Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
No. 10-1805
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Paul W. Grimm, Magistrate District
Judge. (1:09-cv-01201-PWG)
Submitted:
Decided:
August 5, 2011
Thomas Vecchio,
for Appellants.
STOCKBRIDGE, PC,
STOCKBRIDGE, PC,
PER CURIAM:
Engineered
Framing
Systems,
Incorporated,
(collectively,
the
EFS
Parties),
appeal
the
breach
of
contract,
in
granting
declaratory
relief
to
We affirm.
to
the
EFS
639
Parties.
F.3d
111,
119
PBM
Prods.,
(4th
Cir.
LLC
v.
2011).
Mead
Summary
To
of
survive
contract,
summary
judgment
on
the
Parties
were
EFS
Fed. R. Civ. P.
Corsairs
required
claim
to
for
submit
the
terms
Corsairs
performance.
of
an
See
express
All
condition
State
Home
precedent
Mortg.,
Daniel, 977 A.2d 438, 447 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2009).
Inc.
to
v.
find
condition
that
precedent
because
summary
judgment
before
the
court
it,
see
EFS
to
Parties
Corsairs
determining
need
Fed.
only
R.
satisfied
performance.
whether
consider
Civ.
P.
the
to
grant
materials
56(c);
terms
of
the
Additionally,
a
in
Campbell
motion
the
v.
for
record
Hewitt,
Coleman & Assocs., Inc., 21 F.3d 52, 55 (4th Cir. 1994), the
magistrate judges grant of summary judgment to Corsair without
consideration of testimony the EFS Parties hoped to present at
trial was not error.
The EFS Parties also challenge the magistrate judges
grant of declaratory relief to Corsair, seemingly arguing that
the court should have declared that the grant of relief was
subject to limitations and restrictions.
the
appellant
relies.),
we
deem
it
abandoned.
See Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607
(4th Cir. 2009); Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241
n.6 (4th Cir. 1999).
Finally, the EFS Parties contend that the magistrate
judge
erred
in
granting
permanent
injunction
to
Corsair
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
contentions
the
court
are
and
AFFIRMED