Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

Computing Theory

Individual Assignment

Page 1 of 2

Assignment Marking Scheme

NAME :

ID :

Criteria (PART-A)

Excellent

Good

Marks
Average Poor

Very
Poor

1. Correctness of the application of


rules.

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1/0)

2. Representation of logic using State


Transition table

(9-10)

(7-8)

(5-6)

(3-4)

(0-2)

3. Conversion of State Transition table


to NFA Diagram

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1/0)

4. Discussion and Critical Appraisal by


applying acceptable inputs.

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1/0)

Marks
Average

Poor

Very
Poor

SUB-TOTAL (T1 out of 25 Marks)

Criteria (PART-B)

Excellent

5. Correctness of usage of rules present


in state elimination method.

Good

(9-10)

(7-8)

(5-6)

(3-4)

(0-2)

for

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1/0)

7. Explanation for the rules applied in


each step.

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1/0)

8. Discussion and Critical Appraisal

(5)

(4)

(3)

(2)

(1/0)

6. Step by Step elimination


obtaining regular expression.

SUB-TOTAL (T2 out of 25 Marks)


Total Marks = (T1 + T2) *2

Level 1

Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation

2016

Computing Theory

Individual Assignment

Page 2 of 2

Comments:

Performance Criteria
The criteria used to evaluate the assignment are as follows:
PART - A

Degree of correctness of the rules applied.

Explanation of the state transition diagram.

Appropriateness for constructing NFA diagram

Depth of discussion and Critical Appraisal for acceptable inputs.

PART - B

Degree of correctness of the rules applied.

Explanation of the rules used in state elimination method

Step by step description for obtaining the regular expression.

Representation of the Regular Expression with proper syntax.

Level 1

Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation

2016

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi