KUESIONER PENELITIAN

DETERMINAN KINERJA KADER POSYANDU DALAM MENUJU REVITALISASI

POSYANDU DI KECAMATAN PANTAI LABU KABUPATEN DELI SERDANG
TAHUN 2009
No responden

:.......................

I. KARAKTERISTIK INDIVIDU KADER POSYANDU

1)

Umur Responden

2)

Pendidikan Terakhir

: ................ Tahun (Sebutkan)

a. Tamat SD
b. Tamat SLTP
c. Tamat SLTA
d. Tamat D-3/S-1
3)

Pekerjaan Kader
a. Ibu Rumah Tangga
b. PNS
c. Wiraswasta

II. MOTIVASI KADER (INSENTIF/JASA dan TANGGUNG JAWAB)

No
01

Jawaban
TP CP SP

Pernyataan
A. Insentif (Jasa)
Insentif diterima setiap 3-6 bulan sekali

02

Insentif hanya dalam bentuk transportasi saja

03

Insentif/jasa yang diterima disesuaikan dengan tingkat pendidikan

04

Insentif yang diterima disesuaikan dengan beban kerja

05

Mendapatkan dana yang bersumber dari dana JAMKESMAS

06

Mendapatkan tambahan insentif dari iuran masyarakat

07

Kader menerima JPKMS

Keterangan: TP : Tidak Puas; CP=Cukup Puas dan SP= Sangat Puas.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Tabel Pertanyaan motivasi lanjutan

No

Jawaban
S
K
TP

Pernyataan

B. Tanggung Jawab
01 Mempersiapkan peralatan terlebih dahulu sebelum hari buka
posyandu
02 Memperhatikan kenyamanan dan kebersihan ruangan posyandu
03
04

Mencatat dan mendengarkan setiap informasi dan keluhan

masyarakat dalam kegiatan posyandu
Membantu dan melaksanakan tugas sebagai kader posyandu

05

Menyediakan waktu setiap ada jadwal posyandu

06

Menjalankan tugas secara sukarela dan ikhlas

Keterangan : S=Sering; K=Kadang-kadang, dan TP=Tidak Pernah

VARIABEL KINERJA
Sebelum hari
HPosyandu
Apakah Ibu
melaksanakan
beberapa kegiatan?

Sebelum hari
HPosyandu
Apakah ibu?

(1)
1. Menyiapkan tempat pelaksanaan, peralatan, 1. Ya
sarana dan prasarana, PMT sebelum posyandu 2. Tidak (2)
dimulai.
2. Memberitahukan warga adanya kegiatan di 1. Ya
(1)
posyandu?
2. Tidak (2)
3. Mendata jumlah sasaran Ibu hamil, WUS,
PUS, Ibu menyusui, Ibu balita, dan sasaran
UPGK yang ada diwilayah posyandu binaan
Ibu?
4. Melaksanakan
pendaftaran
pengunjung
Posyandu balita dan ibu hamil.

1. Ya
(1)
2. Tidak (2)
1. Ya
(1)
2. Tidak (2)

(1)
5. Melakukan penimbangan balita dan Ibu hamil 1. Ya
2. Tidak (2)
yang berkunjung ke posyandu?
6. Melakukan penimbangan balita dan Ibu hamil 1. Ya
(1)
yang berkunjung ke posyandu?
2. Tidak (2)
7. melakukan kegiatan penyuluhan kesehatan dan 1. Ya
(1)
gizi serta pemberian PMT bila menemukan 2. Tidak (2)
balita Bbnya BGM ?
8. Membantu memberikan pelayanan kesehatan : 1. Ya
(1)
KB, imunisasi, Fe, Oralit dan obat-obatan 2. Tidak (2)
lainnya bersama petugas kesehatan di Posyandu
kepada pengunjung Posyandu

Universitas Sumatera Utara

(1)
9. Mencatat di secarik kertas yang diselipkan 1. Ya
kedalam KMS/ buku KIA setelah menimbang 2. Tidak (2)
balita dan Ibu hamil kemudian baru mencatat
hasilnya di KMS/ buku KIA dan mengisi buku
register ?
(1)
10. Memberikan PMT dan penyuluhan kesehatan 1. Ya
2. Tidak (2)
bila menemukan balita KEP?
(1)
11. Melakukan
konsultasi
kepada
petugas 1. Ya
kesehatan bila menemukan balita sudah 3 (tiga) 2. Tidak (2)
kali berturut-turut BBnya tidak naik ?
Setelah hari
HPosyandu
Apakah ibu?

12. Merapikan tempat posyandu,

pencatatan dan evaluasi kegiatan

(1)
melengkapi 1. Ya
2. Tidak (2)

(1)
13. Membuat grafik SKDN jumlah semua balita 1. Ya
yang ada di wilayah binaan posyandu. S : 2. Tidak (2)
Jumlah balita yang mempunyai KMS/ buku
KIA.
(1)
14. Melakukan tindak lanjut dan kunjungan rumah 1. Ya
kepada sasaran yang tidak datang ke posyandu? 2. Tidak (2)
(1)
15. Melakukan tatap muka ke tokoh masyarakat 1. Ya
setempat dan menghadiri pertemuan rutin 2. Tidak (2)
organisasi keagamaan dalam masyarakat seperti
pengajian, wirit, arisan dan lain-lain.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 2
HASIL PENGOLAHAN DATA PENELITIAN
VALIDITAS DAN REABILITAS
VARIABEL INSENTIF

Reliability
****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ******
_
R E L I A B I L I T Y

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

A N A L Y S I S

INSENT1
INSENT2
INSENT3
INSENT4
INSENT5
INSENT6
INSENT7

Statistics for
SCALE

Mean
16.9000

S C A L E

(A L P H A)

Mean

Std Dev

Cases

2.5000
2.7000
2.5000
2.2000
2.4000
2.3000
2.3000

.7071
.4830
.7071
.6325
.6992
.6749
.6749

10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
N of
Variables
7

Variance
16.9889

Std Dev
4.1218

Scale
Mean
if Item
Deleted

Scale
Variance
if Item
Deleted

Corrected
ItemTotal
Correlation

14.4000
14.2000
14.4000
14.7000
14.5000
14.6000
14.6000

11.8222
13.9556
11.8222
12.9000
12.0556
12.4889
12.9333

Item-total Statistics

INSENT1
INSENT2
INSENT3
INSENT4
INSENT5
INSENT6
INSENT7

Alpha
if Item
Deleted

.9597
.7758
.9597
.8120
.9154
.8478
.7416

.9429
.9592
.9429
.9550
.9467
.9523
.9608

Reliability Coefficients
N of Cases =
Alpha =

10.0

N of Items =

.9584

Universitas Sumatera Utara

VARIABEL TANGGUNG JAWAB

Reliability
****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ******
_

R E L I A B I L I T Y
A)

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

TGGJWB1
TGGJWB2
TGGJWB3
TGGJWB4
TGGJWB5
TGGJWB6

Statistics for
SCALE

Mean
14.1000

A N A L Y S I S

S C A L E

(A L P H

Mean

Std Dev

Cases

2.3000
2.4000
2.2000
2.4000
2.3000
2.5000

.6749
.6992
.6325
.6992
.6749
.7071

10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
N of
Variables
6

Variance
12.9889

Std Dev
3.6040

Scale
Mean
if Item
Deleted

Scale
Variance
if Item
Deleted

Corrected
ItemTotal
Correlation

11.8000
11.7000
11.9000
11.7000
11.8000
11.6000

9.2889
8.9000
9.8778
8.9000
9.2889
8.4889

Item-total Statistics

TGGJWB1
TGGJWB2
TGGJWB3
TGGJWB4
TGGJWB5
TGGJWB6

Alpha
if Item
Deleted

.7886
.8629
.6820
.8629
.7886
.9708

.9360
.9270
.9477
.9270
.9360
.9130

Reliability Coefficients
N of Cases =
Alpha =

10.0

N of Items =

.9423

VARIABEL KINERJA KADER POSYANDU

Reliability
****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ******

Universitas Sumatera Utara

R E L I A B I L I T Y

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.

A N A L Y S I S

KINERJA1
KINERJA2
KINERJA3
KINERJA4
KINERJA5
KINERJA6
KINERJA7
KINERJA8
KINERJA9
KINERJ10
KINERJ11
KINERJ12
KINERJ13
KINERJ14
KINERJ15

Statistics for
Mean
SCALE
25.7000
Item-total Statistics
Scale
Mean
if Item
Deleted
KINERJA1
KINERJA2
KINERJA3
KINERJA4
KINERJA5
KINERJA6
KINERJA7
KINERJA8
KINERJA9
KINERJ10
KINERJ11
KINERJ12
KINERJ13
KINERJ14
KINERJ15

23.9000
24.0000
24.1000
23.9000
24.0000
23.9000
24.1000
23.9000
24.1000
23.9000
23.9000
24.1000
24.0000
24.0000
24.0000

R E L I A B I L I T Y

S C A L E

Std Dev

Cases

1.8000
1.7000
1.6000
1.8000
1.7000
1.8000
1.6000
1.8000
1.6000
1.8000
1.8000
1.6000
1.7000
1.7000
1.7000

.4216
.4830
.5164
.4216
.4830
.4216
.5164
.4216
.5164
.4216
.4216
.5164
.4830
.4830
.4830

10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
N of
Variables
15

Variance
34.2333

Std Dev
5.8509

Scale
Variance
if Item
Deleted

Corrected
ItemTotal
Correlation

29.6556
30.0000
30.1000
29.6556
29.5556
29.6556
30.1000
29.6556
30.5444
29.6556
29.6556
30.1000
30.0000
29.5556
30.4444
A N A L Y S I S

Reliability Coefficients
N of Cases =
10.0
Alpha =
.9681

(A L P H A)

Mean

Alpha
if Item
Deleted

.9581
.7559
.6824
.9581
.8462
.9581
.6824
.9581
.6996
.9580
.7581
.6824
.7554
.8472
.6670
-

.9635
.9668
.9684
.9635
.9652
.9635
.9684
.9635
.9700
.9635
.9635
.9684
.9668
.9652
.9684

S C A L E

(A L P H A)

N of Items = 15

Frequencies

Universitas Sumatera Utara

UMUR

Valid

20-30 Tahun
31-40 Tahun
Total

Frequency
18
36
54

Percent
33.3
66.7
100.0

Valid Percent
33.3
66.7
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
33.3
100.0

DIDIKAN

Valid

Tamat SD
Tamat SLTP
Tamat SLTA
Total

Frequency
18
17
19
54

Percent
33.3
31.5
35.2
100.0

Valid Percent
33.3
31.5
35.2
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
33.3
64.8
100.0

DIDIK

Valid

Sedang
Rendah
Total

Frequency
36
18
54

Percent
66.7
33.3
100.0

Valid Percent
66.7
33.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
66.7
100.0

JN_KERJA

Valid

IRT
Wiraswasta/Pegawai
Swasta
PNS
Petani/Buruh
Total

Frequency
32

Percent
59.3

Valid Percent
59.3

Cumulative
Percent
59.3

14.8

14.8

74.1

5
9
54

9.3
16.7
100.0

9.3
16.7
100.0

83.3
100.0

KERJA

Valid

Bekerja
Tidak Bekerja
Total

Frequency
24
30
54

Percent
44.4
55.6
100.0

Valid Percent
44.4
55.6
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
44.4
100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara

INSENTIF

Valid

Baik
Sedang
Kurang
Total

Frequency
8
19
27
54

Percent
14.8
35.2
50.0
100.0

Valid Percent
14.8
35.2
50.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
14.8
50.0
100.0

TGG_JWB

Valid

Rendah
Sedang
Tinggi
Total

Frequency
10
19
25
54

Percent
18.5
35.2
46.3
100.0

Valid Percent
18.5
35.2
46.3
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
18.5
53.7
100.0

Motivasi Kader Posyandu

Valid

Tinggi
Sedang
Rendah
Total

Frequency
8
17
29
54

Percent
14.8
31.5
53.7
100.0

Valid Percent
14.8
31.5
53.7
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
14.8
46.3
100.0

Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Valid

Baik
Sedang
Kurang
Total

Frequency
15
10
29
54

Percent
27.8
18.5
53.7
100.0

Valid Percent
27.8
18.5
53.7
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
27.8
46.3
100.0

Crosstabs
UMUR * Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Crosstab

UMUR

20-30 Tahun

31-40 Tahun

Total

Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Baik
Sedang
Kurang
7
1
10
5.0
3.3
9.7
38.9%
5.6%
55.6%

Count
Expected Count
% within UMUR
% within Kinerja
Kader Posyandu
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within UMUR
% within Kinerja
Kader Posyandu
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within UMUR
% within Kinerja
Kader Posyandu
% of Total

Total
18
18.0
100.0%

46.7%

10.0%

34.5%

33.3%

13.0%
8
10.0
22.2%

1.9%
9
6.7
25.0%

18.5%
19
19.3
52.8%

33.3%
36
36.0
100.0%

53.3%

90.0%

65.5%

66.7%

14.8%
15
15.0
27.8%

16.7%
10
10.0
18.5%

35.2%
29
29.0
53.7%

66.7%
54
54.0
100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

27.8%

18.5%

53.7%

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
3.667a
4.151
.304

2
2

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.160
.125

.581

df

54

a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The

minimum expected count is 3.33.

DIDIK * Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Crosstab

DIDIK

Sedang

Rendah

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within DIDIK
% within Kinerja
Kader Posyandu
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within DIDIK
% within Kinerja
Kader Posyandu
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within DIDIK
% within Kinerja
Kader Posyandu
% of Total

Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Baik
Sedang
Kurang
15
6
15
10.0
6.7
19.3
41.7%
16.7%
41.7%

Total
36
36.0
100.0%

100.0%

60.0%

51.7%

66.7%

27.8%
0
5.0
.0%

11.1%
4
3.3
22.2%

27.8%
14
9.7
77.8%

66.7%
18
18.0
100.0%

.0%

40.0%

48.3%

33.3%

.0%
15
15.0
27.8%

7.4%
10
10.0
18.5%

25.9%
29
29.0
53.7%

33.3%
54
54.0
100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

27.8%

18.5%

53.7%

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
10.614a
15.115
9.530

2
2

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.005
.001

.002

df

54

a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The

minimum expected count is 3.33.

KERJA * Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Crosstab

KERJA

Bekerja

Tidak Bekerja

Total

Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Baik
Sedang
Kurang
10
3
11
6.7
4.4
12.9
41.7%
12.5%
45.8%

Count
Expected Count
% within KERJA
% within Kinerja
Kader Posyandu
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within KERJA
% within Kinerja
Kader Posyandu
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within KERJA
% within Kinerja
Kader Posyandu
% of Total

Total
24
24.0
100.0%

66.7%

30.0%

37.9%

44.4%

18.5%
5
8.3
16.7%

5.6%
7
5.6
23.3%

20.4%
18
16.1
60.0%

44.4%
30
30.0
100.0%

33.3%

70.0%

62.1%

55.6%

9.3%
15
15.0
27.8%

13.0%
10
10.0
18.5%

33.3%
29
29.0
53.7%

55.6%
54
54.0
100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

27.8%

18.5%

53.7%

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
4.343a
4.383
2.685

2
2

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.114
.112

.101

df

54

a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The

minimum expected count is 4.44.

Motivasi Kader Posyandu * Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Crosstab

Baik
Motivasi Kader
Posyandu

Tinggi

Sedang

Rendah

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Motivasi
Kader Posyandu
% within Kinerja
Kader Posyandu
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Motivasi
Kader Posyandu
% within Kinerja
Kader Posyandu
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Motivasi
Kader Posyandu
% within Kinerja
Kader Posyandu
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Motivasi
Kader Posyandu
% within Kinerja
Kader Posyandu
% of Total

Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Sedang
Kurang
5
2
1
2.2
1.5
4.3

Total
8
8.0

62.5%

25.0%

12.5%

100.0%

33.3%

20.0%

3.4%

14.8%

9.3%
7
4.7

3.7%
2
3.1

1.9%
8
9.1

14.8%
17
17.0

41.2%

11.8%

47.1%

100.0%

46.7%

20.0%

27.6%

31.5%

13.0%
3
8.1

3.7%
6
5.4

14.8%
20
15.6

31.5%
29
29.0

10.3%

20.7%

69.0%

100.0%

20.0%

60.0%

69.0%

53.7%

5.6%
15
15.0

11.1%
10
10.0

37.0%
29
29.0

53.7%
54
54.0

27.8%

18.5%

53.7%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

27.8%

18.5%

53.7%

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Value
12.344a
13.386
11.018

4
4

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.015
.010

.001

df

54

a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The

minimum expected count is 1.48.

Regression

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Variables Entered/Removedb
Model
1

Variables
Entered
Motivasi
Kader
Posyandu,
KERJA,
UMUR,
a
DIDIK

Variables
Removed

Method

Enter

a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Kader Posyandu
Model Summary
Model
1

R
.578a

R Square
.334

Adjusted
R Square
.279

Std. Error of
the Estimate
.741

a. Predictors: (Constant), Motivasi Kader Posyandu,

KERJA, UMUR, DIDIK

ANOVAb
Model
1

Regression
Residual
Total

Sum of
Squares
13.470
26.901
40.370

df
4
49
53

Mean Square
3.367
.549

F
6.134

Sig.
.000a

a. Predictors: (Constant), Motivasi Kader Posyandu, KERJA, UMUR, DIDIK

b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Kader Posyandu
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Model
1

B
-.534

Std. Error
.647

UMUR

.085

.222

DIDIK

.495

.255

KERJA

.211

Motivasi Kader Posyandu

.489

(Constant)

Standardized
Coefficients
Beta

t
-.825

Sig.
.413

.046

.383

.703

.270

1.941

.009

.239

.121

.882

.382

.146

.413

3.355

.002

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Kader Posyandu

Universitas Sumatera Utara