Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
C 2000
Academic Press
INTRODUCTION
0021-9797/00 $35.00
494
495
THEORY
11251225
13501450
16251775
19502450
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
The inversion of (XT X)1 requires that the X matrix have full
mathematical rank. This is never the case for spectroscopic data
if we want to use the full spectral profile. Thus, we have to find
a new data matrix with the following properties: (1) It should
contain the spectral information of interest and (2) it should have
full mathematical rank. One technique for finding such a matrix
is briefly presented in the following paragraph.
Latent-variable regression techniques. Due to experimental noise spectroscopic data, matrices have a mathematical rank
equal to the number of spectra or to the number of wavelengths
(depending on which is the lowest). It is obvious that many of
these wavelengths contain the same information about the components in the sample. This dependence between wavelengths
gives the possibility of explaining the systematic spectral information by a small number of latent (underlying) variables.
Performing regression on latent variables solves the rank problem in multivariate linear regression. Partial least-squares (PLS)
regression is a latent-variable regression technique. PLS decomposes the X matrix into a set of uncorrelated latent variables, by
extracting the information in X that is correlated to the information in the y (response) vector. A general overview of latent
regression techniques can be found in the book by Martens and
Naes (16).
KALLEVIK, KVALHEIM, AND SJOBLOM
496
Chemicals
The crude oil was supplied from an Elf production field in
France. Decane, n-pentane, dichloromethane (DCM), methanol
(MeOH), and toluene were all of p.a. quality from Merck
Darmstadt, Germany. Silanol was obtained from Waters
Millipore Corp., and the electrolyte solution was prepared by
dissolving NaCl in distilled water, giving a salinity of 3.5%.
Extraction of Asphaltenes and Resins
The asphaltenes and resins were prepared by mixing the crude
and pentane (1 : 5) at room temperature. This mixture was centrifuged at 2400 rpm for 10 min. The precipitate is in the following defined as asphaltenes. The asphaltenes were then removed
and left at 50 C for 2 h. Two grams of silanol particles/milliliter
of crude were then added to the supernatant to adsorb the resin
fraction. The mixture was stirred, centrifuged at 1000 rpm for
3 min, and the supernatant removed. The particles were then
again mixed with pentane, stirred, and centrifuged at 1000 rpm
for 3 min. This procedure was repeated until the supernatant
was almost colorless. The process of desorption was done in
the same way as the washing, except for the use of a blend of
7% MeOH in DCM. The supernatant was collected at each step,
and the removal of the solvent was performed in a rotary evaporator at 70 C and then under a N2 atmosphere at room temperature.
Experimental Design
Table 2 gives the sample composition for the 16 experiments.
This experimental design is called a full factorial design with
two variables and four levels. The amount of asphaltenes is varied between 0 and 1.67 wt% of the total sample mass and the
amount of resins is varied between 0 and 3.33 wt%. The amount
of saltwater (3.5 wt% NaCl) is fixed to 8.0 g and the amount in
the oil phase is fixed to 12.0 g. The oil phase contains a 20/80
toluene/decane mixture (weight relation), in addition to the
asphaltenes and resins. The amount of the toluene/decane mixture is allowed to vary due to the obvious fact that all samples
TABLE 2
Full Factorial Design with Two Variables (Asphaltene and Resin)
and Four Levels (Amount of Asphaltenes and Resins Is Given in %
of the Total Oil Phase)
No.
Asphaltenes
Resins
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
0.00
0.56
1.11
1.67
0.00
0.56
1.11
1.67
0.00
0.56
1.11
1.67
0.00
0.56
1.11
1.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.11
1.11
1.11
1.11
2.22
2.22
2.22
2.22
3.33
3.33
3.33
3.34
must sum to 100%. The effect of this variation is assumed negligible (3 wt% variation of the total) and will not be further
commented on in this work.
Preparation of the Oil Phase
Asphaltene and toluene were mixed in a sample container
and left to equilibrate for 2 h. The components decane and resin
were added one by one, with the same 2-h delay between each
step. Two days after the preparation, the samples were exposed
to 1 min of ultrasonic treatment just before the near-infrared
sampling. The use of time delays was to ensure equilibrium
conditions.
Near-Infrared Measurements
The near-infrared sampling of the model systems was performed with a NirSystems 6500 spectrophotometer, equipped
with a fiber optic sampling probe for transmission sampling.
The wavelength region was set to 11002250 nm. The total path
length in the cell was 1.2 mm. The sample was stirred during
sampling. The total number of scans per spectrum was set to 32.
Emulsification
The emulsions were prepared by adding 40 wt% water phase
(3.5% NaCl) to the 60 wt% oil phase (including asphaltenes
and resins), followed by mixing at 2400 rpm on a Silverson
Laboratory Mixer Emulsifier Model STD 1, using an emulsor
screen head, for 2 min.
Emulsion Stability Measurements
The emulsion stability toward coalescence was recorded by
the method and instrumentation described by Gestblom and
497
FIG. 1. Near-infrared spectra of 16 model oil samples with asphaltenes and resins.
498
499
500
the predicted ones. This should give a straight line with an intercept equal to 0 and a slope equal to 1. Figure 8 shows the
regression coefficients (the b vector from Eq. [4]). The regression coefficients give weight to some of the regions with large
variation in Fig. 6, as expected. Figure 9 gives the prediction
501
TABLE 3
The Design, the Resin/Asphaltene Ratio, and the Emulsion Stability
Emulsion Stability
The results of the emulsion stability measurements are listed
in Table 3. Figure 11 shows the stability as a function of the
amount of asphaltene in the oil phase. The general trend is that
the stability increases with the amount of asphaltenes. An increased amount of asphaltenes results in a larger number of
surface-active aggregates (and possible bigger aggregates). The
explanation for the increased emulsion stability is that a larger
No.
Asphaltenes
Resins
Res/Asp
E cr
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
0.00
0.56
1.11
1.67
0.00
0.56
1.11
1.67
0.00
0.56
1.11
1.67
0.00
0.56
1.11
1.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.11
1.11
1.11
1.11
2.22
2.22
2.22
2.22
3.33
3.33
3.33
3.34
2.0
1.0
0.7
4.0
2.0
1.3
6.0
3.0
2.0
0.00
0.10
0.35
0.49
0.00
0.20
0.42
0.47
0.00
0.31
0.40
0.52
0.00
0.25
0.41
0.46
KALLEVIK, KVALHEIM, AND SJOBLOM
502
[5]
E Critical are the estimated responses. X asp and X res are the
amounts of asphaltene and resin, respectively. X asp asp and
X res res are the second-order effects of adding the two components, and X asp res is the interaction term between them. The constant term, the interaction term between asphaltenes and resins,
and the second-order effect of adding resins are not significant
at a 90% confidence level. The multiple regression coefficient
(R 2 ) for this model is 0.9679, which indicates a good fit of the
experimental data. The response surface is shown in Fig. 14.
The general trend is a curved increase in the stability with the
addition of asphaltenes. The presence of resins gives rise to a
minor curvature of the response surface.
The NIR spectra contain information on the amounts of asphaltenes and resins and also on the state of the asphaltene aggregates. Since these properties are important for emulsion stability,
we tried to model the stability from the original NIR spectra (not
from the differentiated spectra where information about the state
of the aggregates is deliberately removed). The result is shown in
Fig. 15 and the regression coefficients for the model are plotted
in Fig. 16. R 2 for this model is 0.784 and the intercept is 0.061.
The variance of the residuals is not uniform since we clearly see
a nonlinear structure relative to the regression line in Fig. 15.
This is no surprise since we already have shown that the relation
between the surface-active components and the emulsion stability is given by a second-order model (Eq. [5]). Reduction of
the nonlinear structure of the residuals was attempted by several
503
FIG. 15. Near-infrared prediction model for the emulsion stability. Statistics: R 2 = 0.784; intercept = 0.06; total variance explained (2 PLS components)
X, 99.7% and Y, 78.4%.
FIG. 16. Regression coefficients for the emulsion stability prediction model.
KALLEVIK, KVALHEIM, AND SJOBLOM
504
FIG. 17. NIR prediction model for the emulsion stability. Statistics: R 2 = 0.9406; intercept = 0.06.
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
1. Sheu, E. Y., and Mullins, O. C., Asphaltenes: Fundamentals and Applications. Plenum, New York, 1996.
2. Mullins, O. C., and Sheu, E. Y., Structures and Dynamics of Asphaltenes.
Plenum, New York, 1998.
3. Urdahl, O., Water-in-Crude Oil Emulsions from the Norwegian Continental Shelf: A Stabilization and Destabilization Study. Department of
Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, 1993.
4. McLean, J. D., and Kilpatrick, P. K., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 189(2),
242253 (1997).
5. McLean, J. D., and Kilpatrick, P. K., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 196(1), 2334
(1997).
6. Fordedal, H., Midttun, O., Sjoblom, J., Kvalheim, O. M., Schildberg, Y.,
and Volle, J. L., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 182(1), 117125 (1996).
7. Ese, M. H., Sjoblom, J., Fordedal, H., Urdahl, O., and Ronningsen, H. P.,
Colloids Surf. A 123, 225232 (1997).
8. Sjoblom, J., Fordedal, H., Jakobsen, T., and Skodvin, T., Handbook of
Surface and Colloid Chemistry (K. S. Birdi, Ed.), p. 217. CRC Press,
Boca Raton, FL, 1997.
9. Sjoblom, J., Saether, O., Ese, M. H., Urdahl, O., and Fordedal, H., in
Structures and Dynamics of Asphaltenes (O. C. Mullins and E. Y. Sheu,
Eds.), p. 337. Plenum Press, New York, 1998.
10. Sjoblom, J., Skodvin, T., Holt, O., and Nilsen, F. P., Colloids Surf. A 123,
593607 (1997).
11. McClure, W. F., Anal. Chem. 66(1), A43A53 (1994).
12. Mullins, O. C., Anal. Chem. 62, 508514 (1990).
13. Yudin, I. K., Nikolaenko, G. L., Gorodetskii, E. E., Kosov, V. I., Melikyan,
V. R., Markhashov, E. L., Frot, D., and Briolant, Y., J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 20(34),
297301 (1998).
14. Savitzky, A., and Golay, M. J. E., Anal. Chem. 36, 1627 (1964).
15. Sirius 6.5. Pattern Recognition Systems A/S, Bergen High-Technology
Center, N-5008 Bergen, Norway. http://www.prs.no.
16. Martens, H., and Ns, T., in Multivariate Calibration (T. Ns, Ed.), Wiley,
Chichester, 1989.
17. Efron, B., and Gong, G., Am. Stat. 37, 3748 (1983).
18. Fordedal, H., Nodland, E., Sjoblom, J., and Kvalheim, O. M., J. Colloid
Interface Sci. 173(2), 396405 (1995).
19. Fordedal, H., Schildberg, Y., Sjoblom, J., and Volle, J. L., Colloids Surf. A
106(1), 3347 (1996).
20. Fordedal, H., and Sjoblom, J., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 181(2), 589594
(1996).
21. Gestblom, B., Fordedal, H., and Sjoblom, J., J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 15(4),
449464 (1994).
22. Matlab 4.2c.1. The MathWorks, Inc., 24 Prime Park Way, Natick, MA
01760-1500. http://www.mathworks.com.
23. Mullins, O. C., and Zhu, Y. F., Appl. Spectrosc. 46(2), 354356
(1992).