Renomeron, Dale Marie P.

BSEd 3 (BioSci)

June 6, 2014

Grading System
Exercise No.4
I.

Objective:
I will be able to construct and compute grades using the K-12 grading system with at least
90% accuracy.
I will be able to determine the proficiency level of the students using the K-12 grading
system with the accuracy of 90%.

II. Data:

Task: Constructs a sample computation of grades using the K-12 grading system.
Knowledge
Total
Score
20

Name

Process

15

Total
Score
25

Understanding

25

Total
Score
25

30

Products/
Performances
Total
%
Score
30
30

Final
Rating

Level of
Proficiency

100%

1. Aquino, Rudolfo C.

15

11.25

19

19.00

20

24.00

25

25.00

79.25

2. Bibat , Ernest T.

18

13.50

20

20.00

21

25.20

26

26.00

84.70

3. Caplor , Diego M.

19

14.25

22

22.00

23

27.60

29

29.00

92.85

4. Dante , Vina Gracia A.

16

12.00

21

21.00

22

26.40

27

27.00

86.40

5. Yamson, Alexander P.

17

12.75

20

20.00

20

24.00

28

28.00

84.75

Legend:
Level of Proficiency

Equivalent Numerical Value

(B) Beginning

74% and below

(D) Developing

75% - 79%

(AP) Approaching Proficiency

80% - 84%

(P) Proficient

85% - 89%

(A) Advanced

90% and Above

Computations:
1. Aquino, Rudolfo C.
Knowledge: 15%
Total Items: 20
Total Points Earned: 15

Process: 25%

15
15 =11.25 %
20

Total Items: 25

19
25 =19.00 %
25

Total Points Earned: 19

Understanding: 30%
Total Items: 25

20
30 =24.00 %
25

Total Points Earned: 20

Products/Performances: 30%
Total Items: 30
Total Points Earned: 25

Final Rating: 100%

25
30 =25.00 %
30
_________
79.25%

2. Bibat, Ernest T.
Knowledge: 15%
Total Items: 20

18
15 =13.50 %
20

Total Points Earned: 18

Process: 25%
Total Items: 25

20
25 =20.00 %
25

Total Points Earned: 20

Understanding: 30%
Total Items: 25

21
30 =25.20 %
25

Total Points Earned: 21

Products/Performances: 30%
Total Items: 30
Total Points Earned: 26

Final Rating: 100%

3. Caplor, Diego M.
Knowledge: 15%

26
30 =26.00 %
30
_________
84.70%

Total Items: 20

19
15 =14.25 %
20

Total Points Earned: 19

Process: 25%
Total Items: 25

22
25 =22.00 %
25

Total Points Earned: 22

Understanding: 30%
Total Items: 25

23
30 =27.60 %
25

Total Points Earned: 23

Products/Performances: 30%
Total Items: 30
Total Points Earned: 29

Final Rating: 100%

25
30 =29.00 %
30
_________
92.85%

4. Dante, Vina Gracia A.

Knowledge: 15%
Total Items: 20

16
15 =12.00 %
20

Total Points Earned: 16

Process: 25%
Total Items: 25

21
25 =21.00 %
25

Total Points Earned: 21

Understanding: 30%
Total Items: 25

22
30 =26.40 %
25

Total Points Earned: 22

Products/Performances: 30%
Total Items: 30
Total Points Earned: 27

27
30 =27.00 %
30
_________

Final Rating: 100%

86.40%

5. Yamson, Alexander P.
Knowledge: 15%
Total Items: 20

17
15 =12.75 %
20

Total Points Earned: 17

Process: 25%
Total Items: 25

20
25 =20.00 %
25

Total Points Earned: 20

Understanding: 30%
Total Items: 25

20
30 =24.00 %
25

Total Points Earned: 20

Products/Performances: 30%
Total Items: 30
Total Points Earned: 28

Final Rating: 100%

28
30 =28.00 %
30
_________
84.75%

III. Reflection:
This exercise was all about constructing and computing sample of grades of five imaginary
students using the K-12 grading system. I learned that in computing grades using the K-12 grading
system, you just need to compute the percentage of each four levels of assessment the: Knowledge,
Process, Understanding, and Products/Performances and then add the overall percentage to come up
with a grade with the corresponding levels of proficiency. After computing the grades, its the time that
you will be able to determine on what level of proficiency the child belongs either Advanced,
Proficient, Approaching Proficiency, Developing or Beginning. This activity is very useful to me. And
this will serve as my stepping stone as a future teacher, in a way, that this type of grading system will
help me to assess the performance of my students in the future.