Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Page
The authors of a new book challenge what they call the frantic pace
of contemporary university life.
By MOIRA FARR | March 29, 2016
In their new book, The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in
the Academy fittingly, with a snail on the cover Maggie Berg and Barbara
Seeber apply the principles of the slow movement to academia. Proudly
proclaiming themselves slow professors, the authors offer insights on how
to manage teaching, research and collegiality in an era when more
professors feel beleaguered, managed, frantic, stressed and demoralized
as they juggle the increasingly complex expectations of students, the
administration, colleagues and themselves. Distractedness and
fragmentation characterize contemporary academic life, they write. Todays
professors, they argue, need to slow down, devote more time to doing
nothing, and enjoy more pleasure in their research and teaching. Its time,
2
Page
they say, to take back the intellectual life of the university. They recently
spoke with writer Moira Farr forUniversity Affairs about the book.
University Affairs: How did you come to write this book together?
Maggie Berg: Over the years, Barbara and I were regularly calling one
another, in need of support, as we coped with the demands of our jobs. I
would be feeling guilty about not answering an email fast enough, or
ashamed to admit that I find it stressful switching to a new learning
management system, or regretting how I handled a situation in the
classroom. Were always so rushed. We had each done some independent
reading on the slow movement, books such as Carl Honors In Praise of
Slow. We were talking to each other about how we could change our sense of
time, and bring more pleasure to our academic lives. We were starting to ask
not What is wrong with us? but rather What is wrong with the system? At
some point in one of our conversations, I think I said, We should write this
down, and Barbara said, We should write this down.
Barbara Seeber: I was graduate program director in the English
department at Brock from 2008 to 2010. As part of that program, I taught a
course on research and professional development. Part of my preparation for
teaching that course was reading books on higher education as well as the
corporatization of the university, and that reading was part of what brought
me to write the book with Maggie. It got me reflecting on what the
assumptions are about being an academic. Today, the role of the professor is
constantly being effaced. Were no longer at the centre of the university. We
wanted to encourage people to counter the damaging effects of that. We
both felt we couldnt do this alone. Its tough to go against the grain, or to try
to shift peoples thinking. We knew that by writing this together, we would be
able to remind each other of our goal and purpose, and support each other
along the way.
UA: Why did you change the name of the book from The Slow
Campus to The Slow Professor?
Barbara Seeber: We changed it because we thought that focusing on the
campus would make the subject seem too big, too impersonal. The title is
important to our theme were talking about individual agency.
3
Page
4
Page
5
Page
6
Page
Page
Page
unusual degree of job security, too. (The stresses felt by part-time faculty are
massive but that's another topic.)
Teaching at the corporate university is no paradise, even for faculty with
tenure. I admire Berg and Seeber for asserting this fact clearly, explaining
why it's true and insisting that change through resistance is possible even
as they also convey just how joyful college teaching and scholarship can be.
I hope that college teachers will take time to savor The Slow Professor and
talk about it with each other at faculty reading groups. With slow food served
as refreshments, of course.
Page
I was teaching a class on Communication and Culture at LSU and middiscussion, a student raised his hand and said, I think class ended 5 minutes
ago I said that we could continue talking anyway, but that students were
free to leave if they had somewhere else to be. Two students left to go to
work, but the rest stayed for another 15 minutes to continue the discussion.
The pleasure of the discussion trumped our normal attachment to the
structure of time. In the next chapter Berg and Seeber note how the search
for knowledge in research makes it difficult to achieve flow since were
looking for something that does not yet exist. Rather, they argue, much great
scholarship stems from a search for understanding its our unique way of
understanding an idea that often makes our research matter. The issue, of
course, is that in a publish or perish culture understanding is never as
straightforward as the knowledge afforded by new data sets, so both getting
to the point of understanding and then translating that understanding to an
audience is often a much slower process. In light of the tenure clock always
ticking, its difficult to make an argument that we should leave our search for
knowledge in the hopes of gaining understanding, and Berg and Seeber are
not able to provide us with a way out of this bind, though they do offer
advice for how to seek understanding. Finally, they discuss the need for
collegiality and community, presenting some compelling arguments for both
the necessity and accessibility of these things.
The Slow Professor is a welcome reminder that there are others holding onto
the values of a pre-neoliberal Academy. This is especially comforting for
those of us who come across sites like The Professor is In, which may help
new graduate students prepare for the current academic landscape but does
nothing to challenge the normalization of the corporate model of education
(Kelsky practically chants Publish! Publish! Publish on every page,
reiterating the contention that output is valued higher than input).
While I thoroughly enjoyed The Slow Professor, it also made clear that Berg
and Seeber are writing towards academics with fairly uncomplicated lives,
i.e. those for whom a work/life balance might be or become an everyday
reality. Those of us living in commuter marriages, as single-parents, or caring
for a medically fragile family member are still in dire need of tactics that
make this a life worth living. The ideal, of course, is that by enacting the
ethos of the slow professor, those who can will slowly change the Academy
into something that is less corporate and more welcoming and healthy for all
involved.
[1] If youre reading this and wondering why does it matter if higher ed
takes on a more corporate culture? then I would argue you havent fully
Page
10
George Harrison wrote the Beatles Here Comes The Sun holed up at Eric
Claptons house, skiving a meeting with the executives at Apple Records.
Despite its optimism, the song always sounds deeply melancholic to me
because I cant hear it without whooshing back through time to a Sunday
evening years ago: Im in my childhood home, in my flannelette nightie,
freshly bathed, homework done and school shoes ready, watching the
closing credits at that time set to Harrisons song of
the Holiday programme on the BBC. Despite all its wistful jingling and
catchiness, that one song signalled the inescapable, stifling fact that the
weekend was Over. To become an academic is to submit oneself to that
Sunday evening feeling, seemingly in perpetuity.
The mental health of academics and administrators is at risk as never before.
We might, on any given term-time Sunday evening (or, indeed, on any
weekday night), prefer to be a skiver, like Harrison, but we find that the
pressures of what my students term adulting are simply too great to hide
from. The authors of The Slow Professor surely know that Sunday sensation
too, and their plea is that, in the interests of self-care, we should all slow
down and shift our thinking from what is wrong with us? to what is wrong
with the academic system?.
The Slow Food movement was initiated more than two decades ago by the
activist Carlo Petrini. Local producers were celebrated over supermarket
Page
11
Page
12
Century (2005), a text that the authors cite. Semenza reassures us that if on
a Thursday I realize that Ill need to read two books and grade ten papers by
Monday, Ill tackle the papers on Friday afternoon since I can more easily
sneak in reading at various times and places over the weekend. How did we
reach this point of feeling the need to sneak in work when we could be
spending time with our families, with our pets or with Tyrion Lannister?
(Asking for a friend.) We shouldnt punish ourselves for working for a living,
but we should ask more questions of a university culture that seems to
require us to live wholly for our work. The authors solutions arent
groundbreaking (We need to do less), but there is something oddly
comforting about seeing them articulated in such an engagingly open way.
Berg and Seeber came in for some pretty unkind pre-publication criticism.
Some bloggers and reviewers responded angrily to what they perceived as
the authors privilege: its far easier to reflect on life in a university, and,
indeed, to slow down, when your contract of employment is secure, and you
know for certain that you can make the rent. But the authors do
acknowledge their privilege: Those of us in tenured positions, given the
protection that we enjoy, have an obligation to try to improve in our own
ways the working climate for all of us. I liked this tone of advocacy; its
really hard to have to tell an enthusiastic grad student that she may never
get the academic job she dreams of but its not half as hard as it is to be
the one on the receiving end of that unpalatable truth.
And its important to remember that Berg and Seeber are agitating (if one
can agitate in a slow and unstressed way) for a complete cultural shift.
This, I fear, is impossible in the UK, where colleagues still speak of elite
universities, and organisations such as the Bullingdon Club persist. Indeed,
the Green Paper and the looming spectre of the teaching excellence
framework will further consolidate the divisions that already exist between
higher education institutions, and hopes for anything like a universal
implementation of a philosophy of slowness will certainly get trampled in the
unseemly clown-car scramble in which well soon see UK universities
participating. But I admire the authors optimism in expressing even the
possibility of something better than the status quo. The Slow Professor, as
Berg and Seeber themselves put it, is both idealistic in nature, and a call
to action.
Page
13
Finally, this is a very short book. And thats no bad thing: Im really busy and
Im really tired and reading for pleasure sometimes drops off my radar. But
writing book reviews is, I believe, a valuable act that can provide extra
ballast for the already flimsy barricades that so many of us are trying to
erect against the juggernaut of the neoliberal agenda. David Beer, reader in
sociology at the University of York, recently argued this case quite
brilliantly in these pages. And if youre still sceptical about what big things a
little book like this might do, I leave you with this perfect gem from the
manifesto: Talking about professors stress is not self-indulgent; nottalking
about it plays into the corporate model. If I had the time, Id stitch those
words into a sampler and hang it over my desk.
Maggie Berg, professor of English at Queens University, Kingston, was born
in Portsmouth, Hampshire, and raised on Hayling Island. My dad had a heart
attack at the age of 43 and left my mum with five young children (I was the
oldest). Although she had left school at 16 to become a hairdresser, Mum got
herself a job with thePortsmouth Evening News and we kids helped to bring
up each other. We were what is now called underprivileged. I was the first
person in my family to go to university, and if it hadnt been for the grants
system at the time I would not have done so. Because of this background, I
have never fitted comfortably in academia; it has left me with an awkward
combination of gratitude and scepticism. However, I believe it has also made
me a better teacher.
She now lives in Kingston Ontario, with Scott Wallis who is a brilliant visual
artist and a preparator in Queens University gallery for 30 years. We are
very different: I get up at 6am and go for a run; he stays at home smoking
cigarettes and drinking coffee. It works. Neither of us drives and we will
never own a car. Our daughter Rebecca used to be annoyed by this, but now
she is 26 she herself drives. Rebecca, who is the loveliest human being I
could ever have imagined, is pursuing an MA in Counselling Psychology at
the University of British Columbia. I asked her one day whether she would
practice couples counselling on me and her dad; she was horrified and flatly
refused.
What is the wisest book she has read of late? I have passed on, and
sometimes made my students read, Tom Chatfields How to Thrive in the
Digital Age, Sherry Turkles Reclaiming Conversation, and Dave Eggerss
novel The Circle. I realise just now that they have something in common:
Page
14
they urge us to consider that the very technologies that enhance our lives
also, in the words of Chatfield, have the potential to denude us of what it
means to thrive as human beings.
Asked whether she believes that academics are complicit in their own
oppression, she replies: Barbara and I would certainly not argue that
academics are oppressed: we are privileged to have worthwhile jobs that
we love, and that have flexible work hours; some of us are protected by
tenure. The corporate universitys exploitation of casual labour impoverishes
the climate for all of us, making it full of fear and resentment. We do argue
that academics are prone to overwork for a variety of reasons: we have
excessively high self-expectations; we are engaged in work which by its very
nature is never done; and, above all, we are subject to guilt as a result of
what Stephan Collini (in What Are Universities For?) calls the mythical
taxpayer.
In an effort not to seem either hopelessly outdated or privileged, academics
struggle to meet the raised expectations imposed by the corporate
university: to teach larger classes and to find innovative ways to do so, to
adapt to new learning technologies, and to cope with the downloading of
administrative tasks. In addition, we dont have time to read works on the
profession, which would give us a much-needed critical perspective.
What gives her hope? My students and my colleagues. My students
because they crave real human connection and intellectual discussion; they
want to be far more than clients. My colleagues because they are trying to
resist, in their own ways, the dehumanising and anti-intellectual effects of
the number-crunching corporate university.
Her co-author, Barbara Seeber, professor of English at Brock University, St
Catharines, Ontario, was born in Innsbruck in Austria, and lived there until
she was 13, when her family moved to the West Coast of Canada.
The slow food movement started in Italy but its principles are also cherished
in Austria, so I grew up in a culture that insists on everyday pleasures and
the conviviality of sharing a meal and conversation. I think that the
immigrant experience has shaped me in some fundamental ways. It
undoubtedly has enriched my perspective, but it also has led to feeling that I
dont quite fit in (both in Canada and in Europe).
Page
15
Page
16
17
Page
18
Page
alone. More than one-fifth of respondents said they suffered physical and
psychological problems related to stress, and a similar proportion reported
using anxiety medication, for example.
Reading the survey was like opening a window, Berg and Seeber wrote.
We shifted our thinking from what is wrong with us? to what is wrong with
the academic system?
Slow Professors quick answer to that last question is similar to many
articulated in recent critiques of the so-called corporate university (think
Benjamin Ginsburgs The Fall of the Faculty: The Rise of the AllAdministrative University and Why It Matters or Larry C. Gerbers The Rise
and Decline of Faculty Governance: Professionalization and the Modern
American University): the shift away from tenure-track positions, a shift
toward seeing the student as customer, and proliferating ranks of
administrators. What makes Berg and Seebers argument unique, however, is
that they reject the crisis language that dominates the many books that
have come before. Thats because such language communicates a
hopelessness they say they want to avoid and because, well, its too fast.
Instead, Slow Professor proposes with some optimism that professors -especially those with tenure -- have the power to change the direction of the
university by becoming the eye of the storm, working deliberately and
thoughtfully in ways that somehow now seem taboo.
Distractedness and fragmentation characterize contemporary academic life;
we believe that slow ideals restore a sense of community and conviviality
which sustain political resistance, Berg and Seeber say. Slow professors act
with purpose, cultivating emotional and intellectual resilience to the effects
of the corporatization of higher education.
Slow Professor is, by design, short on practical advice about just how to
become the eye of that storm. But drawing on the language and literature of
the slow movement, including Carl Honores In Praise of Slowness:
Challenging the Cult of Speedand Carlo Petrinis Slow Food Nation: Why Our
Food Should Be Good, Clean and Fair, the book discusses how the movement
might extend to academe. A discussion of time management, for example,
19
Page
20
Page
21
Page
Still, the authors reject any formal accounting of collegiality, such as its
consideration in tenure and promotion decisions. Instead, they propose
creating mutually supportive holding environments among colleagues.
Such spaces are based on the acknowledgment that our work has a
significant emotional dimension, whether it be disagreeing with a colleague
in a meeting, or finding a student guilty of a departure from academic
integrity, they say. And while risking candor to establish such environments
is challenging, Berg and Seeber admit, the reward is worth it.
Tenured Privilege?
Slow Professor was just released, but some advance publicity rubbed at least
one academic the wrong way. Responding toan article about the book in the
Canadian publicationUniversity Affairs, Andrew Robinson, a non-tenure-track
professor of physics at Carleton University in Canada, wrote on his blog, I
have never seen such a grotesque example of tenured faculty privilege.
Imagine, Canadian academics, some of the best-paid academics in the entire
[Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development] are deciding that
they want to slow things down and take it a bit easier. Because they are
overworked. Poor darlings. Lets hope we dont see the Slow Nurse or Slow
Doctor movements picking up amongst the professions. Why should
academia bathe in this self-indulgence?
As a non-tenure-track faculty member, Robinson wrote, I dont have this
luxury. My pay is so bad that I have to take as much work as possible, to
maintain even a modest standard of living. Im not part of the Canadian
middle class, by any measure of income. Tenured faculty earn at least three
times what I do. So my sympathy for them, as you might imagine, is
extremely limited.
Seeber declined an interview or to answer questions via email, saying,
Because the book has just come out, we want to give people time to read it
in order to avoid misunderstandings or oversimplifications. We also worked
hard to avoid prescriptive advice, and to be as clear and concise as possible
in the book itself.
22
Page
Slow Professor does address potential criticism, saying that even some of the
authors colleagues have questioned their desire to write a book challenging
the culture of academe.
While we acknowledge the systemic inequities in the university, a slow
approach is potentially relevant across the spectrum of academic positions,
Berg and Seeber wrote. Those of us in tenured positions, given the
protection that we enjoy, have an obligation to try to improve in our own
ways the working climate for all of us.
Ideally, Berg and Seeber say, This book will serve as an intervention. The
language of crisis dominates the literature on the corporate university,
urging us to act before it is too late. We are more optimistic, believing that
the resistance is alive and well. By taking time of reflection and dialogue,
the slow professor takes back the intellectual life of the university.
John Ziker, chair of anthropology at Boise State University, runs a faculty
time allocation study on his campus that found participants work 61 hours
per week and spend 17 percent of their workweek in meetings. Though he
hasn't read Slow Professor, he said the "frantic pace" it describes "is a reality
indeed." Still, Ziker said he thought the success of any slow professor
movement "would be very contextual," meaning the "individual goals,
disciplinary traditions and the particular university culture -- even political
climate of the state -- might have an impact.
The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the
Academy
by Maggie Berg and Barbara Seeber
Page
23
This has also given rise, in the past few years, to a burgeoning subfield of
literature that attempts to explain the precise state of crisis that we find
ourselves in.
As a doctoral student in the humanities, I am all too familiar with the
corporatized university's problems, as well as with proposed solutions that
sometimes feel as attainable as home ownership for millenials in Vancouver.
This is why I approached Maggie Berg and Barbara Seeber's new book, The
Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy,
somewhat warily.
The Slow Professor is Berg and Seeber's addition to anti-Corporate U lit, but
these authors, who are both tenured professors at Ontario universities, have
taken a slightly different track.
Berg and Seeber believe that most responses to the neoliberal university are
couched in the language of urgency and crisis, with arguments that
something must be done now (or yesterday) to save our country's
institutions of higher learning from imminent peril.
However, these responses only feed in to the culture of speed that the
modern university thrives on. Therefore, Berg and Seeber decided to apply
the principles of the Slow Food movement to the academy to suggest ways
of "taking time for reflection and dialogue."
In this way, they write, "the Slow Professor takes back the intellectual life of
the university."
While the principles of the Slow Food movement have been applied to
several different areas, from architecture to sex, Berg and Seeber write that
it "has not yet found its way into education."
Although this is not entirely true -- the feminist academic blog Hook and Eye
has beendiscussing the idea of the slow academy for several years -- this is
the first book to think about these ideas in a systematic way, and offer
concrete advice for how faculty and graduate students can apply these
principles to their professional lives.
Berg and Seeber are unabashedly optimistic about the change they think
individuals in the academy can create. While this focus on individualism does
somewhat undercut the real gains that unions and other forms of collective
Page
24
action can make for workers in the academy, the individual acts Berg and
Seeber suggest do have the potential to make changes at the level of
academic culture -- shifts that are perhaps less tangible for annual reports,
but no less impactful.
These include turning the way from the culture of "publish or perish,"
fostering "holding environments" for your colleagues, and thinking about
how relationships are central to learning.
The fact that Berg and Seeber write from a position of job security that is
becoming ever more rare in the academy has already earned their book a
sneering dismissal from blogger and sessional instructor Andrew Robinson,
who called it a "grotesque example of tenured faculty privilege."
The fact that precarious labour is becoming the norm in the academy
impacts everyone, including those with tenure. The fact that sessional
professors work extremely hard for meagre compensation doesn't discount
the stress that securely-employed faculty experience in their jobs.
Also, there are some parts of the book that can apply to anyone in the
academy. The chapter on "Pedagogy and Pleasure" includes mindfulness
techniques to help one approach teaching from a grounded, empathetic
place. "Time Management and Timelessness" dismisses unrealistic advice
proffered by time-management gurus and stresses the importance of setting
aside time for deep thinking and intellectual play.
Where I think The Slow Professor does falls short is in addressing how people
working within the corporatized university experience its effects differently
depending on the nature of their work.
Yes, tenured faculty are stressed out, but they are also enormously privileged
in comparison to sessional lecturers and graduate students. Berg and Seeber
acknowledge that that "contingent labour is ever on the rise," but they don't
really engage with this phenomenon in a substantive way.
Page
25
As such, they miss a real opportunity in this book to think about how
individuals can undercut the corporate university by bringing more people
into the circle. Tenured faculty have a responsibility to use their institutional
privilege to help make the university a more equitable place. This, to my
mind, is not at odds with the kinds of individual actions that Berg and Seeber
envision the Slow Professor performing.
These are only two ways Berg and Seeber could have engaged more
substantively with the problems of the corporate university without reverting
to the language of crisis and speed.
While The Slow Professor is a thought-provoking take on how to combat
neoliberal policies as they play out in our institutions, it misses the mark in
thinking about the ways individual acts of slowness can spiral outwards to
make for a more just system for all.
This one major drawback means that the book -- and some of its very good
advice -- risks turning into a mouthpiece for a few of the university's most
privileged members to continue talking only to each other.
Dream Factories: Why Universities Wont Solve the Youth Jobs Crisis
By Ken S. Coates and Bill Morrison
TAP Books/Dundurn, 232 pages, $21.99
Is there anything universities can do right? From allegations that they dont
prepare graduates for jobs, to charges that they exploit short-term
instructors to do much of the teaching, to questions about excessive
Page
26
Page
27
To their credit, the authors address this we have an obligation to try and
improve the working climate for all, they write. Every prof who steps off
their own personal treadmill puts another dent in the entire competitive race
of academia.
What they dont do, however, is question the assumption that competition is
bad for personal health and likely suboptimal for the academy. Many
academics thrive on competition and the rewards it brings, not just to them
but to their institutions, too.
For Ken S. Coates and Bill Morrison, competition is the defining feature of
higher education and the global economy. Unfortunately, they also argue,
few students know or act on that fact.
Lulled by parents into a false sense of their own importance, todays
university students follow their hearts right into unemployment. Far too
many, the authors believe, major in humanities and social sciences rather
than sticking to engineering or going to technical college.
Meanwhile, students in China, Brazil, Africa and other have-maybe regions
are ready and able to take technology and engineering jobs, and do them
better for less pay than our coddled twentysomething generation.
Coates and Morrison have built a national cottage industry around their call
for the transformation of higher education. Here, they expand on an idea
they have been developing in a series of essays over the past couple of
years. Their solution is to close the doors of the university for all but the
select few who are dedicated to deep learning and questioning. Everyone
else should do something more practical, with learning a trade or taking a
job (any job) among the best options.
To support their plan, they reference Germany and its system of co-ordinated
training between employers and educators. That rarely happens in North
America although Coates and Morrison show us one such example.
When the European companies Blum and Daetwyler set up factories in the
Southeastern United States, they could not find the workers they needed. So
they partnered with Central Piedmont Community College in Charlotte, N.C.,
found people who were willing to work and study at the same time, and paid
their salaries and tuition fees.
Page
28
The companies can spend more than $175,000 per graduate a substantial
corporate cost that is made up through easier transitions into the work
force, Coates and Morrison explain.
Perhaps its not universities that need to reform, but employers and their
willingness to invest in their workers. Thats not quite as catchy a book
subject though.
Incidentally, Dream Factories is targeted at the North American reader, but
makes no effort to distinguish between our largely publicly funded university
system and the tiered U.S. system. Many negative stats are followed by
variations on this throwaway nod: The Canadian results are better, in part
because of a strong high school system and a lower participation rate. But
the general direction is much the same.
In any case, the numbers on unemployed and underemployed university
graduates are almost cheerful when compared with the books vision of the
future. Robots will do everything though engineers and a few doctors may
survive. What will happen to the rest of us is presumably too frightening to
detail.
Coates and Morrison skip the part where we travel through the present to get
to the future, but its worthwhile asking: Who should be guiding the journey?
The engineer with a headlamp on his mining helmet who knows how to blast
ever deeper into a dark tunnel? The poet telling the story of how civilization
and community came undone? Or the social scientist trying to adapt to a
society without work?
Keep calm and think on. Thats the one thing universities have enabled so
many to do, and do (reasonably) well. The bleaker the future, the more that
might just come in handy.
On becoming a slow professor
Frankly, too much time has elapsed since the last entry in this blog. Pulled
into all directions by competing demands on my time and a resultant
poverty of time, I could not help but think about the effects of the modern
university on scholarship and teaching.
So, over the weekend I read the short book by Maggie Berg and Barbara
Seeber The Slow Professor (insightfully reviewed by Emma Rees in
Page
29
Page
30
Page
31