Scribd Logo
Importer

Bienvenue sur Scribd !

  • Abdullah v. Sumter County, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Transféré par

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 vues2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Muttaqin F. Abdullah under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Sumter County Detention Center and several officers. The district court denied relief to Abdullah and the Fourth Circuit affirmed that decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Description originale:

    Filed: 2007-03-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6624

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Formats disponibles

    PDF ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd

    Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

    Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

    Signaler ce document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Muttaqin F. Abdullah under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Sumter County Detention Center and several officers. The district court denied relief to Abdullah and the Fourth Circuit affirmed that decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Droits d'auteur :

    Public Domain
    Téléchargez comme PDF ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    4 vues2 pages

    Abdullah v. Sumter County, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Transféré par

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Muttaqin F. Abdullah under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Sumter County Detention Center and several officers. The district court denied relief to Abdullah and the Fourth Circuit affirmed that decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Droits d'auteur :

    Public Domain
    Téléchargez comme PDF ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    sur 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6624

    MUTTAQIN F. ABDULLAH,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SUMTER
    COUNTY
    DETENTION
    CENTER;
    CAPTAIN
    GRIFFIN; CORPORAL NOBLES; JASON TASSCONE,
    Officer; MRS. JOE, Nurse,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
    (6:04-cv-23005-HFF)

    Submitted:

    August 31, 2006

    Decided:

    March 1, 2007

    Before WILLIAMS and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Muttaqin F. Abdullah, Appellant Pro Se. John Evans James, III,


    LEE, ERTER, WILSON, JAMES, HOLLER & SMITH, L.L.C., Sumter, South
    Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Muttaqin F. Abdullah appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge and the district
    court.

    Abdullah v. Sumter County Detention Ctr., No. 6:04-cv-

    23005-HFF (D.S.C. Mar. 14, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    Vous aimerez peut-être aussi