Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 8

335

1.

without cost. If you are unable to pay the cost associated with an Appeal these costs may be

2.

provided to you without cost. All right. Now, with that being said the Court is going to move

3.

directly to Sentencing. Mr. Spellacy, any objection?

4.
5.
6.
7.

MR. SPELLACY: No objection Your Honor.


THE COURT: Mr. Gold?
MR. GOLD: No objection Your Honor.
THE COURT: Okay. Every day we

8.

hear about Police Officers that are being shot at and killed and spit at and things thrown at

9.

them and names being called. This happens every day, we hear it every day and every day

10.

that these same very Police Officers that we are spitting at and calling names at and throwing

11.

things at and shooting at and killing, are the very same Police Officers that we're calling to

12.

say, please help us. Help me because somebody ran into my car, help me because somebody

13.

broke into my house, help me because my son is about to kill himself. The very Police

14.

Officers that we have mother fucked and called pigs and spit at and thrown things at are the

15.

same individuals that we call and what is so remarkable about this is, they come, they come,

16.

they come to the same people that call them names and tell them how much they hate them,

17.

we hate you, we despise you, but yet come when we call and these officers come. On a

18.

personal note my child said to me one day, mom, I want to be a police officer and my first

19.

response is, please don't and I had to take a step back because it's not that I don't appreciate

20.

the profession, but I don't want my child to be spit at and things thrown at and shot at and

21.

killed, I don't want that for my child so I have to beg my son, don't be a Police Officer. No

22.

matter what we do, no matter what we say to these men and women, when we call them, they

23.

come. I have to say, I have to say this, you people are far better than I could ever be. When

24.

is it going to stop? You know when are we going to stop doing this? When are we going to

25.

stop saying, we hate you, we hate you, we hate you but help us. When are we going to

336

1.

appreciate what these men and women do? They don't make the law. If you don't like the

2.

law, go to the people that make it. You don't like the speeding rules, go to the people that

3.

make the rules. They' re just the bearer of bad news, they have to follow the rules and what's

4.

so troubling about this case is as we sat and watched, they weren't doing anything wrong.

5.

They were called to help. That' s all they were doing. It's just so sad. When is this going to

6.

stop. I don't know when it's going to stop. I have no control over when it's going to stop but

7.

I'll tell you what, I have a little bit of control, I could maybe stop it for a little bit of time,

8.

just a little bit of time. On count one, obstructing official business.

9.

MR. SPELLACY: Judge can we approach?

10.
11.

THE COURT: Yes. That's fine, thank you.


Does your client have anything he'd like to say? And/or you and I apologize for not giving
him that opportunity, he certainly has the right to respond.

12.
13.

MR. TRASK.A: Your Honor Mr. Odolecki has a few words he ' d like to say to
the Court.

14.

THE COURT: His right, please.

15.

MR. TRASK.A: Thank you.

16.

MR. ODOLECKI: Your Honor I'd just like to say that these days the conversation

17.

of police brutality and abuse is on the forefront of everyone's mind. It's not something that

18.

is not happening just because we're you know trying to mask it and I just, I just feel that I

19.

don't want to have to be shot to prove that point okay by a Police Officer. You may call the

20.

police, I would never call the police, never. I can take care of my own things, I don't need

21.

them. I don't want their service, I don't want to have to pay for it, but I'm forced to . There

22.

is a problem here in the Parma Police Department. There's a problem in Police Departments

23.

across the Country and that's the fact that the thin blue line protects them, they protect each

24.

other from things that are, that each other do and they try to make sure that they don't

337

1.

get in trouble for those things and alls I'm trying to do by filming them is make sure that

2.

if that happens that they can' t just come in here and say, you know, I'm a decorated officer,

3.

I've done all this service and everything like that so you have to excuse the fact that I just

4.

assaulted someone on video, you know, I want to make sure that they, that there is at least

5.

the evidence there that it happened so --

6.

THE COURT: Mr. Odolecki, I have to

7.

interrupt. But what about you sir? What about you? You come close to assaulting, you're

8.

almost like a bully, you're almost like a bully, you know they can't respond, you know, you

9.

know they can't -- you know I wonder what would happen if it were just you and average

10.

Joe out on the street and you' re doing this to average Joe, I wonder what that response would

11 .

be and I have to interrupt you again to say, we watched this video, those individuals, those

12.

Police Officers were doing nothing wrong, nothing wrong and but for the grace of God, but

13.

for the grace of God, that young man didn' t jump. How would you have felt, and you don't

14.

have to answer, how would you have felt, if he jumped? And as an aside, if I were just the

15.

regular average Joe, and ifl were the mother and that particular scenario, sir, I guarantee

16.

you, you would have to call the police to get me off of you. So I hear what you're saying and

17.

you do have certain Constitutional Rights that we all have, but sir, that's a power that we

18.

have our voice is a power but with great power comes great responsibility.

19.

MR. ODOLECKI: I'm well aware of that Your Honor.

20.
21.

THE COURT: And I don't think you are.


MR. ODOLECKI: I -- just to respond to that last bit that you said.

22.
23.

THE COURT: Yes.


MR. ODOLECKI: The only thing that I have to say about that is I approached the

24.

scene of this and didn' t say a word. It wasn't until I was taunted by them, well I'm not even

25.

go to use the word taunted.

338

THE COURT: You know what, you can

1.

2.
3.

say whatever you want to me.


MR. ODOLECKI: I was, I was, they interacted with me first. Alls I was doing

4.

is filming. If they hadn't have done what they had done, that video would have come out and

5.

I would have created a story that said, hero cop saves kid from suicide. But that' s not what

6.

happened. Instead I was lied to, assaulted, had to try to have my camera blocked, which to

7.

me is a violation of my rights. So, I mean, I'm sorry for whatever the pain caused or whatever

8.

but I just can't, I can't just stand idly by while this is happening, because as Mr. Spellacy

9.

said to the jury many times, this is your community, well guess what, it's my community too

10.

and I'm sorry if you feel a certain way about that, but it is my community as well.

11.
12.

THE COURT: Thank you Mr. Odolecki.


MR. ODOLECKI: Sure.

13.
14.
15.

THE COURT: Mr. -- did you have more?


MR. ODOLECKI: No.
THE COURT: Mr. Gold?

16.

MR. GOLD : I'd like the Court in considering its Sentence to consider that you

17.

know I think that these the factual circumstances presented here really it raise some issues

18.

of first impression. These -- this was a -- the scene, first, you know we start with the

19.

checkpoint, the law is not super clear on that, there' s no other case out there that went so

20.

far as to affirm any kind of conviction for the kind of conduct that we're talking about here.

21.

This was a rather novel issue and I think that you could probably take many different

22.

lawyers and many different Judges, much less many different jurors and arrive at different

23.

opinions and conclusions about what may or may not, what was or was not protected speech

24.

in that situation and there would be genuine disagreements based on what we understand

25.

the law to be. The situation with the, the, the Snow Road bridge incident, it raises, I mean

339

1.

it's, on one hand, you know, I mean there's general kind of idea of you know do we have

2.

a right to film, well generally, I think that it's Mr. Odolecki' s genuine belief at least that

3.

he does and maybe you know this is one of those cases where you've got this exception

4.

based on these circumstances that if it's an emergency by nature of it's very definition, it

5.

was unexpected. It was a different kind of situation, there was information that you know

6.

not known to Mr. Odolecki that may or may not have changed things but it was, one thing

7.

was clear is that he didn't have all the information and that doesn't necessarily maybe mean

8.

that the police didn't have a right to tell him to leave but from, you know, just when you're

9.

operating under this general understanding that, you know, we can film, and the lines not

10.

real clear maybe because it' s such a fact specific determination of what is or isn't an

11.

emergency and we saw I think even in some of the testimony that you know when the

12.

question is asked when does that emergency end, that was the answer we were given well

13.

you have to look at the facts and you know maybe when the scene is cleared but I think we

14.

can all agree that just because we see police with lights, that's not necessarily an

15.

emergency and in fact the Parma Police you know have been filmed by Mr. Odolecki before

16.

and there ' s never been any kind of suggestion that, that, you know, that those were

17.

emergencies that you know his filming was somehow acting in misconduct. So, I mean, you

18.

know it' s a lot of information I think to process at one time and when you're I think as

19.

driven as someone like Mr. Odolecki, feel as strongly as he does about what we' ll call police

20.

accountability, maybe you don't, you don't, it's tough to appreciate just what you're doing

21.

is not helping and you know, and with respect to the -- and I' ll lump that in with the

22.

obstructing official business at the bridge because I think that you know my, what I'm

23.

suggesting to the Court would ring true for that as well. And finally with respect to the

24.

disorderly conduct you know I think that, I don't think that Mr., you know, I don't want

25.

to speak for Mr. Odolecki but I don't think that we would agree that it's okay in all

340

1.

circumstances to throw "F" bombs around particularly in the presence of children but

2.

again you know it kind of brings me back to my, one of my questions in voir dire, you know

3.

if you had one of your children at a Steelers, Browns game and you saw that language you

4.

know would you expect that you know they would haul that person away. You know

5.

anyone who has been to a game has seen that that just doesn't happen you know and you

6.

know this situation is different also then maybe like a protest, counter protest situation. This

7.

was a little bit different but so I it's not to say that in all situations that kind oflanguage should

8.

be tolerated around children but I think that you know what is clear is that there was some

9.

kind of physical altercation that it appeared at least between Officer, Sergeant Gillissie and

10.

the Defendant. At a minimum you know there was contact with Sergeant Gillissie and the

11.

camera and not to say that it excuses the language that was used after the fact but I think

12.

you know our basic common experience can tell us that when something like that happens,

13.

you can lose your cool and so you know all I'm suggesting to the Court is that consider that

14.

Mr. Odolecki is human and that you know, you know he could be just as prone as any of

15.

us to losing our cool. So you know in conclusion I would like the Court to you know

16.

consider that you know due to some of the unique circumstances of these cases, as well as

17.

some of the, the context, which might not, at least in this situation, have been determinative

18.

as to guilt or innocence, I would at least like the Court to consider all of that as it delivers

19.

its Sentence to Mr. Odolecki today. Thank you.

20.

THE COURT: Thank you. All right. On

21.

count one, obstructing official business on 6/13/14, 90 days in jail, $200.00 fine, Court costs

22.

are imposed. On count two, misconduct at an emergency on 7/29/15, 180 days in jail, $200.00

23 .

fine, Court costs are imposed. On count three, obstructing official business on 7/29/15, 90

24.

days in jail, $200.00 fine . On count four, disorderly conduct of7/29/15, 30 days in jail,

25.

$100.00 fine. The Court has imposed a 390 day Sentence, your jail time will run consecutive,

341

1.

jail time starts today.

2.

MR. GOLD: Your Honor?

3.

THE COURT: Yes.

4.

MR. GOLD: I believe that count two the misconduct at the scene of an

5.

emergency was a fourth degree misdemeanor as I look at the Parma Municipal Ordinance.

6.

There was no finding of physical, risk of physical harm.

7.

THE COURT: The finding of physical

8.

harm went to the felony charge, if there were to be a felony, and there wasn't a felony filed

9.

on this.

10.

MR. GOLD: It' s a fourth degree misdemeanor Your Honor.

11.

MR. SPELLACY: I'll check the code book Your Honor.


THE COURT: Okay.

12.
13.

MR. SPELLACY: What' s the section Judge?


THE COURT: The section is 648 .07.

14.
15.

MR. SPELLACY: It is an M-4 Your Honor.


THE COURT: Okay. The Court will

16.
17.

correct itself. Misconduct at an emergency, Parma Codified Ordinance 648 .07 is a fourth

18.

degree misdemeanor. Sentence shall be 30 days in jail, $200. 00 fine, Court costs are

19.

imposed. Count three, obstructing, 90 days in jail, $200.00 fine, count four, disorderly

20.

conduct, 30 days in jail. Count one, obstructing, 90 days injail. Jail time will run

21.

consecutive. Jail time starts today.

22.
23.
24.
25.

MR. GOLD: Your Honor -THE COURT: Mr. Gold anything further?
MR. GOLD : May I make a Motion to Continue Bond Pending Appeal?
THE COURT: Your Motion is denied. Mr.

342

1.
2.
3.
4.

5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

10.

11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.

17.
18.
19.
20.

21.
22.
23.
24.
25.

Spellacy anything else?


MR. SPELLACY: Nothing further, thank you Your Honor.
THE COURT: Thank you very much.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi