Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
No. 12-1667
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Goitom Mogos-Habte, a native and citizen of Eritrea,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals
(Board)
dismissing
his
appeal
from
the
immigration
determination
regarding
eligibility
for
asylum
or
evidence
on
the
record
considered
of
fact,
including
findings
on
as
whole.
Administrative
credibility,
are
Legal
de
issues
are
reviewed
novo,
affording
appropriate
INS,
296
F.3d
316,
325
n.14
(4th
Cir.
2002).
Furthermore,
conclusive
unless
manifestly
abuse of discretion.
contrary
to
the
law
and
an
substantial
evidence
supports
the
agencys
finding
that
or
well-founded
fear
of
future
persecution
on
is
necessarily
ineligible
for
withholding
of
removal
have
also
reviewed
the
denial
of
Mogos-Habtes
See Onyeme v.
INS, 146 F.3d 227, 234 (4th Cir. 1998) (setting forth standard
of
review).
demonstrate
As
that
found
the
by
the
evidence
Board,
he
sought
Mogos-Habte
to
present
failed
to
was
not
former hearing.
We further
exception
set
forth
in
C.F.R.
1003.1(d)(3)(iv)
(2012).
Accordingly,
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
we
deny
argument
adequately
the
petition
because
presented
in
the
the
for
facts
review.
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED