Scribd Logo
Importer

Bienvenue sur Scribd !

  • United States v. Prescod, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Transféré par

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 vues2 pages
    William Alfred Prescod, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion as stated in its June 1, 2009 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Description originale:

    Filed: 2009-12-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7125

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Formats disponibles

    PDF ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd

    Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

    Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

    Signaler ce document
    William Alfred Prescod, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion as stated in its June 1, 2009 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Droits d'auteur :

    Public Domain
    Téléchargez comme PDF ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    8 vues2 pages

    United States v. Prescod, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Transféré par

    Scribd Government Docs
    William Alfred Prescod, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion as stated in its June 1, 2009 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Droits d'auteur :

    Public Domain
    Téléchargez comme PDF ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    sur 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7125

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    WILLIAM ALFRED PRESCOD, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
    Richard L.
    Voorhees, District Judge. (5:99-cr-00029-RLV-1)

    Submitted:

    November 19, 2009

    Decided:

    December 2, 2009

    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William Alfred Prescod, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth


    Ray,
    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Asheville,
    North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    William

    Alfred

    Prescod,

    Jr.,

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582 (2006) motion.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United

    States

    (W.D.N.C. June 1, 2009).

    v.

    Prescod,

    No.

    5:99-cr-00029-RLV-1

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    Vous aimerez peut-être aussi