Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
No. 09-7410
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:03-cr-00195-JRS-3)
Submitted:
Decided:
Alejandro
Assistant
Appellee.
PER CURIAM:
Alejandro
Reyes
appeals
the
district
courts
order
See
USSG 2D1.1(c) (2007 & Supp. 2008); USSG App. C Amend. 706.
The district court concluded that Reyes was not entitled to the
benefit of Amendment 706 because he was sentenced as a career
offender.
follow, we conclude that the Amendment would not have the effect
of lowering Reyes guideline range.
United
States
(holding
we
v.
may
Smith,
affirm
395
on
F.3d
any
We accordingly affirm.
516,
519
grounds
(4th
apparent
Cir.
See
2005)
from
the
record).
Under 3582(c)(2), the district court may reduce the
sentence of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of
imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently
been
lowered
by
the
Sentencing
Commission
if
such
defendants
does
applicable
1B1.10(a)(2)(B),
USSG
2D1.1
not
p.s.
that
have
the
effect
guideline
Amendment
lowered
the
lowering
range.
706,
base
of
the
2007
offense
the
USSG
amendment
levels
for
to
most
USSG
1B1.10(c), p.s.
Reyes
heroin
and
28
was
held
responsible
kilograms
of
for
cocaine
13.58
kilograms
hydrochloride,
of
which
was sentenced under USSG 2D1.1, his base offense level was not
based on the quantity of cocaine base for which he was held
accountable, but rather on the amount of the other controlled
substances for which he was held accountable, namely heroin and
cocaine hydrochloride.
Amendment 706 went into effect, Reyes total offense level would
remain 38, the career offender enhancement would not apply, and
3
his
guideline
range
2D1.1(D)(ii)(II),
not
have
the
effect
would
remain
4B1.1(b).
of
the
same.
Therefore,
lowering
Reyes
See
Amendment
guideline
706
range,
USSG
does
and