Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 7 Part 1
Radar Cross Section
Dr. Robert M. ODonnell
IEEE New Hampshire Section
Guest Lecturer
Propagation
Medium
Target
Radar
Cross
Section
Power
Amplifier
Waveform
Generation
T/R
Switch
Antenna
Receiver
Pulse
Compression
Clutter Rejection
(Doppler Filtering)
Tracking
Parameter
Estimation
Thresholding
Detection
Data
Recording
Photo Image
Courtesy of US Air Force
Used with permission.
Radar Systems Course 2
Radar Cross Section 1/1/2010
Radar Cross Section (RCS) is the hypothetical area, that would intercept the
incident power at the target, which if scattered isotropically, would produce
the same echo power at the radar, as the actual target.
Radar Systems Course 3
Radar Cross Section 1/1/2010
Transmitted Pulse
Target Cross Section
Received Pulse
Figure by MIT OCW.
R
Distance from Radar to Target
Cannot Control
S
=
N
(4)3 R4 k TS Bn L
Cannot Control
Radar Systems Course 5
Radar Cross Section 1/1/2010
Outline
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
-60
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
M107 Shell
for
155mm Howitzer
40
S Band
VV
Polarization
20
-20
Courtesy of Federal Aviation Administration
90
180
Aspect Angle (degrees)
Cessna 150L (in takeoff)
270
360
0.02
2
10
10,000
100 - 200
2
1
10-2 - 10-3
10-4 - 10-5
Adapted from Skolnik, Reference 2
Outline
Inlet
Body Shape
Exhaust
Seeker
Control Surfaces
Altimeter
Scattering Mechanisms
for an Arbitrary Target
Diffraction at
Corner
Gap, Seam, or
Discontinuity
Echo
Multiple
Reflection
Curvature
Discontinuity
Return
Backscatter
from
Creeping Wave
o
ch
E
ve
Wa
m
f ro
v
Tra
Specular
Surface
Reflection
ave
W
g
elin
Edge
Diffraction
Tip
Diffraction at
Aircraft Nose
Return
From
Engine Cavity
Tip
Diffraction from
Fuel Tank
20
Fuselage
Specular
RCS (dBsm)
10
Wing Leading
Edge
X-Band
HH Polarization
Waterline Cut
0
-10
-20
-30
0
60
120
180
240
Aspect Angle (degrees)
300
360
Adapted from Atkins, Reference 5
Courtesy of MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Outline
Theoretical Prediction
Scaled Model Measurements
Courtesy of MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Used with Permission
Target on Support
Courtesy of U. S. Navy.
Main
Reflector
Target
Plane
Wave
Low RCS
Pylon
Feed
Antenna
Radar Systems Course 20
Radar Cross Section 1/1/2010
Sub-Reflector
IEEE New Hampshire Section
IEEE AES Society
Full Scale
Measure at frequency f
Courtesy of MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Used with Permission
Radar Systems Course 21
Radar Cross Section 1/1/2010
Scale Factor
S
(Reduced Size)
Subscale
Measure at frequency S x F
Quantity
Full Scale
Subscale
Length
L = L / S
Wavelength
= / S
Frequency
f = S f
Time
t = t / S
Permittivity
Permeability
Conductivity
g = S g
= / S2
Outline
Introduction
A look at the few simple problems
RCS prediction
Exact Techniques
Finite Difference- Time Domain Technique (FD-TD)
Method of Moments (MOM)
Approximate Techniques
Geometrical Optics (GO)
Physical Optics (PO)
Geometrical Theory of Diffraction (GTD)
Physical Theory of Diffraction (PTD)
10
Higher Wavelengths
Lower Wavelengths
Rayleigh Region
>> a
= k / 4
Optical
Region
<< a
>> a
10-1
Mie or Resonance
Region
Oscillations
Backscattered
wave interferes
with creeping wave
Resonance or Mie
Region
Rayleigh
Region
Optical Region
<< a
= a2
Surface and edge
scattering occur
a
10-2
10-3
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.7 1
10
20
Circumference/ wavelength = 2a /
IEEE New Hampshire Section
IEEE AES Society
( >> a)
( ~ a)
( << a)
Complex targets:
Examples: Aircraft, Missiles, Ships)
RCS changes significantly with very small changes in frequency
and / or viewing angle
See Ref. 6 (Levanon), problem 2-1 or Ref. 2 (Skolnik) page 57
Orientation
Approximate RCS
2
4 A eff
/ 2
Corner Reflector
Flat Plate
4 A 2 / 2
4 A 2 / 2
a1 a 2
Straight Edge
2 /
Curved Edge
a/2
Cone Tip
Axial incidence
2 sin 4 ( / 2)
Where:
( >> a)
( ~ a)
( << a)
Complex targets:
Examples: Aircraft, Missiles, Ships)
RCS changes significantly with very small changes in frequency
and / or viewing angle
See Ref. 6 (Levanon), problem 2-1 or Ref. 2 (Skolnik) page 57
Electromagnetism Problem
r
A plane wave with electric field, E I , impinges on the target of
interest and some of the energy scatters back to the radar
antenna
r 2
ES
2
Since, the radar cross section is given by: = lim 4 r r 2
r
EI
All we need to do is user Maxwells Equations to calculate the
scattered electric field ES
Thats easier said that done
Before we examine in detail these different techniques, lets
review briefly the necessary electromagnetism concepts and
formulae, in the next few viewgraphs
Maxwells Equations
r r
r r
B( r , t )
E(r , t ) =
t
r r
r r
D(r , t )
H(r , t ) =
t
r r
D(r , t ) = 0
r r
B( r , t ) = 0
r r
r r
D(r , t ) = o E(r , t )
r r
r r
B( r , t ) = o H ( r , t )
r r
r r
E (r ) = i B (r )
r r
r r
H (r ) = i D (r )
r r
D (r ) = 0
r r
B (r ) = 0
Time dependence
{
{
r r
E (r , t ) = Re
r r
H (r , t ) = Re
}
}
r r i t
E (r ) e
r r i t
H(r ) e
Boundary Conditions
Medium 1
1 1
Medium 2
2 2
r r
E1 H 1
r
r
E2 H 2
Surface
Boundary
r
r
Tangential components of E and H are continuous:
r
r
n x E1 = n x E 2
r
r
n x H 1 = n x H 2
r
n x E = 0
Radiation condition:
As
r r
1
E(r )
r
IEEE New Hampshire Section
IEEE AES Society
Scattering Matrix
Scattering Matrix - S
S VH E VI
S HH E HI
HH = 4 S HH
2
2
VH = 4 S VH
For and a reciprocal medium and for monostatic radar cross
section:
RR , LL , RL
Introduction
A look at the few simple problems
RCS prediction
Exact Techniques
Finite Difference- Time Domain Technique (FD-TD)
Method of Moments (MOM)
Approximate Techniques
Geometrical Optics (GO)
Physical Optics (PO)
Geometrical Theory of Diffraction (GTD)
Physical Theory of Diffraction (PTD)
RCS Method
Approach to Determine
Surface Currents
Maxwells Equations in
Rectangular Coordinates
=0
Examine 2 D problem no y dependence:
y
HZ
H Y = o
EX
y
z
t
EX
EZ = o
HY
z
x
t
HY
H X = o
EZ
x
y
t
H-field polarization
H Y EX EZ
Radar Systems Course 37
Radar Cross Section 1/1/2010
EZ
E Y = o
HX
y
z
t
HX
H Z = o
EY
x
t
z
EY
E X = o
HZ
x
y
t
E-field polarization
EY H X H Z
IEEE New Hampshire Section
IEEE AES Society
Maxwells Equations in
Rectangular Coordinates
=0
Examine 2 D problem no y dependence:
y
Equations decouple into H-field polarization and E-field
polarization
=0
=0
HZ
H Y = o
EX
EZ
E Y = o
HX
t
y
z
t
z
y
EX
EZ = o
HY
z
x
t
HY
H X = o
EZ
x
y
t
=0
H-field polarization
H Y EX EZ
HX
H Z = o
EY
t
x
z
EY
E X = o
HZ
t
y
x
=0
E-field polarization
EY H X H Z
IEEE New Hampshire Section
IEEE AES Society
H-field polarization:
o
H Y (x, y , t ) =
E X (x, y , t )
t
z
E Z (x, y , t )
x
Yees
Lattice
(2-D)
HY
Ex
EZ
z
y
Discrete form:
o
T
X
Z
T
X
Z
T
+
+
+
+
+
H
x
,
z
,
t
H
x
,
z
,
t
o
o
Y o
o
o
Y o
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
Z
X
X
+
+
+
E
x
,
z
,
t
E
x
,
z
,
t
o
Z
o
X
o
o
o
X o
2
2
1
X
Z
Z
+
E
x
,
z
,
t
E
x
,
z
,
t
X
o
o
Z
o
o
o
Z o
2
2
1
1
1st Order ABC
2 z + x + c t Hy = 0
HY
Scattered Field
Total Field
Ex
EZ
Target
E TAN = 0
Domain of Computation
2nd Order ABC
Layer Perfectly Matched
Perfect Conductor
1 2
1 2 1 2
Hy = 0
+ 2 2
2
2 x
c x t c t
Absorbing Boundary Condition (ABC) Used to Limit Computational Domain
Reflections at exterior boundary are minimized
Traditional ABCs model field as outgoing wave to estimate field quantities outside
domain
More recent perfectly matched layer (PML) model uses non-physical layer, that
absorbs waves
IEEE New Hampshire Section
Radar Systems Course 40
IEEE AES Society
Radar Cross Section 1/1/2010
Case 2 Plate II
Hi
Ei
Ei
15 deg
Case 4 Cylinder I
Ei
Hi
Hi
Hi
Case 5 Cylinder II
Ei
Hi
15 deg
Case 6 Cavity
Ei
Hi
0.5 m
Ey
4m
Courtesy of
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Used with Permission
Case 1
Courtesy of
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Used with Permission
Courtesy of
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Used with Permission
2m
Courtesy of
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Used with Permission
Case 5
Courtesy of
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Used with Permission
Courtesy of
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Used with Permission
Specular
Return