Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
No. 05-4202
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CR-02-1173-JFA)
Submitted:
Decided:
Judge Luttig was a member of the original panel but did not
participate in this decision. This opinion is filed by quorum of
the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 46(d).
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Hood appeals his conviction and sentence imposed
after he pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with
intent to distribute fifty grams or more of cocaine base or crack
cocaine and five kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
841(b)(1)(A), 846 (2000).
brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), stating
there were no meritorious issues, but raising the issue of whether
the district court complied with Rule 11 in accepting Hoods guilty
plea and whether the life sentence was required.
counsel
was
ineffective
for
not
Insofar as Hood
challenging
the
drug
- 2 -
615,
619
n.5
(4th
Cir.
2000).
Because
the
record
is
We therefore
If the client
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -