Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
No. 11-7608
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge; Bristow Marchant, Magistrate Judge.
(4:10-cv00157-BM)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Corey Jawan Robinson appeals from the jury verdict on
one
of
his
Defendants
claims
on
(2006) action.
the
and
the
remaining
grant
claims
of
in
summary
his
42
judgment
U.S.C.
to
1983
have reviewed the record and the allegations on appeal and find
no reversible error.
On
numerous
errors.
received
appeal,
he
court-appointed
asserts
Because
that
counsel
trial
was
not
counsel
counsel
for
the
committed
constitutionally
536, 541 (8th Cir. 1988); Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv.,
785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986).
1237.
Finally, Robinson challenges the jury verdict in favor
of Defendant Mosher, contending that the jury instructions were
incomplete or inaccurate.
the
appeal
question.
of
is
frivolous
and
demonstrating
Nemours
not
&
Co.,
substantiality.
presents
substantial
Maloney
940
E.I.
939,
substantial
question
[is]
debatable.
one
which
1976).
de
F.2d
Cir.
DuPont
396
(D.C.
v.
is
reasonably
to
meet
his
burden
of
substantiality.
Robinson has
Thus,
he
has
jury verdict.
We
deny
Robinsons
motions
for
preparation
of