Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
No. 12-1361
Submitted:
Decided:
August 3, 2012
PER CURIAM:
Ramandeep Singh Bindra, a native and citizen of India,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals
(Board)
judges
denial
dismissing
of
his
his
appeal
requests
for
from
the
asylum,
immigration
withholding
of
the
reasons
set
forth
below,
we
deny
the
petition
for
review.
A
determination
regarding
eligibility
for
asylum
or
Administrative findings of
novo,
affording
interpretation
of
appropriate
the
[Immigration
and
to
the
Nationality
the
Board
only
if
the
evidence
presented
was
so
483-84; see Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 325 n.14 (4th Cir. 2002).
Furthermore,
[t]he
agency
decision
2
that
an
alien
is
not
substantial
finding.
We
evidence
further
supports
conclude
that
the
adverse
Bindra
failed
credibility
to
present
(Because
of
the
burden
of
proof
for
withholding
removal
is
higher than for asylum even though the facts that must be
proved are the same an applicant who is ineligible for asylum
is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8
U.S.C.] 1231(b)(3).).
Additionally,
Bindra
challenges
the
denial
of
his
To
be
removal.
tortured
if
removed
to
the
proposed
country
of
495 F.3d 113, 124 (4th Cir. 2007) (setting forth standard of
review).
Accordingly,
dispense
with
oral
we
deny
argument
the
petition
because
the
for
facts
review.
and
We
legal
PETITION DENIED