Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
No. 10-5056
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:10-cr-00369-RBH-2)
Submitted:
Decided:
Kathy Price Elmore, ORR ELMORE & ERVIN, LLC, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellant.
Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant
United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM:
Ryshon Petoez Grate pled guilty, pursuant to a written
plea agreement, to bank robbery and use of a firearm during a
crime
of
violence,
18
U.S.C.
924(c)(1)(A),
2113(a),
(d)
affirm.
We conclude, based on our review of the transcript of
Grates
guilty
complied
with
plea
Rule
hearing,
11
in
that
accepting
the
district
Grates
court
guilty
fully
plea.
The
court ensured that Grate understood the charges against him and
the
potential
sentence
he
faced,
that
he
entered
his
plea
Accordingly, we affirm
We
review
sentence
abuse-of-discretion standard.
38, 51 (2007).
procedural
First,
this
properly
U.S.C.
and
substantive
court
3553(a)
presented
by
the
selected sentence.
F.3d
572,
576
substantive
totality
of
reasonableness
under
an
calculated
for
must
the
assess
whether
Guidelines
(2006)
and
the
range,
factors,
parties,
of
sentence.
district
considered
analyzed
any
sufficiently
Id.
court
the
18
arguments
explained
the
(4th
Cir.
2010).
reasonableness
the
reasonableness
of
We
the
circumstances
to
also
must
sentence,
see
consider
the
examin[ing]
the
whether
the
sentencing
United
this
case,
the
district
court
correctly
calculated
and
and
relevant
allocution
3553(a)
from
factors
Grate.
and
The
explained
court
that
considered
the
within-
of
eighty-four
months
imprisonment
is
substantively
reasonable.
This court
the
Supreme
Court
of
the
United
States
for
further
review.
move
in
representation.
this
and
materials
legal
before
for
leave
to
withdraw
from
court
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED