Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
No. 14-1582
ERIC FLORES,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Attorney Rhonda
Jackson; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, United States
Attorney General,
Respondents.
On Petition
Education.
Submitted:
for
Review
of
an
Order
of
the
Decided:
Department
of
PER CURIAM:
Eric
review
of
Flores
an
has
agency
filed
order,
self-styled
alleging
petition
discrimination
for
and
States
Department
of
Education
(Department)
did
not
thereby
preventing
the
issuance
of
sanctions
(2)
directing
the
Deputy
Assistant
Secretary
for
of
the
Act;
and
Department of Justice.
(4)
referring
his
complaints
to
the
We deny in
Writs of
writs is available only when the party seeking relief shows that
his
right
to
relief
is
clear
and
indisputable,
United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 517 (4th Cir. 2003)
(internal quotation marks omitted), and that he has no other
adequate means to attain the relief he desires.
Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980).
Allied Chem.
The relief
In the motion to
only
courts
that
are
power
courts
of
authorized
limited
by
jurisdiction
Constitution
and
The
Id.
Contrary to Flores
he
relies,
34
C.F.R.
Pt.
100
(2013),
do
not
confer
be
based
on
the
provisions
of
the
Administrative
Further, insofar as
Flores
Rules
relies
on
Rule
15
of
the
Federal
of
Appellate
and
legal
contentions
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED IN PART
AND DISMISSED IN PART