Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
No. 10-4941
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District
Judge. (2:08-cr-00930-DCN-7)
Submitted:
SHEDD,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
HAMILTON,
Senior
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Lee Johnson pled guilty to conspiracy to possess
with intent to distribute and to distribute a quantity of heroin
and three counts of possession with intent to distribute and
distribution
concluded
of
that
quantity
Johnson
of
heroin.
qualified
as
The
district
court
Career
Offender
under
of
challenges
151
his
months
imprisonment.
sentence.
As
On
explained
appeal,
below,
we
Johnson
vacate
defendant
convictions
of
must
either
substance offense.
have
at
crime
of
least
violence
USSG 4B1.1(a).
two
or
prior
a
felony
controlled
below and does not dispute on appeal that his 2004 conviction,
pursuant to a guilty plea in South Carolina state court, for
possession with intent to distribute marijuana qualifies as a
prior felony conviction for a controlled substance offense under
USSG
4B1.1(a).
However,
Johnson
challenged
below
and
nature
(ABHAN)
under
- 2 -
South
Carolinas
common
law
This
crime
USSG
of
violence
under
the
Guidelines
Career
Offender
Cir. 2011).
the
as
offense
defined
by
the
relevant
law,
rather
than
constitute
crime
of
approach,
the
offenses
including
the
least
within
the
applicable
violence
full
culpable
range
under
of
proscribed
Guidelines
For an offense
th[e
categorical]
proscribed
conduct,
definition
Sykes
of
conduct,
must
that
fall
term.
such
that
some
- 3 -
commissions
of
the
offense
generic
elements
of
the
offense
to
the
specific
Id. at *3.
conduct
This is known as
the
record
of
conviction,
which
includes
the
Id.
employing
concluded
the
that
categorical
South
Carolinas
approach,
common
the
law
district
offense
of
an
opinion
on
whether
the
offense
of
Without
ABHAN
under
under
USSG
4B1.1(a),
we
have
decided
the
prudent
remand
this
case
to
the
district
court
for
further
crime
of
violence
- 4 -
under
USSG
4B1.1(a).
See
Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211, 218 (1974) (We think
it inadvisable . . . to reach out . . . to pass on important
questions
of
statutory
construction
when
simpler,
and
more
present
guilty
plea
transcript
hearing
with
of
the
plea
respect
to
colloquy
his
2008
from
Johnsons
conviction
for
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
We
legal
- 5 -