nest 80 to150 pairs of
eider (Buzun, 2005). The species also extremely rarely pass the islands. In spring not more than 10
units of eider pass over the Vyborg Bay on the way to the north.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
47
island) that rare species of arctic migrants (looms, swans) are concentrated, or collect extraordinary
numbers of units of common species (for example, divers). One of the largest stops of whooping
swans and tundra swans is in close vicinity of Vysotsky Island, in the Bay of Samolanlakhti.
In May stop-overs break up or become short-termed and on/off-migration starts. Dabbling
ducks and diving-ducks covering small distances (for example, frying to the Ladoga, Karelia) form
small flocks in some enclosed bays and river estuaries, but such mixed flocks do not last long.
In autumn flying is mainly on/off type, natatorial stops, if any, are not numerous and do not
last long. As a rule, dozens of looms or dozens or hundreds of goose barnacle flock offshore.
Quantitatively Vysotsky Island locking the bay position results in the fact that over it and
close to it to the south or north of it - pass practically all birds migrating through the Vyborg Bay.
In some seasons, arctic natatorials can pass Vysotsky Island in quantities twice smaller than
usual, as on some not yet clear reasons part of the birds cross Karelian Isthmus southward or travel
via Finland. Another reason for numerosity drop may be birds survivability on wintering grounds or
parturiating on breeding grounds. These numerosity drops shall be accounted for as an essential part
of bird world population can suffer from unavailability of stop grounds.
As it was already mentioned above, autumn stopping grounds of migrant birds around
Vysotsky Island and adjacent islands are not diverse in what concerns both species composition and
number. Multitudes of birds approaching the island from the upper reaches of the Vyborg Bay pass
the island in transit. In August on its entire territory there can only be encountered some hundreds of
dabbling ducks (mainly, mallards and teals), in September the figure goes down to dozens of units.
Their main packings are formed in rush thickets between Vysotsky and Kozliny Islands, between
Vysotsky and Svobodny Islands, from Sovetsky to Sennoi Island, in river Gorokhovka estuary, in
Malaya Pikhtovaya bay and some other bays. A little more frequently in adjacent waters stop divingducks, especially goose barnacle. At the end of September in October in total up to five hundred
long-tailed ducks, black scoter, scoter, bluebill and bullheads crowd in open water 1 to 3 km to the
east of Vysotsky Island (on bench land Kukhaluoto and in the vicinity of Gryadovy Island), and to
the west of Vysotsky Island (in Bolshoy Tranzundsky roadstead). To the south of Vysotsky Island
there have been noticed small packings of tufted ducks and bluebills, bullheads. But these stops are
not durable. Whooping swans and tundra swans make short stops in the Bay of Samolanlakhti,
Klyuchevsky Bay and to the south-east of Lisy Island, i.e. on spring concentration grounds.
No dwelling places of Red Data Book plants or animals are present in the design area.
2.10
In Terminal design area, no historical or cultural monuments, objects of cultural heritage have
been found.
Mineral Resources
. .
. .
2.11
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
48
3.
. .
. .
Item
no.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Machinery, mechanisms or
processes
Bulldozer
Bulldozer
Tractor
Bus
Dump truck
Dump truck
Eight-wheel dump truck
Truck tractor
Tractor lorry
Road roller
Road motor roller
Wheel-mounted crane
Truck-mounted crane
Truck-mounted crane
Truck-mounted crane
Truck-mounted crane
Pipelayer crane
Crawler crane
Crawler crane
Truck-mounted hydraulic hoist
Lift truck
High sided truck
Concrete mixer truck
Brand or type
-170.41
DZ-42
-100
PAZ-672
KAMAZ-55111
KAMAZ-55111
KAMAZ-6540
KAMAZ-5460
KAMAZ-5410
DU
DU-3P
KS-4574
KS-55713
LIEBHERR LTM- 1090
LIEBHERR LTM- 1250
LIEBHERR LG-1550
Kamatsu PC-300
RDK-25
DEK-401
AGP-2204, AGP-18
T-30
KAMAZ-5320
SB-72-1 mounted on
KAMAZ-55111 wheelbase
Filling and hydrostatic testing unit ASN-1000
Electric vibrators
IV-119, IV-91
Vibratory Pile Driver
Muller MS-25H
Compressor
PR-10
Gas cutting and welding machine
Gas welding machine
Welding group
ADD-4001
Welding machine
ADD-3112
Rectifier welding machine
VD 1002 (6 stations)
Automatic welding machine
Pile driving rig
Junttan -250
Gamma flaw detector
Ultrasonic flaw detector
Bitumen boiler
Painting unit
S-4,S-74
Transformer welder
TDM-500
Compactor
Parameter
Q-ty, pcs.
Source
N=125kW
70 kW
79 kW
45 passengers
10t
10t
19t
40 t
19t
44 kW
44 kW
169 kW
176 kW
350 kW
180 kW
240 kW
180 kW, crawler
74 kW
90 kW
116 kW
95 kW
21 t
8t
5
1
1
1
2
3
10
2
3
2
5
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
6201
6201
6201
6202
6202
6202
6202
6202
6202
6201
6201
6203
6203
6203
6203
6203
6203
6203
6203
6204
6204
6202
6202
213 kW
2
6
2
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
4
0201
6201
0202 -0204
6206, 6207
6206, 6207
-
150 kW
73 kW
37 kW
25 kW
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
6208
-
49
. .
.
. .
Operation of diesel plants will result in air emissions of the following substances: nitrogen
dioxide, nitrogen oxide, carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide, kerosene, black carbon (soot),
formaldehyde, benzo(a)pyrene (sources 0201-0204, 6206-6207).
Operation of construction machinery will result in air emissions of the following substances:
carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen oxide, kerosene, black carbon (soot), sulphur dioxide
(sources 6201, 6203-6204).
Truck transport traffic on internal passages will result in air emissions of the following
substances: nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen oxide, carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide, (petroleum, lowsulphur) benzine (source 6202).
Painting will result in air emissions of the following substances: propane-2-one (acetone), butyl
acetate, butan-1-ol (n-butyl alcohol), ethanol (ethyl alcohol), methyl benzene (toluene), 2ethoxyethanol (ethyl cellosolve, ethylene glycol ethyl ether), dimethylbenzene (xylene) (mixture of
o-, m-, p-isomers), white-spirit, suspended particles (source 6211).
Welding will result in air emissions of the following substances: iron oxide, manganese and its
compounds, chromium (VI) oxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, gaseous fluorides, poorly
soluble fluorides, inorganic dust: 70-20% Si02 (source 6210).
Refueling of construction machinery using a diesel fuel and gasoline tank truck will result in air
emissions of the following pollutants: hydrogen sulfide, saturated hydrocarbons 1-5, saturated
hydrocarbons 6-10, saturated hydrocarbons 12-19, amylene, benzene, xylene, toluene, ethyl
benzene (source 6205).
Inert material loading and unloading will result in air emissions of the following pollutants:
inorganic dust 70-20% SiO2 (source 6209).
Bitumen preparation process, particularly bitumen heating, will result in air emissions of the
following pollutants: nitrogen dioxide, black carbon (soot), sulphur dioxide, carbon monoxide, oil
ash (source 6208).
During construction of hydraulic engineering structures and onshore facilities, floating cranes,
diving boats, ice tow-boats and tow-boats of various power are used. Operation of engineering
floating crafts will result in air emissions of the following substances: carbon monoxide, nitrogen
dioxide, nitrogen oxide, kerosene, black carbon (soot), sulphur dioxide, formaldehyde,
benzo(a)pyrene (source 6209).
16 sources in total during construction have been identified, 4 of which are point sources and
12 of which are fugitive emissions sources.
Emissions during construction include 26 polluting ingredients, 6 of which are solids and 20 of
which are liquid or gaseous substances.
Some emitted substances form groups having an impact summation effect, such as:
6006 Nitrogen dioxide, and oxide, oil ash, sulphur dioxide
6035 Hydrogen sulfide, formaldehyde
6043 Sulphur dioxide and hydrogen sulphide
6046 Carbon monoxide and cement dust
6204 Sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide
6205 Sulphur dioxide and fluorine hydride
The total amount of construction emissions is 93.225090 t, of which: 6.927927 t of solids and
86.297163 t of liquid and gaseous substances.
Gross emissions of pollutants during the construction period, according to construction stages,
are given in Table 3.1.2.
Table 3.1.2 - Gross emissions of pollutants during the construction period
Substance
code
0123
0143
0203
0301
Criterion used
name
Iron oxide
Manganese and its compounds
Chromium (hexavalent chrome)
Nitrogen dioxide (nitrogen (IV) oxide)
Criterion
value,
mg/m3
0.040000
0.010000
0.001500
0.200000
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
50
0304
0328
0330
0333
0337
0342
0616
0621
0703
1042
1061
1119
1210
1325
1401
2704
2732
2752
2754
2902
2904
2908
0.400000
0.150000
0.500000
0.008000
5.000000
0.020000
0.200000
0.600000
0.000001
0.100000
5.000000
0.700000
3
3
3
2
4
2
3
3
1
3
4
0.1858653
0.2083837
0.6748219
0.0000244
1.3446142
0.0000298
0.0499861
0.0212963
0.0000005
0.0097260
0.0129680
0.0048556
5.609648
5.945189
4.605414
0.002414
31.550428
0.000313
0.081441
0.030624
0.000000
0.006076
0.006060
0.009706
0.100000
0.035000
0.350000
5.000000
1.200000
1.000000
1.000000
0.500000
0.002000
4
2
4
4
0.0042593
0.0040161
0.0097260
0.0011500
0.3142176
0.0114310
0.0086943
0.0073622
0.0000815
0.005750
0.003571
0.019578
0.002279
8.812955
0.028240
0.859486
0.015755
0.000133
0.300000
0.0350000
4.0552865
0.2510621
3.8042244
0.965790
93.225090
6.927927
86.297163
4
3
2
Emission calculations are made based on the effective methods and using recommended
programs (List of Atmospheric Pollutant Emission Calculation Methods Used in 2014 For Rationing
and Determining Amounts of Atmospheric Emissions of Harmful (Polluting) Substances put into
effect by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federation (Minprirody
of Russia) (Letter No.12-46/709 dd. January 25, 2010):
Calculations of emissions from construction machinery have been made using the Integral's
ATP-Ecolog software (version 3.0) where the following methods are implemented:
Method for Atmospheric Emission Inventory for Motor Transport Enterprises (calculation
method), Moscow, 1998 (Sections 2, 3.1, 3.3, 3.12-3.15).
Method for Atmospheric Emission Inventory for Motor Vehicle Repair Enterprises
(calculation method) Moscow, 1998 (Sections 3.5, 3.12).
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
51
Method for Calculation of Atmospheric Emissions from Stationary Diesel Plants, SaintPetersburg, 2001.
. .
. .
Guidance Manual for Atmospheric Emission Calculating, Rationing, and Monitoring, SaintPetersburg, 2005 (para. 1.6.9).
Calculations of emissions resulting from refueling of construction machinery have been
made using the Integral's AZS-Ecolog software, where the following methods are implemented:
Guidance Manual For Defining Atmospheric Emissions from Tanks, Kazan, Novopolotsk,
Moscow, 1997 (except for paras. 5.1.3, 5.1.4, 5.4, 5.5).
Supplement to the Guidance Manual.... Saint-Petersburg, Research and Development
Institute "Atmosfera", 1999.
Guidance Letter from Research and Development Institute "Atmosfera" No. 610/33-07 dd.
September 29, 2000.
Guidance Manual for Atmospheric Emission Calculating, Rationing, and Monitoring, SaintPetersburg, 2005 (para. 2.6.2).
Methods for Defining Atmospheric Emissions At Enterprises of Goskomnefteprodukt of
Russia, Astrakhan, 1988 (calculation for natural gas filling stations).
Calculations of emissions resulting from inert material handling have been made using the
Integral's RNV-Ecolog software (version 3.2.1.38), where the following methods are implemented:
Guidance Manual for Calculation of Fugitive Emissions Resulting from Construction
Material Production, Novorossiysk, 2002.
Guidance Manual for Atmospheric Emission Calculating, Rationing, and Monitoring, SaintPetersburg, 2005.
Calculations of emissions resulting from painting and varnishing have been made using the
Integral's Lakokraska (Painting and Vanishing) software (version 2.0) where the following methods
are implemented:
Method for Calculations of Atmospheric Pollutant Release (Emissions) Resulting from
Application of Paint Materials (Based On Specific Emission Values), Saint-Petersburg, 1997.
Guidance Manual for Atmospheric Emission Calculating, Rationing, and Monitoring, SaintPetersburg, 2005, (para. 1.6.5).
Calculations of emissions resulting from bitumen preparation have been made using the
Integral's AZS-Ecolog software, where the following methods are implemented:
Procedure for Atmospheric Emission Inventory for Coating Plants (calculation method),
Moscow, 1998.
The data of design inventory may be used to:
calculate pollutant dissipation in the atmosphere
substantiate the allowability of pollutant source impacts on the environment.
3.1.1.1 Results of calculations of pollutant ground level concentrations during the construction
Preliminary calculations of pollutant dissipation in the atmosphere have been made to assess
the impact of pollutant emissions to the atmosphere.
The calculation of maximum pollutant ground level concentrations has been carried out based
on the OND-86 procedure using Unified Software For Calculation of Atmospheric Pollution Degree
"Ecolog", version 3.0, by Integral for the summer season by successive selection of all wind
directions and speeds required for the region and with account of pollutant background
concentrations.
Calculations of pollutant dissipation in the atmosphere have been made in the local coordinate
system, within a calculation area of 5000x5000 m and with a grid pitch of 200 m.
Calculations have been made for 27 ingredients (6 solids and 21 liquid and gaseous substances)
and 6 summation groups.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
52
Control points have been defined at the boundary of the nearest settlements to assess and
monitor emission impacts. The list of control points and their coordinates on the schematic map are
given in Table 3.1.3.
Table 3.1.3 - List of control points and their coordinates on the schematic map
Item
Height
(m)
82319.00
22057.00
82316.00
22666.00
82437.00
23888.00
82276.00
24709.00
82403.00
25146.00
Point type
Note
Calculated values for pollutant ground level concentrations at all control points are given in
Table 3.1.4.
Table 3.1.4 - Pollutant ground level concentrations resulted from emissions during construction
(Stage 1) with account of background concentrations
Pollutant
Code
Name
No.
ref. point
0123
0143
0203
0301
0304
0328
0330
0333
0337
0342
0616
0621
0703
Iron oxide
Manganese and its compounds
Chromium (hexavalent chrome)
Nitrogen dioxide
Nitrogen oxide
Carbon (soot)
Sulphur dioxide
dihydrosulfide (hydrogen sulphide)
Carbon monoxide
Gaseous fluorides
Dimethylbenzene (Xylene)
Methyl benzene (Toluene)
Benzo(a)pyrene (3,4-benzopyrene)
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
Calculated max.
Background
concentration
concentration (parts of MPC) within the
(parts of MPC) residential area, with account
of the background
0.0001
0.0002
0.0001
0.28
0.5500
0.0200
0.0600
0.02
0.0900
0.0001
0.36
0.3720
0.0002
0.0100
0.0019
0.0032
. .
. .
Pollutant
No.
ref. point
Code
Item
1042
1061
1119
1210
1325
1401
2704
2732
2752
2754
Background
concentration
(parts of MPC)
_
Calculated max.
concentration (parts of
MPC) within the
residential area, with
account of the background
0.0051
0.0001
0.0004
0.0022
0.0082
0.0015
0.0002
0.0100
0.0006
0.0004
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
53
2902
2904
0.28
-
0.2810
0.0002
2908
6006
Suspended substances
2
Oil ash produced by heat power plants (in terms of 2
vanadium)
Inorganic dust: 70-20% Si02
2
Nitrogen dioxide and oxide, oil ash, sulphur dioxide
3
0.0031
0.3400
6035
6043
6046
6204
6205
0.0083
0.0600
0.0100
0.2000
0.0400
3
2
2
3
2
The analysis of calculation results has shown that for all pollutants released during construction
maximum ground level concentrations at the boundary of the nearest residential area do not go
beyond the MPC with account of background concentrations.
The analysis of calculation results proves that pollutant emissions to the atmosphere during
construction make an allowable contribution to the atmospheric pollution level.
3.1.1.2 Environmental measures
The following measures shall be taken to reduce atmospheric emissions during the construction
of the Terminal:
regulated conditions of construction and installation operations
monitoring of adherence to the operating procedures
use of machines in a good operating condition and mechanisms with adjusted fuel systems
which allow for pollutant release together with exhaust gases within the predefined limit
soil shall be moistened in the summer season to control dust during earthwork
in case of transporting bulk construction materials, soil, or construction waste, special
canvas covers shall be put on the truck body to prevent rising of dust from bulk materials being
transported.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
54
. .
. .
ventilating ducts
relief valves of processing vessels for methanol or diesel fuel, flare stacks as a part of low- /
high-pressure flaring systems
an acid gas incinerator fume stack, a hot oil heater fume stack etc.
Fugitive emissions are clearance leaks from seals and processing equipment connections,
connections of shut-off and control valves located on the outdoor areas of the Terminal, tank truck
traffic within the Facility.
Allowing for any leaks in flanges, equipment, and shut-off and control valves, the sources of
fugitive emissions of saturated hydrocarbons, benzene, xylene, toluene, ethyl mercaptan and
hydrogen sulphide are the following processing modules: acid gas removal, drying, mercury removal,
fractionation of broad fraction of light hydrocarbons, fractionation, cooling, liquefaction,
denitrification, fuel gas enrichment, flaring system separators, gas separating tanks of the drainage
system, makeup refrigerant storage site, chemicals storage site, diesel fuel storage site etc.
Trucks transporting consumables to the modules and tank trucks for LNG loading and
unloading go through the Terminal site.
Motor vehicle engines emit nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide, kerosene and
soot to the atmosphere.
The power source for the processing electric equipment being designed shall be an electric
power plant, mini TPP, being designed which is based on three 2x1000 kVA gas powered electrical
generators (GPEG) as well as a 2x1000 kVA unitized transformer substation KTP-1-1000/10/0,4
being designed which comprises with two power dry-type transformers. If a GPEG runs on gas, the
following substances are released to the atmosphere: nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen (II) oxide, carbon
monoxide, methane, benzo(a)pyrene.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
55
Nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide, soot, kerosene, formaldehyde and
benzo(a)pyrene are emitted to the atmosphere during operation of the emergency diesel generator of
essential systems.
Saturated hydrocarbons are released to the atmosphere during filling containers with diesel
fuel.
Nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide, soot, saturated hydrocarbons, benzene,
xylene, and toluene are emitted to the atmosphere during acid gas incineration.
Methyl diethanolamine (MDEA) will be discharged into the atmosphere during filling a
container with fresh amine.
For LNG marine freight, 3 liquefied gas tankers are supposed to be used. Mooring of vessels is
carried out by tow boats of type PE 65 being the property of Port of Vysotsk. Towing and mooring of
vessels will result in air emissions of the following pollutants: nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen (II) oxide,
carbon (soot), sulphur dioxide (sulfurous anhydride), carbon monoxide, formaldehyde,
benzo(a)pyrene, kerosene.
The list of pollutants released during the Terminal operation is given in Table 3.1.5.
Table 3.1.5 - List of pollutants discharged into the atmosphere during operation
Substance
code
name
. .
. .
0301
0304
0328
0330
0333
0337
0402
0408
0409
0410
0415
0416
0602
0616
0621
0703
1052
1325
1728
2732
2754
Criterion used
Criterion
value,
mg/m3
One-time MPC
One-time MPC
One-time MPC
One-time MPC
One-time MPC
One-time MPC
One-time MPC
One-time MPC
TSEL
TSEL
TSEL
TSEL
One-time MPC
One-time MPC
One-time MPC
MPC, av. daily
One-time MPC
One-time MPC
One-time MPC
TSEL
One-time MPC
0.200000
0.400000
0.150000
0.500000
0.008000
5.000000
200.0000
1.400000
0.100000
50.00000
50.00000
60.00000
0.300000
0.200000
0.600000
0.000001
1.000000
0.035000
0.000050
1.200000
1.000000
TSEL
0.050000
Hazard
class
3
3
3
3
2
4
4
4
2
3
3
1
3
2
3
4
Total emissions
g/sec
4.397789
0.713944
0.117953
0.066942
1.82-06
5.531463
9.09-09
5.45-07
4.55-07
1.913755
0.694759
0.096463
0.011185
0.01184
0.010949
9.09-08
0.006455
0.001127
2.73-07
0.028468
0.04554
t/year
55.78815
9.062008
0.572344
0.78562
5.19-05
112.3869
0
0.001389
0.002832
58.41878
12.23292
3.19518
0.364785
0.393663
0.357051
1.82-07
0.181818
0.002026
0.000781
0.056299
0.363175
1.82-06
0.000059
13.64864
0.117954
13.53068
254.1658
0.572344
253.5935
Assessment of the amount of atmospheric emissions from motor vehicles has been made using
the ATP-Ecolog software developed in accordance with the Method for Atmospheric Emission
Inventory for Motor Transport Enterprises and the supplement thereto.
Assessment of the amount of atmospheric emissions from gas powered electrical generators
(GPEG) has been made using the Kotelnye (Boiler House) software (version 3.3) where the Method
for Determining Atmospheric Emissions during Fuel Combustion of Boilers With an Efficiency of
Less than 30 Tons of Steam per Hour or Less than 20 Gcal per Hour is implemented.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
56
Assessment of the amount of pollutants released into the atmosphere from the emergency diesel
generator and vessels has been made using the Diesel software (version 2.0) where the Method for
Calculating Atmospheric Emissions from Stationary Diesel Plants is implemented.
Assessment of the amount of pollutants released into the atmosphere from the diesel fuel
storage tank has been carried out using Intergral's AZS-Ecolog software, version 1.6.4.49, based on
the Guidance Manual for Defining Atmospheric Emissions from Tanks and the Supplement thereto.
3.1.2.2 Results of calculations of pollutant ground level concentrations during operation
. .
calculation of ground level concentrations of air pollutants the industrial emissions contain
shall be made in accordance with the requirements of the Methods For Calculating Concentrations of
Air Pollutants the Industrial Emission Contains, All-Union Regulatory Document OND-86
calculation of pollutant concentrations in the ground layer of the atmosphere shall be
carried out on a PC and using the Unified Software For Calculation of Atmospheric Pollution Degree
"ECOLOG" (version 3.0). This software is permitted to be used and approved by the Voeikov Main
Geophysical Observatory
the climatic characteristic of the Facility location area is in accordance with Table 2.14
the list of pollutants emitted into the atmosphere is as specified in Table 3.1.5
parameters of pollutant emissions are given in Table 3.2.5
pollutant settlement factors are in accordance with para. 2.5 of All-Union Regulatory
Document OND-86
the calculation square is accepted to be 5000x5000 m, the pitch of the calculation square
is100x100 m
terrain relief factors equals to 1
dispersion was carried out in the summer season.
Calculation of dispersion is made for 22 ingredients (20 gaseous substances and 2 solids).
The calculation has been made in 6 points to determine maximum ground level concentrations
of air pollutants. The list of calculation points and their characteristics are given in Table 3.1.6.
Table 3.1.6 - List of calculation points and their characteristics
No.
Height
(m)
1423.70
920.70
866.60
-669.30
-974.90
-298.60
-297.50
1429.70
3223.10
2411.00
3363.60
913.70
Point type
Note
The analysis of the calculation results has shown that maximum ground level concentrations at
the boundaries of the Sanitary Protection Zone of the Terminal being designed and on the faces of the
nearest residential buildings do not exceed MPCs with account of background concentrations, for all
the ingredients considered.
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
57
scheduled and emergency release of combustion gases to the atmosphere shall be carried
out through the flaring system only
emergency flare relief systems shall be equipped with quick-acting shut-off valves
cold fluid afterburner and warm fluid afterburner shall not be used simultaneously
use of equipment in a good operating condition which has been inspected for the toxicity
level of exhaust gases to reduce emissions of air pollutants
constant preventive inspection and diesel machinery fuel system adjustment to reduce
diesel fuel consumption
air monitoring is provided by gas detectors
work to be carried out shall involve the minimum quantity of machinery used at the site
in order to prevent from gross pollution of the lower atmosphere under unfavorable meteorological
conditions (no-wind conditions, stable air temperature inversions).
3.1.2.4 Conclusions
The analysis of the results of air pollutant dissipation calculations has proven as follows:
maximum concentrations at the boundary of the Sanitary Protection Zone and residential
buildings for all pollutants being analyzed do not exceed the MPC with account of background
concentrations.
Based on the results of calculations of air pollutant emissions in the ground layer of the
atmosphere, it can be stated that the Facility does not impact on the air pollution level at the boundary
of the Sanitary Protection Zone as well as at the boundary of the residential area.
The Project suggests determining a Sanitary Protection Zone for calculations by air impact to
be equal 1000 metres in all directions from the area boundary.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
58
. .
.
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
59
protection measures are taken, the impact of the geological environment during normal operation will
be acceptable.
3.2.1 Measures For Protection of Subsurface Resources and the Geological Environment
Measures for protection of subsurface resources and the geological environment during the
construction include the set of engineering and organizational measures to be taken during
construction and planning of sites and line structures. Such measures include:
planning of flattening of all cut and backfilled slopes
laying of pipeline routes in such a way that construction operations at the areas with
potential pipeline instability are avoided whenever it is possible
surface water drainage systems to drain water from working sites and motor road beds
no techniques and methods which promote soil washing-out, wind erosion and sloughing,
ravine development, sand washing-out and genesis of bog soils will be used during earthwork.
. .
. .
To prevent pollution of subsurface resources during operation, the project provides for:
complete sealing of the processes
use of equipment resistant to corrosion and abrasion
closure embankment of process sites and structures where accidental release of liquid
products is possible, including construction of a storm water collection system for such sites
cathodic polarization of underground steel facilities to protect them against soil corrosion
high level of production process automation which provides for alarms about any deviations
of process parameters from the allowable values in potential emergency situations.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
60
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
61
. .
. .
pipeline laying
a package of work on land improvement.
As a result of implementation of a construction work package, the direct impact can be
represented by:
technogenic deformation of the microrelief due to repeated passing of heavy construction
machinery (ruts, grooves etc.)
structural soil disturbance at the boundaries of plots of land when constructing passages and
draining trenches and excavation work for buildings
changes in the water balance of the zone of aeration
soil disturbance in the areas adjacent to the facilities being constructed, due to the impact of
machinery
soil pollution by construction materials and wastes in the area adjoining to the facilities
being constructed
soil pollution by petroleum products in case of machinery malfunctions leading to petroleum
product spillages.
Soil pollution by petroleum products in case of machinery malfunctions leads to the following
adverse effects:
deterioration in the morphological and physicochemical soil properties
deterioration in the hydrophysical properties, decrease of aeration
deterioration in the soil humus condition
changes in biocenosis, demise of invertebrate animals, inactivation of nitrifying bacteria,
reduction in fermentation activity
deterioration of the reductive-oxidative conditions, increase of toxic Fe II oxides.
The lower limit of petroleum and petroleum product concentration in the polluted soil is 0.1 to
1.0 g/kg. In this case the soil can become a source of secondary pollution of surface and underground
waters. Groundwaters are considered as polluted if petroleum and petroleum product concentration in
them equals to 0.05 mg/l in water filtered through soil.
Indirect impact during construction of the facilities being designed can be represented by
indirect soil pollution by heavy metals and organic chemical compounds from running internal
combustion engines.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
62
Operation of the facilities being designed will result in an indirect impact only. The most
considerable indirect impact of soil resources is an indirect impact on soils adjacent to the facilities
being constructed in areas of industrial emissions which components can contribute to desalination of
major cations (calcium and manganese) and their removal out of soil stratum. If soil acidity increases
and soil buffering decreases, many metals transfer into mobile forms.
3.3.3 Measures for Protection and Substantial Use of Land Resources and Soil Mantle
. .
. .
The following environmental protection measures shall be taken during preparatory work at the
sites intended for the facility construction:
location of sites for facility constructions are selected with account of topographical,
landscape and soil aspects of the natural environment
machinery movement is prohibited beyond the alloted land
parking lots and refueling stations for specialized machinery and motor vehicles are
equipped with trays which prevent POL spillages on soils
waste and debris collection and storage areas are covered with a solid coating (asphalt,
concrete) and provided with containers
timely construction and operational waste and debris disposal
use of machines in a good operating condition and mechanisms with adjusted fuel systems
which has been subjected to technical inspection prior to commencement of work.
The Project is planned to include compulsory restoration (recultivation) of temporarily alloted
lands which were disturbed.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
63
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
64
Three water supply systems are provided at the sites: a process pipeline, a cold water supply
pipeline and a fire water pipeline.
A drinking water treatment station is used for water treatment. Water will be supplied to a
drinking water tank and then pumped to the cold water supply line.
Water Disposal System
A separate sewage system is to be constructed at all sites of the Terminal: a sanitary sewage
system, a process sewage system and a storm sewage system.
Sanitary, process and storm (melt) wastewater are supplied to sewage treatment plants.
Mechanical and biological treatment methods are used for wastewater purification. Pollution load in
treated wastewater shall correspond to MPC to be discharged to a water body in accordance with
Sanitary Regulations and Standards SanPiN 2.1.5.980-00.
Sanitary wastewater from sanitation facilities and process wastewater from heating unit drains
are supplied to sanitary wastewater treatment plants. Pollution load in sanitary wastewater equals to:
suspended matters - 300 mg/l; Biological Oxygen Demand 20 ~ 100 mg/l; ammonia nitrogen -35
mg/l; phosphates -15 mg/l.
Storm and melt wastewater from rainwater wells are supplied to storm wastewater treatment
plants. Pollution load in storm wastewater equals to 500-2,000 mg/l for suspended matters and 10-30
mg/l for petroleum products.
Sanitary wastewater treatment and storm wastewater treatment will be performed in separate
flows.
Treatment plants shall include a primary wastewater treatment unit based on a combination of
conventional and patented technologies.
Hourly average capacity of treatment plants shall be at least:
for process and storm wastewater -15.5 m 3/hour
for sanitary wastewater - 0.5 m3/hour.
The excepted pollution degree of process and storm wastewater is as follows:
petroleum products 20-150 mg/l
emulsifiable petroleum products - 2 to 5 mg/l
suspended matters 100 mg/l.
Quality of treated wastewater is described on Table 3.4.1.
Table 3.4.1 - Quality of treated wastewater
Treated wastewater
Measurement units
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
. .
. .
Parameter
pH
Suspended substances
BOD compl.
COD
Ammonia nitrogen
Nitrite nitrogen
Nitrate nitrogen
Phosphates
Synthetic Surfactants
Petroleum products
Dissolved oxygen
Value
6.5...8.5
3.0
3.0
30.0
0.4
0.02
7.0...8.0
0.5
0.1
0.05
4.0
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
65
PACKAGE
TREATMENT
PLANT KOU-50
BIO; biological
treatment
Operational
personnel vital
activities
70
PACKAGE
TREATMENT
LNG Complex area
PLANT KOU-10D; and the waterfront
mechanical
area
treatment
114
Prior to
After
treatment treatment
Suspended
substances
BOD20
Ammonia
nitrogen
Phosphates
Suspended
substances
Petroleum
products
%
Treated wastewater
of
outlet
treatment
300
99
100
97
35
0.4
98
15
0.2
98
1250
99.7
20
0.05
99.7
Disinfection units;
discharge to the
offshore zone.
After being treated by Package Treatment Plant KOU-50 BIO and Package Treatment Plant
KOU-10D (or equivalent equipment), treated and clarified wastewater is subject to ultraviolet
disinfection on the disinfection unit. Ultraviolet rays within the band of 253.7 mm penetrate in water
and affect remaining pathogenic microorganisms and viruses which directly leads to their
inactivation.
Treated wastewater discharge is made by dispersing in the offshore area.
The characteristic of pollutants in the treated wastewater discharged to Bolshaya Pikhtovaya
Bay (with account of requirements to water basins of commercial fishing importance) is given in
Table 3.4.3.
The strict observance of the rules for use of natural resources consists in prevention and
complete exclusion of accidental discharge of untreated wastewater to water bodies. For this purpose
it is necessary to ensure normal operation of plants and equipment for wastewater collection and
transportation.
All types of wastewater produced at the Facility will be directed to treatment plants to prevent
accidental discharges.
Table 3.4.3 - Characteristic of pollutants in treated wastewater discharge to Bolshaya
Pikhtovaya Bay
. .
. .
Pollutant in wastewater
Hazard class
C calc.
7.5
Dry solid
4
50
COD
4
20
Total nitrogen content
1.5
Total phosphorus content 1
2. Substances of toxicological LHI
Total ferrum content
4
0.02
Ammonia nitrogen
4
0.12
Nitrite nitrogen
0.01
3. Substances of sanitary-toxicological LHI
MAC, fishery
3
10
6.5 -8.5
1000
30
12
1.5
0.1
0.39
0.02
0.2 of MPC
0.3 of MPC
0.5 of MPC
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
Note
66
Sulphates
4
Chlorides
4
Nitrate nitrogen
Anionic surfactants
4
4. Substances of fishery LHI
Petroleum products
3
Substances belonging to the sanitary group
Phosphates
4*
* - moderately
20
25
0.2
0.01
100
300
9.1
0.1
0.2 of MPC
0.1 of MPC
0.02 of MPC
0.1 of MPC
0.05
0.05
MPC
0.2
0.2
MPC
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
67
. .
.
. .
Places where fuel spills are possible (refueling station for motor vehicle and machinery parking
lot) are provided with a coating resistant to petroleum product exposure.
Construction transport wheel cleaning (washing) stations equipped with a Moydodyr recycling
water system are installed at all exits from the construction sites to prevent pollutants from exporting.
Wheels shall be washed in specially designated areas where the possibility of oil or other substance
entry into the soil and water bodies is excluded.
Work on area planning will have an admissible impact on surface waters providing that the
design solutions and environmental protection measures are strictly observed. This type of impact is
of local and temporary nature.
For the purpose of prevention of environment pollution sanitary waste water produced at
construction sites and temporary establishments are collected to closed sealed tanks and transported
to treatment plant of the camp located within the area of the Teriberka village. Suitable wastewater
treatment plants (treatment includes mechanical treatment, biological treatment, post-treatment by
filtering and UV radiation disinfection) are provided to purify the whole volume of sanitary
wastewater produced during construction. The treated water is supplied to the common manifold and
then discharged into the sea.
The quality of wastewater purified in treatment plants meet the requirements to water quality of
fishery water bodies. This impact is local and temporary and will not change the existing
hydrochemical regime of a water body.
Thus, the main impact on surface water bodies at the Terminal facility construction stage is an
increased removal of suspended substances from the area of planning operations. A set of surface
wastewater drainage and treatment measures is developed to minimize a potential impact.
The impact on the environment will be local and temporary providing that design solutions for
construction and installation work are strictly observed and environmental protection measures are
taken.
Impact on surface waters during operation is less intensive than that one during construction.
The water supply system being designed takes into account peculiarities of facilities, water
consumption rate required at various development stages, water supply sources, requirements to
water head, quality and situation. Technical solutions on water supply and disposal are intended to
meet the needs of the production plant being designed, with account of the process.
No direct impact on water bodies will occur.
Technogenic impact on surface waters during operation of the Facility being designed may be
resulted from improper wastewater handling, including possible wastewater spills in case of an
emergency situation and washing the polluted water out of the production site. Such an impact can
result in changes in the hydrochemical regime and the qualitative composition of waters in water
bodies located at the adjacent area.
For the purpose of environmental pollution prevention, the Project provides for the following
utilities to be used to collect and dispose all categories of wastewater produced at the Terminal
facilities: a sanitary sewage network and a process and storm sewage network.
Reliable collection and disposal of surface wastewater, prevention of fugitive and uncontrolled
wastewater discharges and protection of adjacent areas and underground and surface waters against
pollutions in case of leaks and spills etc. are ensured by suitable sewage systems where wastewater is
classified by the degree of pollution and directed to corresponding treatment plants.
Wastewater treatment process flows provided by the Project ensure a high degree of
wastewater purification up to MPC fishery. Discharge of wastewater is not provided.
Thus, the impact on surface waters is admissible in case of a normal (no-failure) operation of
the facilities and observance of environmental protection measures.
Construction period Underground waters of the area being examined belong to two reservoir
types, a porous reservoir and a naturally fractured reservoir, having contrasting conditions of feeding,
filtration, unloading, and dissolved compound mass transfer. This predefines the differences in the
hydrodynamic and hydrochemical regimes of zonal distribution.
The main impact on underground waters will be resulted from the following types of work:
removal of a loose surface layer at the construction site
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
68
. .
.
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
69
traffic flow and transport station (except for special means of transportation), except for
traffic flow along by roads and parking on the roads and at specifically equipped places provided
with hard surface.
It is permitted to design, position, construct, reconstruct, put into operation and operate
economical and other facilities within the boundaries of water protective areas provided such
facilities are equipped with the structures ensuring protection of water bodies against contamination,
clogging and depletion of waters in accordance with water legislation and legislation in the sphere
of environment protection.
According to the Water code (rev.2012) the water protective area for the Bay of Vyborg
(Finland) equals 500 m.
It is necessary to take into account all the requirements of the Water code of RF when
designing facilities in the water protective area.
. .
3.4.5 Measures for protection of surface and subterranean waters for operation period
The measures providing for reasonable utilization and protection of water bodies against
contamination during operation period include:
elimination of discharging of unfiltered and/or insufficiently filtered runoffs;
development and implementation of the complex of environmental protection measures
precluding contamination of water bodies with hydrocarbon-bearing contaminants and chemical
reagents used during operation of facilities;
development and installation of systems for collecting all types of contaminated runoffs and
liquid wastes from the closed drainage systems, open drainage systems, drainage vessels, containers
with subsequent disposal thereof;
installation of special underpans in places of possible leakages and spillages of fuels and
lubricants;
prevention of contamination with dangerous substances used in the production processes;
application of sewage water treatment technology making it possible to ensure a stable
high-quality sewage treatment to water-quality standards of water bodies of commercial fishing
importance;
strict adherence to technical specifications of monitoring the wastewater formation and
quality thereof, including: availability of a system of water discharge control and a system of water
temperature and water quality control at water discharge; presence of a laboratory equipped with a
system of water control, etc.;
availability of water discharge control system and water temperature and water quality
control system at water discharge;
plans of checking compliance with environmental requirements have been developed for all
production plants and systems;
system of production environmental control and monitoring.
. .
3.4.6 Measures for protection of surface and subterranean waters for construction period
In order to reduce a negative impact on the territory aquatic resources (surface and
subterranean waters), preventing contamination and depletion thereof during construction, a design
provides for the following:
mandatory adherence to the boundaries of the territory allotted for construction;
compliance with all environmental requirements to carrying out the earthwork at highwater beds and onshore crossing areas laid down in the construction standards for earthwork
structures;
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
70
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
71
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
72
. .
. .
3.5.3 Measures for reducing level of impact on soil mantle and vegetational cover
The design provides for the following measures to reduce the impact on the soil mantle and
vegetational cover:
carrying out all construction activities and transport movement strongly within the limits of
right-of-way lands, prohibition of transport movement beyond its boundaries;
ensuring measures for maximum preservation of soil and vegetation cover (selecting
territories for the sites and structures taking into account the soil and vegetation cover, conducting
recultivation activities for restoration of soils disturbed during construction or operation).
In order to reduce impact on the vegetational cover related to a possibility of chemical
contamination of soil mantle and vegetation damage, the following has been envisaged:
preventing cases of spillage and leakage, discharge of unfiltered waste water to the soil
mantle;
separate collection and stacking wastes into special containers or vessels with subsequent
lift-out to the equipped landfills or for recycling;
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
73
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
74
A period of construction will be universally accompanied for the land birds and mammals, as
a general rule, by the reduction of quantity and abundance of species. The basic reasons for these
are the discomfort factor and increased fishing pressure (including illegal fishing).
The watersheds used for construction feature low numbers of animals; the valleys of rivers,
creeks and banks of lakes are of greater importance.
It should be noted that the calculation of damage from manifestation of discomfort factor will
be effected during construction period only.
A complex of developed environmental protection measures will contribute to minimization of
direct and indirect impact on animal life and preservation of biological diversity of territory under
consideration.
. .
. .
3.5.6 Measures for protecting objects of animal life and habitat thereof, including measures
for protecting aquatic biological resources
The following normative legal documents (or documents replacing them in future) have been
taken into consideration in the course of developing measures for protecting animal life and fish
resources:
Forestry Code No. 200- dated 04.12.2006;
Concerning Fauna (Federal law No.52- dated 24.04.95 as amended as of 29.12.2006);
Requirements on preventing death of animal life objects when effecting production
processes as well as during operation of main transport routes, pipelines, lines of communication
and electric power supply (appr. by resolution of the Government of RF No.997 dated 13.08.96);
Other effective technical standard documents.
It is necessary to provide for the measures ensuring reduction of impact on the animal life in
the course of designing and performing construction works. They include the following:
minimal land transfer for preserving fur and feather habitability conditions;
in order to prevent contamination of water entities and water courses, the residual
materials, structures and construction debris will be cleaned up upon construction completion into
containers specifically allotted for this purpose, or stacked at the sites prepared in advance to be
moved away later on to the existing landfills for neutralization and disposal thereof;
storage of petroleum products in tight vessels;
transfer of construction machinery and means of transportation using specifically
designated roads only;
excluding stationing of builders shelter, assembly and fuelling sites within the limits of
water protection areas;
equipment of water intakes with fish-diversion nets;
limiting quantity of charges detonated simultaneously as approaching a water object, down
to one detonation at the edge of water;
periodic fulfillment of deratization measures for limiting quantities of mouse-like rodents at
the places of builders temporary stationing, since the rodents can become a source of dangerous
zoogenous infections;
excluding cases of poaching through introduction of prohibition by the construction
administration to bring to the construction site territory any tools for cropping animals (weapons,
steel traps, etc.);
excluding probability of fire at the adjacent terrain, strict compliance with fire safety rules;
strong prohibition of dogs loose keeping as well as free keeping of the other domestic
animals;
arrangement of enclosures at the sites.
A complex of environmental protection measures aimed at minimization of direct and indirect
negative impact of the planned works on animal life will contribute to preservation of biological
diversity of the construction site territory.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
75
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
76
. .
.
. .
roofing and cladding materials, saw materials, gypsum board, brick scrap etc. Classification
construction materials is given below.
- Technical maintenance of construction equipment and vehicles followed by generation of
wastes which may be classified as spent motor oils, transmission and hydraulic liquids, oilcontaminated wiping rags, spent oil filters, spent fuel filters, spent air filters, spent lead batteries,
spent tires and wastes containing ferrous and non-ferrous metals.
It is foreseen that construction site territories will be illuminated by pole-mounted sodium
lamps. Amenity and office premises will be illuminated by luminescent lamps. Replacement of spent
mercury-containing lamps used for construction areas and amenity premises illumination will cause
generation of wastes which will be classified as mercury-containing lamps, spent mercury-containing
luminescent tubes and rejects.
Generation of considerable volume of wastes is anticipated as a result of construction camp
residents activities. Basic wastes generating activities are:
- External and internal illumination provided by luminescent lamps subject to replacement after
coming out of service and causing generation of wastes which may be classified as mercurycontaining lamps, spent mercury-containing luminescent tubes and rejects.
- Daily living activities of workers employed in construction followed by generation of wastes
which may be classified as unsorted wastes of contractors' amenity areas (excluding large-size),
unsorted domestic wastes (excluding large-size), dump wells wastes (deposits) and residential
sewage, unsorted kitchen and canteen wastes.
It is foreseen to organize collection of residential sewage and surface water wastes with further
separated treatment of the above in waste treatment facilities. Wastes generated as a result of above
activities will be classified as wastes (deposits) generated during sewage water treatment.
It is anticipated that administrative complex executing construction activities management will
generate wastes classified as:
- unsorted wastes of contractors' amenity areas (excluding large-size);
- paper and cardboard wastes generated by clerical work flow.
According to safety regulations all workers should be equipped by special garments and
footwear. Scheduled exchange of special garments and footwear (roughly once every year) may
generate wastes which may be classified as:
It is assumed the during construction period wastes will be generated in the course of below
listed technological operations:
- Installation of pipelines will generate wastes classified as spent welding electrodes, welding
slag, lump impurity-free steel scrap (pipes), insulated wire and cable wastes, polypropylene (PP)
wastes (tape).
- Execution of civil and erection works on Terminal facilities assumes generation of standard
construction materials wastes: steel pipes cut-outs, stub ends of welding electrodes, welding slag,
residues of cement, concrete, masonry and plaster cement-sand mortar, steel reinforcement rods,
roofing and cladding materials, saw materials, gypsum board, brick scrap etc. Classification
construction materials is given below.
- Technical maintenance of construction equipment and vehicles followed by generation of
wastes which may be classified as spent motor oils, transmission and hydraulic liquids, oilcontaminated wiping rags, spent oil filters, spent fuel filters, spent air filters, spent lead batteries,
spent tires and wastes containing ferrous and non-ferrous metals.
It is foreseen that construction site territories will be illuminated by pole-mounted sodium
lamps. Amenity and office premises will be illuminated by luminescent lamps. Replacement of spent
mercury-containing lamps used for construction areas and amenity premises illumination will cause
generation of wastes which will be classified as mercury-containing lamps, spent mercury-containing
luminescent tubes and rejects.
Generation of considerable volume of wastes is anticipated as a result of construction camp
residents activities. Basic wastes generating activities are:
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
77
- External and internal illumination provided by luminescent lamps subject to replacement after
coming out of service and causing generation of wastes which may be classified as Mercurycontaining lamps, spent mercury-containing luminescent tubes and rejects.
- Daily living activities of workers employed in construction followed by generation of wastes
which may be classified as unsorted wastes of contractors' amenity areas (excluding large-size),
unsorted domestic wastes (excluding large-size), dump wells wastes (deposits) and residential
sewage, unsorted kitchen and canteen wastes.
It is foreseen to organize collection of residential sewage and surface water wastes with further
separated treatment of the above in waste treatment facilities. Wastes generated as a result of above
activities will be classified as wastes (deposits) generated during sewage water treatment.
It is anticipated that administrative complex executing construction activities management will
generate wastes classified as:
unsorted wastes of contractors' amenity areas (excluding large-size);
paper and cardboard wastes generated by clerical work flow.
According to safety regulations all workers should be equipped by special garments and
footwear. Scheduled exchange of special garments and footwear (roughly once every year) may
generate wastes which may be classified as:
- Cut-outs and of scraps of mixed fabrics (special garment wastes).
- Non-contaminated rubber products which lost consumptive properties (spent rubber boots),
- Leather-made work footwear which lost consumptive properties.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
78
. .
.
. .
- empty containers contaminated by antifoam agent which are generated during antifoam
containers unpacking which may be classified as polymer material wastes;
- unpacking of activated carbon generates wastes presented in the form of non-returnable
containers - steel barrels contaminated by activated carbon which may be classified as Wastes of
impurity-containing ferrous metals (steel barrels contaminated by activated carbon);
- wastes generated by packing materials are classified as Wastes of paper and card board
packing materials (non-contaminated);
- wastes generated by steel containers are classified as Wastes of ferrous metals with
impurities (steel barrels contaminated by hydroxyethylpiperazine)
Humid gas after Acid Gas Removal Unit (AGRU) is supplied to gas dryer to prevent water
freezing which may be followed by crystalline hydrates formation in the cold section. Feed has
drying may cause generation of the following wastes:
- spent cartridge filters generated during replacement of regeneration gas filter which may be
classified as spent filtering and absorption mass contaminated by hazardous substances (filter of
regeneration gas);
- spent cartridge filters generated during replacement of gas dryers after-filter which may be
classified as spent filtering and absorption mass contaminated by hazardous substances (spent
cartridge filter of dehydration plant);
- spent molecular sieves generated during replacement of gas dryers which may be classified
as spent filtering and absorption mass contaminated by hazardous substances (spent molecular
sieve);
- spent porcelain balls generated during replacement of gas dryers which may be classified as
glass wastes (gas dryers);
- spent active aluminum oxide generated during replacement of gas dryers is classified as
Spent filtering and absorption mass contaminated by hazardous substances (spent active aluminum
oxide);
- bulk bags and spillages generated during molecular sieves unpacking and may be classified as
Polymer materials wastes (bulk bags);
- barrels and PE inserts contaminated by active aluminum oxide and spillages generated during
molecular sieves unpacking and may be classified as wastes of ferrous metals with impurities (steel
barrels contaminated by aluminum oxide);
- PE and PP porcelain ball bags and spillages generated during porcelain balls unpacking which
may be classified as Polymer materials wastes (porcelain balls containing bags).
To enable replacement of adsorbent in mercury extraction vessels provision is made for bypass.
Estimated service life of adsorbent is minimum 5 years. It is assumed that mercury extraction process
may generate the following wastes:
- spent adsorbent which may be classified as activated carbon wastes non-contaminated by
hazardous impurities (spent adsorbent);
- spent porcelain balls generated during replacement of gas dryers which may be classified as
glass wastes (gas dryers);
- steel barrels contaminated by activated carbon and spillages generated during activated
carbon unpacking and may be classified as wastes of ferrous metals with impurities (steel barrels
contaminated by activated carbon);
- spent cartridge filters generated during replacement of after-filter installed on mercury
extraction vessel spent filtering and absorption mass contaminated by hazardous substances (afterfilter installed on mercury extraction vessel);
Operation of air treatment plant may generate the following wastes:
- spent glass fiber filters generated during replacement of air suction filters and dryers inlet
filters which may be classified as other solid mineral wastes (Glass fiber filters);
- spent oil filters generated during replacement of degreasing filter installed in air compression
unit which may be classified as spent filtering and absorption mass contaminated by hazardous
substances (spent oil filters );
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
79
. .
.
. .
- spent cellulose filters generated during replacement of compressed air filters installed in air
compression unit which may be classified as Paper and cardboard wastes (spent cellulose
compressed air filters);
- spent silencers generated during replacement of silencers in air compression unit which may
be classified as rockwool wastes (spent silencers);
- spent adsorbent generated during adsorbent replacement which may be classified as
Activated carbon wastes non-contaminated by hazardous impurities (spent adsorbent);
- steel barrels contaminated by activated carbon and spillages generated during activated
carbon unpacking which may be classified as wastes of ferrous metals with impurities (steel barrels
contaminated by activated carbon);
In order to provide production support provision is made for chemical storage. Chemical
storage handling may cause generation of the following wastes:
- spent amine generated during cleaning of amine drainage vessel which may be classified as
Other chemical wastes (Spent amine);
- spent cartridge filters generated during replacement of make-up amine filter which may be
classified as Polymer material wastes (make-up amine filter);
- steel barrels generated during offloading of amine used for system make-up which may be
classified as Wastes of ferrous metals with impurities (steel barrels contaminated by amine).
In order to satisfy diesel fuel requirements provision is made for diesel fuel storage. Diesel fuel
dispatched to the consumers is preliminarily treated by means of cartridge filters. Scheduled filters
replacement takes place once every month generating spent cartridge filters which may be classified
as spent filtering and absorption mass contaminated by hazardous substances (spent diesel fuel
filters).
Preparation for hot water supply will generate the following wastes:
- steel barrels contaminated by biocide generated during biocide offloading which may be
classified as wastes of ferrous metals with impurities (steel barrels contaminated by biocide);
- steel barrels contaminated by corrosion inhibitor generated during corrosion inhibitor
offloading which may be classified as wastes of ferrous metals with impurities (steel barrels
contaminated by corrosion inhibitor);
Handling of hot oil line will generate the following wastes:
- spent cartridge filters generated during replacement of hot oil filter which may be classified as
Spent filtering and absorption mass contaminated by hazardous substances (hot oil filter);
- steel oil-contaminated barrels generated during offloading of oil used for system make-up
which may be classified as wastes of ferrous metals with impurities (steel oil-contaminated barrels).
- spent heat-transfer oil generated during scheduled replacement of spent heat-transfer oil
which may be classified as Spent synthetic and mineral oils.
Handling nitrogen generation plant will generate the following wastes:
- spent PP filters generated during replacement of PP filters which may be classified as
Polymer material wastes (spent PP filters);
- spent molecular sieves generated during replacement of spent molecular sieves which may be
classified as spent filtering and absorption mass contaminated by hazardous substances (spent
molecular sieve);
- bulk bags and spillages contaminated by molecular sieve and generated during aluminum
oxide offloading which may be classified as polymer material wastes (bulk bags contaminated by
aluminum oxide).
Funtioning of the technological process zone may generate the following wastes:
- broken wood pallets generated during load handling works which may be classified as Wood
packing (non-returnable tare) made of natural wood;
- packing material wastes generated during unpacking and offloading of chemicals which may
be classified as Plastic (synthetic) tape wastes, non-contaminated.
Scheduled technical maintenance of main and auxiliary equipment (pumps, compressors,
overhead cranes) will generate the following wastes:
- spent industrial oil which may be classified as spent industrial oils;
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
80
. .
.
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
81
Process of construction will generate 45958.892 tones of wastes of hazard classes I-V - for the
entire period. Of which:
- 1st class hazard 0.592 t/period
- 2nd class hazard 2.452 t/period
- 3rd class hazard 485.519 t/period
- 4th class hazard 10384.569 t/period
- 5th class hazard 35085.760 t/period
Terminal operation will generate 271.882 tones of wastes with hazard class I-V of which:
- 1st class hazard 0.250 t/period
- 2nd class hazard 0.733 t/period
- 3rd class hazard 145.557 t/period
- 4th class hazard 124.621 t/period
- 5th class hazard 0.721 t/period
Wastes generated in the course of operation should be handed over for disposal, usage and
processed on contractual and single-letter basis by contractors holding licenses enabling them to
carry out pertinent activities.
During fulfilment of design decisions regarding construction and operation of the Terminal
provision will be made for interim wastes accumulation areas classified according to morphological
characteristics enabling separate waste collection and implementation of most useful wastes handling
procedure.
Collection, interim storage and transportation of wastes demand observance of pertinent safety,
ecological and fire safety regulations. System and technique of wastes collection, interim storage,
disposal, decontamination and burying stipulated in design decisions provide compliance with
regulatory requirements regarding environment protection against production and consumption
wastes.
All activities associated with sanitary maintenance of Terminal facilities, organization of
cleaning and maintenance of order should be carried out in conformity with approved regulations, on
regular basis and immediately after contact between wastes and environment with immediate
disposal and decontamination of wastes at specialized facilities and with observance of
environmental protection technologies.
Basic negative wastes impact on environment during construction and operation of the Object
will be exercised within terminal objects accommodating wastes disposed from the territory.
Where requirements regarding hazardous wastes accumulation, handling, disposal,
decontamination and recycling are duly observed it is expected that environmental impact will be
minimum and scheduled economic operations will be admissible.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
82
. .
.
. .
Wastes transportation should be carried out in a way excluding wastes loss, emergency
situations, impacts to environment, human health, commercial and other facilities.
Transportation of hazardous wastes is allowed by specially equipped trucks with observance of
applicable regulations.
Construction of duly equipped and safe wastes accumulation facilities is primary significant
project activity aiming to provide environmental protection against wastes impact during object
construction and operation.
Areas and methods of wastes accumulation should ensure:
- Null or minimum environmental impact of wastes, impossibility of risk or hazard to human
health caused either by local impact of high-toxicity wastes or by any probable worsening of
sanitary-epidemiological situation due to improper handling of low-toxicity organic wastes which
purpose may be achieved by:
provision of accumulation areas excluding propagation of contaminating substances contained
in the wastes;
equipping accumulation areas by containers whose type (design), dimensions and quantity
ensure maintaining of sanitary-epidemiological requirements and norms for design-required volumes
of wastes and periodicity of wastes disposal;
- Inaccessibility of high-hazard wastes for unauthorized personnel which purpose is achieved
by maintaining of proper security arrangements and limitation of access to the Terminal, namely:
provision of mechanical barrier in the form of continuous 2.5 meters high enclosure
made of profiled steel sheeting in accordance with SNiP 2.04.02-84 and RD 78.36.003-2002;
provision of additional mechanical barrier in the form of 1.5 meters high prohibited zone
fencing made of steel mesh, installed 5 meters away from main enclosure internal side and providing
traumatic (stub-cutting) impact on potential intruder (barbed-wire concertina);
provision of a single-line combined hardwire-wave alarm system across the perimeter;
provision of perimeter video monitoring facility equipped by high resolution and
sensitivity colour cameras with variofocal lens and integrated infrared lighting;
provision of perimeter security lighting enabling 3-4 meters wide continuous light trail
lengthwise the fencing;
provision of access control check points with regular staff;
- Limitation of personnel access to high-toxicity wastes which purpose is achieved by:
limitation of physical access to wastes accumulation areas;
use of premises security alarm system;
use of capped (plugged) accumulation facilities;
keeping personnel informed about wastes-caused hazards which purpose is achieved by:
training personnel to handle hazardous wastes;
provision of proper containers marking;
provision of warning signs;
- Preventing of wastes which are secondary material resources (SMR) from:
loosing their recyclable materials properties due to improper collection or storage which
purpose is achieved by:
establishment of separate SMR collection and accumulation system;
use of capped accumulation facilities;
- Minimization of wastes inflammation probability which purpose is achieved by:
observance of fire safety regulations including provision of firefighting equipment at
flammable wastes accumulation facilities;
use of capped accumulation facilities;
- Prevention of area littering which purpose is achieved by:
observance of wastes collection and accumulation regulations, namely:
provision of duly fenced open air wastes accumulation areas, provision of waste ponds
excluding wastes scattering;
- Convenience of wastes inventory and handling supervision which purpose is achieved by:
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
83
. .
. .
procedures;
walking and transport accessibility of wastes accumulation areas;
use of duly marked ponds;
regular maintaining of data reporting regarding wastes generation and accumulation in
the territory;
- Convenience of wastes disposal which purpose is achieved by proper Object territory space
planning in respect of access to wastes accumulation areas.
The following measures are foreseen where alteration of technological processes employed at
the Object cause generation of new types of wastes:
- definition of new wastes composition and hazard class, registration of wastes in the Federal
Register;
- definition of environment impacting wastes;
- supervision of environment impact norms observance in the sphere of wastes handling and
observance of wastes disposal permit together with documentation attached therewith;
- timely development (reviewing) of norms regarding wastes generation and disposal;
- analytical supervision of wastes qualitative characteristics and other environment impact
indexes (if required).
Additional organizational activities:
- Terminal construction phase:
handover of high-toxicity wastes (for decontamination) and SMR (for recycling and
utilization) approved as per classification and volumes to specialized contractors possessing pertinent
technologies and licenses for which purpose at FEED and construction preparation phase provision
should be made to seek for such contractors, evaluate their capacities and establish business
communication.
- Terminal operation phase:
assign, by entity order, persons in charge for production supervision in the sphere of
wastes handling;
train working personnel in accordance with specially developed programs to enable them
handling, collecting and separating hazardous wastes;
timely develop and submit approval the Wastes Generation and Disposal Limits Book,
obtain waste disposal limits;
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
84
. .
. .
Land plot allotted for the object entitled "Terminal for production and transshipment of
liquefied natural gas (LNG) located in the sea port of Vysotsk, Leningrad Region, with annual LNG
transshipment capacity of 660 thousand tones including branch leading from main pipeline
"Leningrad-Vyborg-State border" is located 2.5 km away from Vysotsk.
Calculation of noise pollution level for construction phase is not required because objects
subject to limitations are located at a distance over 1 km. Noise pollution levels at the nearest
residential area are not exceeding normative requirements of SN 2.2.4/2.1.8.562-96 in respect of
maximum noise levels for residential premises (55dBA).
Noise protection activities
Aiming to decrease noise pollution level during construction works execution the following
noise decreasing measures are foreseen:
selection (in order to reduce noise level) of mostly rational equipment and machines
operation mode and limitation of machines operation in proximity to residential zones;
employment of noise decreasing facilities (silencers, sound absorbing hoods etc.) for
high-noise equipment and machines.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
85
. .
. .
equip working personnel with noise and vibration protection equipment (ear sets, inserts,
helmets) and organize systematic medical examinations aiming to reveal occupational diseases;
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
86
to 20.00.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
87
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
88
. .
.
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
89
- criterion of affecting factors propagation zone boundary (on object under consideration)
admits occurrence of on-site (accident zone is not extending outside industrial or community
infrastructure facilities) and local Emergency Situations (ES) (ES zone is not extending outside
residential place, town, region).
- criterion of "humanitarian damage" on object under consideration admits occurrence of onsite (number of affected persons - maximum 10, living conditions damage of maximum 100 persons)
and local ES (number of affected persons - minimum 10 and maximum 50, living conditions damage
for minimum 100 to maximum 300 persons).
- criterion "material damage" on object under consideration admits occurrence of on-site
(material damage maximum 100 000 rubles), local (material damage minimum 100 and maximum 5
mln rubles) and regional ES (material damage minimum 5 mln rubles and maximum 500 mln rubles).
According to Appendix D to Set of Rules (SR) -11-113-2002 - the Object territory is
designated as acceptable risk zone for both criteria: "frequency of occurrence - financial loss" and
"frequency of occurrence - social injury".
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
90
. .
.
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
91
. .
.
. .
1. During object construction and operation it is required to maintain technical and designer's
supervision of construction works quality, construction works execution in compliance with design
and regulatory documentation requirements, use of certified construction equipment, materials and
technologies and observance of operation rules.
2. It is required to timely fulfill preventive and scheduled activities aiming to reveal defects
of equipment, assemblies and parts, to repair or replace them.
3. Perform monitoring of operation instructions observance, process discipline observance,
monitoring of activities aiming to extend equipment service life, timely performing of accident
recovery and repair works.
4. Perform monitoring of HSE regulations observance.
5. Maintain timely technical inspections for underground and aboveground pipelines and
shutoff valves within the Terminal, technical maintenance and repairs, check pipeline wall thickness
in areas mostly subjected to erosion and corrosion wear by NDT tools. Maintain timely technical
maintenance, scheduled and current repairs of main and auxiliary technological equipment in
compliance with manufacturers instructions and regulatory documentation specifying technical
maintenance and repair requirements.
6. Systematically check condition of technological facilities, corrosion condition of their steel
structures, foundation settlement condition, roof condition, thermal insulation and cladding glass
condition. Execute timely repairs of the above mentioned buildings and facilities.
7. In order to prevent technological pipelines and pressure vessels depressurization it is
required to check condition of safety valves and instrumentation devices, perform monitoring of
potentially hazardous elements automatically controlled parameters, exercise control over distributed
control system, over technological, warning, emergency signalling and actuating inputs.
8. Maintain operable condition and continuous readiness of fire alarm and automatic
firefighting facilities, gas accumulation alarm and automatic ventilation systems in production
premises and facilities, perform periodical actuation and/or functioning testing of stand-by and
emergency power supply and illumination systems.
9. Enter into technical maintenance contracts with equipment manufacturers to enable timely
and qualified repair of the main equipment. Timely and fully certify all equipment and materials with
the use of independent contractors services.
10. Ensure proper maintaining of design-estimate and operational documentation.
11. Maintain sufficient reserves of material-and-technical resources sufficient for accidents
elimination.
12. Regularly train, test and check personnel representing all Terminal divisions according to
dedicated accidents localization and elimination Program including defense against affecting factors
in emergency situations. Improve production personnel's professional and emergency response skills,
train personnel to act in emergency cases.
In order to timely prevent and eliminate accidents, natural disasters and catastrophes, to
coordinate activities of management bodies and facilities involved in emergency situations and to
exercise control over implementation of accident and natural disaster mitigation measures the
COMPANY established a Commission on prevention and elimination of emergency situations and
fire safety.
Commission of facility under consideration will exercise its activities as follows:
- day-to-day activities (standard production, radiation, chemical, biological etc. condition);
- higher state of readiness (deterioration of situation and anticipated ES occurrence);
- emergency situation (ES occurrence and elimination).
Functioning of ES prevention and elimination system in each of aforementioned modes
stipulates execution of particular activities aimed at:
- ES prevention;
- improvement of objects ES response capacities and setting accidents eliminating manpower
and facilities to readiness;
- salvage and rescuing of personnel life and health, mitigation of damage and losses,
localization and elimination of ES.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
92
. .
.
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
93
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
94
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
95
soil mantle;
vegetation mantle;
wildlife;
geological environments.
Monitoring is performed by means of automatically controlled stationary posts obtaining
information from measuring facilities - ground observation points, by reconnaissance surveys and by
remote observation facilities. All data obtained in the course of Production Ecology Monitoring
(PEM) are loaded into database and presented in the form of cards and summaries. Unfavourable
ecological processes are monitored over a distance up to 1 km away from Terminal boundaries.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
96
. .
. .
Monitoring should be organized in Terminal territory and on sanitary protection zone (SPZ)
boundary. Distance between pollutant emitting production facilities is not large therefore only one
sampling point within Terminal territory is provided.
Frequency of atmospheric air monitoring in Terminal territory and SPZ boundary in the course
of the year - once every quarter (March, June, September and December) (Set of Rules 2.1.7.103801).
Monitoring system should provide for continuous observation of air condition. For this purpose
it is required to analyze samples of air taken over the Terminal territory and on SPZ boundary for
content of hazardous pollutants associated with biochemical decomposition of technical and
residential wastes.
In order to measure ground level concentration of pollutants in atmosphere samples are taken at
a height of 1.5-3.5 meters above the ground surface; duration of sampling aimed to determine onetime concentration of pollutant is 20-30 minutes. Atmospheric air is sampled with the use of aspirator
pump and contained in 10 liters PTFE bags duly sealed to avoid condensation of moisture (RD
52.04.186-89. Guidance for atmosphere pollution monitoring. - L.: Gidrometizdat, 1991). Sample is
provided with accompanying tag and delivered to the laboratory for analysis. Simultaneously with
that it is required to continue performing meteorological monitoring of wind (direction and speed)
and weather conditions.
Arrangement of monitoring posts is given in Table 5.2.1.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
97
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
98
depth of ingress of particular pollutants into bottom deposits and to analyse self-purification
behaviour (GOST 17.1.5.01-80).
Bottom deposits are sampled as per GOST 17.1.5.01-80 Environment protection.
Hydrosphere. General requirements to bottom deposits sampling in water objects for pollution
analysis with the use of special equipment (PE bags, minimum volume - 1l). Where there is
propagation of pollutants (oil, oil products) on the surface and it is necessary to define the actual
degree of pollution it is required to take sample from the surface of bottom deposit simultaneously
with water sampling (especially from near bottom layer) in order to compare pollutant content in
these components.
Quantitative composition of bottom deposits is monitored as per physical-chemical
characteristics like total iron, zinc, manganese, chrome, lead, mercury, nickel, copper, , organic
substance, sulphates, chlorides, toxicity, oil and oil products.
Assessment of bottom deposits pollution in area under examination should be performed on the
basis of physical-chemical analysis data comparison with values obtained during engineeringecological survey.
Increased concentrations of pollutant under examination require repeated sampling in this
point. Validation of increased pollutant concentration requires execution of detailed examination to
reveal the cause of contamination.
Information regarding increased concentration of pollutant in the samples, accident location
and remedial activities should be transmitted to pertinent environment protection authorities.
Accident localization and elimination measures should be fulfilled according to applicable company
regulations.
Monitoring frequency is same with surface waters; sampling points are the same.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
99
investigation of waters contamination scales and dynamics in time and area, i.e.
determination of contamination propagation direction;
definition of contamination sources and timely elimination of their negative impact;
obtaining of proper reference information aiming to forecast subsurface water levels
variation and pollutants propagation.
Arrangement and number of specially drilled out observation boreholes is established
according to SNiP 2.01.28-85:
with reference to underflow slope the observation holes should be arranged in three
directions (exclusion - upstream direction);
distance between observation holes within the intake should be 50 to 100 meters; one
borehole in Terminal territory, one borehole in SPZ.
Quality of subsurface water is monitored with the use of observation boreholes arrangement in
areas anticipating potential impacts from facilities under construction (check sites) and in areas not
affected by anthropogenic impact (reference sites).
Monitoring be means of observation wells includes systematic (one-time, if applicable)
measurement of water level and temperature and water sampling for chemical analysis made on
monthly basis.
During subsurface water monitoring the observation network may be detailed or modified
depending on the results. Sampling frequency and number of chemical components under
measurement may also be varied.
Chemical analyses should be performed by certified laboratories only.
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
100
. .
.
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
101
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
102
Table 5.7.1 - Estimated areas of monitoring of exogenic geological processes in the area of
object
Site No.
1
2
3
4
Sampling point
30 meters from Terminal eastern
boundary
30 meters from Terminal
southern boundary
30 meters from Terminal western
boundary
30 meters from Terminal
northern boundary
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
103
. .
. .
Duration of steady state noise measurement should be minimum 3 minutes. In each point it is
required to make minimum 3 sound level samplings (octave levels of the sound pressure).
Measurement of noise in the open territory may not be held in condition of precipitations or
wind over 5 m/s. With wind velocity between 1 and 5 m/s it is required to use a microphone wind
protecting screen .
During noise measurements it is not allowed to subject measuring equipment to vibration,
magnetic and electric fields, radioactive radiation and other adverse factors which may affect
measurement results.
For hygienic assessment of noises - practically interesting is sound range 45 -11000 Hz which
includes eight octave bands with geometric mean frequencies 63, 125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000
and 8000 Hz.
Observance of sanitary norms stipulating parameters and admissible levels of noise at
workplaces is monitored by bodies and agencies of RF State Committee for Sanitary and
Epidemiological Oversight in conformity with RF Law Concerning the Sanitary and
Epidemiological Welfare of the Population dated 19.04.1991 and in accordance with applicable
sanitary regulations and norms.
In the event of excess of maximum permissible noise level in Terminal territory provisions
should be made to limit the noise impact in conformity with company regulations.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
104
6 CONSLUSION
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
105
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
106
. .
.
. .
26. GOST 17.4.3.04-85. Environmental Protection. Soils. General Requirements to Control and
Protection Against Contamination.
27. GOST 17.5.1.01-83. Environmental Protection. Lands. Recultivation of Lands. Terms and
Definitions.
28. GOST 17.5.1.02-83. Environmental Protection. Lands. Classification of Disturbed Lands for
Recultivation.
29. GOST 17.5.1.03-86. Environmental Protection. Lands. Classification of Overburden and
Surrounding Rock for Biological Recultivation of Lands.
30. GOST 17.5.1.06-84. Environmental Protection. Lands. Classification of Low-Yield Agricultural
Lands for Earth Mulching.
31. GOST 17.5.3.04-83. Environmental Protection. Lands. General Requirements to Recultivation of
Lands.
32. GOST 17.5.3.05-84. Environmental Protection. Lands. Recultivation of Lands. General
Requirements to Earth Mulching.
33. GOST 17.5.3.06-85. Environmental Protection. Lands. Recultivation of Lands. Requirements to
Determining rates of Removal of Topsoil During Earthworks.
34. MU 2.1.7.730-99. Hygienic Requirements to Quality of Soil of Conglomerations.
35. SanPiN 2.1.7.1287-03. Sanitary and Epidemiological Requirements to Soil Quality (appr. by the
Chief State Medical Officer of the Russian Federation, dated April 16, 2003).
36. SanPiN 42-128-4433-87 Sanitary Standards of Allowable Concentrations of Chemical Agents in
Soil (appr. by the Deputy Chief State Medical Officer of the USSR, dated October 30, 1987).
37. GN 2.1.7.2041-06. Maximum Allowable Concentrations (MAC) of Chemical Agents in Soil.
38. GN 2.1.7. 2511-09. Approximate Allowable Concentrations (AAC) of Chemical Agents in Soil.
39. GN 6229-91 List of Maximum Allowable Concentrations (MAC) and Approximate Allowable
Concentrations (AAC) of Chemical Agents in Soil.
40. Directive of Mayor of Saint-Petersburg No. 891-r dated 30.08.1994 On Introduction of
Regional Established Standard on Soils Protection in Saint-Petersburg.
41. 2.6.1.2398-08 "Radiation Monitoring and Sanitary-Epidemiological Estimation of Plots for
Construction of Residential Buildings, Public and Industrial Facilities as Related to Radiological
Safety" (as approved by hief Sanitary Officer of the Russian Federation G.G. Onischenko on
July 2, 2008).
42. SanPiN 2.6.1.2523-09 "Safety Radiation Level" (-99/2009).
43. 2.6.1.2612-10 "Basic Sanitary Rules for Radiation Safety (99/2010)".
44. Methodological Recommendations for Estimation of Radiation Situation in Residential Areas,
Ministry of Health of the USSR, 1990;
45. 2.6.1.1292-03 "Hygienic Requirements for Limitation of Exposure of the Population to
Radiation through Natural Sources of Ionizing Radiation;
46. 4109-86 "Methodological Instructive Regulations on Defining Electromagnetic Fields of
High Voltage Overhead Lines and Hygienic Requirements for their Allocation".
47. SanPiN 2.2.4.1191-03 "Electromagnetic Fields in a Production Environment".
48. SanPiN 2.1.6.1032-01 "Hygienic Requirements for Atmospheric Air Quality Assurance for
Populated Areas" (as approved by hief Sanitary Officer of the Russian Federation on May 17,
2001.)
49. "List of Methods of Calculating Contaminating Substances Atmospheric Emissions Used in 2014
for Regulation and Estimating the Values of Contaminating Substances Emissions" as approved
by acting Director General of OJSC "Atmosfera" Scientific-Research Institute on February 4,
2014.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
107
. .
.
. .
50. 1-84 "Policy and Procedure for Consideration, Coordination and Evaluation of Air
Protection Measures and Issue of Air Emission Permits in accordance with Design
Considerations". (The USSR State Hydrometeorology Committee Decree dated April 23, 1984).
51. -86. Methodology of Estimating the Concentration of Hazardous Substances Contained in
Industrial Atmospheric Emissions (The USSR State Hydrometeorology Committee Decree dated
August 4, 1986, No. 192).
52. Procedure of Taking Inventory of Contaminating Substances Atmospheric Emissions for Motor
Transport Enterprises (computational method) (as approved by the Russian Federation Ministry
of Transportation Order dated October 28, 1998).
53. Methodological Rationale for Estimation, Regulation and Control of Contaminating Substances
Emissions in Atmospheric Air, "Atmosfera" Scientific-Research Institute, St. Petersburg, 2005.
54. List and Codes of Substances Contaminating Atmospheric Air. Edition No.6, revised and
enlarged, St. Petersburg, 2008. ("Atmosfera" Scientific-Research Institute, A. I. Sysin ScientificResearch Institute of Human Ecology and Environmental Health, the Russian State Medical
University, "Integral" Business Enterprise).
55. (Hygienic Standard) 2.1.6.1338-03 "Maximum Permissible Concentration of Contaminating
Substances in Atmospheric Air in Populated Areas".
56. 2.1.6.1983-05 Maximum Permissible Concentration of Contaminating Substances in
Atmospheric Air in Populated Areas. Amendments No. 2 to 2.1.6.1338-03.
57. 2.1.6.2326-08 (Amendment 4 to "Maximum Permissible Concentration of Contaminating
Substances in Atmospheric Air in Populated Areas. 2.1.6.1338-03").
58. 2.1.6.2309-07 Safe Reference Levels of Impact of Contaminating Substances in Atmospheric
Air in Populated Areas.
59. 52.04.52-85 Methodological Instructive Regulations. Emission Control in Unfavorable
Meteorological Conditions.
60. GOST 17.2.1.01-76. Environmental Protection. Atmosphere. Classification of Emissions
according to their Composition.
61. GOST 17.2.1.03-84. Environmental Protection. Atmosphere. Terms and Definitions for Pollution
Control.
62. GOST 17.2.1.04-77. Environmental Protection. Atmosphere. Meteorological Aspects of Pollution
and Industrial Emissions. General Terms and Definitions.
63. GOST 17.2.3.02-78. Environmental Protection. Atmosphere. Rules of Estimating the Allowable
Level of Hazardous Substances Emission by Industrial Facilities.
64. GOST 17.2.4.02-81. Environmental Protection. Atmosphere. General Requirements for Methods
of Defining Contaminating Substances.
65. Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation No.344 dated June 12, 2003 On
Established Standards of Payment for Emissions of Contaminants into Atmosphere by Stationary
and Mobile Sources, Discharges of Contaminants into Surface and Subterranean Water Bodies,
Arrangement of Production and Consumption Wastes
66. Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 410 dated July 1, 2005 On
Introducing Amendments into Appendix No.1 to the Resolution of the Government of the
Russian Federation No.344 dated June 12, 2003.
67. Water Quality Standards for Water Bodies of Commercial Fishing Importance, Including
Standards for Maximum Allowable Concentrations of Harmful Substances in Waters of Water
Bodies of Commercial Fishing Importance. (Appr. by the Order of Russian Federal Fisheries
Agency No. 20 dated 18.01.2010).
68. SanPiN 2.1.5.980-00 Conglomerations Sewerage System, Sanitary Protection of Water Bodies.
Hygienic Requirements to Surface Waters Protection (appr. by the Chief State Medical Officer
of the Russian Federation, dated June 22, 2000).
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
108
. .
.
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
109
. .
. .
88. 2.2.4/2.1.8.562-96 Workplace Noise, Noise in Residential and Public buildings and in
Residential Construction Areas.
89. SNiP 23-03-2003 Noise Protection.
90. 23-103-2003 "Design of Acoustic Insulation of Enclosing Structures for Residential and
Public Buildings"
91. SNiP 2.07.01-89* "Urban Construction. Planning and Construction of Urban and Rural
Settlements".
92. SNiP 31-01-2003 "Residential Apartment Buildings".
93. 4.3.2194-07 "Control of Noise Levels in Residential Buildings Areas and in Residential
and Public Buildings and Accommodations".
94. SanPiN 2.2.3.1384-03. Hygienic Requiremens to Organization of Construction Operations and
Construction Works (Appr. by by the Chief State Medical Officer of the Russian Federation,
dated June 11, 2003).
95. 1.1.1058-01 "Organization and Performance of Industrial Control of Sanitary Requirements
Fulfillment and Implementation of Sanitary-Antiepidemic (Preventive) Measures".
96. RDS 82-202-96. Rules for Development and Application of Standards of Difficult-to-Recover
Losses and Wastes of Materials in Cinstruction.
97. Collected Volume of Typical Standards of Losses of Material Resources in Construction
(Supplement to RDS 82-202-96).
98. SNiP 12-01-2004. Organization of Construction.
99. The Order of Estimating Contaminating Substances Emission Sources Subject to Recording and
Regulating (as approved by Order No. 579 dated December 31, 2010).
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
110
APPENDICES
Appendix 1. Certificate of permit for certain type or types of works
Self-regulated organization based on the membership of persons effecting preparation of design
documentation for capital construction objects
NON-COMMERCIAL PARTNERSHIP
Designers of North-West
68, Vsevolozhsky Ave., 188640 Vsevolozhsk, Leningrad region. Registration number in State
Register of Self-Regulated Organizations --016-12082009
www.pr-nw.ru
Saint-Petersburg
CERTIFICATE
of permit for certain type or types of works, which influence the safety of capital construction
objects
01-08-13-102--016
Issued to a member of self-regulated organization:
Limited Liability Company
"Design Institute "Petrokhim-Tekhnologiya"
PSRN 1027804182284, TIN 7806115994, letter , 4, Kantemirovskaya Str., 197342 SaintPetersburg
Decision of Board of NP Designers of North-West, minutes of
meeting No.20 dated August 01, 2013.
Authority for issuing Certificate:
This Certificate is to confirm admission to works specified in the Annex to this Certificate, which
influence the safety of capital construction objects.
Takes effect since August 01, 2013.
. .
. .
D.S.Davydov
S.N.Chusov
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
111
Page 1 of 3
ANNEX
to Certificate of permit for certain type or
types of works, which influence the safety
of capital construction objects
No. 01-08-13-102--016
dated August 01, 2013
2. Extremely dangerous and sophisticated capital construction objects (except for nuclear
facilities). A member of noncommercial partnership Designers of North-West Limited Liability
Company "Design Institute "Petrokhim-Tekhnologiya" is provided with Certificate of
admission to such works.
No.
1.
3. Capital construction objects (except for extremely dangerous and sophisticated capital
construction objects, nuclear facilities). A member of noncommercial partnership Designers of
North-West Limited Liability Company "Design Institute "Petrokhim-Tekhnologiya" is
provided with Certificate of admission to such works.
No.
2.
3.
. .
. .
1.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
112
Page 2 of 3
4.
7.
8.
PROTECTION.
10. WORKS ON PREPARING PROJECTS OF MEASURES ON ENSURING FIRE SAFETY
9.
5.
. .
. .
6.
10.
11.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
113
Page 3 of 3
Limited Liability Company "Design Institute "Petrokhim-Tekhnologiya" is entitled to close
agreements for performing works organization: Works on organizing preparation of design
documentation by an invited developer or customer on the basis of agreement by a legal entity or
private entrepreneur (general design contractor), which cost will not exceed 25 (twenty five)
mln.RUR according to one agreement.
D.S.Davydov
Director
S.N.Chusov
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
114
APPROVED
Director General
Kriogaz CJSC
_________________ R.Rudnitsky
__ __________ 2014
Requirements Specification
for development of sections and fulfillment of works as part of design documentation Terminal
for production and transfer of liquefied natural gas at Vysotsk port of Leningrad region featuring
throughput capability of 600 thous. tons of LNG per year, including gas pipeline from main gas
pipeline Leningrad-Vyborg-State Border
Object description
2.
Purpose of work
3.
. .
. .
1.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
115
4.
5.
Object location
6.
Object characteristic
7.
8.
9.
Construction type
Customer
Design organization
General design contractor
10. Design organization
Subcontractor
. .
. .
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
116
12.
13.
. .
. .
14.
15.
16.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
117
. .
Requirements to work
results as per Stage 2
18.
Requirements to work
content as per Stage 3
19.
Requirements to work
results as per Stage 3
. .
17.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
118
20.1.
Seeking approvals of design documentation (as regards
materials of evaluation of impact on aquatic biological resources) from
FAF.
20.2.
Seeking approvals of planned activity from FAF shall be
carried out for the following stages:
Stage I;
21.
22.
21.1.
Approval of FAF for design documentation for Stage I;
21.2.
Approval of FAF for design documentation for Stages II and
III;
22.1.
Technical support of design documentation related to the
objects of State Expert Appraisal Department during SEEA
performance up to receiving a positive report, including:
23.
23.1.
Positive SEE report on DD for Stage I;
23.2.
Positive SEE report on DD for Stages II and III with regard to
hydraulic engineering installations.
24.
25.
24.1.
Technical support during passing state examination of the
design documentation developed in accordance with Stage 3 of this
Requirements Specification, including:
24.1.1. support of documentation and materials during
expert examination (including urgent removal of possible
remarks on the part of expert commission);
24.1.2. in case of getting negative report of
Glavgosekspertiza updating documentation and materials
subject to expert assessment taking into account received
comments and repeated filing of documents for expert
appraisal.
Absence of remarks on the part of expert of Glavgosekspertiza
according to this design examination.
26.
26.1.
General information on enterprise.
26.2.
Departmental peculiarities of production of a designed object
and brief technological characteristic of production.
26.3.
Title-establishing documents for plots of land, object
arrangement, city development plan
26.4.
Results of engineering surveys (engineering-geological,
engineering- hydrometeorological, engineering-ecological surveys
regarding marine and ground sections)
. .
. .
20.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
119
26.5.
Content of design documentation, standard for completion
26.6.
Sections of design documentation:
26.6.1. Explanatory note.
26.6.2. Land plot layout diagram, including: general layout plan;
diagram of site space planning in form*.dwg, land use distribution
(technical and economic performance according to general layout),
balance of cut and fill.
26.6.3. Architectural solutions (Explanatory note and drawings).
26.6.4. Constructional and space-planning solutions, including
hydroengineering solutions on mandatory basis (Explanatory note
and drawings).
26.6.5. Information on engineering equipment, on networks of
engineering and technical support, list of engineering and technical
measures, content of technological solutions (system of power
supply, heat supply, water supply and water discharge, systems of
heating and ventilation, technological solutions).
26.6.6. Arrangement of construction project, including:
technology and stage-by-stage approach to production of work,
volumes of work, (including hydrotechnical works), list of
demanded basic construction materials and resources, list of
demanded construction equipment, including waterborne vehicles
for implementation of hydrotechnical works, work schedule,
information on quantity of construction personnel, information on
engineering provision of construction site (water supply, water
discharge, power supply), layout and location plan with
explication (soft copy, form - *.dwg).
26.6.7. Information on possible emergency situations, measures
on preventing emergency situations, types of possible accidents,
areas of influence thereof (section of CD & ES), OSR operations
plan.
26.6.8. Noise characteristics of process and auxiliary equipment
(separation screens, classificators, pumps, transformers, etc.),
ventilation equipment.
26.6.9. Information on bunkering in the period of construction
and operation.
26.6.10. Maps of current directions of the area of object location,
map of depths.
26.6.11. Information on receiving domestic and industrial (bilge)
effluent water from vessels during construction and operation.
Special conditions
27.1.
Contractor coordinates Programs and results of engineering
and ecological surveys
27.2.
Customer provides a Contractor with documentation and
true information required for fulfilling obligations
27.3.
Contractor supports processes of approval and expert
appraisal of expected SPZ design in the corresponding governmental
bodies necessary due to requirements of the effective environmentoriented and sanitary legislation of RF
. .
. .
27.
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
120
28.
27.4.
Payment for conducting approvals and expert appraisals of
expected SPZ design in governmental bodies necessary due to
requirements of the effective environment-oriented and sanitary
legislation of RF will be effected by a Customer.
27.5.
Payment for publication of announcements in the mass media
about conducting public hearings a swell as for leasing of premises for
conducting hearings will be effected by a Customer.
27.6.
Filing design documentation and materials for SEEA will be
effected by a Customer.
27.7.
Payment for conducting state environmental appraisals will be
effected by a Customer.
The following will be submitted to a Customer:
28.1.
Requirements Specification for conducting assessment of
impact on environment in hard copy and on electronic media in
form*.PDF and *.DOC;
28.2.
Materials on preliminary assessment of impact on environment
in hard copy and on electronic media in forms*.PDF, *.DOC and
*.DWG;
28.3.
Materials on preliminary assessment of impact on environment
in hard copy and on electronic media in forms *.PDF, *.DOC and
*.DWG;
28.4.
SPZ design approved in Federal Service on Surveillance for
Consumer rights protection and human well-being authorities in hard
copy and on electronic media in forms*.PDF, *.DOC and *.DWG;
28.5.
Section 8 LMEP for Stage I in hard copy and on electronic
media in forms *.PDF, *.DOC and *.DWG;
28.6.
Section 8 LMEP for Stage II in hard copy and on electronic
media in forms *.PDF, *.DOC and *.DWG;
28.7.
Section 8 LMEP for Stage III in hard copy and on electronic
media in forms *.PDF, *.DOC and *.DWG.
Requirements to reporting
documentation
S.Yu. Dobrovolsky
FOR CONTRACTOR:
Director General of PI Petrokhimtekhnologiya LLC
_______________ / .V. Korablin /
__ _______________2014
Stamp here
. .
. .
FOR CUSTOMER:
Director General of Kriogaz PJSC
_______________ / R.Rudnitsky /
__ _______________2014
Stamp here
.N. Vasheva
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
121
E
11
SE
9
SW
20
W
11
NW
11
still air
7
Head of SI
Saint-Petersburg HMEC-R
Y.D. Malashin
Performed by:
E.V. Potapova
328-13-61
. .
. .
S
16
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
122
0.011
1.8
0.056
. .
. .
Y.D. Malashin
Drozd
phone (812) 329 92 83
-80.0-5.4/0.0115-06-
. .. No. .
.
123