Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

NONITO IMBO Y GAMORES

v.
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.
756 SCRA 196
April 20, 2015
Facts:
Imbo was charged in the following Information:
On or about the period comprised from October 14, 2003 up to January 25, 2004, in Quezon
City Philippines, [Imbo], with force and intimidation, did then and there willfully, unlawfully
and feloniously commit acts of lasciviousness upon [AAA], his own daughter, 11 years old, a
minor, by then and there forcing her to remove her shorts, mashing her breasts and private
parts and kissing her, thereby subjecting said complainant to sexual abuse, with lewd design
and against her will, which act debases, degrades or demeans the intrinsic worth of dignity of
[AAA] as a human being, to the damage and prejudice of the said offended party.
Imbo claimed that his wife CCC, AAA's mother merely fabricated such a story(In AAA's story
she screamed for her mother CCC 3 times and was not heard and she was only able to tell her
mother about the incident in the following morning) that he had raped his daughter.
Ultimately, Imbo claimed that on the night in question, within the period from 14 October
2003 to 25 January 2004, no crime occurred, his days ending as did his workday which were
from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
The RTC convicted Imbo of the crime of Acts of Lasciviousness and was sentenced to suffer
an indeterminate sentence of FOURTEEN (14) YEARS, EIGHT (8) MONTHS OF
RECLUSION TEMPORAL AS MINIMUM TO SEVENTEEN (17) YEARS, FOUR (4)
MONTHS OF RECLUSION TEMPORAL AS MAXIMUM in accordance with Section 5 of
Republic Act No. 7610, otherwise known as the Special Protection of Children Against Child
Abuse, Exploitation and Discrimination.
Issue:
W/N the Imbo is liable for the Crime of Acts of Lasciviousness
W/N Imbo is subject to the Penalty Imposed Under Sec 5 of RA7610 despite the fact that the
information failed to indicate its applicability?
Held:
Yes, Imbo has undoubtedly committed the Acts of Lasciviousness as all the elements of the
crime was sufficiently proven through the lone testimony of AAA which the court has held in
more than one occasion as more than sufficient to establish the guilt of the accused.1
1 Under Article 336 of the RPC, the elements of the crime of Acts of Lasciviousness are:
(1) That the offender commits any act of lasciviousness or lewdness;
(2) That it is done under any of the following circumstances:
a. By using force or intimidation; or
b. When the offended party is deprived of reason or otherwise unconscious; or
c. By means of fraudulent machination or grave abuse of authority; and
d. When the offended party is under 12 years of age.
(3) That the offended party is another person of either sex.

Yes, Imbo is Liable since under Sec 5 of RA 7610 such as in this When AAA a child was
coerced by her Father to indulge in acts of lasciviousness as sufficiently proven in the
information .2
With regard to the Penalty the court found that the RTC's decision should be modified by
applying the Indeterminate Sentence Law. According to the Courts The Indeterminate
Sentence Law is applicable to prison sentence both for an offense punished by the RPC and an
offense punished "by any other law." The correct application of the Indeterminate Sentence
Law has long been clarified in People v. Simon which ruled that the underscored portion of
Section 1 of the Indeterminate Sentence Law, i.e. the "offense is punished by any other law,"
indubitably refers to an offense under a special law where the penalty imposed was not taken
from and is without reference to the RPC.
The minimum term should be within the range of the penalty next lower to that prescribed by
the RPC, i.e. reclusion temporal in its minimum period of twelve (12) years and one (1) day to
fourteen (14) years and eight (8) months.
As for the maximum term of the imposable penalty on petitioner, the lower courts while
correct, should have mentioned Section 31(c), Article XII of R.A. No. 7610. The provision
takes into consideration the relationship between the parties, petitioner being AAAs father
With the aggravating circumstance of relationship and applying the Indeterminate Sentence
Law, the penalty imposed by the lower courts of seventeen (17) years, four (4) months of
reclusion temporal correctly does not exceed the maximum of the penalty range of reclusion
temporal in its medium period (14 years, 4 months and 1 day to 17 years and 4 months).

2 The elements of sexual abuse under Section 5, Article III of R.A. No. 7610 are:1.
The accused commits the act of sexual intercourse or lascivious conduct;
2. The said act is performed with a child exploited in prostitution or subjected to
other sexual abuse; and
3. The child, whether male or female, is below 18 years of age.