Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
No. 08-5179
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(7:08-cr-00216-HFF-3)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Cameron
1035-month
ONeil
sentence
Anderson
imposed
appeals
following
his
jury
conviction
trial
on
and
four
and
7),
and
four
counts
of
possession
of
firearm
in
in
violation
of
18
U.S.C.
2,
924(c)(1)(A)
(2006)
n.11
(1970).
The
court
U.S.
257,
262
(1971).
We
may
reject
plea
in
must
determine
whether,
court
may
enter
judgment
on
plea
of
United
the
Government
proffered
facts
that
Anderson
to
provide
an
explanation.
In
light
of
Andersons
the
district
court
did
not
abuse
its
We find
discretion
in
also
argues
that
the
Government
presented
that
(2) that
rights
so
the
such
as
prosecutors
engaged
conduct
prejudiced
to
the
deny
in
the
defendant
improper
conduct,
defendants
a
fair
and
substantial
trial.
United
Because
review for plain error, affirming unless Anderson can show that
(1) an error was made, (2) it was plain, and (3) it affected
[his] substantial rights.
Id.
although
trial
testimony
differed
somewhat
from
the
affected
by
the
Governments
actions
during
the
plea
he
was
denied
fair
trial
by
any
improper
governmental action.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district
court.
legal
before
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED