Scribd Logo
Importer

Bienvenue sur Scribd !

  • Anthony Brooks v. United States, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Transféré par

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 vues2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Anthony Eugene Brooks appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its July 31, 2013 opinion. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials.

    Description originale:

    Filed: 2013-12-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-7522

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Formats disponibles

    PDF ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd

    Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

    Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

    Signaler ce document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Anthony Eugene Brooks appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its July 31, 2013 opinion. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials.

    Droits d'auteur :

    Public Domain
    Téléchargez comme PDF ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    2 vues2 pages

    Anthony Brooks v. United States, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Transféré par

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Anthony Eugene Brooks appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its July 31, 2013 opinion. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials.

    Droits d'auteur :

    Public Domain
    Téléchargez comme PDF ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    sur 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-7522

    ANTHONY EUGENE BROOKS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Beckley.
    Irene C. Berger,
    District Judge. (5:10-cv-01340)

    Submitted:

    December 19, 2013

    Decided:

    December 24, 2013

    Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony Eugene Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony

    Eugene

    Brooks

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and


    dismissing

    his

    complaint

    filed

    pursuant

    to

    the

    Federal

    Tort

    Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680 (West 2006 &


    Supp. 2013), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
    Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.


    States,
    dispense

    No.

    5:10-cv-01340

    with

    contentions

    are

    oral

    (S.D.W.

    argument

    adequately

    Va.

    because

    presented

    in

    July
    the
    the

    Brooks v. United
    31,

    2013).

    We

    facts

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    Vous aimerez peut-être aussi