Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Our Experience:
IIMT-Consulting helps you to achieve and sustain the success through strategic,
functional and process transformation that enables you to improve performance,
increase effectiveness, reduce costs and enhance resilience.
Clients retain us because we combine unparalleled expertise with innovative
thought leadership to address critical challenges, in both event-driven and longterm scenarios. FTI Consulting delivers an unmatched combination of breadth and
depth of expertise across our worldwide network of more than 4,400+ employees in
27 countries on six continents.
Our Testimonials:
IIMT Consulting was key to making Samsonites ERP software selection and
organizational change management initiatives successful. Their ERP expertise and
methodologies are unparalleled, Nick Macera, CIO, Samsonite Corporation
IIMT Consulting was key to making Samsonites ERP software selection and
organizational change management initiatives successful. Their ERP expertise
and methodologies are unparalleled, CEO of leading US bank
Problem Statement:
Poor IT governance and misalignment of CBLs strategy with its ICT department
Project Objective
Bank of Lesotho would move to the Turnaround Strategy and later shift
back to Support mode in the Strategic Grid
With the need for urgent new and sophisticated technology with low to
moderate reliability, Bank of Lesotho, on implementation, will move to the
Turnaround mode
OVERNANCE FRAMEWORK:
ICT GOVERNANCE RECOMMENDATION
Weill & Ross Governance Framework
Business Monarchy
In business monarchy, the IT department as a whole makes the decisions. Therefore
it is the corporate office that should make decisions for IT principles, process
business applications and manage IT prioritization and investment. The CEO of
Central bank of Lesotho works with a small team of top executives to ensure that IT
aligns with corporate objectives
IT Monarchy
In IT Monarchy, the decision rights rests with the individuals or group of IT
executives. The Architecture office should be responsible for taking rights in IT
infrastructure. The CIO IT leaders are responsible for IT Architecture.
Federal
It consists of C-level executives and business groups. Therefore the decision rights
for business applications should be handled by business leaders, business process
owners of CBL.
Duopoly
Duopoly consists of IT executives and one other group (e.g., CXO or business unit or
process leaders). Therefore the business leaders, IT leaders are responsible for the
input rights of IT principles, IT Infrastructure and IT prioritization and investment.
This IT governance framework strategic implementation are scheduled based on
priorities determined from the process gaps of existing IT governance to implement
an effective IT governance of Central bank of Lesotho. The respective departments
need to effectively implement the above IT services for effective governance
assessment.
Vigneshs Part
Strategic Alignment Model
Strategic alignment is an intense hands-on business redesign process, in which we
align your strategic goals, your business model and processes, and your company
culture with your key business purpose and core values.
The model involves the following five levels of Strategic Alignment Maturity
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Initial/Ad-hoc process
Committed process
Established Focus process
Improved/Managed process
Optimized process
Each of the five levels of alignment maturity focuses on set of six criteria. These six
criteria are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Communications Maturity
Competency/Value Measurement Maturity
Governance Maturity
Partnership Maturity
Scope and Architecture Maturity
Skills Maturity
CBL should get into LEVEL 2. In this level, CBL should focus on specific functions
or organizations. Gain some limited understanding between business and IT
functions of each others role. Relationships between IT and business should be
relaxed at some levels, with some opportunities to share knowledge and
information. The management style tends to be few continuous improvement
programs. Benchmarking is still informal. There are ments are technically
oriented and business metrics. Service level agreement cost oriented, but is still
not linked to and information. Technology standards and architecture have begun
to be defined at Enterprise level with some early attempts at cross- functional
integration.
Cost Components
The Cost Heads or the Cost Components involved in this project are listed below
and explained in detail.
Consulting Cost
As the scope of work has been defined clearly, the clients and consultants may
go ahead with the fixed pricing model, whereas if it were unclear, a T&M model
would have worked out best for both parties.
Training Cost
TRAINING COSTS Development costs (e.g., salaries and benefits of personnel, equipment).
Direct implementation costs (e.g., training materials, technology costs,
facilities, travel, equipment, instructors salary and benefits).
Indirect implementation costs (e.g., overhead, general and
administrative).
Compensation for participants.
Lost productivity or costs of backfilling positions during training.
INVESTMENTS
IT Investment Management portfolio alternatives consist of discretionary
(Optional), strategic and mandatory requirements and the mount of investment
% in each portfolio should be driven by business needs and will change from
year to year. Apart from this there will be a one-time initial cost and other
periodic costs such as Up-gradation cost, new product cost, Infrastructure cost
Extra man power costs.
Also, size can be used as a metric to measure the cost. The below mentioned
metrics can be used to determine the cost drivers:
Size of the organization: The size of an organization reflects its inertia, its
ability to resist change. The assumption is that the larger and more cumbersome
an organization, and in consequence the more inert it is, the more an
implementation effort will cost.
Size of the configuration: The size of the configuration effort is expressed in
terms of process maturity levels that are to be implemented. The assumption is
that effort will increase with the increase in maturity levels to be implemented.
Size of the implementation: Implementation effort is expressed by the number
of users involved, since these indicate training and reorganization effort.
AMC
This cost will be charged by the vendor. Software maintenance is most often
used to fund areas such as development, help line support, program fixes and
the like. General rule of thumb is 8-12% of the purchase price would be
considered a fair deal. We take a conservative estimate of 15% for the sake of
estimation.
Different companies follow different strategies on this. The following are the
common ones:
1. % cost on the purchase price of ERP ---- This means that if a company has
purchased an ERP package for 'x' amount then around 8-12 % of 'x' amount
will be charged as the AMC.
2. % cost on the list price of ERP --- This is nothing but the price is calculated
as a percentage (8-12%) on the list price.
3. Fixed amount --- They charge a fixed amount every year. This will be
increased every year based on certain criteria's.
The most important thing that we need to take into consideration the
deliverables in AMC (Like upgrade support, SLA, Technical support etc.)
METHODOLOGY
The need for a cost model is given by the fact that it is necessary to identify the
cost for each product or service in order to identify the profitability of IT
activities and processes. Traditionally, it is believed that a busy IT Department
(Information Technology Department) of an organization, with many services
offered for other departments is very profitable, or at least cost-effective. A
real and precise calculation of costs per product or service have unveiled that
the above is not necessarily true. In this project we suggest Activity-Based
Costing for costing model so that we can assign precise costs to our services.
Key elements of this method are activity and cost driver. Activity is defined as a
set of complementary tasks, which are done with a specific purpose. Cost driver
express the relation between an output (product or service) and the activities
consumed by it.
Cost objects represents batches, activities, processes, products, services,
customers and suppliers.
This method was developed because the traditional accounting system has a
weakness with the assignment of indirect costs. Indirect costs are the expenses
that dont directly generate profit, but are necessary for an organization (or
department) to continue activity. Traditional accounting method arbitrarily
allocates indirect costs to cost objects. Therefore, as the indirect costs increase,
the traditional method will yield a less accurate result for the true cost of a cost
object. 15
The ABC method solves this problem by transforming indirect costs to direct
ones. It traces, rather than allocates, each expense category to a cost object.
This method is applicable when indirect costs are greater than direct costs with
20 percent or more. Essentially, this method groups the costs in activity pools
instead of collecting them as indirect costs of a department. Similar processes
or activities, which are driven by a common factor, are grouped in the same
pool. Next step is to distribute collected costs to each product or service, by
using a cost driver .A cost driver is the common factor that groups activities or
processes in a specific pool. Examples of cost drivers include: number of setups,
number of tests, number of inspections, number of uptime hours for servers or
computers, number of failures, number of cycle times, cost of providing
resources, etc.. The total cost for each pool is distributed to products or services
using the volume of cost driver assigned to the pool. For example, if testing a
server requires 30 percent of the testing activity and the cost driver is the
number of tests, then the cost of the testing a server activity is 30 percent of
the testing costs.
Estimation of Costs
Estimated Costs
(in Maloti)
Total Cost =
88,549,440