Aspect: The change in Father Paneloux view on human suffering after
he witnesses the death of Jacque Othon, as shown in his two sermons.
Panelouxs original view, in his first sermon, on the suffering of the
town citizens was that it was divine punishment by God, a higher meaning, and that there was no method with which they could prevent more deaths, they could only pray for forgiveness. Here, he addresses the audience by excluding himself, thereby detaching himself from the suffering of others. However, he then witnesses the death of Jacques Othon, an innocent child who had not done anything to deserve punishment and must face the meaninglessness of human suffering. Paneloux becomes confused with his own faith because God should not allow such unjust suffering to occur. His conclusion is seen during his second sermon when he claims that one must either accept that even seemingly meaningless punishment is part of a higher purpose set by God, or not have faith at all, admitting that it may not have been God who caused the deaths of the town citizens. This time, he addresses himself along with the audience, becoming more sympathetic and involved. He dies, believing that his death is an act of God, choosing to believe everything and not relying on a doctor, instead of losing his faith.
Camus includes this in the novel to suggest the tendency of religious
institutions to abstract meaningless and absurd human suffering into
something eternal and meaningful such as an act of God, becoming detached from the physical world and reality. However, it does not explain the torturous death of Jacque Othon. Camus suggests that when faced with the absurd suffering caused by an unjust God, people with faith will have to accept that the eternal significance that humans long for may not exist. Faith may only be a tragic hope in understanding evil and death.
Topic: The Abstraction of Human Suffering by Faith during Father