Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49848146
CITATIONS
READS
69
331
2 AUTHORS:
Derek D Delmonte
Terry Kim
Duke University
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
REVIEW/UPDATE
The importance of the cornea to the ocular structure and visual system is often overlooked
because of the corneas unassuming transparent nature. The cornea lacks the neurobiological
sophistication of the retina and the dynamic movement of the lens; yet, without its clarity, the
eye would not be able to perform its necessary functions. The complexity of structure and function
necessary to maintain such elegant simplicity is the wonder that draws us to one of the most
important components of our visual system.
Financial Disclosure: Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or
method mentioned.
J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37:588598 Q 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS
Editors Note: In this issue, we begin a series of review articles that will provide a framework for understanding what
we do and do not know about corneal biomechanics and
methods to evaluate this important topic. The article in
this issue provides a basic understanding of corneal anatomy and physiology. Subsequent articles, which will be
published during 2011, will review the status of the corneal
endothelium after refractive surgery and provide an introduction to our understanding of corneal biomechanics and
the means by which we measure corneal biomechanical
properties, including topography, tomography, and wavefront analysis.
The cornea is a transparent avascular connective tissue that acts as the primary infectious and structural
barrier of the eye. Together with the overlying tear
film, it also provides a proper anterior refractive surface for the eye. Its clarity is the result of many factors
including the structural anatomy and physiology of its
cellular components. In this article, we describe the
intricate and delicate balance of cellular components
and factors that create the most important refractive
component of our ocular system.
588
589
Figure 1. Light micrograph of normal endothelium (original magnification 100). Note the single-cell endothelial layer with a Descemet
membrane of uniform thickness (epithelial surface at top of figure).
Reprinted with permission of Ophthalmology.4 Copyright 2008
Elsevier.
590
Bowman Layer
Bowman layer (or Bowman membrane) lies just anterior to the stroma and is not a true membrane but
rather the acellular condensate of the most anterior
portion of the stroma. This smooth layer is approximately 15 mm thick and helps the cornea maintain its
shape. When disrupted, it will not regenerate and
can form a scar (Figure 4).
Stroma
The corneal stroma provides the bulk of the structural framework of the cornea and comprises roughly
80% to 85% of its thickness. Embryologically, it is the
result of a second wave of neural crest migration that
occurs in the seventh week of gestation, after establishment of the primitive endothelium. The stroma differs
from other collagenous structures in its transparency,
which is the result of precise organization of the stromal fibers and extracellular matrix (ECM).10,11 The collagen fibers are arranged in parallel bundles called
fibrils, and these fibrils are packed in parallel arranged
layers or lamellae. The stroma of the human eye contains 200 to 250 distinct lamella, each layer arranged
at right angles relative to fibers in adjacent lamellae.11
The peripheral stroma is thicker than the central
591
crystallins, representing 25% to 30% of soluble protein in the cells. These crystallins appear to be responsible for reducing backscatter of light from the
keratocytes and maintaining corneal transparency.15
Descemet Membrane
Endothelium
The endothelial layer of the cornea maintains corneal clarity by ensuring it remains in a relatively
deturgesced state. The intact human endothelium is
a monolayer, which appears as a honeycomb-like
mosaic when viewed from the posterior side (Figure 7).
In early embryogenesis, the posterior cornea is lined
with a neural crest-derived monolayer of orderly arranged cuboidal cells.16 Over time, these cells flatten
and become tightly adherent to one another. Immediately anterior to the flattened layer is a discontinuous
homogeneous acellular layer, which in time becomes
Descemet membrane.17 At birth, the endothelial
monolayer is approximately 10 mm thick and consists
of a uniform thickness layer of cells that spans the entire posterior corneal surface and fuses with the cells of
the trabecular meshwork.17 Similarly, Descemet membrane becomes continuous and uniform, fusing
peripherally with the trabecular beams.17 The fusion
site, known as Schwalbe line, is a gonioscopic landmark that defines the end of Descemet membrane
and the start of the trabecular meshwork.
The individual cells continue to flatten over time
and stabilize at approximately 4 mm in thickness in
adulthood. Adjacent cells share extensive lateral interdigitations and possess gap and tight junctions along
their lateral borders. The lateral membranes contain
a high density of NaC, KC-ATPase pump sites.18
The basal surface of the endothelium contains numerous hemidesmosomes that promote adhesion to
Descemet membrane.
Endothelial cell density and topography continue
to change throughout life. From the second to eighth
592
593
594
segment surgery that has the potential to lead to significant endothelial cell loss in some cases.40 It is estimated that Descemet detachment occurs in 0.5% of
cataract surgeries; although most injuries remain small
and localized to the wound, some can extend to the
visual axis, resulting in significant morbidity.41 It
must be remembered that healing of Descemet breaks
requires endothelial cell migration and deposition of
a new basement membrane, a process that is much easier if the edges remain in close proximity. For this reason, many surgeons place air or gas bubbles in the
anterior chamber of the eye to hold the loose membrane tags against the posterior cornea as the healing
process takes place or, in larger detachments, use
a 10-0 nylon suture to reappose the detachment
mechanically.42,43
One of the most serious complications after intraocular surgery is corneal edema, which was noted
frequently during the early years of phacoemulsification surgery and is largely due to endothelial damage
at the time of surgery. In several studies, 4446 the central endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification
ranges from 4% to 25%. Many factors likely affect the
corneal endothelium during a phacoemulsification
procedure and these can be divided into 4 groups:
(1) direct mechanical trauma to the endothelium
from the incision and inadvertent touch of the endothelium by lens fragments, instruments, or intraocular
lenses during the procedure; (2) ultrasound energy
affecting the endothelium directly or (3) via the generation of hydroxyl radicals; and (4) the biochemical and
mechanical effects of the irrigating solution (nature,
volume, turbulence).47,48
Direct trauma to the endothelium is a risk when instruments or other objects are placed in the confined
space of the anterior chamber. Care must be taken to
avoid touching the delicate endothelial cells inadvertently, as even minor trauma can result in significant
cell death. This is supported by studies reporting
that dense nuclear fragments floating in the anterior
chamber with high turbulence are a risk for endothelial trauma.49,50 For this reason, Osher51 and others
suggest a slow motion phacoemulsification technique that may minimize this trauma.
One major advance in intraocular surgery is ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) (composed of
hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, chondroitin sulfate,
or sodium hyaluronate). These devices significantly
protect the endothelium against intraoperative
trauma.52 Different OVDs have different physical
properties (eg, rheology, shear rate, and osmotic
strength) and may provide different levels of endothelial protection from mechanical and ultrasonic insults.
The ultrasonic energy delivered to the eye during
phacoemulsification is important for removing
595
596
7. Hanna C, Bicknell DS, OBrien JE. Cell turnover in the adult human eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1961; 65:695698
8. Wiley L, SundarRaj N, Sun T-T, Thoft RA. Regional heterogeneity in human corneal and limbal epithelia: an immunohistochemical evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32:594602.
Available at: http://www.iovs.org/content/32/3/594.full.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2010
9. Li W, Hayashida Y, Chen Y-T, Tseng SCG. Niche regulation of
corneal epithelial stem cells at the limbus. Cell Res 2007;
17:2636. Available at: http://www.nature.com/cr/journal/v17/
n1/pdf/7310137a.pdf. Accessed December 1, 2010
10. Boote C, Dennis S, Newton RH, Puri H, Meek KM. Collagen
fibrils appear more closely packed in the prepupillary cornea: optical and biomechanical implications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
2003; 44:29412948. Available at: http://www.iovs.org/content/
44/7/2941.full.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2010
11. Maurice DM. The transparency of the corneal stroma [letter].
Vision Res 1970; 10:107108
12. Meek KM, Boote C. The organization of collagen in the corneal
stroma. Exp Eye Res 2004; 78:503512
13. Gipson IK, Joyce NC. Anatomy and cell biology of the cornea,
superficial limbus, and conjunctiva. In: Albert DM,
Jakobiec FA, eds, Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology,
3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 2008; 423420
14. Fini ME, Stramer BM. How the cornea heals; cornea-specific repair mechanisms affecting surgical outcomes. Cornea 2005; 24
(suppl 1):S2S11
15. Jester JV, Moller-Pedersen T, Huang J, Sax CM, Kays WT,
Cavangh HD, Petroll WM, Piatigorsky J. The cellular basis of
corneal transparency: evidence for corneal crystallins. J Cell
Sci 1999; 112:613622. Available at: http://jcs.biologists.org/
cgi/reprint/112/5/613. Accessed November 23, 2010
16. Beebe DC, Coats JM. The lens organizes the anterior segment:
specification of neural crest cell differentiation in the avian eye. Dev
Biol 2000; 220:424431. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.
com/science?_obZMImg&_imagekeyZB6WDG-45K169G-1K-1&_
cdiZ6766&_userZ10&_piiZS0012160600996386&_originZsearch&_
coverDateZ04%2F15%2F2000&_skZ997799997&viewZc&wchpZ
dGLzVtb-zSkWA&md5Zb03e6a3a34ab49b6ae0cfdeb15674485&
ieZ/sdarticle.pdf. Accessed November 23, 2010
17. Watsky MA, McDermott ML, Edelhauser HF. In vitro corneal
endothelial permeability in rabbit and human: the effects of
age, cataract surgery and diabetes. Exp Eye Res 1989; 49:
751767
18. Stiemke MM, Edelhauser HF, Geroski DH. The developing
corneal endothelium: correlation of morphology, hydration and
Na/K ATPase pump site density. Curr Eye Res 1991; 10:
145156
19. Yee RW, Matsuda M, Schultz RO, Edelhauser HF. Changes in
the normal corneal endothelial cellular pattern as a function of
age. Curr Eye Res 1985; 4:671678
20. Bourne WM, Nelson LR, Hodge DO. Central corneal endothelial
cell changes over a ten-year period. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
1997; 38:779782. Available at: http://www.iovs.org/content/
38/3/779.full.pdf. Accessed November 23, 2010
21. Geroski DH, Matsuda M, Yee RW, Edelhauser HF. Pump function of the human corneal endothelium; effects of age and cornea guttata. Ophthalmology 1985; 92:759763; discussion by
J Sugar, 763
22. Polse KA, Brand RJ, Cohen SR, Guillon M. Hypoxic effects on
corneal morphology and function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
1990; 31:15421554. Available at: http://www.iovs.org/content/
31/8/1542.full.pdf. Accessed November 23, 2010
23. Oliveira-Soto L, Efron N. Morphology of corneal nerves using
confocal microscopy. Cornea 2001; 20:374384
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
597
598
56. Cameron MD, Poyer JF, Aust SD. Identification of free radicals
produced during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg
2001; 27:463470
57. Riesz P, Kondo T. Free radical formation induced by ultrasound
and its biological implications. Free Radic Biol Med 1992;
13:247270
58. Ko Y-C, Liu CJ-I, Lau L-I, Wu C-W, Chou JC, Hsu W-M. Factors
related to corneal endothelial damage after phacoemulsification
in eyes with occludable angles. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;
34:4651
59. Vasavada AR, Praveen MR, Vasavada VA, Vasavada VA,
Raj SM, Asnani PK, Garg VS. Impact of high and low aspiration parameters on postoperative outcomes of phacoemulsification: randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36:588593
60. Gonnering R, Edelhauser HF, Van Horn DL, Durant W. The pH
tolerance of rabbit and human corneal endothelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1979; 18:373390. Available at: http://www.iovs.
org/content/18/4/373.full.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2010
61. Edelhauser HF, Hanneken AM, Pederson HJ, Van Horn DL. Osmotic tolerance of rabbit and human corneal endothelium. Arch
Ophthalmol 1981; 99:12811287. Available at: http://archopht.
ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/99/7/1281. Accessed November 24,
2010
62. Breebaart AC, Nuyts RMMA, Pels E, Edelhauser HF,
Verbraak FD. Toxic endothelial cell destruction of the cornea
after routine extracapsular cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol
1990; 108:11211125. Available at: http://archopht.amaassn.org/cgi/reprint/108/8/1121.pdf. Accessed November 24,
2010
63. Ayaki M, Yaguchi S, Iwasawa A, Koide R. Cytotoxicity of ophthalmic solutions with and without preservatives to human corneal endothelial cells, epithelial cells and conjunctival epithelial
cells. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008; 36:553559
64. Mamalis N, Edelhauser HF, Dawson DG, Chew J, LeBoyer RM,
Werner L. Toxic anterior segment syndrome. J Cataract Refract
Surg 2006; 32:324333