Adderley V State of Fla - Effect of An Ignorant Public

87 S.Ct.
242
385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149
(Cite as: 385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242)
2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
Page 1
87 S.Ct. 242
385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149
(Cite as: 385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242)
Supreme Court of the United States

Harriett Louise ADDERLEY et al., Petitioners,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA.
No. 19.
Page 2
protest against jail and other segregation policies had

denied them their rights of free speech, assembly, petition,
and due process of law and equal protection.
U.S.C.A.Const. Amend. 14.
[2] Trespass 386
77
Argued Oct. 18, 1966.

Decided Nov. 14, 1966.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1967.
386 Trespass
386III Criminal Responsibility
386k77 k. Statutory Provisions. Most Cited Cases
(Formerly 110k13.1(2.5), 110k13.1(2), 110k13)
See 385 U.S. 1020, 87 S.Ct. 698.
Florida trespass statute cannot be challenged on the
grounds of vagueness as it is aimed at conduct of one
Prosecutions for trespass with a malicious and limited kind, that is for one person or persons to trespass
mischievous intent. The County Judge's Court of Leonupon the property of another with a malicious and
County, entered judgments of conviction and themischievous intent, and there is no lack of notice in this
defendants appealed. On appeal the convictions werestatute and nothing to trap or fool the unwary. F.S.A.
affirmed by the Circuit Court for Leon County and then 821.18.
by the Florida District Court of Appeals, 175 So.2d 249,
and certiorari was granted. The Supreme Court, Mr.[3] Trespass 386
80
Justice Black, held that the arrest and subsequent
convictions for violation of Florida statute on trespass
386 Trespass
with malicious and mischievous intent of student
demonstrators who had entered jail grounds to protest
386k80 k. Malicious, Willful, or Wanton Trespass.
prior arrests and city segregation policies and who
Most Cited Cases
blocked for vehicular travel a driveway to jail entrance
The requirement of Florida statute that the trespass be
not normally used by the public and who did not disperse
with malicious and mischievous intent does not broaden
after being warned by sheriff did not deprive them of their
the scope of trespass so as to make it cover a multitude of
constitutional rights to freedom of speech, press,
types of conduct as does the common-law breach-ofassembly, or petition.
peace charge; on the contrary, the requirement narrows
the scope of the offense. F.S.A. 821.18.
Affirmed.
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Chief Justice Warren, Mr. Justice
Brennan and Mr. Justice Fortas dissented.
[4] Trespass 386
84
386 Trespass
West Headnotes
386k84 k. Defenses. Most Cited Cases
Florida prosecution for an alleged trespass on jail grounds
[1] Federal Courts 170B
506
with malicious and mischievous intent was not abated by
Civil Rights Act of 1964 regardless of fact that the act of
trespass was a means of protesting segregation of public
170B Federal Courts
accommodations establishments covered by the Act.
170BVII Supreme Court
170BVII(E) Review of Decisions of State Courts F.S.A. 821.18; Civil Rights Act of 1964, 201 et seq.,
170Bk504 Nature of Decisions or Questions42 U.S.C.A. 2000a et seq.
Involved
170Bk506 k. Criminal Matters; Habeas[5] Criminal Law 110
37.10(1)
Corpus. Most Cited Cases
(Formerly 106k397)
110 Criminal Law
Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether
110II Defenses in General
the convictions of petitioners for trespass following their
110k36.5
Official
Action,
Inaction,
87 S.Ct. 242
385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149
(Cite as: 385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242)
Page 3
Representation, Misconduct, or Bad Faith

110k37.10 Discriminatory or Selective[9] Constitutional Law 92
1431
Prosecution
110k37.10(1) k. In General. Most Cited
92 Constitutional Law
Cases
92XIV Right of Assembly
(Formerly 110k700(1), 110k700)
92k1431 k. Government Property. Most Cited
Petty criminal statutes may not be used to violate
Cases
minorities' constitutional rights.
(Formerly 92k274.1(5), 92k274)
[6] Constitutional Law 92
4693
Constitutional Law 92
1435
92XXVII Due Process
92XV Right to Petition for Redress of Grievances
92XXVII(H) Criminal Law
92k1435 k. In General. Most Cited Cases
92XXVII(H)5 Evidence and Witnesses
(Formerly 92k274.1(5), 92k274)
92k4693 k. Weight and Sufficiency of
Evidence. Most Cited Cases
Constitutional Law 92
1846
(Formerly 92k266(7), 92k266)
State convictions based on a total lack of relevant
evidence would be a denial of due process.
92XVIII Freedom of Speech, Expression, and Press
92XVIII(K) Protests and Demonstrations in
[7] Trespass 386
88
General
92XVIII(K)1 In General
386 Trespass
92k1846 k. Government Property and
Facilities. Most Cited Cases
386k88 k. Evidence. Most Cited Cases
(Formerly 92k274.1(5), 92k274)
Testimony showing that university students protesting
prior arrests of fellow students and city segregation
84
policies entered jail grounds and blocked for vehicular Trespass 386
traffic a driveway to a jail entrance not normally used by
public and were warned that they would be arrested for 386 Trespass
trespass if they did not leave and that some did not do so
and were arrested authorized jury to find that every
386k84 k. Defenses. Most Cited Cases
essential element of the crime of trespass with malicious
(Formerly 92k274.1(5))
and mischievous intent under Florida statute had beenThe arrest and subsequent convictions for violation of
proved with respect to persons who had not left. F.S.A. Florida statute on trespass with malicious and
821.18.
mischievous intent of student demonstrators who had
entered jail grounds to protest prior arrests and city
segregation policies and who blocked for vehicular travel
[8] Federal Courts 170B
404
a driveway to a jail entrance not normally used by the
public and who did not disperse after being warned by
170B Federal Courts
sheriff did not deprive them of their constitutional rights
170BVI State Laws as Rules of Decision
to freedom of speech, press, assembly, or petition. F.S.A.
170BVI(C) Application to Particular Matters
821.18; U.S.C.A.Const. Amend. 14.
170Bk404 k. Arrest and Search; Criminal Law
and Procedure. Most Cited Cases
[10] Trespass 386
81
(Formerly 106k366(27))
The Florida court's definition of the Florida statute on
trespass with malicious and mischievous intent was386 Trespass
binding on the United States Supreme Court. F.S.A.
821.18.
386k81 k. Trespass After Warning or Notice. Most
87 S.Ct. 242
385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149
(Cite as: 385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242)
Page 4
Cited Cases
protesting students the day before, and perhaps to protest
Nothing in United States Constitution prevented Floridamore generally against state and local policies and
from an even-handed enforcement of its general trespasspractices of racial segregation, including segregation of
statute against those refusing to obey sheriff's order tothe jail. The county sheriff, legal custodian of the jail and
remove themselves from what amounted to the curtilage jail grounds, tried to persuade the students to leave the jail
of the jail house, as state no less than a private property grounds. When this did not work, he notified them that
owner had power to preserve property under its control they must leave, that if they did not leave he would arrest
for the use to which it was lawfully dedicated. F.S.A. them for trespassing, and that if they resisted he would
821.18.
charge them with that as well. Some of the students left
but others, including petitioners, remained and they were
arrested. On appeal the convictions **244 were affirmed
[11] Constitutional Law 92
1498
by the Florida Circuit Court and then by the Florida
District Court of Appeal, 175 So.2d 249. That being the
highest state court to which they could appeal, petitioners
92XVIII Freedom of Speech, Expression, and Press
applied to us for certiorari *41 contending that, in view of
92XVIII(A) In General
petitioners' purpose to protest against jail and other
92XVIII(A)1 In General
segregation policies, their conviction denied them rights
92k1498 k. Absolute Nature of Right. Most
of free speech, assembly, petition, due process of law and
Cited Cases
equal protection of the laws as guaranteed by the
(Formerly 92k90(3), 92k90.1(1))
Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United
Persons who want to propagandize protests or views do
States. On this Question Presented we granted
not have a constitutional right to do so whenever and
certiorari. 382 U.S. 1023, 86 S.Ct. 643, 15 L.Ed.2d 538.
however and wherever they please.
Petitioners present their argument on this question in four
separate points, and for convenience we deal with each of
[12] States 360
88
their points in the order in which they present them.
360 States
360III Property, Contracts, and Liabilities
360k88 k. Control and Regulation of Public
Buildings and Places. Most Cited Cases
United States Constitution does not forbid a state to
control the use of its own property for its own lawful
nondiscriminatory purpose.
**243 *39 Richard Yale Feder, Miami, Fla., for
petitioners.
FN1. Every trespass upon the property of

another, committed with a malicious and
mischievous intent, the punishment of which is
not specially provided for, shall be punished by
imprisonment not exceeding three months, or by
fine not exceeding one hundred dollars. Fla.Stat.
s 821.18, F.S.A. (1965).
I.
*40 William D. Roth, Tallahassee, Fla., for respondent, Petitioners have insisted from the beginning of this case
pro hac vice, by special leave of Court.
that it is controlled by and must be reversed because of
our prior cases of Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court. 229, 83 S.Ct. 680, 9 L.Ed.2d 697, and Cox v. State of
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536, 559, 85 S.Ct. 453, 476, 13
[1] Petitioners, Harriett Louise Adderley and 31 otherL.Ed.2d 471, 487. We cannot agree.
persons, were convicted by a jury in a joint trial in the
County Judge's Court of Leon County, Florida, on a The Edwards case, like this one, did come up when a
charge of trespass with a malicious and mischievous number of persons demonstrated on public property
intent upon the premises of the county jail contrary to sagainst their State's segregation policies. They also sang
821.18 of the Florida statutes set out below.FN1 Petitioners,hymns and danced, as did the demonstrators in this case.
apparently all students of the Florida A. & M. University But here the analogies to this case end. In Edwards, the
in Tallahassee, had gone from the school to the jail about demonstrators went to the South Carolina State Capital
a mile away, along with many other students, to grounds to protest. In this case they went to the jail.
demonstrate at the mail their protests of arrests of other Traditionally, state capitol grounds are open to the public.
87 S.Ct. 242
385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149
(Cite as: 385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242)
Page 5
Jails, built for security purposes, are not. The petitioners have not argued that this definition, set out
demonstrators at the South Carolina Capital went inbelow,FN2 is not a reasonable and clear definition of the
through a public driveway and as they entered they wereterms. The use of these terms in the statute, instead of
told by state officials there that they had a right as citizens contributing to uncertainty and misunderstanding, actually
to go through the State House grounds as long as theymakes its meaning more understandable and clear.
were peaceful. Here the demonstrators entered the jail
grounds through a driveway used only for jail purposes
FN2. Malicious' means wrongful, you
and without warning to or permission from the sheriff.
remember back in the original charge, the State
More importantly, South Carolina sought to prosecute its
has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt there
State Capital demonstrators by charging them with the
was a malicious and mischievous intent. The
common-law crime of breach of the peace. *42 This
word malicious' means that the wrongful act
Court in Edwards took pains to point out at length the
shall be done voluntarily, unlawfully and without
indefinite, loose, and broad nature of this charge; indeed,
excuse or justification. The word malicious' that
this Court pointed out, 372 U.S. at p. 237, 83 S.Ct. at p.
is used in these affidavits does not necessarily
684, that the South Carolina Supreme Court had itself
allege nor require the State to prove that the
declared that the breach of the peace charge is not
defendant had actual malice in his mind at the
susceptible of exact definition. South Carolina's power to
time of the alleged trespass. Another way of
prosecute, it was emphasized, 372 U.S. at p. 236, 83 S.Ct.
stating the definition of malicious' is by
at p. 684 would have been different had the State
malicious' is meant the act was done knowingly
proceeded under a precise and narrowly drawn
and willfully and without any legal justification.
regulatory statute evincing a legislative judgment that
certain specific conduct be limited or proscribed such as,
Mischievous,' which is also required, means
for example, limiting the periods during which the State
that the alleged trespass shall be inclined to
House grounds were open to the public * * *. The South
cause petty and trivial trouble, annoyance and
Carolina breach-of-the-peace statute was thus struck
vexation to others in order for you to find that
down as being so broad and all-embracing as to
the alleged trespass was committed with
jeopardize speech, press, assembly and petition, under the
mischievous intent.' R. 74.
constitutional doctrine enunciated in Cantwell v. State of
Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 307-308, 60 S.Ct. 900, 904II.
905, 84 L.Ed. 1213 and followed in many subsequent
cases. And it was on this same ground of vagueness that
in Cox v. State of Louisiana, supra, 379 U.S. at 551-552, [4] Petitioners in this Court invoke the doctrine of
85 S.Ct. at 462-463, the Louisiana Breach-of-the-peaceabatement announced by this Court in Hamm v. City of
Rock Hill, 379 U.S. 306, 85 S.Ct. 384, 13 L.Ed.2d 300.
law used to prosecute Cox was invalidated.
But that holding was that the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78
[2] The Florida trespass statute under which these Stat. 241, which made it unlawful for places of public
petitioners were charged cannot be challenged on this accommodation to deny service to any person because of
ground. It is aimed at conduct of one limited kind, that is, race, effected an abatement of prosecutions of persons for
for one person or persons to trespass upon the property ofseeking such services that arose prior to the passage of the
another with a malicious and mischievous intent. There is Act. But this case in no way involves prosecution of
no lack of notice in this law, nothing to entrap or fool the petitioners for seeking service in establishments covered
by the Act. It involves only an alleged trespass on jail
unwary.
grounds-a trespass which can be prosecuted regardless of
the fact that it is the means of protesting segregation of
[3] Petitioners seem to argue that the Florida trespass law establishments covered by the Act.
is void for vagueness because it requires a trespass **245
to be with a malicious and mischievous intent * * *. But
*44 III.
these words do not broaden the scope of trespass so as to
make it cover a multitude of types of conduct as does the
common-law breach- of- the- peace charge. On the [5] Petitioners next argue that petty criminal statutes may
contrary, these words narrow the scope of the offense. *43not be used to violate minorities' constitutional rights.
The trial court charged the jury as to their meaning and This of course is true but this abstract proposition gets us
87 S.Ct. 242
385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149
(Cite as: 385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242)
nowhere in deciding this case.
Page 6
anything to disperse the crowd, and one of them told the

sheriff that they wanted to get arrested. A local minister
talked with some of the demonstrators and told them not
IV.
to enter the jail, because they could not arrest themselves,
[6] Petitioners here contend that Petitioners' convictions but just to remain where they were. After about 10
are based on a total lack of relevant evidence. If true, this minutes, the sheriff, in a voice loud enough to be heard by
would be a denial of due process under Garner v.all, told the demonstrators that he was the legal custodian
Louisiana, 368 U.S. 157, 82 S.Ct. 248, 7 L.Ed.2d 207, andof the jail and its premises, that they were trespassing on
Thompson v. City of Louisville, 362 U.S. 199, 80 S.Ct.county property in violation of the law, that they should
624, 4 L.Ed.2d 654. Both in the petition for certiorari and all leave forthwith or he would arrest them, and that if
in the brief on the merits petitioners state that their they attempted to resist arrest, he would charge them with
summary of the evidence does not conflict with the facts that as a separate offense. Some of the group then left.
contained in the Circuit Court's opinion which was inOthers, including all petitioners, did not leave. Some of
effect affirmed by the District Court of Appeal. 175 So.2dthem sat down. In a few minutes, realizing that the
249. That statement is correct and petitioners' summary ofremaining demonstrators had no intention of leaving, the
facts, as well as that of the Circuit Court, shows an sheriff ordered his deputies to surround those remaining
abundance of facts to support the jury's verdict of guilty on jail premises and placed them, 107 demonstrators,
under arrest. The sheriff unequivocally testified that he
in this case.
did not arrest any persons other than those who were on
the jail premises. Of the three petitioners testifying, two
In summary both these statements show testimony ample insisted that they were arrested before they had a chance
to prove this: Disturbed and upset by the arrest of their to leave, had they wanted to, and one testified that she did
schoolmates the day before, a large number of Florida A. not intent to leave. The sheriff again explicitly testified
& M. students assembled on the school grounds and that he did not arrest any person who was attempting to
decided to march down to the county jail. Some leave.
apparently wanted to be put in jail too, along with the
students already there.FN3 A group of **246 around
FN3. The three petitioners who testified insisted
200marched *45 from the school and arrived at the jail
that they had not come to the jail for the purpose
singing and clapping.FN4 They went directly to the jailof being arrested. But both the sheriff and a
door entrance where they were met by a deputy sheriff,
deputy testified that they heard several of the
evidently surprised by their arrival. He asked them to
demonstrators present at the jail loudly proclaim
move back, claiming they were blocking the entrance to
their desire to be arrested. Indeed, this latter
the jail and fearing that they might attempt to enter the
version is borne out by the fact that, though
jail. They moved back part of the way, where they stood
assertedly protesting the prior arrests of their
or sat, singing, clapping and dancing on the jail driveway
fellow students and the city's segregation
and on an adjacent grassy area upon the jail premises.
policies, none of the demonstrators carried any
This particular jail entrance and driveway were not
signs and upon arriving at the jail, no speeches or
normally used by the public, but by the sheriff's
other verbal protests were made.
department for transporting prisoners to and from the
courts several blocks away and by commercial concerns
FN4. There is no evidence that any attempt was
for servicing the jail. Even after their partial retreat, the
made by law enforcement officers to interfere
demonstrators continued to block vehicular passage over
FN5
with this march, or, for that matter, that such
this driveway up to the entrance of the jail. Someone
officers even knew of the march or its ultimate
called the sheriff who was at the moment apparently
destination.
conferring with one of the state court judges about
incidents connected with prior arrests for demonstrations.
When the sheriff returned to the jail, he immediately
FN5. Although some of the petitioners testified
inquired if all was safe inside the jail and was told it was.
that they had no intention of interfering with
He then engaged in a conversation with two of the *46
vehicular traffic to and from the jail entrance and
leaders. He told them that they were trespassing upon jail
that they noticed no vehicle trying to enter or
property and that he would give them 10 minutes to leave
leave the driveway, the deputy sheriff testified
or he would arrest them. Neither of the leaders did
that it would have been impossible for
87 S.Ct. 242
385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149
(Cite as: 385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242)
Page 7
automobiles to drive up to the jail entrance and 564, 85 S.Ct. at 464 and 480.FN7 We reject it again. The
that one serviceman, finished with his business United States Constitution does not forbid a State to
in the jail, waited inside because the control the use of its own property for its own lawful
demonstrators were sitting around and leaningnondiscriminatory purpose.
against his truck parked outside. The sheriff
testified that the time the demonstrators were
FN6. In Cox v. State of Louisiana, supra, 379
there, between 9:30 and 10 Monday morning,
U.S. at 558, 85 S.Ct. at 466, the Court
was generally a very busy time for using the jail
emphasized: It is, of course, undisputed that
entrance to transport weekend inmates to the
appropriate, limited discretion, under properly
courts and for tradesmen to make service calls at
drawn statutes or ordinances, concerning the
the jail.
time, place, duration, or manner of use of the
streets for public assemblies may be vested in
**247 [7][8][9][10][11][12] Under the foregoing
administrative officials, provided that such
testimony the jury was authorized to find that the State
limited discretion is exercised with uniformity
had proven every essential element of the crime, as it was
of method of treatment upon the facts of each
defined by the state court. That interpretation is, of
application, free from improper or inappropriate
course, binding on us, leaving only the question of
considerations and from unfair discrimination *
whether conviction of the state offense, thus defined,
* * (and with) a systematic, consistent and just
unconstitutionally deprives petitioners of their rights to
order of treatment, with reference to the
freedom of speech, press, assembly or petition. We hold it
convenience of public use of the highways * *
does not. The sheriff, as jail custodian, *47 had power, as
*.
the state courts have here held, to direct that this large
crowd of people get off the grounds. There is not a shred
FN7. The rights of free speech and assembly,
of evidence in this record that this power was exercised,
while fundamental in our democratic society, still
or that its exercise was sanctioned by the lower courts,
do not mean that everyone with opinions or
because the sheriff objected to what was being sung or
beliefs to express may address a group at any
said by the demonstrators or because he disagreed with
public place and at any time. The constitutional
the objectives of their protest. The record reveals that he
guarantee of liberty implies the existence of an
objected only to their presence on that part of the jail
organized society maintaining public order,
grounds reserved for jail uses. There is no evidence at all
without which liberty itself would be lost in the
that on any other occasion had similarly large groups of
excesses of anarchy. * * * A group of
the public been permitted to gather on this portion of the
demonstrators could not insist upon the right to
jail grounds for any purpose.FN6 Nothing in the
cordon off a street, or entrance to a public or
Constitution of the United States prevents Florida from
private building, and allow no one to pass who
even-handed enforcement of its general trespass statute
did not agree to listen to their exhortations. 379
against those refusing to obey the sheriff's order to
U.S., at 554-555, 85 S.Ct., at 464.
remove themselves from what amounted to the curtilage
of the jailhouse. The State, no less than a private owner of
The conduct which is the subject of this statuteproperty, has power to preserve the property under its
picketing and parading-is subject to regulation
control for the use to which it is lawfully dedicated. For
even though intertwined with expression and
this reason there is no merit to the petitioners' argument
association. The examples are many of the
that they had a constitutional right to stay on the property,
application by this Court of the principle that
over the jail custodian's objections, because this area
certain forms of conduct mixed with speech may
chosen for the peaceful civil rights demonstration was not
be regulated or prohibited. Id., at 563, 85 S.Ct.,
only reasonable but also particularly appropriate * * *.'
at 480.
Such an argument has as its major unarticulated premise
the assumption *48 that people who want to propagandize
protests or views have a constitutional right to do so These judgments are affirmed.
whenever and however and wherever they please. That
concept of constitutional law was vigorously and Affirmed.
forthrightly rejected in two of the cases petitioners rely
on, Cox v. State of Louisiana, supra, at 554-555 and 563-
87 S.Ct. 242
385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149
(Cite as: 385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242)
Page 8
**248 Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom THE CHIEF held, it is an obvious center for protest. The right to
JUSTICE, Mr. Justice BRENNAN, and Mr. Justice petition for the redress of grievances has an ancient
FORTAS concur, dissenting.
historyFN2 and *50 is not limited to writing a letter**249
The First Amendment, applicable to the States by reason or sending a telegram to a congressman; it is not confined
of the Fourteenth ( Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S.to appearing before the local city council, or writing
229, 235, 83 S.Ct. 680, 683), provides that Congressletters to the President or Governor or Mayor. See
shall make no law * * * abridging * * * the right of the NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415, 429-431, 83 S.Ct. 328,
people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the 335-336, 9 L.Ed.2d 405. Conventional methods of
Government for a redress of grievances. These rights, petitioning may be, and often have been, shut off to large
along with religion, speech, and press, are preferred rightsgroups of our citizens. Legislators may turn deaf ears;
of the Constitution, made so by reason of that explicit formal complaints may be routed endlessly through a
guarantee and *49 what Edmond Cahn in Confrontingbureaucratic maze; courts may let the wheels of justice
Injustice (1966) referred to as The Firstness of the First grind very slowly. Those who do not control television
Amendment.'FN1 With all respect, therefore, the Court errs *51 and radio, those who cannot afford to advertise in
in treating the case as if it were an ordinary trespass case newspapers or circulate elaborate pamphlets may have
or an ordinary picketing case.
only a more limited type of access to public officials.
Their methods should not be condemned as tactics of
FN1. Where would we really find the principal obstruction and harassment as long as the assembly and
danger to civil liberty in a republic? Not in the petition are peaceable, as these were.
governors as governors, not in the governed as
governed, but in the governed unequipped to
FN2. The historical antecedents of the right to
function as governors. The chief enemies of
petition for the redress of grievances run deep,
republican freedom are mental sloth, conformity,
and strike to the heart of the democratic
bigotry, superstition, credulity, monopoly in the
philosophy. C. 61 of the Magna Carta provided:
market of ideas, and utter, benighted ignorance.
Relying as it does on the consent of the
(T)hat if we or our justiciar, or our bailiffs, or
governed, representative government cannot
any of our servants shall have done wrong in any
succeed unless the community receives enough
way toward any one, or shall have transgressed
information to grasp public issues and make
any of the articles of peace or security and the
sensible decisions. As lights which may have
wrong shall have been shown to four barons of
been enough for the past do not meet the needs
the aforesaid twenty-five barons, let those four
of the present, so present lights will not suffice
barons come to us or to our justiciar, if we are
for the more extensive and complex problems of
out of the kingdom, laying before us the
the future. Heretofore public enlightenment may
transgression, and let them ask that we cause that
have been only a manifest desideratum; today it
transgression to be corrected without delay.
constitutes an imperative necessity. The First
Sources of Our Liberties 21 (Perry ed. 1959).
Amendment, says Justice Black, reflects the
faith that a good society is not static but
The representatives of the people vigorously
advancing, and that the fullest possible
exercised the right in order to gain the initiative
interchange of ideas and beliefs is essential to
in legislation and a voice in their government.
attainment of this goal. (From Feldman v.
See Pollard, The Evolution of Parliament 329United States, 322 U.S. 487, 501, 64 S.Ct. 1082,
331 (1964). By 1669 the House of Commons had
1088, 88 L.Ed. 1408 (dissenting opinion).)'
resolved that it is an inherent right of every
Cahn, supra, p. 102.
commoner of England to prepare and present
The jailhouse, like an executive mansion, a legislative
chamber, a courthouse, or the statehouse itself (Edwards
v. South Carolina, supra) is one of the seats of
governments whether it be the Tower of London, the
Bastille, or a small county jail. And when it houses
political prisoners or those who many think are unjustly
Petitions to the house of commons in case of

grievance, and That no court whatsoever hath
power to judge or censure any Petition presented
* * *. 4 Parl.Hist.Eng. 432-433 (1669). The Bill
of Rights of 1689 provided That it is the right of
the subjects to petition the king and all
commitments and prosecutions for such
87 S.Ct. 242
385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149
(Cite as: 385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242)
Page 9
petitioning are illegal. Adams & Stephens,interference with persons or vehicles going to or coming
Select Documents of English Constitutional from the jail. Indeed, it is undisputed that the sheriff and
History 464. The right to petition for a redress ofdeputy sheriff, in *52 separate cars, were able to drive up
grievances was early asserted in the Colonies.the driveway to the parking places near the entrance and
The Stamp Act Congress of 1765 declared That that no one obstructed their path. Further, it is undisputed
it is the right of the British subjects in thesethat the entrance to the jail was not blocked. And
colonies, to petition the king or either house of whenever the students were requested to move they did
parliament. Sources of Our Liberties 271 (Perryso. If there was congestion, the solution was a further
ed. 1959). The Declaration and Resolves of the request to move to lawns or parking areas, not complete
First Continental Congress, adopted October 14, ejection and arrest. The claim is made that a tradesman
1774, declared that Americans have a right waited inside the jail because some of the protestants
peaceably to assemble, consider their grievances, were sitting around and leaning on his truck. The only
and petition the king; and that all prosecutions, evidence supporting such a conclusion is the testimony of
prohibitory proclamations, and commitments for a deputy sheriff that the tradesman came to the door * * *
the same, are illegal. Id., at 288. The Declarationand then did not leave. His remaining is just as consistent
of Independence assigned as one of the reasons with a desire to satisfy his curiosity as it is with a
for the break from England the fact that Ourrestraint. Finally, the fact that some of the protestants may
repeated Petitions have been answered only byhave felt **250 their cause so just that they were willing
repeated injury. The constitutions of four of the to be arrested for making their protest outside the jail
original States specifically guaranteed the right. seems wholly irrelevant. A petition is nonetheless a
Mass.Const., Art. 19 (1780); Pa.Const., Art. IX, spetition, though its futility may make martyrdom
20 (1790); N.H.Const., Art. 32 (1784);attractive.
N.C.Const., Art. 18 (1776).
We do violence to the First Amendment when we permit
There is no question that petitioners had as their purpose a this petition for redress of grievances' to be turned into a
protest against the arrest of Florida A. & M. students for trespass action. It does not help to analogize this problem
trying to integrate public theatres. The sheriff's testimony to the problem of picketing. Picketing is a form of protest
indicates that he well understood the purpose of the rally. usually directed against private interests. I do not see how
The petitioners who testified unequivocally stated that therules governing picketing in general are relevant to this
group was protesting the arrests, and state and local express constitutional right to assemble and to petition for
policies of segregation, including segregation of the jail. redress of grievances. In the first place the jailhouse
This testimony was not contradicted or even questioned. grounds were not marked with NO TRESPASSING!
The fact that no one gave a formal speech, that no signs, nor does respondent claim that the public was
elaborate handbills were distributed, and that the group generally excluded from the grounds. Only the sheriff's
was not laden with signs would seem to be immaterial. fiat transformed lawful conduct into an unlawful trespass.
Such methods are not the sine qua non of petitioning for To say that a private owner could have done the same if
the redress of grievances. The group did sing freedom the rally had taken place on private property is to speak of
songs. And history shows that a song can be a powerful a different case, as an assembly and a petition for redress
tool of protest. See Cox v. State of Louisiana, 379 U.S. of grievances run to government, not to private
536, 546-548, 85 S.Ct. 453, 459-460. There was noproprietors.
violence; no threat of violence; no attempted jail break;
no storming of a prison; no plan or plot to do anything but*53 The Court forgets that prior to this day our decisions
protest. The evidence is uncontradicted that thehave drastically limited the application of state statutes
petitioners' conduct did not upset the jailhouse routine;inhibiting the right to go peacefully on public property to
things went on as they normally would. None of the group exercise First Amendment rights. As Mr. Justice Roberts
entered the jail. Indeed, they moved back from thewrote in Hague v. C.I.O., 307 U.S. 496, 515-516, 59 S.Ct.
entrance as they were instructed. There was no shoving, 954, 964, 83 L.Ed. 1423:
no pushing, no disorder or threat of riot. It is said that
some of the group blocked part of the driveway leading to * * * Wherever the title of streets and parks may rest,
the jail entrance. The chief jailer, to be sure, testified that they have immemorially been held in trust for the use of
vehicles would not have been able to use the driveway.the public and, time out of mind, have been used for
Never did the students locate themselves so as to cause
87 S.Ct. 242
385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149
(Cite as: 385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242)
Page 10
purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between from saying that the custodian of the public property in
citizens, and discussing public questions. Such use of the his discretion can decide when public places shall be used
streets and public places has, from ancient times, been afor the communication of ideas, especially the
part of the privileges, immunities, rights, and liberties of constitutional right to assemble and petition for redress of
citizens. The privilege of a citizen of the United States to grievances. See Hague v. C.I.O. supra; Schneider v. State
use the streets and parks for communication of views on of New Jersey, 308 U.S. 147, 163-164, 60 S.Ct. 146, 151,
national questions may be regulated in the interest of all; 84 L.Ed. 155; Cantwell v. State of Connecticut, 310 U.S.
it is not absolute, but relative, and must be exercised in 296, 60 S.Ct. 900; Largent v. State of Texas, 318 U.S.
subordination to the general comfort and convenience, 418, 63 S.Ct. 667, 87 L.Ed. 873; Niemotko v. State of
and in consonance with peace and good order; but it must Maryland, 340 U.S. 268, 71 S.Ct. 325, 95 L.Ed. 267;
not, in the guise of regulation, be abridged or denied.
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 382 U.S. 87, 86
S.Ct. 211, 15 L.Ed.2d 176. For to place such discretion in
Such was the case of Edwards v. South Carolina, where any public official, be he the custodian of the public
aggrieved people peaceably assembled at the site of the property or the local police commissioner (cf. Kunz v.
State Government to express their grievances to the People of State of New York, 340 U.S. 290, 71 S.Ct. 312,
citizens of the State as well as to the legislature. 372 U.S.,95 L.Ed. 280), is to place those who assert their First
at 235, 83 S.Ct., at 683. Edwards was in the tradition ofAmendment rights at his mercy. It gives him the awesome
Cox v. State of New Hampshire, 312 U.S. 569, 61 S.Ct. power to decide whose ideas may be expressed and who
762, 85 L.Ed. 1049, where the public streets were said to shall be denied a place to air their claims and petition
be immemorially associated with the right of assemblytheir government. Such power is out of step with all our
and the opportunities for the communication of thought decisions prior to *55 today where we have insisted that
and the discussion of public questions. Id., at 574, 61before a First Amendment right may be curtailed under
S.Ct., at 765. When we allow Florida to construe herthe guise of a criminal law, any evil that may be collateral
malicious trespass' statute to bar a person from going on to the exercise of the right, must be isolated and defined
property knowing it is not his own and to apply that in a narrowly drawn statute ( Cantwell v. State of
prohibition to public property, we discard Cox and Connecticut, supra, at 307, 60 S.Ct. at 904) lest the power
Edwards. Would the case be any different if, as is to control excesses of conduct be used to suppress the
common, the demonstration took place outside a building constitutional right itself. See Stromberg v. People of
which housed both the jail and the legislative body? I State of California, 283 U.S. 359, 369, 51 S.Ct. 532, 535,
75 L.Ed. 1117; Herndon v. Lowry, 301 U.S. 242, 258-259,
think not.
57 S.Ct. 732, 739, 81 L.Ed. 1066; Edwards v. South
*54 There may be some public places which are so clearly Carolina, supra, 372 U.S. at 238, 83 S.Ct. at 684;
committed to other purposes that their use for the airing of N.A.A.C.P. v. Button, supra, 371 U.S. at 433, 83 S.Ct. at
grievances is anomalous. There may be some instances in 338.
which assemblies and petitions for redress of grievances
are not consistent with other necessary purposes of public That tragic consequence happens today when a trespass
property. A noisy **251 meeting may be out of keepinglaw is used to bludgeon those who peacefully exercise a
with the serenity of the statehouse or the quiet of the First Amendment right to protest to government against
courthouse. No one, for example, would suggest that the one of the most grievous of all modern oppressions which
Senate gallery is the proper place for a vociferous protest some of our States are inflicting on our citizens.
rally. And in other cases it may be necessary to adjust the
right to petition for redress of grievances to the other What we do today disregards the admonition in De Jonge
interests inhering in the uses to which the public property v. State of Oregon, 299 U.S. 353, 364-365, 57 S.Ct. 255,
is normally put. See Cox v. State of New Hampshire, 260, 81 L.Ed. 278:
supra; Poulos v. State of New Hampshire, 345 U.S. 395,
73 S.Ct. 760, 97 L.Ed. 1105. But this is quite different These (First Amendment) rights may be abused by using
from saying that all public places are off limits to people speech or press or assembly in order to incite to violence
with grievances. See Hague v. C.I.O., supra; Cox v. Stateand crime. The people through their Legislatures may
of New Hampshire, supra; Jamison v. State of Texas, 318protect themselves against that abuse. But the legislative
U.S. 413, 415-416, 63 S.Ct. 669, 671, 87 L.Ed. 869; intenvention can find constitutional justification only by
Edwards v. South Carolina, supra. And it is farther yet dealing with the abuse. The rights themselves must not be
87 S.Ct. 242
385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149
(Cite as: 385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242)
curtailed. The greater the importance of safeguarding the

community from incitements to the overthrow of our
institutions by force and violence, the more imperative is
the need to preserve inviolate the constitutional rights of
free speech, free press and free assembly in order to
maintain
the
opportunity
for
free
political
discussion,**252 to the end that government may be
responsive to the will of the people and that changes, if
desired, may be obtained by peaceful means. Therein lies
the security of the Republic, the very foundation of
constitutional government.
Page 11
the streets, and camped mostly in parks and other

public lands in the District, Virginia, and
Maryland only to be routed by the Army. See
Waters, B.E.F. (1933).
FN4. See, e.g., De Jonge v. State of Oregon, 299
U.S. 353, 57 S.Ct. 255; Feiner v. People of State
of New York, 340 U.S. 315, 71 S.Ct. 303, 95
L.Ed. 267; Niemotko v. State of Maryland, 340
U.S. 268, 71 S.Ct. 325, 95 L.Ed. 267; Edwards v.
South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229, 83 S.Ct. 680; Cox
v. State of Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536, 85 S.Ct. 453;
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 382 U.S.
87. The same is true of other measures which
inhibit First Amendment rights. See, e.g.,
N.A.A.C. P. v. State of Alabama, 357 U.S. 449,
78 S.Ct. 1163, 2 L.Ed.2d 1488; Bates v. City of
Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516, 80 S.Ct. 412, 4
L.Ed.2d 480; Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 81
S.Ct. 247, 5 L.Ed.2d 231; N.A.A.C.P. v. Button,
371 U.S. 415, 83 S.Ct. 328. If the invalidity of
regulations and official conduct curtailing First
Amendment rights turned on an unequivocal
showing that the measure was intended to inhibit
the rights, protection would be sorely lacking. It
is not the intent or purpose of the measure but its
effect on First Amendment rights which is
crucial.
*56 Today a trespass law is used to penalize people for

exercising a constitutional right. Tomorrow a disorderly
conduct statute, a breach-of-the-peace statute, a vagrancy
statute will be put to the same end. FN3 It is said that the
sheriff did not make the arrests because of the views
which petitioners espoused. That excuse is usually given,
as we know from the many cases involving arrests of
minority groups for breaches of the peace, unlawful
assemblies, and parading without a permit. The charge
against William Penn, who preached a nonconformist
doctrine in a street in London, was that he caused a great
concourse and tumult of people and contempt of the King
and to the great disturbance of his peace. 6 How.St.Tr.
951, 955. That was in 1670. In modern times, also, such
arrests are usually sought to be justified by some
legitimate function of government.FN4 Yet by allowing
these orderly and civilized protests against injustice to be
suppressed, we only increase the forces of frustration U.S.Fla. 1966.
which the conditions of second-class citizenship are Adderley v. State of Fla.
generating amongst us.
385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149
FN3. In 1932 over 28,000 veterans demanding a END OF DOCUMENT
bonus marched on Washington, D.C., paraded
2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Date of Printing: Aug 21, 2010

KEYCITE
Adderley v. State of Fla., 385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149 (U.S.Fla.,Nov 14, 1966) (NO. 19)
History
Direct History
1 Adderley v. State, 175 So.2d 249 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. May 11, 1965) (NO. G-196)
Certiorari Granted by
2 Adderley v. Florida, 382 U.S. 1023, 86 S.Ct. 643, 15 L.Ed.2d 538 (U.S.Fla. Jan 31, 1966) (NO. 506)
AND Judgment Affirmed by
=>
3 Adderley v. State of Fla., 385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149 (U.S.Fla. Nov 14, 1966) (NO.
19)
Rehearing Denied by
4 Adderley v. Florida., 385 U.S. 1020, 87 S.Ct. 698, 17 L.Ed.2d 559 (U.S.Fla. Jan 09, 1967) (NO. 19)
Negative Citing References (U.S.A.)

Distinguished by
5 In re Berry, 58 Cal.Rptr. 722 (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Apr 12, 1967) (NO. CR. 4421)
6 Wolin v. Port of New York Authority, 268 F.Supp. 855 (S.D.N.Y. May 03, 1967) (NO. 66 CIV 4396)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
7 Globe Newspaper Co. v. Bork, 370 F.Supp. 1135 (D.Mass. Feb 12, 1974) (NO. CIV. 73-3748-G)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
8 Clifford v. Moritz, 472 F.Supp. 1094 (S.D.Ohio Jun 19, 1979) (NO. C-2-79-414)
HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
9 Townsend v. Carmel, 494 F.Supp. 30 (D.D.C. Dec 20, 1979) (NO. 79-0746)
10 City of Antioch v. Candidates' Outdoor Graphic Service, 557 F.Supp. 52 (N.D.Cal. Oct 15, 1982)
(NO. C-82-0731-WWS, C-82-0832-WWS)
11 Olivieri v. Ward, 613 F.Supp. 616 (S.D.N.Y. Jun 13, 1985) (NO. 85 CIV. 3269 (CBM))
12 State v. Shelton, 63 Ohio App.3d 137, 578 N.E.2d 473 (Ohio App. 4 Dist. May 09, 1989) (NO. 697,
8559)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
13 Kreimer v. Bureau of Police for Town of Morristown, 958 F.2d 1242, 60 USLW 2607 (3rd Cir.(N.J.)
Mar 23, 1992) (NO. 91-5501), rehearing denied (Apr 21, 1992)
HN: 7 (S.Ct.)
14 Pouillon v. City of Owosso, 206 F.3d 711, 2000 Fed.App. 0093P (6th Cir.(Mich.) Mar 16, 2000)
(NO. 98-1967)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
15 People v. Mendelson, 15 Misc.3d 925, 834 N.Y.S.2d 445, 2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 27137 (N.Y.Dist.Ct.
Apr 04, 2007) (NO. 2006NA00602)
Limitation of Holding Recognized by
16 Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC, 528 U.S. 377, 120 S.Ct. 897, 145 L.Ed.2d 886, 68
USLW 4102, 00 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 548, 2000 Daily Journal D.A.R. 857, 2000 CJ C.A.R. 462,
2000 CJ C.A.R. 463, 2000 CJ C.A.R. 468, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 75 (U.S.Mo. Jan 24, 2000) (NO.
98-963)
Court Documents
Appellate Court Documents (U.S.A.)
U.S. Appellate Briefs

17 Adderley v. Florida, 1966 WL 100632 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug. 25, 1966) Brief for Petitioners
(NO. 19)

KEYCITE
Adderley v. State of Fla., 385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149 (U.S.Fla., Nov 14, 1966) (NO. 19)

KEYCITE
Adderley v. State of Fla., 385 U.S. 39, 87 S.Ct. 242, 17 L.Ed.2d 149 (U.S.Fla. Nov 14, 1966) (NO. 19)
Citing References
Negative Cases (U.S.A.)
Distinguished by
1 People v. Mendelson, 834 N.Y.S.2d 445, 451, 15 Misc.3d 925, 932, 2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 27137,
27137 (N.Y.Dist.Ct. Apr 04, 2007) (NO. 2006NA00602)
2 Pouillon v. City of Owosso, 206 F.3d 711, 716, 2000 Fed.App. 0093P, 0093P (6th Cir.(Mich.) Mar
16, 2000) (NO. 98-1967)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
3 Kreimer v. Bureau of Police for Town of Morristown, 958 F.2d 1242, 1262, 60 USLW 2607, 2607
(3rd Cir.(N.J.) Mar 23, 1992) (NO. 91-5501)
HN: 7 (S.Ct.)
4 State v. Shelton, 578 N.E.2d 473, 475+, 63 Ohio App.3d 137, 139+ (Ohio App. 4 Dist. May 09,
1989) (NO. 697, 8559)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
5 Olivieri v. Ward, 613 F.Supp. 616, 622 (S.D.N.Y. Jun 13, 1985) (NO. 85 CIV. 3269 (CBM))
6 City of Antioch v. Candidates' Outdoor Graphic Service, 557 F.Supp. 52, 56 (N.D.Cal. Oct 15, 1982)
(NO. C-82-0731-WWS, C-82-0832-WWS)
7 Townsend v. Carmel, 494 F.Supp. 30, 33+ (D.D.C. Dec 20, 1979) (NO. 79-0746)
8 Clifford v. Moritz, 472 F.Supp. 1094, 1098+ (S.D.Ohio Jun 19, 1979) (NO. C-2-79-414) "
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
9 Globe Newspaper Co. v. Bork, 370 F.Supp. 1135, 1138 (D.Mass. Feb 12, 1974) (NO. CIV. 73-3748G)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
10 Wolin v. Port of New York Authority, 268 F.Supp. 855, 859+ (S.D.N.Y. May 03, 1967) (NO. 66 CIV
4396)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
11 In re Berry, 58 Cal.Rptr. 722, 722+ (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Apr 12, 1967) (NO. CR. 4421)
Limitation of Holding Recognized by

12 Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC, 120 S.Ct. 897, 899+, 528 U.S. 377, 378+, 145 L.Ed.2d
886, 886+, 68 USLW 4102, 4102+, 00 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 548, 548+, 2000 Daily Journal D.A.R.
857, 857+, 2000 CJ C.A.R. 462, 462+, 2000 CJ C.A.R. 463, 463+, 2000 CJ C.A.R. 468, 468+, 13
Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 75, 75+ (U.S.Mo. Jan 24, 2000) (NO. 98-963)
Positive Cases (U.S.A.)

Examined
13 U. S. Postal Service v. Council of Greenburgh Civic Associations, 101 S.Ct. 2676, 2685+, 453 U.S.
114, 129+, 69 L.Ed.2d 517, 517+, 7 Media L. Rep. 1505, 1505+ (U.S.N.Y. Jun 25, 1981) (NO. 80608) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
14 Grace v. Burger, 665 F.2d 1193, 1200+, 214 U.S.App.D.C. 375, 382+ (D.C.Cir. Sep 08, 1981) (NO.
80-2044) " HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
15 Jeannette Rankin Brigade v. Chief of the Capitol Police, 421 F.2d 1090, 1093+, 137 U.S.App.D.C.
155, 158+ (D.C.Cir. Jun 20, 1969) (NO. 21566) HN: 2,7,9 (S.Ct.)
Discussed
16 Heffron v. International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc., 101 S.Ct. 2559, 2564+, 452 U.S. 640,
647+, 69 L.Ed.2d 298, 298+, 7 Media L. Rep. 1489, 1489+ (U.S.Minn. Jun 22, 1981) (NO. 80-795)
HN: 9,11 (S.Ct.)
17 Greer v. Spock, 96 S.Ct. 1211, 1217+, 424 U.S. 828, 836+, 47 L.Ed.2d 505, 505+ (U.S.N.J. Mar 24,
1976) (NO. 74-848) " HN: 7,9,11 (S.Ct.)
18 Grayned v. City of Rockford, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 2303+, 408 U.S. 104, 116+, 33 L.Ed.2d 222, 222+
(U.S.Ill. Jun 26, 1972) (NO. 70-5106) HN: 4,7,9 (S.Ct.)
19 Amalgamated Food Emp. Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc., 88 S.Ct. 1601, 1609+, 391
U.S. 308, 320+, 20 L.Ed.2d 603, 603+, 68 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2209, 2209+, 57 Lab.Cas. P 12,681,
12681+ (U.S.Pa. May 20, 1968) (NO. 478) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
20 Knolls Action Project v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL), 771 F.2d 46, 50+ (2nd Cir.(N.Y.)
Aug 26, 1985) (NO. 1168, 85-6040) " HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
21 Connecticut State Federation of Teachers v. Board of Ed. Members, 538 F.2d 471, 478+, 92
L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3011, 3011+, 80 Lab.Cas. P 53,877, 53877+ (2nd Cir.(Conn.) May 21, 1976) (NO.
720, 75-7436) HN: 9,11 (S.Ct.)
22 U.S. v. Bjerke, 796 F.2d 643, 647+ (3rd Cir.(Pa.) Jul 10, 1986) (NO. 85-3653) " HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
23 International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority,
691 F.2d 155, 159+ (3rd Cir.(N.J.) Oct 15, 1982) (NO. 81-3051) "
24 American Future Systems, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State University, 618 F.2d 252, 255+ (3rd Cir.(Pa.)
Apr 03, 1980) (NO. 79-1440) " HN: 1,10 (S.Ct.)
25 Warren v. Fairfax County, 196 F.3d 186, 190+ (4th Cir.(Va.) Oct 13, 1999) (NO. 98-1059) " HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
26 Sword v. Fox, 446 F.2d 1091, 1095+ (4th Cir.(Va.) Jul 01, 1971) (NO. 15391) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
27 Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Com'n, 688 F.2d 1033, 1042+, 66 A.L.R. Fed. 585, 585+,
52 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 935, 935+, 8 Media L. Rep. 2305, 2305+ (5th Cir.(Ala.) Oct 15, 1982) (NO.
80-7546, 81-2011) " HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
28 Chicago Area Military Project v. City of Chicago, 508 F.2d 921, 925+ (7th Cir.(Ill.) Jan 08, 1975)
(NO. 74-1475) " HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
29 Persons for Free Speech at SAC v. U.S. Air Force, 675 F.2d 1010, 1015+ (8th Cir.(Neb.) Apr 28,
1982) (NO. 81-1608) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
30 Planned Parenthood of Southern Nevada, Inc. v. Clark County School Dist., 887 F.2d 935, 940+, 56
Ed. Law Rep. 757, 757+, 17 Media L. Rep. 1065, 1065+ (9th Cir.(Nev.) Oct 11, 1989) (NO. 882659) " HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
31 Daniel v. City of Tampa, Fla., 38 F.3d 546, 549+, 63 USLW 2342, 2342+ (11th Cir.(Fla.) Nov 23,
1994) (NO. 93-3356, 93-3553) " HN: 2,9,10 (S.Ct.)
32 Mahoney v. Babbitt, 105 F.3d 1452, 1458+, 323 U.S.App.D.C. 120, 126+ (D.C.Cir. Jan 19, 1997)
(NO. 97-5005) " HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
33 Women Strike for Peace v. Morton, 472 F.2d 1273, 1283+, 153 U.S.App.D.C. 198, 208+ (D.C.Cir.
Jul 14, 1972) (NO. 24913) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
34 Business Executives' Move for Vietnam Peace v. F.C.C., 450 F.2d 642, 660+, 22 Rad. Reg. 2d (P &
F) 2089, 2089+, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 181, 199+ (D.C.Cir. Aug 03, 1971) (NO. 24492, 24537) " HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
35 Devine v. Wood, 286 F.Supp. 102, 105+ (M.D.Ala. Jun 21, 1968) (NO. CIV. 2617-N) HN: 3,9
(S.Ct.)
36 Wesner v. County of Napa, 2008 WL 5170188, *2+ (N.D.Cal. Dec 09, 2008) (NO. C 08-03377JSW)
HN: 1,9 (S.Ct.)
37 U. S. v. Akeson, 290 F.Supp. 212, 215+ (D.Colo. Sep 25, 1968) (NO. CRIM. 68-CR-115) " HN: 9,11
(S.Ct.)
38 U.S. v. Cooper, 279 F.Supp. 253, 256+ (D.Colo. Feb 14, 1968) (NO. CRIM. 67-CR-203) " HN: 10
(S.Ct.)
39 Longo v. U.S. Postal Service, 761 F.Supp. 220, 227+ (D.Conn. Apr 08, 1991) (NO. CIV. H-88-557
(AHN)) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
40 U.S. v. Gilbert, 720 F.Supp. 1554, 1559+ (N.D.Ga. Jun 22, 1989) (NO. CIV A 1:88-CV-27-JTC) "
HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
41 Zanders v. Louisiana State Bd. of Ed., 281 F.Supp. 747, 763+ (W.D.La. Mar 08, 1968) (NO. CIV.
13427) HN: 7 (S.Ct.)
42 Cameron v. Johnson, 262 F.Supp. 873, 878+ (S.D.Miss. Dec 24, 1966) (NO. CIV. 1891(H)) " HN:
2,9 (S.Ct.)
43 Hodgson v. Liquor Salesmen's Union, Local No. 2, 334 F.Supp. 1369, 1379+, 78 L.R.R.M. (BNA)
2020, 2020+, 65 Lab.Cas. P 11,899, 11899+ (S.D.N.Y. May 17, 1971) (NO. 70 CIV. 2497) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
44 Barrett v. Kunzig, 331 F.Supp. 266, 273+ (M.D.Tenn. Aug 11, 1971) (NO. CIV. 6193) " HN: 1,9,10
(S.Ct.)
45 International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness v. Schrader, 461 F.Supp. 714, 717+ (N.D.Tex. May 05,
1978) (NO. CIV CA-3-77-1329-G) " HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
46 Fardig v. Municipality of Anchorage, 803 P.2d 879, 882+ (Alaska App. Dec 14, 1990) (NO. A-2900,
A-2901, 1096) " HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
47 In re Hoffman, 64 Cal.Rptr. 97, 101+, 434 P.2d 353, 357+, 67 Cal.2d 845, 852+ (Cal. Dec 11, 1967)
(NO. CR 11026) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
48 Family Planning Alternatives, Inc. v. Pruner, 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 316, 323+ (Cal.App. 6 Dist. Dec 07,
1992) (NO. H008862) " HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
49 Downer v. State, 375 So.2d 840, 844+ (Fla. Sep 20, 1979) (NO. 51726, 51727, 57825) " HN: 4,7,9
(S.Ct.)
50 Johnson v. State, 315 So.2d 169, 170+ (Fla. Jun 25, 1975) (NO. 46516) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
51 Grody v. State, 278 N.E.2d 280, 284+, 257 Ind. 651, 657+ (Ind. Feb 10, 1972) (NO. 1270S294) HN:
7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
52 Anderson v. State, 278 A.2d 439, 443+, 12 Md.App. 186, 194+ (Md.App. Jun 07, 1971) (NO. 463) "
HN: 2,3 (S.Ct.)
53 People v. Deutsch, 172 N.W.2d 392, 396+, 19 Mich.App. 74, 82+ (Mich.App. Aug 27, 1969) (NO.
5767) " HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
54 State v. McCormack, 682 P.2d 742, 745+, 101 N.M. 349, 352+ (N.M.App. Apr 12, 1984) (NO. 5732)
HN: 1,9 (S.Ct.)
55 Gold-Greenberger v. Human Resources Admin. of City of New York, 552 N.Y.S.2d 328, 330+, 154
A.D.2d 124, 128+, 59 Ed. Law Rep. 167, 167+ (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Mar 02, 1990) (NO. 3355E) HN:
10 (S.Ct.)
56 Gordon v. Walkley, 344 N.Y.S.2d 233, 237+, 41 A.D.2d 493, 496+ (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept. Jun 07, 1973) "
HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
57 Matter of Clive W., 441 N.Y.S.2d 188, 194+, 109 Misc.2d 788, 796+ (N.Y.Fam.Ct. Jul 08, 1981)
(NO. D-6468/80) HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
58 State v. Surber, 1982 WL 3200, *2+ (Ohio App. 12 Dist. Aug 04, 1982) (NO. CA-974) " HN: 7,9
(S.Ct.)
59 State v. Oyen, 480 P.2d 766, 772+, 78 Wash.2d 909, 919+ (Wash. Feb 11, 1971) (NO. 41298) " HN:
9,10 (S.Ct.)
60 City of Wauwatosa v. King, 182 N.W.2d 530, 535+, 49 Wis.2d 398, 408+, 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2403,
2403+, 42 A.L.R.3d 1341, 1341+, 64 Lab.Cas. P 52,474, 52474+ (Wis. Jan 08, 1971) (NO. 218) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
61 State Farm Show Arena, 1976 WL 414, *2+, 1 Pa. D. & C.3d 168, 172+ (Pa.Atty.Gen. Dec 30, 1976)
" HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
Cited
62 International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee, 112 S.Ct. 2711, 2712+, 505 U.S. 672,
688+, 120 L.Ed.2d 541, 541+, 60 USLW 4749, 4749+ (U.S.N.Y. Jun 26, 1992) (NO. 91-155, 91339) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
63 U.S. v. Kokinda, 110 S.Ct. 3115, 3125, 497 U.S. 720, 738, 111 L.Ed.2d 571, 571, 58 USLW 5013,
5013 (U.S.Md. Jun 27, 1990) (NO. 88-2031)
64 City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Pub. Co., 108 S.Ct. 2138, 2157, 486 U.S. 750, 781, 100 L.Ed.2d
771, 771, 56 USLW 4611, 4611, 15 Media L. Rep. 1481, 1481 (U.S.Ohio Jun 17, 1988) (NO. 861042) " (in dissent) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
65 Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., 105 S.Ct. 3439, 3450+, 473 U.S.
788, 804+, 87 L.Ed.2d 567, 567+, 53 USLW 5116, 5116+ (U.S.Dist.Col. Jul 02, 1985) (NO. 84-312)
" HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
66 McDonald v. Smith, 105 S.Ct. 2787, 2793+, 472 U.S. 479, 488+, 86 L.Ed.2d 384, 384+, 53 USLW
4789, 4789+, 17 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1041, 1041+ (U.S.N.C. Jun 19, 1985) (NO. 84-476) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
67 Members of City Council of City of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 104 S.Ct. 2118, 2134,
466 U.S. 789, 815, 80 L.Ed.2d 772, 772 (U.S.Cal. May 15, 1984) (NO. 82-975) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
68 Minnesota State Bd. for Community Colleges v. Knight, 104 S.Ct. 1058, 1064, 465 U.S. 271, 282,
79 L.Ed.2d 299, 299, 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2785, 2785, 15 Ed. Law Rep. 1050, 1050 (U.S.Minn.
Feb 21, 1984) (NO. 82-898, 82-977)
69 U.S. v. Grace, 103 S.Ct. 1702, 1707+, 461 U.S. 171, 178+, 75 L.Ed.2d 736, 736+ (U.S.Dist.Col. Apr
20, 1983) (NO. 81-1863) HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
70 Perry Educ. Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n, 103 S.Ct. 948, 955+, 460 U.S. 37, 46+, 74
L.Ed.2d 794, 794+, 112 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2766, 2766+, 9 Ed. Law Rep. 23, 23+ (U.S.Ind. Feb 23,
1983) (NO. 81-896) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
71 Dallas County Hospital District v. Dallas Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now,
103 S.Ct. 471, 471+, 459 U.S. 1052, 1052+, 74 L.Ed.2d 619, 619+ (U.S.Tex. Nov 29, 1982) (NO.
82-446) (in dissent) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
72 Board of Educ., Island Trees Union Free School Dist. No. 26 v. Pico, 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2829, 457 U.S.
853, 909, 73 L.Ed.2d 435, 435, 4 Ed. Law Rep. 1013, 1013, 8 Media L. Rep. 1721, 1721 (U.S.N.Y.
Jun 25, 1982) (NO. 80-2043) " (in dissent) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
73 Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San Diego, 101 S.Ct. 2882, 2897+, 453 U.S. 490, 517+, 69 L.Ed.2d 800,
800+, 16 ERC 1057, 1057+, 11 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,600, 20600+ (U.S.Cal. Jul 02, 1981) (NO. 80-195)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
74 Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 100 S.Ct. 2814, 2827+, 448 U.S. 555, 577+, 65 L.Ed.2d
973, 973+, 6 Media L. Rep. 1833, 1833+ (U.S.Va. Jul 02, 1980) (NO. 79-243)
75 Carey v. Brown, 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2295, 447 U.S. 455, 470, 65 L.Ed.2d 263, 263 (U.S.Ill. Jun 20,
1980) (NO. 79-703) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
76 Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of New York, 100 S.Ct.
2326, 2334, 447 U.S. 530, 539, 34 P.U.R.4th 208, 208, 65 L.Ed.2d 319, 319, 6 Media L. Rep. 1518,
1518 (U.S.N.Y. Jun 20, 1980) (NO. 79-134) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
77 Bell v. Wolfish, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 1881+, 441 U.S. 520, 552+, 60 L.Ed.2d 447, 447+ (U.S.N.Y. May 14,
1979) (NO. 77-1829)
78 City of Madison, Joint School Dist. No. 8 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission, 97 S.Ct.
421, 428, 429 U.S. 167, 178, 50 L.Ed.2d 376, 376, 93 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2970, 2970, 79 Lab.Cas. P
53,869, 53869 (U.S.Wis. Dec 08, 1976) (NO. 75-946) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
79 Hudgens v. N. L. R. B., 96 S.Ct. 1029, 1036, 424 U.S. 507, 520, 47 L.Ed.2d 196, 196, 91 L.R.R.M.
(BNA) 2489, 2489, 78 Lab.Cas. P 11,278, 11278 (U.S.Ga. Mar 03, 1976) (NO. 74-773) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
80 Buckley v. Valeo, 96 S.Ct. 612, 634+, 424 U.S. 1, 18+, 46 L.Ed.2d 659, 659+, 76-1 USTC P 9189,
9189+ (U.S.Dist.Col. Jan 30, 1976) (NO. 75 436, 75 437) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
81 Bigelow v. Virginia, 95 S.Ct. 2222, 2235, 421 U.S. 809, 826, 44 L.Ed.2d 600, 600, 1 Media L. Rep.
1919, 1919 (U.S.Va. Jun 16, 1975) (NO. 73-1309)
82 Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad, 95 S.Ct. 1239, 1245+, 420 U.S. 546, 555+, 43 L.Ed.2d
448, 448+, 1 Media L. Rep. 1140, 1140+ (U.S.Tenn. Mar 18, 1975) (NO. 73-1004) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
83 Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights, 94 S.Ct. 2714, 2717+, 418 U.S. 298, 303+, 41 L.Ed.2d 770, 770+
(U.S.Ohio Jun 25, 1974) (NO. 73-328) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
84 Healy v. James, 92 S.Ct. 2338, 2352, 408 U.S. 169, 193, 33 L.Ed.2d 266, 266 (U.S.Conn. Jun 26,
1972) (NO. 71-452)
85 Lloyd Corp., Limited v. Tanner, 92 S.Ct. 2219, 2228+, 407 U.S. 551, 568+, 33 L.Ed.2d 131, 131+
(U.S.Or. Jun 22, 1972) (NO. 71-492) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
86 Flower v. U. S., 92 S.Ct. 1842, 1844, 407 U.S. 197, 200, 32 L.Ed.2d 653, 653 (U.S.Tex. Jun 12,
1972) (NO. 71-1180) (in dissent)
87 Eisenstadt v. Baird, 92 S.Ct. 1029, 1041, 405 U.S. 438, 459, 31 L.Ed.2d 349, 349 (U.S.Mass. Mar
22, 1972) (NO. 70-17) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
88 Smith v. Florida, 1971 WL 133181, *133181+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 30, 1971) Brief of the
Respondent (NO. 70-5055)
89 Smith v. Florida, 1971 WL 133289, *133289+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 30, 1971) Brief of the
90 Harris v. U.S., 92 S.Ct. 10, 12, 404 U.S. 1232, 1233, 30 L.Ed.2d 25, 25 (U.S.Cal. Aug 31, 1971)
(NO. A-145) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
91 Cohen v. California, 91 S.Ct. 1780, 1785, 403 U.S. 15, 19, 29 L.Ed.2d 284, 284 (U.S.Cal. Jun 07,
1971) (NO. 299)
92 Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist., 89 S.Ct. 733, 736+, 393 U.S. 503,
506+, 21 L.Ed.2d 731, 731+ (U.S.Iowa Feb 24, 1969) (NO. 21) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
93 Curtis Pub. Co. v. Butts, 87 S.Ct. 1975, 1988, 388 U.S. 130, 148, 18 L.Ed.2d 1094, 1094, 1 Media L.
Rep. 1568, 1568 (U.S.Ga. Jun 12, 1967) (NO. 37, 150)
94 Del Gallo v. Parent, 557 F.3d 58, 68 (1st Cir.(Mass.) Feb 25, 2009) (NO. 08-1511) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
95 U.S. v. Bader, 698 F.2d 553, 555+ (1st Cir.(Mass.) Jan 24, 1983) (NO. 82-1346) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
96 John Donnelly & Sons v. Campbell, 639 F.2d 6, 18, 11 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,091, 20091, 7 Media L.
Rep. 1132, 1132 (1st Cir.(Me.) Dec 22, 1980) (NO. 79-1575)
97 Robson v. U.S., 526 F.2d 1145, 1149 (1st Cir.(N.H.) Dec 17, 1975) (NO. 75-1259)
98 U.S. v. Spock, 416 F.2d 165, 168 (1st Cir.(Mass.) Jul 11, 1969) (NO. 7205-7208) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
99 Huminski v. Corsones, 396 F.3d 53, 90 (2nd Cir.(Vt.) Jan 18, 2005) (NO. 02-6201L, 03-6059CON,
02-6160XAP, 02-6199XAP) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
100 Huminski v. Corsones, 386 F.3d 116, 153 (2nd Cir.(Vt.) Oct 07, 2004) (NO. 02-6201(L), 036059(CON), 02-6150(XAP), 02-6199(CON)) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
101 Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 100 of New York, N.Y. & Vicinity, AFL
CIO v. City of New York Department of Parks & Recreation, 311 F.3d 534, 546, 171 L.R.R.M.
(BNA) 2321, 2321, 147 Lab.Cas. P 59,677, 59677 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Nov 18, 2002) (NO. 01-7602)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
102 New York City Unemployed and Welfare Council v. Brezenoff, 742 F.2d 718, 720 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.)
Aug 20, 1984) (NO. 84-7031, 1484) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
103 New York City Unemployed and Welfare Council v. Brezenoff, 677 F.2d 232, 244 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.)
Apr 20, 1982) (NO. 346, 81-7255)
104 Concerned Jewish Youth v. McGuire, 621 F.2d 471, 474+, 6 Media L. Rep. 1085, 1085+ (2nd Cir.
(N.Y.) Mar 27, 1980) (NO. 228, 79-7456)
105 Wright v. Chief of Transit Police, 558 F.2d 67, 72, 2 Media L. Rep. 1980, 1980 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Jun
08, 1977) (NO. 446, 76-7405) (in dissent) HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
106 Rhoads v. McFerran, 517 F.2d 66, 68 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) May 30, 1975) (NO. 801, 802, 74-2605, 757088)
107 Albany Welfare Rights Organization v. Wyman, 493 F.2d 1319, 1324 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Mar 14, 1974)
(NO. 210, 73-1580)
108 U.S. v. Farinas, 448 F.2d 1334, 1338 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Sep 28, 1971) (NO. 1027, 71-1257)
109 Wolin v. Port of New York Authority, 392 F.2d 83, 90+ (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Mar 01, 1968) (NO. 251,
31715) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
110 Foraker v. Chaffinch, 501 F.3d 231, 235, 155 Lab.Cas. P 60,496, 60496, 26 IER Cases 863, 863 (3rd
Cir.(Del.) Aug 30, 2007) (NO. 06-4086)
111 Asociacion de Trabajadores Agricolas de Puerto Rico v. Green Giant Co., 518 F.2d 130, 136, 89
L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2528, 2528, 77 Lab.Cas. P 10,997, 10997 (3rd Cir.(Del.) May 30, 1975) (NO. 741957) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
112 Spock v. David, 469 F.2d 1047, 1054 (3rd Cir.(N.J.) Oct 27, 1972) (NO. 72-1934)
113 Veterans and Reservists for Peace in Vietnam v. Regional Commissioner of Customs, Region II, 459
F.2d 676, 681+ (3rd Cir.(Pa.) May 04, 1972) (NO. 71-1391) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
114 Dixon v. Coburg Dairy, Inc., 330 F.3d 250, 262+, 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,514, 41514+, 148
Lab.Cas. P 59,750, 59750+, 19 IER Cases 1813, 1813+ (4th Cir.(S.C.) May 30, 2003) (NO. 02-1266)
" HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
115 Warren v. Fairfax County, 169 F.3d 190, 197+ (4th Cir.(Va.) Feb 19, 1999) (NO. 98-1059) " (in
dissent)
116 Belcher v. City of Poquoson, 934 F.2d 318, 318 (4th Cir.(Va.) May 29, 1991) (Table, text in
WESTLAW, NO. 90-2618) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
117 Shopco Distribution Co., Inc. v. Commanding General of Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North
Carolina, 885 F.2d 167, 171+ (4th Cir.(N.C.) Sep 13, 1989) (NO. 88-2974) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
118 U.S. v. Kokinda, 866 F.2d 699, 702+, 57 USLW 2461, 2461+ (4th Cir.(Md.) Jan 31, 1989) (NO. 87-
5107) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)

119 Thorne v. Bailey, 846 F.2d 241, 244 (4th Cir.(W.Va.) May 05, 1988) (NO. 86-7697) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
120 Wright v. Bailey, 544 F.2d 737, 740 (4th Cir.(Va.) Nov 04, 1976) (NO. 74-2105) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
121 U.S. v. Cassiagnol, 420 F.2d 868, 874 (4th Cir.(Va.) Jan 08, 1970) (NO. 12063, 12064, 12065,
12086, 12252, 12659, 12660)
122 Sonnier v. Crain, 2010 WL 2907484, *10 (5th Cir.(La.) Jul 27, 2010) (NO. 09-30186) " HN: 10
(S.Ct.)
123 de la O v. Housing Authority of City of El Paso, Tex., 417 F.3d 495, 503 (5th Cir.(Tex.) Jul 18, 2005)
(NO. 04-50363)
124 Campbell v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd., 231 F.3d 937, 947, 148 Ed. Law Rep. 715, 715 (5th
Cir.(La.) Oct 26, 2000) (NO. 99-31071, 99-31140) (in dissent)
125 Fernandes v. Limmer, 663 F.2d 619, 627 (5th Cir.(Tex.) Dec 11, 1981) (NO. 79-3581) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
126 Dallas Ass'n of Community Organizations for Reform Now v. Dallas County Hospital Dist., 656 F.2d
1175, 1179+ (5th Cir.(Tex.) Sep 25, 1981) (NO. 79-3967) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
127 U.S. v. Flower, 452 F.2d 80, 82+ (5th Cir.(Tex.) Nov 08, 1971) (NO. 31143) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
128 Hiett v. U.S., 415 F.2d 664, 672 (5th Cir.(Tex.) Aug 26, 1969) (NO. 25732) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
129 U.S. v. Smith, 414 F.2d 630, 636, 24 A.F.T.R.2d 69-5599, 69-5599 (5th Cir.(Tex.) May 14, 1969)
(NO. 26398) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
130 Davis v. Francois, 395 F.2d 730, 736 (5th Cir.(La.) May 28, 1968) (NO. 25562) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
131 Gaughan v. City of Cleveland, 212 Fed.Appx. 405, 416, 2007 Fed.App. 0002N, 0002N (6th Cir.
(Ohio) Jan 03, 2007) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 06-3010) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
132 Glasson v. City of Louisville, 518 F.2d 899, 904 (6th Cir.(Ky.) Jun 13, 1975) (NO. 73-1509)
133 Norton v. Discipline Committee of East Tennessee State University, 419 F.2d 195, 205 (6th Cir.
(Tenn.) Nov 28, 1969) (NO. 19107) (in dissent)
134 Gilles v. Blanchard, 477 F.3d 466, 470, 216 Ed. Law Rep. 328, 328 (7th Cir.(Ind.) Feb 14, 2007)
(NO. 06-1441) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
135 Jacobsen v. Illinois Dept. of Transp., 419 F.3d 642, 647, 33 Media L. Rep. 2345, 2345 (7th Cir.(Ill.)
Aug 17, 2005) (NO. 04-1115) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
136 Schultz v. Frisby, 807 F.2d 1339, 1345+, 55 USLW 2346, 2346+ (7th Cir.(Wis.) Dec 08, 1986) (NO.
85-2950) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
137 National Anti-Drug Coalition, Inc. v. Bolger, 737 F.2d 717, 720+ (7th Cir.(Ill.) Jun 26, 1984) (NO.
83-1688) HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
138 U.S. v. Baranski, 484 F.2d 556, 569 (7th Cir.(Ill.) Aug 29, 1973) (NO. 72-1345) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
139 Lee v. Board of Regents of State Colleges, 441 F.2d 1257, 1259+, 1 Media L. Rep. 1947, 1947+ (7th
Cir.(Wis.) May 04, 1971) (NO. 18404, 18405) " HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
140 U.S. v. Woodard, 376 F.2d 136, 142 (7th Cir.(Ill.) Apr 04, 1967) (NO. 15566, 15567) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
141 Frye v. Kansas City Missouri Police Dept., 375 F.3d 785, 790 (8th Cir.(Mo.) Jul 26, 2004) (NO. 032134) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
142 Jamison v. City of St. Louis, 828 F.2d 1280, 1283, 44 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1362, 1362 (8th
Cir.(Mo.) Sep 10, 1987) (NO. 86-2007, 86-2249) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
143 McIntosh v. Arkansas Republican Party-Frank White Election Committee, 766 F.2d 337, 341 (8th
Cir.(Ark.) Jun 25, 1985) (NO. 84-1499) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
144 Chambers v. Wyrick, 539 F.2d 667, 668 (8th Cir.(Mo.) Aug 10, 1976) (NO. 76-1654) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
145 Menotti v. City of Seattle, 409 F.3d 1113, 1155, 05 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4630, 4630, 2005 Daily
Journal D.A.R. 6366, 6366 (9th Cir.(Wash.) Jun 02, 2005) (NO. 02-35971, 02-36027) HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
146 Hangarter v. Provident Life and Acc. Ins. Co., 373 F.3d 998, 1012, 04 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5615,
5615, 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7655, 7655 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Jun 25, 2004) (NO. 02-17423) HN: 8
(S.Ct.)
147 Galvin v. Hay, 374 F.3d 739, 752, 04 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4913, 4913, 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R.
6768, 6768 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Jun 08, 2004) (NO. 00-17425) " HN: 7 (S.Ct.)
148 Galvin v. Hay, 361 F.3d 1134, 1146, 04 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2338, 2338, 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R.
3465, 3465 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Mar 18, 2004) (NO. 00-17425) " HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
149 Kindt v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd., 67 F.3d 266, 269, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7981, 7981, 95
Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,670, 13670 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Oct 10, 1995) (NO. 94-55479)
150 U.S. v. Vosburgh, 59 F.3d 177, 177+ (9th Cir.(Or.) Jun 12, 1995) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 9435635) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
151 U.S. v. Ramos, 28 F.3d 978, 980 (9th Cir.(Ariz.) Jun 29, 1994) (NO. 93-10248) HN: 8 (S.Ct.)
152 U.S. v. Ramos, 39 F.3d 219, 220 (9th Cir.(Ariz.) Jun 29, 1994) (NO. 93-10248) HN: 8 (S.Ct.)
153 U.S. v. Alsept, 5 F.3d 540, 540 (9th Cir.(Wash.) Sep 13, 1993) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 9230476) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
154 U.S. v. Portnoy, 894 F.2d 410, 410 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Jan 19, 1990) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 885454) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
155 Lear Siegler, Inc., Energy Products Div. v. Lehman, 842 F.2d 1102, 1126, 56 USLW 2583, 2583, 34
Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) P 75,461, 75461 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Mar 23, 1988) (NO. 86-6496, 87-5698, 875670)
156 Monterey County Democratic Cent. Committee v. U.S. Postal Service, 812 F.2d 1194, 1196+ (9th
Cir.(Cal.) Mar 17, 1987) (NO. 85-1685) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
157 Hale v. Department of Energy, 806 F.2d 910, 915+, 7 Fed.R.Serv.3d 38, 38+ (9th Cir.(Nev.) Dec 18,
1986) (NO. 86-1912) HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
158 Acorn v. City of Phoenix, 798 F.2d 1260, 1265, 55 USLW 2154, 2154 (9th Cir.(Ariz.) Sep 02, 1986)
(NO. 85-1810) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
159 Trenouth v. U.S., 764 F.2d 1305, 1308, 119 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3615, 3615 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Jul 02, 1985)
(NO. 84-5982) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
160 Cinevision Corp. v. City of Burbank, 745 F.2d 560, 569, 53 USLW 2234, 2234 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Oct
18, 1984) (NO. 83-5606, 83-5730, 83-5949, 83-6154)
161 U.S. v. Christopher, 700 F.2d 1253, 1259+ (9th Cir.(Cal.) Mar 08, 1983) (NO. 82-1149, 82-1150, 821151, 82-1156, 82-1203) HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
162 U.S. v. Douglass, 579 F.2d 545, 549 (9th Cir.(Wash.) Aug 04, 1978) (NO. 78-1034)
163 U.S. v. Mowat, 582 F.2d 1194, 1205+ (9th Cir.(Hawai'i) Jul 18, 1978) (NO. 77-2944, 77-3096, 773097, 77-3284)
164 McMorris v. Alioto, 567 F.2d 897, 899, 53 A.L.R. Fed. 881, 881 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Jan 18, 1978) (NO.
75-2375) HN: 7 (S.Ct.)
165 Knight v. Anderson, 480 F.2d 8, 10 (9th Cir.(Cal.) May 24, 1973) (NO. 71-2553)
166 Sellers v. Regents of University of Cal., 432 F.2d 493, 498 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Sep 17, 1970) (NO. 23581)
" HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
167 Callison v. U.S., 413 F.2d 133, 136 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Jun 18, 1969) (NO. 23014)
168 Brown v. Palmer, 944 F.2d 732, 738 (10th Cir.(Colo.) Sep 10, 1991) (NO. 88-2450)
169 Brown v. Palmer, 915 F.2d 1435, 1440 (10th Cir.(Colo.) Oct 03, 1990) (NO. 88-2450) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
170 McGurran v. Veterans Administration, 665 F.2d 321, 322, 108 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3176, 3176 (10th
Cir.(Colo.) Dec 01, 1981) (NO. 80-1534) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)

171 Benson v. Rich, 448 F.2d 1371, 1373 (10th Cir.(N.M.) Oct 18, 1971) (NO. 519-70, 520-70)
172 Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watts, 936 F.2d 1189, 1201+, 19 Media L. Rep. 1097, 1097+ (11th
Cir.(Fla.) Jul 26, 1991) (NO. 90-3601) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
173 U.S. v. Gilbert, 920 F.2d 878, 884 (11th Cir.(Ga.) Jan 10, 1991) (NO. 89-8711) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
174 M.N.C. of Hinesville, Inc. v. U.S. Dept. of Defense, 791 F.2d 1466, 1472 (11th Cir.(Ga.) Jun 23,
1986) (NO. 85-8041) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
175 Preminger v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 517 F.3d 1299, 1314 (Fed.Cir. Feb 25, 2008) (NO. 20077008) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
176 Preminger v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 498 F.3d 1265, 1278 (Fed.Cir. Aug 17, 2007) (NO. 20077008) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
177 Alliance for Community Media v. F.C.C., 56 F.3d 105, 122, 63 USLW 2781, 2781, 78 Rad. Reg. 2d
(P & F) 59, 59, 312 U.S.App.D.C. 141, 158 (D.C.Cir. Jun 06, 1995) (NO. 93-1169, 93-1276, 931171, 93-1270)
178 Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Turner, 893 F.2d 1387, 1390+, 282 U.S.App.D.C. 238,
241+ (D.C.Cir. Jan 26, 1990) (NO. 89-7120) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
179 Ukrainian-American Bar Ass'n, Inc. v. Baker, 893 F.2d 1374, 1381, 58 USLW 2433, 2433, 282
U.S.App.D.C. 225, 232 (D.C.Cir. Jan 26, 1990) (NO. 88-5337, 88-5338)
180 Finzer v. Barry, 798 F.2d 1450, 1462+, 55 USLW 2128, 2128+, 255 U.S.App.D.C. 19, 31+ (D.C.Cir.
Aug 19, 1986) (NO. 84-5327) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
181 Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Watt, 703 F.2d 586, 594+, 227 U.S.App.D.C. 19, 27+
(D.C.Cir. Mar 09, 1983) (NO. 82-2445, 82-2477)
182 Dellums v. Powell, 566 F.2d 167, 202+, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 275, 310+, 24 Fed.R.Serv.2d 20, 20+
(D.C.Cir. Aug 04, 1977) (NO. 75-1974)
183 Carlson v. Schlesinger, 511 F.2d 1327, 1331+, 167 U.S.App.D.C. 325, 329+ (D.C.Cir. Apr 25, 1975)
(NO. 73-2170) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
184 Waters v. Peterson, 495 F.2d 91, 102, 6 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8900, 8900, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 265, 276
(D.C.Cir. Oct 12, 1973) (NO. 72-1320) (in dissent) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
185 Jones v. District of Columbia Armory Bd., 438 F.2d 138, 140+, 141 U.S.App.D.C. 297, 299+
(D.C.Cir. Nov 02, 1970) (NO. 24739) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
186 Washington Free Community, Inc. v. Wilson, 426 F.2d 1213, 1217+, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 219, 223+
(D.C.Cir. Dec 19, 1969) (NO. 23438)
187 Women Strike for Peace v. Hickel, 420 F.2d 597, 604, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 29, 36 (D.C.Cir. Aug 01,
1969) (NO. 23268)
188 Quaker Action Group v. Hickel, 421 F.2d 1111, 1116+, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 176, 181+ (D.C.Cir. Jun
24, 1969) (NO. 22983)
189 Houser v. Hill, 278 F.Supp. 920, 928 (M.D.Ala. Jan 16, 1968) (NO. CIV. 2564-N)
190 Knights of Ku Klux Klan v. Arkansas State Highway and Transp. Dept., 807 F.Supp. 1427, 1434
(W.D.Ark. Nov 02, 1992) (NO. CIV. 92-3045) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
191 Glair v. City of Los Angeles, 2010 WL 1407357, *8 (C.D.Cal. Feb 17, 2010) (NO. CV 09-6450-R
(RNB)) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
192 Franck v. Hubbard, 2009 WL 1037703, *5 (S.D.Cal. Apr 17, 2009) (NO. CIV. 07-0846JNLS) " HN:
10 (S.Ct.)
193 Furumoto v. Lyman, 362 F.Supp. 1267, 1281 (N.D.Cal. Aug 21, 1973) (NO. C-72-1997-CBR) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
194 U.S. v. Fee, 787 F.Supp. 963, 967+ (D.Colo. Feb 28, 1992) (NO. CIV. A. 91-CR-373) HN: 10,11
(S.Ct.)
195 Sixteenth of September Planning Committee, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, Colo., 474 F.Supp.
1333, 1337 (D.Colo. Aug 15, 1979) (NO. CIV. 78-K-798)
196 DeGregory v. Giesing, 427 F.Supp. 910, 915, 95 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2517, 2517, 82 Lab.Cas. P 55,101,
55101 (D.Conn. Mar 01, 1977) (NO. CIV H-75-313) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
197 Thoms v. Smith, 334 F.Supp. 1203, 1214 (D.Conn. Nov 09, 1971) (NO. CIV. 14246) " (in dissent)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
198 Mahoney v. District of Columbia, 662 F.Supp.2d 74, 90 (D.D.C. Sep 30, 2009) (NO. CIV.A. 09-105
(ESH)) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
199 Initiative and Referendum Institute v. U.S. Postal Service, 297 F.Supp.2d 143, 149 (D.D.C. Dec 31,
2003) (NO. CIV.A. 00-1246 (RWR))
200 Initiative and Referendum Institute v. U.S. Postal Service, 116 F.Supp.2d 65, 70 (D.D.C. Aug 31,
2000) (NO. CIV. A. 00-1246(RWR)) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
201 Lederman v. U.S., 89 F.Supp.2d 29, 36 (D.D.C. Mar 14, 2000) (NO. CIV. A. 99-3359 (RWR) "
202 AFSCME Local 2477 v. Billington, 740 F.Supp. 1, 7, 58 USLW 2685, 2685 (D.D.C. May 02, 1990)
(NO. CIV.A. 88-3069-OG)
203 Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Watt, 1982 WL 3915, *9 (D.D.C. Dec 09, 1982) (NO.
CIV.A. 82-2501) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
204 Grace v. Burger, 524 F.Supp. 815, 818 (D.D.C. Aug 07, 1980) (NO. CIV. 80-1205) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
205 Jeannette Rankin Brigade v. Chief of Capitol Police, 342 F.Supp. 575, 583+ (D.D.C. May 09, 1972)
(NO. CIV. A. 54-68)
206 Catron v. City of St. Petersburg, 2009 WL 3837789, *10 (M.D.Fla. Nov 17, 2009) (NO. 809-CV923-T-23EAJ) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
207 Edwards v. Acadia Realty Trust, Inc., 2001 WL 34104845, *8 (M.D.Fla. Jan 10, 2001) (NO.
6:99CV110-ORL-28KRS) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
208 Pritchard v. Carlton, 821 F.Supp. 671, 676 (S.D.Fla. Apr 21, 1993) (NO. 93-0723-CIVHIGHSMITH)
209 Telesat Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Riviera Beach, 773 F.Supp. 383, 393, 70 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F)
435, 435 (S.D.Fla. Sep 13, 1991) (NO. 87-8207-CIV-MARCUS, 87-8208-CIV-MARCUS) HN: 10
(S.Ct.)
210 Naturist Soc., Inc. v. Fillyaw, 736 F.Supp. 1103, 1115+ (S.D.Fla. May 04, 1990) (NO. 89-8130-CIVJAG) " HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
211 Cohen v. Katsaris, 530 F.Supp. 1092, 1095 (N.D.Fla. Jan 07, 1982) (NO. TCA 80-0701) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
212 Jersawitz v. People TV, 71 F.Supp.2d 1330, 1339+ (N.D.Ga. Mar 30, 1999) (NO. CIV.A.
197CV290CAM) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
213 Day v. Chicago Bd. of Educ., 1998 WL 60770, *4 (N.D.Ill. Feb 05, 1998) (NO. 97 C 6296) HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
214 Substitutes United for Better Schools v. Rohter, 496 F.Supp. 1017, 1019 (N.D.Ill. May 13, 1980)
(NO. 80 C 501)
215 Spartacus Youth League v. Board of Trustees of Illinois Indus. University, 502 F.Supp. 789, 798
(N.D.Ill. Apr 02, 1980) (NO. 78 C 1224)
216 Brown v. Scott, 462 F.Supp. 518, 530 (N.D.Ill. Sep 27, 1978) (NO. 78 C 1105)
217 CBS, Inc. v. Lieberman, 439 F.Supp. 862, 868 (N.D.Ill. Sep 02, 1976) (NO. 76 C 2928) HN: 12
(S.Ct.)
218 In re Sarelas, 360 F.Supp. 794, 798 (N.D.Ill. Jun 05, 1973) (NO. 72 D 2)
219 Sutherland v. DeWulf, 323 F.Supp. 740, 743 (S.D.Ill. Feb 23, 1971) (NO. CIV. RI-331) " HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
220 National Mobilization Committee to End War in Viet Nam v. Foran, 297 F.Supp. 1, 4 (N.D.Ill. Nov
01, 1968) (NO. 68 C 1820) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
221 Scoville v. Board of Ed. of Joliet Tp. High School Dist. 204, Will County, State of Ill., 286 F.Supp.
988, 992 (N.D.Ill. Jul 19, 1968) (NO. 68 C 717)
222 Snyder v. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois, 286 F.Supp. 927, 933, 12 Fed.R.Serv.2d 540,
540 (N.D.Ill. Jul 11, 1968) (NO. 66 C 847)
223 Landry v. Daley, 280 F.Supp. 938, 950+ (N.D.Ill. Mar 01, 1968) (NO. 67 C 1863)
224 Range v. Brubaker, 2009 WL 3200165, *12 (N.D.Ind. Sep 29, 2009) (NO. CIV.3:07CV480)
225 National Coalition of Prayer, Inc. v. Carter, 2005 WL 2253601, *7 (S.D.Ind. Sep 02, 2005) (NO. 020536-C B/S)
226 Grossbaum v. Indianapolis-Marion County Bldg. Authority, 909 F.Supp. 1187, 1194 (S.D.Ind. Dec
15, 1995) (NO. IP 94-1801-C) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
227 McCabe v. Macaulay, 551 F.Supp.2d 771, 787 (N.D.Iowa Oct 01, 2007) (NO. 05-CV-73-LRR) HN:
11 (S.Ct.)
228 McCabe v. Macaulay, 515 F.Supp.2d 944, 963 (N.D.Iowa Sep 04, 2007) (NO. 05-CV-73-LRR) HN:
11 (S.Ct.)
229 Lundberg v. West Monona Community School Dist., 731 F.Supp. 331, 337, 59 Ed. Law Rep. 43, 43
(N.D.Iowa May 18, 1989) (NO. C 89-4039) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
230 Lubavitch of Iowa, Inc. v. Walters, 684 F.Supp. 610, 614 (S.D.Iowa Mar 24, 1988) (NO. CIV. 86901-B) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
231 Leonard v. Griffin, 1969 WL 11175, *26+, 72 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2656, 2656+ (W.D.Ky. Sep 25,
1969) (NO. 1381) " HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
232 Acorn v. City of New Orleans, 606 F.Supp. 16, 20 (E.D.La. Jun 04, 1984) (NO. CIV.A. 83-4859)
233 Parow v. Kinnon, 300 F.Supp.2d 256, 267 (D.Mass. Jan 22, 2004) (NO. CIV.A. 02-12223-RGS) HN:
10 (S.Ct.)
234 Courtemanche v. General Services Admin., 172 F.Supp.2d 251, 258 (D.Mass. Sep 26, 2001) (NO.
CIV. A. 00-10879-DPW) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
235 Globe Newspaper Co. v. Beacon Hill Architectural Com'n, 847 F.Supp. 178, 192, 22 Media L. Rep.
1969, 1969 (D.Mass. Feb 28, 1994) (NO. CIV. A. 91-12297-REK) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
236 Dunkel v. Elkins, 325 F.Supp. 1235, 1244 (D.Md. Mar 17, 1971) (NO. CIV. 70-1239-K) " HN: 10
(S.Ct.)
237 Norton v. Ensor, 269 F.Supp. 533, 539 (D.Md. Jun 06, 1967) (NO. CIV. 18390) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
238 Satawa v. Board of County Road Com'rs of Macomb County, 687 F.Supp.2d 682, 698 (E.D.Mich.
Dec 28, 2009) (NO. 09-CV-14190-DT) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
239 Nigosian v. Weiss, 343 F.Supp. 757, 760, 81 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2230, 2230, 69 Lab.Cas. P 52,917,
52917 (E.D.Mich. Sep 03, 1971) (NO. CIV. A. 32430) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
240 McAlpine v. Reese, 309 F.Supp. 136, 139 (E.D.Mich. Feb 10, 1970) (NO. CIV. 34113) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
241 Stacy v. Williams, 306 F.Supp. 963, 970, 5 A.L.R. Fed. 814, 814 (N.D.Miss. Dec 01, 1969) (NO. WC
6725, WC 6837) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
242 McLaurin v. Burnley, 279 F.Supp. 220, 226 (N.D.Miss. Dec 29, 1967) (NO. GC678) HN: 7,10
(S.Ct.)
243 Coppock v. Patterson, 272 F.Supp. 16, 18+ (S.D.Miss. Aug 16, 1967) (NO. CIV. 3794) HN: 10,12
(S.Ct.)
244 State of Mo. ex rel. Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n v. Cuffley, 927 F.Supp. 1248, 1256
(E.D.Mo. Jun 11, 1996) (NO. 4:94CV1264 (MLM)) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
245 Hennessy v. Selective Service Local Bd. No. 21, Havre, Mont., 292 F.Supp. 465, 470 (D.Mont. Sep
11, 1968) (NO. CIV. 757) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
246 Peterson v. Board of Ed. of School Dist. No. 1 of Lincoln, Lancaster County, Nebraska, 370 F.Supp.
1208, 1214+ (D.Neb. Sep 19, 1973) (NO. CV73-L-136) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
247 Arons v. Donovan, 882 F.Supp. 379, 388 (D.N.J. Mar 29, 1995) (NO. CIV. A. 93-4468(JCL))
248 Amato v. Wilentz, 753 F.Supp. 543, 554+, 59 USLW 2392, 2392+, 18 Media L. Rep. 1985, 1985+
(D.N.J. Dec 18, 1990) (NO. CIV A 90-1951) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
249 International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority,
532 F.Supp. 1088, 1098, 10 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 472, 472 (D.N.J. Sep 22, 1981) (NO. CIV. 78-734)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
250 Spock v. David, 349 F.Supp. 179, 182 (D.N.J. Oct 12, 1972) (NO. CIV. A. 1621-72)
251 Krzewinski v. Kugler, 338 F.Supp. 492, 503 (D.N.J. Feb 04, 1972) (NO. CIV. A. 1011-71) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
252 Hodge v. Lynd, 88 F.Supp.2d 1234, 1241 (D.N.M. Mar 14, 2000) (NO. 98-CIV-1450-BB/JHG)
253 McMillan v. City of New York, 2009 WL 261478, *8+ (E.D.N.Y. Feb 04, 2009) (NO. 03 CV 626
(SLT) (LB)) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
254 Genia v. New York State Troopers, 2007 WL 869594, *23+ (E.D.N.Y. Mar 20, 2007) (NO. 03-CV0870JFBAKT) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
255 People for Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Giuliani, 105 F.Supp.2d 294, 312 (S.D.N.Y. Jul 25, 2000)
(NO. 00 CIV. 3972 (VM)) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
256 Israel v. Abate, 949 F.Supp. 1035, 1042+, 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2097, 2097+ (S.D.N.Y. Dec 11,
1996) (NO. 93 CIV. 3321 (JES)) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
257 Pro-Choice Network of Western New York v. Project Rescue Western New York, 799 F.Supp. 1417,
1434 (W.D.N.Y. Feb 14, 1992) (NO. CIV. 90-1004A)
258 Legi-Tech, Inc. v. Keiper, 601 F.Supp. 371, 379+ (N.D.N.Y. Dec 04, 1984) (NO. 84-CV-1256) HN:
10 (S.Ct.)
259 McCreary v. Stone, 575 F.Supp. 1112, 1122 (S.D.N.Y. Dec 08, 1983) (NO. 83 CIV. 987 (CES), 83
CIV. 3266 (CES)) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
260 Concerned Jewish Youth v. McGuire, 469 F.Supp. 1296, 1299 (S.D.N.Y. May 25, 1979) (NO. 78
CIV. 4891 (MP)) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
261 Galella v. Onassis, 353 F.Supp. 196, 223 (S.D.N.Y. Jul 05, 1972) (NO. 70 CIV. 4348)
262 Ahmed v. Rockefeller, 308 F.Supp. 935, 937+ (S.D.N.Y. Jan 07, 1970) (NO. 69CIV. 4862) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
263 U.S. v. Farinas, 308 F.Supp. 459, 464+ (S.D.N.Y. Dec 30, 1969) (NO. 69 CR. 481) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
264 Segall v. Jacobson, 295 F.Supp. 1121, 1122 (S.D.N.Y. Feb 12, 1969) (NO. 69 CIV. 408)
265 Capital Leasing of Ohio, Inc. v. Columbus Mun. Airport Authority, 13 F.Supp.2d 640, 660 (S.D.Ohio
Jul 15, 1998) (NO. C2-98-356) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
266 Schwitzgebel v. City of Strongsville, 898 F.Supp. 1208, 1217+ (N.D.Ohio Aug 28, 1995) (NO.
A:94CV757) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
267 Bishop v. Reagan-Bush '84 Committee, 635 F.Supp. 1020, 1023+ (S.D.Ohio Mar 07, 1986) (NO.
CIV. C-1-84-1296)
268 Low Income People Together, Inc. v. Manning, 615 F.Supp. 501, 512+ (N.D.Ohio Aug 19, 1985)
(NO. CIV. A. C84-2863)
269 Loving v. Boren, 956 F.Supp. 953, 955, 117 Ed. Law Rep. 169, 169 (W.D.Okla. Jan 28, 1997) (NO.
CIV-96-657-A) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
270 U.S. v. Marcavage, 2009 WL 2170094, *6+ (E.D.Pa. Jul 16, 2009) (NO. 08-MJ-0511) " HN: 10,11
(S.Ct.)
271 Egolf v. Witmer, 421 F.Supp.2d 858, 878 (E.D.Pa. Mar 09, 2006) (NO. CIV.A. 04-5695) HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
272 American Library Ass'n, Inc. v. U.S., 201 F.Supp.2d 401, 454+ (E.D.Pa. May 31, 2002) (NO. CIV.A.
01-1303, CIV.A. 01-1322) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
273 U.S. v. Roach, 947 F.Supp. 872, 877 (E.D.Pa. Nov 29, 1996) (NO. CIV. A. 96-CV-5341) HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
274 Youth Opportunities Unlimited, Inc. v. Board of Public Educ. of School Dist. of Pittsburgh, Pa., 769
F.Supp. 1346, 1353, 69 Ed. Law Rep. 741, 741 (W.D.Pa. Jul 12, 1991) (NO. CIV.A. 91-1106) HN:
10 (S.Ct.)
275 ACT-UP v. Walp, 755 F.Supp. 1281, 1286, 59 USLW 2499, 2499 (M.D.Pa. Feb 06, 1991) (NO.
CIV.A. 1:CV-91-0148) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
276 Gutherman v. Northeast Women's Center, Inc., 1989 WL 66423, *3 (E.D.Pa. Jun 16, 1989) (NO.
CIV. A. 87-8150) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
277 McMonagle v. Goode, 1989 WL 46119, *5 (E.D.Pa. Apr 25, 1989) (NO. CIV. A. 87-7355) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
278 Walton v. Goode, 1989 WL 43631, *5 (E.D.Pa. Mar 22, 1989) (NO. CIV. A. 87-7354) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
279 Schuler v. City of Chambersburg, Pa., 641 F.Supp. 657, 660 (M.D.Pa. Aug 15, 1986) (NO. CIV. A.
86-0580)
280 Student Coalition for Peace v. Lower Merion School Dist., 596 F.Supp. 169, 171, 21 Ed. Law Rep.
225, 225 (E.D.Pa. Sep 28, 1984) (NO. CIV. 84-1017) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
281 American Future Systems, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State University, 568 F.Supp. 666, 670, 13 Ed. Law
Rep. 86, 86 (M.D.Pa. Aug 05, 1983) (NO. CIV. 81-0171)
282 American Future Systems, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State University, 553 F.Supp. 1268, 1279, 8 Ed. Law
Rep. 966, 966 (M.D.Pa. Dec 21, 1982) (NO. CIV. 81-0171)
283 Resident Advisory Bd. v. Rizzo, 503 F.Supp. 383, 389+ (E.D.Pa. Apr 01, 1980) (NO. CIV. 71-1575)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
284 Allendale Leasing, Inc. v. Stone, 614 F.Supp. 1440, 1457+ (D.R.I. Aug 05, 1985) (NO. CIV. A. 83518 P)
285 Reilly v. Noel, 384 F.Supp. 741, 747 (D.R.I. Oct 31, 1974) (NO. CIV. 74-91)
286 Clemson University Vietnam Moratorium Committee v. Clemson University, 306 F.Supp. 129, 132
(D.S.C. Nov 11, 1969) (NO. CIV. 69-919)
287 Hammond v. South Carolina State College, 272 F.Supp. 947, 950+ (D.S.C. Aug 31, 1967) (NO. CIV.
67-165)
288 Wilson v. Johnson, 2005 WL 2417057, *6 (E.D.Tenn. Sep 30, 2005) (NO. 3:04-CV-59) HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
289 Baxter v. Ellington, 318 F.Supp. 1079, 1084 (E.D.Tenn. Aug 13, 1970) (NO. CIV. 6923) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
290 Original Fayette County Civic & Welfare League, Inc. v. Ellington, 309 F.Supp. 89, 95+ (W.D.Tenn.
Feb 09, 1970) (NO. CIV. C-69-266) " HN: 7 (S.Ct.)
291 Service Employees Intern. Union v. City of Houston, 542 F.Supp.2d 617, 634, 185 L.R.R.M. (BNA)
2161 (S.D.Tex. Mar 31, 2008) (NO. CIV.A. H-06-3309) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
292 Chadwell v. Nueces County, Texas, 2006 WL 3053487, *5 (S.D.Tex. Oct 26, 2006) (NO. CIV.A. C-
06-199) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)

293 Nash v. State of Tex., 632 F.Supp. 951, 981, 54 USLW 2461, 2461, 121 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3140,
3140, 106 Lab.Cas. P 55,748, 55748 (E.D.Tex. Feb 21, 1986) (NO. CIV. A. TY-79-73-CA, CIV. A.
TY-79-98-CA)
294 Dallas Ass'n of Community Organizations for Reform Now v. Dallas County Hospital Dist., 478
F.Supp. 1250, 1255+ (N.D.Tex. Nov 08, 1979) (NO. CIV. 3-79-0055-H) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
295 International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness School for Advancement of Vedic Arts and Sciences
for Youth in America-Gurukula (Ksavasya-Gurukula) v. Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport Bd., 391
F.Supp. 606, 611 (N.D.Tex. Mar 21, 1975) (NO. CIV. 3-75-0039-F)
296 Printing Industries of Gulf Coast v. Hill, 382 F.Supp. 801, 816 (S.D.Tex. Aug 20, 1974) (NO. CIV.
73-H-1261) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
297 Duke v. North Texas State University, 338 F.Supp. 990, 997 (E.D.Tex. Sep 01, 1971) (NO. CIV. A.
1977) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
298 Dunn v. Tyler Independent School Dist., 327 F.Supp. 528, 534 (E.D.Tex. May 27, 1971) (NO. CIV.
5285) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
299 Pritchard v. Spring Branch Independent School Dist., 308 F.Supp. 570, 574 (S.D.Tex. Jan 22, 1970)
(NO. CIV. 69-H-1235) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
300 Mood For A Day, Inc. v. Salt Lake County, 953 F.Supp. 1252, 1261 (D.Utah Nov 27, 1995) (NO.
CIV. 92-C-765B) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
301 Myers v. Loudoun County School Bd., 500 F.Supp.2d 539, 547, 223 Ed. Law Rep. 786, 786 (E.D.Va.
Jul 23, 2007) (NO. CIV 07-CV-200)
302 U.S. v. Twinn, 369 F.Supp.2d 721, 724 (E.D.Va. May 09, 2005) (NO. CRIM.A. 04-482)
303 Drake v. Higgins, 1999 WL 462987, *3+ (W.D.Va. Jun 10, 1999) (NO. CIV. A. 97-0143-C) HN:
9,10 (S.Ct.)
304 Drake v. Higgins, 1998 WL 372641, *2+ (W.D.Va. Jun 29, 1998) (NO. CIV. A. 97-0143-C) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
305 Warren v. Fairfax County, 988 F.Supp. 957, 962 (E.D.Va. Dec 17, 1997) (NO. CIV.A. 97-119-A) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
306 Sword v. Fox, 317 F.Supp. 1055, 1066 (W.D.Va. Oct 05, 1970) (NO. CIV.70-C-26-H)
307 Koehl v. Resor, 296 F.Supp. 558, 562 (E.D.Va. Mar 13, 1969) (NO. CIV. 4713-A)
308 Carr v. Reed, 2007 WL 3274914, *10 (W.D.Wash. Nov 05, 2007) (NO. C07-5260RJB) HN: 8
(S.Ct.)
309 Milwaukee Mobilization for Survival v. Milwaukee County Park Commission, 477 F.Supp. 1210,
1219 (E.D.Wis. Oct 03, 1979) (NO. 78-C-495) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
310 International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Wolke, 453 F.Supp. 869, 873, 4 Media L. Rep.
1251, 1251 (E.D.Wis. Jul 19, 1978) (NO. CIV. 76-C-293) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
311 Lawrence University Bicentennial Commission v. City of Appleton, Wisconsin, 409 F.Supp. 1319,
1324 (E.D.Wis. Apr 02, 1976) (NO. 76-C-183) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
312 Groppi v. Froehlich, 311 F.Supp. 765, 770 (W.D.Wis. Apr 08, 1970) (NO. 69-C-235) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
313 U.S. v. Sroka, 307 F.Supp. 400, 402+ (E.D.Wis. Dec 18, 1969) (NO. 69-CR-85) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
314 U.S. v. Miller, 1 M.J. 367, 369 (CMA Mar 26, 1976) (NO. 30,158) (in dissent) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
315 Thomas v. City of Eufaula, 218 So.2d 813, 816+, 44 Ala.App. 643, 647+ (Ala.App. Nov 05, 1968)
(NO. 4 DIV 583) "
316 Powers v. City of Huntsville, 440 So.2d 1185, 1188+, 117 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2522, 2522+
(Ala.Crim.App. Aug 02, 1983) (NO. 8 DIV. 734) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
317 Cottonreeder v. State, 392 So.2d 869, 871+ (Ala.Crim.App. Oct 07, 1980) (NO. 8 DIV. 351) " HN:
7,8 (S.Ct.)
318 Hill v. State, 381 So.2d 206, 211+ (Ala.Crim.App. Dec 04, 1979) (NO. 3 DIV.115) " HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
319 Alaska Gay Coalition v. Sullivan, 578 P.2d 951, 957, 3 Media L. Rep. 2297, 2297 (Alaska May 05,
1978) (NO. 3083)
320 State v. Barr, 904 P.2d 1258, 1262, 183 Ariz. 434, 438 (Ariz.App. Div. 1 May 16, 1995) (NO. 1 CACR 93-0275) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
321 Intel Corp. v. Hamidi, 1 Cal.Rptr.3d 32, 74, 71 P.3d 296, 331, 30 Cal.4th 1342, 1395, 148 Lab.Cas. P
59,756, 59756, 20 IER Cases 65, 65, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5711, 5711, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R.
7181, 7181 (Cal. Jun 30, 2003) (NO. S103781) (in dissent) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
322 Aguilar v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc., 87 Cal.Rptr.2d 132, 157, 980 P.2d 846, 868, 21 Cal.4th 121,
155, 80 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 643, 643, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,960, 45960, 15 IER Cases
594, 594, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6144, 6144, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7877, 7877 (Cal. Aug 02,
1999) (NO. S054561) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
323 In re Berry, 65 Cal.Rptr. 273, 284, 436 P.2d 273, 284, 68 Cal.2d 137, 154 (Cal. Jan 24, 1968) (NO.
CR. 11117)
324 Wirta v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit Dist., 64 Cal.Rptr. 430, 433, 434 P.2d 982, 985, 68 Cal.2d 51,
54 (Cal. Dec 21, 1967) (NO. SF 22418)
325 Head v. Board of Trustees of California State University, 2007 WL 118882, *10+ (Cal.App. 6 Dist.
Jan 18, 2007) (NO. H029129) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
326 McMahon v. Riffer, 2002 WL 1067808, *4+ (Cal.App. 1 Dist. May 29, 2002) (NO. A094883) HN:
11 (S.Ct.)
327 Planned Parenthood Assn. v. Operation Rescue, 57 Cal.Rptr.2d 736, 741, 50 Cal.App.4th 290, 300,
50 Cal.App.4th 1632E, 1632E, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7900, 7900, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,057,
13057 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Oct 28, 1996) (NO. A070725) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
328 Zhao v. Wong, 55 Cal.Rptr.2d 909, 916, 48 Cal.App.4th 1114, 1126, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6239,
6239, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,149, 10149 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Aug 20, 1996) (NO. A068903)
329 In re Timothy R., 248 Cal.Rptr. 721, 724, 202 Cal.App.3d 593, 598 (Cal.App. 6 Dist. Jun 27, 1988)
(NO. H003177) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
330 Prisoners Union v. Department of Corrections, 185 Cal.Rptr. 634, 636+, 135 Cal.App.3d 930, 934+
(Cal.App. 1 Dist. Sep 17, 1982) (NO. CIV. 54007) HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
331 Laguna Publishing Co. v. Golden Rain Foundation, 182 Cal.Rptr. 813, 828, 131 Cal.App.3d 816,
841, 1982-83 Trade Cases P 65,125, 65125 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. May 18, 1982) (NO. CIV. 20650) HN:
12 (S.Ct.)
332 Laguna Pub. Co. v. Golden West Pub. Corp., 177 Cal.Rptr. 703, 716, 124 Cal.App.3d 967, 967,
1982-1 Trade Cases P 64,650, 64650 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Oct 26, 1981) (NO. CIV. 20650) HN: 12
(S.Ct.)
333 People v. Hirst, 106 Cal.Rptr. 815, 820, 31 Cal.App.3d 75, 84 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Mar 09, 1973) (NO.
CR. 5323) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
334 In re Ball, 100 Cal.Rptr. 189, 193+, 23 Cal.App.3d 380, 386+ (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Feb 08, 1972) (NO.
CR. 4959)
335 People v. Arvanites, 95 Cal.Rptr. 493, 497, 17 Cal.App.3d 1052, 1059 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Jun 01,
1971) (NO. CR 18816)
336 Simpson v. Municipal Court, 92 Cal.Rptr. 417, 419, 14 Cal.App.3d 591, 595 (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Jan
21, 1971) (NO. CIV. 12616)
337 Castro v. Superior Court, 88 Cal.Rptr. 500, 506+, 9 Cal.App.3d 675, 683+ (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Jul 17,
1970) (NO. CIV. 34178) "
338 Diamond v. Bland, 87 Cal.Rptr. 97, 102+, 8 Cal.App.3d 58, 58+ (Cal.App. 4 Dist. May 25, 1970)
(NO. CIV.10084) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
339 Mandel v. Municipal Court for Oakland-Piedmont Judicial Dist., Alameda County, 81 Cal.Rptr. 173,
181+, 276 Cal.App.2d 649, 661+ (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Oct 08, 1969) (NO. CIV. 26042) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
340 Eisen v. Regents of University of California, 75 Cal.Rptr. 45, 52, 269 Cal.App.2d 696, 706, 37
A.L.R.3d 1300, 1300 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Feb 17, 1969) (NO. CIV. 24987)
341 Di Lorenzo v. City of Pacific Grove, 67 Cal.Rptr. 3, 7, 260 Cal.App.2d 68, 73 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Mar
14, 1968) (NO. CIV. 24122) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
342 People v. Agnello, 66 Cal.Rptr. 571, 575, 259 Cal.App.2d 785, 792 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Mar 04, 1968)
(NO. CR. 14417)
343 Parrish v. Municipal Court, Modesto Judicial Dist., Stanislaus County, 65 Cal.Rptr. 862, 866, 258
Cal.App.2d 497, 504 (Cal.App. 5 Dist. Jan 31, 1968) (NO. CIV. 793) "
344 People v. Davis, 63 Cal.Rptr. 589, 592+ (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Nov 09, 1967) (NO. CR. 13919)
345 Wirta v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit Dist., 61 Cal.Rptr. 419, 422 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Aug 11, 1967)
(NO. CIV. 23859) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
346 Goldberg v. Regents of University of Cal., 57 Cal.Rptr. 463, 471+, 248 Cal.App.2d 867, 878+
(Cal.App. 1 Dist. Feb 28, 1967) (NO. CIV. 23556) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
347 People v. Horton, 87 Cal.Rptr. 818, 822+, 9 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1, 8+ (Cal.App.Super. May 21, 1970)
(NO. CR. 8632, CR. 8633, CR. 8634, CR. 8635) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
348 People v. Uptgraft, 87 Cal.Rptr. 459, 461, 8 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1, 5 (Cal.App.Super. Feb 13, 1970)
(NO. CR. 8603-8611) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
349 State v. Anonymous (1971-2), 274 A.2d 897, 899, 6 Conn.Cir.Ct. 372, 375 (Conn.Cir.A.D. 1971)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
350 Farina v. U.S., 622 A.2d 50, 55 (D.C. Mar 19, 1993) (NO. 88-CM-1450, 88-CM-1476, 88-CM-1477,
88-CM-1478, 88-CM-1544, 88-CM-1545) "
351 Federov v. U.S., 580 A.2d 600, 604 (D.C. Sep 06, 1990) (NO. 88-240, 88-242, 88-531)
352 Hemmati v. U.S., 564 A.2d 739, 742 (D.C. Sep 26, 1989) (NO. 87-909) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
353 Arlt v. U.S., 562 A.2d 633, 636 (D.C. Jul 25, 1989) (NO. 87-60)
354 Smith v. U. S., 445 A.2d 961, 966 (D.C. May 03, 1982) (NO. 13790, 13791) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
355 District of Columbia v. Gueory, 376 A.2d 834, 838+ (D.C. Jul 25, 1977) (NO. 11134)
356 Leiss v. U. S., 364 A.2d 803, 808+ (D.C. Sep 20, 1976) (NO. 9734) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
357 Riley v. District of Columbia, 283 A.2d 819, 824 (D.C. Nov 24, 1971) (NO. 5601, 5602)
358 Sadowski v. Shevin, 345 So.2d 330, 333, 2 Media L. Rep. 1822, 1822 (Fla. Mar 10, 1977) (NO.
49769) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
359 Corn v. State, 332 So.2d 4, 6 (Fla. Mar 19, 1976) (NO. 46922) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
360 Lieberman v. Marshall, 236 So.2d 120, 127+ (Fla. May 28, 1970) (NO. 38787) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
361 Brooks v. State, 336 So.2d 647, 650 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. Aug 10, 1976) (NO. BB-372) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
362 Carlson v. City of Tallahassee, 240 So.2d 866, 867+ (Fla.App. 1 Dist. Nov 12, 1970) (NO. N-156)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
363 Napoleon v. Glass, 229 So.2d 883, 885 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. Dec 09, 1969) (NO. 69-425)
364 Stone Mountain Memorial Ass'n v. Zauber, 424 S.E.2d 279, 282, 262 Ga. 661, 664 (Ga. Jan 08,
1993) (NO. S92A1170) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
365 State v. Boone, 254 S.E.2d 367, 369+, 243 Ga. 416, 420+ (Ga. Apr 04, 1979) (NO. 34633) " HN: 10
(S.Ct.)
366 Alonso v. State, 202 S.E.2d 37, 39, 231 Ga. 444, 445 (Ga. Nov 08, 1973) (NO. 28147-28154) HN: 7
(S.Ct.)
367 Hope v. State, 387 S.E.2d 414, 416, 193 Ga.App. 202, 204 (Ga.App. Oct 16, 1989) (NO. A89A1336)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
368 Brooks v. State, 317 S.E.2d 552, 553+, 170 Ga.App. 440, 440+ (Ga.App. Mar 06, 1984) (NO. 67245,
67246) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
369 Sharma v. State, Dept. of Land and Natural Resources, 673 P.2d 1030, 1034, 66 Haw. 632, 638
(Hawai'i Nov 30, 1983) (NO. 8686) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
370 Holdman v. Olim, 581 P.2d 1164, 1170, 59 Haw. 346, 356 (Hawai'i Jul 18, 1978) (NO. 5963) " HN:
10 (S.Ct.)
371 State v. Taylor, 425 P.2d 1014, 1020, 49 Haw. 624, 633 (Hawai'i Apr 04, 1967) (NO. 4529) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
372 City of Chicago v. Rosser, 264 N.E.2d 158, 161, 47 Ill.2d 10, 14 (Ill. Nov 17, 1970) (NO. 42721)
373 People v. Thomas, 872 N.E.2d 438, 443+, 374 Ill.App.3d 319, 324+, 313 Ill.Dec. 455, 460+ (Ill.App.
2 Dist. Jun 27, 2007) (NO. 2-05-0569) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
374 City of Joliet v. Franklin, 613 N.E.2d 766, 769+, 244 Ill.App.3d 418, 422+, 184 Ill.Dec. 449, 452+
(Ill.App. 3 Dist. Apr 23, 1993) (NO. 3-92-0164) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
375 People v. DeRossett, 604 N.E.2d 500, 510, 237 Ill.App.3d 315, 329, 178 Ill.Dec. 244, 254 (Ill.App. 4
Dist. Nov 25, 1992) (NO. 4-92-0163) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
376 People v. Thompson, 372 N.E.2d 117, 119+, 56 Ill.App.3d 557, 561+, 14 Ill.Dec. 312, 314+ (Ill.App.
3 Dist. Jan 09, 1978) (NO. 77-103) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
377 People v. Witzkowski, 357 N.E.2d 1348, 1352, 44 Ill.App.3d 152, 157, 2 Ill.Dec. 905, 909 (Ill.App.
4 Dist. Dec 02, 1976) (NO. 12727) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
378 Taylor v. State, 910 N.E.2d 864+ (Ind.App. Jul 30, 2009) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 49A020812-CR-1062) " HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
379 A.E.B. v. State, 756 N.E.2d 536, 541, 157 Ed. Law Rep. 848, 848 (Ind.App. Oct 03, 2001) (NO.
49A02-0105-JV-262) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
380 State v. Hardin, 498 N.W.2d 677, 680 (Iowa Apr 21, 1993) (NO. 438, 91-1777) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
381 O'Leary v. Com., 441 S.W.2d 150, 157 (Ky. May 09, 1969) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
382 City of Baton Rouge v. Norman, 290 So.2d 865, 868 (La. Feb 18, 1974) (NO. 53868) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
383 State v. Cuevas, 466 So.2d 559, 560 (La.App. 5 Cir. Mar 11, 1985) (NO. 84-KA-417) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
384 Com. v. Wiseman, 249 N.E.2d 610, 617, 356 Mass. 251, 261 (Mass. Jun 24, 1969)
385 Com. v. Egleson, 244 N.E.2d 589, 592+, 355 Mass. 259, 262+ (Mass. Jan 30, 1969) " HN: 10
(S.Ct.)
386 Stover v. Prince George's County, 752 A.2d 686, 695, 132 Md.App. 373, 390 (Md.App. Jun 02,
2000) (NO. 775 SEPT.TERM 1999) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
387 State v. Chiapetta, 513 A.2d 831, 834 (Me. Jul 30, 1986) (NO. 4202, YOR-85-494) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
388 State v. Burrill, 2000 WL 33675774, *2 (Me.Super. Jul 06, 2000) (NO. AR-00-01) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
389 Maldonado v. Ford Motor Co., 719 N.W.2d 809, 825, 476 Mich. 372, 403 (Mich. Jul 31, 2006) (NO.
126274)
390 People v. Harrison, 178 N.W.2d 650, 652, 383 Mich. 585, 592 (Mich. Jul 11, 1970) (NO. 15) "
391 People v. Weinberg, 149 N.W.2d 248, 253, 6 Mich.App. 345, 355, 1 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9778, 9778
(Mich.App. Mar 28, 1967) (NO. 1660) " HN: 7,8 (S.Ct.)
392 State v. Quinnell, 151 N.W.2d 598, 604, 277 Minn. 63, 70 (Minn. Jun 09, 1967) (NO. 39818)
393 State v. Phillips, 508 S.W.2d 240, 243 (Mo.App. Apr 02, 1974) (NO. 34874, 34875) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
394 In re K.J., 231 P.3d 75, 77, 355 Mont. 257, 257, 2010 MT 41, 41 (Mont. Mar 02, 2010) (NO. DA 09-
0335) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)

395 Dorn v. Board of Trustees of Billings School Dist. No. 2, 661 P.2d 426, 431, 203 Mont. 136, 144, 10
Ed. Law Rep. 415, 415 (Mont. Mar 17, 1983) (NO. 82-139) "
396 State v. Jarrette, 202 S.E.2d 721, 740, 284 N.C. 625, 655 (N.C. Feb 25, 1974) (NO. 46) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
397 McGlynn v. New Jersey Public Broadcasting Authority, 439 A.2d 54, 64, 88 N.J. 112, 133, 50 Rad.
Reg. 2d (P & F) 867, 867, 27 A.L.R.4th 322, 322, 7 Media L. Rep. 2446, 2446 (N.J. Oct 19, 1981)
(NO. A-38)
398 State v. Schmid, 423 A.2d 615, 632, 84 N.J. 535, 567 (N.J. Nov 25, 1980) (NO. A-100) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
399 Borough of Collingswood v. Ringgold, 331 A.2d 262, 271, 66 N.J. 350, 365 (N.J. Jan 24, 1975) HN:
2 (S.Ct.)
400 Hynes v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Oradell, 331 A.2d 277, 285, 66 N.J. 376, 391 (N.J. Jan
24, 1975) (in dissent)
401 State v. Hamilton, 845 A.2d 669, 672, 368 N.J.Super. 151, 157 (N.J.Super.A.D. Apr 05, 2004) (NO.
A-2521-02T3, A-2519-02T3) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
402 State v. Besson, 266 A.2d 175, 178+, 110 N.J.Super. 528, 535+ (N.J.Co. May 27, 1970)
403 Futrell v. Ahrens, 540 P.2d 214, 217, 88 N.M. 284, 287, 78 A.L.R.3d 1101, 1101 (N.M. Aug 20,
1975) (NO. 10094)
404 State v. Tower, 59 P.3d 1264, 1266, 133 N.M. 32, 34, 2002-NMCA-109, 109 (N.M.App. Sep 11,
2002) (NO. 22,670) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
405 State v. Jaramillo, 498 P.2d 687, 688, 83 N.M. 800, 801 (N.M.App. Jun 02, 1972) (NO. 858) HN: 12
(S.Ct.)
406 People v. Ferber, 439 N.Y.S.2d 863, 868, 422 N.E.2d 523, 528, 52 N.Y.2d 674, 683, 7 Media L. Rep.
1417, 1417 (N.Y. May 12, 1981) (in dissent) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
407 Curle v. Ward, 416 N.Y.S.2d 549, 552, 389 N.E.2d 1070, 1073, 46 N.Y.2d 1049, 1053, 20 Empl.
Prac. Dec. P 30,066, 30066 (N.Y. Apr 03, 1979) (in dissent)
408 People v. Street, 282 N.Y.S.2d 491, 494+, 229 N.E.2d 187, 189+, 20 N.Y.2d 231, 235+ (N.Y. Jul 07,
1967) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
409 People v. Schenck, 1993 WL 853129, *2 (N.Y.Co.Ct. Jan 05, 1993) (NO. 92-093) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
410 People v. Winston, 314 N.Y.S.2d 489, 494, 64 Misc.2d 150, 155 (N.Y.Co.Ct. Sep 03, 1970)
411 People v. Rodriguez, 608 N.Y.S.2d 594, 596+, 159 Misc.2d 1065, 1068+ (N.Y.Sup. Nov 05, 1993)
(NO. 153/92, 94-065) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
412 Anderson v. WROC-TV, 441 N.Y.S.2d 220, 224, 109 Misc.2d 904, 908, 7 Media L. Rep. 1987, 1987
(N.Y.Sup. Jul 13, 1981) (NO. 10186/80)
413 People v. Alba, 430 N.Y.S.2d 923, 931, 104 Misc.2d 1095, 1102 (N.Y.Sup. Jun 30, 1980) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
414 Board of Higher Ed. of City of New York v. Students for Democratic Society, Queensborough
Community College Chapter, 300 N.Y.S.2d 983, 989, 60 Misc.2d 114, 121 (N.Y.Sup. Jun 09, 1969)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
415 People v. O'Grady, 560 N.Y.S.2d 602, 604, 147 Misc.2d 118, 119 (N.Y.Sup.App.Term Jul 18, 1990)
(NO. 90-29 AB, 1762) " HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
416 People v. Hedemann, 438 N.Y.S.2d 172, 173, 107 Misc.2d 241, 242 (N.Y.Sup.App.Term Feb 27,
1981) (NO. 458) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
417 People v. Morrisey, 614 N.Y.S.2d 686, 690+, 161 Misc.2d 295, 301+ (N.Y.City Crim.Ct. Mar 15,
1994) (NO. 93N055650-51) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
418 People v. Segal, 358 N.Y.S.2d 866, 869+, 78 Misc.2d 944, 947+ (N.Y.City Crim.Ct. Jul 31, 1974) "
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
419 People v. Krebs, 282 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1000, 54 Misc.2d 578, 582 (N.Y.City Crim.Ct. Sep 11, 1967)
420 People v. Pettigrew, 332 N.Y.S.2d 33, 41+, 69 Misc.2d 985, 993+ (N.Y.Dist.Ct. Feb 02, 1972) HN:
7,11 (S.Ct.)
421 State v. Donahue, 2005 WL 724496, *8, 2005-Ohio-1478, 1478 (Ohio App. 5 Dist. Mar 25, 2005)
(NO. 2004-CA-20) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
422 State v. Wood, 2004 WL 1631468, *2, 2004-Ohio-3879, 3879 (Ohio App. 4 Dist. Jul 15, 2004) (NO.
03CA2901)
423 State v. Collins, 1998 WL 667781, *2 (Ohio App. 12 Dist. Sep 28, 1998) (NO. CA98-01-007) HN: 7
(S.Ct.)
424 State v. McGroarty, 1997 WL 703376, *2 (Ohio App. 11 Dist. Oct 31, 1997) (NO. 96-L-158) HN:
4,7 (S.Ct.)
425 City of Warren v. Owens, 1997 WL 401536, *2 (Ohio App. 11 Dist. Jun 27, 1997) (NO. 96-T-5480)
HN: 4,7 (S.Ct.)
426 State v. Newell, 639 N.E.2d 513, 515, 93 Ohio App.3d 609, 611 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. May 11, 1994)
(NO. C-930417) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
427 City of Akron v. Bilder, 1985 WL 10788, *1 (Ohio App. 9 Dist. May 15, 1985) (NO. 11925) HN: 12
(S.Ct.)
428 State v. Stiggers, 1981 WL 10119, *2 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. Nov 18, 1981) (NO. 800761, 800762,
800763, 800764) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
429 Village of North Randall v. Pilkington, 1981 WL 10203, *2 (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Feb 12, 1981) (NO.
42513, 42514) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
430 State v. Mitchell, 288 N.E.2d 216, 225, 32 Ohio App.2d 16, 29 (Ohio App. 10 Dist. Mar 14, 1972)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
431 City of Athens v. Bromall, 252 N.E.2d 298, 299+, 20 Ohio App.2d 140, 140+ (Ohio App. 4 Dist. Aug
21, 1969) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
432 The University of Cincinnati v. Tuttle, 2007 WL 6965408, *6965408 (Trial Order) (Ohio Com.Pl.
Jun 22, 2007) Entry Granting Permanent Injunction (NO. A0704646)
433 The University of Cincinnati v. Tuttle, 2007 WL 6965409, *6965409 (Trial Order) (Ohio Com.Pl.
Jun 22, 2007) Entry Granting Permanent Injunction (NO. A0704646)
434 Doran v. Northmont Bd. of Educ., 1998 WL 35277206, *35277206 (Trial Order) (Ohio Com.Pl. Jan
07, 1998) Decision, Order and Entry Sustaining in Part and Overruling in Part Defendants'
Motion to Strike and Sustaining in Part and Overruling in Part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss
or in the Alternative for ... (NO. 97-5851) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
435 South Discount Foods, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union Local 1552, 235 N.E.2d 143, 147, 14 Ohio Misc.
188, 194, 43 O.O.2d 418, 418 (Ohio Com.Pl. Feb 13, 1968) (NO. 130948)
436 Stahl v. State, 665 P.2d 839, 841+, 9 Media L. Rep. 1945, 1945+, 1983 OK CR 90, 90+
(Okla.Crim.App. Jun 22, 1983) (NO. M-80-326, M-80-377, M-80-328) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
437 Huffman and Wright Logging Co. v. Wade, 857 P.2d 101, 112, 317 Or. 445, 460, 62 USLW 2148,
2148 (Or. Aug 19, 1993) (NO. CC L87-2850, CA A61324, SC S38633) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
438 Brush v. Pennsylvania State University, 414 A.2d 48, 53, 489 Pa. 243, 252 (Pa. Apr 24, 1980) HN:
10 (S.Ct.)
439 Logan Valley Plaza, Inc. v. Amalgamated Food Emp. Union Local 590, AFL-CIO, 227 A.2d 874,
877, 425 Pa. 382, 388, 64 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2699, 2699, 55 Lab.Cas. P 51,645, 51645 (Pa. Mar 21,
1967) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
440 Bala v. Com., Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review, 400 A.2d 1359, 1366, 42 Pa.Cmwlth.
487, 498 (Pa.Cmwlth. May 08, 1979)
441 Com. v. Suplee, 387 A.2d 85, 91, 255 Pa.Super. 351, 363 (Pa.Super. Apr 13, 1978)
442 Brush v. Pennsylvania State University Bd. of Trustees of Pennsylvania State University, 375 A.2d
810, 812+, 249 Pa.Super. 164, 168+ (Pa.Super. Jun 29, 1977) " HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
443 Com. v. Carney, 1972 WL 16066, *5, 58 Pa. D. & C.2d 345, 352, 94 Dauph. 405, 405 (Pa.Com.Pl.
1972) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
444 Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Christ's Church in Action, 1985 WL 663596, *2+ (R.I.Super. Dec 13,
1985) (NO. 85-0875) " HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
445 State v. Lyons, 802 S.W.2d 590, 593, 65 Ed. Law Rep. 958, 958 (Tenn. Jun 11, 1990) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
446 State v. Morton, 1991 WL 80204, *5+ (Tenn.Crim.App. May 17, 1991) (NO. 902, 903, 905, 906,
916, 917, 918) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
447 State v. Peters, 1990 WL 145426, *2 (Tenn.Crim.App. Oct 05, 1990) (NO. C.C.A. 889) " HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
448 Valenzuela v. Aquino, 853 S.W.2d 512, 516 (Tex. May 05, 1993) (NO. D-0740) (in dissent) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
449 Deeds v. State, 474 S.W.2d 718, 721+ (Tex.Crim.App. Nov 09, 1971) (NO. 44169) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
450 Thomas v. City of Danville, 152 S.E.2d 265, 269, 207 Va. 656, 662 (Va. Jan 16, 1967) HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
451 State v. Colby, 972 A.2d 197, 204, 185 Vt. 464, 245 Ed. Law Rep. 298, 298, 2009 VT 28, 28 (Vt.
Mar 13, 2009) (NO. 07-317, 07-376) " HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
452 City of Seattle v. Mighty Movers, Inc., 96 P.3d 979, 989+, 152 Wash.2d 343, 361+ (Wash. Sep 09,
2004) (NO. 73005-9) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
453 City of Bremerton v. Widell, 51 P.3d 733, 743, 146 Wash.2d 561, 580 (Wash. Jun 06, 2002) (NO.
67451-5) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
454 City of Seattle v. Buchanan, 584 P.2d 918, 937, 90 Wash.2d 584, 621 (Wash. Sep 28, 1978) (NO.
44199) (in dissent) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
455 State v. Martinez, 538 P.2d 521, 525, 85 Wash.2d 671, 678 (Wash. Jul 24, 1975) (NO. 43510)
456 Hughes v. Kramer, 511 P.2d 1344, 1349, 82 Wash.2d 537, 545 (Wash. Jul 19, 1973) (NO. 42547)
457 State v. Dixon, 479 P.2d 931, 938, 78 Wash.2d 796, 808 (Wash. Jan 14, 1971) (NO. 40971) "
458 Hillside Community Church, Inc. v. City of Tacoma, 455 P.2d 350, 356+, 76 Wash.2d 63, 73+
(Wash. May 22, 1969) (NO. 39672)
459 State v. James, 2000 WL 1580986, *2, 103 Wash.App. 1008, 1008 (Wash.App. Div. 1 Oct 23, 2000)
(NO. 45049-2-I) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
460 State v. Kutch, 951 P.2d 1139, 1141, 90 Wash.App. 244, 247 (Wash.App. Div. 3 Feb 26, 1998) (NO.
16375-0-III) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
461 State v. Morgan, 896 P.2d 731, 733, 78 Wash.App. 208, 211 (Wash.App. Div. 3 Jun 20, 1995) (NO.
12436-3-III) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
462 State v. Blair, 827 P.2d 356, 358, 65 Wash.App. 64, 67 (Wash.App. Div. 1 Apr 13, 1992) (NO.
25726-9-I) " HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
463 State v. Gossett, 527 P.2d 91, 93+, 11 Wash.App. 864, 869+ (Wash.App. Div. 1 Sep 23, 1974) (NO.
2175-1) " HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
464 Sutherland v. Southcenter Shopping Center, Inc., 478 P.2d 792, 798, 3 Wash.App. 833, 844
(Wash.App. Div. 1 Dec 18, 1970) (NO. 868-I)
465 My's Restaurant, Inc. v. Hotel, Motel, Restaurant and Bartenders Union, Local 571, AFL-CIO, 1970
WL 7644, *4, 76 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2393, 2393, 64 Lab.Cas. P 52,461, 52461 (Wis.Cir. Dec 07, 1970)
(NO. 70-322) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
466 Wheeling Park Com'n v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees, Intern. Union, AFL-CIO, 479 S.E.2d 876,
883, 198 W.Va. 215, 222 (W.Va. Nov 18, 1996) (NO. 23448)
467 State v. Thorne, 333 S.E.2d 817, 820, 175 W.Va. 452, 454 (W.Va. Jul 09, 1985) (NO. 16465)
468 State v. Flinn, 208 S.E.2d 538, 546, 158 W.Va. 111, 124 (W.Va. Jul 02, 1974) (NO. CC888-CC890) "
HN: 2,7,9 (S.Ct.)
469 Hermina Gonzalez v. Srio. del Trabajo, 107 D.P.R. 667, 675, 7 P.R. Offic. Trans. 740, 740 (P.R. Oct
05, 1978) (NO. O-78-55)
470 Velez Martinez v. Administracion De Correccion, 2006 WL 2261330, *1 (TCA Jun 30, 2006) (NO.
KLRA0600403)
471 Penza Lopez v. Administracion De Correccion, 2006 WL 2345532, *2 (TCA Jun 15, 2006) (NO.
KLRA0600324)
472 State Parks, 1977 WL 555, *4+, 3 Pa. D. & C.3d 617, 623+ (Pa.Dept.Just. Sep 29, 1977) HN: 10
(S.Ct.)
473 Pettibone v. Ho-Chunk Nation Legislature, 4 Am. Tribal Law 330, 342 (Ho-Chunk Trial Ct. May 15,
2002) (NO. CV01-84) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
Mentioned
474 Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School Dist., 113 S.Ct. 2141, 2146, 508 U.S. 384,
391, 124 L.Ed.2d 352, 352, 61 USLW 4549, 4549, 83 Ed. Law Rep. 30, 30 (U.S.N.Y. Jun 07, 1993)
(NO. 91-2024) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
475 FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas, 110 S.Ct. 596, 614, 493 U.S. 215, 244, 107 L.Ed.2d 603, 603, 58
USLW 4079, 4079 (U.S.Tex. Jan 09, 1990) (NO. 87-2012, 87-2051, 88-49)
476 Jackson v. Virginia, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2786+, 443 U.S. 307, 314+, 61 L.Ed.2d 560, 560+ (U.S.Va. Jun
28, 1979) (NO. 78-5283) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
477 Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Willingboro Tp., 97 S.Ct. 1614, 1618, 431 U.S. 85, 93, 52 L.Ed.2d 155,
155 (U.S.N.J. May 02, 1977) (NO. 76-357)
478 Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville, 95 S.Ct. 2268, 2272, 422 U.S. 205, 209, 45 L.Ed.2d 125, 125, 1
Media L. Rep. 1508, 1508 (U.S.Fla. Jun 23, 1975) (NO. 73-1942)
479 Pell v. Procunier, 94 S.Ct. 2800, 2806, 417 U.S. 817, 826, 41 L.Ed.2d 495, 495, 1 Media L. Rep.
2379, 2379 (U.S.Cal. Jun 24, 1974) (NO. 73-754, 73-918)
480 Saxbe v. Washington Post Co., 94 S.Ct. 2811, 2814, 417 U.S. 843, 849, 41 L.Ed.2d 514, 514, 1
Media L. Rep. 2314, 2314 (U.S.Dist.Col. Jun 24, 1974) (NO. 73-1265)
481 Anderson v. U. S., 94 S.Ct. 2253, 2261, 417 U.S. 211, 223, 41 L.Ed.2d 20, 20 (U.S.W.Va. Jun 03,
1974) (NO. 73-346) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
482 Vachon v. New Hampshire, 94 S.Ct. 664, 665, 414 U.S. 478, 480, 38 L.Ed.2d 666, 666 (U.S.N.H.
Jan 14, 1974) (NO. 73-573) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
483 Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic Nat. Committee, 93 S.Ct. 2080, 2130, 412 U.S.
94, 190, 36 L.Ed.2d 772, 772, 27 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 907, 907, 1 Media L. Rep. 1855, 1855
(U.S.Dist.Col. May 29, 1973) (NO. 71-863, 71-864, 71-865, 71-866) (in dissent)
484 Police Dept. of City of Chicago v. Mosley, 92 S.Ct. 2286, 2291+, 408 U.S. 92, 97+, 33 L.Ed.2d 212,
212+ (U.S.Ill. Jun 26, 1972) (NO. 70-87) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
485 Gregory v. City of Chicago, 89 S.Ct. 946, 948, 394 U.S. 111, 115, 22 L.Ed.2d 134, 134 (U.S.Ill. Mar
10, 1969) (NO. 60)
486 Walker v. City of Birmingham, 87 S.Ct. 1824, 1829, 388 U.S. 307, 315, 18 L.Ed.2d 1210, 1210
(U.S.Ala. Jun 12, 1967) (NO. 249)
487 People Acting Through Community Effort v. Doorley, 468 F.2d 1143, 1145 (1st Cir.(R.I.) Nov 15,
1972) (NO. 72-1159) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
488 Day v. South Park Independent School Dist., 768 F.2d 696, 701, 26 Ed. Law Rep. 947, 947 (5th Cir.
(Tex.) Aug 16, 1985) (NO. 84-2119)
489 Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Commission, 656 F.2d 1012, 1020, 50 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F)
275, 275, 7 Media L. Rep. 1933, 1933 (5th Cir.(Ala.) Sep 21, 1981) (NO. 80-7546)
490 New Orleans S.S. Ass'n v. General Longshore Workers, 626 F.2d 455, 462, 105 L.R.R.M. (BNA)
2539, 2539, 89 Lab.Cas. P 12,306, 12306 (5th Cir.(La.) Sep 25, 1980) (NO. 80-3111, 80-5089) HN:
9 (S.Ct.)
491 Orange v. State of Ala., 386 F.2d 829, 830 (5th Cir.(Ala.) Nov 22, 1967) (NO. 24281) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
492 Marshall v. Local Union 20, Intern. Broth. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of
Commerce, 611 F.2d 645, 653, 103 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2111, 2111, 53 A.L.R. Fed. 572, 572, 28
Fed.R.Serv.2d 681, 681, 87 Lab.Cas. P 11,772, 11772 (6th Cir.(Ohio) Dec 19, 1979) (NO. 79-3207)
493 Speigner v. Jago, 603 F.2d 1208, 1215 (6th Cir.(Ohio) Jun 13, 1979) (NO. 78-3290) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
494 Wisconsin Action Coalition v. City of Kenosha, 767 F.2d 1248, 1251 (7th Cir.(Wis.) Jul 19, 1985)
(NO. 84-2006) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
495 U. S. Labor Party v. Oremus, 619 F.2d 683, 688 (7th Cir.(Ill.) Apr 24, 1980) (NO. 79-2151)
496 Collin v. Smith, 578 F.2d 1197, 1201, 3 Media L. Rep. 2490, 2490 (7th Cir.(Ill.) May 22, 1978) (NO.
78-1381, 78-1385) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
497 Lubavitch of Iowa, Inc. v. Walters, 873 F.2d 1161, 1163 (8th Cir.(Iowa) May 08, 1989) (NO. 881733)
498 Tollett v. U.S., 485 F.2d 1087, 1091 (8th Cir.(Ark.) Oct 02, 1973) (NO. 72-1498)
499 U.S. v. Kroncke, 459 F.2d 697, 702 (8th Cir.(Minn.) May 03, 1972) (NO. 71-1176, 71-1177) HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
500 U.S. v. Mechanic, 454 F.2d 849, 852, 16 A.L.R. Fed. 892, 892 (8th Cir.(Mo.) Dec 22, 1971) (NO. 711022, 71-1117)
501 Jones v. Heyman, 888 F.2d 1328, 1331 (11th Cir.(Fla.) Nov 22, 1989) (NO. 88-5858) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
502 Kroll v. U.S. Capitol Police, 847 F.2d 899, 903, 270 U.S.App.D.C. 136, 140 (D.C.Cir. Jun 07, 1988)
(NO. 83-2014)
503 Bullock v. Mumford, 509 F.2d 384, 387, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9730, 9730, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P
9866, 9866, 166 U.S.App.D.C. 51, 54 (D.C.Cir. Oct 21, 1974) (NO. 71-2058)
504 Vietnam Veterans Against The War/Winter Soldier Organization v. Morton, 506 F.2d 53, 58+, 164
U.S.App.D.C. 391, 396+ (D.C.Cir. Jun 28, 1974) (NO. 74-1667) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
505 Pursley v. City of Fayetteville, Ark., 628 F.Supp. 676, 678 (W.D.Ark. Feb 11, 1986) (NO. CIV. 855174) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
506 Paka v. Manson, 387 F.Supp. 111, 128 (D.Conn. Nov 22, 1974) (NO. CIV. H-241)
507 U.S. Postal Service v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 630 F.Supp. 867, 873, 12 Media L. Rep. 1849, 1849
(D.D.C. Mar 11, 1986) (NO. CIV. A. 85-560)
508 American Postal Workers Union v. U.S. Postal Service, 595 F.Supp. 1352, 1359 (D.D.C. Sep 25,
1984) (NO. CIV. 84-270) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
509 Sanders v. U.S., 518 F.Supp. 728, 729 (D.D.C. Jul 30, 1981) (NO. CIV. 80-3185)
510 Hodsdon v. Buckson, 310 F.Supp. 528, 533+ (D.Del. Mar 18, 1970) (NO. CIV. 3500) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
511 Frieson v. Doe, 2007 WL 496751, *3 (N.D.Fla. Feb 13, 2007) (NO. 3:06CV451MCREMT) HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
512 Hunter v. Allen, 286 F.Supp. 830, 836+ (N.D.Ga. May 20, 1968) (NO. 11328) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
513 Webb v. City of Joliet, 1999 WL 350829, *4 (N.D.Ill. May 19, 1999) (NO. 98 C 4871)
514 U.S. v. Parisi, 564 F.Supp. 855, 858 (N.D.Ill. Apr 20, 1981) (NO. 81 M 017)
515 Entertainment Network, Inc. v. Lappin, 134 F.Supp.2d 1002, 1016, 29 Media L. Rep. 1769, 1769
(S.D.Ind. Apr 18, 2001) (NO. TH01-0076-C-T/H)
516 Lipinski v. Dietrich, 578 F.Supp. 235, 240 (N.D.Ind. Jan 16, 1984) (NO. CIV. H 82-168) HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
517 Schlegel v. Craft, 2005 WL 1949551, *4 (W.D.Ky. Aug 11, 2005) (NO. CIV.A.5:03CV-268-R) HN:
9 (S.Ct.)
518 LeClair v. O'Neil, 307 F.Supp. 621, 624 (D.Mass. Dec 23, 1969) (NO. CIV 69-748-J)
519 Hurley v. Hinckley, 304 F.Supp. 704, 708 (D.Mass. Jun 20, 1969) (NO. CIV 69-88, CIV 69-100)
520 U.S. v. Handler, 383 F.Supp. 1267, 1276 (D.Md. Oct 24, 1974) (NO. CRIM R-74-0283)
521 Acanfora v. Board of Ed. of Montgomery County, 359 F.Supp. 843, 855 (D.Md. May 31, 1973) (NO.
CIV. 72-1136-Y)
522 Burnham v. Ianni, 899 F.Supp. 395, 403, 104 Ed. Law Rep. 178, 178 (D.Minn. Mar 17, 1995) (NO.
CIV. 5-94-6) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
523 United Black Community Fund Inc. v. City of St. Louis, Mo., 613 F.Supp. 739, 743 (E.D.Mo. Jun
26, 1985) (NO. 85-1050C(2)) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
524 Kay v. Bruno, 605 F.Supp. 767, 772 (D.N.H. Feb 26, 1985) (NO. CIV. 84-679-D) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
525 Moskowitz v. Cullman, 432 F.Supp. 1263, 1266 (D.N.J. Jun 01, 1977) (NO. CIV. 77-492)
526 Paulsen v. Gotbaum, 1992 WL 8361, *4 (S.D.N.Y. Jan 15, 1992) (NO. 90 CIV. 6152 (JSM)) HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
527 International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Barber, 506 F.Supp. 147, 164 (N.D.N.Y. Aug
25, 1980) (NO. 77 CV 328) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
528 Grossner v. Trustees of Columbia University in City of New York, 287 F.Supp. 535, 544 (S.D.N.Y.
Jul 09, 1968) (NO. 68 CIV. 1877)
529 Princeton Ed. Ass'n v. Princeton Bd. of Ed., 480 F.Supp. 962, 968 (S.D.Ohio Feb 20, 1979) (NO. C1-79-20)
530 International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Evans, 440 F.Supp. 414, 422 (S.D.Ohio Aug 25,
1977) (NO. C-2-77-632)
531 Startzell v. City of Philadelphia, 2007 WL 172400, *5+ (E.D.Pa. Jan 18, 2007) (NO. CIV.A.0505287) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
532 Lickteig v. Landauer, 1992 WL 164704, *8 (E.D.Pa. Jul 08, 1992) (NO. CIV. A. 91-1843) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
533 Lickteig v. Landauer, 1991 WL 161963, *8+ (E.D.Pa. Aug 14, 1991) (NO. CIV. A. 91-1843) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
534 Northeast Women's Center, Inc. v. McMonagle, 745 F.Supp. 1082, 1088 (E.D.Pa. Aug 27, 1990)
(NO. CIV A 85-4845) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
535 Armes v. City of Philadelphia, 706 F.Supp. 1156, 1163 (E.D.Pa. Feb 13, 1989) (NO. CIV.A.87-7356)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
536 Lacey v. Borough of Darby, Pa., 618 F.Supp. 331, 336 (E.D.Pa. Sep 20, 1985) (NO. CIV.A. 83-5391)
HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
537 Sill v. Pennsylvania State University, 318 F.Supp. 608, 616 (M.D.Pa. Sep 25, 1970) (NO. CIV. 70325) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
538 Duffy v. Quattrocchi, 576 F.Supp. 336, 339 (D.R.I. Dec 05, 1983) (NO. C.A. 79-0645 S)
539 Unemployed Workers Union v. Hackett, 332 F.Supp. 1372, 1377 (D.R.I. Oct 20, 1971) (NO. CIV. A.
4713) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
540 Dash v. Commanding General, Fort Jackson, S. C., 307 F.Supp. 849, 852 (D.S.C. Dec 19, 1969)
(NO. CIV. 69-303)
541 Lowery v. Jefferson County Bd. of Educ., 522 F.Supp.2d 983, 988, 228 Ed. Law Rep. 136, 136
(E.D.Tenn. Oct 09, 2007) (NO. CIV.A. 3:05-CV-570)
542 Deeds v. Beto, 353 F.Supp. 840, 843 (N.D.Tex. Jan 02, 1973) (NO. CIV. A. CA 3-6171)
543 Medrano v. Allee, 347 F.Supp. 605, 623, 80 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3016, 3016, 69 Lab.Cas. P 12,904,
12904 (S.D.Tex. Jun 26, 1972) (NO. CIV. A. 67 B 36)
544 Quarles v. State of Tex., 312 F.Supp. 835, 839 (S.D.Tex. May 11, 1970) (NO. 69-H-643)
545 Squire v. Pace, 380 F.Supp. 269, 279 (W.D.Va. Aug 09, 1974) (NO. CIV. 74-27) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
546 Huminski v. Rutland County Sheriff's Dept., 211 F.Supp.2d 520, 541 (D.Vt. Jul 11, 2002) (NO. 1:99CV-160) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
547 U. S. v. McConnico, 7 M.J. 302, 314, 4 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1483, 1483 (CMA Aug 27, 1979) (NO.
34418, CM 435387) (in dissent) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
548 Handley v. City of Montgomery, 401 So.2d 171, 181+ (Ala.Crim.App. Mar 31, 1981) (NO. 3 DIV.
195) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
549 State v. Arnariak, 941 P.2d 154, 156 (Alaska Jun 27, 1997) (NO. S-7097) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
550 Crownover v. Musick, 107 Cal.Rptr. 681, 691, 509 P.2d 497, 507, 9 Cal.3d 405, 421 (Cal. May 01,
1973) (NO. L.A. 29917, SAC. 7906, SAC.7904, SAC. 7905)
551 In re Bushman, 83 Cal.Rptr. 375, 379, 463 P.2d 727, 731, 1 Cal.3d 767, 773 (Cal. Jan 27, 1970) (NO.
CR. 13712) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
552 In re Giannini, 72 Cal.Rptr. 655, 660, 446 P.2d 535, 540, 69 Cal.2d 563, 569 (Cal. Nov 14, 1968)
(NO. CR. 11446)
553 1st Street Books v. Marin Community College Dist., 256 Cal.Rptr. 833, 843, 52 Ed. Law Rep. 657,
657 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Mar 23, 1989) (NO. A040727) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
554 Young v. Municipal Court, 94 Cal.Rptr. 331, 336, 16 Cal.App.3d 766, 774 (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Apr 19,
1971) (NO. CIV. 12688) (in dissent)
555 People v. Hairston, 87 Cal.Rptr. 470, 474, 8 Cal.App.3d Supp. 19, 26 (Cal.App.Super. May 05, 1970)
(NO. CR. 8952)
556 People v. Weeks, 591 P.2d 91, 95, 197 Colo. 175, 181 (Colo. Feb 26, 1979) (NO. 28190)
557 Handen v. People of City of Colorado Springs, 526 P.2d 1310, 1315, 186 Colo. 284, 294, 88
L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2203, 2203, 75 Lab.Cas. P 10,362, 10362 (Colo. Oct 07, 1974) (NO. C-459)
558 Markowitz v. U.S., 598 A.2d 398, 404, 60 USLW 2276, 2276 (D.C. Oct 15, 1991) (NO. 88-763, 88764, 88-865, 88-866)
559 University of Delaware v. Keegan, 318 A.2d 135, 142 (Del.Ch. Mar 28, 1974)
560 State v. Mayhew, 288 So.2d 243, 249 (Fla. Dec 19, 1973) (NO. 43575) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
561 Tenney v. State Commission on Ethics, 395 So.2d 1244, 1246 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. Mar 25, 1981) (NO.
80-1296, 80-1415) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
562 In re Hawai'i Government Employees Ass'n, AFSCME, Local 152, AFL-CIO, 170 P.3d 324, 337, 116
Hawai'i 73, 86, 183 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2011, 2011 (Hawai'i Nov 13, 2007) (NO. 27800) HN: 10
(S.Ct.)
563 Kleinjans v. Lombardi, 478 P.2d 320, 325, 52 Haw. 427, 434 (Hawai'i Dec 10, 1970) (NO. 4947)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
564 State v. Jim, 97 P.3d 395, 409, 105 Hawai'i 319, 333 (Hawai'i App. Jul 30, 2004) (NO. 25513,
25527) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
565 People v. Tosch, 501 N.E.2d 1253, 1255, 103 Ill.Dec. 715, 717, 114 Ill.2d 474, 480 (Ill. Dec 03,
1986) (NO. 62096) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
566 City of Chicago v. Lynd, 265 N.E.2d 116, 119, 47 Ill.2d 205, 209 (Ill. Dec 04, 1970) (NO. 42495)
567 Imco Container Co. v. International Chemical Workers Local Union No. 728, 1969 WL 10978, *1,
72 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2929, 2929, 61 Lab.Cas. P 52,183, 52183 (Ky.Cir.Ct. Jun 25, 1969) (NO.
128416)
568 State v. Schuller, 372 A.2d 1076, 1080, 280 Md. 305, 313 (Md. May 06, 1977) (NO. 89) HN: 10
(S.Ct.)
569 Kirstel v. State, 284 A.2d 12, 16, 13 Md.App. 482, 489, 50 A.L.R.3d 328, 328 (Md.App. Dec 01,
1971) (NO. 96) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
570 State v. Brown, 571 A.2d 816, 820 (Me. Mar 14, 1990) (NO. 5378, CUM-89-351)
571 Napier v. Jacobs, 414 N.W.2d 862, 871, 429 Mich. 222, 244 (Mich. Oct 30, 1987) (NO. 77772)
572 State v. Nickerson, 424 A.2d 190, 193, 120 N.H. 821, 825 (N.H. Dec 17, 1980) (NO. 80-058) HN:
11 (S.Ct.)
573 State v. Young, 271 A.2d 569, 579, 57 N.J. 240, 260 (N.J. Dec 07, 1970)
574 African Council v. Hadge, 604 A.2d 604, 607, 255 N.J.Super. 4, 10 (N.J.Super.A.D. Mar 13, 1992)
(NO. A-3894-90T3) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
575 State v. Karr, 291 A.2d 845, 847, 119 N.J.Super. 385, 388 (N.J.Super.A.D. Jun 12, 1972)
576 City of Elizabeth v. Sullivan, 241 A.2d 41, 44, 100 N.J.Super. 51, 57 (N.J.Co. Mar 12, 1968) (NO.
1136)
577 Smith v. State, 558 P.2d 39, 46, 89 N.M. 770, 777 (N.M. Dec 27, 1976) (NO. 11007) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
578 People v. Pennisi, 563 N.Y.S.2d 612, 614+, 149 Misc.2d 36, 38+ (N.Y.Sup. Nov 16, 1990) (NO.
1870, 5406/89) HN: 9,11 (S.Ct.)
579 Parkmed Co. v. Pro-Life Counseling, Inc., 442 N.Y.S.2d 396, 398, 110 Misc.2d 369, 370 (N.Y.Sup.
Aug 10, 1981) (NO. 10406/81)
580 Lurie v. District Attorney of Kings County, 288 N.Y.S.2d 256, 261, 56 Misc.2d 68, 70 (N.Y.Sup. Feb
27, 1968)
581 People v. O'Sullivan, 409 N.Y.S.2d 332, 333, 96 Misc.2d 52, 53 (N.Y.Sup.App.Term Jun 16, 1978)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
582 People v. Reape, 868 N.Y.S.2d 497, 499, 22 Misc.3d 615, 618, 2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 28475, 28475
(N.Y.City Crim.Ct. Nov 24, 2008) (NO. 2008KN062259)
583 People v. Maher, 520 N.Y.S.2d 309, 314, 137 Misc.2d 162, 169 (N.Y.City Crim.Ct. Sep 10, 1987)
(NO. 7N0227407) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
584 People v. Ascher, 291 N.Y.S.2d 648, 651, 57 Misc.2d 249, 251 (N.Y.City Crim.Ct. Jul 08, 1968) HN:
11 (S.Ct.)
585 People v. Schenck, 588 N.Y.S.2d 519, 522, 154 Misc.2d 937, 941 (N.Y.City Ct. Jun 16, 1992) (NO.
92V-1003, 2933) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
586 Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Cincinnati, Inc. v. Project Jericho, 556 N.E.2d 157, 161, 52 Ohio St.3d
56, 59 (Ohio Jun 20, 1990) (NO. 89-579, 89-592) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
587 State v. Condon, 789 N.E.2d 696, 704, 152 Ohio App.3d 629, 640, 2003-Ohio-2335, 2335 (Ohio
App. 1 Dist. May 09, 2003) (NO. C-020262) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
588 City of Cleveland v. Vento, 2002 WL 1041747, *4, 2002-Ohio-2613, 2613 (Ohio App. 8 Dist. May
23, 2002) (NO. 79913)
589 Cook v. Cincinnati, 658 N.E.2d 814, 819, 103 Ohio App.3d 80, 88 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. May 31, 1995)
(NO. C-930876) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
590 Cincinnati v. Thompson, 643 N.E.2d 1157, 1163, 96 Ohio App.3d 7, 16 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. Jun 30,
1994) (NO. C-920619) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
591 Norton Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Village of Arlington Heights, 1981 WL 9632, *6 (Ohio App. 1
Dist. Feb 11, 1981) (NO. 790794)
592 City of Cleveland v. Walters., 1979 WL 210394, *4 (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Feb 15, 1979) (NO. 39302)
593 C. Comella, Inc. v. United Farm Workers Organizing Committee, 292 N.E.2d 647, 654, 33 Ohio
App.2d 61, 69, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2503, 2503, 70 Lab.Cas. P 13,544, 13544 (Ohio App. 8 Dist.
Dec 14, 1972)
594 Brock v. Thompson, 948 P.2d 279, 297, 1997 OK 127, 127 (Okla. Oct 14, 1997) (NO. 88,912) HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
595 City of Eugene v. Miller, 851 P.2d 1142, 1149, 119 Or.App. 293, 306 (Or.App. Apr 21, 1993) (NO.
91-50062, 91-50073, CA A75145, CA A75143) (in dissent) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
596 Huffman and Wright Logging Co. v. Wade, 817 P.2d 1334, 1338+, 109 Or.App. 37, 43+ (Or.App.
Sep 25, 1991) (NO. L87-2850, CA A61324) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
597 State v. Heisinger, 252 N.W.2d 899, 904 (S.D. Apr 22, 1977) (NO. 11967, 11968) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
598 H & L Messengers, Inc. v. City of Brentwood, 577 S.W.2d 444, 450, 12 A.L.R.4th 835, 835, 4 Media
L. Rep. 2471, 2471 (Tenn. Feb 12, 1979)
599 Moore v. State, 519 S.W.2d 604, 613 (Tenn.Crim.App. Aug 23, 1974) (in dissent) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
600 Johnson v. State, 755 S.W.2d 92, 95 (Tex.Crim.App. Apr 20, 1988) (NO. 372-86)
601 Reed v. State, 762 S.W.2d 640, 643+, 51 Ed. Law Rep. 327, 327+ (Tex.App.-Texarkana Nov 08,
1988) (NO. 6-87-086-CR) HN: 9,11 (S.Ct.)
602 Bering v. SHARE, 721 P.2d 918, 939, 106 Wash.2d 212, 249, 55 USLW 2030, 2030 (Wash. Jun 19,
1986) (NO. 51533-6) (in dissent) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
603 State v. Spence, 490 P.2d 1321, 1324+, 5 Wash.App. 752, 758+ (Wash.App. Div. 1 Nov 15, 1971)
(NO. 854-I)
604 Matter of Hey, 452 S.E.2d 24, 31, 192 W.Va. 221, 228 (W.Va. Nov 18, 1994) (NO. 21676)
605 Allen v. Safeway Stores Inc., 699 P.2d 277, 283, 120 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2987, 2987, 104 Lab.Cas. P
55,564, 55564 (Wyo. May 02, 1985) (NO. 84-108) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
606 Pueblo v. Figueroa Jaramillo, 170 D.P.R. 932, 940, 2007TSPR83, 83 (P.R. May 04, 2007) (NO. CC2006-453)
607 Rodriguez v. Srio. de Instruccion, 109 D.P.R. 251, 264, 9 P.R. Offic. Trans. 327, 327 (P.R. Nov 27,
1979) (NO. R-76-237)
Administrative Decisions (U.S.A.)
F.C.C. Decisions
608 In the Matter of a CITIZEN'S COMPLAINT AGAINST PACIFICA FOUNDATION STATION
WBAI (FM), NEW YORK, N.Y. Declaratory Order, 1975 WL 29897, *14, 32 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F)
1331, 1331, 56 F.C.C.2d 94, 94 (F.C.C. Feb 21, 1975) (NO. FCC 75-200, BRH-13)
609 REPORT ON THE BROADCAST OF VIOLENT, INDECENT, AND OBSCENE MATERIAL,
1975 WL 30212, *24, 32 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1367, 1367, 51 F.C.C.2d 418, 418 (F.C.C. Feb 19,
1975) (NO. FCC 75-202)
Federal Trade Commission Decisions

610 IN THE MATTER OF NATIONAL COMMISSION ON EGG NUTRITION, ET AL., 1976 WL
180010, *56, 88 F.T.C. 89, 89 (F.T.C. Jul 20, 1976) (NO. 8987)
611 IN THE MATTER OF RODALE PRESS, INC., ET AL., 1967 WL 93958, *33+, 71 F.T.C. 1184,
1184+ (F.T.C. Jun 20, 1967) (NO. 8619)
State Administrative Materials (U.S.A.)

612 1986 Ariz. Op. Atty. Gen. 20, The Honorable Debbie McCune (1986)
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
613 Ark. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 2007-298, The Honorable Paul Miller (2007)
614 Ark. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 2002-179, The Honorable Joyce Elliott (2002)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
615 Ark. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 2000-081, The Honorable Ed Wilkinson (2000)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
616 Ark. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 91-307, The Honorable Vic Snyder (1991)
617 David G. Carter, Sr., 2007 WL 3326682 (Conn.A.G.), *7 (2007)
618 1977 Fla. Op. Atty. Gen. 51, To: Betty H. Baggett (1977)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
619 1980 Ga. Op. Atty. Gen. 146, To: Commissioner of Offender Rehabilitation (1980)
HN: 7,9
(S.Ct.)
620 The Honorable Norman Jesse, 1972 WL 262465 (Iowa A.G.), *1+ (1972)
HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
621 Ky. OAG 97-9, Robert R. Damron (1997)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
622 69 Md. Op. Atty. Gen. 100, Dr. Robert Y. Dubel (1984)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
623 1979-1980 Mich. Op. Atty Gen. 307, Honorable Claude A. Trim (1979)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
624 1989 N.Y. Op. Atty. Gen. (Inf.) 169, Richard J. Kaplan, Esq. (1989)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
625 1996 N.D. Op. Atty. Gen. 60, Rod Backman (1996)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
626 Okl. A.G. Opin. No. 09-37, The Honorable Joe Sweeden (2009)
HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
627 71 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 225, THE HONORABLE DOUGLAS J. MALONEY (1988)
HN: 10,12
(S.Ct.)
628 34 Or. Op. Atty. Gen. 679, Honorable Edward N. Fadeley (1969)
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
629 33 Or. Op. Atty. Gen. 97, Honorable Vernon Cook (1966)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
630 1977 Pa. Op. Atty. Gen. 46, Honorable Maurice K. Goddard (1977)
631 Marcia S. Adams, 2008 WL 4870539 (S.C.A.G.), *3+ (2008)
632 Tenn. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 08-151, Nancy Hargiss-Tatlock (2008)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
633 Tenn. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 07-148, Honorable Steve K. McDaniel (2007)
634 Tenn. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 07-61, Honorable Douglas Henry (2007)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
635 Tenn. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 04-020, Honorable Mae Beavers (2004)
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
636 Tenn. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 90-105, Senator Robert Rochelle (1990)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
637 Tenn. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 86-83, Honorable Steve Cohen (1986)
638 Tenn. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 82-458, Mr. Bob Holloway (1982)
HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
639 Tenn. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 82-236, Representative R. Brad Martin (1982)
640 Tex. Atty. Gen. Op. JM-811, Honorable Barry L. Macha (1987)
641 Mr. Douglas W. Napier, 1996 Va. Op. Atty. Gen. 28, 28 (1996)
642 1994 Va. Op. Atty. Gen. 40, The Honorable Franklin P. Hall (1994)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
643 1986-87 Va. Op. Atty. Gen. 246, The Honorable Madison E. Marye (1987)
644 60 W. Va. Op. Atty. Gen. 101, L. Clark Hansbarger, M.D. (1983)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
Other Administrative Materials (U.S.A.)

645 INTEL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT, V. KOUROSH KENNETH HAMIDI,
DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT, CCH Financial Privacy Law Guide 100-157+ (2010)
Secondary Sources (U.S.A.)

646 Participation of student in demonstration on or near campus as warranting imposition of criminal
liability for breach of peace, disorderly conduct, trespass, unlawful assembly, or similar offense, 32
A.L.R.3d 551 (1970) HN: 1,7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
647 Comment Note.--Conviction of criminal offense without evidence as denial of due process of law, 80
A.L.R.2d 1362 (1961)
648 BNA Corporate Practice Series No. 25-3 s I, I. OVERVIEW (2010)
649 Federal Civil Rights Acts s 17:24, Constitutional challenges to the validity of FACE--Vagueness and
overbreadth issues--Overbreadth (2009)
650 Federal Land Use Law & Litigation s 1:24, The Public Forum--Defining the Public Forum--Public
Property (2010) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
651 Federal Land Use Law & Litigation s 4:8, Overview--Defining the Public Forum--Public Property
(2010) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
652 Federal Jury Practice and Instructions s 166.31, Maliciously (2010) HN: 8 (S.Ct.)
653 Federal Procedural Forms s 3:479, Brief of petitioner--Illustrative statement of summary of argument
and argument--Case involving exercise of First Amendment rights on shopping center property
[Supreme Court Rule 24] (2010) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
654 Local Regulation of Adult Businesses s 2:10, Time, place, and manner regulations--Constitutional
standards--Public forums--Defining public forums (2009) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
655 32 MO Practice Series s 50.2, Tampering with or disturbing judicial proceedings (2010) HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
656 Ohio Municipal Law s 23:17, Requirement of public need to justify use of police power (2010) HN:
10 (S.Ct.)
657 Smolla & Nimmer on Freedom of Speech s 10:38, Applying the Brandenburg standard--Hecklers
and hostile audiences--Competing tensions (2010)
658 Smolla & Nimmer on Freedom of Speech s 15:54, Restraints directed to picketing, marching, or
other forms of symbolic expression--Limits on picketing and public demonstrations (2010)
659 Smolla & Nimmer on Freedom of Speech s 2:49, Absolutism as a free speech methodology--Closer
look at absolutists--distinguishing rhetoric from reality (2010) HN: 7,9,11 (S.Ct.)
660 Smolla & Nimmer on Freedom of Speech s 2:52, Absolutism as a free speech methodology-Absolutism is too simplistic to be viable--Spurious speech/conduct distinction (2010) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
661 Smolla & Nimmer on Freedom of Speech s 3:11, Viewpoint discrimination--Cross-burning reprised:
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Black--Heavy presumption against viewpoint discrimination (2010)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
662 Smolla & Nimmer on Freedom of Speech s 8:24, Examples of public and nonpublic forums--Public
schools--Discrimination against a religious point of view (2010) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
663 Smolla & Nimmer on Freedom of Speech s 8:32, Courthouses, jails, city halls (2010) HN: 7,9,11
(S.Ct.)
664 8 Tex. Prac. Series s 129.2, Riot--Participating in (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
665 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 20.45, Regulation of the Time, Place, and Manner of Speech in
Public Places and the Public Forum: Introduction (2010)
666 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 20.47(C)(I), The Caselaw leading to Perry (2010) HN: 1,7,9 (S.Ct.)
667 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 20.47(C)(II), The Three Categories of Public Forum: The Analysis
in Perry (2010) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
668 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 20.54(G)(IV), Assemblies in Special or Geographic Situations
(2010) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
669 Wharton's Criminal Law s 11, Definiteness of statutes (2009)
670 7 Witkin, California Summary 10th Constitutional Law s 393, United States Supreme Court
Decisions.
671 7 Witkin, California Summary 10th Constitutional Law s 463, Sit-in or Stand-in. HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
672 Harvey L. Zuckman et. al, Modern Communications Law s 1.2, 1.2 Interpreting the First
Amendment (1999)
673 Harvey L. Zuckman et. al, Modern Communications Law s 1.8, 1.8 Access to the Channels of
Communication (1999)
674 20 Am. Jur. Trials 1, Federal Habeas Corpus Practice (2010) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
675 Am. Jur. 2d Civil Rights s 223, Generally (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
676 Am. Jur. 2d Constitutional Law s 545, Public buildings and other public property (2010) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
677 Am. Jur. 2d Constitutional Law s 556, Restrictions (2010) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
678 Am. Jur. 2d Constitutional Law s 559, Where right to assembly may be exercised (2010)
679 Am. Jur. 2d States, Territories, and Dependencies s 64, Generally (2010) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
680 CA Jur. 3d Constitutional Law s 293, Limitations on rights of assembly (2010) HN: 1,9 (S.Ct.)
681 CJS Constitutional Law s 948, Persons not inmates (2010)
682 CJS States s 261, Public buildings and facilities (2010) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
683 CJS Trespass s 162, Trespass after notice or warning (2010)
684 CJS Trespass s 164, Constitutional right (2010)
685 TX Jur. 3d Constitutional Law s 150, Freedom of assembly and petition--When freedom of assembly
may be abridged (2010) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
686 TX Jur. 3d Constitutional Law s 199, Generally (2010) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
687 ELECTORAL INTEGRITY: MEDIA, DEMOCRACY, AND THE VALUE OF SELF-RESTRAINT,
55 Ala. L. Rev. 1, 62 (2003) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)

688 THE SPEECH CLAUSE AND THE LIMITS OF NEUTRALITY, 51 Alb. L. Rev. 19, 50 (1986)
689 SHOULD THE FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECT JOE CAMEL? TOWARD AN
UNDERSTANDING OF CONSTITUTIONAL "EXPRESSION", 32 Am. Bus. L.J. 311, 354 (1995)
690 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF FLAG BURNING: CAN NEUTRAL VALUES PROTECT
FIRST AMENDMENT PRINCIPLES?, 28 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 887, 927+ (1991) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
691 THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO WATCH TELEVISION: ANALYZING THE DIGITAL
SWITCHOVER IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 57 Am. U. L. Rev. 179, 223
(2007) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
692 A FINAL SALUTE TO LOST SOLDIERS: PRESERVING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH AT
MILITARY FUNERALS, 56 Am. U. L. Rev. 1329, 1374+ (2007)
693 THE "COLLATERAL BAR' RULE AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: THE
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ENFORCING UNCONSTITUTIONAL ORDERS, 37 Am. U. L. Rev.
323, 377 (1988)
694 COURTING JUSTICE: ADDRESSING GENDER BIAS IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM, 1996 Ann.
Surv. Am. L. 1, 57+ (1996)
695 INDECENCY ON THE CABLE: CAN IT BE REGULATED?, 26 Ariz. L. Rev. 269, 328 (1984)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
696 EQUAL ACCESS AND THE PUBLIC FORUM: PINETTE'S IMBALANCE OF FREE SPEECH
AND ESTABLISHMENT, 55 Baylor L. Rev. 167, 224 (2003)
697 MORE SPEECH, LESS NOISE: AMPLIFYING CONTENT-BASED SPEECH REGULATIONS
THROUGH BINDING INTERNATIONAL LAW, 18 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 59, 135 (1995)
698 REDRESS, PROGRESS AND THE BENCHMARK PROBLEM, 40 B.C. L. Rev. 525, 535+ (1998)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
699 BALANCING THE INTERESTS: A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO RESTRICTIONS ON
EXPRESSIVE CONDUCT IN THE ANTI-ABORTION PROTEST CONTEXT, 32 B.C. L. Rev.
835, 897 (1991) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
700 REDRESS, PROGRESS AND THE BENCHMARK PROBLEM, 19 B.C. Third World L.J. 525,
535+ (1998) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
701 THE VIEWING GALLERY OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: A FIRST AMENDMENT
PUBLIC FORUM?, 76 B.U. L. Rev. 705, 735+ (1996) HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
702 13 Bridgeport L. Rev. 783, STATE v. BALL: CONNECTICUT'S HUNTER HARASSMENT
STATUTE UNDER FIRST AMENDMENT FIRE (1993) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
703 REGULATION OF RELIGIOUS PROSELYTISM IN THE UNITED STATES, 2001 B.Y.U. L. Rev.
537, 574 (2001)
704 JUSTICE BYRON R. WHITE: A MODERN FEDERALIST AND A NEW DEAL LIBERAL, 1994
B.Y.U. L. Rev. 313, 348 (1994)
705 IN THE AFTERMATH OF JOHNSON AND EICHMAN: THE CONSTITUTION NEED NOT BE
MUTILATED TO PRESERVE THE GOVERNMENT'S SPEECH AND PROPERTY INTERESTS
IN THE FLAG, 1990 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 577, 638+ (1990) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
706 A FUNNY THING HAPPENED TO THE (NON)PUBLIC FORUM: LEBRON V. NATIONAL
RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, 62 Brook. L. Rev. 693, 751+ (1996)
707 PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE CRASHES AT KENNEDY AIRPORT, INJURING NINE:
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS, INC. v. LEE, 59 Brook. L.
Rev. 1271, 1322+ (1993) HN: 1,9,10 (S.Ct.)
708 A LESSON IN SCHOOL CENSORSHIP: HAZELWOOD v. KUHLMEIER, 55 Brook. L. Rev. 291,
325 (1989) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)

709 NATIONAL SECURITY DIRECTIVE 84: AN UNJUSTIFIABLY BROAD APPROACH TO
INTELLIGENCE PROTECTION, 51 Brook. L. Rev. 147, 189 (1984)
710 SOLICITATION ON POSTAL PREMISES: UNITED STATES V. KOKINDA, 6 BYU J. Pub. L.
199, 212+ (1992) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
711 THE DUAL LIVES OF RIGHTS: THE RHETORIC AND PRACTICE OF RIGHTS IN AMERICA,
98 Cal. L. Rev. 277, 326 (2010)
712 A NEW DOMAIN FOR PUBLIC SPEECH: OPENING PUBLIC SPACES ONLINE, 94 Cal. L.
Rev. 1791, 1825+ (2006) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
713 TEACHING THE LAW OF RACE, 89 Cal. L. Rev. 1605, 1624 (2001)
714 GETTING BEYOND SCARCITY:A NEW PARADIGM FOR ASSESSING THE
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF BROADCAST REGULATION, 85 Cal. L. Rev. 1687, 1747 (1997)
715 ZONING ADULT ENTERTAINMENT: A REASSESSMENT OF RENTON, 79 Cal. L. Rev. 119,
160 (1991)
716 A CONSTITUTIONAL LAW FOR THE AGE OF ANXIETY IDEALS, BELIEFS, ATTITUDES,
AND THE LAW; BY GUIDO CALABRESI. SYRACUSE: SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY PRESS,
1985. Pp. xv, 208. $20.00 CLOTH, $11.95 PAPER., 73 Cal. L. Rev. 1643, 1658 (1985)
717 SUPER CHIEF: EARL WARREN AND HIS SUPREME COURT A JUDICIAL BIOGRAPHY; BY
BERNARD SCHWARTZ. NEW YORK: NEW YORK UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1983. 853 PP.
$29.95, 72 Cal. L. Rev. 275, 287 (1984)
718 A GRAPHIC REVIEW OF THE FREE SPEECH CLAUSE, 70 Cal. L. Rev. 107, 150+ (1982)
719 BEAUTY CONQUERS THE FIRST AMENDMENT-MEMBERS OF THE CITY OF LOS
ANGELES v. TAXPAYERS FOR VINCENT, 7 Campbell L. Rev. 383, 407+ (1985) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
720 THE CAPITVE AUDIENCEAUDIENCE DOCTRINE AND FLOATING BUFFER ZONES: AN
ANALYSIS OF HILL V. COLORADO, 30 Cap. U. L. Rev. 769, 821+ (2002) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
721 BORN CLASSIFIED, BORN FREE: AN ESSAY FOR HENRY SCHWARZSCHILD, 19 Cardozo
L. Rev. 1369, 1392 (1998) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
722 NO JOY IN MUDVILLE FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF
THE PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE IN LIGHT OF UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST V.
GATEWAY, 56 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1147, 1175+ (2006) HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
723 POLITICAL SPEECH IN THE NONPUBLIC FORUM: CAN PUBLIC HOUSING FACILITIES
LIMIT ACCESS TO POLITICAL CANVASSERS?, 53 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 569, 583+ (2002) HN:
7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
724 ENDURING THE REIGN OF TWEEDLEDEE AND TWEEDLEDUM: HOW THE COURT
FURTHER ENTRENCHED AMERICA'S TWO-PARTY DUOPOLY IN ARKANSAS
EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION COMMISSION V. FORBES AND HOW IT CAN BE DREDGED
OUT, 49 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 257, 274 (1998) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
725 A FIRST AMENDMENT JUSTIFICATION FOR REGULATING RACIST SPEECH ON
CAMPUS, 40 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 733, 779 (1990)
726 JUDGING IN INTERESTING TIMES: THE FREE SPEECH CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE OF
JUSTICE BYRON R. WHITE, 52 Cath. U. L. Rev. 893, 914 (2003) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
727 FORUM OVER SUBSTANCE: CORNELIUS v. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION
FUND, 35 Cath. U. L. Rev. 307, 321+ (1985) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
728 CABLE, CONTENT REGULATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 32 Cath. U. L. Rev. 603,
631 (1983)
729 RELIGION AND THE CONSTITUTION: A LIBERTARIAN PERSPECTIVE, 2006 Cato Sup. Ct.
Rev. 7, 49 (2006) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)

730 "DUTY-DEFINING POWER" AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT'S CIVIL DOMAIN, 109 Colum.
L. Rev. Sidebar 116, 125 (2009) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
731 MISFIT POWER, THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND THE PUBLIC FORUM: IS THERE ROOM
IN AMERICA FOR THE GRATEFUL DEAD?, 25 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 521, 565 (1992)
732 THE SPORTS FAN v. THE SPORTS TEAM OWNER: DOES A FRANCHISE'S PROHIBITION
OF SPECTATORS' BANNERS VIOLATE THE FIRST AMENDMENT?, 24 Colum. J.L. & Soc.
Probs. 419, 455 (1991)
733 EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT: FIRST AMENDMENT PROBLEMS IN THE
REGULATION OF COIN-OPERATED NEWSPAPER VENDING MACHINES, 19 Colum. J.L. &
Soc. Probs. 183, 208 (1985)
734 YOU CAN'T SAY THAT!: ENJOINING PUBLICATION OF TRADE SECRETS DESPITE THE
FIRST AMENDMENT, 9 Computer L. Rev. & Tech. J. 393, 423+ (2005) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
735 RICO'S "PATTERN" REQUIREMENT: VOID FOR VAGUENESS?, 90 Colum. L. Rev. 489, 527
(1990)
736 FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF AMBIGUOUS CONDUCT, 84 Colum. L. Rev. 467, 505
(1984) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
737 PEACEFUL LABOR PICKETING AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 82 Colum. L. Rev. 1469,
1497 (1982)
738 FREE SPEECH RIGHTS OF HOMOSEXUAL TEACHERS, 80 Colum. L. Rev. 1513, 1534 (1980)
739 NOW OR NEVER: IS THERE ANTITRUST LIABILITY FOR NONCOMMERCIAL
BOYCOTTS?, 80 Colum. L. Rev. 1317, 1340 (1980)
740 BUCKLEY V. VALEO: THE SUPREME COURT AND FEDERAL CAMPAIGN REFORM, 76
Colum. L. Rev. 852, 891 (1976)
741 EVOLUTION TO ABSOLUTISM: JUSTICE DOUGLAS AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 74
Colum. L. Rev. 371, 411 (1974)
742 JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MILITARY SURVEILLANCE OF CIVILIANS: BIG BROTHER WEARS
MODERN ARMY GREEN, 72 Colum. L. Rev. 1009, 1047 (1972)
743 THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND REGULATION OF TELEVISION NEWS, 72 Colum. L. Rev.
746, 771+ (1972) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
744 THE RIGHT OF THE PRESS TO GATHER INFORMATION, 71 Colum. L. Rev. 838, 864 (1971)
745 BLASPHEMY, 70 Colum. L. Rev. 694, 732+ (1970) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
746 THE "TITICUT FOLLIES" CASE: LIMITING THE PUBLIC INTEREST PRIVILEGE, 70 Colum.
L. Rev. 359, 371 (1970)
747 SYMBOLIC CONDUCT, 68 Colum. L. Rev. 1091, 1126+ (1968) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
748 HALLUCINOGENS, 68 Colum. L. Rev. 521, 560 (1968)
749 A UNIFORM SYSTEM OF CITATION By Columbia Law Review, Harvard Law Review,
University of Pennsylvania Law Review, and Yale Law Journal. Cambridge, Mass.: The Harvard
Law Review Association, 11th Ed. 1967. Pp. vi, 117. $1.0, 67 Colum. L. Rev. 599, 602 (1967)
750 JUDICIAL REVIEW OF PROBATION CONDITIONS, 67 Colum. L. Rev. 181, 207 (1967) HN: 1,9
(S.Ct.)
751 DEMARCATING THE RIGHT TO GATHER NEWS: A SEQUENTIAL INTERPRETATION OF
THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 3 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol'y 113, 140+ (2008) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
752 FINDING ROOM FOR INDEPENDENT CANDIDATES IN LIGHT OF ARKANSAS
EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION COMMISSION V. FORBES, 7 CommLaw Conspectus 137, 151
(1999) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
753 TAKING THE FIRST AMENDMENT ON THE ROAD: A RATIONALE FOR BROAD
PROTECTION FOR FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION ON THE INFORMATION SUPERHIGHWAY,
3 CommLaw Conspectus 135, 143 (1995) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
754 RESOLVING THE HAZELWOOD CONUNDRUM: THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF
COLLEGE STUDENTS IN KINCAID V. GIBSON AND BEYOND, 7 Comm. L. & Pol'y 129, 156
(2002)
755 TOWARD A UNIFIED THEORY OF GOVERNMENTAL POWER TO REGULATE PROTECTED
SPEECH, 18 Conn. L. Rev. 531, 579+ (1986) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
756 DIVISION AND DISCORD: THE SUPREME COURT UNDER STONE AND VINSON, 19411953 . BY MELVIN I. UROFSKY. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA PRESS. 1997. PP. XV,
298. $39.95 CLOTH; $21.95 PAPERBACK., 18 Const. Comment. 259, 265 (2001)
757 ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AS A PROXY FOR FEDERALISM: INTUITION AND REASON IN
UNITED STATES V. MORRISON, 18 Const. Comment. 563, 582 (2001)
758 THE WARREN COURT AND AMERICAN POLITICS: AN IMPRESSIONISTIC APPRECIATION
THE WARREN COURT AND AMERICAN POLITICS. By Lucas A. (Scot) Powe, Jr. Harvard
University Press. 2000. Pp. 566. $36.95., 18 Const. Comment. 661, 698 (2001)
759 CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY AND CONSTITUTIONALLY OPTIONAL BENEFITS AND
BURDENS, 11 Const. Comment. 287, 314 (1994) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
760 DOES FOOTNOTE FOUR DESCRIBE?, 11 Const. Comment. 197, 205+ (1994) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
761 THE FUTILE SEARCH FOR ALTERNATIVE MEDIA IN SYMBOLIC SPEECH CASES, 8 Const.
Comment. 451, 461 (1991)
762 JUSTICE HARLAN AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 2 Const. Comment. 425, 459+ (1985) HN:
9 (S.Ct.)
763 REGULATING LOBBYISTS: LAW, ETHICS, AND PUBLIC POLICY, 16 Cornell J.L. & Pub.
Pol'y 1, 56 (2006)
764 FIRST AMENDMENT LIMITS ON THE USE OF TAXES TO SUBSIDIZE SELECTIVELY THE
MEDIA, 78 Cornell L. Rev. 106, 138 (1992) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
765 FLOWCHARTING THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 72 Cornell L. Rev. 936, 1024 (1987) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
766 HOW USEFUL IS JUDICIAL REVIEW IN FREE SPEECH CASES?, 69 Cornell L. Rev. 302, 340
(1984) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
767 MYTH AND REALITY IN PROTECTIVE ORDER LITIGATION, 69 Cornell L. Rev. 1, 75 (1983)
768 UNWANTED SPEECH AND THE STATE'S INTEREST IN PROTECTING RELIGIOUS FREE
EXERCISE: DRAWING FIRST AMENDMENT LINES IN OLMER V. CITY OF LINCOLN, 34
Creighton L. Rev. 423, 474 (2001)
769 WAGING WAR IN AMERICA'S CLASSROOMS: RECOGNIZING THE RELIGIOUS RIGHTS
OF CHILDREN, 31 Cumb. L. Rev. 123, 173 (2000) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
770 SUMMUM v. PLEASANT GROVE CITY: THE TENTH CIRCUIT "BINDS THE HANDS OF
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AS THEY SHAPE THE PERMANENT CHARACTER OF THEIR
PUBLIC SPACES", 85 Denv. U. L. Rev. 631, 635+ (2008) HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
771 TARPLEY V. KEISTLER: PATRONAGE, PETITION, AND THE NOERR-PENNINGTON
DOCTRINE, 50 DePaul L. Rev. 265, 312+ (2000)
772 NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS V. FINLEY: PAINTING A GRIM PICTURE FOR
FEDERALLY-FUNDED ART, 49 DePaul L. Rev. 217, 273 (1999) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
773 JURIES AND DAMAGES: A COMMENTARY, 48 DePaul L. Rev. 427, 452 (1998)
774 MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL v. TAXPAYERS FOR VINCENT: THE
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PROHIBITING TEMPORARY SIGN POSTING ON PUBLIC

PROPERTY TO ADVANCE LOCAL AESTHETIC CONCERNS, 34 DePaul L. Rev. 197, 240+
(1984)
775 THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND MILITARY INSTALLATIONS, 1984 Det. C.L. Rev. 845, 869
(1984) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
776 MUNICIPALITIES' RIGHT TO FULL COMPENSATION FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS
PROVIDERS' USES OF THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, 107 Dick. L. Rev. 623, 638 (2003)
777 FIRST AMENDMENT PUBLIC FORUM ANALYSIS: RESTRICTIONS ON THE RIGHT TO
RECEIVE INFORMATION UPHELD IN KREIMER v. BUREAU OF POLICE, 97 Dick. L. Rev.
411, 419 (1993) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
778 BEHIND THE SCENES IN IOWA'S GREATEST CASE: WHAT IS NOT IN THE OFFICIAL
RECORD OF TINKER V. DES MOINES INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
48 Drake L. Rev. 473, 490 (2000)
779 THE TINKER CASE: REFLECTIONS THIRTY YEARS LATER, 48 Drake L. Rev. 491, 506+
(2000) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
780 MUNICIPAL REGULATION OF POLITICAL SIGNS: BALANCING FIRST AMENDMENT
RIGHTS AGAINST AESTHETIC CONCERNS, 45 Drake L. Rev. 767, 787+ (1997) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
781 Constitutional Law, 43 Drake L. Rev. 727, 751+ (1995)
782 OF RUM, RIGHTS, AND RICO: ARE PLAINTIFFS INTOXICATED WITH THE POWER OF
CIVIL RICO? WHAT IS FALLING VICTIM TO THE STATUTE?, 40 Drake L. Rev. 577, 602+
(1991) HN: 4,7,9 (S.Ct.)
783 PRIOR RESTRAINT: A RATIONAL DOCTRINE OR AN ELUSIVE COMPENDIUM OF
HACKNEYED CLICHES?, 36 Drake L. Rev. 265, 285+ (1987) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
784 CONDUIT-BASED REGULATION OF SPEECH, 54 Duke L.J. 1359, 1456+ (2005) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
785 CONTENT AND CONTEXT: THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF WILLIAM VAN ALSTYNE TO FIRST
AMENDMENT INTERPRETATION, 54 Duke L.J. 1623, 1660+ (2005)
786 SOME REALISM ABOUT PLURALISM: LEGAL REALIST APPROACHES TO THE FIRST
AMENDMENT, 1990 Duke L.J. 375, 430 (1990) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
787 CABLE TELEVISION AND THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, 1988 Duke L.J. 329, 388 (1988)
788 THE MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS: A LEGITIMIZING MYTH, 1984 Duke L.J. 1, 91+ (1984) HN:
11 (S.Ct.)
789 GROUP LIBEL VERSUS FREE SPEECH: WHEN BIG BROTHER SHOULD BUTT IN, 23 Duq.
L. Rev. 77, 130+ (1984) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
790 LYNG v. NORTHWEST INDIAN CEMETERY PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: BULLDOZING
FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF INDIAN SACRED LANDS, 16 Ecology L.Q. 515, 570
(1989)
791 AIMING FOR CONSTITUTIONALITY IN THE FIRST AMENDMENT FOREST: AN ANALYSIS
OF HUNTER HARASSMENT STATUTES, 48 Emory L.J. 1023, 1055+ (1999) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
792 DEATH TOLL FOR THE DEAD HAND?: THE SURVIVABILITY OF THE DEAD HAND
PROVISION IN CORPORATE AMERICA, 48 Emory L.J. 991, 1021+ (1999)
793 MISREPRESENTATION IN POLITICAL ADVERTISING: THE ROLE OF LEGAL SANCTIONS,
36 Emory L.J. 853, 916 (1987) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
794 FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT OF ACCESS TO PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL
CASES, 32 Emory L.J. 619, 688 (1983)
795 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - FIRST AMENDMENT - STATE UNIVERSITY'S POLICY OF
EQUAL ACCESS TO CAMPUS FACILITIES FOR ALL ORGANIZATIONS INCLUDING
THOSE OF A RELIGIOUS CHARACTER DOES NOT VIOLATE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF

RELIGION CLAUSE O, 32 Emory L.J. 319, 348 (1983)
796 PROBLEMS OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES FOR POLITICAL PROTEST AND CIVIL
DISOBEDIENCE, 25 Envtl. L. 495, 511+ (1995) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
797 PARENTAL ACCESS TO EDUCATIONAL DECISION MAKING BEYOND CHAPTER I:
AFFIRMATIVE OVERTONES OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 20 Fam. L.Q. 13, 26+ (1986) HN:
10,12 (S.Ct.)
798 REGULATION OF FREE SPEECH IN ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY: AN ANALYSIS
OF THE VISITORS' RULES (PART I), 34 Fed. B. News & J. 85, 87+ (1987) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
799 IN SEARCH OF A SMOKING GUN: TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH NONDISCLOSURE
AGREEMENTS AS AN OBSTACLE TO NEWSGATHERING, 50 Fed. Comm. L.J. 483, 512
(1998)
800 HOW FREE IS THE SPEECH OF PUBLIC SCHOOL STUDENTS?, 74-JUN Fla. B.J. 79, 82
(2000) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
801 CIVIL RESISTANCE: THE DICTATES OF CONSCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
VERSUS THE AMERICAN JUDICIARY, 6 Fla. J. Int'l L. 5, 19+ (1990) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
802 WARD v. ROCK AGAINST RACISM: HOW TIME, PLACE AND MANNER FURTHER
RESTRICT THE PUBLIC FORUM, 1 Fordham Ent. Media & Intell. Prop. L.F. 151, 173 (1991)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
803 DISPLACING DISSENT: THE ROLE OF "PLACE" IN FIRST AMENDMENT
JURISPRUDENCE, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 2587, 2639 (2007)
804 NONCOMMERCIAL DOOR-TO-DOOR SOLICITATION AND THE PROPER STANDARD OF
REVIEW FOR MUNICIPAL TIME, PLACE, AND MANNER RESTRICTIONS, 55 Fordham L.
Rev. 1139, 1163+ (1987) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
805 PUBLIC FORUM ANALYSIS AND STATE OWNED PUBLICATIONS: BEYOND KUHLMEIER
v. HAZELWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT, 55 Fordham L. Rev. 241, 262+ (1986) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
806 PUBLIC FORUM ANALYSIS AFTER PERRY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION v. PERRY LOCAL
EDUCATORS' ASSOCIATION--A CONCEPTUAL APPROACH TO CLAIMS OF FIRST
AMENDMENT ACCESS TO PUBLICLY OWNED PROPERTY, 54 Fordham L. Rev. 545, 562+
(1986) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
807 ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING: FIRST AMENDMENT ISSUES IN THE TWENTY-FIRST
CENTURY, 13 Fordham Urb. L.J. 801, 868 (1985)
808 FREE SPEECH AT THE BALL PARK? MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL VIOLATES THE FIRST
AMENDMENT, 3 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 227, 269+ (1993) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
809 SPACE, PLACE, AND SPEECH: THE EXPRESSIVE TOPOGRAPHY, 74 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 439,
505+ (2006) HN: 4,7,9 (S.Ct.)
810 THE FIRST AMENDMENT, THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE DISTINCTION, AND
NONGOVERNMENTAL SUPPRESSION OF WARTIME POLITICAL DEBATE, 73 Geo. Wash. L.
Rev. 101, 173 (2004) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
811 TRAVEL THAT TALKS: TOWARD FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION FOR FREEDOM OF
MOVEMENT, 65 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 106, 129+ (1996) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
812 RUST v. SULLIVAN AND THE CONTROL OF KNOWLEDGE, 61 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 587, 656
(1993) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
813 FREE SPEECH v. PUBLIC SAFETY WITHIN PUBLIC FORUM ANALYSIS, 59 Geo. Wash. L.
Rev. 1285, 1310+ (1991) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
814 FIRST AMENDMENT Regulating Embassy Picketing in the Public Forum, 55 Geo. Wash. L. Rev.
908, 922+ (1987) HN: 9,10,12 (S.Ct.)
815 THE TRASHING OF THE PUBLIC FORUM: PROBLEMS IN FIRST AMENDMENT

ANALYSIS, 55 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 109, 122+ (1986) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
816 LONELY PAMPHLETEERS, LITTLE PEOPLE, AND THE SUPREME COURT: THE DOCTRINE
OF TIME, PLACE, AND MANNER REGULATIONS OF EXPRESSION, 54 Geo. Wash. L. Rev.
757, 811+ (1986) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
817 TIME, PLACE, OR MANNER RESTRICTIONS ON COMMERCIAL SPEECH, 52 Geo. Wash. L.
Rev. 127, 145 (1983) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
818 NOTE: GIULIANI, BROKEN WINDOWS, AND THE RIGHT TO BEG, 6 Geo. J. on Poverty L. &
Pol'y 165, 194+ (1999) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
819 "DROWNED IN ADVERTISING CHATTER": THE CASE FOR REGULATING AD TIME ON
TELEVISION, 94 Geo. L.J. 1229, 1264+ (2006)
820 THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS: A SEARCH FOR AN EQUITABLE GRANT
MAKING PROCESS, 74 Geo. L.J. 1521, 1551 (1986) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
821 CHARGING FOR FREE SPEECH: USER FEES AND INSURANCE IN THE MARKETPLACE
OF IDEAS, 74 Geo. L.J. 257, 361 (1985)
822 STUDENT RELIGIOUS GROUPS AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO PUBLIC SCHOOL
ACTIVITY PERIODS, 74 Geo. L.J. 205, 231 (1985) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
823 RESTRICTIONS ON PRESS COVERAGE OF MILITARY OPERATIONS: THE RIGHT OF
ACCESS, GRENADA, AND "OFF-THE-RECORD WARS', 73 Geo. L.J. 931, 973 (1985) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
824 THE WARREN COURT AND THE VIETNAM WAR: THE LIMITS OF LEGAL LIBERALISM,
33 Ga. L. Rev. 65, 154 (1998) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
825 CAMOUFLAGED INCITEMENT: FREEDOM OF SPEECH, COMMUNICATIVE TORTS, AND
THE BORDERLAND OF THE BRANDENBURG TEST, 29 Ga. L. Rev. 1, 80 (1994) HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
826 CULTS AND CONVERSION: THE CASE FOR INFORMED CONSENT, 16 Ga. L. Rev. 533, 574
(1982)
827 FREEDOM OF SPEECH AFTER JUSTICE BRENNAN, 23 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 413, 534
(1993) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
828 SAN DIEGO COMMITTEE AGAINST REGISTRATION AND THE DRAFT v. GOVERNING
BOARD OF THE GROSSMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT: PUBLIC FORUM
ANALYSIS IN THE HIGH SCHOOL CONTEXT, 17 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 23, 49+ (1987) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
829 WILLIAM O. DOUGLAS: THE GADFLY OF WASHINGTON, 40 Gonz. L. Rev. 259, 291+ (2005)
HN: 1,4,9 (S.Ct.)
830 THE WHITE SUPREMACIST STATUS QUO: HOW THE AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM
PERPETUATES RACISM AS SEEN THROUGH THE LENS OF PROPERTY LAW, 21 Hamline J.
Pub. L. & Pol'y 137, 175+ (1999) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
831 LOITERING LAWS:DOES BEING "TOUGH ON CRIME" JUSTIFY THE CITY OF
MINNEAPOLIS' USE OF A VAGUE AND BROADLY CONSTRUCTED ORDINANCE, WHICH
CRIMINALIZES OUR THOUGHTS IN VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT?, 20
Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol'y 147, 176 (1998)
832 DRESSING UP A CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE: FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF
SCHOOL UNIFORM PROTESTS IN LOWRY V. WATSON CHAPEL SCHOOL DISTRICT AND
THE THREADS REMAINING TO ENFORCE SCHOOL POLICIES, 32 Hamline L. Rev. 609, 655
(2009)
833 OF BURNING CROSSES AND CHILLED EXPRESSION: MINNESOTA AND THE EIGHT
CIRCUIT MODERATE FIRST AMENDMENT MANDATES IN "HATE SPEECH"

PROSECUTIONS: IN RE R.A.V. AND UNITED STATES v. LEE(FN2), 15 Hamline L. Rev. 167,
193 (1991)
834 THE ILLUSION OF RESIDENTIAL PRIVACY: THE DOCTRINE OF TIME, PLACE, AND
MANNER REGULATION REVISITED, FRISBY v. SCHULTZ, 108 S.CT. 2495 (1988), 12
Hamline L. Rev. 447, 475 (1989) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
835 THE PROBLEM WITH POSNER AS ART CRITIC: LINNEMEIR V. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
PURDUE UNIVERSITY FORT WAYNE, 37 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 185, 206 (2002)
836 RACISM, RIGHTS AND THE QUEST FOR EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY: A CRITICAL
LEGAL ESSAY, 23 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 295, 392 (1988)
837 THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT: TRENDS AND PROSPECTS, 21 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L.
Rev. 1, 26 (1986)
838 FREE SPEECH AND UNION NEWSPAPERS: INTERNAL DEMOCRACY AND TITLE I
RIGHTS, 20 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 485, 523 (1985) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
839 CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON THE POWER TO RESTRICT ACCESS TO PRISONS: AN
HISTORICAL RE-EXAMINATION, 18 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 409, 455+ (1983)
840 ACCESS TO JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS: TO RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS AND BEYOND, 16
Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 415, 459 (1981)
841 ANTITRUST IMMUNITY: STATE ACTION AND FEDERALISM, PETITIONING AND THE
FIRST AMENDMENT, 17 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 293, 400+ (1994) HN: 7,10 (S.Ct.)
842 VIRTUAL CONSTITUTIONS: THE CREATION OF RULES FOR GOVERNING PRIVATE
NETWORKS, 8 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 129, 153 (1994) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
843 THE NOT-SO-BRAVE NEW CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER The New Constitutional Order. By
Mark Tushnet. 2003. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Pp. x, 265. $29.95 (cloth), 117
Harv. L. Rev. 647, 687 (2003)
844 PRINCIPLES, INSTITUTIONS, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 112 Harv. L. Rev. 84, 120
(1998)
845 PUBLIC FORUM, 106 Harv. L. Rev. 279, 289 (1992) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
846 3. RESIDENTIAL PICKETING, 102 Harv. L. Rev. 261, 271 (1988)
847 TOO CLOSE FOR COMFORT: PROTESTING OUTSIDE MEDICAL FACILITIES, 101 Harv. L.
Rev. 1856, 1875+ (1988) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
848 FOREWORD: THE CIVIL RIGHTS CHRONICLES, 99 Harv. L. Rev. 4, 83 (1985)
849 FOREWORD: FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN THE BURGER COURT, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 1, 73
(1980) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
850 VII. THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP, 93 Harv. L. Rev. 1350, 1383 (1980) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
851 3. MEDIA RIGHT OF ACCESS, 92 Harv. L. Rev. 174, 185+ (1978) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
852 HUGO BLACK AND THE JUDICIAL REVOLUTION. BY GERALD T. DUNNE. NEW YORK:
SIMON & SCHUSTER. 1977. PP. 442. $12.50., 90 Harv. L. Rev. 1733, 1745+ (1977)
853 2. POLITICAL EXPRESSION ON MILITARY BASES., 90 Harv. L. Rev. 152, 159+ (1976) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
854 4. REGULATION OF CAMPAIGN SPENDING AND PUBLIC FINANCING OF ELECTIONS., 90
Harv. L. Rev. 171, 186 (1976)
855 THE RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC AND THE PRESS TO GATHER INFORMATION, 87 Harv. L.
Rev. 1505, 1533 (1974)
856 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - FREEDOM OF SPEECH - OWNERS' FIFTH AMENDMENT
PROPERTY RIGHTS PREVENT A STATE CONSTITUTION FROM PROVIDING BROADER
FREE SPEECH RIGHTS THAN PROVIDED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT. - LENRICH

ASSOCIATES v. HEYDA,, 86 Harv. L. Rev. 1592, 1607+ (1973) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
857 V. THE EXERCISE OF EMERGENCY POWERS, 85 Harv. L. Rev. 1284, 1326 (1972) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
858 G. FREEDOM OF SPEECH, PRESS, AND ASSOCIATION 1. NATIONAL SECURITY AND
FREEDOM OF THE PRESS., 85 Harv. L. Rev. 199, 212 (1971)
859 LEGAL ANALYSIS AND POPULATION CONTROL: THE PROBLEM OF COERCION, 84 Harv.
L. Rev. 1856, 1911 (1971) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
860 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - RIGHT OF PRIVACY - PRIVACY OF MENTAL HOSPITAL
INMATES WILL BE PROTECTED BY AN INJUNCTION PROHIBITING OPEN PUBLIC
EXHIBITION OF A MOTION PICTURE DEPICTING HOSPITAL CONDITIONS. COMMONWEALTH v. WISEMA, 83 Harv. L. Rev. 1722, 1731 (1970) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
861 THE FIRST AMENDMENT OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE, 83 Harv. L. Rev. 844, 927+ (1970)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
862 3. POLITICAL PROTEST IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 83 Harv. L. Rev. 154, 161 (1969) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
863 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - FREEDOM OF SPEECH - MUNICIPAL TRANSIT DISTRICT'S
REFUSAL TO ACCEPT ANTI-WAR ADVERTISEMENT WHILE PERMITTING COMMERCIAL
AND ELECTION-RELATED ADVERTISING VIOLATES FIRST AMENDMENT. - WIRTA V.
ALAMEDA-CON, 82 Harv. L. Rev. 1379, 1382+ (1969) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
864 2. PICKETING IN A PRIVATELY OWNED SHOPPING CENTER, 82 Harv. L. Rev. 130, 138+
(1968) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
865 III. ACADEMIC FREEDOM OF STUDENTS, 81 Harv. L. Rev. 1128, 1131+ (1968) HN: 7,9
(S.Ct.)
866 B. CIVIL RIGHTS, 81 Harv. L. Rev. 138, 141+ (1967) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
867 REGULATION OF DEMONSTRATIONS, 80 Harv. L. Rev. 1773, 1777+ (1967) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
868 IV. CONSTITUTIONAL POWER - THE APPLICATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO
COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING, 80 Harv. L. Rev. 1027, 1038 (1967)
869 WAS BRANDEIS AN ACTIVIST? THE SEARCH FOR INTERMEDIATE PREMISES, 80 Harv. L.
Rev. 986, 1003 (1967)
870 THE RAVE ACT: A SPECIOUS SOLUTION TO THE SERIOUS PROBLEM OF INCREASED
ECSTASY DISTRIBUTION: IS IT UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OVERBROAD?, 28 Hastings
Comm. & Ent. L.J. 229, 285 (2006)
871 A HOUSE DIVIDED: HOW JUDICIAL INACTION AND A CIRCUIT SPLIT FORFEITED THE
FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF STUDENT JOURNALISTS AT AMERICA'S
UNIVERSITIES, 35 Hastings Const. L.Q. 345, 371 (2008) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
872 NO MODERATOR NEEDED: A LIBERTY TRADITION RIGHT TO BROADCAST
ADVERTORIALS, 33 Hastings Const. L.Q. 255, 336+ (2006) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
873 FREE SPEECH FOR LAWYERS, 28 Hastings Const. L.Q. 305, 444 (2001)
874 WEIGHING THE LISTENER'S INTERESTS: JUSTICE BLACKMUN'S COMMERCIAL
SPEECH AND PUBLIC FORUM OPINIONS, 26 Hastings Const. L.Q. 165, 217+ (1998) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
875 PROTECTIVE ORDERS IN THE BANKRUPTCY COURT: THE CONGRESSIONAL MANDATE
OF BANKRUPTCY CODE SECTION 107 AND ITS CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS, 24
Hastings Const. L.Q. 67, 98 (1996)
876 MODIFICATIONS TO THE TRADITIONAL PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE: UNITED STATES v.
KOKINDA AND ITS AFTERMATH, 19 Hastings Const. L.Q. 167, 195+ (1991) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
877 THE SUPREME COURT AND FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF STUDENTS IN THE PUBLIC
SCHOOL CLASSROOM: A PROPOSED MODEL OF ANALYSIS, 12 Hastings Const. L.Q. 1, 70
(1984)
878 ON THE SCHOOL BOARD'S HIT LIST: COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT IN PROTECTING
THE FIRST AND FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL STUDENTS, 52
Hastings L.J. 1323, 1368 (2001)
879 PUBLIC FORA, NEUTRAL GOVERNMENTS, AND THE PRISM OF PROPERTY, 50 Hastings
L.J. 309, 353+ (1999) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
880 CONTENT-NEUTRAL PUBLIC FORUM REGULATIONS: THE RISE OF THE AESTHETIC
STATE INTEREST, THE FALL OF JUDICIAL SCRUTINY, 37 Hastings L.J. 439, 497+ (1986)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
881 SELF HELP, THE MEDIA AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 35 Hofstra L. Rev. 1263, 1303
(2007)
882 METROMEDIA, INC. v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, 11 Hofstra L. Rev. 371, 411+ (1982)
883 CAN COURTS REFRAIN FROM BIAS? THE FIFTH CIRCUIT'S DECISION IN TEXAS EX
REL. TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION v. KNIGHTS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN, 33
Hous. L. Rev. 1619, 1647 (1997)
884 SPIKING THE SPIKERS: THE USE OF CIVIL RICO AGAINST ENVIRONMENTAL
TERRORISTS, 32 Hous. L. Rev. 745, 773+ (1995) HN: 9,11 (S.Ct.)
885 BILLBOARD REGULATION AFTER METROMEDIA AND LUCAS, 31 Hous. L. Rev. 1555, 1607
(1995) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
886 A VERY RATIONAL COURT, 30 Hous. L. Rev. 1509, 1595+ (1993) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
887 FIRST AMENDMENT PETITION CLAUSE IMMUNITY FROM TORT SUITS: IN SEARCH OF
A CONSISTENT DOCTRINAL FRAMEWORK, 33 Idaho L. Rev. 67, 134 (1996)
888 THE CHALLENGE OF FREE SPEECH: ASIAN VALUES V. UNFETTERED FREE SPEECH, AN
ANALYSIS OF SINGAPORE AND MALAYSIA IN THE NEW GLOBAL ORDER, 9 Ind. Int'l &
Comp. L. Rev. 259, 318 (1998)
889 FACIAL CHALLENGES AND SEPARATION OF POWERS, 85 Ind. L.J. 1557, 1598+ (2010)
890 THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AND THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, 84 Ind. L.J.
885, 916 (2009)
891 FORMAT RESTRICTIONS ON TELEVISED POLITICAL ADVERTISING: ELEVATING
POLITICAL DEBATE WITHOUT SUPPRESSING FREE SPEECH, 67 Ind. L.J. 663, 717 (1992)
892 SHACKING UP WITH THE FIRST AMENDMENT: SYMBOLIC EXPRESSION AND THE
PUBLIC UNIVERSITY, 64 Ind. L.J. 711, 735 (1989)
893 THE COMMERCIAL EXCEPTION: A NECESSARY LIMITATION TO THE NOERRPENNINGTON DOCTRINE, 63 Ind. L.J. 401, 424+ (1988) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
894 ANTITRUST IMMUNITY, THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND SETTLEMENTS: DEFINING THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE RIGHT TO PETITION, 33 Ind. L. Rev. 385, 434 (2000)
895 POLICE POWER ABSOLUTISM AND NULLIFYING THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE: A
CRITIQUE OF OREGON v. SMITH, 25 Ind. L. Rev. 71, 145 (1991)
896 DELIBERATIONS AND DISCLOSURES: A STUDY OF POST-VERDICT INTERVIEWS OF
JURORS, 82 Iowa L. Rev. 465, 546 (1997)
897 A LOT MORE COMES INTO FOCUS WHEN YOU REMOVE THE LENS CAP: WHY
PROLIFERATING NEW COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES MAKE IT PARTICULARLY
URGENT FOR THE SUPREME COURT TO ABANDON ITS INSIDE-OUT APPROACH TO
FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND BR, 81 Iowa L. Rev. 883, 968 (1996)
898 THE END OF THE PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE, 78 Iowa L. Rev. 143, 203+ (1992) HN: 1,9,12
(S.Ct.)
899 SCHOOL NEWSPAPERS, PUBLIC FORUM, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 74 Iowa L. Rev.
505, 543 (1989)
900 THE MYTH OF CONSERVATISM AS A CONSTITUTIONAL PHILOSOPHY, 71 Iowa L. Rev.
401, 488 (1986)
901 THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT: 2002, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 807, 836+
(2003) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
902 HATE SPEECH AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE FAIR HOUSING LAWS, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev.
409, 439 (1996) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
903 FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF FREE SPEECH IN PUBLIC AIRPORTS, 55 J. Air L. &
Com. 1075, 1115+ (1990) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
904 THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND COLLEGE STUDENT NEWSPAPERS: APPLYING
HAZELWOOD TO COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, 33 J.C. & U.L. 245, 311 (2007)
905 THE CAMPUS AS AGORA: THE CONSTITUTION, COMMERCE, GADFLY STONECUTTERS,
AND IRREVERENT YOUTH, 31 J.C. & U.L. 513, 619+ (2005) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
906 BRISTER V. FAULKNER AND THE CLASH OF FREE SPEECH AND GOOD ORDER ON THE
COLLEGE CAMPUS, 28 J.C. & U.L. 467, 493+ (2002) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
907 ROSENBERGER v. RECTOR: THE FIRST AMENDMENT DOG CHASES ITS TAIL, 21 J.C. &
U.L. 723, 764 (1995) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
908 THE VAGUENESS OF PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION BANS: DECONSTRUCTION OR
DESTRUCTION?, 89 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1233, 1268+ (1999) HN: 2,3,9 (S.Ct.)
909 PROTECTING THE PRESIDENT FROM PROTEST: USING THE SECRET SERVICE'S ZONE
OF PROTECTION TO PROSECUTE PROTESTERS, 9 J. Gender Race & Just. 665, 688+ (2006)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
910 RELIGION IN NEW YORK PUBLIC SCHOOLS? GOD FORBID: PROPER APPLICATION OF
THE PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE, 12 J.L. & Pol'y 421, 484 (2003) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
911 BEAUTY AND THE WELL-DRAWN ORDINANCE: AVOIDING VAGUENESS AND
OVERBREADTH CHALLENGES TO MUNICIPAL AESTHETIC REGULATIONS, 6 J.L. & Pol'y
853, 913 (1998)
912 SERVICE BEFORE SELF? EVANGELICALS FLYING HIGH AT THE U.S. AIR FORCE
ACADEMY, 36 J.L. & Educ. 1, 31 (2007)
913 DESPITE THE BEST OF INTENTIONS: PROHIBITING PROTESTS AT MILITARY FUNERALS
AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 34 J. Legis. 54, 76 (2008)
914 ENGLISH ONLY?-THE "POWER" OF KENTUCKY'S OFFICIAL LANGUAGE STATUTE, 98
Ky. L.J. 855, 887 (2010)
915 CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM IN KENTUCKY: THE RACE FOR GOVERNOR, 85 Ky. L.J.
723, 765 (1997)
916 THE DIMENSIONS OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL EQUALITY, 55-WTR Law &
Contemp. Probs. 235, 251 (1992)
917 BONG HITS 4 JESUS AS A CAUTIONARY TALE OF TWO CITIES, 12 Lewis & Clark L. Rev.
61, 110 (2008)
918 MAINTAINING SAFETY AND CIVILITY IN PUBLIC SPACES: A CONSTITUTIONAL
APPROACH TO AGGRESSIVE BEGGING, 54 La. L. Rev. 285, 338 (1993) HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
919 DISENTANGLING THE LAW OF PUBLIC PROTEST, 45 Loy. L. Rev. 411, 526+ (1999) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
920 PROTEST, PROPORTIONALITY, AND THE POLITICS OF PRIVACY: MEDIATING THE

TENSION BETWEEN THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO ABORTION CLINICS AND FREE
RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES, 27 Loy. L.A. Int'l &
Comp. L. Rev. 1, 62+ (2005) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
921 WHY CALIFORNIA SHOPPING CENTERS CAN'T PROTECT MICKEY MOUSE FROM
UNION HANDBILLING: A COMMENT ON GLENDALE ASSOCIATES V. NLRB, 37 Loy. L.A.
L. Rev. 1799, 1830 (2004) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
922 CALIFORNIA'S ANTI-SLAPP LEGISLATION: A SUMMARY OF AND COMMENTARY ON ITS
OPERATION AND SCOPE, 33 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 801, 886+ (2000) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
923 CLOSING THE DOOR ON THE PUBLIC FORUM, 26 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 241, 265+ (1992) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
924 TURNER v. SAFLEY: THE SUPREME COURT FURTHER CONFUSES PRISONERS'
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 22 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 667, 715 (1989) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
925 WEBSITE ACCESS: THE CASE FOR CONSENT, 35 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 341, 387 (2003)
926 THE DEATH KNELL FOR HATE-CRIME LAWS? THE SUPREME COURT PROTECTS
UNPOPULAR SPEECH IN R.A.V. v. CITY OF ST. PAUL, 24 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 309, 341 (1993)
HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
927 CONANT v. WALTERS: A MISAPPLICATION OF FREE SPEECH RIGHTS IN THE DOCTORPATIENT RELATIONSHIP, 56 Me. L. Rev. 447, 467 (2004) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
928 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-SCHOOL BOARD'S EXCLUSIVE ACCESS POLICY TO TEACHER
MAILBOXES DOES NOT VIOLATE RIGHTS OF MINORITY UNION. PERRY EDUC. ASS'N v.
PERRY LOCAL EDUCATORS' ASS'N, 103 S.Ct. 948 (1983)., 67 Marq. L. Rev. 772, 784 (1984)
929 REWRITING NEAR V. MINNESOTA: CREATING A COMPLETE DEFINITION OF PRIOR
RESTRAINT, 52 Mercer L. Rev. 1087, 1145 (2001)
930 CLARK v. COMMUNITY FOR CREATIVE NON-VIOLENCE: THE DEMISE OF FIRSt
AMENDMENT PROTECTION FOR SYMBOLIC EXPRESSION?, 36 Mercer L. Rev. 1371, 1399+
(1985) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
931 THE KERR PRINCIPLE, STATE ACTION, AND LEGAL RIGHTS, 105 Mich. L. Rev. 1, 46 (2006)
932 UNTANGLING THE MARKET-PARTICIPANT EXEMPTION TO THE DORMANT
COMMERCE CLAUSE, 88 Mich. L. Rev. 395, 488+ (1989) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
933 DIFFERENCE MADE LEGAL: THE COURT AND DR. KING, 87 Mich. L. Rev. 2152, 2178+
(1989)
934 THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF ACCESS TO JUVENILE DELINQUENCY HEARINGS, 81 Mich. L.
Rev. 1540, 1565+ (1983)
935 DUE PROCESS AND EVICTION FROM PRIVATIZED MILITARY HOUSING-IS THE
COMMANDER KING?, 200 Mil. L. Rev. 108, 153+ (2009) HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
936 CROSSING THE LINE: RECONCILING THE RIGHT TO PICKET MILITARY FUNERALS
WITH THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 198 Mil. L. Rev. 67, 115+ (2008) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
937 OPEN HOUSES REVISITED: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH, 129 Mil. L. Rev. 185, 210 (1990)
938 COMMENT: GRIFFEN V. GRIFFISS AIR FORCE BASE: QUALIFIED IMMUNITY AND THE
COMMANDER'S LIABILITY FOR OPEN HOUSES ON MILITARY BASES, 117 Mil. L. Rev.
279, 299+ (1987) HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
939 THE CALL FOR CAMPUS CONDUCT POLICIES: CENSORSHIP OR CONSTITUTIONALLY
PERMISSIBLE LIMITATIONS ON SPEECH, 75 Minn. L. Rev. 201, 238 (1990)
940 REFLECTIONS ON CONTEXT AND THE CONSTITUTION, 73 Minn. L. Rev. 73, 84 (1988) HN:
10 (S.Ct.)
941 EDUCATION OR INDOCTRINATION-REMOVAL OF BOOKS FROM PUBLIC SCHOOL

LIBRARIES: BOARD OF EDUCATION, ISLAND TREES UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT
NO. 26 v. PICO, 68 Minn. L. Rev. 213, 253 (1983)
942 TOLLING THE FINAL BELL: WILL PUBLIC SCHOOL DOORS REMAIN OPEN TO THE
FIRST AMENDMENT?, 14 Miss. C. L. Rev. 55, 76+ (1993) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
943 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-FIRST AMENDMENT-PUBLIC BROADCASTERS MAY EXCLUDE
POLITICAL CANDIDATES FROM DEBATES AS LONG AS EXCLUSION IS REASONABLE
AND VIEWPOINT-NEUTRAL, 68 Miss. L.J. 391, 391 (1998) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
944 COPYRIGHT NONCONSEQUENTIALISM, 69 Mo. L. Rev. 1, 72 (2004)
945 INTRODUCTION: THE DIFFICULT FIRST AMENDMENT, 66 Mo. L. Rev. 1, 8 (2001) HN: 12
(S.Ct.)
946 STRIPPING AWAY FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION, 57 Mo. L. Rev. 629, 660+ (1992)
947 THE PRESS CLAUSE CONSTRUED IN CONTEXT: THE JOURNALISTS' RIGHT OF ACCESS
TO PLACES, 52 Mo. L. Rev. 751, 776+ (1987) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
948 IN TWO CASES, COURT OKS SPEECH LIMITS THE "FORBES' AND "NEA' DECISIONS
APPROVE GREATER GOVERNMENTAL CONTROL OVER FORMS OF SPEECH., 8/10/98
Nat'l L.J. B15, col. 1, B15, col. 1 (1998)
949 THE EMERGING DICHOTOMY OF THE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION: EXPRESSION AND
AUTHORITY IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS UNDER MORSE V. FREDERICK, 127 S. CT. 2618 (2007),
88 Neb. L. Rev. 180, 203 (2009) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
950 1 Nev. L.J. 207, WHEN PRIVATE PROPERTY BECOMES A PUBLIC FORUM (2001) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
951 "STARS IN THE CONSTELLATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH": MASSACHUSETTS
TOWNS AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF INSTRUCTION, 29 New Eng. L. Rev. 285,
309 (1995)
952 USING CIVIL RICO TO BATTLE ANTI-ABORTION VIOLENCE: IS THE LAST WEAPON IN
THE ARSENAL A SWORD OF DAMOCLES?, 25 New Eng. L. Rev. 1363, 1414 (1991)
953 BALANCING FREE SPEECH IN A PUBLIC FORUM vs. RESIDENTIAL PRIVACY: FRISBY v.
SCHULTZ, 24 New Eng. L. Rev. 889, 915+ (1990)
954 159 New Jersey Law Journal 440, NIXON ET AL V. SHRINK MISSOURI GOVERNMENT PAC
ET AL, NO. 98-963 STATE LIMITS ON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS ARE AUTHORIZED
BY BUCKLEY V. VALEO DOCTRINE (2000)
955 153 New Jersey Law Journal 735, ON SPEECH ISSUES, COURT SPEAKS IN MANY TONGUES
ONE MESSAGE LOUD AND CLEAR: FIRST AMENDMENT A WORK IN PROGRESS (1998)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
956 CITIZEN GUN RIGHTS: INCORPORATING THE SECOND AMENDMENT THROUGH THE
PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES CLAUSE, 39 N.M. L. Rev. 195, 260 (2009) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
957 PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE AND THE PERILS OF CATEGORICAL THINKING: LESSONS
FROM LAMB'S CHAPEL, 24 N.M. L. Rev. 1, 26+ (1994) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
958 Kings County Criminal Court Information Charging Defendant With Trespass In Police Precinct
Found Facially Sufficient, 12/9/2008 N.Y. L.J. 29, col. 1, 29, col. 1 (2008)
959 NASSAU COUNTY DISTRICT COURT Ordinance Found Unconstitutionally Vague as Applied to
Defendant for Distributing Religious Leaflets, 4/13/2007 N.Y. L.J. 23, col. 3, 23, col. 3 (2007)
960 Second Circuit DECISION OF THE DAY U.S. Court of Appeals Huminski, plaintiff-appellantcross-appellee v. Corsones, defendants-appellees-cross-appellants Decided October 7, 2004 Before
McLaughlin, Cabranes, and Sack, C.JJ, 11/9/2004 N.Y. L.J. 18, col. 1, 18, col. 1 (2004) HN: 10
(S.Ct.)
961 DECISION OF INTEREST HOTEL EMPLOYEES & RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES UNION V.

CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION Second Circuit, 11/22/2002
N.Y. L.J. 30, col. 2, 30, col. 2 (2002)
962 PEOPLE V. SAU CHAN QDS:22900080, 9/13/2000 N.Y. L.J. 23, col. 6, 23, col. 6 (2000) HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
963 PEOPLE V. AMY BETH, 11/8/95 N.Y. L.J. 28, col. 1, 28, col. 1 (1995) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
964 PATEL V. NEW YORK CITY ART COMMISSION, 5/11/94 N.Y. L.J. 31, col. 6, 31, col. 6+ (1994)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
965 PEOPLE, V. LUIS RODRIGUEZ, 1/13/94 N.Y. L.J. 26, col. 6, 26, col. 6+ (1994) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
966 PEOPLE v. JOHN GRAY, JOHN KAEHNY, CHARLES KOMANOFF, STEPHEN KRETZMANN,
JONATHAN ORCUTT AND ANN SULLIVAN, 3/25/91 N.Y. L.J. 26, col. 3, 26, col. 3 (1991)
967 PEOPLE v. JOHN PENNISI AND MICHAEL LIQUORI, 12/11/90 N.Y. L.J. 25, col. 5, 25, col. 5+
(1990)
968 PEOPLE, PLF-RES, v. JAMES O'GRADY, JAMES MORGAN AND DIANA YATES, 8/7/90 N.Y.
L.J. 19, col. 6, 19, col. 6 (1990)
969 SOCIAL SERVICES LAW POLITICAL SPEECH AT HOMELESS SHELTERS IN THE MATTER
OF NORMAN GOLD-GREENBERGER, RESPONDENT, V. HUMAN RESOURCES
ADMINISTRATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
DECIDED MARCH 2, 1, 3/13/90 N.Y. L.J. 21, col. 3, 21, col. 3+ (1990) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
970 THE VIDEO REVOLUTION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: DEMOCRATIZATION OF
MEDIA PRODUCTION AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE FUTURE "ELECTRONIC PUBLIC
FORUM", 8 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Hum. Rts. 257, 287+ (1990)
971 CORPORATE PHILANTHROPY AND CAMPAIGN FINANCE: EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS AS
CORPORATE-CANDIDATE CONDUITS, 41 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 881, 943 (1997)
972 IN BED WITH THE MILITARY: FIRST AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS OF EMBEDDED
JOURNALISM, 80 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1309, 1343 (2005) HN: 7 (S.Ct.)
973 A NONPUBLIC FORUM OR A BRUTAL BUREAUCRACY? ADVOCATES' CLAIMS OF
ACCESS TO WELFARE CENTER WAITING ROOMS, 75 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1004, 1044+ (2000)
HN: 9,10,12 (S.Ct.)
974 THE BOLD AND THE BEAUTIFUL: ART, PUBLIC SPACES, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT,
72 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 383, 429 (1997)
975 DISCUSSION AND DECISIONS: A PROPOSAL TO REPLACE THE MYTH OF SELF-RULE
WITH AN ATTORNEYSHIP MODEL OF REPRESENTATION, 69 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 477, 562 (1994)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
976 REVIVING TRESPASS-BASED SEARCH ANALYSIS UNDER THE OPEN VIEW DOCTRINE:
DOW CHEMICAL CO. v. UNITED STATES, 63 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 191, 228 (1988) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
977 THE FORMAL STATE ACTION DOCTRINE AND FREE SPEECH ANALYSIS, 83 N.C. L. Rev.
569, 619 (2005) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
978 ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION COMMISSION V. FORBES: INDEPENDENT
CANDIDATE ACCESS TO PUBLIC TELEVISION DEBATES, 77 N.C. L. Rev. 1223, 1265+
(1999) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
979 DISTINCTION WITHOUT A DIFFERENCE: A REAPPRAISAL OF THE DOCTRINE OF PRIOR
RESTRAINT, 68 N.C. L. Rev. 1, 35 (1989) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
980 THE SEPARATE COMMUNITY: MILITARY UNIQUENESS AND SERVICEMEN'S
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 62 N.C. L. Rev. 177, 254 (1984) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
981 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-FIRST AMENDMENT-FREEDOM OF SPEECH: THE NATIONAL
ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS CAN REQUIRE CONSIDERATION OF "DECENCY AND

RESPECT" IN FUNDING DECISIONS WITHOUT ABRIDGING FREEDOM OF SPEECH, 75
N.D. L. Rev. 893, 920 (1999) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
982 INJUSTICE IN OUR SCHOOLS: STUDENTS' FREE SPEECH RIGHTS ARE NOT BEING
VIGILANTLY PROTECTED, 21 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 265, 318 (2001) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
983 FRYE v. KANSAS CITY MISSOURI POLICE DEPARTMENT: WHEN PUBLIC SAFETY
ISSUES CLASH WITH THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, 32 N. Ky. L. Rev. 327, 349+ (2005) HN:
11,12 (S.Ct.)
984 DETERS v. JUDICIAL RETIREMENT AND REMOVAL COMMISSION: FREE SPEECH AND
THE APPEARANCE OF JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY, 22 N. Ky. L. Rev. 497, 540 (1995) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
985 LOPER V. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT: A FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO
BEG?, 22 N. Ky. L. Rev. 853, 871 (1995) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
986 UNITED STATES v. KOKINDA: REDEFINING PUBLIC FORA?, 19 N. Ky. L. Rev. 149, 169+
(1991) HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
987 MEESE v. KEENE-CONGRESS CAN SIDE-STEP THE FIRST AMENDMENT BY INDIRECT
LEGISLATION, 15 N. Ky. L. Rev. 181, 204 (1988)
988 THE CASE FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL EASEMENT APPROACH TO PERMANENT
MONUMENTS IN TRADITIONAL PUBLIC FORUMS, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 185, 198
(2008) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
989 NO, WE'RE NOT THERE YET: A PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE APPROACH TO VIDEO
ENTERTAINMENT SCREENS IN CARS, 100 Nw. U. L. Rev. 999, 1036 (2006) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
990 "OBJECTIVE" APPROACHES TO THE PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE: THE FIRST
AMENDMENT AT THE MERCY OF ARCHITECTURAL CHICANERY, 90 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1185,
1253+ (1996) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
991 EQUAL ACCESS AND MOMENTS OF SILENCE: THE EQUAL STATUS OF RELIGIOUS
SPEECH BY PRIVATE SPEAKERS, 81 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1, 67 (1986) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
992 JUSTICE BRENNAN, JUSTICE REHNQUIST, AND FREE SPEECH, 80 Nw. U. L. Rev. 285, 320
(1985)
993 THE WARREN COURT, THE BURGER COURT AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT
OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE, 78 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1031, 1059+ (1983) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
994 CRIMINAL COERCION AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH, 78 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1081, 1124 (1983)
995 UNREASONED REASONABLENESS: MANDATORY PARADE PERMITS AND TIME, PLACE,
AND MANNER REGULATIONS, 78 Nw. U. L. Rev. 937, 1024+ (1983) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
996 VOICE IN GOVERNMENT: THE PEOPLE, 8 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 427, 466+
(1994) HN: 1,9 (S.Ct.)
997 TRESPASS-ZONING: ENSURING NEIGHBORHOODS A SAFER FUTURE BY EXCLUDING
THOSE WITH A CRIMINAL PAST, 79 Notre Dame L. Rev. 327, 387 (2003) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
998 AUTHORS, EDITORS, AND UNCOMMON CARRIERS: IDENTIFYING THE "SPEAKER"
WITHIN THE NEW MEDIA, 71 Notre Dame L. Rev. 79, 125 (1995) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
999 "MOTHER OF MERCY-IS THIS THE END OF RICO?''-JUSTICE SCALIA INVITES
CONSTITUTIONAL VOID-FOR-VAGUENESS CHALLENGE TO RICO "PATTERN"', 65 Notre
Dame L. Rev. 1106, 1164 (1990) HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1000 THE SEARCH FOR VALID GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS: A REVIEW OF THE
JUDICIAL RESPONSE TO MUNICIPAL POLICIES REGARDING FIRST AMENDMENT
ACTIVITIES, 63 Notre Dame L. Rev. 561, 569+ (1988) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1001 THE ONGOING MYSTERY OF THE LIMITED PUBLIC FORUM, 33 Nova L. Rev. 299, 299+
(2009) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1002 THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND NATIONAL SECURITY: THE COURT RESPONDS TO
GOVERNMENTAL HARASSMENT OF ALLEGED COMMUNIST SYMPATHIZERS, 19 Ohio
N.U. L. Rev. 885, 926 (1993) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1003 REOPENING THE PUBLIC FORUM-FROM SIDEWALKS TO CYBERSPACE, 58 Ohio St. L.J.
1535, 1634+ (1998) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1004 APPLYING PENALTY ENHANCEMENTS TO CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE: CLARIFYING THE
FREE SPEECH CLAUSE MODEL TO BRING THE SOCIAL VALUE OF POLITICAL PROTEST
INTO THE BALANCE, 59 Ohio St. L.J. 185, 258+ (1998) HN: 9,10,11 (S.Ct.)
1005 AFFIRMATION OF THE OPEN FIELDS DOCTRINE: THE OLIVER TWIST, 46 Ohio St. L.J.
729, 753+ (1985) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1006 BALANCING FREEDOM OF SPEECH WITH THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY: HOW TO LEGALLY
COPE WITH THE FUNERAL PROTEST PROBLEM, 28 Pace L. Rev. 101, 127+ (2007) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
1007 YOUNG v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY: SILENCING THE BEGGARS IN THE
SUBWAYS, 12 Pace L. Rev. 359, 401 (1992)
1008 WARD v. ROCK AGAINST RACISM: REASONABLE REGULATIONS AND STATE
SPONSORED SOUND, 10 Pace L. Rev. 633, 659 (1990) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1009 BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS v. JEWS FOR JESUS, INC.: A MISSED
OPPORTUNITY TO RESTORE FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS TO PUBLIC FORUM ANALYSIS,
8 Pace L. Rev. 607, 616+ (1988) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
1010 CABLE TELEVISION: LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION IN PERSPECTIVE, 7 Pace L.
Rev. 81, 126 (1986) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1011 FREE SPEECH IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY: TEN LESSONS FROM THE TWENTIETH
CENTURY, 36 Pepp. L. Rev. 273, 299+ (2009) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1012 PROTECTED PETITIONING OR UNLAWFUL RETALIATION? THE LIMITS OF FIRST
AMENDMENT IMMUNITY FOR LAWSUITS UNDER THE FAIR HOUSING ACT, 27 Pepp. L.
Rev. 477, 519+ (2000)
1013 JOURNALISTS, TRESPASS, AND OFFICIALS: CLOSING THE DOOR ON FLORIDA
PUBLISHING CO. v. FLETCHER, 16 Pepp. L. Rev. 259, 295+ (1989) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1014 THE CONNECTICUT CONSTITUTION AND THE PUBLIC FORUM ANALYSIS, 14 QLR 105,
141+ (1994) HN: 9,12 (S.Ct.)
1015 WHITHER THE PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE: HAS THIS CREATURE OF THE COURTS
OUTLIVED ITS USEFULNESS?, 44 Real Prop. Tr. & Est. L.J. 637, 707+ (2010) HN: 7,9,10
(S.Ct.)
1016 "DON'T SHOOT THE MESSENGER!" FIRST AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS OF THE
ANIMAL ENTERPRISE TERRORISM ACT, 42 Rev. Juridica U. Inter. P.R. 407, 424 (2008)
1017 SILENCING THE BLOGOSPHERE: A FIRST AMENDMENT CAUTION TO LEGISLATORS
CONSIDERING USING BLOGS TO COMMUNICATE DIRECTLY WITH CONSTITUENTS, 13
Rich. J.L. & Tech. 15, 146+ (2007) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1018 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STUDENT FEES FOR POLITICAL STUDENT GROUPS IN
THE CAMPUS PUBLIC FORUM: GALDA v. BLOUSTEIN AND THE RIGHT TO ASSOCIATE,
15 Rutgers L.J. 135, 184 (1983)
1019 I'LL SPEAK FOR MYSELF: COMPULSORY SPEECH AND THE USE OF STUDENT FEES AT
STATE UNIVERSITIES, 52 Rutgers L. Rev. 341, 381 (1999)
1020 JUDGING WITHOUT JUDGMENT: CONSTITUTIONAL IRRELEVANCIES AND THE DEMISE
OF DIALOGUE, 46 Rutgers L. Rev. 1473, 1690 (1994) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)

1021 WHY KREIMER CAN'T READ: STRIKING THE PROPER BALANCE BETWEEN LIBRARY
ACCESS AND PROBLEM PATRONS IN KREIMER V. BUREAU OF POLICE, 46 Rutgers L. Rev.
1845, 1888 (1994) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1022 CITY OF LADUE V. GILLEO: CONTENT DISCRIMINATION AND THE RIGHT TO
PARTICIPATE IN PUBLIC DEBATE, 14 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 349, 398 (1995)
1023 ABORTION CLINIC PROTEST AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 13 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev.
221, 252 (1993) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1024 BASIC FREE SPEECH ANALYSIS, 31 Santa Clara L. Rev. 883, 987 (1991) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1025 THE "WATCHMAN FOR TRUTH": PROFESSIONAL LICENSING AND THE FIRST
AMENDMENT, 23 Seattle U. L. Rev. 885, 976 (2000) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1026 A CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CASEBOOK FOR THE 21ST CENTURY: A CRITICAL ESSAY ON
COHEN AND VARAT Constitutional Law, Cases and Materials. By William Cohen and Jonathan D.
Varat. Westbury, New York: Foundation Press, 1997. Pp. v,, 21 Seattle U. L. Rev. 859, 884 (1998)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1027 BRIDGING THE ANALOGY GAP: THE INTERNET, THE PRINTING PRESS AND FREEDOM
OF SPEECH, 20 Seattle U. L. Rev. 711, 748 (1997) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1028 FIRST AMENDMENT -GOVERNMENT-OWNED BROADCASTERS RETAIN THE RIGHT TO
CONTROL POLITICAL CANDIDATES' FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT OF ACCESS TO
SPONSORED DEBATES-ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION COMMISSION V.
FORBES, 523 U.S. 666 (19, 10 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 493, 542+ (2000) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1029 BROTHER, CAN YOU SPARE A DIME?: THE PANHANDLER'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT
TO BEG, 5 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 681, 722 (1995) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1030 FIRST AMENDMENT--FREEDOM OF SPEECH--BECAUSE AIRPORT TERMINALS
CONSTITUTE NONPUBLIC FORA, A BAN ON SOLICITATION IS REASONABLE, WHILE A
BAN ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF LITERATURE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL-INTERNATIONAL SOC'Y FOR KRI, 3 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 571, 606+ (1993) HN: 9,10,12
(S.Ct.)
1031 FIRST AMENDMENT-FREE SPEECH-MUNICIPAL NOISE ORDINANCE IMPOSING
MANDATORY ADHERENCE TO SOUND AMPLIFICATION GUIDELINES CONSTITUTES A
VALID TIME, PLACE, OR MANNER RESTRICTION ON PROTECTED SPEECH-WARD v.
ROCK AGAINST RACISM,, 1 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 451, 485+ (1991)
1032 THE DOCTRINE OF DEFERENCE: SHIFTING CONSTITUTIONAL PRESUMPTIONS AND
THE SUPREME COURT'S RESTATEMENT OF STUDENT RIGHTS AFTER BOARD OF
EDUCATION V. EARLS, 56 S.C. L. Rev. 1, 92 (2004) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1033 WHAT TO DO WHEN FACED WITH A NOVEL STATE ACTION QUESTION? PUNT: THE
EIGHTH CIRCUIT'S DECISION IN REINHART V. CITY OF BROOKINGS, 42 S.D. L. Rev. 508,
536+ (1997)
1034 THE MODERN FIRST AMENDMENT AND COPYRIGHT LAW, 18 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 547,
588 (2009) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1035 HECKLING: A PROTECTED RIGHT OR DISORDERLY CONDUCT?, 60 S. Cal. L. Rev. 215,
237+ (1986) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1036 POLITICAL BOYCOTTS, THE SHERMAN ACT, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: AN
ACCOMODATION OF COMPETING INTERESTS, 55 S. Cal. L. Rev. 983, 1030 (1982)
1037 PUBLICLY AS AN ASPECT OF PRIVACY AND PERSONAL AUTONOMY, 55 S. Cal. L. Rev.
727, 768 (1982)
1038 FEMINIST JURISPRUDENCE AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: HEARING ANOTHER VOICE,
7 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women's Stud. 269, 298 (1998)

1039 REGAINING LOST GROUND: TOWARD A PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE UNDER THE
ILLINOIS CONSTITUTION, 18 S. Ill. U. L.J. 453, 480+ (1994) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1040 FREE SPEECH WARS, 48 SMU L. Rev. 203, 214 (1994) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1041 LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES: A REGULATORY WASTELAND, 37 Sw. L.J. 1099, 1178
(1984)
1042 A FIRST AMENDMENT COMPASS: NAVIGATING THE SPEECH CLAUSE WITH A FIVESTEP ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK, 29 Sw. U. L. Rev. 223, 300+ (2000) HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1043 SHOULD HATE SPEECH BE PROHIBITED IN LAW SCHOOLS?, 20 Sw. U. L. Rev. 145, 173
(1991) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1044 NETWORK "EARLY CALLS" OF ELECTIONS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEGALITY OF
PROPOSALS TO KEEP THE VOTING PROCESS FROM BECOMING AN ACADEMIC
EXERCISE, 14 Sw. U. L. Rev. 428, 476 (1984)
1045 THE DAVIS CASE AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 11 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 39, 61+
(1995) HN: 1,7,9 (S.Ct.)
1046 A RESURGENCE OF CENSORSHIP IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY?: THE NINTH
CIRCUIT'S RESPONSE IN PLANNED PARENTHOOD v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL
DISTRICT, 7 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 681, 706 (1992)
1047 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS, INC. v. LEE: PUBLIC
FORUM ANALYSIS OF AIRPORT RESTRICTIONS ON SPEECH, 6 St. John's J. Legal Comment.
333, 355+ (1991)
1048 DOES ANYBODY REALLY NEED A LIMITED PUBLIC FORUM?, 82 St. John's L. Rev. 107,
151+ (2008) HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1049 NEW WINE, NEW BOTTLES: PRIVATE PROPERTY METAPHORS AND PUBLIC FORUM
SPEECH, 71 St. John's L. Rev. 217, 328+ (1997) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1050 SHOULD IRISH EYES BE SMILING? THE HIDDEN ISSUE OF STATE ACTION IN HURLEY v.
IRISH-AMERICAN GAY, LESBIAN AND BISEXUAL GROUP OF BOSTON, 70 St. John's L.
Rev. 313, 336 (1996)
1051 THE PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE IN SCHOOLS, 69 St. John's L. Rev. 529, 537 (1995) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
1052 THE SUPREME COURT AND FREE SPEECH: LOVE AND A QUESTION, 42 St. Louis U. L.J.
789, 811 (1998) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1053 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS, INC. v. LEE: THE FAILURE
OF THE PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE TO PROTECT FREE SPEECH, 37 St. Louis U. L.J. 437,
464+ (1993) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
1054 SPAM (SUPREMACY CLAUSE, PUBLIC FORUMS, AND MAILINGS): THE FIFTH CIRCUIT'S
INTERPRETATION OF THE CAN-SPAM ACT IN WHITE BUFFALO V. UNIVERSITY OF
TEXAS, 38 St. Mary's L.J. 553, 589 (2007) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1055 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-FIRST AMENDMENT-SCHOOL OFFICIALS ENTITLED TO
REGULATE CONTENTS OF SCHOOL SPONSORED NEWSPAPER IN REASONABLE
MANNER. HAZELWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT v. KUHLMEIER, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S. Ct. 562,
98 L. Ed. 2d 592, 19 St. Mary's L.J. 1133, 1135 (1988) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1056 INDECENCY ON CABLE TELEVISION-A BARREN BATTLEGROUND FOR REGULATION
OF PROGRAMMING CONTENT, 15 St. Mary's L.J. 417, 441 (1984) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1057 A SIGN OF THE TIMES: BILLBOARD REGULATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 15 St.
Mary's L.J. 635, 662 (1984)
1058 UNION SOLICITATION IN THE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY: GUIDELINES FOR THE LABOR
LAWPRACTITIONER, 15 St. Mary's L.J. 123, 151 (1983)
1059 UNLEASHING THE LIMITED PUBLIC FORUM: A MODEST REVISION TO A
DYSFUNCTIONAL DOCTRINE, 52 Stan. L. Rev. 929, 957+ (2000) HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1060 ASSESSING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PRESS RESTRICTIONS IN THE PERSIAN
GULF WAR, 44 Stan. L. Rev. 675, 726 (1992)
1061 BLYEW: VARIATIONS ON A JURISDICTIONAL THEME, 41 Stan. L. Rev. 469, 566 (1989) HN:
11 (S.Ct.)
1062 THE MISAPPLICATION OF THE NOERR-PENNINGTON DOCTRINE IN NON-ANTITRUST
RIGHT TO PETITION CASES, 36 Stan. L. Rev. 1243, 1272+ (1984) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1063 A UNITARY APPROACH TO CLAIMS OF FIRST AMENDMENT ACCESS TO PUBLICLY
OWNED PROPERTY, 35 Stan. L. Rev. 121, 152+ (1982) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
1064 POLICING THE PROFESSIONAL MONOPOLY: A CONSTITUTIONAL AND EMPIRICAL
ANALYSIS OF UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE PROHIBITIONS, 34 Stan. L. Rev. 1, 99 (1981)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1065 THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND POLITICAL SPEECH: AN INQUIRY INTO THE SUBSTANCE
AND LIMITS OF PRINCIPLE, 30 Stan. L. Rev. 299, 358+ (1978)
1066 THE PUBLIC FORUM: MINIMUM ACCESS, EQUAL ACCESS, AND THE FIRST
AMENDMENT, 28 Stan. L. Rev. 117, 130+ (1975) HN: 4,7,9 (S.Ct.)
1067 THE CONSCIENTIOUS LEGISLATOR'S GUIDE TO CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION,
27 Stan. L. Rev. 585, 601 (1975)
1068 VAGUENESS DOCTRINE IN THE FEDERAL COURTS: A FOCUS ON THE MILITARY,
PRISON, AND CAMPUS CONTEXTS, 26 Stan. L. Rev. 855, 890 (1974)
1069 LAWYERS BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT: CIVIL LIBERTIES AND CIVIL RIGHTS, 195766, 22 Stan. L. Rev. 487, 509 (1970)
1070 THE GENERAL-ELECTION BALLOT: MORE NOMINEES OR MORE REPRESENTATIVE
NOMINEES?, 22 Stan. L. Rev. 165, 177+ (1970) HN: 9,11 (S.Ct.)
1071 POLICE DOSSIERS AND EMERGING PRINCIPLES OF FIRST AMENDMENT
ADJUDICATION, 22 Stan. L. Rev. 196, 220 (1970)
1072 LITTER OR LITERATURE: DOES THE FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECT LITTERING OF
NEIGHBORHOODS?, 26 Stetson L. Rev. 837, 859 (1997)
1073 THE IMPOSITION OF STRICT CIVIL LIABILITY ON A MEDIA DEFENDANT FOR
PUBLICATION OF TRUTHFUL, LAWFULLY OBTAINED INFORMATION FLORIDA STAR,
INC. v. B.F.J., 499 So.2d 883 (FLA. 1ST DCA 1986)., 18 Stetson L. Rev. 119, 146 (1988)
1074 PUZZLING LOGIC: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF CONGRESS'S "LOGIC PUZZLE" EMAIL FILTERS, 41 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 933, 956+ (2008) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1075 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-MTBA'S REFUSAL TO DISPLAY CONDOM ADVERTISING
CREATES APPEARANCE OF VIEWPOINT DISCRIMINATION-AIDS ACTION COMMITTEE
O MASSACHUSETTS, INC. v. MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, 42
F.3D 1 (1ST CIR, 29 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 861, 869 (1995)
1076 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-A NEW LEVEL OF MEANS-END SCRUTINY APPLIED TO
CONTENT-NEUTRAL INJUNCTIONS THAT LIMIT PROTECTED SPEECH-MADSEN V.
WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER, INC., 114 S. CT. 2516 (1994), 29 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 1189, 1198
(1995)
1077 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW -NO FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION FOR SOLICITATION OF
MONEY IN PUBLICLY-OPERATED AIRPORT TERMINAL- INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR
KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS, INC. V. LEE, 112 S. CT. 2701 (1992), 27 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 941,
950 (1993) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)

1078 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--SOLICITATION ON GOVERNMENT PROPERTY LESS
PROTECTED THAN OTHER FORMS OF EXPRESSION: INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS LOSE
AGAIN--UNITED STATES v. KOKINDA, 110 S. CT. 3115 (1990), 25 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 772, 780
(1991)
1079 THE GREAT CIVIL RIGHTS CASE OF HAGUE v. CIO: NOTES OF A SURVIVOR, 25 Suffolk U.
L. Rev. 913, 947 (1991)
1080 Now v. Scheidler: Rico Meets the First Amendment, 1994 Sup. Ct. Rev. 129, 168+ (1994)
1081 WHO WANTS TO GIVE A MILLION DOLLARS? AN ANALYSIS OF SHRINK MISSOURI
GOVERNMENT PAC AND THE ISSUE OF CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM, 51 Syracuse L.
Rev. 919, 940+ (2001) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1082 THE BABY AND THE BATHWATER TOO: A CRITIQUE OF AMERICAN LIBRARY ASS'N v.
U.S., 12 Syracuse Sci. & Tech. L. Rep. 35, 35+ (2005) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1083 THE SOMETIMES relEVANT FIRST AMENDMENT, 60 Temp. L.Q. 881, 899 (1987)
1084 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-STATE MAY BAN RELIGIOUS SOLICITATION IN PUBLIC
SPORTS COMPLEX, SINCE COMPLEX IS NOT A PUBLIC FORUM-INTERNATIONAL
SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS, INC. v. NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXPOSITION
AUTHORITY, 691, 57 Temp. L.Q. 119, 133+ (1983) HN: 4,7,9 (S.Ct.)
1085 ANTITRUST, THE FIRST AMENDMENT, AND THE COMMUNICATION OF PRICE
INFORMATION, 56 Temp. L.Q. 939, 982 (1983)
1086 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-THE SUPREME COURT'S MISAPPLICATION OF PUBLIC FORUM
DOCTRINE CREATES GOVERNMENTAL VETO OF POLITICAL SPEECH BY BALLOTQUALIFIED CANDIDATES -ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION COMMISSION V.
FORBES, 523 U.S., 73 Temp. L. Rev. 331, 377+ (2000) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
1087 THE CAGING OF FREE SPEECH IN AMERICA, 14 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 455, 493
(2005) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1088 POLITICAL DEBATES: "FORUM" OVER SUBSTANCE IN ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL
TELEVISION COMMISSION V. FORBES, 9 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 159, 188+ (1999) HN:
9 (S.Ct.)
1089 WHEN CIVIL RIGHTS GO WRONG: AGENDA AND PROCESS IN CIVIL RIGHTS REFORM, 2
Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 177, 208 (1993)
1090 SPEECH AND SPATIAL TACTICS, 84 Tex. L. Rev. 581, 651 (2006)
1091 DISTRIBUTIVE VALUES IN COPYRIGHT, 83 Tex. L. Rev. 1535, 1579+ (2005)
1092 RITUALS, RIOTS, RULES, AND RIGHTS: THE ASTOR PLACE THEATER RIOT OF 1849 AND
THE EVOLVING LIMITS OF FREE SPEECH, 81 Tex. L. Rev. 679, 713+ (2002) HN: 7,9,11
(S.Ct.)
1093 STEPPING INTO THE SAME RIVER TWICE: RAPIDLY CHANGING FACTS AND THE
APPELLATE PROCESS, 78 Tex. L. Rev. 269, 373 (1999) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1094 "POST" LIBERALISM Constitutional Domains: Democracy, Community, Management. By Robert
C. Post. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995. Pp. ix, 463. $45.00., 74 Tex. L. Rev. 1059,
1085 (1996) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1095 REDISCOVERING THE COMMUNAL WORTH OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS: THE FIRST
AMENDMENT IN INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXTS, 69 Tex. L. Rev. 1, 108 (1990) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1096 FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND THE SILENCE OF THE LAW FREE SPEECH: A
PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY. BY FREDERICK SCHAUER. CAMBRIDGE: UNIVERSITY OF
CAMBRIDGE PRESS, 1982. Pp. xiv, 237. $34.50/$9.95., 64 Tex. L. Rev. 443, 467 (1985)
1097 A RECONSIDERATION OF COX v. NEW HAMPSHIRE: CAN DEMONSTRATORS BE
REQUIRED TO PAY THE COSTS OF USING AMERICA'S PUBLIC FORUMS?, 62 Tex. L. Rev.
403, 451 (1983) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1098 PRESS ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT-CONTROLLED INFORMATION AND THE
ALTERNATIVE MEANS TEST, 59 Tex. L. Rev. 1279, 1301 (1981)
1099 WHEN GOVERNMENTS SPEAK: TOWARD A THEORY OF GOVERNMENT EXPRESSION
AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 57 Tex. L. Rev. 863, 918 (1979)
1100 THE PUBLIC SCHOOL AS PUBLIC FORUM, 54 Tex. L. Rev. 90, 97+ (1975) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1101 NEWSGATHERING: SECOND-CLASS RIGHT AMONG FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOMS, 53
Tex. L. Rev. 1440, 1482 (1975)
1102 THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND THE STATE AS EDITOR: IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC
BROADCASTING, 52 Tex. L. Rev. 1123, 1165 (1974)
1103 JUSTICE BLACK AND HIS CRITICS ON SPEECH-PLUS AND SYMBOLIC SPEECH, 52 Tex.
L. Rev. 257, 260+ (1974) HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1104 CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE: THE LIMITS OF LEGALISM, 52 Tex. L. Rev.
285, 301+ (1974)
1105 A REQUIEM FOR THE WARREN COURT, 48 Tex. L. Rev. 608, 623 (1970)
1106 SENTENCING, PROBATION, AND THE REHABILITATIVE IDEAL: THE VIEW FROM
MEMPA V. RHAY, 47 Tex. L. Rev. 1, 47 (1968)
1107 TELEVISION SERVICE AND THE FCC IV. Regulating Programming and Program Content, 46
Tex. L. Rev. 1171, 1193 (1968) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1108 CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN AMERICA, 46 Tex. L. Rev. 742, 749+ (1968) HN: 4,11 (S.Ct.)
1109 REVIVING A FIRST AMENDMENT ABSOLUTISM FOR THE INTERNET, 3 Tex. Rev. L. & Pol.
279, 322+ (1999) HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1110 FIRST AMENDMENT, 39 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 763, 805+ (2007) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1111 "CONTEXT MATTERS": THE FREE SPEECH LEGACY OF SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR, 16
Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 323, 367+ (2010)
1112 CONGRESS AND THE COURTS BATTLE OVER THE FIRST AMENDMENT: CAN THE LAW
REALLY PROTECT CHILDREN FROM PORNOGRAPHY ON THE INTERNET?, 21 J. Marshall
J. Computer & Info. L. 141, 205 (2003)
1113 REVISITING BUCKLEY v. VALEO: EVISCERATING THE LINE BETWEEN CANDIDATE
CONTRIBUTIONS AND INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES, 14 J.L. & Pol. 33, 107 (1998)
1114 UNITED STATES v. O'BRIEN REVISITED: OF BURNING THINGS, WAVING THINGS, AND
G-STRINGS, 36 U. Mem. L. Rev. 903, 939+ (2006) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1115 DEFENDING THE FREEDOM TO BE HEARD: WHERE ALTERNATE AVENUES INTERSECT
EMPTY PUBLIC SPACES, 36 U. Mem. L. Rev. 277, 299+ (2006) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
1116 THE UNEASY COEXISTENCE OF EQUAL PROTECTION AND FREE SPEECH CLAIMS IN
THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT CONTEXT, 31 U. Mem. L. Rev. 559, 610 (2001)
1117 MADSEN v. WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER, INC.: RIGHT-WINGED ANTI-ABORTIONIST,
CAN THEY BE STOPPED?, 20 T. Marshall L. Rev. 349, 383 (1995) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1118 DAZED AND CONFUSED: EXPLAINING JUDICIAL DETERMINATIONS OF TRADITIONAL
PUBLIC FORUM STATUS, 82 Tul. L. Rev. 929, 972 (2008)
1119 COMMON GROUND: ROBERT JACKSON, ANTONIN SCALIA, AND A POWER THEORY OF
THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 75 Tul. L. Rev. 251, 336 (2000) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1120 MANIPULATING LEGISLATIVE FACTS: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE FIRST
AMENDMENT, 72 Tul. L. Rev. 1261, 1320 (1998)
1121 BEYOND ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE ANALYSIS IN PUBLIC SCHOOL SITUATIONS: THE

NEED TO APPLY THE PUBLIC FORUM AND TINKER DOCTRINES, 28 Tulsa L.J. 149, 212+
(1992)
1122 THE MODE IN THE MIDDLE: RECOGNIZING A NEW CATEGORY OF SPEECH
REGULATIONS FOR MODES OF EXPRESSION, 14 UCLA Ent. L. Rev. 47, 91 (2007)
1123 HIGH-PROFILE TRIALS: CAN GOVERNMENT SELL THE "RIGHT" TO BROADCAST THE
PROCEEDINGS?, 3 UCLA Ent. L. Rev. 169, 218 (1996)
1124 AN INFORMAL HISTORY OF HOW LAW SCHOOLS EVALUATE STUDENTS, WITH A
PREDICTABLE EMPHASIS ON LAW SCHOOL FINAL EXAMS, 65 UMKC L. Rev. 657, 718
(1997) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1125 CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF FEDERAL RESTRICTIONS ON SCIENTIFIC
RESEARCH AND COMMUNICATION, 60 UMKC L. Rev. 619, 643 (1992)
1126 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--ANTI-BIAS CRIME LEGISLATION AND THE FIRST
AMENDMENT--SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS WISCONSIN'S PENALTY ENHANCEMENT
LAW, WISCONSIN v. MITCHELL, 113 S. CT. 2194 (1993)., 16 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 659, 681
(1994) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1127 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-FREEDOM OF RELIGIOUS SPEECH-WHEN FREEDOM OF
SPEECH IN THE CLASSROOM CONFLICTS WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE.
BISHOP v. ARONOV, 926 F.2D 1066 (11TH CIR.1991)., 14 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 83, 105 (1991)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1128 FIRST AMENDMENT-CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM-THE SUPREME COURT HALTS THE
EIGHTH CIRCUIT'S INVALIDATION OF STATE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION LIMITS.
NIXON V. SHRINK MISSOURI GOVERNMENT POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, 120 S.
CT. 897 (200, 23 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 243, 271+ (2000)
1129 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-FIRST AMENDMENT-REGULATION PROHIBITING SLEEPING IN
NATIONAL PARKS UPHELD AS A VALID TIME, PLACE, AND MANNER REGULATION
REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SLEEPING IS SPEECH. CLARK v. COMMUNITY FOR
CREATIVE NON-VIOL, 15 U. Balt. L. Rev. 181, 187 (1985)
1130 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-COMMERCIAL SPEECH-FEDERAL STATUTE PROHIBITING
MAILING OF UNSOLICITED CONTRACEPTION ADVERTISEMENTS VIOLATES FIRST
AMENDMENT AS APPLIED TO ACCURATE MAILINGS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO
INFORMED DECISION MAKING. B, 14 U. Balt. L. Rev. 367, 379 (1985)
1131 COERCION, MISPERCEPTION AND EXCESSIVE ENTANGLEMENT WITH RELIGION: A
REEXAMINATION OF CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF MARYLAND, INC. V.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 39 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1941, 1973 (2006) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
1132 COMPASSION FATIGUE AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: ARE THE HOMELESS
CONSTITUTIONAL CASTAWAYS?, 27 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 255, 355 (1994)
1133 FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYMENT: THE
DECONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR WORKPLACE, 19 U.C. Davis L.
Rev. 597, 668 (1986) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1134 THE RETURN OF SEDITIOUS LIBEL, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1239, 1319+ (2008) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1135 ADJUDICATIVE SPEECH AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 51 UCLA L. Rev. 705, 797 (2004)
1136 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY AND CONSEQUENCES OF RESTRICTIONS ON CAMPAIGN
SPEECH BY CANDIDATES FOR JUDICIAL OFFICE, 35 UCLA L. Rev. 207, 263 (1987)
1137 A LOOK BACK AT COHEN v. CALIFORNIA, 34 UCLA L. Rev. 1595, 1614 (1987)
1138 BETWEEN GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT: THE HISTORY AND THEORY OF THE
PUBLIC FORUM, 34 UCLA L. Rev. 1713, 1742+ (1987) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
1139 CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 32 UCLA L. Rev. 904, 919+ (1985)
HN: 9,11 (S.Ct.)
1140 THE DALE PROBLEM: PROPERTY AND SPEECH UNDER THE REGULATORY STATE, 75 U.
Chi. L. Rev. 1541, 1600 (2008) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1141 THE TRADEMARK PRINCIPAL REGISTER AS A NONPUBLIC FORUM, 75 U. Chi. L. Rev.
1295, 1328+ (2008) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1142 SILENCING NULLIFICATION ADVOCACY INSIDE THE JURY ROOM AND OUTSIDE THE
COURTROOM, 65 U. Chi. L. Rev. 433, 500 (1998)
1143 RESTORING LESS-SPEECH-RESTRICTIVE ALTERNATIVES AFTER WARD V ROCK
AGAINST RACISM, 64 U. Chi. L. Rev. 349, 371 (1997)
1144 WORDS, CONDUCT, CASTE, 60 U. Chi. L. Rev. 795, 844 (1993)
1145 TEACHERS AND THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, 57 U. Chi. L. Rev. 929, 954 (1990) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
1146 POLITICAL PROTEST AND THE ILLINOIS DEFENSE OF NECESSITY, 54 U. Chi. L. Rev.
1070, 1094 (1987)
1147 CONTENT-NEUTRAL RESTRICTIONS, 54 U. Chi. L. Rev. 46, 67+ (1987) HN: 9,10,12 (S.Ct.)
1148 POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 53 U. Chi. L. Rev. 864, 890 (1986)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1149 POLITICAL PATRONAGE IN PUBLIC CONTRACTING, 51 U. Chi. L. Rev. 518, 557 (1984) HN:
9 (S.Ct.)
1150 UNIVERSITY REGULATION OF STUDENT SPEECH: CONSIDERING CONTENT-BASED
CRITERIA UNDER PUBLIC FORUM AND SUBSIDY DOCTRINES, 1991 U. Chi. Legal F. 393,
412 (1991)
1151 THE EXPANSION OF EXCLUSIVE PRIVILEGES FOR PUBLIC SECTOR UNIONS: A THREAT
TO FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS?, 53 U. Cin. L. Rev. 781, 800 (1984) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1152 LICENSED TO SPEAK: THE CASE OF VANITY PLATES, 72 U. Colo. L. Rev. 595, 661 (2001)
1153 INITIATIVE PETITION REFORMS AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 66 U. Colo. L. Rev. 129,
141 (1995)
1154 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CONTENT-BASED REGULATIONS ON SPEECH: A COMPARISON
OF THE CATEGORIZATION AND BALANCING APPROACHES TO JUDICIAL SCRUTINY-SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC. v. NEW YORK STATE CRIME VICTIMS BOARD, 112 S. CT. 501
(INT, 18 U. Dayton L. Rev. 593, 633 (1993)
1155 THE FIRST AMENDMENT, NEWSRACKS AND PUBLIC PROPERTY AFTER CITY OF
LAKEWOOD v. PLAIN DEALER PUBLISHING CO., 108 S.CT. 2138 (INTERIM ED. 1988), 14
U. Dayton L. Rev. 503, 539 (1989) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1156 HOMES, RIGHTS, AND PRIVATE COMMUNITIES, 20 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 479, 536 (2009)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1157 GRATIS DICTUM! THE LIMITS OF ACADEMIC FREE SPEECH ON THE INTERNET, 10 U.
Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 27, 55+ (1998) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1158 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CLOSING THE SCHOOLHOUSE GATE ON THE FIRST
AMENDMENT, 2 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 211, 224 (1989) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1159 CURTAILMENT OF EARLY ELECTION PREDICTIONS: CAN WE PREDICT THE
OUTCOME?, 36 U. Fla. L. Rev. 489, 520 (1984) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1160 NON-PROFIT PEDDLING IN WAIKIKI: TO PERMIT OR NOT TO PERMIT?, 17 U. Haw. L. Rev.
539, 574+ (1995) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1161 ESTES v. KAPIOLANI WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: STATE ACTION
AND THE BALANCE BETWEEN FREE SPEECH AND PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS IN
HAWAII, 13 U. Haw. L. Rev. 233, 278 (1991) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1162 THE CASE OF THE VANISHING PUBLIC FORUM, 1991 U. Ill. L. Rev. 949, 981+ (1991) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
1163 FIRST PRINCIPLES AND FAIR CONSIDERATION: THE DEVELOPING CLASH BETWEEN
THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE
LAWS, 52 U. Miami L. Rev. 247, 303 (1997)
1164 THE GREAT 1989-1990 FLAG FLAP: AN HISTORICAL, POLITICAL, AND LEGAL
ANALYSIS, 45 U. Miami L. Rev. 19, 106+ (1990)
1165 PLANNED PARENTHOOD: AN ABORTED ATTEMPT TO WAIVE RULE 52 (A)'S CLEARLY
ERRONEOUS STANDARD OF REVIEW IN THE PUBLIC FORUM, 40 U. Miami L. Rev. 307,
332 (1985)
1166 FREEDOM OF SPEECH: THE FLORIDA IMPLICATIONS OF PRUNE YARD SHOPPING
CENTER v. ROBBINS, 35 U. Miami L. Rev. 559, 580 (1981) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1167 OUT OF THIN AIR: USING FIRST AMENDMENT PUBLIC FORUM ANALYSIS TO REDEEM
AMERICAN BROADCASTING REGULATION, 39 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 149, 198 (2006) HN: 10
(S.Ct.)
1168 IS THERE AN OBLIGATION TO LISTEN?, 32 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 489, 543 (1999) HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
1169 CABLE TELEVISION RIGHTS OF WAY: TECHNOLOGY EXPANDS THE CONCEPT OF
PUBLIC FORUM, 20 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 1293, 1297+ (1987) HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
1170 THE BOUNDARIES OF RELIGIOUS SPEECH IN THE GOVERNMENT WORKPLACE, 1 U.
Pa. J. Lab. & Emp. L. 745, 788 (1998) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1171 JUSTICE BRENNAN AND THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH: A FIRST AMENDMENT ODYSSEY,
139 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1333, 1355 (1991) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1172 CONTENT DISCRIMINATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 139 U. Pa. L. Rev. 615, 730+
(1991) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1173 TRANSCENDENTAL NONSENSE, METAPHORIC REASONING, AND THE COGNITIVE
STAKES FOR LAW, 137 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1105, 1237 (1989) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1174 ALLOCATIONAL SANCTIONS: THE PROBLEM OF NEGATIVE RIGHTS IN A POSITIVE
STATE, 132 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1293, 1397+ (1984) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1175 LET THE AUTHOR BEWARE: THE REJUVENATION OF THE AMERICAN LAW OF LIBEL,
132 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1, 94 (1983)
1176 TESTING THE LIMITS OF ACADEMIC FREEDOM, 130 U. Pa. L. Rev. 712, 743 (1982) HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
1177 THE ASSERTED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS TO
DETERMINE WHAT THEY TEACH, 124 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1293, 1357 (1976)
1178 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF RESTRICTIONS ON INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO
CANDIDATES IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS, 122 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1609, 1646 (1974)
1179 REGULATION OF WHITE HOUSE DEMONSTRATIONS, 119 U. Pa. L. Rev. 668, 683 (1971)
1180 EAST-WEST TRADE BOYCOTTS: A STUDY IN PRIVATE, LABOR UNION, STATE, AND
LOCAL INTERFERENCE WITH FOREIGN POLICY, 118 U. Pa. L. Rev. 841, 938 (1970)
1181 INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AGAINST CAMPUS DISORDERS, 118 U. Pa. L. Rev. 746, 765 (1970)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1182 ANOTHER LOOK AT UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS, 117 U. Pa. L. Rev. 144, 163+
(1968)
1183 THE FUNCTION OF THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE, 116 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1048, 1117 (1968)
1184 WHY THE FIRST AMENDMENT CANNOT DICTATE COPYRIGHT POLICY, 65 U. Pitt. L. Rev.
281, 338 (2004) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1185 TORT LAW AND THE CENTRAL MEANING OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 51 U. Pitt. L. Rev.
493, 575+ (1990)
1186 PROPERTY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 31 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1, 10+ (1997) HN: 7,9,10
(S.Ct.)
1187 THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND THE POSTAL SERVICE'S SUBSCRIBER REQUIREMENT:
CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMS WITH DENYING EQUAL ACCESS TO THE POSTAL
SYSTEM, 21 U. Rich. L. Rev. 541, 569 (1987) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1188 PIGEONHOLES IN THE PUBLIC FORUM, 20 U. Rich. L. Rev. 499, 523 (1986) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1189 BROTHER CAN YOU SPARE SOME CHANGE?--AND YOUR PRIVACY TOO?: AVOIDING A
FATAL COLLISION BETWEEN PUBLIC INTERESTS AND BEGGARS' FIRST AMENDMENT
RIGHTS, 28 U.S.F. L. Rev. 309, 341+ (1994) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1190 THE ROLE OF VIEWPOINT NEUTRALITY IN NONPUBLIC FORA ACCESS RESTRICTIONS:
CORNELIUS v. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND, 20 U.S.F. L. Rev. 851,
875+ (1986) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1191 FIVE MODERN NOTIONS IN SEARCH OF AN AUTHOR: THE IDEOLOGY OF THE
INTIMATE SOCIETY IN CONSTITUTIONAL SPEECH LAW, 30 U. Tol. L. Rev. 251, 304+
(1999) HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1192 ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION COMMISSION V. FORBES-JOURNALISTIC
EDITORIAL DISCRETION OR UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRIOR RESTRAINT?, 30 U. Tol. L. Rev.
331, 357 (1999)
1193 THE EFFECT OF THE APPOINTMENT OF A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, 28 U. Tol. L. Rev.
37, 89+ (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1194 A THREE-DIMENSIONAL APPROACH TO THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE DISTINCTION, 2008 Utah
L. Rev. 635, 664 (2008) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1195 BE NO MORE CHILDREN: AN ANALYSIS OF ARTICLE I, SECTION 4 OF THE UTAH
CONSTITUTION, 1992 Utah L. Rev. 1431, 1495 (1992) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1196 THE SHANTIES, SYMBOLIC SPEECH, AND THE PUBLIC FORUM: RAMSHACKLE
PROTECTION FOR FREE EXPRESSION?, 1990 Utah L. Rev. 503, 542+ (1990) HN: 7,9,10
(S.Ct.)
1197 WHEN RIGHTS COLLIDE: HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT VS. FIRST AMENDMENT
FREE SPEECH, 31 UWLA L. Rev. 135, 162+ (2000)
1198 A BROAD ATTACK ON OVERBREADTH, 40 Val. U. L. Rev. 113, 122+ (2005) HN: 1,7,9 (S.Ct.)
1199 ASSURING FREEDOM FOR THE COLLEGE STUDENT PRESS AFTER HAZELWOOD, 24 Val.
U. L. Rev. 53, 76+ (1989) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1200 A NEW MIRANDA FOR FOREIGN NATIONALS? THE IMPACT OF FEDERALISM ON
INTERNATIONAL TREATIES THAT PLACE AFFIRMATIVE OBLIGATIONS ON STATE
GOVERNMENTS IN THE WAKE OF PRINTZ V. UNITED STATES, 31 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 997,
1039 (1998)
1201 MISTAKEN IDENTITY: UNVEILING THE PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS OF POLITICAL
MONEY, 53 Vand. L. Rev. 1235, 1310 (2000)
1202 LAMB'S CHAPEL v. CENTER MORICHES UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, 113 S. CT. 2141
(1993): A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S FIRST AMENDMENT
JURISPRUDENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 47 Vand. L. Rev. 1939, 1986
(1994) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)

1203 STATE RESTRICTIONS ON VIOLENT EXPRESSION: THE IMPROPRIETY OF EXTENDING
AN OBSCENITY ANALYSIS, 46 Vand. L. Rev. 473, 501 (1993) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1204 FIRST AMENDMENT STANDARDS FOR GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES OF ARTISTIC AND
CULTURAL EXPRESSION: A REPLY TO JUSTICES SCALIA AND REHNQUIST, 41 Vand. L.
Rev. 517, 534 (1988)
1205 TENSION BETWEEN THE FIRST AND TWENTY-FIRST AMENDMENTS IN STATE
REGULATION OF ALCOHOL ADVERTISING, 37 Vand. L. Rev. 1421, 1453 (1984)
1206 THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND NONPICKETING LABOR PUBLICITY UNDER SECTION
8(b)(4)(ii)(B) OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT, 36 Vand. L. Rev. 1469, 1509
(1983)
1207 CABLE FRANCHISING AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 36 Vand. L. Rev. 867, 926 (1983) HN:
9 (S.Ct.)
1208 THE PROPER ROLE OF RELIGION IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: EQUAL ACCESS INSTEAD
OF OFFICIAL INDOCTRINATION, 46 Vill. L. Rev. 487, 546 (2001)
1209 THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND MEDIA RIGHTS DURING WARTIME: SOME THOUGHTS
AFTER OPERATION DESERT STORM, 36 Vill. L. Rev. 1513, 1558 (1991)
1210 SECONDARY EFFECTS AND POLITICAL SPEECH: INTIMATIONS OF BROADER
GOVERNMENTAL REGULATORY POWER, 34 Vill. L. Rev. 995, 1033 (1989)
1211 THE NEW STANDARD OF REVIEW FOR PRISONERS' RIGHTS: A "TURNER' FOR THE
WORSE?TITURNER v. SAFLEY, 33 Vill. L. Rev. 393, 436 (1988)
1212 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-FREEDOM OF SPEECH-SINCE ADVERTISING DISPLAY AREAS
IN FEDERALLY-OWNED AIRPORTS ARE PUBLIC FORUMS, THE GOVERNMENT'S
PROHIBITION OF POLITICAL ADVERTISEMENTS VIOLATES THE FIRST AMENDMENT,
29 Vill. L. Rev. 535, 562+ (1984) HN: 4,7,9 (S.Ct.)
1213 VIEWPOINT DISCRIMINATION IN THE MILITARY CONTEXT: DEFINING THE
DEFERENCE DUE TO THE MILITARY HONOR AND DECENCY ACT OF 1996 IN GENERAL
MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.V. COHEN, 6 Vill. Sports & Ent. L.J. 127, 169+ (1999) HN:
10 (S.Ct.)
1214 IS THERE A RIGHT TO VIEW THE DEAD AT DOVER? JB PICTURES v. DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE: LIMITS ON THE MEDIA'S RIGHT TO GATHER INFORMATION, 4 Vill. Sports &
Ent. L.J. 387, 416+ (1997) HN: 9,10,12 (S.Ct.)
1215 RECONCILING SEXUAL HARASSMENT SANCTIONS AND FREE SPEECH RIGHTS IN THE
WORKPLACE, 4 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 127, 223 (1996) HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1216 CONTENT-BASED DISTINCTIONS IN A UNIVERSITY FUNDING SYSTEM AND THE
IRRELEVANCE OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE: PUTTING WIDE AWAKE TO REST, 81
Va. L. Rev. 1665, 1720 (1995) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1217 THE IWW FREE SPEECH FIGHTS AND POPULAR CONCEPTIONS OF FREE EXPRESSION
BEFORE WORLD WAR I, 80 Va. L. Rev. 1055, 1158 (1994) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1218 SUPER LIBERAL ROMANCE, COMMUNITY, AND TRADITION IN WILLIAM J. BRENNAN,
JR.'S CONSTITUTIONAL THOUGHT, 77 Va. L. Rev. 1261, 1332+ (1991)
1219 HIGH SCHOOL NEWSPAPERS AND THE PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE: HAZELWOOD
SCHOOL DISTRICT v. KUHLMEIER, 74 Va. L. Rev. 843, 862 (1988)
1220 THE MISLEADING NATURE OF PUBLIC FORUM ANALYSIS: CONTENT AND CONTEXT IN
FIRST AMENDMENT ADJUDICATION, 70 Va. L. Rev. 1219, 1266+ (1984) HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
1221 THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND CONTENT DISCRIMINATION, 68 Va. L. Rev. 203, 251+
(1982) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1222 4 Va. Sports & Ent. L.J. 1, FANS AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: CHEERING AND JEERING
IN COLLEGE SPORTS (2004)
1223 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: THE END OF THE LIMITED PUBLIC FORUM? (CORNELIUS v.
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC., 105 S. CT. 3439 (1985)), 25
Washburn L.J. 375, 384+ (1986) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1224 PERSONNEL IS POLICY: SCHOOLS, STUDENT GROUPS, AND THE RIGHT TO
DISCRIMINATE, 66 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1793, 1830 (2009)
1225 INTERSECTION AND DIVERGENCE: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE WARREN COURT,
CIVIL RIGHTS, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 59 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1075, 1088+ (2002)
HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
1226 THE COURT BETWEEN HEGEMONIES, 49 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 31, 52 (1992)
1227 THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN LITIGATION: THE "LAW OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT", 48
Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 457, 485+ (1991) HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1228 FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN SCHOOL AND PRISON, 85 Wash. L. Rev. 71, 105 (2010)
1229 FOUR-FACTOR DISASTER: COURTS SHOULD ABANDON THE CIRCUIT TEST FOR
DISTINGUISHING GOVERNMENT SPEECH FROM PRIVATE SPEECH, 83 Wash. L. Rev. 569,
597 (2008) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1230 FREEDOM'S ASSOCIATIONS, 77 Wash. L. Rev. 639, 767 (2002)
1231 AID OR OBSTRUCTION? GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF CABLE TELEVISION MEETS
THE FIRST AMENDMENT-PREFERRED COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. CITY OF LOS
ANGELES, 754 F.2D 1396 (9TH CIR.), AFFIRMED IN PART AND REMANDED, 54 U.S.L.W.
4542 (U., 61 Wash. L. Rev. 665, 701 (1986)
1232 PROPERTY AND SPEECH, 21 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 123, 154+ (2006) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1233 YOUR MONEY OR YOUR SPEECH: THE CHILDREN'S INTERNET PROTECTION ACT AND
THE CONGRESSIONAL ASSAULT ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN PUBLIC LIBRARIES,
80 Wash. U. L.Q. 1025, 1099 (2002) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1234 WHEN THE KLAN ADOPTS-A-HIGHWAY: THE WEAKNESSES OF THE PUBLIC FORUM
DOCTRINE EXPOSED, 77 Wash. U. L.Q. 557, 583+ (1999)
1235 FORMALISM IN THE FORUM? UNITED STATES v. KOKINDA AND THE EXTENSION OF
THE PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE, 69 Wash. U. L.Q. 957, 967+ (1991) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1236 POST-PRUNEYARD ACCESS TO MICHIGAN SHOPPING CENTERS: THE "MALLING' OF
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 30 Wayne L. Rev. 93, 126 (1983)
1237 EXPRESSIVE ASSOCIATION-STUDENT ORGANIZATIONS' RIGHT TO DISCRIMINATE: A
LOOK AT PUBLIC LAW SCHOOLS' NONDISCRIMINATION POLICIES AND THEIR
APPLICATION TO CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY STUDENT CHAPTERS, 29 W. New Eng. L.
Rev. 757, 799 (2007)
1238 CIVIL RESISTANCE: REVITALIZING INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE NUCLEAR AGE, 13
Whittier L. Rev. 17, 105+ (1992) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1239 FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF CHARITABLE SOLICITATION, 13 Whittier L. Rev.
669, 711 (1992)
1240 THE POLITICAL CORRECTNESS DOCTRINE: REDEFINING SPEECH ON COLLEGE
CAMPUSES, 13 Whittier L. Rev. 805, 829 (1992) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1241 OREGON CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE RIGHT TO ENTER PRIVATE PROPERTY
TO ENGAGE IN PETITION ACTIVITY, 27 Willamette L. Rev. 123, 146 (1991) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
1242 SEEN BUT NOT HEARD: IN WHAT FORUM MAY HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS EXERCISE
FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS AFTER HAZELWOOD?, 25 Willamette L. Rev. 197, 222 (1989)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1243 THE SIT-INS AND THE STATE ACTION DOCTRINE, 18 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 767, 829
(2010)
1244 SCIENTER, CAUSATION, AND HARM IN FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION ANALYSIS: THE
RIGHT HAND SIDE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CALCULUS, 13 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 125,
203 (2004)
1245 EQUALITY AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: THE HATE SPEECH DILEMMA, 32 Wm. &
Mary L. Rev. 211, 265 (1991)
1246 CURRICULUM, PEDAGOGY, AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF TEACHERS IN
SECONDARY SCHOOLS, 25 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1, 79 (1983)
1247 THE CREATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO FREE EXPRESSION: FROM THE
EIGHTEENTH CENTURY TO THE MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY, 34 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 773,
1020+ (2008) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1248 FROM CATEGORIZING TO BALANCING LIBERTY INTERESTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL
JURISPRUDENCE:AN EMERGING SLIDING-SCALE TEST IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT AND
PUBLIC SCHOOL UNIFORM POLICIES, 2001 Wis. L. Rev. 1583, 1617 (2001) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1249 THE SHELF LIFE OF JUSTICE HUGO L. BLACK, 1997 Wis. L. Rev. 1, 30 (1997) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1250 LAMB'S CHAPEL V. CENTER MORICHES UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT: CREATING
GREATER PROTECTION FOR RELIGIOUS SPEECH THROUGH THE ILLUSION OF PUBLIC
FORUM ANALYSIS, 1994 Wis. L. Rev. 965, 1003+ (1994) HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1251 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - A FORUM BY ANY OTHER NAME . . . WOULD BE JUST AS
CONFUSING: THE TENTH CIRCUIT DISMISSES INTENT FROM THE PUBLIC FORUM.
FIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH V. SALT LAKE CITY CORP., 308 F.3D 1114 (10TH CIR. 2002)., 4
Wyo. L. Rev. 753, 793+ (2004) HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1252 WHEN STUDENTS SPEAK: JUDICIAL REVIEW IN THE ACADEMIC MARKETPLACE, 7 Yale
L. & Pol'y Rev. 343, 360+ (1989) HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1253 ANONYMITY, AUTONOMY, AND ACCOUNTABILITY: CHALLENGES TO THE FIRST
AMENDMENT IN CYBERSPACES, 104 Yale L.J. 1639, 1679 (1995)
1254 MAKING SENSE OF OVERBREADTH, 100 Yale L.J. 853, 908 (1991)
1255 PETITIONING AND THE EMPOWERMENT THEORY OF PRACTICE, 96 Yale L.J. 569, 592+
(1987) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1256 A SHORT HISTORY OF THE RIGHT TO PETITION GOVERNMENT FOR THE REDRESS OF
GRIEVANCES, 96 Yale L.J. 142, 166 (1986)
1257 WHOSE RIGHTS? WHAT DANGER?, 94 Yale L.J. 970, 995+ (1985) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1258 PRIVATE ABRIDGMENT OF SPEECH AND THE STATE CONSTITUTIONS, 90 Yale L.J. 165,
188+ (1980) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1259 THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO GATHER STATE-HELD INFORMATION, 89 Yale L.J.
923, 939+ (1980) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1260 POLITICS AND THE CONSTITUTION: IS MONEY SPEECH?, 85 Yale L.J. 1001, 1021+ (1976)
1261 THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN THEORY AND PRACTICE The System of Freedom of Expression.
By Thomas I. Emerson. New York: Random House, 1970. Pp. ix, 728. $20.00 (clothbound), $3.95
(paperback), 80 Yale L.J. 1070, 1091 (1971) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1262 EQUITY ON THE CAMPUS: THE LIMITS OF INJUNCTIVE REGULATION OF UNIVERSITY
PROTEST, 80 Yale L.J. 987, 1010+ (1971) HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1263 THE SUPREME COURT, CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL DISSONANCE, 77 Yale L.J. 1520, 1544+
(1968)
1264 GROUP LEGAL SERVICES AND THE CONSTITUTION, 76 Yale L.J. 966, 992 (1967)
1265 RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION IN THE MUSEUM, SB53 American Law Institute-American Bar
Association 29 (1997) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1266 127 BNA Daily Labor Report A-12, 2003 (2003) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1267 229 BNA Daily Labor Report D-22, 2002 (2002)
1268 150 BNA Daily Labor Report E-1, 1999 (1999) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1269 54 BNA Daily Labor Report D-1, 1986, DECISION OF U.S. DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN
TEXAS, IN NASH V. STATE OF TEXAS (TEXT) (1986) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1270 1/24/2000 BNA U.S. Law Week - Supreme Court Today D3 (2000)
1271 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN FRANCHISE OVERBUILDS AND OTHER FIRST
AMENDMENT LITIGATION, 330 Practising Law Institute Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, &
Literary Property 399 (1992)
1272 FRANCHISE OVERBUILDS AND OTHER FIRST AMENDMENT CABLE LITIGATION, 309
Practising Law Institute Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, & Literary Property 485 (1991) HN: 10
(S.Ct.)
1273 THE IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS ON REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT:
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW, 307 Practising Law Institute Real Estate Law and Practice 17
(1988) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1274 REJECTED ADVERTISING IN STUDENT PUBLICATIONS AT PUBLIC SCHOOLS,
COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES: A SURVEY OF THE CASELAW, 133 Ed. Law Rep. 1, 16
(1999)
1275 TRENDS IN JUDICIAL ANALYSIS SINCE HAZELWOOD: EXPRESSIVE RIGHTS IN THE
PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 123 Ed. Law Rep. 1, 36 (1998) HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1276 UPON THE ADVENT OF PERRY: A REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL
CHALLENGES TO THE USE OF SCHOOL MAIL FACILITIES BY MINORITY
REPRESENTATIVES, 7 Ed. Law Rep. 475, 476+ (1983)
1277 THE SUPREME COURT'S PERRY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION DECISION:
UNDERESTIMATING THE IMPORTANCE OF THE EXCLUSIVITY PRINCIPLE, 11 Ed. Law
Rep. 1, 8 (1983)
Court Documents
Appellate Court Documents (U.S.A.)
Appellate Petitions, Motions and Filings

1278 Weise v. Casper, 2010 WL 3198837, *3198837+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug
11, 2010) Brief for Respondent Michael Casper in Opposition to Petition for Certiorari (NO.
10-67) "
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1279 Morgan v. Plano Independent School Dist., 2010 WL 1554525, *1554525+ (Appellate Petition,
Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 19, 2010) Amicus Curiae Brief of the American Center for Law
and Justice in Support of Petitioners (NO. 09-1131)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1280 Sain v. Snyder, 2010 WL 1775854, *1775854 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 14,
2010) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 09-1332) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1281 McCullen v. Coakley, 2010 WL 391256, *391256+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S.
Feb 01, 2010) Brief in Opposition (NO. 09-592)
1282 Palmer v. Waxahachie Independent School Dist., 2009 WL 3687188, *3687188+ (Appellate Petition,
Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 04, 2009) Amicus Curiae Brief of the American Center for Law
and Justice in Support of Petitioner (NO. 09-409)
1283 Macerich Management Co. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America Local 586,
2009 WL 2625815, *2625815+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 24, 2009) Petition
for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 09-235) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1284 Gilles v. Blanchard, 2007 WL 2274443, *2274443+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S.
Aug 06, 2007) Brief in Opposition (NO. 06-1617)
1285 Kitt v. United States of America, 2007 WL 1772133, *1772133+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and
Filing) (U.S. Jun 19, 2007) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-1682)
HN: 7 (S.Ct.)
1286 Faith Center Church Evangelistic Ministries v. Glover, 2007 WL 1670270, *1670270+ (Appellate
Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 07, 2007) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-1633)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1287 Gilles v. Blanchard, 2007 WL 1624823, *1624823+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S.
Jun 05, 2007) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-1617) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1288 Schulz v. Washington County Bd. of Sup'rs, 2006 WL 1048938, *1048938+ (Appellate Petition,
Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 14, 2006) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 05-1331)
HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
1289 Mutnick v. Superior Court of California, Alameda County, 2006 WL 302429, *302429 (Appellate
Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 06, 2006) Reply to Brief in Opposition (NO. 05-860) HN:
6 (S.Ct.)
1290 Ally v. Graver, 2005 WL 3851420, *3851420 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 16,
2005) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 05-1166)
1291 City of Fairfield, Ohio v. Tucker, 2005 WL 1811044, *1811044+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and
Filing) (U.S. Jul 26, 2005) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 05-153)
HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
1292 Brokaw v. Qualcomm, Inc., 2005 WL 1457706, *1457706+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(U.S. Jun 14, 2005) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 04-1711)
HN: 8 (S.Ct.)
1293 Frye v. Tarwater, 2005 WL 354067, *354067+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 11,
2005) Brief for the Respondents in Opposition (NO. 04-788) "
HN: 9,11 (S.Ct.)
1294 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Appellants, v. AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION,
INC., et al., Appellees., 2003 WL 21699043, *21699043+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(U.S. Jan 10, 2003) Brief Amicus Curiae of the American Center for Law and Justice and Hons.
Robert B. Aderholdt, Todd Akin, Michael Collins, Jo Ann S. Davis, Duncan Hunter, Ernest
Istook, Jr., Charles Pickering, Jr., ... (NO. 02-361)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1295 Benjamin K. ORIN, Petitioner, v. Richard BARCLAY, et al., Respondents., 2002 WL 32135939,
*32135939+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 14, 2002) Reply Brief for Petitioner
(NO. 01-1440) "
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1296 Benjamin K. ORIN, Petitioner, v. Richard BARCLAY, and his marital community in his individual
and official capacity; Robert Wallace, and his marital community, in his individual capacity; Alan
Hornberg, and his marital community, in his individual capacity; Rick McClusky, and his marital
community, in his individual capacity; City of Bremerton, a municipal corporation, Respondents.,
2002 WL 32135934, *32135934+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 31, 2002) Brief
in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 01-1440) "
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1297 Joseph SCHEIDLER, Andrew Scholberg, Timothy Murphy, and the Pro-Life Action League, Inc.,
Petitioners, v. NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN, INC., et al., Respondents., 2002 WL
32101182, *32101182+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Mar 04, 2002) Motion of
Seamless Garment Network, Sojourners, Southern Christian Leadership Conference, et al.,
and Brief Amicus Curiae in Support of Granting the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
United ... (NO. 01-1118, 01-1119)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1298 Caren Cronk THOMAS and Windy City Hemp Development Board, Petitioners, v. CHICAGO
PARK DISTRICT, Respondent., 2001 WL 34091943, *34091943+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and
Filing) (U.S. Mar 29, 2001) Petitioner's Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO.
00-1249)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1299 Alicja MATCZAK, et al., Petitioners, v. J.J. DAHL, et al., Respondents., 2001 WL 34117121,
*34117121+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 28, 2001) Petition for a Writ of
Certiorari (NO. 00-1362)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1300 Paul Gordon ALLEYNE, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.,
2001 WL 34116775, *34116775+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 13, 2001)
Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 00-1309)
HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1301 Dr. Marvin FRANDSEN, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent., 1999 WL
33641283, *33641283+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 28, 1999) Brief of
Amicus Curiae, Brevard County, Florida, in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO.
98-1726) "
HN: 9,11 (S.Ct.)
1302 John Hubert MOLL, Petitioner, v. The State of Florida, Respondent., 1998 WL 34102897,
*34102897+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 24, 1998) Brief of Amicus Curiae,
Brevard County, Florida, in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 97-1904) "
HN: 9,11 (S.Ct.)
1303 THE BRONX HOUSEHOLD OF FAITH, Jack Roberts and Robert Hall, Petitioners, v. THE
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Community School District No. 10
and Charles Williams, Respondents., 1998 WL 34102762, *34102762+ (Appellate Petition, Motion
and Filing) (U.S. Feb 19, 1998) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 97-1361)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1304 ONE WORLD ONE FAMILY NOW, a Hawaii non-profit corporation; James McDonough, an
individual; Bhaktivedanta Mission, Ltd., a Hawaii non-profit corporation; and Anton Voight, an
individual, Petitioners, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; Frank F. Fasi, individually and in
his capacity as Mayor of the City and County of Honolulu; Michael Nakamura, Chief of Police;
Donna Woo, individually and in her capacity as Special Deputy Attorney General of the State of,
1996 WL 33438878, *33438878+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 01, 1996) Brief
in Opposition (NO. 96-521)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1305 David HELLER, Petitioner, v. Sylvia Smith BOWMAN, Respondent., 1995 WL 17047985,
*17047985+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 10, 1995) Brief for the Respondent
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1306 GOLD COAST PUBLICATIONS, INC. and NEW TIMES, INC., Petitioners, v. THE CITY OF
CORAL GABLES., 1995 WL 17048715, *17048715+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S.
Sep 26, 1995) Brief for the Respondent in Opposition (NO. 95-160) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1307 Anthony DANIEL, Petitioner, v. CITY OF TAMPA, Florida; Audley Evans, Executive Director,
Tampa Housing Authority, in his official capacity, Respondents., 1995 WL 17047531, *17047531
(Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 20, 1995) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO.
94-1771)
1308 THE ADVOCATES FOR LIFE, INC., an Oregon Nonprofit Corporation, et al., Petitioners, v.
LOVEJOY SPECIALTY HOSPITAL, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Respondent., 1994 WL
16100461, *16100461+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 18, 1994) Respondent's
Brief in Opposition (NO. 93-1434)
HN: 2,10 (S.Ct.)
1309 LAMB'S CHAPEL, et al., Petitioners, v. CENTER MORICHES UNION FREE SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al., 1992 WL 12012064, *12012064+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S.
Nov 19, 1992) Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners (NO. 912024)
1310 Lamb's CHAPEL and John Steigerwald, Petitioners, v. CENTER MORICHES UNION FREE
SCHOOL DISTRICT, Louise Tramontano in her official capacity as President of the Board of
Education for Center Moriches Schools, and New York State Attorney General's Office,
Respondents., 1992 WL 12012085, *12012085+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun
16, 1992) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 91-2024)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1311 THE CITY OF CINCINNATI, Petitioner, v. DISCOVERY NETWORK, INC., et al., Respondents.,
1992 WL 12012055, *12012055+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 01, 1992) Brief
Amici Curiae of American Newspaper Publishers Association; Affiliated Publications, Inc.; the
Copley Press, Inc.; Donrey Media Group; Dow Jones & Company, Inc.; Gannett Co., Inc.;
Landmark ... (NO. 91-1200)
HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1312 THE CITY OF CINCINNATI, Petitioner, v. DISCOVERY NETWORK, INC., et al., Respondents.,
1992 WL 12012057, *12012057+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 01, 1992) Brief
of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, National Institute of Municipal Law Officers, Council of
State Governments, National Governors' Association, National Association of Counties,
International ... (NO. 91-1200) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1313 Robert PEARSON, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent., 1991 WL
11178097, *11178097+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 17, 1991) Reply Brief of
Petitioners (NO. 90-1620)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1314 Robert PEARSON, et. al, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA., 1991 WL 11178096,
*11178096+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 12, 1991) Brief for the United States
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1315 Calvert H. FLETCHER and N. Karene Fletcher, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent., 1991 WL 11176688, *11176688+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May
28, 1991) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 90-1826) "
1316 Sandra R. KEMP, Petitioner, v. STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE, and Colorado State
University; Roselyn Keller, in her capacity as a Conciliation Officer at Colorado State University;
Dana Hiatt, in her capacity as Director of Office of Equal Opportunity at Colorado State University;
and Phillip Austin, in his capacity as President of Colorado State University, Respondents., 1991 WL
11177129, *11177129+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 15, 1991) Petition for
Writ of Certiorari (NO. 90-1584)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1317 Dr. Ezzat Majd POUR, Petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL LICENSURE BOARD, Respondent.,
1990 WL 10058543, *10058543+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 22, 1990)
Petition (NO. 90-650)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1318 H-CHH Associates v. Citizens for Representative Govern, 1988 WL 1093569, *1093569+ (Appellate
Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 26, 1988) Petition (NO. 87-1276)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1319 Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles v. Ellard, 1987 WL 955221, *955221+ (Appellate Petition,
Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 23, 1987) Petition (NO. 87-849)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1320 Draine v. U.S., 1987 WL 954731, *954731+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 11,
1987) Petition (NO. 86-1989)
HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1321 McKinney v. Missouri, 1987 WL 955207, *955207+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S.
Jan 15, 1987) Petition (NO. 86-1170)
1322 Wivorkoski v. Com. of Pennsylvania, 1985 WL 695308, *695308+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and
Filing) (U.S. May 23, 1985) Petition (NO. 84-1861)
HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1323 Meese v. Abbott, 1983 WL 503625, *503625+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb
1983) Petition (NO. 87-1344)

HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1324 O'Leary v. Com. of Kentucky, 1969 WL 136716, *136716+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(U.S. Aug 28, 1969) Jurisdictional Statement (NO. 526) "
HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
1325 Cowgill v. People of the State of California, 1969 WL 136712, *136712+ (Appellate Petition,
Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 22, 1969) Jurisdictional Statement. (NO. 496)
HN: 9,11 (S.Ct.)
1326 Boyle v. Landry, 1968 WL 129284, *129284+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 28,
1968) Jurisdictional Statement (NO. 4)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1327 Savio v. People of the State of California, 1967 WL 129554, *129554+ (Appellate Petition, Motion
and Filing) (U.S. May 17, 1967) Jurisdictional Statement (NO. 1399)
HN: 3,7,9 (S.Ct.)
1328 Ackleema ALLY, doing business as Ahmad Meat M, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard S. GRAVER,
Sheriff Kerry J.Katsorhis Deputy Sheriff Martello. Chandra Kishore and Prabha Palmour, a/k/a
Ralph Sukhoo and Rosaline Sukhoo, Defendants., 2005 WL 3949312, *3949312 (Appellate Petition,
Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Jan 08, 2005) Petition for Rehearing (NO. 04-0665-CV) HN: 2,3,7
(S.Ct.)
1329 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Jose Fernandez LOPEZ,
Defendant and Appellant., 2010 WL 2624960, *2624960+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing)
(Cal. May 11, 2010) Petition for Review (NO. S182570)
1330 Miguel MOREIRA-ALTARO, Petitioner, v. Warden AYERS, Respondent., 2008 WL 4967851,
*4967851+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Oct 10, 2008) Petition for Review on Writ
of Habeas Corpus (NO. S167443)
1331 Richard E. THOMAS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. John QUINTERO, Defendant and Appellant.,
2005 WL 1181426, *1181426+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Mar 16, 2005) Petition
for Review (NO. S132252)
1332 Penelope LANKHEIM, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY, BOARD OF
TRUSTEES, Respondent., 2009 WL 360325, *360325+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Fla.
Feb 04, 2009) Petitioner's Brief on Jurisdiction (NO. SC08-2403)
1333 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John David SMITH, Defendant-Appellant., 2004 WL
5303089, *5303089 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Ohio Aug 30, 2004) Appellant's Brief
(P) (NO. 04-1442)
1334 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles S. SPINGOLA, Defendant-Appellant., 2000 WL
34333569, *34333569 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Ohio Feb 07, 2000) Memorandum
in Support of Jurisdiction of Appellant Charles S. Spingola (NO. 2000-257)
Appellate Briefs
1335 Christian Legal Society Chapter of University of California, Hastings College of the Law v.
Martinez, 2010 WL 977370, *977370+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 15, 2010) Brief of the National
LGBT Bar Association, The National LGBT Bar Association Law Student Division and 55
LGBT Law Student Organizations as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 08-1371)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1336 McDonald v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 4099513, *4099513+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 23, 2009)
Brief of The American Civil Rights Union, Let Freedom Ring, Committee for Justice, and The
Family Research Council, as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners (NO. 08-1521)
HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
1337 Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Association, 2008 WL 3539501, *3539501+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Aug 08, 2008) Brief of Respondents Pocatello Education Association, et al. (NO. 07-869)
HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
1338 Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. Summum, 2008 WL 2555217, *2555217+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun
23, 2008) Brief for Amicus Curiae Liberty Counsel in Support of Petitioner (NO. 07-665) "
HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1339 Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. Summum, 2008 WL 2555221, *2555221+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun
23, 2008) Brief of Amicus Curiae Boy Scouts of America in Support of Neither Party (NO. 07665) "
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1340 Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Association, 2008 WL 2355780, *2355780+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Jun 06, 2008) Brief of Americans for Limited Government, as Amicus Curiae in Support of
Petitioners (NO. 07-869) "
HN: 9,10,12 (S.Ct.)
1341 G. K. Ltd. Travel v. City of Lake Oswego, Oregon, 2006 WL 2054350, *2054350+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Jul 17, 2006) Brief for International Sign Association as Amici Curiae in Support of the
Petitioners (NO. 05-1603)
1342 Beard v. Banks, 2006 WL 403661, *403661+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 16, 2006) Brief for Prison
Legal News, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, The Freedom to Read
Foundation, The Association of American Publishers, The American Booksellers Foundation
for Free ... (NO. 04-1739)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1343 Virginia v. Hicks, 2003 WL 1041672, *1041672+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 07, 2003) Brief of
Petitioner (NO. 02-371)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1344 Virginia v. Hicks, 2003 WL 1090207, *1090207 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 07, 2003) Brief of
Amici Curiae City of Richmond and Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority in
Support of Appellant's Brief on the Merits (NO. 02-371)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1345 Virginia v. Hicks, 2003 WL 1090210, *1090210+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 07, 2003) Brief of
Amici Curiae Council of Large Public Housing Authorities, Housing and Development Law
Institute, Housing Authority Risk Retention Group, National Association of Housing and
Redevelopment ... (NO. 02-371)
HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1346 Virginia v. Hicks, 2003 WL 1090212, *1090212+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 07, 2003) Brief for
the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioner (NO. 02-371)
HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
1347 U.S. v. American Library Ass'n, Inc., 2003 WL 124682, *124682+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 10,
2003) Brief Amicus Curiae of the American Center for Law and Justice and Hons. Robert B.
Aderholdt, Todd Akin, Michael Collins, Jo Ann S. Davis, Duncan Hunter, Ernest Istook, Jr.,
Charles Pickering, Jr., ... (NO. 02-361)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1348 Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc., 2002 WL 1594370, *1594370+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Jul 12, 2002) Brief Amicus Curiae Of Seamless Garment Network, Feminists For
Life Of America, The Fund For Animals, Not Dead Yet, Sojourners, Witnesses For
Reconciliation, Wendell Berry, Abe Bonowitz, Bernard ... (NO. 01-1118, 01-1119)
HN: 1
(S.Ct.)
1349 Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 2000 WL 1784144, *1784144+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Nov 30, 2000) BRIEF OF LIBERTY COUNSEL AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF
PETITIONERS (NO. 99-2036)
1350 Hill v. Colorado, 1999 WL 1186250, *1186250+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 13, 1999) BRIEF OF
THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS AND THE
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF
RESPONDENTS (NO. 98-1856)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1351 Hill v. Colorado, 1999 WL 1146869, *1146869+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 10, 1999) BRIEF ON
THE MERITS FOR RESPONDENTS KEN SALAZAR, STATE OF COLORADO, BILL
OWENS, GOVERNOR AND CITY OF LAKEWOOD (NO. 98-1856)
1352 Arkansas Educational Television Com'n v. Forbes, 1997 WL 365332, *365332+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Jul 02, 1997) RESPONDENT'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION (NO. 96-779)

HN: 7 (S.Ct.)
1353 Arkansas Educational Television Com'n v. Forbes, 1997 WL 311440, *311440+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. May 30, 1997) BRIEF FOR THE PETITIONER (NO. 96-779)
HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1354 Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York, 1996 WL 365804, *365804 (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Jul 01, 1996) BRIEF OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION,
AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION, CATHOLICS FOR A FREE CHOICE,
CONNECTICUT WOMEN'S EDUCATION AND LEGAL FUND, INC., FAMILY
PLANNING ADVOCATES OF ... (NO. 95-1065)
1355 Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York, 1996 WL 365809, *365809+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Jul 01, 1996) BRIEF FOR RESPONDENTS (NO. 95-1065)
1356 Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York, 1996 WL 375682, *375682 (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Jun 01, 1996) BRIEF OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION,
AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION, CATHOLICS FOR A FREE CHOICE,
CONNECTICUT WOMEN'S EDUCATION AND LEGAL FUND, INC., FAMILY
PLANNING ADVOCATES OF ... (NO. 95-1065)
1357 Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc., 1994 WL 114658, *114658+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 01,
1994) BRIEF FOR RESPONDENTS (NO. 93-880) "
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1358 Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School Dist., 1992 WL 540801, *540801+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Nov 19, 1992) BRIEF FOR PETITIONERS (NO. 91-2024)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1359 International Soc. For Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee, 1992 WL 526161, *526161+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Mar 10, 1992) BRIEF OF RESPONDENT-CROSS-PETITIONER (NO. 91-155, 91339) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1360 R.A.V., Petitioner, v. CITY OF ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA, Respondent., 1991 WL 11003962,
*11003962+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 23, 1991) Brief Amicus Curiae of the National Black
Women's Health Project in Support of Respondent (NO. 90-7675)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1361 The United States of America, Petitioner, v. Marsha B. KOKINDA and Kevin E. Pearl,
Respondents., 1989 WL 1127150, *1127150+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 20, 1989) Brief Amicus
Curiae of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California, Inc. In Support of
Respondents (NO. 88-2031) "
HN: 4,7,9 (S.Ct.)
1362 United States Of America, Petitioners, v. Marsha B. KOKINDA and Kevin E. Pearl, Respondents.,
1989 WL 1127153, *1127153+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 20, 1989) Brief of Free Speech
Advocates As Amicus Curiae In Support of Respondents (NO. 88-2031)
1363 United States v. Kokinda, 1989 WL 430595, *430595+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 20, 1989)
BRIEF FOR RESPONDENTS (NO. 88-2031)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1364 United States of America, Petitioner, v. Marsha B. KOKINDA and Kevin E. Pearl, Respondents.,
1989 WL 1127140, *1127140+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 18, 1989) Brief Amicus Curiae of
Newport News Daily Press & Times Herald Richmond Times-Dispatch and News Leader USA
Today the Washington Post in Support of Respondents (NO. 88-2031)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1365 United States of America, Petitioner, v. Marsha B. KOKINDA and Kevin E. Pearl, Respondents.,
1989 WL 1127136, *1127136+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 15, 1989) Brief Amicus Curiae of the
American Civil Liberties Union and the Aclu of Maryland in Support of Respondents (NO. 882031)
1366 United States of America, Petitioner, v. Marsha B. KOKINDA and Kevin E. Pearl., 1989 WL
1127131, *1127131+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 16, 1989) Brief For The United States (NO. 882031) "
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1367 U.S. v. Kokinda, 1989 WL 430596, *430596+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 16, 1989) BRIEF FOR
THE UNITED STATES (NO. 88-2031) "
HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1368 United States of America, Petitioner, v. Marsha B. KOKINDA, et al., Respondents., 1989 WL
1127147, *1127147+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1989) Brief for the American Federation of
Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations As Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents
(NO. 88-2031) "
HN: 4,7,9 (S.Ct.)
1369 United States of America, Petitioner. v. Marsha B. KOKINDA and Kevin E. Pearl, Respondents.,
1989 WL 1127156, *1127156+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1989) Brief for Respondents (NO.
88-2031)
HN: 4,7,9 (S.Ct.)
1370 United States of America, Petitioner, v. Marsha B. KOKINDA and Kevin E. Pearl., 1989 WL
1127158, *1127158+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1989) Reply Brief For The United States
(NO. 88-2031) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1371 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Petitioners,
v. Todd FOX, et al., Respondents., 1988 WL 1025852, *1025852+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 17,
1988) Brief for Petitioners (NO. 87-2013) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1372 Richard L. THORNBURGH, Attorney General of the United States, et al., petitioners, v. Jack
ABBOTT, et al., 1988 WL 1025676, *1025676+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 22, 1988) Reply Brief
for the Petitioners (NO. 87-1344) "
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1373 Edwin MEESE III, Attorney General of the United States, et al., petitioners, v. Jack ABBOTT, et al.,
1988 WL 1025664, *1025664 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 30, 1988) Brief for the Petitioners (NO.
87-1344)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1374 Russell FRISBY, et al., Appellants, v. Sandra C. SCHULTZ and Robert C. Braun, Appellees., 1988
WL 1026259, *1026259+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 26, 1988) Brief Amici Curiae of American
Life League, Inc., Christian Advocates Serving Evangelism, and Free Speech Advocates in
Support of Appellees (NO. 87-168)
1375 Russell FRISBY, et al., Appellants, v. Sandra C. SCHULTZ, et al., Appellees., 1988 WL 1026252,
*1026252 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 25, 1988) Brief of the American Federation of Labor and
Congress of Industrial Organizations as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellees (NO. 87-168)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
WL 1026255, *1026255+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 25, 1988) Brief for Appellees (NO. 87-168) "
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
*1031671 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 25, 1988) Brief of the American Federation of Labor and
Congress of Industrial Organizations as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellees (NO. 87-168)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
*1026250+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 25, 1988) Brief of the National League of Cities,
International City Management Association, U.S. Conference of Mayors, and National
Association of Counties as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellants (NO. 87-168)
HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
*1031669+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 25, 1988) Brief of the National League of Cities,
International City Management Association, U.S. Conference of Mayors, and National
Association of Counties as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellants (NO. 87-168)
HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
*1026248+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 23, 1988) Brief Amicus Curiae of Pacific Legal
Foundation in Support of Appellants (NO. 87-168) "
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
*881042+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1987) Brief Amicus Curiae of Pacific Legal
Foundation in Support of Appellants (NO. 87-168) "
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
WL 881043, *881043+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1987) Brief for Appellees (NO. 87-168) "
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
WL 881044, *881044+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1987) Brief Amici Curiae of American
Life League, Inc., Christian Advocates Serving Evangelism, and Free Speech Advocates in
Support of Appellees (NO. 87-168)
1384 Richard E. LYNG, Secretary of Agriculture, et al., Petitioners, v. NORTHWEST INDIAN
CEMETERY PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, et al., Respondents., 1987 WL 880357, *880357+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 22, 1987) Brief Amici Curiae of American Jewish Congress, in Behalf
of Itself and the Bureau of Catholic Indian Missions, in Support of Respondents (NO. 86-1013)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1385 Michael BOOS, J. Michael Waller and Bridget Brooker, Petitioners, v. Marion S. BARRY, Jr.,
Maurice T. Turner, the District of Columbia and Father R. David Finzer, Respondents., 1987 WL
881335, *881335+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 08, 1987) Brief for Respondents (NO. 86-803)
HN: 3 (S.Ct.)
1386 HAZELWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al, Petitioners, v. Cathy KUHLMEIER, et al, Respondents.,
1987 WL 864173, *864173+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 26, 1987) Brief of Respondents (NO. 86836)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1387 CITY OF LAKEWOOD, Appellant, v. PLAIN DEALER PUBLISHING CO., Appellee., 1987 WL
881422, *881422+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 16, 1987) Appellant's Brief on the Merits (NO. 861042) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1388 CITY OF LAKEWOOD, Appellant, v. PLAIN DEALER PUBLISHING CO., Appellee., 1987 WL
881972, *881972+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 15, 1987) Brief of the National League of Cities,
Council of State Governments, United States Conference of Mayors, International City
Management Association, and National Association of Counties as Amici ... (NO. 86-1042) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1389 HAZELWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Petitioners, v. Cathy KUHLMEIER, et al.,
Respondents., 1987 WL 864172, *864172+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 30, 1987) Brief for the
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1390 THE BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.,
Petitioners, v. JEWS FOR JESUS, INC., et al., Respondents., 1987 WL 880975, *880975+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 10, 1987) Brief for Respondents (NO. 86-104)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1391 CITY OF HOUSTON, Texas, Appellant, v. Raymond Wayne HILL, Appellee., 1987 WL 880959,
*880959+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 05, 1987) Brief for Appellee Raymond Wayne Hill (NO. 86243)
Petitioners, v. JEWS FOR JESUS, INC., et al., Respondents., 1986 WL 727980, *727980+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 24, 1986) Brief of the Rutherford Institute, and the Rutherford
Institutes of Alabama, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, ... (NO. 86-104)
1393 BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Petitioner, v.
JEWS FOR JESUS, INC., et al., Respondents., 1986 WL 727979, *727979+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Dec 23, 1986) Brief Amicus Curiae of Christian Legal Society and National Association of
Evangelicals in Support of Respondents (NO. 86-104)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
Petitioners, v. JEWS FOR JESUS, INC., and Alan Howard Snyder, a.k.a. Avi Snyder, Respondents.,
1986 WL 727975, *727975+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 20, 1986) Brief of Airport Operators
Council International (AOCI) as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners, the Board of
Airport Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles, et al. (NO. 86-104) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1395 BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS OF CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Petitioner, v. JEWS
FOR JESUS, INC., Respondent., 1986 WL 727977, *727977+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 20,
1986) Brief for City of St. Louis, Missouri, Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner (NO. 86104)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
Petitioners, v. JEWS FOR JESUS, INC., and Alan Howard Snyder, a.k.a. Avi Snyder, Respondents.,
1986 WL 727978, *727978+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 20, 1986) Brief for the Petitioners (NO.
86-104)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1397 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation, and Department of Water and Power, a
municipal utility, Petitioners, v. PREFERRED COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a California
Corporation, Respondent., 1986 WL 727928, *727928+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 24, 1986) Brief
for Respondent (NO. 85-390) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1398 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, California, et al., Petitioners, v. PREFERRED COMMUNICATIONS,
INC., Respondent., 1986 WL 727921, *727921+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 10, 1986) Brief of the
National Satellite Cable Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent (NO. 85-390)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
municipal utility, Petitioners, v. PREFERRED COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a California
corporation, Respondent., 1986 WL 727919, *727919+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 10, 1986) Brief
for the Petitioners (NO. 85-390) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1400 BETHEL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403; Christy B. Ingle; David C. Rich; J. Bruce Alexander; and
Gerald E. Hosman, Petitioners, v. Matthew N. FRASER, a Minor, and E. L. Fraser, as His Guardian
Ad Litem, Respondents., 1985 WL 667975, *667975 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 27, 1985) Brief of
Petitioners (NO. 84-1667) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
municipal utility, Petitioners, v. PREFERRED COMMUNICATIONS, INC. a California corporation,
Respondent., 1985 WL 669397, *669397+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1985) Brief of Space,
the Satellite Television Industry Association, Inc. as Amicus Curiae (NO. 85-390)
1402 S. Simcha GOLDMAN, Petitioner, v. THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, et. al., Respondent., 1985
WL 669066, *669066+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 22, 1985) Brief of the Rutherford Institute,
the Rutherford Institute of Alabama, the Rutherford Institute of Georgia, the Rutherford
Institute of Minnesota, the Rutherford Institute of Montana the Rutherford ... (NO. 84-1097)
1403 Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., Appellants, v. Stephen J.
ROY, et al., 1985 WL 669030, *669030+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 16, 1985) Brief for the
Appellants (NO. 84-780)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1404 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant, v. THE PUBLIC UTILITIES
COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Toward Utility Rate Normalization,
Consumers Union, Consumer Federation of California, Common Cause of California, California
Public Interest Research Group, California Association of Utility Shareholders, Appellees., 1985 WL
669925, *669925+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 20, 1985) Brief for Appellees Toward Utility Rate??
Normalization, Consumers Union?? Federation of California, Common?? California, and
California Public?? Research Group (NO. 84-1044)
1405 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Toward Utility Rate Normalization, Consumers Union,
Consumer Federation of California, Common Cause of California, California Public Interest
Research Group, and California Association of Utility Shareholders, Appellees., 1985 WL 669892,
*669892+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 30, 1985) Brief of Edison Electric Institute as Amicus
Curiae in Support of Appellant (NO. 84-1044)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1406 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. James Vincent ALBERTINI., 1985 WL 669826,
*669826+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 08, 1985) Reply Brief for the United States (NO. 83-1624) "
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1407 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. James Vincent ALBERTINI, Respondent., 1985 WL
669823, *669823+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 04, 1985) Brief for the Respondent (NO. 83-1624)
"
HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
1408 Robert MCDONALD, Petitioner, v. David I. SMITH, Respondent., 1985 WL 669970, *669970+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 25, 1985) Brief for Respondent (NO. 84-476)
HN: 1,9 (S.Ct.)
1409 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Appellee., 1985 WL 669873, *669873+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Feb 14, 1985) Brief of Edison Electric Institute as Amicus Curiae in Support of the
Jurisdictional Statement (NO. 84-1044)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1410 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. James Vincent ALBERTINI., 1985 WL 669820,
*669820+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 31, 1985) Brief for the United States (NO. 83-1624)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1411 Donald J. DEVINE, Director, Office of Personnel Management, Petitioner, v. NAACP LEGAL
DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC., et al., Respondents., 1985 WL 669054, *669054+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 21, 1985) Brief for the Respondents (NO. 84-312)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 21, 1985) Brief Amicus Curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union
Foundation (NO. 84-312)
HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 21, 1985) Brief of the American Jewish Committee, the National
Council of Jewish Women, the Synagogue Council of America and the Union of American
Hebrew Congregations as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 84-312)
HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, INC., et al., Respondents., 1985 WL 669063, *669063+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 21, 1985) Brief of Amici Curiae National Committee for Responsive
Philanthropy, Independent Sector, the National Black United Fund, the American Jewish
Congress, and the Public Citizen Foundation (NO. 84-312)
DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC., et al., 1984 WL 565622, *565622+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Dec 20, 1984) Brief for the Petitioner (NO. 84-312)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC., et al., 1984 WL 565624, *565624+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Dec 20, 1984) Brief of the United Black Fund of America, American Cancer Society
(District of Columbia Division, Chesapeake-Potomac Area, Montgomery County, and
Northern Virginia Area Office), American Red Cross ... (NO. 84-312) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1417 Michael BENDER, et al., Petitioners, v. THE WILLIAMSPORT AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
1984 WL 565896, *565896+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1984) Brief for Respondent (NO.
84-773)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1418 INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, et al., Petitioners, v. ALLIED
INTERNATIONAL, INC., Respondent., 1981 WL 390104, *390104+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec
23, 1981) Brief Amicus Curiae of Occidental Chemical Company in Support of Respondent
(NO. 80-1663)
1419 Gary E. WIDMAR, et al., Petitioners, v. Clark VINCENT, et al., Respondents., 1981 WL 390024,
*390024+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 01, 1981) Motion of Bible Study, A Student Organization
at the University of Missouri at St. Louis, for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief in
Support of Respondents (NO. 80-689)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1420 Gary E. WIDMAR, et al., Petitioners, v. Clark VINCENT, et al., Respondents., 1981 WL 390010,
*390010+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 08, 1981) Brief of Petitioners (NO. 80-689)
HN: 12
(S.Ct.)
1421 Michael HEFFRON, Secretary and Manager of the Minnesota State Agricultural Society Board of
Managers, et al., Petitioners, v. INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS,
INC., et al., Respondents., 1981 WL 389855, *389855+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 07, 1981) Brief
for the American Civil Liberties Union, the Minnesota Civil Liberties Union, and the National
Council of Churches, Amici Curiae (NO. 80-795)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1422 Michael HEFFRON, et al., Petitioners, v. INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA
CONSCIOUSNESS, INC., Respondents., 1981 WL 389857, *389857 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr
07, 1981) Brief for the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial
Organizations as Amicus Curiae (NO. 80-795)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1423 Michael HEFFRON, et al., Petitioners, v. INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA
CONSCIOUSNESS, INC., et al., Respondents., 1981 WL 389850, *389850+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Apr 06, 1981) Brief of Respondents (NO. 80-795)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1424 HEFFRON, Petitioner, v. INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS,
Respondent., 1981 WL 389861, *389861+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 06, 1981) Brief of Amicus
Curiae (India Cultural Society of New Jersey et al) on Behalf of Respondent (NO. 80-795)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1425 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Appellant, v. COUNCIL OF GREENBURGH CIVIC
ASSOCIATIONS and Saw Mill Valley Civic Association., 1981 WL 389975, *389975+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Mar 1981) Brief for the Appellant (NO. 80-608)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1426 James F. SCHAD, 613 Corporation and Juliette Ann Di Luciano, Appellants, v. BOROUGH OF
MOUNT EPHRAIM, Appellee., 1980 WL 339542, *339542+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 04, 1980)
Brief for Appellants (NO. 79-1640)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1427 Michael HEFFRON, Secretary and Manager of the Minnesota State Agricultural Society Board of
Managers, Harveydale Maruska, President of the Minnesota State Agricultural Society Board of
Managers, the Members of the Board of Managers of the Minnesota Agricultural Society, and
Warren Spannaus, Attorney General of the State of Minnesota, individually and in their official
capacities, Petitioners, v. INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA, 1980 WL 339643,
*339643 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1980) Brief for the State of New York, Amicus Curiae
(NO. 80-795)
1428 METROMEDIA, INC., Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a municipal corporation, and DOES I
through XX, Inclusive, Appellees. Pacific Outdoor Advertising Co., Inc., Appellant, v. The City of
San Diego, a municipal corporation, The City Council of San Diego, Voyd Beights, Zoning
Administrator of the City of San Diego and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Appellees., 1980 WL
339785, *339785+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1980) Brief in Support of Jurisdictional
Statement Filed by Amici Curiae Who Rely on Outdoor Advertising to Communicate (NO. 80-
195)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1429 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. RETAIL STORE EMPLOYEES
UNION, LOCAL 1001, Retail Clerks International Association, AFL-CIO, et al., Respondents., 1980
WL 340061, *340061 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 01, 1980) Brief for the Union (NO. 79-672)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1430 Bernard CAREY, as State's Attorney of Cook County, Illinois, Appellant, v. Roy BROWN, Finley
Campbell, Vicki Campbell, Steve Carl, Joan Raisner, Irma Saucedo, Karen Sholl Weiner, David
Smith, Lawanda Smith, Mark Smith, Juliane Souchek, Branda Stadel Carl, Marsha Vihon, Howard
Weiner, Richard West, and the Committee Against Racism, an unincorporated association, on their
own behalf and on behalf of a class similarly situated, Appellees., 1980 WL 340097, *340097+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 21, 1980) Brief for Appellees (NO. 79-703)
1431 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. RETAIL STORE EMPLOYEES
UNION, LOCAL 1001, Retail Clerks International Association, AFL-CIO, et al., 1980 WL 340060,
*340060+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 26, 1980) Brief for the National Labor Relations Board
(NO. 79-672)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1432 CAREY, Appellant, v. BROWN, Appellee., 1980 WL 340101, *340101+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb
20, 1980) Motion of New England Legal Foundation for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae,
and Brief of Amicus Curiae New England Legal Foundation in Support of Appellant (NO. 79703)
1433 CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE
COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellee., 1979 WL 199993, *199993+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 13, 1979) Brief for Appellee (NO. 79-134)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1434 PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER and Fred Sahadi, Appellants, v. Michael ROBINS, et al.,
Appellees., 1979 WL 199940, *199940+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 1979) Brief of Appellants
(NO. 79-289)
1435 RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Appellee., 1979 WL 199910, *199910+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 30, 1979) Brief of Appellants
(NO. 79-243)
HN: 7 (S.Ct.)
COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellee., 1979 WL 199996, *199996
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 15, 1979) Brief of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Diego Gas
& Electric Company and Southern California Edison Company, as Amici Curiae (NO. 79-134)
COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellee., 1979 WL 199992, *199992+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 14, 1979) Brief for Appellant (NO. 79-134)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1438 Wayne MINNICK, et al., Petitioners, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Respondents., 1979 WL 199594, *199594+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1979) Brief for
Respondents (NO. 79-1213)
Appellees., 1979 WL 199944, *199944+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1979) Brief of Homart
Development Co. as Amicus Curiae (NO. 79-289)
1440 PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER, et al., Appellants, v. Michael ROBINS, et al., Appellees.,
1979 WL 199947, *199947 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1979) Brief Amicus Curiae of the
Taubman Company, Inc. and California Business Properties Association in Support of
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1441 PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER, et al., Appellants, v. Michael ROBINS, et al., Appellees.,
1979 WL 199936, *199936+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 23, 1979) Brief Amicus Curiae in
Support of Appellants' Jurisdictional Statement on Behalf of the Taubman Company, Inc. and
California Business Properties Association (NO. 79-289)
HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
Appellees., 1979 WL 199938, *199938+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 20, 1979) Brief Amici Curiae
on Behalf of Homart Development Co. and Sears, Roebuck and Co. in Support of Appeal (NO.
79-289)
Appellees., 1979 WL 199937, *199937+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 1979) Brief Amicus Curiae of
Pacific Legal Foundation in Support of Appellants (NO. 79-289)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1444 Harold R. BROWN, Secretary of Defense, et al., Petitioners, v. Albert Edward GLINES., 1979 WL
199255, *199255+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 02, 1979) Brief for the Petitioners (NO. 78-1006) "
HN: 9,10,12 (S.Ct.)
1445 Brown v. Glines, 1979 WL 213750, *213750+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 02, 1979) Brief for the
HN: 9,10,12 (S.Ct.)
1446 Bruce BABBITT, Governor of the State of Arizona, et al., Defendant Appellants, Arizona Farm
Bureau Federation, an Arizona corporation, et al., Intervenor Appellants, v. UNITED FARM
WORKERS NATIONAL UNION on behalf of itself and its members, et al., Appellees., 1978 WL
207293, *207293+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 24, 1978) Brief for the Appellants (NO. 78-225)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1447 VILLAGE OF SCHAUMBURG, Petitioner, v. CITIZENS FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT, et
al., Respondents., 1978 WL 206671, *206671 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct Term 1978) Petitioner's
Brief. (NO. 78-1335)
1448 Dr. E. Richard FRIEDMAN, et al., Appellants, v. Dr. N. Jay ROGERS, et al. TEXAS
OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. Dr. N. Jay ROGERS, et al., 1978 WL 206713,
*206713+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 21, 1978) Brief for Appellees (NO. 77-1163, 77-1186)
1449 GANNETT CO., INC., Petitioner, v. Hon. Daniel A. DEPASQUALE, County Court Judge of Seneca
County, New York, et al., Respondents., 1978 WL 207249, *207249+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 14,
1978) Brief of Petitioner (NO. 77-1301) "
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1450 Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation, 1978 WL 223423, *223423+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 27, 1978) Brief for Amici Curiae American Broadcasting
Companies, Inc. CBS Inc. National Association of Broadcasters National Broadcasting
Company, Inc. National Radio Broadcasters Association Public ... (NO. 77-528)
HN: 9
(S.Ct.)
1451 In the Matter of Edna SMITH, Appellant., 1977 WL 189413, *189413+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec
27, 1977) Brief of Appellee (NO. 77-56)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1452 In the Matter of Edna SMITH, Appellant., 1977 WL 189409, *189409+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov
23, 1977) Brief for the Appellant (NO. 77-56)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1453 In the Matter of Edna Smith, 1977 WL 204899, *204899+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 23, 1977)
Brief fort the Appellant (NO. 77-56)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1454 Thomas L. HOUCHINS, Petitioner, v. KQED, INC., et al., Respondents., 1977 WL 189693,
*189693+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 16, 1977) Brief for Respondents KQED, et al (NO. 761310)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1455 Houchins v. KQED, Inc., 1977 WL 205224, *205224+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 16, 1977) Brief
for Respondents KQED, et al. (NO. 76-1310)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1456 LANDMARK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Appellee., 1977 WL 189713, *189713+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 31, 1977) Brief of Appellee
(NO. 76-1450)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1457 Landmark Communications, Inc. v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 1977 WL 205011, *205011+

(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 31, 1977) Brief of Appellee (NO. 76-1450)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1458 Thomas L. HOUCHINS, Sheriff of the County of Alameda, California, Petitioner, v. KQED, INC., et
al., Respondents., 1977 WL 189690, *189690+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 04, 1977) Petitioner's
Opening Brief (NO. 76-1310)
HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
1459 Houchins v. KQED, Inc., 1977 WL 205223, *205223+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 04, 1977)
Petitioner's Opening Brief (NO. 76-1310)
HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
1460 Pandol & Sons v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board, 1976 WL 194440, *194440+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Sep 22, 1976) Appellants' Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. (NO. 75-1754)
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1461 CITY OF MADISON, Joint School District No. 8, City of Madison, Villages of Maple Bluff and
Shorewood Hills, Towns of Madison, Blooming Grove, Fitchburg and Burke and Its Agent the Board
of Education, City of Madison Joint School District No. 8, Appellants, v. WISCONSIN
EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION and Madison Teachers Incorporated, Appellees.,
1976 WL 181428, *181428+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 18, 1976) Brief for the American
Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations as Amicus Curiae (NO. 75-946)
"
HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
1462 City of Madison v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission, 1976 WL 194655, *194655+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 18, 1976) Brief for the American Federation of Labor and Congress
of Industrial Organizations as Amicus Curiae (NO. 75-946) "
HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
1463 CITY OF MADISON, Joint School District No. 8, City of Madison, Villages of Maple Bluff and
Shorewood Hills, Towns of Madison, Blooming Grove, Fitchburg and Burke and its Agent the Board
of Education, City of Madison Joint School District No. 8, Appellants, v. WISCONSIN
EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION and Madison Teachers Incorporated, Appellees.,
1976 WL 181435, *181435+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 16, 1976) Brief Amicus Curiae for the
National Education Association (NO. 75-946)
1464 City of Madison v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission, 1976 WL 194660, *194660+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 16, 1976) Brief Amicus Curiae for the National Education Association
(NO. 75-946)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1465 CITY OF MADISON, Joint School District No. 8, et al., Appellants, v. WISCONSIN
EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION, et al., Appellees., 1976 WL 181431, *181431+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 14, 1976) Brief Amicus Curiae on Behalf of the United States
Conference of Mayors, Urging Reversal (NO. 75-946)
1466 CITY OF MADISON, Joint School District No. 8, et al., Appellants, v. WISCONSIN
EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION, et al., Appellees., 1976 WL 181429, *181429
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 05, 1976) Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief
Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Public Service Research Council, Urging Reversal (NO. 75-946)
1467 Gribbs v. American Mini Theatres, Inc., 1976 WL 194125, *194125+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 02,
1976) Brief of Respondents American Mini Theatres, Inc. and Pussy Cat Theatres of Michigan,
Inc. (NO. 75-312)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1468 James L. BUCKLEY, et al., Appellants, v. Francis R. VALEO, et al., Appellees., 1975 WL 171457,
*171457+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 20, 1975) Brief for Appellees Center for Public Financing
of Elections, Common Cause, League of Women Voters of the United States, et al (NO. 75-436,
75-437)
1469 Scott HUDGENS, an Individual, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Local
315, Retail and Wholesale Department Store Union, AFL-CIO, Respondents., 1975 WL 173748,
*173748+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 10, 1975) Reply Brief for Petitioner (NO. 74-773)
HN:
11 (S.Ct.)
1470 Thomas U. GREER and James R. Schlesinger, Petitioners, v. Benjamin SPOCK, Julius Hobson,
Socialist Workers Party, John Ginaven, Donald Misch, Alan Hardy, and Robert Stanton,
Respondents., 1975 WL 173770, *173770+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 12, 1975) Brief for
1471 Chester MCKINNEY, Petitioner, v. State of Alabama, Respondent., 1975 WL 173436, *173436
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 18, 1975) Brief of Petitioner (NO. 74-532)
1472 VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY, et al., Appellants, v. VIRGINIA CITIZENS
CONSUMER COUNCIL, INC., et al., Appellees., 1975 WL 173827, *173827+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Jul 02, 1975) Brief for Association of National Advertisers, Inc., Amicus Curiae (NO. 74895)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1473 Thomas U. GREER, Commander, Fort Dix Military Reservation, et al., Petitioners, v. Benjamin
SPOCK, et al., 1975 WL 173767, *173767+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 1975) Brief for the
HN: 9,10,11 (S.Ct.)
1474 Bd. of School Com'rs of the City of Indianapolis v. Ja, 1974 WL 186286, *186286+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Nov 25, 1974) Petitioners' Reply Brief (NO. 73-1347)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1475 U.S. v. New Jersey State Lottery Comm'n, 1974 WL 186334, *186334+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct
11, 1974) Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae (NO. 73-1471)
HN: 2
(S.Ct.)
1476 Bd. of School Com'rs of the City of Indianapolis v. Ja, 1974 WL 186284, *186284+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Aug 26, 1974) Brief for the Respondents (NO. 73-1347)
HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
1477 Cantrell v. Forest City Pub. Co., 1974 WL 186103, *186103+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 23, 1974)
Brief for Petitioners (NO. 73-5520)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1478 Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad, 1974 WL 185954, *185954+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug
12, 1974) Brief for Respondents (NO. 73-1004)
HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
1479 American Radio Ass'n v. Mobile S.S. Ass'n, Inc., 1974 WL 185811, *185811+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Aug 08, 1974) Brief for Respondent Robert E. Malone (NO. 73-748)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1480 Bd. of School Com'rs of the City of Indianapolis v. Jacobs, 1974 WL 187557, *187557+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Jul 17, 1974) Brief for the Petitioners (NO. 73-1347) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1481 Alonso v. The State of Georgia, 1974 WL 186270, *186270+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 17, 1974)
Motion to Dismiss or Affirm, with Supporting Brief on Behalf of the State of Georgia (NO. 731322) "
HN: 2,9 (S.Ct.)
1482 Procunier v. Hillery, 1974 WL 185821, *185821+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 11, 1974) Appellants'
Reply Brief (NO. 73-754)
1483 Saxbe v. The Washington Post Co., 1974 WL 186235, *186235+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 08,
1974) Brief for the Respondents (NO. 73-1265)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1484 Pell v. Procunier, 1974 WL 187458, *187458+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 05, 1974) Appellees'
Brief (NO. 73-918) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1485 Saxbe v. Washington Post Co., 1974 WL 187542, *187542+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 04, 1974)
Brief for the Petitioners (NO. 73-1265)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1486 Pell v. Procunier, 1974 WL 185930, *185930+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 07, 1974) Brief of the
Washington Post Company, the Miami Herald Publishing Company, the Minneapolis Star and
Tribune Company, New York News, Inc., and the Times Mirror Company, Amici Curiae, in
Support of ... (NO. 73-918)
1487 Procunter v. Hillery, 1974 WL 185819, *185819+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 1974) Appellants'
Brief (NO. 73-754) "
HN: 9,10,11 (S.Ct.)
1488 Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. Torniilo, 1974 WL 185871, *185871+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28,
1974) Brief of the Washington Post Company, Amicus Curiae, in Support of Reversal (NO. 73797)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1489 Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights, 1973 WL 173813, *173813+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 26,
1973) Brief of Petitioner (NO. 73-328)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1490 Lewis v. City of New Orleans, 1973 WL 171734, *171734+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 10, 1973)
Appellant's Brief (NO. 72-6156)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1491 Lubin v. Panish, 1973 WL 172556, *172556+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 31, 1973) Brief for
HN: 9,12 (S.Ct.)
1492 Bd. of Educ. of Cent. Dist. No. 1 of the towns of Addison v. James, 1972 WL 137535, *137535+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 04, 1972) Brief of Commissioner of Education of the State of New
York, Amicus Curiae (NO. 72-564)
HN: 8 (S.Ct.)
1493 Heller v. People of the State of New York, 1972 WL 137548, *137548+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct
10, 1972) Brief for Respondent (NO. 71-1043)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1494 Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratio Nat., 1972 WL 136091, *136091+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Aug 14, 1972) Brief for Respondent Democratic National Committee (NO. 71-863,
71-864, 71-866)
HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
1495 Post-Newsweek Stations, Capital Area, Inc. v. Business, 1972 WL 136331, *136331+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Jun 12, 1972) Brief for Post-Newsweek Stations, Capital Area, Inc. (NO. 71-865)
1496 Lloyd Corp., Ltd. v. Tanner, 1972 WL 135566, *135566+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 14, 1972)
Petitioner's Reply Brief (NO. 71-492)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1497 Cent. Hardware Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1972 WL 135528, *135528+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 13, 1972)
Petitioner's Reply Brief (NO. 70-223) "
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1498 Lloyd Corp., Ltd. v. Tanner, 1972 WL 135564, *135564+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 02, 1972)
Brief for Petitioner (NO. 71-492) "
HN: 9,11 (S.Ct.)
1499 Healy v. James, 1972 WL 135558, *135558+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 1972) Brief for
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1500 Healy v. James, 1972 WL 135559, *135559+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 1972) Amicus Curiae
Brief of the Board of Trustees, California State Colleges (NO. 71-452)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1501 Colten v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 1972 WL 135550, *135550+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28,
1972) Brief for the Appellant (NO. 71-404)
HN: 7 (S.Ct.)
1502 Roe v. Henry Wade Dist. Atty. of Dallas Co., Texas, 1971 WL 134281, *134281+ (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Oct 19, 1971) Brief for Appellee (NO. 70-18)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1503 Cole v. Richardson, 1971 WL 133462, *133462+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 02, 1971) Brief for the
Appellee (NO. 70-14)
1506 Smith v. Florida, 1971 WL 133180, *133180+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 03, 1971) Brief for the
HN: 2,9 (S.Ct.)
1507 Smith v. Florida, 1971 WL 133288, *133288+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 03, 1971) Brief for the
HN: 2,9 (S.Ct.)
1508 Bd. of Regents of the University of Texas System v. Ne, 1971 WL 133328, *133328+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. May 13, 1971) Brief for Appellant (NO. 70-55)
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1509 Radich v. People of the State of New York, 1971 WL 133049, *133049+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan
07, 1971) Brief of Attorney General of the State of New York as Amicus Curiae in Support of
Appellee (NO. 169)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
Appellee (NO. 169)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
Appellee (NO. 169)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1512 Radich v. The People of the State of New York, 1971 WL 133047, *133047+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Jan 06, 1971) Brief for Appellee (NO. 169) "
HN: 7,9,11 (S.Ct.)
HN: 7,9,11 (S.Ct.)
HN: 7,9,11 (S.Ct.)
1515 Cohen v. California, 1970 WL 122789, *122789+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 19, 1970) Brief of
Appellee. (NO. 70-299)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1516 Cohen v. California, 1970 WL 136796, *136796+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 19, 1970) Brief of
Appellee. (NO. 299)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1517 Cohen v. California, 1970 WL 122788, *122788+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 21, 1970) Brief for
Appellant (NO. 70-299) "
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1518 Cohen v. California, 1970 WL 136795, *136795+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 21, 1970) Brief for
Appellant (NO. 299) "
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1519 Stotland v. Com. of Pennsylvania, 1970 WL 136569, *136569+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 17,
1970) Motion to Affirm and Brief of the City of Philadelphia, (See Footnote on Page 1 of Brief
indicating the interest of the City of Philadelphia in this matter.) (NO. 1267)
HN: 1,9
(S.Ct.)
1520 Cent. Hardware Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1970 WL 122456, *122456+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. 1970) Brief of
Levitz Furniture Corporation as Amicus Curiae in Support of the Position of the Petitioner.
(NO. 70-223)
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1521 Taggart v. Weinacker's, Inc., 1969 WL 119861, *119861+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 31, 1969)
Brief of Respondent (NO. 74) "
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1522 Taggart v. Weinacker's, Inc., 1969 WL 119862, *119862+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 31, 1969)
Motion of Homart Development Co. for Leave to File a Brief as Amicus Curiae and Brief of
Homart Development Co. as Amicus Curiae. (NO. 74) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1523 Bachellar v. Maryland, 1969 WL 120235, *120235+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 27, 1969) Brief for
Petitioner (NO. 729)
1524 Breen v. Selective Service Local Bd. No. 16., 1969 WL 120168, *120168+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Oct 22, 1969) Brief for the Respondents (NO. 65) "
HN: 2,6 (S.Ct.)
1525 O'Leary v. Com. of Kentucky, 1969 WL 120207, *120207+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 13, 1969)
Motion to Dismiss and/or Affirm and. Brief in Support (NO. 526)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1526 Birnbaum v. Illinois, 1969 WL 119879, *119879+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 13, 1969) Reply to
Appellee's Brief in Opposition (NO. 90)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1527 Birnbaum v. The People of the State of Illinois, 1969 WL 119878, *119878+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Jul 16, 1969) Brief for the Appellee in Opposition (NO. 90)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1528 Com. of Massachusetts v. Egleson, 1969 WL 120057, *120057+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 30,
1969) Jurisdictional Statement. (NO. 1335) "

HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1529 Boyle v. Landry, 1969 WL 120247, *120247+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 10, 1969) Brief For
Appellees (NO. 4)
HN: 8 (S.Ct.)
1530 McLaurin v. Burnley, 1968 WL 112494, *112494+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 29, 1968) Reply
Brief of Respondent (NO. 18)
HN: 1,9 (S.Ct.)
1531 Gunn v. University Committee to End the War in Viet Nam, 1968 WL 112490, *112490+ (Appellate
Brief) (U.S. Nov 27, 1968) Appellants' Brief (NO. 7)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1532 Street v. People of the State of New York, 1968 WL 112565, *112565+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct
Appellee (NO. 5)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1533 Sidney STREET, Appellant, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellee., 1968 WL
94381, *94381+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 04, 1968) Brief of Attorney General of the State of
New York as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellee (NO. 5)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1534 Street v. The People of the State of New York, 1968 WL 112563, *112563+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Sep 23, 1968) Brief for Appellees (NO. 5) "
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1535 Presbyterian Church in the U.S. v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Bull Memorial Presbyterian Church, 1968
WL 112656, *112656+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 23, 1968) Brief of Respondents (NO. 71)
1536 Sidney STREET, Appellant, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellees., 1968
WL 94379, *94379+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 23, 1968) Brief for Appellees (NO. 5) "
HN:
11 (S.Ct.)
1537 Street v. The People of the State of New York, 1968 WL 112564, *112564+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Sep 16, 1968) Brief of Amicus Curiae United States Flag Foundation, Inc. (NO. 5) "
HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
1538 Gregory v. City of Chicago, 1968 WL 112639, *112639+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 16, 1968)
Brief for the Respondent. (NO. 60)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1539 Sidney STREET, Appellant, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellee., 1968
WL 94380, *94380+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 16, 1968) Brief of Amicus Curiae United States
Flag Foundation, Inc. (NO. 5) "
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1540 Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 1968 WL 112622, *112622+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 21,
1968) Brief for Respondent. (NO. 42)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1541 Street v. People of the State of New York, 1968 WL 112561, *112561+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug
15, 1968) Brief of Appellant (NO. 5)
1542 Sidney STREET, Appellant, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellee., 1968 WL
94377, *94377+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 15, 1968) Brief of Appellant (NO. 5)
1543 Gregory v. City of Chicago, 1968 WL 112638, *112638+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 29, 1968) Brief
of Appellants (NO. 60)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1544 Tinker v. The Des Moines Independent Community School Dist., 1968 WL 112603, *112603+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 24, 1968) Brief for Respondents (NO. 21)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1545 John F. TINKER and Mary Beth Tinker, Minors, by Their Father and Next Friend, Leonard Tinker,
and Christopher Eckhardt, Minor, by His Father and Next Friend, William Eckhardt, Petitioners, v.
THE DES MOINES INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, the Board of Directors
of the Des Moines Independent Community School District, Ora E. Niffenegger, Mrs. Mary Grefe,
Arthur Davis, L. Robert Keck, George Caudill, John R. Haydon, Merle F. Schlampp, Dwight, 1968
WL 94384, *94384+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 24, 1968) Brief for Respondents (NO. 21)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1546 Tinker v. The Des Moines Independent Community School Dist., 1968 WL 112602, *112602+
(Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 01, 1968) Brief for Petitioners (NO. 21)
1547 John F. TINKER and Mary Beth Tinker, minors, by their father and next friend, Leonard Tinker and
Christopher Eckhardt, minor, by his father and next friend, William Eckhardt, Petitioners, v. THE
DES MOINES INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, the Board of Directors of
the Des Moines Independent Community School District, Ora E. Niffenegger, Mrs. Mary Grefe,
Arthur Davis, L. Robert Keck, George Caudill, John R. Haydon, Merle F. Schlampp, Dwight Davis,
Elmer Betz,, 1968 WL 94383, *94383+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 01, 1968) Brief for Petitioners
(NO. 21)
1548 Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc, 1968 WL 112823,
*112823+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 02, 1968) Brief for the American Retail Federation as
Amicus Curiae (NO. 478) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1549 Amalgamated Food Employees Union local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc, 1968 WL 112821,
*112821+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 31, 1968) Brief for Respondents (NO. 478) "
HN: 10
(S.Ct.)
*113860+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 19, 1967) Brief of Retail Clerks International Association
as Amicus Curiae (NO. 478) "
*113857 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 14, 1967) Brief for Petitioners (NO. 478)
1552 U.S. v. O'Brien, 1967 WL 113811, *113811+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 01, 1967) Brief for the
United States (NO. 232, 233)
1553 John Earl CAMERON, et al., Appellants, v. Paul JOHNSON, etc., et al., 1967 WL 129648,
*129648+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 30, 1967) Brief for Appellants on Appeal from the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Hattiesburg Division (NO. 699) "
HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
1554 Sibron v. New York, 1967 WL 113673, *113673+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 28, 1967) Brief for
Respondents (NO. 63)
1555 Zwickler v. Koota, 1967 WL 113590, *113590+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 25, 1967) Brief of
National District Attorneys Association, As Amicus Curiae, In Support of Appellee (NO. 29) "
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1556 Turner v. The People of the State of New York, 1967 WL 113933, *113933+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Mar 25, 1967) Respondent's Brief (NO. 399) "
HN: 9,11 (S.Ct.)
1557 Turner v. The People of the State of New York, 1967 WL 113932, *113932+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S.
Feb 27, 1967) Brief for Petitioners (NO. 399)
HN: 3,9 (S.Ct.)
1558 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lucy MILLAN-FERRER, DefendantAppellant, Josefina Pantoja-Oquendo, Defendant-Appellant, Amparo Fidalgo-Munoz, DefendantAppellant., 2002 WL 34229461, *34229461+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Oct 25, 2002) Brief for
Appellee (NO. 01-1794, 01-1795, 01-1796)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1559 Richard Max STRAHAN, Appellant - Plaintiff, v. Paul FRAZIER, et al., Appellees - Defendants.,
2002 WL 34231755, *34231755 (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jun 05, 2002) Appellants' Brief on
Appeal (NO. 01-2290)
1560 Douglas E. YEO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE TOWN OF LEXINGTON, et al., DefendantsAppellees., 1997 WL 33771231, *33771231+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jul 28, 1997) En Banc
Brief of Defendants-Appellees (NO. 96-1623)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1561 Seth BERNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas E. DELAHANTY, II, Defendant-Appellee., 1997 WL
34650826, *34650826+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jan 17, 1997) Appellee's Brief (NO. 96-2122)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1562 GLOBE NEWSPAPER COMPANY, New Boston Group., Inc., New York Times Company, Dow
Jones & Co., Inc., Gannett Satellite, Information Network, Inc., and TAB Communications, Inc.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BEACON HILL ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION, DefendantAppellant., 1996 WL 34406948, *34406948 (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Apr 01, 1996) Supplemental
Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellees Globe Newspaper Company, et al. (NO. 94-1538)
1563 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS, et al., v. John B. HARWOOD, et al., 1995
WL 17829212, *17829212+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. May 10, 1995) Brief of Defendants /
HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
1564 JEWS FOR JESUS, INC. and Steven Silverstein, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MASSACHUSETTS BAY
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellant., 1992 WL 12575606, *12575606+
(Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jul 23, 1992) Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellees (NO. 92-1277) "
HN:
7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
1565 JEWS FOR JESUS, INC. and Steven Silverstein, Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. MASSACHUSETTS BAY
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Defendant, Appellant., 1992 WL 12575605, *12575605+
(Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jun 22, 1992) Brief For Defendant, Appellant (NO. 92-1277)
HN:
10 (S.Ct.)
1566 Michael H. SUSSMAN, Bennett Weiss, Maury Knight, and Democratic Alliance of Orange County,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Brian A. CRAWFORD, Garrison Commander, and United States Military
Academy at West Point, Defendants-Appellees., 2008 WL 7782583, *7782583+ (Appellate Brief)
(2nd Cir. Mar 04, 2008) Brief for Defendants-Appellees (NO. 07-2171-CV)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1567 Sal CELAURO Jr; Paul S. Astrup; and Rosanne B. Astrup, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES; Internal
Revenue Service; Lawrence Engel individually and in his official capacity; Smith's Aerospace, Inc.;
Teacher's Federal Credit Union; and DCS Transport & Logistics Solutions, Appellees., 2006 WL
4901174, *4901174+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. May 17, 2006) Brief for Pro-Se PlaintiffAppellants (NO. 06-0984-CV)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1568 Robert L. SCHULZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES; Internal Revenue Service; and Anthony
Roundtree, Appellees., 2006 WL 4845793, *4845793+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Mar 24, 2006)
Brief on Behalf of Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 06-0075-CV)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1569 David W. HASSIG, Donald L. Hassig, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NYS DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, John Cahill, Individually and as Commissioner of the New
York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Larry Johnson, Picotte Companies, Thomas
P. Mccarville, Defendants-Appellees; John Doe 1, Defendant., 2004 WL 3756910, *3756910+
(Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 30, 2004) Brief and Special Appendix for State DefendantsAppellees (NO. 04-1773-CV)
1570 David W. HASSIG and Donald L. Hassig, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NEW YORK STATE
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, John P. Cahill, Individually and as
Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Larry Johnson,
Picotte Companies, Thomas P. McCarville, Defendants-Appellees; John Doe I, Defendant,, 2004 WL
3756909, *3756909+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 24, 2004) Brief for Defendants-Appellees
(NO. 04-1773)
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1571 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. John MURTARI, Defendant-Appellant., 2004 WL
3417660, *3417660+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug 26, 2004) Brief for the United States of
America (NO. 03-1619) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1572 Robert L. SCBUTZ Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IRS, United States, Anthony Roundtree, DefendantsAppellees., 2004 WL 3760641, *3760641+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug 04, 2004) Brief for ProSe Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 4-0196-CV103-CV-1354, LEAD)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1573 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. John MURTARI, Defendant-Appellant., 2004 WL
3417661, *3417661+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jun 25, 2004) Brief and Special Appendix for
Defendant-Appellant (NO. 03-1619)

HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1574 Scott HUMINSKI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RUTLAND CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Rutland
County Sheriff's Department, State of Vermont, Nancy Corsones, Vermont District Court Judge,
Karen Predom, Vermont State Police, Unnamed Vermont State Police Officer, Rutland District
Court, R.J. Elrick, Deputy Sheriff, S. Schutt, Deputy Sheriff, Robert Emerick, Officer, M. Patricia
Zimmerman, Hon. Judge, Bennington County Sheriff's Dept., Gary Forrest, Sheriff, and City of,
2004 WL 2399093, *2399093+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Apr 14, 2004) Appellant's Brief (NO.
99-9329)
HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1575 Mary D. DORMAN, Troy Gustavson and Joseph Townsend, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. Bernadette
CASTRO, individually and in her official capacity, Rai Dobbins, individually and in his official
capacity, Walter Buhner, Sergeant, individually and in his official capacity an Edward Powers, Police
Officer, individually and in his official capacity Defendants - Appellees., 2003 WL 23475682,
*23475682+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jun 02, 2003) Brief for Defendants-Appellees (NO. 029026)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1576 Scott HUMINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Hon. Nancy CORSONES, Hon. M.
Patricia Zimmerman, and Karen Preedom, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, Sheriff R.J.
Elrick and Rutland County Sheriff's Department, Defendants-Appellees., 2003 WL 25656255,
*25656255+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Apr 07, 2003) Brief for Defendants-Appellees Sheriff R.J.
Elrick and Rutland County Sheriff's Department (NO. 02-6201, LEAD)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1577 Scott HUMINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Hon. Nancy CORSONES, Hon. Patricia
Zimmerman, Karen Predom Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, Sheriff R. J. Elrick and
Rutland County Sheriff's Department Defendants-Appellees., 2003 WL 25296071, *25296071+
(Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Apr 02, 2003) Brief for Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant Karen
Predom (NO. 02-6150XAP02-6199XAP) "
HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
1578 MAKE THE ROAD BY WALKING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, Irania Sanchez and Emilio Vega, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Jason A. TURNER, as Administrator of the
Human Resources Administration of the City of New York, Defendant-Appellee., 2003 WL
24136200, *24136200+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jan 13, 2003) Brief for Defendant-Appellee
(NO. 02-7876)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1579 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK and
Henry J. Stern, Commissioner of the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation,
Defendants-Appellants., 2002 WL 32879666, *32879666+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Oct 09, 2002)
Appellants' Brief (NO. 02-794(L)02-9012) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1580 HOTEL EMPLOYEES & RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES UNION, Local 100 of New York, N.y. &
Vicinity, Afl-Cio, Henry J. Tamarin, as President and Dennis Diaz, as agent thereof, PlaintiffsAppellees, v. CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION, Henry J. Stern,
as Commissioner, Robert Lawson, as Director of Special Events for Manhattan, Lincoln Center for
the Performing Arts, Inc., Defendants-Appellees., 2001 WL 34368874, *34368874+ (Appellate
Brief) (2nd Cir. Nov 19, 2001) Brief for Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, Inc.,
Defendant-Appellee (NO. 01-7602)
1581 HOTEL EMPLOYEES AND RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES UNION, Local 100 Of The City of
New York, N.y., & Vicinity, Afl-Cio, Henry J. Tamarin as President and Dennis Diaz, as agent
thereof, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PARKS &
RECREATION, Henry Stern, as Commissioner, Robert Lawson, as Director of Special Events for
Manhattan, Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, Inc., as age thereof, Nathan Leventhal, as
President and Evelyn Finkelstein,, 2001 WL 34368872, *34368872+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Oct
22, 2001) Brief for City Appellees (NO. 01-7602)
1582 THE BRONX HOUSEHOLD OF FAITH; Jack Roberts; Robert Hall, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.
COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 10; Charles Williams, in his official capacity as President
of the Board of Education for Community School Board District No. 10; The Board of Education of
the City of New York, Defendants-Appellees., 1997 WL 33774079, *33774079+ (Appellate Brief)
(2nd Cir. Feb 06, 1997) Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 96-9633)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1583 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by G. Oliver Koppell, Attorney General of the State of
New York, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OPERATION RESCUE NATIONAL, also known as Operation
Rescue; Keith Tucci; Youth for America; Missionaries to the Pre-Born; Joseph Foreman; John &
Jane Does; Patrick Mahoney; B.O.R.N., Defendants, Randall Terry, Defendant-Appellant., 1994 WL
16181507, *16181507+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. May 12, 1994) Brief for Plaintiff-Appellee
(NO. 94-7213)
1584 HAITIAN CENTERS COUNCIL, INC., et al., Plaintiff-Appellees, v. Gene McNARY,
Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service, et al., Defendant-Appellants., 1992 WL
12024986, *12024986+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. May 05, 1992) Brief for Appellants (NO. 926090)
1585 HAITIAN CENTERS COUNCIL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Gene McNARY,
Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service, et al., Defendants-Appellants., 1992 WL
12024990, *12024990+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. May 05, 1992) Brief of Amicus Curiae
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees
(NO. 92-6090)
1586 Noel MULLEN, a minor, et al., Appellants, v. John W. THOMPSON, et al., Appellees., 2001 WL
34554615, *34554615+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. 2001) Brief of Appellants (NO. 01-3158) "
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1587 Nicholas STORTI and Michael Perez, a Minor, by and Through His Father and Natural Guardian,
George Perez, Appellants, v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY and John K. Leary, Appellees., 2000 WL 33993747, *33993747+ (Appellate Brief)
(3rd Cir. Apr 16, 2000) Brief of Appellants (NO. 99-1795)
HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1588 CYBER PROMOTIONS, INC., v. AMERICA ONLINE INCORPORATED, America Online, Inc.,
Appellant. (96-1811) America Online, Inc., Appellant, v. Cyber Promotions, Inc. (96-1812), 1996
WL 33656529, *33656529+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Sep 20, 1996) Brief of Appellant, America
Online, Inc. (NO. 96-1811, 96-1812)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1589 Daniel D. RAPPA, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kermit D. JUSTICE, individually, and Mark A.
Mcnulty, acting Secretary of the Delaware Department of Transportation, in his official capacity.,
Defendants-Appellants., 1992 WL 12133411, *12133411+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Aug 28, 1992)
Brief for Appellee (NO. 92-7293)
HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1590 Diana DURAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Linda NITSCHE, Kenneth Swart, Roy C. Claypool, Dr.
Terrance Furin, Sharon Keith-Hopper and Members of the Owen J. Roberts School Board,
Defendants - Appellees., 1992 WL 12131560, *12131560+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Mar 25, 1992)
Brief of the Appellees (NO. 91-2058)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1591 Richard R. KREIMER, Plaintiff, v. BUREAU OF POLICE FOR THE TOWN OF MORRISTOWN,
et al., Defendants. Trustees for the Morristown and Morris Township Free Public Library,
Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, v. Travelers Insurance Company, and Travelers Indemnity Company,
Third Party Defendants., 1991 WL 11247015, *11247015+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Aug 12, 1991)
Brief on Behalf of Defendants the Joint Free Public Library of Morristown and Morris
Township (NO. 91-5501)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1592 Rebecca WILLIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TOWN OF MARSHALL, North Carolina, Defendant Appellee., 2004 WL 3200529, *3200529+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. May 14, 2004) Brief of
Appellee (NO. 03-2252(L)04-1240) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1593 David LYTLE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Jack DOYLE, Commonwealth's Attorney for the City
of Norfolk, et al., Defendants-Appellants., 2002 WL 32737315, *32737315+ (Appellate Brief) (4th
Cir. Apr 10, 2002) Brief of Appellants (NO. 02-1056, 02-1076)

HN: 2 (S.Ct.)
1594 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Joseph Richard PERRY, Jr., Appellant., 2001 WL
34113377, *34113377+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Feb 01, 2001) Brief for the United States (NO.
00-4059-LCONSW/00-43)
1595 WEIS MARKETS, INC. t/a Mr. Z's Food Mart, Petitioner-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. NATIONAL
LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, United Food and
Commercial Workers Union, Local 72, Intervenor., 1998 WL 34084129, *34084129+ (Appellate
Brief) (4th Cir. Nov 24, 1998) Reply Brief of Petitioner-Appellant/Cross-Appellee (NO. 98-1892,
98-2017XAP)
1596 Rita WARREN, Appellant, v. FAIRFAX COUNTY, Appellee., 1998 WL 34097965, *34097965+
(Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Mar 19, 1998) Appellee's Brief (NO. 98-1059)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1597 Margaret BORING, Appellant, v. THE BUNCOMBE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION;
Charles Johnson, Chairman; Michael Anders; Terry Roberson; Bruce Goforth; Bill Williams; Grace
Brazil; Wendell Begley; Dr. J. Frank Yeager, Superintendent; and Fred Ivey, Principal, each in
his/her individual and official capacity, Appellees., 1996 WL 33453573, *33453573+ (Appellate
Brief) (4th Cir. Dec 11, 1996) Brief of Appellees (NO. 95-2593)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1598 Margaret BORING, Appellant, v. THE BUNCOMBE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION;
Charles Johnson, Chairman; Michael Anders; Terry Roberson; Bruce Goforth; Bill Williams; Grace
Brazil; Wendell Begley; Dr. J. Frank Yeager, Superintendent; and Fred Ivey, Principal, each in
his/her individual and official capacity, Appellees., 1996 WL 33453575, *33453575+ (Appellate
Brief) (4th Cir. Jan 11, 1996) Brief of Appellees (NO. 95-2593) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1599 MULTIMEDIA PUBLISHING COMPANY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., and the New York
Times Company, Appellees, v. GREENVILLE-SPART ANBURG AIRPORT DISTRICT, and Gary
Jackson, in his Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Greenville-Spartanburg Airport
Commission, Appellants., 1991 WL 11246212, *11246212+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jul 31, 1991)
Brief of Appellants (NO. 91-1575) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1600 UNITED MILITARY ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellant, v. Honorable Clifford ALEXANDER, et al.,
Appellee., 1978 WL 222015, *222015+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jul 03, 1978) Brief for Appelles
(NO. 78-1205)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1601 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, Local 5, Tomasa Compean, and Austraverta
Rodriguez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF HOUSTON, Defendant-Appellee., 2009 WL 6445819,
*6445819+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Feb 10, 2009) Brief of Appellee (NO. 08-20616)
1602 Paul T. PALMER, by and through his parents and legal guardians, Paul D. Palmer and Susan
Gonzalez Baker, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAXAHACHIE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,
Defendant-Appellee., 2008 WL 6969002, *6969002+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 23, 2008) Brief
Amicus Curiae of the American Center for Law and Justice Urging Reversal in Support of
Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 08-10903)
1603 Doug MORGAN; Robin Morgan; Jim Shell; Sunny Shell; Sherrie Versher; and Christine Wade,
Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross Appellees, v. PLANO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,
Defendant-Appellee-Cross Appellant, Lynn Swanson, in her individual capacity and as Principal of
Thomas, Elementary School; and JACKIE BOMCHILL, in her individual capacity and as Principal
of Rasor Elementary School, Defendants-Appellants., 2008 WL 7783203, *7783203+ (Appellate
Brief) (5th Cir. Nov 05, 2008) Brief Amicus Curiae of the American Center for Law and Justice
In Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 08-40707)
1604 John T. NETHERLAND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF ZACHARY, LOUISIANA, et al,
Defendants-Appellants., 2008 WL 5940987, *5940987+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Apr 30, 2008)
Brief of Louisiana Municipal Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellant, City of
Zachary, to Reverse the Ruling of the District Court (NO. 08-30047)
1605 WHITE BUFFALO VENTURES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT

AUSTIN, Defendant - Appellee., 2004 WL 2402504, *2402504+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Oct 04,
2004) Brief of Appellee (NO. 04-50362)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1606 Jack FINGER; Nazirite Ruben Flores Perez; Tim Bushacker; Ron Schultz; James Langford; Charles
Elley; Milliam Manuel; David Benavides; Eloise Benavides; Andrea Barlow, Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v. Ed GARZA, Mayor, City of San Antonio, Individually and in his official capacity; City of San
Antonio, Texas, Defendants - Appellees., 2004 WL 5763762, *5763762+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir.
Mar 15, 2004) Brief of Appellees (NO. 03-51282)
1607 Celia J. CHIU, Denise Brown, Veronica C. Jenkins, Denise Kirke, Alfred G. Kirke, and Kenneth R.
Johnson, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. PLANO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; ET.AL.,
Defendants, James Davis, Dr. Plano Independent School District Central Cluster Area Assistant
Superintendent; Corky Criswell, Principal, Hendrick Middle School Defendants/Appellants., 2002
WL 32392090, *32392090+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 30, 2002) Brief of Appellees (NO. 0241218)
1608 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Respondent, v. Jamie PERKINS, Defendant Petitioner., 2002 WL 32713914, *32713914 (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Sep 24, 2002) Petitioner's
Brief (NO. 02-10329) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1609 Bret CAHILL, Former Employees, Job Seekers & Other Citizens of the State of Texas, Plaintiff Appellant, v. State of Texas; Mike Sheridan, Jointly and Severally, Defendants - Appellees., 2002
WL 32129435, *32129435+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jul 24, 2002) Reply Brief of the Appellant
(NO. 02-40462)
1610 Bret CAHILL, Former Employees, Job Seekers & Other Citizens of the State of Texas, Plaintiff Appellant, v. STATE OF TEXAS; Mike Sheridan, Jointly and Severally, Defendants - Appellees.,
2002 WL 32129434, *32129434+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jul 08, 2002) Appellees' Brief (NO.
00-40462)
1611 Roberto S. VASQUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, Jesus DE LA O, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOUSING
AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF EL PASO, Defendant-Appellee., 2002 WL 32103489,
*32103489+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jul 03, 2002) Supplemental Brief of Appellee (NO. 0050702)
HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
1612 Yoram RAZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. R. OAKES; Ted Barbe; Julia E. Brewer; Cook, Yancey, King
& Galloway; Norman Moore; U. S. Marshal Service; Karla Cooper; and, Michael J. Moriarty,
Defendants-Appellees., 2002 WL 32179762, *32179762+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Apr 11, 2002)
Brief of Defendants-Appellees J. R. Oakes; Ted Barbe; U. S. Marshal Service; Karla Cooper;
and, Michael J. Moriarty (NO. 02-30054)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1613 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Respondent, v. Jamie PERKINS, Defendant Petitioner., 2002 WL 32304454, *32304454 (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. 2002) Petitioner's Brief
(NO. 02-10329) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1614 Tom FIESEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dessie F. CHERRY, individually and in her official capacity as
Senior Warden I, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2001 WL
34110297, *34110297+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Oct 05, 2001) Brief of Defendants-Appellees
(NO. 01-20142)
1615 George Vernon CHILES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Linda Faith ALLMAND, Fort Worth Public Library
Foundation, City of Fort Worth, Texas, Defendants - Appellees., 2000 WL 34215664, *34215664+
(Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jul 24, 2000) Brief of Appellee (NO. 00-10426)
HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
1616 Paul BIGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Laddie HUFFMAN, Sheriff of Clay County, Mississippi, in
His Official and Individual Capacities, Defendant-Appellee., 2000 WL 34215780, *34215780+
(Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Mar 08, 2000) Brief of Appellee (NO. 99-60724)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1617 Bret CAHILL, Former Employees, Job Seekers & Other Citizens of the State of Texas, Plaintiff -
Appellant, v. State of Texas; Mike Sheridan, Jointly and Severally, Defendants - Appellees., 2000
WL 34034079, *34034079+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. 2000) Appellees' Brief (NO. 00-40903)
1618 Robert BRISTER, et al., Plaintiff-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. Larry R. FAULKNER, in His
Official Capacity as President of the University of Texas at Austin; et al., Defendants-AppellantsCross-Appellees., 1999 WL 33612615, *33612615+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jul 23, 1999) Brief
of Appellants (NO. 99-50254)
HN: 12 (S.Ct.)
1619 Terry KIRKENDALL, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Hector LARA, Tom Robbins Calvin Kessler,
Yvette Colescott Haran Kurt G. Paxon, Dale Rugge, Grambling and Mounce El Paso Apartment
Association, and Judge Herb Cooper, Defendants - Appellees., 1992 WL 12130263, *12130263+
(Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jun 25, 1992) Brief for Defendant - Appellee Judge Cooper (NO. 928140)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1620 Dr. Ezzat Majd POUR, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL LICENSURE BOARD, et
Al, Defendants/Appellees., 1990 WL 10084803, *10084803+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Mar 23,
1990) Brief Op the Plaintiff/Appellant (NO. 89-04913)
HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1621 Cliff R. PORTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, et. al., Defendant-Appellees.,
2009 WL 4831975, *4831975+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Dec 02, 2009) Brief of PlaintiffApplellant Cliff R. Porter (NO. 09-4274) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1622 Andrew P. GROSJEAN; Glenda K. Grosjean, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SHARON BOMMARITO;
Maureen Michalski; Narvie Twyman, in their official and individual capacities, DefendantsAppellees., 2008 WL 3973280, *3973280+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. May 16, 2008) Defendantsappellee's/cross-appellants' Final Brief On Appeal (NO. 07-2052, 07-2102)
1623 Robert KINKUS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE, et al., DefendantsAppellants., 2007 WL 5066222, *5066222+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Dec 17, 2007) Final Brief of
Defendants-Appellants James Popp And Gary Anderson (NO. 07-3483)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1624 S.H.A.R.K., et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. METRO PARKS SERVING SUMMIT COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants/Appellees., 2007 WL 1706365, *1706365+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Feb 22, 2007)
Final Brief of Defendants/Appellees Anthony Denicola and White Buffalo, Inc. (NO. 06-4009)
HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
1625 UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 1099, et al., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. SOUTHWEST OHIO REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellant., 1998 WL
35161722, *35161722+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Mar 03, 1998) Final Brief of Appellee (NO. 974126)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1626 MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION, itself and on behalf of its members, Mark
Zidek, and Ilir Sino, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. David A. CLARKE, Jr., Edward Bailey, and Milwaukee
County, Defendants-Appellants., 2008 WL 2329564, *2329564+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. May 23,
2008) Brief for Amicus Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State on Behalf
of Plaintiffs-appellees and in Support of Affirmance (NO. 08-1515)
1627 Deborah A. MAYER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONROE COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOL
CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2006 WL 2024105, *2024105+ (Appellate Brief)
(7th Cir. Jun 29, 2006) Brief for the Plaintiff-Appellant Deborah A. Mayer (NO. 06-1993)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1628 Gail ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MILWAUKEE COUNTY and Milwaukee Transport
Services, Inc. Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 3950440, *3950440 (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. May
2005) Brief and Attached Appendix of Defendants-Appellees Milwaukee County and
Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc. (NO. 05-1267)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1629 Ralph OVADAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MADISON, Wisconsin, Richard Williams, Chris
Paulson and Patrick Grady, Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 5806887, *5806887+ (Appellate Brief)
(7th Cir. Feb 04, 2005) Brief of Defendants-Appellees (NO. 04-4030)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1630 Michael MASSEY and Mickey Mills, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mable JOHNSON, Dean of
Vincennes University Aircraft Technology Center in Her Individual & Official Capacities; James
Messmer, Vice President of Vincennes University, in His Individual & Official Capacity; Gazella
Summitt, Human Relations Director of Vincennes University in Her Individual & Official Capacity,
Defendant-Appellee., 2005 WL 3749430, *3749430+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. 2005) PlaintiffsAppellants' Brief & Short Appendix (NO. 05-2972)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1631 THE WORLDWIDE STREET PREACHERS' FELLOWSHIP, Ron McRae, Daniel Gowan, Stephen
McRae, Bruce Perrault, and Kevin Deegan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bart PETERSON, in his official
capacity as Mayor of the City of Indianapolis, Indiana, et al., Defendants - Appellees., 2004 WL
3759064, *3759064+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. 2004) Brief of Appellees (NO. 04-2255) "
HN: 9,11 (S.Ct.)
1632 LOCAL UNION NO. 34, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Mike Sullivan, Don
Funk, and Darrell Moody, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Paul BAZZANO, George Tegard, and Other
Unknown Members of the Department of Police of the City of Peoria, and the City of Peoria, a
Municipal Corporation, Defendants-Appellees., 1994 WL 16045236, *16045236 (Appellate Brief)
(7th Cir. 1994) Brief of the Appellees (NO. 94-2772) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1633 Harlan L. JACOBSEN, DBA Country Singles, Singles Scene, and Jacobsen Distribution, PlaintiffAppellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, State of Iowa; Steven F. McMenamin, Rest
Area Administrator, in that capacity and as an individual; Will Zitterich, Office of Maintenance, Dot,
in that capacity and as an individual; and Thomas J. Vilsack, Governor, in that capacity and as an
Individual; Mark Hunacek, as an Individual, Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 5627853, *5627853+
(Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Jan 14, 2005) Appellees' Brief and Argument (NO. 04-3716)
HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1634 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. HEARN CONSTRUCTION,
Respondent., 2009 WL 4248771, *4248771+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Nov 04, 2009) Motion to
Substitute Attached Amended Opening Brief for Initial Opening Brief Filed Oct. 19, 2009 (NO.
09-72387)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1635 Alicia UNGER, Plaintiff / Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants / Appellees.,
2009 WL 6303855, *6303855+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 09, 2009) Appellees' Answering
Brief (NO. 09-55375)
HN: 2,10 (S.Ct.)
1636 Ray HRDLICKA, an individual, and Crime, Justice & America, Inc., a California Corporation,
Appellants, v. Perry L. RENIFF, in his official capacity of Sheriff of the County of Butte, California,
Appellee., 2009 WL 2776408, *2776408+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jun 30, 2009) Appellee's
Answering Brief (NO. 09-15768)
HN: 7,10 (S.Ct.)
1637 NORTH PACIFICA LLC, Plaintiffs/Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. CITY OF PACIFICA, et al.,
Defendants/Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2007 WL 2195654, *2195654+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir.
Jun 12, 2007) Appellant/Cross-Appellee City of Pacifica's (Replacement) Reply/Response Brief
(NO. 05-16069, 05-16146)
HN: 8 (S.Ct.)
1638 Robert L. SCHULZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES; Internal Revenue Service; and Anthony
Roundtree, Appellees., 2006 WL 2983610, *2983610+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 27, 2006)
Brief on Behalf of Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 05-17388)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1639 LOCAL JOINT EXECUTIVE BOARD OF LAS VEGAS, Culinary Workers Union Local 226, and
Bartenders Union, Local 165, Afl-Cio, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent., 2005 WL 4669041, *4669041+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Dec 09, 2005) Petitioners'
Opening Brief (NO. 05-75515) "
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1640 Kimberly JACOBS, Individually and Through Her Parents and Next Friends, Donald Jacobs and
Linda Rowley; Donald Jacobs and Linda Rowley Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor
Daughter, Kimberly Jacobs; Dwight Terry Jr., Individually and Through His Father and Next Friend,
Dwight Terry; Dwight Terry Individually and on Behalf of His Minor Son Dwight Terry Jr.; Shane
Dresser, Individually and Through His Parents and Next Friends, Donald Dresser and Wendy, 2005
WL 4147043, *4147043+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 27, 2005) Plaintiffs/Appellants' Opening
Brief (NO. 05-16434)
1641 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEVADA, Gary Peck, Unitarian Universalist Social
Justice Committee, and Paul R. Brown, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. THE CITY OF LAS
VEGAS, Oscar Goodman, in his official capacity as the Mayor, The Fremont Street Limited
Liability Corp., and Joseph Schillaci, in his official capacity as President The Fremont Street Limited
Liability Corp., Appellees/Cross-Appellants., 2005 WL 3128165, *3128165+ (Appellate Brief) (9th
Cir. Jul 18, 2005) Appellees'/Cross-Appellants' Answering/Opening Brief (NO. 05-15767, 0515667)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1642 Manuel GONGORA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dora SCHRIRO, director Arizona Department of
Corrections, et alia, Respondents-Appellees., 2004 WL 3830726, *3830726+ (Appellate Brief) (9th
Cir. Aug 09, 2004) Appellants Opening Brief (NO. 04-16052)
HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1643 Alpheus Ray BROKAW, Appellant, v. QUALCOMM, INCORPORATED, et al, Appellee., 2004 WL
1810196, *1810196+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 01, 2004) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 0455198)
HN: 8 (S.Ct.)
1644 Dan MCCULLOUGH, Eric Milton, Christine Reeves, Myh Vo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Jeffrey
CORNEJO, Long Beach Unified School District, Defendant-Appellants., 2004 WL 443443,
*443443+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jan 23, 2004) Brief of Appellants (NO. 03-57200) "
HN:
9,10 (S.Ct.)
1645 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross Appellant, v. John A. LENCE,
Defendant-Appellant/Cross Appellee., 2003 WL 22670026, *22670026+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir.
May 15, 2003) Brief of Appellant (NO. 02-30420, 03-30014)
HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1646 Pamelyn VLASAK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, for the County
of Los Angeles, Respondent-Appellee., 2002 WL 32103377, *32103377+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir.
Nov 06, 2002) Appellee's Brief (NO. 02-55977)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1647 PRISON LEGAL NEWS, Michael Tucker, Mark Wilson, and Hung Le, Appellants, v. David S.
COOK, Director of the Oregon Department of Corrections, David Schumacher, Rules/Compliance
Manager of the Oregon Department of Corrections, and Jane and John Does 1-10, Officers and
Agents of the Oregon Department of Corrections, Appellees., 2000 WL 33980883, *33980883+
(Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 05, 2000) Appellee's Brief (NO. 99-36084)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1648 John La VOIE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF TUCSON, City of Tucson Police Department;
Officer Van Norman, Lieutenant Miller, Officer Lara, Officer Silva, all police officers of the City of
Tucson Arizona Board of Regents, University of Arizona; Steve Brigham, Lieutenant Ragland,
employees of the University of Arizona University Medical Center, and Roger Lovstrom, and
Employee., 1999 WL 33623255, *33623255 (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 27, 1999) Reply Brief
(NO. 99-15223)
1649 Marcie CAVANAGH, Kevin Bundy, Johanna Henry, Scott Kravitz, William Morris, Priscilla
Thomas, Derik Veenhuis, Naomi Wagner and Elena Zunigia, for themselves and others similarly
situated, as a class, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HUMBOLDT COUNTY, California; Dennis Lewis,
Sheriff; Lt. Gary Philp; Deputies Greg Busey, Pete Jimenez; (FNU) McCollister; (FNU) Wharton
and John Does 1-X (H.C.S.D.); California Highway Patrol Officers Ron Keller, J. Latham, (Estate
of) M., 1999 WL 33629677, *33629677+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 09, 1999) County and City
Defendants'-Appellees' Brief (NO. 99-15568)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1650 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone James ANTONE, DefendantAppellant., 1999 WL 33627342, *33627342+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 06, 1999) Appellant's
Opening Brief (NO. CA-99-10160)
1651 John E. WOLFGRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF, Deputy Badge

No. 222; El Dorado County Sheriff; Federal Protective Service Officers Badge No. 215, 689, and
1135, the United States of America, and Does 1-15, Defendants-Appellees., 1999 WL 33652412,
*33652412+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. May 26, 1999) Brief for Appellees Federal Protective
Service Officers and the United States of America (NO. 98-16892)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1652 R. Charles BRYFOGLE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Robert D. LITTLE, et al., Defendants/Appellees.,
1999 WL 33654695, *33654695+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Apr 26, 1999) Answering Brief of
Appellees City of Tucson, Garcia, and Berning (NO. 98-17438)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1653 Janette HOPPER and Sharon Rupp, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF PASCO, et al.,
Defendants/Appellees., 1999 WL 33651514, *33651514+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Apr 02, 1999)
Appellees' Brief (NO. 98-35795)
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
.... John LA VOIE, Appellant, v. James HEDRICK, et al., Appellees. (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Dec 14,
1998) Appellees' Answering Brief (NO. 98-16700)
(Text not available on WESTLAW)
.... John LA VOIE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. James HEDRICK, Roger Carrillo, City of Tucson, Steve
Montano, Major Bosner, Prozak, Clarence Dupnik, Pima County, Pima County Sheriff's Department,
Pima County Adult Detention Center. (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Nov 16, 1998) Opening Brief (NO.
98-16700)
(Text not available on WESTLAW)
1656 Susan COFFEY et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. PIERCE COUNTY et al., Defendants/Appellees.,
1998 WL 34088127, *34088127+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 14, 1998) Brief of Appellees (NO.
98-35111, 98-35143)
1657 LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR SURVIVAL; Los Angeles Coalition To End Hunger and
Homelessness; and Jerry Rubin, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Richard
Riordan, Mayor of the City of Los Angeles, in his official capacity; Chief Bernard Parks, in his
official capacity, Defendants-Appellants., 1998 WL 34103733, *34103733 (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir.
Apr 27, 1998) Brief of Appellees (NO. 97-56742)
1658 Mae C. WHITE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE,
Washington, Respondent/Appellee., 1998 WL 34086375, *34086375+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir.
1998) Opening Brief of Appellant (NO. 98-35266)
1659 R. Charles BRYFOGLE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Robert D. LITTLE, Attorney at Law; City of Tucson;
Martin A Garcia, Employee of Tucson Police Department; Thomas Berning, City Prosecutor; Doug
Smith, Chief, Tucson Police Department; D. Deibel, Assistant City Prosecutor; M. Bernal, City
Court Magistrate, 1998 WL 34110049, *34110049+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. 1998) Opening Brief
(NO. 98-17438)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1660 CHILDREN OF THE ROSARY, Katherine A. Sabelko, and Arizona Civil Liberties Union,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, Richard C. Thomas, in his official capacity as Public
Transit Director for the City of Phoenix, Neal Manske, in his official capacity as Deputy Director,
Phoenix Transit Department, City of Phoenix, Atc/Vancom Management Services, Inc., and
Transportation Displays, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees., 1997 WL 33547034, *33547034+
(Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Nov 26, 1997) Brief of Defendants-Appellees (NO. 97-16821)
HN:
11 (S.Ct.)
1661 Donna Leone HAMM, in her capacity as a private citizen and in her caapacity,
Defendants/Appellees., 1997 WL 33633814, *33633814+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 13, 1997)
Appellees Pima County's Answering Brief (NO. 96-17229)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1662 Donna Leone HAMM, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA, a sovereign entity; the Arizona
Department of Corrections (ADOC), an entity of the State of Arizona; Pima County, Arizona, a
political subdivision of the State of Arizona; Pima County Sheriff's Office, an administrative agency
of Pima County; Deputy J. Decormis, Deputy Sheriff; Deputy Knight, Deputy Sheriff; Deputy Belin,
Deputy Sheriff, and the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADOC), an entity of the, 1997 WL
33633725, *33633725+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 05, 1997) Appellee's Answering Brief (NO.
96-17093)
1663 Vickie L. EDWARDS and Kathleen Rose McCaulley, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF SANTA
BARBARA, Defendant-Appellant., 1997 WL 33634889, *33634889 (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb
14, 1997) Appellant City's Reply Brief (NO. 95-56790)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1664 Donna Leon HAMM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PIMA COUNTY, Arizona, a Political subdivision of the
State of Arizona; Pima County Sheriff's DEPARTMENT,an administrative agency of Pima County;
J. Decormis, Deputy; Knight, Deputy, sued in both his individual and official capacity;BERLIN,
Deputy, sued in both his individual and official capacity; Sam Lewis Defendants-Appellees., 1997
WL 33633581, *33633581+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 06, 1997) Appellant's Opening Brief
(NO. 96-17229)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1665 John la VOIE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. James HEDRICK, Roger Carrillo, City of Tucson, Steve
Montano, Major Bosner, Prozek, Clarence Dupnik, Pima County, Pima County Sheriffs Department,
Pima County Adult Detention Center Defendant/Appellees., 1996 WL 33649934, *33649934
(Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 06, 1996) Opening Brief (NO. 96-16251)
1666 Harlan L. JACOBSEN, Publisher of Single Scene, Personally Speaking and Solo RFD, PlaintiffAppellant, v. Larry BONINE, Director of the Arizona Highway Department, as an individual,
Defendant-Appellee., 1996 WL 33414288, *33414288+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 09, 1996)
Defendant-Appellee's Answering Brief (NO. 95-17235) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1667 ONE WORLD ONE FAMILY NOW, a Hawaii nonprofit corporation; James McDonough, an
individual; Bhaktivedanta Mission, Ltd., a Hawaii nonprofit corporation; and Anton Voight, an
individual, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; et al., DefendantsAppellees, and Cross-Appellants., 1995 WL 17144559, *17144559+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jan
05, 1995) Opening Brief of Defendant-Appellees and Cross-Appellants (NO. 94-16373, 9416511)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1668 Phyllis Wright HARRIS, Beverly Harris Butler, and Samuel Harris, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. JOINT
SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 241, et al., Defendants/Appellees, Citizens Preserving America's
Heritage, Inc., et al., Intervenor-Defendants/Appellees., 1993 WL 13124873, *13124873+ (Appellate
Brief) (9th Cir. Dec 27, 1993) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Student Coalition for Free Speech in
Support of the Appellees (NO. 93-35839)
HN: 7 (S.Ct.)
1669 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony RAMOS, Defendant-Appellee.,
1993 WL 13097464, *13097464+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 04, 1993) Brief of Appellant (NO.
93-10248)
HN: 8 (S.Ct.)
1670 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ABELES, et al; Silver, Kline, &e Lange,
and John Thorne, re Appointment of Counsel, Defendants-Appellants., 1991 WL 11673289,
*11673289+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 11, 1991) Opening Brief for Appellants Joshua Silver,
Lisa Kline, Virginia Lange, appellants, and John Thorne regarding Appointment of Counsel at
Trial Level (NO. 90-30359, 90-30360, 90-30389)
1671 David Earl SHERO, Appellant, v. CITY OF GROVE/GROVE CITY COUNCIL, William Galletly,
Dorothy Parker, Ivonne Buzzard, Carolyn Nuckolls, Randy Jobe, David Adzigian, Charles Rowe,
David Helms and Robert Nold, individuals, Appellees., 2007 WL 1189550, *1189550+ (Appellate
Brief) (10th Cir. Mar 07, 2007) Appellees' Answer Brief (NO. 06-5222)
1672 Robert MORAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Bill CAMERON and John Davenport,
Defendants/Appellees., 2009 WL 5862583, *5862583+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. May 28, 2009)
Answer Brief of Appellees Bill Cameron and John Davenport (NO. 09-11074-GG)
HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
1673 Robert MORAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bill CAMERON, and John Davenport, DefendantsAppellees., 2009 WL 5862582, *5862582+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Apr 11, 2009) Appellant's
Initial Brief (NO. 09-11074-G)

HN: 7 (S.Ct.)
1674 Thomas McGLADE, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. CITY OF BRADENTON, Florida, et al.,
Defendants, Appellees., 2004 WL 1299969, *1299969+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Feb 09, 2004)
Brief of Appellees (NO. 03-16181-AA)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1675 Marvin v. FRANDSEN, Jan L. Frandsen, Bryan Morris, Frank J. Cervasio, Marianne Cervasio, Dian
Hardison, and Tonianne Wyner, Plaintiffs/Appellants, vs. BREVARD COUNTY, Florida and Brevard
County Sheriff, Phil Williams, Defendants/Appellees., 2002 WL 32355644, *32355644+ (Appellate
Brief) (11th Cir. Nov 15, 2002) Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. 02-13293H)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1676 UPTOWN PAWN & JEWELRY, INC., A Florida Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF
HOLLYWOOD, Defendant-Appellee., 2002 WL 32170082, *32170082 (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir.
Nov 12, 2002) Brief of Appellant (NO. 02-15350-F02-15330-F)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1677 Marvin v. FRANDSEN, Jan L. Frandsen, Bryan Morris, Frank J. Cervasio, Marianne Cervasio, Dian
Hardison, and Tonianne Wyner, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. BREVARD COUNTY, Florida and Brevard
County Sheriff Phil Williams, Defendants/Appellees., 2002 WL 32355641, *32355641+ (Appellate
Brief) (11th Cir. Oct 22, 2002) Answer Brief of Appellee Brevard County, Florida (NO. 0213293-HH)
HN: 9,11 (S.Ct.)
1678 John E. REICHENBACH, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Garrison PARKER, Michael Evans, Andre
Christian, Rudolph Gomez, Shane Burrel, Eric Whitehead, Nathaniel Gray, Thomas Leonard, Clyde
Thrasher, Emmett Stephenson and Fred Banks., Defendants/Appellees., 2000 WL 33982787,
*33982787+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 13, 2000) Brief of Defendants/Appellees (NO. 9915333-JJ)
1679 OCALA WOMEN'S CENTER, et al, Appellants, v. CITY OF OCALA, et al, Ed Martin, et al,
Appellees., 1999 WL 33733434, *33733434 (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Nov 03, 1999)
Consolidated Brief of Appellants Ocala Womens Center et al (NO. 99-13254-HH, 99-12002-H)
1680 Cheryl BISCHOFF and Vicky Stites, Appellants, v. OSCEOLA COUNTY, Florida and Sheriff
Charles Croft, Appellees., 1999 WL 33617182, *33617182+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jun 21,
1999) Answer Brief of Sheriff Charles Croft Appellee (NO. 99-02354)
1681 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marvin FRANDSEN and Bryan Morris,
Defendants-Appellants., 1999 WL 33618030, *33618030 (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Feb 10, 1999)
Brief of Appellee Criminal Case (NO. 98-2174)
1682 Richard KAYFETZ, Appellant, v. Enrique DE MASO, Rene Martinez, and Metropolitan Dade
County, Appellee., 1998 WL 34152260, *34152260+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. May 18, 1998)
Brief of the Appellees (NO. 97-5718)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1683 Richard KAYFETZ, Appellants, v. Enrique DEMASO, et al., Appellees., 1998 WL 34152263,
*34152263+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Apr 14, 1998) Initial Brief of Appellant (NO. 97-5718)
HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1684 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex, rel., Gabe Katmowitz, Esq., Qui Tam (""Qui Tam""),
Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Orlando, FLORIDA; Rick Bernhardt, its Planning and Development Director;
and the Orlando Neighborhood Improvement Corporation (""Onic""), Defendants-Appellees., 1996
WL 33455712, *33455712+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Oct 04, 1996) Answer Brief of Appellees,
Orlando, Florida and Rick Bernhardt (NO. 96-2307)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1685 Robert M. AVERI, Appellant-Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AppelleeRespondent., 1996 WL 33477963, *33477963+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jun 26, 1996) Brief of
Appellant (NO. 94-6844, 95-7008)
HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1686 Robert M. AVERI, Appellant-Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AppelleeRespondent., 1996 WL 33498116, *33498116+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jun 26, 1996) Brief of
Appellant (NO. 94-06844)
HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1687 Robert M. AVERI, Appellant, v. THE UPJOHN COMPANY, INC., et al., Appellees., 1995 WL
17135062, *17135062+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 07, 1995) Brief of Appellant (NO. 946419)
HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1688 Robert M. AVERI, Appellant, v. THE UPJOHN COMPANY, INC., et al., Appellees., 1995 WL
17846948, *17846948 (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 06, 1995) Brief of Appellant (NO. 94-6419)
1689 Anthony Mark DANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF TAMPA, Florida; and Audley Evans,
Executive Director, Tampa Housing Authority, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees., 1994
WL 16139016, *16139016+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jun 24, 1994) Reply Brief of Appellant
(NO. 93-3356, 93-3553)
HN: 4,7,9 (S.Ct.)
Executive Director Tampa Housing Authority, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees., 1994
WL 16139013, *16139013+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 04, 1994) Brief of Appellee Audley
Evans (NO. 93-3356, 93-3553) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
Executive Director, Tampa Housing Authority, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees., 1994
WL 16139015, *16139015+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 03, 1994) Brief of Appellee City of
Tampa (NO. 93-3356, 93-3553) "
HN: 7,9,10 (S.Ct.)
1692 TELESAT CABLEVISION, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. THE CITY OF
RIVIERA BEACH, Florida, a Florida municipal corporation, and Gwc 104, Inc., a Florida
corporation Defendants/Appellees., 1993 WL 13138005, *13138005+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir.
Jan 05, 1993) Appellee City of Riviera Beach's Answer Brief (NO. 91-5908, 91-6055) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1693 COX CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff/Appellee, v. THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, Defendant, CATV & Communications Service Co., Inc., DefendantIntervenor/Appellant., 1992 WL 12131339, *12131339+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jul 02, 1992)
Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 92-8141)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1694 COX CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff/Appellee, v. THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, Defendant, CATV & Communications Service Co., Inc., DefendantIntervenor/Appellant., 1992 WL 12131338, *12131338+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. May 12, 1992)
Brief of Appellant (NO. 92-8141)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1695 THE NATURIST SOCIETY, INC., and T.A. Wyner, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John FILLYAW,
Defendant-Appellee., 1990 WL 10081587, *10081587+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Sep 18, 1990)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1696 THE NATURIST SOCIETY, INC., and T.A. Wyner, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John FILLYAW,
Defendant-Appellee., 1990 WL 10081589, *10081589+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Sep 18, 1990)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1697 Patrick MAHONEY, et al., Appellants, v. John DOE, et al., Appellees., 2010 WL 2552775,
*2552775+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jun 03, 2010) Brief for the Appellees District of Columbia
and Cathy Lanier (In her Official Capacity as Chief of the Metropolitan Police Department)
(NO. 09-7131) "
HN: 9,10 (S.Ct.)
1698 WE THE PEOPLE, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Appellees., 2006 WL 558089,
*558089+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Feb 23, 2006) Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 05-5359)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1699 Danny B. STILLMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al., DefendantsAppellants., 2002 WL 34244429, *34244429+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Sep 27, 2002) Brief of
Plaintiff-Appellee (NO. 02-5234)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1700 Robert LEDERMAN, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States
Capitol Police, Gary Abrecht in his-capacity as Chief of the United States Capitol Police, Lawrence
Loughery, and Charles McQuay, Appellees/Cross-Appellants, District of Columbia and Robert
Rigsby in his official capacity as Corporation Counsel of the District of Columbia, Appellees., 2002
WL 34243769, *34243769+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Feb 07, 2002) Answering and Reply Brief
For Appellant/Cross-Appellee Robert Lederman (Final Version) (NO. 01-5157, 01-5158)
1701 Daniel WEMHOFF, et al, Appellants, v. George W. BUSH, et al., Appellees., 2001 WL 36037863,
*36037863+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Dec 04, 2001) Brief for Appellees (NO. 01-5329)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1702 FRIENDS OF THE VIETNAM VETERANS MEMORIAL, et al., Appellees, v. Roger G.
KENNEDY, et al., Appellants., 1997 WL 34649130, *34649130+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Mar
21, 1997) Reply Brief for Appellants (NO. 95-5393)
HN: 5 (S.Ct.)
1703 FRIENDS OF THE VIETNAM VETERANS MEMORIAL, et al., Appellees, v. Roger G.
KENNEDY, et al., Appellants., 1997 WL 34649128, *34649128+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jan 13,
1997) Brief of Appellants (NO. 95-5393)
1704 NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, et al., Appellee, v. Gwendolyn S. KING, et al.,
Appellants, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, Appellant., 1992 WL
12599765, *12599765+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Sep 08, 1992) Brief for Appellants Gwendolyn
S. King, et al. (NO. 92-5272) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1705 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. FRICKE, Michael W. XXX XX XXXX Lieutenant Commander (04) U. S. Navy, Appellant., 1999 WL 33945006, *33945006+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces
Aug 20, 1999) Appellant's Brief (NO. 98-0783)
1706 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. FRICKE, Michael W. XXX XX XXXX Lieutenant Commander (O4) U. S. Navy, Appellant., 1998 WL 34335104, *34335104+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces
Dec 07, 1998) Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 98-0783)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1707 Carlton Lenard ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, Appellee., 2009 WL 5256944,
*5256944+ (Appellate Brief) (Ala.Crim.App. Mar 17, 2009) Appellant's Argument and
Supporting Brief (NO. CR-08-0629)
1708 State of Alaska, Petitioner, v. Marie ARNARIAK, Respondent; State of Alaska, Petitioner, v. Adam
Arnariak, Respondent., 1995 WL 17814813, *17814813+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska Dec 04, 1995)
Reply Brief of Petitioner (NO. S-07097)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1709 State of Alaska, Petitioner, v. Marie ARNARIAK, Respondent; State of Alaska, Petitioner, v. Adam
Arnariak, Respondent., 1995 WL 17814811, *17814811+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska Aug 25, 1995)
Brief of Appellant (NO. S-07097)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1710 ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Appellant, v. Frank WILLIAMS, Jr., Appellee.,
2008 WL 7827667, *7827667+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark. Sep 02, 2008) Appellant's Brief and
Alternative Petition for Writ of Certiorari Volume I of II Argument (NO. 08-1031) "
1711 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. et al.,
Plaintiff, Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants, Appellees., 2009 WL
2360216, *2360216+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jul 06, 2009) City of Los Angeles' Reply Brief to the
Amicus Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union (NO. S164272)
1712 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., et
al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants-Appellants., 2009 WL
2360217, *2360217+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jul 06, 2009) Answering Brief of International
Society for Krishna Consciousness of California, Inc. to Amicus Curiae Brief of City and
County of San Francisco, et al. (NO. S164272)
Plaintiff, Appellants, and Respondents, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants, Appellees,
and Petitioners., 2009 WL 2821361, *2821361+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jul 06, 2009) City of Los
Angeles' Reply Brief to the Amicus Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union (NO. S164272)
Plaintiff, Appellants, and Respondents, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants, Appellees,
and Petitioners., 2008 WL 5585514, *5585514+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Nov 12, 2008) Petitioners'
City of Los Angeles Opening Brief On the Merits (NO. S164272)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1715 SAN LEANDRO TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, CTA/NEA, and California Teachers Association,
Petitioners, v. GOVERNING BOARD OF THE SAN LEANDRO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
San Leandro Unified School District, Christine Lim and Mike Martinez, Respondents., 2008 WL
2211907, *2211907+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Apr 17, 2008) Petitioners' Reply Brief On the Merits
(NO. S156961)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1716 KIDS AGAINST POLLUTION, et. al., Petitioners and Respondents, v. CALIFORNIA DENTAL
ASSOCIATION, Defendant and Appellant., 2004 WL 1505442, *1505442+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.
May 12, 2004) Application of the Civil Justice Association of California for Permission to File
an Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Appellant; and Amicus Curiae Brief (NO. S117156)
HN: 1,9 (S.Ct.)
1717 Intel Corp. v. Hamidi, 2002 WL 1926523, *22+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jun 17, 2002)
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF INTEL CORPORATION'S ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS
(NO. S103781) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1718 PLANNED PARENTHOOD SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., a California Not for Profit Corporation,
Respondent, v. Christine WILLIAMS, et al., Appellants and Petitioners., 1993 WL 13021124,
*13021124+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Sep 03, 1993) Amicus Brief of Free Speech Advocates in
Support of Petitioners (NO. S031721)
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1719 CALIFORNIA DENTAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant and Appellant, v. KIDS AGAINST
POLLUTION, et. al., Plaintiffs and Respondents., 2003 WL 22135717, *22135717+ (Appellate
Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Feb 11, 2003) Amicus Curiae Brief of the Civil Justice Association of
California in Support of Appellant (NO. A098396)
HN: 1,9 (S.Ct.)
1720 MARIN SAFE HEALTH CARE COALITION, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MARIN GENERAL
HOSPITAL CORPORATION, and Marin Health Care District, Defendants/Respondents., 1997 WL
33815594, *33815594+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Jun 03, 1997) Brief of Respondent
Marin General Hospital (NO. A076566)
1721 Matthew SNATCHKO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WESTFIELD LLC, et al., Defendants and
Respondents., 2010 WL 686353, *686353+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Jan 15, 2010)
Combined Answer to Amicus Briefs (NO. C059985)
1722 SANCTITY OF HUMAN LIFE NETWORK, Murray Lewis, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v.
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, Defendant and Respondent., 1999 WL 33721311, *33721311+
(Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Dec 21, 1999) Respondent's Brief (NO. C032534) "
HN:
10,11 (S.Ct.)
1723 THE DENVER PUBLISHING COMPANY d/b/a Rocky Mountain News, Plaintiff-Appellees/CrossAppellants, v. THE CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO; Paul E. Tauer, in his official capacity as
Mayor of the City of Aurora, Colorado; and James Everett, in his official capacity as Chief of Police
of the City of Aurora, Colorado, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 1994 WL 16068541,
*16068541 (Appellate Brief) (Colo. Jul 18, 1994) Opening Brief (NO. 94SA36) "
HN: 10
(S.Ct.)
1724 SAINT JOHN'S CHURCH IN THE WILDERNESS, a Colorado nonprofit corporation; Charles I.
Thompson, an individual; Charles W. Berberich, an individual, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ken SCOTT,
an individual; Clifton Powell, an individual, Defendant-Appellants., 2007 WL 3391007, *3391007+
(Appellate Brief) (Colo.App. Oct 15, 2007) Plaintiffs-Appellees' Answer Brief (NO. 2006CA2421)
"
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1725 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF COLORADO, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Richard L.
GONZALES, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel
and Administration, Defendant/Appellee., 2007 WL 1335793, *1335793+ (Appellate Brief)
(Colo.App. Apr 09, 2007) Answer Brief and Opening Brief for Cross-Appeal (NO. 2006CA1610)
"
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1726 Paul E. WEBER, Defendant-Below appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff-Below appellee.,
2008 WL 3498012, *3498012+ (Appellate Brief) (Del.Supr. Jun 11, 2008) Appellant's Opening
Brief (NO. 742008)
HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1727 Penelope LANKHEIM, Appellant, v. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY, Board of Trustees,
Appellee., 2008 WL 1964222, *1964222+ (Appellate Brief) (Fla.App. 4 Dist. Mar 14, 2008)
Appellee, Florida Atlantic University, Board of Trustees, Answer Brief (NO. 4D07-3276) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1728 Ann K. LANGTON, Appellant, v. State of Georgia, Appellee., 1991 WL 11033556, *11033556
(Appellate Brief) (Ga. Aug 02, 1991) Brief of Appellant (NO. S91A1352) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1729 Ann K. LANGTON, Appellant, v. State of Georgia, Appellee., 1991 WL 11033557, *11033557
(Appellate Brief) (Ga. Feb 28, 1991) Brief of Appellee (NO. S91A1352)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1730 Idaho Watersheds PROJECT, an Idaho non-profit organization, Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF
LAND COMMISSIONERS, comprised of Phil Batt, Governor, Pete T. Cenarrusa, Secretary of State,
Alan G. Lance, Attorney General, J.D. Williams, State Controller, and Anne C. Fox, Superintendent
of Public Instruction, all in their official capacities; and Idaho Department of Lands, an agency of the
State of Idaho, Respondents., 1998 WL 34301133, *34301133+ (Appellate Brief) (Idaho Apr 15,
1998) Respondent State of Idaho's Brief (NO. 24367) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1731 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony NANCE, DefendantAppellee., 1999 WL 33658050, *33658050+ (Appellate Brief) (Ill. Mar 02, 1999) Brief and
Argument for Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 86105)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1732 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony NANCE, DefendantAppellee., 1999 WL 33726898, *33726898+ (Appellate Brief) (Ill. Mar 02, 1999) Brief and
Argument for Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 86105)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1733 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shandra NASH, Richard Fuller, and
Michael Johnson, Defendants-Appellees., 1996 WL 33437177, *33437177+ (Appellate Brief) (Ill.
Jan 03, 1996) Brief and Argument for Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 79451)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1734 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shandra NASH, Richard Fuller, and
Michael Johnson, Defendants-Appellees., 1996 WL 33468137, *33468137+ (Appellate Brief) (Ill.
Jan 03, 1996) Brief and Argument for Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 79451)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1735 BOARD OF TRUSTEES of Southern Illinois University David White, Jim Bramlet, Richard Moy,
and Terry Travis, Plaintiffs-Petitioners, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Joyce E.
Tucker, Freddie Gatewood, and Stanley R. Moen, Defendants-Respondents., 1992 WL 12577742,
*12577742+ (Appellate Brief) (Ill. Nov 17, 1992) Brief of Amicus Curiae Illinois Department of
Corrections (NO. 73806)
HN: 4 (S.Ct.)
1736 CITY OF HUTCHINSON, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Ronald GOERING, Defendant/Appellant., 2005
WL 2173600, *2173600+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Jan 13, 2005) Brief of Appellant (NO. 0493423-A)
HN: 4,9 (S.Ct.)
1737 CITY OF HAYSVILLE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David W. MCBETH, Defendant-Appellant., 1999 WL
35014497, *35014497 (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Aug 30, 1999) Brief of Appellee (NO. 9881960-A)
1738 WESTBORO BAPTIST CHURCH, et al, Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. CITY OF TOPEKA,
Kansas, Appellant, Joan Hamilton, in Her Official Capacity as District Attorney, Third Judicial
District, Cross-Appellee/Cross-Appellant., 1997 WL 34637531, *34637531+ (Appellate Brief)
(Kan.App. 1997) Brief of Cross-Appellee/Cross-Appellant (NO. 97-79456-A) "
HN: 11
(S.Ct.)
1739 MASSACHUSETTS PRISONERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE; Michael
Shea; Joseph Labriola; John Currie; Michael Fountain; Sandra Currie and Wiliam Smallwood,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Argeo Paul CELLUCCI; Michael Maloney and The Massachusetts
Department of Correction, Defendants-Appellees., 2001 WL 34920049, *34920049+ (Appellate
Brief) (Mass. Mar 19, 2001) Brief of the Appellees (NO. SJC08602)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1740 William WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GEORGETOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY and Patricia
Fyfe, Executive Director, Defendants-Appellants., 1996 WL 33684579, *33684579+ (Appellate
Brief) (Mass. Feb 09, 1996) Brief of The Plaintiff-Appellee William Walker (NO. SJC-07176)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1741 IRISH-AMERICAN GAY, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, an unincorporated association by
and through Timothy Daley, Barbra Kay, and Cathleen Finn, acting on their own behalf and on
behalf of members of the association, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF BOSTON, DefendantAppellee, v. John J. Hurley, individually and the South Boston Allied War Veterans Council,
Defendants-Appellants., 1994 WL 16196354, *16196354 (Appellate Brief) (Mass. Mar 02, 1994)
Brief of the Defendants-Appellants (NO. SJC-06498) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1742 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHSETTS, Appellee, v. Pedro ANDRADE, Appellant., 2007 WL
6675192, *6675192 (Appellate Brief) (Mass.App.Ct. Jun 26, 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. 2007-P0739)
1743 STATE OF MAINE, v. Neil SALISBURY., 2009 WL 3292249, *3292249+ (Appellate Brief) (Me.
Jan 12, 2009) Brief of Appellant (NO. HAN-08-303)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1744 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. Anthony HEDSTROM, DefendantAppellant., 1999 WL 34593008, *34593008 (Appellate Brief) (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Nov 22, 1999)
Appellant's Brief on Appeal (NO. 1997-11585) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1745 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. Yakov SMOLYANSKY,
Defendant-Appellant., 1999 WL 34687577, *34687577 (Appellate Brief) (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Jan 05,
1999) Pro-Se Supplemental Brief (NO. 1996-03552) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1746 In the Matter of the Application of James L. ROGERS, Petitioner-Respondent. For a Judgment
Pursuant to Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, v. New York Transit Authority,
Respondent-Appellant., 1996 WL 34422132, *34422132+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Jan
19, 1996) Respondent's Brief (NO. 1995-05119)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1747 KINGS MALL, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jay L. WENK, Joan W. Keefe, John Doe and Jane
Roe, the last two names being fictitious and intended to be those persons whose identities are not
known to Plaintiff and who have trespassed upon the Property of the Plaintiff and who have
trespassed upon the property of the Plaintiff or engaged in the disorderly activity as described in the
Complaint, Defendants-Appellants., 2006 WL 5529482, *5529482+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y.A.D. 3
Dept. Dec 13, 2006) Brief On Appeal Submitted On Behalf of John and Jane Doe Defendants
Robert Lusk, Jane Vandebogart, David Bruner and Ann Katz (NO. 501776)
HN: 7 (S.Ct.)
1748 OHIOANS FOR CONCEALED CARRY, INC., et al., Appellees, v. CITY OF CLYDE, et al.,
Appellants., 2008 WL 974930, *974930+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio Feb 28, 2008) Reply Brief of
Appellant City of Clyde (NO. 07-0960)
1749 OHIOANS FOR CONCEALED CARRY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs - appellees, v. CITY OF CLYDE,
OHIO, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2007 WL 4620238, *4620238 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio Dec 07,
2007) Brief of Amici Curiae the Ohio Municipal League and Numerous Ohio Municipalities
Urging Reversal On Behalf of Appellant the City of Clyde, Ohio (NO. 07-0960)
HN: 4
(S.Ct.)
1750 Vernon BELLECOURT, et al., Appellees, v. CITY OF CLEVELAND, Appellant., 2004 WL
5284041, *5284041+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio Jan 12, 2004) Merit Brief of Appellant City of
Cleveland (NO. 2003-1202)
1751 Vernon BELLECOURT, et al., Appellees, v. CITY OF CLEVELAND, Appellant., 2003 WL
23644250, *23644250 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio Jul 10, 2003) Memorandum in Support of
Jurisdiction of Appellant City of Cleveland (NO. 2003-1202)
1752 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Vicki Lou WOODS, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL
7008257, *7008257+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Nov 27, 2007) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO.
A132310)
1753 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee, v. Frank CHESTER, Appellant., 1998 WL
34113019, *34113019+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa. Mar 29, 1998) Initial Brief of Appellant (NO.
201CAP)
1754 Katherine E. STINE, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Department of
Public Welfare, Respondent., 2001 WL 34754430, *34754430+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Cmwlth. Aug
10, 2001) Brief for Respondent (NO. 786CD2001) "
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1755 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee, v. Hozay ROYAL aka Carlos Johnson., 2009
WL 3612341, *3612341+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. Mar 12, 2009) Brief in Support of Appeal
(NO. 1999EDA2008)
1756 Michael PIERGALLINE and Mary Kay Piergalline, v. Melissa PIERGALLINE and Kurt Lundquist,
Appeal of Kurt Lundquist., 2005 WL 3986605, *3986605+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. Sep 06,
2005) Appellant's Brief (NO. 01702EDA05)
HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1757 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondant, v. John COLBERT, Pro Se, Petitioner.,
2002 WL 32352019, *32352019+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. Jun 07, 2002) Brief for Appellant
(NO. 01458EDA02)
HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1758 Pastor Rick BARR and Philemon Homes, Inc., Appellants, v. THE CITY OF SINTON, Appellees.,
2004 WL 2145898, *2145898+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi Aug 31, 2004) The City
of Sinton's Appellee's Brief (NO. 13-03-00727-CV)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1759 Conrad LILLY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee., 2009 WL 3847961, *3847961+
(Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Eastland Oct 26, 2009) Brief for the State (NO. 11-09-00140-)
1760 Narciso PEDRO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee., 2009 WL 3847963, *3847963+
(Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Eastland Oct 26, 2009) Brief for the State (NO. 11-09-00141-)
1761 Conrad LILLY, Appellant, v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee., 2009 WL 3145682, *3145682+
(Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Eastland Aug 27, 2009) Appellant's Brief (NO. 11-09-00140-)
1762 Narciso PEDRO, Appellant, v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee., 2009 WL 3145683, *3145683+
1763 Conrad LILLY, Appellant, v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee., 2009 WL 3443106, *3443106+
1764 Narciso PEDRO, Appellant, v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee., 2009 WL 3443107, *3443107+
1765 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Appellant, v. Kevin Lamont HICKS, Appellee., 2001 WL
34831898, *34831898 (Appellate Brief) (Va. Dec 05, 2001) Brief of Amici City of Richmond and
Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority in Support of the Commonwealth's Petition
for Appeal (NO. 011728)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1766 RESIDENT ACTION COUNCIL, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. SEATTLE HOUSING AUTHORITY and
Tom Tierney, Executive Director of the Seattle Housing Authority, in his Official Capacity,
Defendant/Appellant., 2006 WL 4572760, *4572760+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Aug 16, 2006) Brief
of Defendant-Appellant, Seattle Housing Authority (NO. 80006-5, 58260-7)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1767 WASHINGTON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, on behalf of itself and its members, Respondents,
v. WASHINGTON STATE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COMMISSION, Christine Yorozu, Chair, Gerry
Marsh, Lois Clement, Susan Brady, and Ronda Cahill, Commissioners of the Public Disclosure
Commission, in their individual capacities, Appellants., 2003 WL 24118146, *24118146+ (Appellate
Brief) (Wash. Jan 27, 2003) Brief of Respondents (NO. 72877-1) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1768 CITY OF BREMERTON, Respondent, v. Karl WIDELL and Larry Blunt, Petitioners., 1999 WL
33958395, *33958395+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Sep 16, 1999) Amicus Curiae Brief of Bremerton
Housing Authority (NO. 67451-5)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1769 CITY OF BREMERTON, Respondent, v. Larry BLUNT, and Karl Widell, Petitioners., 1999 WL
33958398, *33958398+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Jul 22, 1999) Brief of Respondent (NO. 67451-5)
HN: 10,12 (S.Ct.)
1770 RESIDENT ACTION COUNCIL, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. SEATTLE HOUSING AUTHORITY and
Tom Tierney, Executive Director of the Seattle Housing Authority, in his Official Capacity,
Defendant/Appellant., 2006 WL 5504175, *5504175+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash.App. Aug 16, 2006)
Brief of Defendant-Appellant, Seattle Housing Authority (NO. 58260-7-I)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1771 State of WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Scott R. JENSEN, Steven M. Foti and Sherry L.
Schultz, Defendants-Appellants-Petitioners., 2004 WL 3248533, *3248533+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.
Sep 16, 2004) Brief and Appendix of Plaintiff-Respondent (NO. 03-0106-CR)
HN: 10
(S.Ct.)
1772 State of WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Scott R. JENSEN, Steven M. Foti and Sherry L.
Schultz, Defendants-Appellants., 2003 WL 24029060, *24029060+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. IV
Dist. Sep 18, 2003) Reply Brief of Defendants-Appellants Scott R. Jensen, Steven M. Foti and
Sherry L. Schultz (NO. 03-0106-)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1773 State of WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Charles CHVALA, Defendant-Appellant., 2003 WL
24028971, *24028971+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. IV Dist. Sep 04, 2003) Brief of PlaintiffRespondent (NO. 03-0442-)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1774 State of WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Scott R. JENSEN, Steven M. Foti, and Sherry L.
Schultz, Defendants-Appellants., 2003 WL 24029059, *24029059+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. IV
Dist. Jul 24, 2003) Brief of Plaintiff-Respondent (NO. 03-0106-)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1775 Deborah MCGARVEY, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. KEY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC, and
Bicentiennial Village Associates LLC, Appellees (Defendants)., 2008 WL 6983688, *6983688+
(Appellate Brief) (Wyo. Nov 26, 2008) Brief of Appellees (NO. S-08-0194)
HN: 1,7 (S.Ct.)
1776 Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc., 2002 WL 1593747, *1593747 (Appellate Brief)
(U.S. Jul 12, 2002) BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE, PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL
TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC. (PETA) IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS (NO. 01-1118)
HN: 7 (S.Ct.)
1777 Thomas v. Chicago Park Dist., 2001 WL 799231, *799231+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 13, 2001)
BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC. IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS
(NO. 00-1249)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
Trial Court Documents (U.S.A.)
Trial Pleadings
1778 WE THE PEOPLE FOUNDATION INC., 2458 Ridge Road, Queesnsbury, NY 12804; We the
People Congress, Inc., 2458 Ridge Road, Queesnsbury, NY 12804; Robert L. Schulz, 2458 Ridge
Road, Queesnsbury, NY 12804; Joseph Banister, 2282 Sunny Vista Dr., San Jose, CA 95128; John
Turner, Po Box 612, Paradise, CA 95967 and other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED
STATES; U.S. Treasury Department, Main Treasury Building, 1500 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, D.C., 2004 WL 2057130, *2057130 (Trial Pleading) (D.D.C. Jul 19, 2004) Class
Action Complaint for Declaratory Relief, Equitable Relief, and Injunctive Relief (NO.
104CV01211)
1779 Elorde METEZIER, individually and as class representatives on behalf of all drivers operating motor
vehicles within Broward County, Florida Plaintiff, v. Dale ROSS, as Chief Judge of the 17th Judicial
Circuit Court in and for Broward County and as Administrator of the Civil Traffic Hearing Officers
Program of Broward County, and Howard C. Forman, as Broward County Clerk of courts,
Defendants., 2004 WL 2890572, *2890572 (Trial Pleading) (S.D.Fla. Nov 15, 2004) Verified
Complaint for Injunctive Relief and Damages for Violation of Civil Rights (NO. 04-CV-61522)
1780 Patrick W. BARRON III, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF FLORIDA Judge R. Eade, Judge R. Ead, Broward
County, Florida 17th Judicial Circuit Court 15th Judicial Circuit Court 4th District Court of Appeals
Clerks of the Court-17th JCC; H. Foreman, Ed. Kennedy, D.J. Harrington, et al., H. Poznanski, Esq.
R. Argov, Y. Argov, Governor, State of Florida, Attorney General, State of Florida Secretary of State,
State of Florida & unnamed judges, notaries public, Et Alia.,, 2004 WL 2875216, *2875216 (Trial
Pleading) (S.D.Fla. Jun 07, 2004) Amendment of Initial Complaint (NO. 04-60407BANDSTRA/DI)
1781 Joseph KAUFMAN, individually and as class representative on behalf of all residents of the City of
Tamarac Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TAMARAC, Defendants,, 2000 WL 34460649, *34460649 (Trial
Pleading) (S.D.Fla. Oct 24, 2000) Verified Complaint for Emergency Temporary Restraining
Order and Permanent Injunctive Relief and Damages for Violation of Civil Rights (NO. 007580)
1782 Sal CELAURO Jr; Paul S. Astrup; and Rosanne B. Astrup, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES; Internal
Reven Service; Lawrence Engle, individually and in his official capacity; Smith's Aerospace, Inc.;
Teacher's Federal Credit Union; and DCS Transport & Logistics Solutions, Defendants., 2005 WL
1477089, *1477089 (Trial Pleading) (E.D.N.Y. May 09, 2005) Verified Complaint (NO. CV052245)
1783 Robert L. SCHULZ; Diane Lukaris; Raymond Bassette, Sr.; Keith Gilligan; Bruce Turnbull; Louis
Navarro; and Judith Porcaro, Plaintiffs, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS;
Andrew J. Williamson, individually and in his official capacity as Chairman of the Washington
County Board of Supervisors; Washington County Treasurer's Office; Phyllis Cooper, individually
and in her official capacity as Washington county Treasurer; Washington County Clerk's, 2004 WL
3513175, *3513175 (Trial Pleading) (N.D.N.Y. Nov 29, 2004) Verified Complaint (NO. INDEX04CV-1375LEX/R)
Expert Testimony
1784 David W. HASSIG and Donald L. Hassig, Plaintiffs, v. John P. CAHILL, Individually and as
Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Larry Johnson,
Picotte Companies, Thomas P. McCarville, John Doe 1, Defendants., 2003 WL 25547166,
*25547166+ (Expert Deposition) (N.D.N.Y. Mar 07, 2003) Memorandum of Law in Support of
Rule 56(b) Motion for Summary Judgment on Behalf of Defendants Cahill and Johnson (NO.
701-CV-0284, TJM)
Trial Motions, Memoranda and Affidavits

1785 Roy WARDEN, a single man, individually, Plaintiff, v. Chris HOFFMAN, individually and in his
official capacity as employee at Superior Court of Arizona, Pima County; V.P. Goldsworthy,
individually and in her official capacity as Deputy of Pima County Sheriff's Department; the
Honorable Howard Fell, individually and in his official capacity as Judge of the Pima County
Superior Court; the Honorable John Leonardo, individually and in his official capacity as Chief,
2007 WL 4435801, *4435801+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. Nov 16, 2007)
Arizona's Reply to Response to Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CIV05-20-TUC-JCG)
1786 Roy WARDEN, a single man, individually, Plaintiff, v. Chris HOFFMAN, individually and in his
official capacity as employee at Superior Court of Arizona, Pima County; V.P. Goldsworthy,
individually and in her official capacity as Deputy of Pima County Sheriff's Department; the
Honorable Howard Fell, individually and in his official capacity as Judge of the Pima County
Superior Court; the Honorable John Leonardo, individually and in his official capacity as Chief,
2006 WL 1387029, *1387029+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. Apr 04, 2006)
Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Hoffman, Fell, and Leonardo (NO. CIV05020TUCFRZ)
1787 THE ARKANSAS TIMES, INC.; Northwest Arkansas Chapter of the Society of Professional
Journalists; and Max Brantley, Plaintiffs, v. Larry B. NORRIS, Director, Arkansas Department of
Correction, Defendant., 2007 WL 6969951, *6969951 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit)
(E.D.Ark. Aug 17, 2007) Brief in Support of the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 507-CV195SWW) "
1788 Wilma Nell ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF LAKE CITY, Arkansas, and Mayor Jerry
Bowman, alderman Billy Mann, Alderman Doug Stone, Alderman Larry Ladd, Alderman Dereck
Mccormick, Alderman Mike Brown, Alderman Rob Love, Patrolman Frank Lyle, and Police Chief
Terry Wicker, individually acting under color of State law, Defendants., 2000 WL 34544443,
*34544443 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. May 23, 2000) Defendants'
Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO.
398CV400SMR)
1789 Wilma Nell ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF LAKE CITY, Arkansas, and Mayor Jerry
Bowman, Alderman Billy Mann, Alderman Doug Stone, Alderman Larry Ladd, Alderman Dereck
Mccormick, Alderman Mike Brown, Alderman Rob Love, Patrolman Frank Lyle, and Police Chief
Terry Wicker, individually acting under color of State law, Defendants., 2000 WL 34544428,
*34544428 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. May 01, 2000) Brief in Support
of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 398CV400SMR) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1790 Alicia UNGER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Chief Ronald J. Boyd; Sgt. Kevin
McCloskey, and Does 1 thru 10, Inclusive, Defendants., 2008 WL 7181441, *7181441+ (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Dec 08, 2008) Memorandum of Points and
Authorities in Support of Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Re First
Amendment Claim [F.R.C.P. 56(b)] (NO. CV08-02139SVW, CTX)
HN: 2,10 (S.Ct.)
1791 Orrin WOODWARD, Billy Florence, Don Wilson, Tim Marks, Chuck Cullen, Kirk, Birtles, Randy
Haugen, Chris Brady, Jim Martin, Aron Radosa, Chuck Goetschel, David Brandy, Benjamin L.
Dickie, Bruce Gilbank, and Mike Martensen, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated,
Plaintiffs, v. QUIXTAR INC., Defendant., 2007 WL 2736011, *2736011+ (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Sep 04, 2007) Defendant Quixtar Inc.'s Reply
Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss or Stay and Compel Compliance with Dispute
Resolution Agreement (NO. CV07-05194GAF)
HN: 8 (S.Ct.)
1792 Kevin BORDEN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of California; Susana Alcala Wood, City Attorney of the City of Modesto,
in her individual capacity; and Vicki Rice, Events Supervisor II, Department of Parks, Recreation
and Neighborhoods of the City of Modesto, in her individual capacity, Defendants., 2008 WL
7242222, *7242222 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Cal. Oct 02, 2008)
Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 08-CV-01061AWI-SMS) "
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1793 Kevin BORDEN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of California; Susana Alcala Wood, City Attorney of the City of Modesto,
in her individual capacity; and Vicki Rice, Events Supervisor II, Department of Parks, Recreation
and Neighborhoods of the City of Modesto, in her individual capacity, Defendants., 2008 WL
7242221, *7242221+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Cal. Sep 02, 2008)
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint, or in the
Alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement [Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), 12(e)] (NO. 108CV-01061-AWI-SMS) "
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1794 David D. WESNER, Janice L. Wesner and Don Wesner, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF NAPA and
Napa County Board of Supervisors, Defendants., 2008 WL 7321855, *7321855 (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Oct 22, 2008) Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion
to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon Which Relief Can Be Granted or, Alternatively,
for a More Definite Statement; (FRCP 12(b)(6) and FRCP 12(e)) (NO. CV083377JSW)
1795 David D. WESNER, Janice L. Wesner and Don Wesner, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF NAPA and
Napa County Board of Supervisors, Defendants., 2008 WL 7321856, *7321856 (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Sep 30, 2008) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in
Support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon Which Relief Can Be Granted
or, Alternatively, for a More Definite Statement; (FRCP 12(b)(6) and ... (NO. CV083377JSW)
1796 Charles O. Bradley TRUST, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ZENITH CAPITAL LLC, et al., Defendants., 2008
WL 5204895, *5204895 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Sep 22, 2008)
Defendants' Motion in Limine Number 1 for Bifurcation of the Trial on Liability and Punitive
Damages (NO. C042239JSW)
HN: 8 (S.Ct.)
1797 Regina MONACO, an individual, Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF
BOSTON, Liberty Life Mutual Insurance Company and Does 1 through 50 inclusive, Defendants.,
2008 WL 1840466, *1840466+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jan 22, 2008)
Notice of Motion and Motion By Defendants for Partial Summary Judgment, and
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendants' Motion (FRCP 56) (NO.
306CV07021)
1798 Kortney BLYTHE, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF BERKELEY, Defendants., 2007 WL 2890727, *2890727+
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Aug 31, 2007) Reply in Support of
Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. C07-03173MMC)
1799 Kortney BLYTHE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BERKELEY, Defendant., 2007 WL 2890726, *2890726+
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Aug 24, 2007) Defendant City of Berkeley's
Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. C07-03173MMC)
1800 Deniz BOLBOL, an individual; Joseph Cuviello, an individual; Tracey Demartini, an individual; and
Alfredo Kuba, individual; Plaintiffs, v. RINGLING BROTHERS and Barnum and Bailey Circus; the
City of San Jose; and Hp Pavilion Management, Defendants., 2006 WL 434941, *434941 (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jan 09, 2006) Defendant City of San Jose's Trial
Brief (NO. C04-00082JW)
1801 Sri Louise COLES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal entity, et al., Defendants.,
2005 WL 3606650, *3606650+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Nov 03, 2005)
Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication
against Individual Plaintiffs (NO. C-03-2961TEH, JL)
1802 Deniz BOLBOL, an individual; Joseph Cuviello, an individual; Aaron Lodge, an individual; Tracey
Demartini, an individual; and Alfredo Kuba, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. Ringling BROTHERS and
Barnum and Bailey Circus; the City of San Jose; and HP Pavilion Management, Defendants., 2005
WL 3979685, *3979685 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jan 10, 2005)
Defendant City of San Jose's Trial Brief (NO. C04-00082JW)
1803 THG ENTERPRISES, INC., dba The Tax and Law Center, and Jim Harnsberger, Plaintiffs, v. CITY
OF EL CAJON, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants., 2000 WL 34445042, *34445042+
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Cal. Sep 25, 2000) Memorandum of Points and
Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (FRCP 65(b)) (NO.
00-1781-IEG, AJB)
1804 Keith LANCE, Carl Miller, Renee Nelson, Nancy O'Connor, Plaintiffs, v. Donetta DAVIDSON,
Secretary of State for the State of Colorado, in her Official Capacity, Defendant., 2005 WL 5468462,
*5468462+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Colo. Feb 14, 2005) Plaintiffs' Response
to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 03-Z-2453, CBS)
1805 THE BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Thoimas K.
JONES, in his official capacity as Ethics Enforcement Officer for the State of Connecticut Office of
State Ethics, and Carol Carson, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the State of
Connecticut Office of State Ethics, Defendants., 2009 WL 4313330, *4313330 (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. May 29, 2009) Memorandum of Law in Support of
Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 309CV00851) "
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1806 Michael BOARDLEY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al.,
Defendants., 2008 WL 4385997, *4385997 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Jun
11, 2008) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendants' Alternative
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment (NO. 07-01986, JR)
1807 Reverend Patrick J. MAHONEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, et
al., Defendants., 2006 WL 1780394, *1780394 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C.
May 31, 2006) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment
(NO. 05-1786RCL)
1808 Vaughn BENNETT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES CHESS FEDERATION, et. al., Defendant., 2006
WL 1327134, *1327134 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Apr 12, 2006)
Defendant David Mehler's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
(NO. 105CV02225)
1809 COMMUNITY FOR CREATIVE NON-VIOLENCE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Carmen E. TURNER,
General Manager, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Defendant., 1989 WL 1634856,
*1634856 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Mar 15, 1989) Defendant's
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment (NO. 88-1048-SS)
1810 Anthony CATRON, Charles R. Hargis, Michael Lile, Ferdinand Lupperger, JO Anne Reynolds,
William Shumate, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF
ST. Petersburg, Defendant., 2009 WL 4380372, *4380372 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and
Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Jun 15, 2009) Defendant, City of St. Petersburg's Dispositive Motion to
Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 809-CV-00923-EAK-EAJ)
1811 David BOOHER, Plaintiff, v. MARION COUNTY and Sheriff Ed Dean, in his official Capacity as
Sheriff of Marion County, Defendants., 2008 WL 7192172, *7192172 (Trial Motion, Memorandum
and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Mar 11, 2008) Defendant, Sheriff ED Dean's Response in Opposition to
Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Permanent Injunction with
Supporting Memorandum of Law (NO. 507-CV-00282-OC-WTH-)
1812 KEVIN EDWARD LINDQUIST, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and UNITED
STATES MARSHALLS' SERVICE, Defendants., 2007 WL 1495755, *1495755 (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Apr 24, 2007) Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or,
Alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 06CV01810)
1813 Jan P. HALL, Plaintiff, v. ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and Ronald Blocker in his
individual and official capacities, Defendants., 2007 WL 1495749, *1495749+ (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Apr 19, 2007) Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant
Ronald Blocker's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (NO. 606-CV-1737-ORL-31KR)
1814 Kevin Edward LINDQUIST, Plaintiff, v. Officer MUNRO, individually Alberto Gonzales, as his
official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States of America, Defendants.,
2007 WL 857012, *857012 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Feb 12, 2007)
Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment (NO.
606-CV-1810-ORL-31DA)
1815 Nadia K. NAFFE, Plaintiff, v. REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA, Republican National
Committee and Bush-Cheney 04, Inc., Defendants., 2005 WL 3122290, *3122290 (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Oct 04, 2005) Plaintiff's Response to Defendant
Republican Party of Florida's Motion for Partial Judgment (NO. 804-CV-1916-T-27TGW)
1816 INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION AFL-CIO LOCAL 1359 AND LOCAL
1922 on Their Behalf and on Behalf of Their Members, Plaintiffs, v. DCL PORT FACILITIES
CORPORATION Canaveral Port Authority, Defendants., 2004 WL 2739396, *2739396 (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Apr 28, 2004) Reply to Defendant, Dcl's,
Memorandum in Opposition to the Plaintiff, Ila's, Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO.
604-CV-387-ORL-28KRS)
1817 Gary MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, a Political subdivision of the State of
Florida, Defendant., 2004 WL 1887136, *1887136+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit)
(M.D.Fla. Feb 12, 2004) Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary
Judgment with Memorandum of Law (NO. 803-CV-822-T-TGW)
1818 Larry CARPENTER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TAMPA, Defendant., 2004 WL 1887854, *1887854+
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Jan 21, 2004) Plaintiff's Response in
Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment with Memorandum of Law (NO.
803CV451-T-17EAJ)
1819 Thomas MCGLADE, individually, Linda McGlade, individually, Christopher Case, individually, and
Howard Heldreth, individually, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF BRADENTON, FLORIDA, A political
subdivision of the state of Florida, Russell Tibbitts, as an Individual and/or as an agent/employee of
City of Bradenton, Florida, a Political subdivision of the state of Florida; Carlos Craddock, as an
individual and/or as an agent/employee of City of Bradenton, Florida, a, 2003 WL 23804634,
*23804634 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Jul 25, 2003) Memorandum of
Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Tibbitts and Craddock (NO.
802-CV-232-T-23MAP)
1820 Albert CLEVELAND, Plaintiff, v. COCOA BEACH, Janice Scott and Gary E. Eckstine,
Defendants., 2003 WL 23806548, *23806548 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla.
Jun 23, 2003) Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant Janice Scott's Motion for
Summary Judgment (NO. 602-CV-1294-ORL-22KR)
1821 Marvin V. FRANDSEN, Jan L. Frandsen, Bryan Morris, Frank J. Cervasio, Marianne Cervasio, Dian
Hardison and Tonianne Wyner, Plaintiffs, v. BREVARD COUNTY, Florida and Brevard County
Sheriff Phil Williams, Defendants., 2002 WL 32654686, *32654686+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum
and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Feb 05, 2002) Plaintiffs' Response to Brevard County's Motion for
Summary Judgment (NO. 600-CV-661-ORL-22B)
and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Feb 05, 2002) Defendant, Brevard County, Florida's, Response to
Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against Defendant, Brevard County (NO.
600-CV-661-ORL-22B)
and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Jan 04, 2002) Defendant, Brevard County, Florida's, Motion for
Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support (NO. 600-CV-661-ORL-22B)
1824 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Wilfredo ROBLES, Defendant., 2006 WL 6331027,
*6331027 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. May 05, 2006) Omnibus Motions
for Judgement of Acquittal and New Trial (NO. 05-20915-CR-MIDDLEBR) HN: 6 (S.Ct.)
1825 Adriana NARVAEZ, Plaintiff, v. Eduardo GONZALEZ, individually, and in his capacity as Council
Member for the City of Hialeah; the Canvassing Board of the City of Hialeah; the Hialeah Housing
Authority; and Alex Morales, individually, and in his capacity as Executive Director of the Hialeah
Housing Authority, Defendants., 2004 WL 3671108, *3671108 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and
Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Sep 10, 2004) Plaintiff's Consolidated Response to Defendants' Motions to
Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (NO. 03-23369-CIV-GRAHAM/)
1826 Nanci S. ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. Jose QUINTERO, in his individual capacity, and City of
Miami, Defendants., 2003 WL 23815539, *23815539 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit)
(S.D.Fla. Jul 21, 2003) Plaintiff Nanci Alexander's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion
for Reconsideration of Order Granting Final Summary Judgment (NO. 02-21054-CIVMARTINE)
Miami, Defendants., 2003 WL 23814759, *23814759+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit)
(S.D.Fla. Jul 16, 2003) Plaintiff Nanci Alexander's Motion for Reconsideration of Order
Granting Final Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion (NO.
02-21054-CIV-MARTINE) "
HN: 4,7,9 (S.Ct.)
Miami, Defendants., 2003 WL 23814755, *23814755 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit)
(S.D.Fla. Feb 23, 2003) Defendants, City of Miami and Officer Jose Quinteros' Reply to
Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Final Summary
Judgment (NO. 02-21054-CIV-MARTINE)
(S.D.Fla. Feb 20, 2003) Plaintiff Nanci Alexander's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to
Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (NO. 02-21054-CIV-MARTINE) "
HN: 7
(S.Ct.)
(S.D.Fla. Dec 26, 2002) Defendant Officer Jose Quintero's Motion for Final Summary
Judgment; Memorandum of Law; Statement of Material Facts (NO. 02-21054-CIV-MALIWEZ)
1831 Penelope LANKHEIM, Plaintiff, v. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY, Defendant., 2001 WL
34714897, *34714897 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Nov 13, 2001)
Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants Motion to Compel (NO. 01-CIV6442-ZLOCH)

1832 UPTOWN PAWN & JEWELRY, INC., A Florida Corporation, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF
HOLLYWOOD, A Florida Municipal Corporation, Defendant., 2001 WL 34700683, *34700683
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Oct 23, 2001) Plaintiff's Reply to
Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Support of
Preliminary Injunction, Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and Reply
to ... (NO. 00-7195CIVLENARD)
1833 Vincent MANCINI 5048 Lantana Road-Apt. 5211 Lake Worth, Florida 33463, Plaintiff, v. Judi
MILLER, Karen Knapp, John Carvelli, Kathryn Hensley, Sam Gaines, William Vogel, Russell
Anderson, Susan Ranew, Jacob Gallmon, Mazie Epps, John Townsend, David Washington, the St.
Lucie County Board of Education, Defendants., 2001 WL 34718034, *34718034+ (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Aug 24, 2001) Emergency Motion for Injunctive Rrelief
and Supporting Memorandum of Law (NO. 01-14256CIV-MOORE)
1834 Joseph KAUFMAN, individually and as class representative on behalf of all residents of the City of
Tamarac Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TAMARAC, Defendants., 2000 WL 34460660, *34460660 (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Oct 24, 2000) Emergency Motion &
Memorandum of Law for Ex-Parte Temporary Restraining Order (NO. 00-7580CIV-SEITZ)
1835 Fredric W. BAUMANN, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF CUMMING, Georgia, and Mike Eason, in his
official capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Cumming, Defendants., 2007 WL 4703938,
*4703938+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ga. Sep 05, 2007) Memorandum in
Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 207-CV-0095-WCO)
1836 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Justin GRIGG, Defendant(s)., 2005 WL 5860080,
*5860080 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Idaho Sep 12, 2005) Government's
Response to Motion to Suppress (NO. 05-74-S-BLW)
1837 Kevin D. CANTRELL, Plaintiff, v. Rod R. BLAGOJEVICH, Governor, State of Illinois; Michael M.
Rumman, Director, Department of Central Management Services; Jerry Adams, Building Manager,
James R. Thompson Center; Jennifer Haley, Special Events Director, James R. Thompson Center;
and John Does I through V, as members of the Department of Central Management Services Police;
in their official and individual capacities, Defendants., 2004 WL 2816937, *2816937+ (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ill. Jun 10, 2004) Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction
and Memorandum of Law in Support (NO. 104-CV-03041)
1838 FIRST DEFENSE LEGAL AID, Sladjana Vuckovic, and Dawn Sheikh, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF
CHICAGO, Chicago Police Supt. Terry Hillard, Area One Commander Frank Trigg, Area Two
Commander Walter Green, Area Four Commander Richard Kobel, Area Five Commander Gerald
Mahnke, John Does 1 to 2, Police Det. Kaiser, Police Sgt. Wilkins, and Cook County State's
Attorney Richard A. Devine, Defendants., 2002 WL 32675541, *32675541+ (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ill. Jun 28, 2002) Supplemental Response of Defendants
Hillard, Trigg, Green, Kobel and Mahnke in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary
Restraining Order and for Emergency Injunctive Relief (NO. 01C9671)
1839 Kevin LOGAN, Plaintiff, v. GARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION, Board of School
Trustees of the Gary Community School Corporation, Mary Steele-Agee, in her official capacity as
Superintendent, and Diana Rouse, in her individual Capacity and official capacity as Principal,
Defendants., 2008 WL 7257482, *7257482 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ind.
Feb 15, 2008) Defendant's Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss
(NO. 207CV00431)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1840 Kevin LOGAN, Plaintiff, v. GARY COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION, Board of School
Trustees of the Gary Community School Corporation, Mary Steele-Agee, in her official capacity as
Superintendent, and Diana Rouse, in her individual Capacity and official capacity as Principal,
Defendants., 2008 WL 7257483, *7257483 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ind.
Feb 15, 2008) Defendant's Memorandum of Law in Support of Defenants' Motion to Dismiss
(NO. 207CV00431)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1841 Thomas Z. LEWIS, et al, Plaintiffs, v. Joel SILVERMAN, et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 781863,
*781863 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ind. Feb 15, 2006) Memorandum in
Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (NO. 205-CV352PPS-PRC)
1842 Thomas Z. LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Joel SILVERMAN, et al., Defendants., 2005 WL 3284464,
*3284464 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ind. Oct 28, 2005) Memorandum in
Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 205-CV-352PPS-PRC)
1843 David P. WALKER and Ronda J. Walker, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Science
Applications International Corporation, EAI Corporation, Terry Griffith, William E. Payne, Jr.,
Gerald W. (Gary) Richardson, James C. Mcnair, Jay Dotson, Russell Cartee, and Robert S. (Steve)
Hiatt, Defendants., 2009 WL 632501, *632501+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit)
(S.D.Ind. Jan 23, 2009) United States' Reply to Plaintiffs' Response Opposing the United States'
Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary
Judgment and Its Renewed and Supplemental ... (NO. 107CV01609)
1844 OLD PATHS BAPTIST CHURCH et al, v. MERRY et al., 2007 WL 4568460, *4568460+ (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ind. Jun 18, 2007) Defendants' Combined Response in
Opposition to Plaintiffs' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply in Support of
Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 05CV00079)
1845 WORLD WIDE STREET PREACHERS' FELLOWSHIP; et al., Plaintiffs, v. Bart PETERSON, in
his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Indianapolis, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 2881932,
*2881932 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ind. Mar 22, 2004) Response to Motion
for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 103-CV-1516JDT-TAB)
1846 Harlan J. JACOBSEN, Dba Country Singles, Single Scene and Jacobsen Distribution, Plaintiff, v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, State of Iowa, Steven F. McMenamin, Rest Area
Administrator, in that capacity and as an individual; Will Zitterich, Office of Maintenance, DOT, in
that capacity and as an individual; Thomas J. Vilsack, Governor of Iowa, in that capacity and as an
individual; Mark Hunacek, as an individual, Defendants., 2004 WL 3323076, *3323076+ (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Iowa Apr 16, 2004) Brief in Support of Defendants'
Motion for Summary Judgement (NO. C03-4097MWB)
1847 Jacque FARNSWORTH, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MULVANE, Kansas, Defendant., 2009 WL 4663331,
*4663331 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Kan. May 11, 2009) Defendant's
Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 608CV01150)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1848 Eleanor MCCULLEN, Jean Blackburn Zarrella, Gregory A. Smith, Carmel Farrell, and Eric Cadin,
Plaintiffs, v. Martha COAKLEY, in her capacity as Attorney General for the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, Defendant., 2008 WL 7243291, *7243291 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and
Affidavit) (D.Mass. Feb 20, 2008) Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary
Injunction (NO. 108CV10066)
HN: 7,9 (S.Ct.)
1849 ANDREW P. and Glena K. Grosjean, Plaintiffs, v. Sharon BOMMARITO; Maureen Michalksi;
Narvie Twyman, in their official and individual capacities., Defendants., 2006 WL 655391, *655391
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Feb 24, 2006) Defendants' Reponse to
Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injuction (NO. 205-CV-74338)
1850 LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. LONG LAKE TOWNSHIP, John Kelley, Donald
Burchett, Dan Hale, Matt Skeels, Glenn Peroceschi, William Johnson, Harold Kelly and Christine
Allen, Defendants., 2003 WL 23881262, *23881262+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit)
(W.D.Mich. Apr 24, 2003) Brief in Support of Defendant Township, Kelley, Hale, Skeels,
Peroceschi, Johnson, Kelly and Allen's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 102-CV-920)
1851 Dennis Larson LOOP, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Marshal's
Service, United States Marshal Russ Bankey, Defendants., 2005 WL 3621616, *3621616 (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Minn. Nov 10, 2005) Memorandum in Support of
Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (NO. 05575JRT/FLN)
1852 Michael CUFFLEY and the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Petitioners, v. Joe MICKES, et al.,
Defendants., 1997 WL 34624352, *34624352 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mo.
1997) Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO.
497CV02110SNL)
1853 Bryan D. BALDWIN and Russell Lewis, Plaintiffs, v. Kent HILL, individually and in his official
capacity as the Director of the Kansas City Va Medical Center, Defendant., 2009 WL 5209007,
*5209007 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Mo. Oct 13, 2009) Defendant's Reply
Suggestion in Support of the Motion to Dismiss (NO. 409CV00325)
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1854 Dale REECE, Plaintiff, v. BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC; Joel J. Humphries; and Wallago Investments,
LLC, Defendants., 2009 WL 5901460, *5901460 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit)
(M.D.N.C. Dec 04, 2009) Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO.
109CV00632)
1855 OXFORD BAPTIST CHURCH and Reverend Joel A. Frye, Plaintiffs, v. CATAWBA COUNTY
SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION and Its Individual Board Members in their official and
individual capacities, and Scottie Houston, individually and in his official capacity as Principal,
River Bend Middle School, Defendants., 2002 WL 32728853, *32728853+ (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.N.C. Oct 04, 2002) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in
Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 502CV114-V)
1856 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEVADA, Gary Peck, Unitarian Universalist Social
Justice Committee, and Paul R. Brown, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Oscar Goodman,
in his official capacity as the Mayor, The Fremont Street Limited Liability Corp., and Joseph
Schillaci, in his official capacity as the President of The Fremont Street Limited Liability Corp.,
Defendants., 2004 WL 5506737, *5506737 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Nev. Nov
18, 2004) Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary
Judgment (NO. CV-S-97-01419-DWH, LRL)
1857 Donald SMITH, Plaintiff, Pro Se, v. SUN HARBOR BUDGET SUITES OF NEVADA, Budget
Suites of America, and Bigelow Management, Inc., Defendants., 2000 WL 34598453, *34598453
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Nev. Sep 06, 2000) Defendant Sun Harbor Budget
Suites of Nevada, Budget Suites of America, Bigelow Management, Inc's Reply to Plaintiff
Donald Smith's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State A ... (NO. CVS-00-0738-KJD(LRL)
1858 LIBERTY and Prosperity 1776, Inc. c/o Robert Bulkeley, Seth Grossman, Betty Lou Barnard, Bruce
Barkoff, Drew W. Barkoff, Robert Bulkeley, Judith Butler, Albert P. Garrett, Charles Lukens, Doris
Lukens, John G. Mayher, v. Jon CORZINE, State of New Jersey, Anne Milgram, New Jersey State
Police, County of Cape May, John F. Callinan, Township of Middle, Joseph Evangelista, Paul
Fritsch, Scott Webster, James D'Alonzo, Richard Smedberg, Middle Township Board of Education,
Walter, 2008 WL 7296801, *7296801+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.J. Oct 06,
2008) Brief in Oppostion to Motion to Dismiss (NO. 08-2642) "
HN: 1,9,11 (S.Ct.)
1859 LIBERTY AND PROSPERITY 1776, INC. c/o Robert Bulkeley, Seth Grossman, Betty Lou Barnard,
Bruce Barkoff, Drew W. Barkoff, Robert Bulkeley, Judith Butler, Albert P. Garrett, Charles Lukens,
Doris Lukens, John G. Mayher, v. Jon CORZINE, State of New Jersey, Anne Milgram, New Jersey
State Police, County of Cape May, John F. Callinan, Township of Middle, Joseph Evangelista, Paul
Fritsch, Scott Webster, James D'Alonzo, Richard Smedberg, Middle Township Board of Education,
Walter, 2008 WL 7296800, *7296800+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.J. Sep 22,
2008) Brief in Oppostion to Motion to Dismiss (NO. 08-2642) "
HN: 1,9,11 (S.Ct.)
1860 LIBERTY AND PROSPERITY 1776 INC. c/o Robert Bulkeley; Seth Grossman; Betty Lou Barnard;
Bruce Barkoff; Drew W. Barkoff, a Minor, by Bruce Barkoff; Robert Bulkeley; Judith Butler; Albert
P. Garrett; Charles Lukens; and, Doris Lukens f/k/a Doris Mann, v. Jon CORZINE; State of New
Jersey c/o Anne Milgram; Anne Milgram, Attorney General; New Jersey State Police; County of
Cape May; John F. Callinan; Middle Township; Joseph Evangelista; Paul Fritsch; Scott Webster;
James, 2008 WL 7296799, *7296799+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.J. Aug 28,
2008) Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint or in the alternative, an Order
Compelling a More Definite Statement and Seeking a Stay of Discovery (NO. 08-CV-2642,
JBS/JS)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1861 Veronica WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff, v. NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS; Marion A. Bolden, State
District Superintendent, Newark Public Schools; Lydia Silva, Assistant Superintendent, School
Leadership Team IV; Roy T. Wilson, Principal, Dr. E. Alma Flagg Elementary School, Defendants.,
2005 WL 3172698, *3172698+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.J. Oct 05, 2005)
Defendants' Brief in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (NO. 05-4008, KSH)
1862 Mamie MOORE, and James Maynard, Plaintiffs, v. THE ASBURY PARK BOARD OF
EDUCATION, Robert Disanto, President, Asbury Park Board of Education; Antonio Lewis,
Superintendent, Asbury Park Board of Education; Bernier, member, Asbury Park Board of
Education; Frank D'Allessandro, member, Asbury Park Board of Education; Garrett Giberson,
member, Asbury Park Board of Education; Adrienne Sanders, member, Asbury Park Board of
Education, Eileen Sonnier, member, Asbury Park, 2005 WL 1788702, *1788702+ (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.J. Jun 20, 2005) Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's
Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 305-CV-2971)
1863 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Philip G. BALCOMBE, Sansi G. Coonan, John S.
Dear, Michella A. Marusa, Martin J. Ryan and Eleanore M. Vouselas, Defendants., 2007 WL
7023190, *7023190+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.M. Jul 24, 2007)
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Charge Because Factual Basis is Conduct Protected by First
Amendment and Memorandum of Law in Support (NO. 07-207DJS) "
1864 Jimmy E. MCMILLAN III (AKA) James, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City
Police Department, Officer James Armstrong, Officer Karl Richards, and LT. Joseph Santangelo,
Defendants., 2007 WL 3094586, *3094586+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y.
Sep 20, 2007) Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for Summary
Judgment (NO. 03CV626, NG)
1865 Jimmy E. McMILLAN III (AKA) James, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City
Police Department, Officer James Armstrong, Officer Karl Richards, and LT. Joseph Santangelo,
Defendants., 2007 WL 3094587, *3094587 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y.
Sep 20, 2007) Defendants' Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Their Motion for
Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 (NO. 03CV626, SLT)
1866 Jimmy E. McMILLAN III (AKA) James, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City
Police Department, Officer James Armstrong, Officer Karl Richards, and Lt. Joseph Santangelo,
Defendants., 2006 WL 368454, *368454+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y. Jan
13, 2006) Defendants' Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Their Motion for
Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. (NO. 03CV626, SLT)
1867 David E. SCHLAFMAN, Plaintiff, v. STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT FARMINGDALE,
et al., Defendants., 2005 WL 2547948, *2547948 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit)
(E.D.N.Y. Aug 29, 2005) Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion for a
Preliminary Injunction (NO. CV05-732, TCP)

1868 John Robert ZELLNER, Plaintiff, v. State of New York, New York State Police Department, Trooper
Robert G. Summerlin, Major Weber, John Does 1-10, Defendants., 2004 WL 5455407, *5455407+
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y. Nov 10, 2004) Defendants' Motion in
Limine (NO. CV-02-0095)
1869 Burr V. DEITZ, Plaintiff, v. TRUSTCO BANK; United States; and Internal Revenue Service,
Defendants., 2005 WL 2104709, *2104709+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.N.Y.
Jun 01, 2005) Memorandum of Law (NO. 05-CV-0676LEK/RFT)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1870 Robert L. SCHULZ; Diane Lukaris; Raymond Bassette, Sr.; Keith Gilligan; Bruce Turnbull; Louis
Navarro; and Judith Porcaro, Plaintiffs, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS;
Andrew J. Williamson, individually and in his official capacity as Chairman of the Washington
County Board of Supervisors; Washington County Treasurer's Office; Phyllis Cooper, individually
and in her official capacity as Washington county Treasurer; Washington County Clerk's, 2004 WL
3513181, *3513181+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.N.Y. Nov 29, 2004)
Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (NO.
INDEX04-CV-1375LEX/R)
HN: 1 (S.Ct.)
1871 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. John MURTARI, Defendant., 2002 WL 34348888, *34348888
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.N.Y. Oct 17, 2002) Memorandum of Law (NO.
02-CR-369, GJD)
1872 NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, Nteu Chapter 47, and Frank Heffler, President
Nteu Chapter 47, Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION and General Services
Administration, Northeast and Caribbean Region, Defendants., 2005 WL 1803649, *1803649+ (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Jun 13, 2005) Government's Memorandum of
Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Injunctive Relief (NO. 055450, LAK)
1873 GENERAL MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. William J. PERRY, in his
official capacity as the Secretary of Defense, and the Department of Defense, Defendants., 1996 WL
34362144, *34362144 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Dec 09, 1996)
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (NO.
967525, SAS)
1874 Christopher FOX, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF KENT, Ohio, et al., Defendants., 2003 WL 23993860,
*23993860 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ohio 2003) Defendants' Response to
Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support (NO. 103CV1187)
1875 Christopher FOX, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF KENT, Ohio, et Al., Defendants., 2003 WL 23993863,
*23993863 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ohio 2003) Defendants' Reply to
Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition (NO. 103CV1187)
1876 Christopher FOX, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF KENT, Ohio, et al., Defendants., 2003 WL 23993868,
*23993868 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ohio 2003) Plaintiff's Reply Brief in
Support of his Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 103-CV-1187)
1877 Scott A. ROSS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CINCINNATI, et al., Defendants., 2009 WL 5057369,
*5057369+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ohio May 22, 2009) Motion for
Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, With Memorandum In Support
Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (NO. 09-369)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1878 STATE OF OKLAHOMA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TYSON FOODS, INC., et al., defendants., 2007 WL
5366971, *5366971+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Okla. Oct 03, 2007)
Defendants' Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss Count 6 of Second Amended Complaint
(NO. 405CV00329)
1879 STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. TYSON FOODS, INC., et al., Defendants., 2007 WL
5366949, *5366949 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Okla. Sep 04, 2007) State of
Oklahoma's Response to ""defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count 6 of Second Amended

Complaint'' (NO. 405CV00329)
1880 Greg WASSON, Plaintiff, v. State of Oregon, by and through Bill Bradbury, it's Secretary of State,
and Hardy Myers, it's Attorney General, Defendants., 2004 WL 3337114, *3337114 (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Or. Feb 18, 2004) Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for
Summary Judgment (NO. 03-6226-TC)
1881 Rebecca S. SWAIN, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF
BEAVERTON, Bruce A. Warner, Director of the Oregon Department of Transportation and Jim
McFarlane, Defendants., 2003 WL 24059033, *24059033+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and
Affidavit) (D.Or. Oct 14, 2003) Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment (NO. CV02-1162BR)
1882 CRADLE OF LIBERTY COUNCIL, INC., Boy Scouts of America, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF
PHILADELPHIA et al, Defendants., 2008 WL 7294831, *7294831 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and
Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. Jun 16, 2008) Brief in Support of Defendant City of Philadlephia's Rule
12(B)(6) Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (NO. 08CV2429RB)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1883 Joseph A. ARIETTA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ALLENTOWN, Joseph Blackburn, Ronald S.
Manescu, Frank Peters, and Roy Afflerbach, Defendants., 2006 WL 5281612, *5281612+ (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. Jun 30, 2006) Defendants' Memorandum of Law
on the Issue of the First Amendment and Local Ordinances (NO. 04-CV-5306)
1884 CONCHATTA, INC., t/d/b/a Club Risque on the Delaware and Gail Baker and Sabrina Barrar,
Plaintiffs, v. Col. Jeffrey B. MILLER, Defendant., 2004 WL 5542987, *5542987 (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. Jun 07, 2004) Defendant's Brief in Response to Plaintiffs'
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and in Support of Defendant's Cross-Motion for
Summary Judgment (NO. 01-1207)
1885 Wayne A. DREIBELBIS, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Todd SCHOLTON, State College Police Dept., Mark
Argiro, State College Police Dept., Eric Lesher, State College Police Dept., Richard Ososkie, State
College Police Department., Defendants., 2006 WL 403545, *403545+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum
and Affidavit) (M.D.Pa. Jan 05, 2006) Defendants Todd Scholton, Mark Argiro, Richard Ososkie,
and Eric Lesher's Brief in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint
Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) and for Summary ... (NO. 4CV05-2312)
1886 Joshua A. GLIDEWELL, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF GREENVILLE, Defendant., 2009 WL 5059997,
*5059997 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.S.C. Oct 13, 2009) Defendant's
Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injuction (NO. 609-CV-1932RBH) HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1887 Maurice BESSINGER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FOOD LION, INC., et al., Defendants., 2003 WL
24223556, *24223556+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.S.C. Sep 08, 2003)
Defendant Food Lion's Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended
Complaint (NO. 303-2828-17)
1888 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Vernon JACKSON, et al., 2009 WL 6662162, *6662162 (Trial
Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tenn. Jun 27, 2009) Motion for Judgment of Acquittal
or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial (NO. 07CR00051)
1889 Cabeb WILSON, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Joseph E. JOHNSON, Jan Simek, Paul Lee, Marlene Davis,
Edward Yovella, Ralph Moles, Robert Ed Cummings, and Scott Brooks, Defendants., 2005 WL
1363603, *1363603 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tenn. Jan 2005)
Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 304-CV-59)
1890 A. M. by and through her Parents and Guardians, Richard Dale McAllum, Jr. and Shelby Voda
McAllum; A. T. and M.t. by and through their Parents and Guardians, Darrell Ray Thomas and Joni
Ann Thomas, Plaintiffs, v. Paul Elliott CASH, In his official capacity as Principal of Burleson High
School, and the Board of Trustees of Burleson Independent School District, Defendants., 2008 WL
7328429, *7328429+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. Jan 02, 2008)
Defendants' Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 3-07CV0272-N)
HN:
11 (S.Ct.)
1891 A. M. by and through her Parents and Guardians, Richard Dale McAllum, Jr. and Shelby Voda
McAllum; A. T. by and through her Parents and Guardians, Darrell Ray Thomas and Joni Ann
Thomas, Plaintiffs, v. Paul Elliott CASH, in his official capacity as Principal of Burleson High
School, and the Board of Trustees of Burleson Independent School District, Defendants., 2007 WL
4830412, *4830412+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. May 01, 2007)
Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Application (Motion) for Preliminary Injunction and Brief
in Support (NO. 3-07CV0272-N)
1892 Matt BOURGAULT, Plaintiff, v. Mark YUDOF, Cullen M. Godfrey, Charles Miller, Dr. James
Spaniolo, Dr. Kent Gardner, Jeff Sorensen, and Sargeant Mark McCord, Defendants., 2004 WL
2232243, *2232243 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. Mar 31, 2004)
Defendants' Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 304CV0098-H)
1893 Khatia MADRID et al., Plaintiffs, v. David G. ANTHONY, et al., Defendant., 2007 WL 2981869,
*2981869+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Tex. Aug 08, 2007) Motion for
Summary Judgment of Defendant David G. Anthony (NO. H-06-1454)
1894 Jose RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. Timothy RUTTER and Jose Kluge, Defendants., 2007 WL 4851461,
*4851461+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Tex. Oct 26, 2007) Defendants
Timothy Rutter and Jose Kluge's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and/or Amended
Motion to Dismiss Based Upon Qualified Immunity and Brief in Support (NO. EP-07-CA-0115KC)
1895 TEXAS RIOGRANDE LEGAL AID, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT AGENCY, Defendant., 2007 WL 2455220, *2455220 (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Tex. Aug 24, 2007) Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition
to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and in Support of Fema's Motion to Dismiss
Preliminary Statement (NO. A-07-CA-691-SS)
HN: 11 (S.Ct.)
1896 JUSTICE FOR ALL, Jeremy Alder, and A. E. Smith, Plaintiffs, v. Dr. Larry FAULKNER, et al.,
Defendants., 2003 WL 25709911, *25709911 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Tex.
Oct 02, 2003) Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary
Judgment (NO. 102CV00630)
1897 Kenneth R. IVORY, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WEST JORDAN; West Jordan City
Council; Donna Evans; in her official and personal capacities; Gary Luebbers, in his official and
personal capacities; Andrew Allison, in his official and personal capacities; Lyle Summers, in his
official and personal capacities; Carolyn Nelson, in her official and personal capacities; Kevin
Watkins, in his official and personal capacities; Ryan Carter, in his official and, 2005 WL 3197977,
*3197977+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Nov 09, 2005) Reply
Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Claims Seventeen
and Eighteen of Plaintiff's Complaint (NO. 203CV-0190TC)
*1988946 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Jun 01, 2005) Memorandum in
Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Claims Seventeen and Eighteen of
Plaintiff's Complaint (NO. 203CV-0190TC)
*1990425 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Jun 01, 2005) Memorandum in
Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Claims Seventeen and Eighteen of
Plaintiff's Complaint (NO. 203CV-0190TC)
1900 Kenneth R. IVORY, individually and as a taxpayer of West Jordan City, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WEST
JORDAN, a Utah Political Corporation, West Jordan City Council, Donna Evans, in her official and
personal capacity, Gary Luebbers, in his official and personal capacity, Andrew Allison, in his
official and personal capacity, Lyle Summers, in his official and personal capacity, Carolyn Nelson,
in her official and personal capacity, Kevin Watkins, in his official and personal capacity,, 2003 WL
24136551, *24136551+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Nov 11, 2003)
Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 203CV-0190TC)
*24136550+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Aug 15, 2003) Memorandum in
Support of Defendants' Motion Dismiss Complaint (NO. 203CV-0190TC)
1902 Scott HUMINSKI, Plaintiff, v. RUTLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; Deputy Sheriff
R.J.Elrick; Honorable Nancy Corsones; Honorable Patricia Zimmerman; Karen Predom, Clerk,
Rutland DistrictCourt, Defendants., 2005 WL 5419906, *5419906 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and
Affidavit) (D.Vt. Mar 12, 2005) Defendant Predom's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to
Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 199-CV-160)
1903 Scott HUMINSKI, Plaintiff, v. RUTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants., 2002 WL
34193812, *34193812+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Vt. Mar 12, 2002)
Defendants Sheriff R.J. Elrick, and Rutland County Sheriff's Dept.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's
Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 199-CV-160)
1904 Scott HUMINSKI, Plaintiff, v. RUTLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; Deputy Sheriff
R.J. Elrick; Honorable Nancy Corsones; Honorable Patricia Zimmerman; Karen Predom, Clerk,
Rutland DistrictCourt, Defendants., 2002 WL 34349074, *34349074+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum
and Affidavit) (D.Vt. Feb 01, 2002) Defendant Karen Predom's Motion for Summary Judgment
Jurisdiction and Motion to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction (NO. 199CV00160)
1905 Scott HUMINSKI, Plaintiff, v. RUTLAND COUNTY; Rutland County Sheriff's Department; Deputy
Sheriff R.J. Elrick; Honorable Nancy Corsones; Honorable Patricia Zimmerman; Karen Predom,
Clerk, Rutland District Court; Rutland District Court, Defendants., 2001 WL 36090921, *36090921+
(Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Vt. Mar 05, 2001) State Defendants' Memorandum
of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint and to Dissolve the
Preliminary Injunction as to State Defendants (NO. 199CV00160)
1906 Scott HUMINSKI, Plaintiff., v. RUTLAND COUNTY; Rutland County Sheriff's Department;
Deputy Sheriff R.J.Elrick; Honorable Nancy Corsones; Honorable Patricia Zimmerman;) Karen
Predom, Clerk, Rutland District Court; Rutland District Court, Defendants., 2001 WL 36090917,
*36090917+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Vt. Feb 13, 2001) State Defendants'
Memorandum of Law in Response to Plaintiff's Second Motion to Amend and in Opposition to
Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 199CV00160)
1907 THE CONSTITUTION PARTY OF WEST VIRGINIA, Denzil W. Sloan and Jeff Becker, Plaintiffs,
v. Frank JEZIORO, Director of the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Sam England,
Superintendent of Stonewall Jackson Lake State Park, Scott Warner, and John Does 1 and 2,
Defendants., 2009 WL 5081464, *5081464+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.W.Va.
Apr 17, 2009) Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Or
Summary Judgment (NO. 208-CV-61) "
HN: 10,11 (S.Ct.)
1908 William AYERS Meghan Lanker, Plaintiff(s), v. UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING Tom Buchanan, in
his official capacity, Defendants., 2010 WL 1867968, *1867968 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and
Affidavit) (D.Wyo. Apr 24, 2010) Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO.
10-CV-00079-WFD) "
HN: 10 (S.Ct.)
1909 Frank WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff, v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF DEFENDANT
CORRECTION, Defendant., 2008 WL 7728811, *7728811 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and
Affidavit) (Ark.Cir. Jun 20, 2008) Brief in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary
Judgment (NO. CV2008-4891-6)
1910 PARAGON VILLAS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, v. Ricky LOPEZ, et al,
Defendants., 2005 WL 5189692, *5189692 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit)
(Cal.Superior Feb 28, 2005) Supplement to Trial Brief Points and Authorities re: Constitutional
Considerations of Prior Restraint and Judicial Admissions Against Interest of Plaintiff (NO.
PC034494)
1911 Theresa LANTZ, v. William B. COLEMAN., 2009 WL 6446353, *6446353 (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (Conn.Super. Jun 01, 2009) Post-Trial Brief of Defendant William
Coleman (NO. HHD-CV-08-4034912-S)
1912 Bella I. SAFRO, Plaintiff, v. James E. KENNEDY, individually, and K-VA-T Food Stores, Inc. d/b/a
Food City, and ABC Security Company, Defendants., 2006 WL 6558277, *6558277 (Trial Motion,
Memorandum and Affidavit) (Tenn.Cir.Ct. Feb 22, 2006) Memorandum of Law in Support of
Food City and Kennedy's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 3-428-05)
Jury Instructions
1913 Robert MORAN, Plaintiff, v. Bill CAMERON and John Davenport, Defendants., 2008 WL 7192106,
*7192106 (Jury Instruction) (M.D.Fla. Jul 31, 2008) Court's Instructions to the Jury (NO. 207CV-257-FTM-29DNF) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1914 Cynthia KENNEDY, Plaintiff, v. Stuart M. CHASE, in his individual capacity, and the Town of
Danvers, Defendants., 2006 WL 2881879, *2881879 (Jury Instruction) (D.Mass. Sep 11, 2006)
Plaintiff's Proposed Jury Instructions (NO. 05-10191-GAO)
HN: 9 (S.Ct.)
1915 Steven E. LANDIS, Plaintiff, v. Dave PHALEN, Fairfield County Sheriff, et al., Defendants., 2007
WL 4745264, *4745264 (Jury Instruction) (S.D.Ohio Sep 24, 2007) Proposed Jury Instructions
(NO. C2-05-649)
1916 Harold LISCHNER, Plaintiff, v. UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP and Officer Michael Kehrle,
Defendants., 2007 WL 4267688, *4267688 (Jury Instruction) (E.D.Pa. Nov 30, 2007) Defendant,
Upper Darby Township's Proposed Points for Charge%n1%n (NO. 05-CV-4546)

Adderley V State of Fla - Effect of An Ignorant Public

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Adderley V State of Fla - Effect of An Ignorant Public

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

87 S.Ct.

2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

Supreme Court of the United States

protest against jail and other segregation policies had

Argued Oct. 18, 1966.

[4] Trespass 386

2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

Representation, Misconduct, or Bad Faith

2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

FN1. Every trespass upon the property of

2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

nowhere in deciding this case.

anything to disperse the crowd, and one of them told the

2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

Petitions to the house of commons in case of

2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

curtailed. The greater the importance of safeguarding the

the streets, and camped mostly in parks and other

*56 Today a trespass law is used to penalize people for

2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

Date of Printing: Aug 21, 2010

Negative Citing References (U.S.A.)

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

U.S. Appellate Briefs

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

Date of Printing: Aug 21, 2010

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

Date of Printing: Aug 21, 2010

Limitation of Holding Recognized by

Positive Cases (U.S.A.)

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

5107) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

Cir.(Colo.) Dec 01, 1981) (NO. 80-1534) " HN: 10 (S.Ct.)

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

06-199) HN: 9 (S.Ct.)

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

0335) HN: 12 (S.Ct.)

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.

2010 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.