Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
In this study, we searched for murine analogues of the four death-receptor types (TRAIL-R1 to R4), targeted by the tumour necrosis factor
related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL), which were recently identified in the human brain. The expression of TRAIL-receptors in the
normal murine brain was investigated using antibodies directed against different epitopes of the human TRAIL-receptors. Mouse mutants, in
particular weaver and Lurcher with their well defined spatio-temporal patterns of neurodegeneration in the cerebellum, the inferior olive and
the substantia nigra, were used as a model for investigating a potential contribution of TRAIL-receptors to the genetically determined cell
death observed in these mutants.
Although all antibodies used, recognized the respective human antigens, only the murine analogue of the human TRAIL-R2 epitope was
also identified in the mouse brain. Antisera against human TRAIL-R1, TRAIL-R3 and TRAIL-R4 failed to reveal any other murine TRAILreceptor analogue. In normal mice, TRAIL-R2 is not universally expressed throughout the brain but rather restricted to specific neuronal
populations predominantly consisting of large neurons.
In weaver, the spatial patterns and relative densities of TRAIL-R2 labelling were virtually identical to those seen in wild-types during the
period of cell death in the cerebellum and the substantia nigra. In Lurcher, TRAIL-R2 expression in cerebellar granule cells and inferior olivary
neurons was identical to that in wildtypes but significantly reduced in Purkinje cells undergoing degeneration. Thus, although TRAIL-R2 is
found to be expressed in various cell types of the murine brain, cell death in weaver and Lurcher mutants is apparently not accompanied by
an upregulation of TRAIL-receptors.
2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: TRAIL-R2; Mouse brain; Neurodegeneration; Apoptosis; Purkinje cells; Substantia nigra
Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 30 8445 1675; fax: +49 30 8445 1602.
E-mail address: baeurle@zedat.fu-berlin.de (J. Baurle).
0304-3940/$ see front matter 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.09.009
47
to amino acids (aa) 427445 of human DR4 mature protein (1:200). (2) Monoclonal mouse anti-TRAIL-R1 (Alexis,
ALX-804-297A, 1:100) against recombinant TRAIL-R1:Fc.
(3) The extracellular domain (aa 24239) of human TRAILR1 (ALX-522-004), fused to the Fc portion of human IgG1.
TRAIL-R2: (1) Polyclonal rabbit anti-DR5 (TRAIL-R2;
AB16942, Chemicon), raised against a peptide corresponding
to aa 388407 of the human DR5 precursor (1:200). (2) aa
388407 of human DR5 (Chemicon) for pre-absorption of
anti-TRAIL-R2.
TRAIL-R3: (1) Polyclonal goat anti-TRAIL-R3 (ALX210-744), raised against a synthetic peptide corresponding to
aa 73103 of the extracellular domain of human TRAIL-R3
(1:200). (2) Monoclonal mouse anti human TRAIL-R3:Fc
(ALX-804-344A). (3) The extracellular domain (aa 25240)
of human TRAIL-R3 (ALX-522-006), fused to the FC portion of human IgG1.
TRAIL-R4: Polyclonal rabbit anti-DcR2 (TRAIL-R4; AB
16943, Chemicon), directed against aa 249263 of the human
DcR2 precursor (1:200).
Polyclonal rabbit anti-TH (9360-0004; Biotrend), raised
against native rat TH (1:1000).
Immunohistochemistry followed a standard protocol of
the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP)-method [20] using unconjugated secondary antibodies (Dako) at a dilution of 1:100
for 2 h. After 1 h incubation with the PAP-complex (1:50;
Dako) the binding sites were visualised by reacting peroxidase with 0.05% diaminobenzidine (DAB, Sigma) in Tris
buffered saline containing 0.03% H2 O2 for 5 min. Consecutive sections were also incubated with biotinylated or HRPconjugated secondary antibodies (Dako), respectively, to test
for possible method specific variation. Although all different
methods identified the same neuronal populations in the different murine strains, the PAP-method produced the lowest
unspecific background labelling. Age matched mutant and
wild-type brains were incubated and processed simultaneously in the same solutions. Omission of primary antisera
resulted in a complete lack of immunostaining in all cases
(see also Fig. 2A).
Dot blots, western blotting and pre-absorption: Cell
lysates of human HeLa and Jurkat DC+ cells, as well as cerebellar homogenates from normal, wv/wv and Lc/+ mice were
either spotted onto nitrocellulose (Protran BA 85, Schleicher
& Schuell) in a volume of about 0.2 l (equivalent to about
0.35 g protein; Lowry method) or subjected to SDSPAGE
electrophoresis on 12.5% polyacrylamide gels and blotted
(25 g; Lowry method) according to standard protocols. Dot
blots were immunoreacted together with brain sections of
age-matched mice. Immunodetection on western blots was
based on chemiluminescence (west femto substrate; Pierce,
USA). Prior to immunoincubation of blots and tissue sections
the primary antibodies were in several instances pre-absorbed
with their respective immunogen at molecular ratios of 1:3.
Purkinje cells (PC) and substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) neurons of wild-types and mutants were randomly sampled from TRAIL-R2-immunoreacted sections
48
Fig. 1. Specificity testing. (A) Dot blots immunoreacted for anti-TRAILR2. The left blot represents the not pre-absorbed condition, whereas the
right blot shows the pre-absorbed condition, where the blocking peptide
was added before the incubation. (B) The left hemisection from wv/wv was
pre-absorbed with the control peptide before immunoincubation with antiTRAIL-R2, whereas the right hemisection from +/+ was not pre-absorbed.
(C) Western blot with anti-TRAIL-R2 identifying 60 kDa Proteins in HeLa
whole cell lysates, as well as in the brain homogenates of normal (+/+)
and mutant mice (wv/wv and Lc/+). (D) Western blot with anti-TRAIL-R4
identifying a 35 kDa Protein in HeLa whole cell lysates (the trace on the
left). This protein could not be identified in the brain homogenates of normal
(+/+) and mutant mice (wv/wv and Lc/+) as documented by the absence of
any trace.
49
Fig. 2. Distribution of TRAIL-R2 immunoreactivity in the brain of wild-types and cerebellar mutants. (A) The absence of primary antiserum (control condition).
(B) Anti-TRAIL-R2 immunoreacted section from a 15-day-old wild-type sectioned at the same rostrocaudal level as shown in A. (C) Higher magnification of
the deep cerebellar and vestibular nuclei in a 19-day-old wv/wv mutant. (D) Cerebellar cortex of a 15-day-old wild-type. PC (white arrows) and a single Golgi
cell (GoC, black arrow) in the granular layer (GL) are immunopositive. (E) Ectopically located PCs (white arrows) of a 15-day-old wv/wv mutant. (F) PC (white
arrows) of a 15-day-old Lc/+ mutant. (G) Labeled neurons in the SNpc of a 12-month-old Lc/+ mutant. (H) Dense labelling of neurons (arrows) in the locus
coeruleus of a 12-month-old wild-type. (I) Trapezoid body of a 19-day-old wv/wv mutant. (J) TRAIL-R2 in the entorhinal cortex. Abbreviations: DL, dissecant
lamina; GL, granular layer; GoC, Golgi cell; ML, molecular layer; MNTB, medial nucleus of the trapezoid body; PC, Purkinje cell; PEL, principal external
lamina; PIL, principal internal lamina; PL, plexiform lamina; VNTB, ventral nucleus of the trapezoid body. Calibration bars: A, also valid for B: 1000 m; C:
300 m; D, also valid for E, F: 100 m; G: 100 m; H: 100 m; I, also valid for J: 100 m.
Although virtually all PC are lost during the first 34 postnatal weeks in Lc/+, TRAIL-R2 labelling of dying PC is paradoxically lower than seen in wild-types or wv/wv (Fig. 2DF
and Table 1). Note the almost identical brightness of PC in
+/+ and wv/wv (Table 1; level of significance: p = 0.589;
MannWhitney U-test). The brightness measured in Lc/+ PC
is significantly (p < 0.0005) higher than in wild-types, hence
reflecting a lower staining density. In the SNpc, no significant
density differences were detected between +/+ and wv/wv (p
= 0.37) or +/+ and Lc/+ (p = 0.26).
Here we present for the first time evidence for the expression of TRAIL-R2 on a translational level in the mouse
brain and demonstrate that the distribution of these receptors is restricted to predominantly large neurons, localised in
50
Table 1
Mean brightness and standard deviation values of anti-TRAIL-R2 immunoreacted Purkinje cells (PC) and neurons of the substantia nigra pars
compacta (SNpc) at P15
+/+
wv/wv
Lc/+
PC (n)
Mean brightness
249
124.3 (6.4)
251
125.2 (7.3)
251
137.9 (7.4)
SNpc (n)
Mean brightness
242
108.2 (10.1)
257
108.2 (7.4)
258
109.1 (11)
rather few brain regions. The absence of other human TRAILR analogues in the murine brain is consistent with results
from molecular cloning and biochemical experiments, describing only one murine homologue to the currently known
human TRAIL-R [6,24]. Antibodies directed against epitopes
of the human decoy receptors TRAIL-R3 and TRAIL-R4
failed to detect the recently described murine decoy receptors mDcTRAIL-R1 and mDcTRAIL-R2 [15] in the brain.
The absence of stained cells may reflect the low degree of sequence homology between the human and the murine decoy
receptors [15] rather than their absence in the brain.
As TRAIL-R2 is considered a functional death receptor
with an apoptosis-inducing capability [2,9,14,23], its sheer
presence in the mouse brain may indicate its participation in
inducing and regulating neuronal death. The appearance of
three bands (see Fig. 1C) rather than just the two described
in human as TRICK2A and TRICK2B [16], open the possibility that there is an additional not yet described murine
isoform. The selective expression of TRAIL-R2 in only a
few neuronal populations further suggests a particular role in
the apoptotic processes of these cells. Hence, a potential role
of TRAIL-R2 in regulating death in these specific neurons
may be revealed in those animal models where these cell
populations perish during primary and transsynaptic apoptotic processes. In wv/wv, GC, PC and SNpc neurons undergo postnatal degeneration [13] and in Lc/+, massive cell
loss occurs in the PC-, GC- and IO-populations [1,17]. From
this study, PC, as well as SNpc neurons are both TRAIL-R2
immunopositive in the normal mouse brain, while GC and
IO neurons do not express TRAIL-R2 in wild-types. Yet, the
results from wv/wv and Lc/+ mutants are not supportive of
a role for TRAIL-R2 in the cell death of either PC or SNpc
nor GC and IO neurons. Although the apoptotic nature of GC
death in wv/wv is indicated by caspase activation in these neurons [10], cerebellar GC of wv/wv remain immunonegative
for TRAIL-R2, even at the peak of neurodegeneration. Similarly, the labelling patterns and staining intensities of PC and
neurons in the SNpc of the wild-type are not different from
those in wv/wv. These observations seem incompatible with a
possible role of TRAIL-R2 in regulating the primary as well
as the trans-synaptic cell death in wv/wv mice.
Although active caspase-3 is found in dying PC, GC and
IO neurons of Lc/+ mutants [17], TRAIL-R2 labelling was
also absent in the GC-layer and in the IO of Lc/+ at all stages
of neurodegeneration. Paradoxically, the TRAIL-R2 staining intensity of PC in Lc/+ was even lower than in +/+ and
wv/wv, indicating a reduced, rather than enhanced TRAIL-R2
expression in dying PC of Lc/+. This low level of TRAIL-R2
in Lc/+ PC may reflect a possible functional and structural
decline of PC prior to their death rather than a downregulation
of receptor density.
Although TRAIL-induced apoptosis could presumably be
involved in age-related neuronal loss, the differential spatial
distribution of TRAIL-R2 throughout the murine brain is apparently invariant to the age of the mice. The anisotropic
TRAIL-R2 expression in the mouse brain may thus reflect
intrinsic neuronal features unrelated to the momentary apoptotic state in wv/wv or Lc/+. Furthermore, as spatial receptor distributions remain invariant over the lifespan examined,
TRAIL-R2 expression does not mirror developmental or agerelated cell loss.
Conceivably, TRAIL-induced cell death may be regulated
by mechanisms, which do not alter the expression and/or
distribution of TRAIL-receptors.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Miss H. Wolynski for expert technical
assistance and Miss G. Beyer for donating the human cell
lines. This study was supported in part by the Sonnenfeld
Stiftung.
References
[1] K.W.T. Caddy, T.J. Biscoe, The number of Purkinje cells and olive
neurons in the normal and lurcher mutant mouse, Brain Res. 111
(1976) 396398.
[2] P.M. Chaudhary, M. Eby, A. Jasmin, A. Bookwalter, J. Murray,
L. Hood, Death receptor 5, a new member of the TNFR family,
and DR4 induce FADD-dependent apoptosis and activate the NF-B
pathway, Immunity 7 (1997) 821830.
[3] J. Dorr, I. Bechmann, S. Waiczies, O. Aktas, H. Walczak, P.H.
Krammer, R. Nitsch, F. Zipp, Lack of tumor necrosis factor-related
apoptosis-inducing ligand but presence of its receptors in the human
brain, J. Neurosci. 22 (2002) 15.
[4] S. Frank, U. Kohler, G. Schackert, H.K. Schackert, Expression of
TRAIL and its receptors in human brain tumors, Biochem. Biophys.
Res. Commun. 257 (1999) 454459.
[5] P. Golstein, Cell death: TRAIL and its receptors, Curr. Biol. 7 (1997)
750753.
[6] A. Grosse-Wilde, H. Stahl, M.R. Sprick, M.A. Weigand, T. Ganten,
H. Walczak, Biochemical analysis of murine TRAIL receptors, The
Third European Workshop on Cell Death, Salobrena, Spain, 2002.
[7] M. Matysiak, A. Jurewicz, D. Jaskolski, K. Selmaj, TRAIL induces
death of human oligodendrocytes isolated from adult brain, Brain
125 (2002) 24692480.
[8] R. Nitsch, I. Bechmann, R.A. Deisz, D. Haas, T.N. Lehmann, U.
Wendling, F. Zipp, Human brain-cell death induced by tumournecrosis-factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), Lancet
356 (2000) 827828.
[9] G. Pan, J. Ni, Y.F. Wei, G. Yu, R. Gentz, V.M. Dixit, An antagonist
decoy receptor and a death domain-containing receptor for TRAIL,
Science 277 (1997) 815818.
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
51