9/7/2014

Protection Of Copyright In The Digital Age The Role And Liabilities Of ISPs In India

Law Articles - India's Most Authentice Free legal Source Online

Hom e

To p R a te d

Su b m i t Arti cl e

Ad va n ce d Se a rch

FAQ

Co n ta ct U s

L a w ye rs i n In d i a

R SS Fe e d s

L a w Fo ru m

R e g is te r y o ur Co p y rig ht Online
W e offer c opyright registration right from your desk top c lic k here for details.

Latest Artic les | Artic les 2013 | Artic les 2012 | Artic les 2011 | Artic les 2010 | Artic les 2009 | Artic les 2008 | Artic les 2007 | Artic les 2006 | Artic les 2000-05
Search On:

Laws in India
Searc h

Main Categories

E-mail login

Mutual Consent Div orc e in Delhi

We provide fast, cost effective and Hassle free solution.
Contact us at Ph no: 9650499965 (Divorce Law Firm Delhi)

Enter KEYWORD here to find articles...

Search

Password

Login

Welcome!

Advanced Search

Banking and Finance laws

Case Laws
Civil Laws
Company Law

Please login or register a new

free account.

P ro te c tio n Of Co p y rig ht In T he D ig ita l A g e T he R o le A nd Lia b ilitie s Of IS P s In Ind ia ( Save as .pdf )

Published : February 08, 2014 | Author : kabirsagar49
Category : Intellectual Property | T otal Views : 993 | Rating :

Print |

Email to friend

Constitutional Law
Consumer laws
Contracts laws
Criminal law
Dubai laws
Environmental Law

Protection of Copyright In T he Digital Age: T he Role And Liabilities of ISPs

In India

k abirsagar49
Law Student

Infringement of Copyright is not a new concept. However, in the current digital age,
online protection of copyrights has become the foremost aspect of copyright protection.
View articles | Contact author
This essay shall deal with online copyright infringement and the corresponding liability
with respect to Internet Service Providers (ISPs), the fundamental character in online copyright infringement.

Immigration laws
Insurance / Accident Claim
Intellectual Property
International Law
Juvenile Laws
Law - lawyers & legal
Profession
Legal outsourcing
Media laws
Medico legal
Miscellaneous
Real estate laws
Tax Laws

The SEZs. are

given several
relaxations of
customs and other
duties including anti
dumping duty[3].
These are more liberal regimes in respect of
other levies, foreign investments and other
transactions...
full story | send to friend

family law
Human Rights laws

Random Pick

In recent years, European and American courts have witnessed several cases where Internet Service Providers (ISPs)
and such internet carriers have been sued for a variety of issues relating to copyright, invasion of privacy, defamation,
etc. In such cases, difficulties usually arise from the fact that intellectual property rights are traditionally bound by
territorial limitations which further become vague and complex when it
comes to the internet, resulting in confusion and conflict of law. The law
on the liability of Internet Service Providers (ISPs) is yet to be applied in
the Indian context. The Copyright Act, 1957 specifically excludes the
recognition of copyright and other similar rights apart from those
recognized under the Act. There is thus no common law copyright in
India and no place for applying tort law principles to find ISPs liable, as
has been the position in the United States.
ISP Liability In India:
In India, the approach of the law with respect to ISP liability is vertical.
This means that the liability of an alleged infringer would depend on the
area of law applicable for the particular type of infringement. This
approach has led to the establishment of liability of ISPs under the
Copyright Act and the Information Technology Act, which are discussed
below:

Statistics
Total Articles

936

Total Authors

2453
5587446

Total Views
Total categories

29

Law Forum

Torts Law

http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/article/protection-of-copyright-in-the-digital-age-the-role-and-liabilities-of-isps-in-india-1638-1.html

1/7

9/7/2014

Protection Of Copyright In The Digital Age The Role And Liabilities Of ISPs In India

1. Indian Copyright Act, 1957:

The Indian Copyright Act, 1957 was modelled after the British Copyright
Act of 1955. The Indian legal position in this regard reflects the British
position in the CBS Songs Case, which disallows the application of the
tort law principles of contributory and/or vicarious liability, but allows a
copyright infringement claim with respect to a breach of authorization
rights.

Woman Issues
Workplace Equality & NonDiscrimination
Yet Another Category

More Options
Most read articles

The Indian Copyright Act was drafted at time when the significance of the
internet as it is today was obviously not anticipated. It evidently has no
mention of the liabilities for ISPs in Copyright Infringement cases as such.
Though the Act has been amended in 1994 and 1999, it still does not
contain any express provision for determining or limiting ISP liability. Even
so, the careful choice of language has allowed it to be technologically
neutral, as well as open to interpretation. This shall be clear from the
following provisions, which could be interpreted to have bearing on the

Most rated articles

Subscription
Subsc ribe now and rec eiv e free
artic les and updates instantly.
Name

liability of ISPs to a certain extent,

Email

Re: cheque bounce case

Sir, I filed 138 case against cheque bounce
of Rs. 6.0 lacs against a cheat promoter
about one and half years back at Alipore
Police Court thru' ma...
Sep 6, 2014 6:21:28 AM
Ancestral property In Haryana
Hello All, My father's are five brothers and
all are settled in West Bengal. We belong
from a place called Siwani in Haryana. We
have an ancestral ...
Sep 6, 2014 1:33:08 PM
Issuing Blank Cheques as a Security to
private un li...
my friends father is doing a business and

As per Section 51(a)(ii) of the Copyright Act;

Remove

Subscribe

Copyright Registration
T o Copyright Your Book s, Videos,
Songs, Sc ripts etc
Call us at: 9891244487 / or email at:
admin@legalserviceindia.com
T op Law Colleges

La w U p d a te s :
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#

Free legal Advice - lawyers Forum

Inc ome-T ax
Family law
Company Law
Constitutional Law
Partnership firms
Immigration Law
Cyber Law
Lok Adalat, legal Aid & PIL
Forms
T rademark s
W oman issues
Medic o Legal
Consumer laws
Criminal laws
Supreme Court Judgments

Copyright in a work shall be deemed to be infringed, when any person, without a licence granted by the owner of the
Copyright or the Registrar of Copyrights under this Act or in contravention of the conditions of a licence so granted or
of any condition imposed by a competent authority under this Act permits for profit any place to be used for the
communication of the work to the public where such communication constitutes an infringement of the copyright in the
work, unless he was not aware and had no reasonable ground for believing that such communication to the public
would be an infringement of copyright.
Now ISPs allow their servers and other telecommunication devices to store and transmit their users data across the
network. These servers and devices however are physically present in the business premises of the Service Provider.
Hence they would come under the expression any place as mentioned in the Act and be held liable for storing and
transmitting infringed third party data if the other requirements are fulfilled. Moreover the expression permits for profit
is also of much importance. Hence to be liable the ISP must be benefitting financially from the infringing activities. ISPs
earn from not only their service charges but also from advertising. Now if they offer some service for free, say illegal
copyrighted material, they still profit from it through the advertisements that are bundled along with it.
Hence if the ISPs do transmit and store infringed material, they could still be liable if they fulfil the above two
requirements. Moreover, if the mentioned requirements are fulfilled they may also be liable criminally under Section 63
of the Copyright Act, which states;
Any person who knowingly infringes or abets the infringement of,
(a) the copyright in a work, or
(b) any other right conferred by this Act,
shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.
Finally the expression, unless he was not aware and had no reasonable ground for believing that such communication
to the public would be an infringement of copyright. This expression is crucial in the sense that the liability is
constituted only if the ISPs have the knowledge of the infringing material stored or being transmitted through their
servers. Hence the only exception to this liability is for the ISPs to prove that they did not know that their activities were
causing harm to the copyright owner.
2. Information T echnology Act, 2000
In India the provisions relating to the ISPs are to an extent legislated in the IT Act, 2000 where an Internet Service
Provider is referred to as Network service provider. According to S. 79 (a) of the Act a Network Service Provider
means an Intermediary. An Intermediary again has been defined under Section 2(w) as any person who on behalf of

http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/article/protection-of-copyright-in-the-digital-age-the-role-and-liabilities-of-isps-in-india-1638-1.html

2/7

9/7/2014

Protection Of Copyright In The Digital Age The Role And Liabilities Of ISPs In India

another person receives, stores, or transmits that message or provides any service with respect to that message.
Further, Section 79 in Chapter XII of the Act, which deals with cases where Network Service Providers are not to be
liable states:
For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that no person providing any service as a network service provider
shall be liable under this Act, rules or regulations made thereunder for any third party information or data made
available by him if he proves that the offence or contravention was committed without his knowledge or that he had
exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence or contravention.
Section 79 thus absolves the liability of the ISP if it can prove that firstly, there was no knowledge of the alleged
infringement, and secondly, due diligence was taken to prevent such infringement. It can be well construed that the
intention of this piece of legislation in this section is aimed at providing immunity to ISPs. This immunity is absolute if
the ISP can prove any of the above, namely lack of knowledge and due diligence. If the ISP has notice of the fact that
the data passed through its servers or stored in them likely infringes the copyright of another, he is deemed to have
knowledge about it and is under obligation to employ appropriate measures to prevent the same. Further the
expression due diligence is also included in the section. The degree of diligence would be judged by reasonable
standards expected of a person who is aware of an illegal activity taking place or likely to take place. This has left the
concept of liability in India a very vague and limited.
Therefore, to put it in a nutshell, the major limitations of the Indian law when it comes to address the problem of online
copyright infringement are;
(a) The vague provisions of section 79 of the IT Act, which leave enough scope for authorities to harass ISPs in
matters where their liability comes into question.
(b) The expression due diligence is pivotal in deciding the liability of ISPs. Unfortunately the term has not been
defined in the entire Act. This creates confusion and ambiguity among the ISPs as to the exact interpretation of due
diligence.
(c) Neither the Copyright Act nor the IT Act classifies or defines an ISP. ISP liability, if included within the IT Act, is
erroneously same for one who acts as a mere communication carrier such as telephone network operators, and one
who is responsible for transfer of data via the internet. It is therefore imperative that the difference is made clear and
that these two entities (Network Providers & Internet Service Providers) are classified accordingly.
ISP Liability In T he USA And Europe:
In the USA and Europe, wherever lawsuits questioning the liability of the ISP have come up, the two common grounds
of defence have been the following:
(a) Firstly, ISPs claim that they are just passive carriers and they play the role of a mere messenger and not as of a
publisher. In the case Fonovisa v Cherry Auctions, the court had said that supplying the site and facilities for direct
infringement is materially contributing to the infringing conduct and must attract liability. However in the case Sony v
Universal Studios the court rejected the proposition and held that merely providing means to accomplish infringing
activity was not sufficient without constructive knowledge of the infringing activity.
(b) Secondly, it is impossible to ensure that all the data flowing through its servers does not infringe any persons
copyright. Given that the quantum of data passing through their systems is colossal, it is highly impracticable to expect
ISPs to be able to screen the content in entirety. Moreover even post screening, 100% accuracy cannot be achieved
so as to prevent every single instance of copyright infringement. In the case Religious Technology Service Centre v
Netcom, the court held that information providers only offer an opportunity to publish and are unable to exercise any
influence on, or what people say on the internet.
We thus see that the two basic defences argued by the ISPs are the fact that they are just passive carriers of data and
are in no way materially involved in the conduct of infringement and secondly that it is practically impossible to screen
all the data passing through their servers.
http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/article/protection-of-copyright-in-the-digital-age-the-role-and-liabilities-of-isps-in-india-1638-1.html

3/7

9/7/2014

Protection Of Copyright In The Digital Age The Role And Liabilities Of ISPs In India

In the United States the law regarding online copyright infringement is dealt with in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
(DCMA), in effect from 1998. Title II of the DCMA, cited as the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act
(OCILLA) lays down the limitations on the liabilities for online copyright infringement. Furthermore, section 512 of the
Act provides for limitation of liabilities online. Each of the limitations in the act restricts monetary damages while
restricting the availability of injunctive relief in various respects. The OCILLA creates a safe harbour for Internet
Service Providers, provided they adhere to certain guidelines set for them. They are protected from copyright liability if
they block allegedly infringing material on receipt of notification from the copyright holder. Further, OCILLA has
provisions for counter-notification, wherein they (Service Providers) are harboured from liability to their users upon
notice from such users claiming that the alleged material in question does not constitute infringement.
Another aspect to be taken into consideration is the concept of Digital Rights Management (DRM). DRM is a class of
access control technologies that are used by hardware manufacturers, publishers, copyright holders and individuals
with the intent to limit the use of digital content and devices after sale. These techniques allow intellectual property
rules to be embedded directly in the infrastructure of online content distribution. Current DRM technologies seek to
foreclose violations of intellectual property rights by restricting users interactions with online content.
In the European Union, the liability regarding Internet Service providers are laid down by the Directive on e-Commerce
of 2000. The Electronic Commerce Directive, adopted in 2000, sets up an Internal Market framework for electronic
commerce, which provides legal certainty for business and consumers alike. It establishes harmonised rules on issues
such as the transparency and information requirements for online service providers, commercial communications,
electronic contracts and limitations of liability of intermediary service providers. The Directive provides for both
absolute and qualified exemption from liability for service providers. Article 12 of Section 4 of the Directive lays down
the rules wherein if the role of the service provider is merely of a conduit, the exemption from liability is absolute,
hence absolving the service provider from any liability for the conducts of its users.
Both the United States and the European Union give certain protections to internet service providers as well as
content providers. As hitherto mentioned, no liability is imposed on them unless service providers are expressly
notified of the alleged infringement.
Conclusion:
The law relating to ISP liability is vague and undefined, and is facilitating an unjust shift in the liability of wrongful users
on ISPs, making them the scapegoat of inadequate legal framework. There is therefore an urgent necessity to
incorporate express provisions in the Indian Copyright Act or the Information Technology Act regarding ISPs. In order
to pave way for sound legislation with regard to ISP liability in India, it is essential to address some of the key issues
mentioned hereunder;
a) First and foremost, there is an urgent need to outline the definition of an Internet Service Provider. Unless the
identity and role of an ISP is clearly specified, the law will be incomplete with regards to any of the other aspects. The
term due diligence in the IT Act also needs to be defined clearly as the liability of ISPs largely depend on the factor of
due diligence being present or not.
b) It is suggested that the liability of the ISP should be based on the degree of involvement in the alleged infringement.
Classifications as prepared in the DCMA can be used as an effective tool so that the liability of ISPs may clearly be
identified. While effective measures must be ensured so that ISPs cannot absolve their liability by giving frivolous
excuses, care should be taken that ISPs are not held responsible where they act as mere conduit providers and are at
not at actual fault. In order to achieve this, it is essential that proper classification of the ISPs, based on their roles in
the network system is carried out.
c) Provisions must be incorporated to address the financial aspect of transaction between the ISP and a third party.
The relation between the service provider and the subscriber also needs to be dealt with. This would help in the
separation of rights and duties between the provider and subscriber and therefore contribute to resolve the problem of
misunderstanding with regard to the question of liability.
d) Finally, the Information Technology Act must make it mandatory for ISPs to terminate services of subscribers who
http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/article/protection-of-copyright-in-the-digital-age-the-role-and-liabilities-of-isps-in-india-1638-1.html

4/7

9/7/2014

Protection Of Copyright In The Digital Age The Role And Liabilities Of ISPs In India

repeatedly violate copyrights and engage in infringement of copyrights. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act makes it
compulsory for the ISPs to follow such policies in order for them to eligible for protection under safe harbour
protection.
The ISPs play an important role in the growth of the internet, and thus enable transactions and communications
between millions and millions of users. The absence of specific laws defining the liability of ISPs, result in the constant
risk of incurring liability for any or all of their transactions and inactions, hindering the growth of the internet. With a
view to better equip Indian laws dealing with ISP liability for copyright violation by third parties, the IT Act requires
attention to some very fine, yet important issues without which the ISPs and their role could become disastrous to the
internet.
**************
# Ameet Dutta, ISP Liability in India: Fact or Fiction? May 2007
# CBS Songs Limited and Ors. vs. Amstrad Consumer Electronic Plc and Dixons Limited: [(1988) RPC
567 (HL)]
# Indian Copyright Act, 1957 S.51 (a)(ii)
# Indian Copyright Act, 1957 S.63 (a) & (b)
# Sharma Vakul, Information Technology Law and Practice, 2nd edition (Universal Law Publishing Co Pvt. Ltd, New
Delhi), 2007 p.18-19 and 191-192.
# Osborne D, Copyright and Trademark Infringement on the Net - Looking to the Internet Service Provider First,
[http://www.iprights.com 25 Jan 2009].
# 847 F. Supp. 1492, 1494 (E.D. Cal. 1994)
# 464 U.S. 417(1984)
# Sieber U, Criminal Liability for the Transfer of Data in International Networks-New Challenges for the Internet,
Computer Law and Security Report, 13(1) (1997) 151; CompuServes Ex-Officials Porn Case Reversed, Associated
Press (15th February 2009)
# 512(j) of The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 1998.
# 512(g)(2) Exception B
# See e.g. Microsoft, MSDN, Windows Media 9 Series,
# Webpage of the European Union
# Shah A., The Information Technology Act, 2000: A Legal Framework for E-governance,
http://www.sudhirlaw.com/innermain.htm
# 512(i) Conditions for Eligibility Section 512(i) outlines the general requirements for a grant of immunity; Service
Providers must implement an account termination policy for repeat infringers, must inform their users of this policy, and
must accommodate standard copy protection systems.

1
Rate this artic le!

Poor

5
Excellent

Rate Now!

1 BHK Starting at 18 lacs

tatavaluehomes.com
Book a Home Online @ Just Rs.30,000 at Shubh Griha Ahmedabad.Know
More!

http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/article/protection-of-copyright-in-the-digital-age-the-role-and-liabilities-of-isps-in-india-1638-1.html

5/7

9/7/2014

Protection Of Copyright In The Digital Age The Role And Liabilities Of ISPs In India
Lawyers in India
KV Bhashyam Chari & Associates
KV Bhashyam Chari & Associates: is a multi dimensional service Law Firm. It was established in the year 2008. The founder of the
firm is its Managi...
Feb 14, 2014 1:38:12 PM
S Kundu & Associates
S Kundu & Associates: My name is Soumya Kundu, I am a professional Legal Advisor. My Law Firm namely S Kundu & Associates is
based in Kolkata . We ...
Jan 31, 2014 6:48:05 PM
TCJ Consulting
TCJ Consulting Pvt. Ltd. is a Legal consulting firm, specializing into: (a) Foreign Direct Investment, Regulatory Affairs, Incorporation of
Company...
Jan 12, 2014 6:30:38 PM
Curare Legal (Legal Cure)
Curare Legal (Legal Cure) is a full service law firm started with the concept of a single window legal advice and services to clients in

Most viewed articles in Intellectual Property category

Advertising
Bajaj Auto Limited
Copyright Societies
Section 25 of The Trade Marks Act, 1999
Trade Mark Law in India & Its Violation
Plagiarism
Patenting of Micro-Organisms in India: An Overview
Infringement of trademark and what constitutes honest practice in relation to trade and bussiness
Indian Copyright Software
Trade Secrets as an Intellectual Property Right Under Indian Law
Transborder reputation of Trade Marks.
Copyright Amendment Bill 2010
Originality Under Copyright Law-Is There Any Definite Standard?
Author's moral Right
Registration of Unconventional Trademarks
Comparative Advertisement & Infringement of Trademark

Most recent articles in Intellectual Property category

Intellectual Property Rights, Statutory Licensing In India
Patent of Addition
Bajaj Auto Ltd. Vs. T.V.S. Motor Company Ltd
Emerging paradigm of celebrity marks
Protection Of Copyright In The Digital Age The Role And Liabilities Of ISPs In India
Importance of IPR in Business World
Copyrighting a Documentary Film
Competition Law and Intellectual Property Rights: Confronting Paradigms
Universal Copyright Convention
Compulsory Licensing To Generic Drugs - A Lifeline To A Patient
Plant Variety Protection In India: An Alternative To Patents
Registration of shape of goods as Design
Copyright Amendment Bill, 2010
Trade Secrets & Competition Act
China and USA: Conflict arises in the IPR Protection in consideration with India
Passing off under trademark

http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/article/protection-of-copyright-in-the-digital-age-the-role-and-liabilities-of-isps-in-india-1638-1.html

6/7

9/7/2014

Protection Of Copyright In The Digital Age The Role And Liabilities Of ISPs In India

Article Comments
Posted by muhammed rafeeque on February 15, 2014
Clause 3 of "The Information Technology (Intermediaries guidelines) Rules, 2011" elaborates the "Due Diligence" process of Intermediaries

Post Your Comments

Name

Note : Your email address is only visible to admin, other members / users
cannot see it.

Email

You c an use following FXCodes

BOLD : [b]
Italic : [i]

Your comments

[b] Legal Services India [/ b] is a [i]nice website[/ i].

[url= http:/ / www.legalservicesindia.com/ article/ ]click here to visit.[/ url]
Legal Serv ic es India is a nice website.
Click here to visit

Post now
Note : Currently, user comments are moderated and will be posted only after approval.

Lawyers in India- Click on a link below for legal Services

lawyers in Delhi - New Delhi
lawyers in Chandigarh
lawyers in Noida
lawyers in Nashik

lawyers in Kolkata
lawyers in Rajkot
lawyers in Surat
lawyers in Indore

lawyers in Mumbai
lawyers in Thane
lawyers in Pune
lawyers in Nagpur

lawyers in Chennai
lawyers in Allahabad
lawyers in Ahmedabad
lawyers in Janjgir
lawyers in Ranchi
lawyers in Lucknow

lawyers in Bangalore
lawyers in Jodhpur
lawyers in Cochin
lawyers in Pondicherry
lawyers in Hyderabad
lawyers in Jaipur

For Mutual c onsent Div orc e

in Delhi
Click Here
Ph no: 9650499965

For online Copyright

Registration
c lic k here
Ph no: 9891244487

TOP
H o m e | Ab o u t U s | Pri va cy | Te rm s o f u se | F A Q | D i vo rce b y m u tu a l co n se n t | L a w ye rs | Su b m i t a rti cl e | S C Ju d g m e n ts | Co n ta ct U s

India's Most Trusted Online law library

Legal Services India is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) 2000-2014
ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3

http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/article/protection-of-copyright-in-the-digital-age-the-role-and-liabilities-of-isps-in-india-1638-1.html

7/7