Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction: The purposes of this study were to evaluate and compare the immediate effects of rapid maxillary
expansion (RME) in the transverse plane with Haas-type and hyrax-type expanders by using cone-beam
computed tomography. Methods: A sample of 33 subjects (mean age, 10.7 years; range, 7.2-14.5 years)
with transverse maxillary deciency were randomly divided into 2 groups: Haas (n 5 18) and hyrax (n 5 15).
All patients had RME with an initial activation of 4 quarter turns followed by 2 quarter turns per day until the
expansion reached 8 mm. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were taken before expansion and at the
end of the RME phase. Maxillary transversal measurements were compared by using the mixed analysis of
variance (ANOVA) model and the Tukey-Kramer method. Results: RME increased all maxillary transverse
dimensions (P \0.0001). There was less expansion at skeletal than dental levels. The hyrax group had greater
statistically signicant orthopedic effects and less tipping tendency of the maxillary rst molars compared with
the Haas group. Conclusions: Both appliances were efcient in correcting a transverse maxillary deciency.
The pure skeletal expansion was greater than actual dental expansion. The hyrax-type expander produced
greater orthopedic effects than did the Haas-type expander, but this effect was less than 0.5 mm per side and
might not be clinically signicant. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:366-76)
366
Weissheimer et al
367
Fig 1. A, Haas-type expander and B, hyrax-type expander at the end of the active phase of RME.
Fig 2. Transverse maxillary posterior region evaluation: A and B, preexpansion; C and D, at the end of
the active phase of expansion.
Weissheimer et al
368
with 1.4-mm stainless steel extensions soldered to the lingual surfaces of each pair of bands, was used (Fig 1, B).
Both appliances had expansion jackscrews with activations of a quarter turn equivalent to a 0.2-mm expansion. All patients in the Haas and hyrax groups had RME,
with initial activations of 4 quarter turns (0.8 mm)
followed by 2 quarter turns per day (0.4 mm) until the
expansion screw reached 8 mm.
The i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Hateld,
Pa) was used to obtain CBCT images before RME (T1)
and at the end of the active expansion phase (T2). The
CBCT scans were performed at 120 kV, 8 mA, scan
time of 40 seconds, and 0.3-mm voxel dimension. The
data for each patient were reconstructed with 0.3-mm
slice thickness, and the digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) images were assessed by using the EFILM workstation software program (version
2.1.2, Merge Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wis). All linear
and angular measurements were made by a blinded examiner (M.M.), who had no access to the data or the clinical consultations of the patients in this sample.
For transverse maxillary posterior region evaluation,
the DICOM les with CBCT images at T1 and T2 were imported into EFILM and visualized as axial images
arranged side by side. To obtain standardized axial and
coronal slices and thus allow the comparisons between
T1 and T2, the following references were used. In the
Weissheimer et al
369
Posterior baseline
Line 13-14
Anterior baseline
Distance 5-6
Distance 11-12
Distance 15-16
Distance 17-18
Distance 21-22
Alveolar
Distance 3-4
Distance 19-20
Dental
Distance 7-8
Distance 9-10
Angle 1MD
Angle 1ME
Line formed by the 2 lower points at the inferior inner contour of the
posterior nasal cavity on the right and left sides, respectively.
Line formed by the 2 lower points at the inferior inner contour of the anterior
nasal cavity on the right and left sides, respectively.
Distance between points 5 and 6 (points formed by the intersection of the
line 1-2 with buccal contour of maxilla on the right and left sides,
respectively).
Distance between points 11 and 12 (lower points at medial limits of maxillary
palatine processes, on the right and left sides, respectively), representing
the midpalatal suture.
Distance between points 15 and 16 (points formed by the intersection of line
13-14 with buccal contour of maxilla on the right and left sides,
respectively).
Distance between points 17 and 18 (intersection of the straight line, which is
parallel and 5 mm superior to line 13-14, with buccal contour of maxilla
on the right and left sides, respectively).
Distance between points 21 and 22 (lower points at medial limits of maxillary
palatine processes, on the right and left sides, respectively), representing
the midpalatal suture in the anterior region.
Distance between points 3 and 4 (coronal-most points of the maxillary
buccal alveolar processes, on the right and left sides, respectively).
Distance between points 19 and 20 (intersection of the straight line, which is
parallel and 5 mm inferior to line 13-14, with buccal contour of maxilla on
the right and left sides, respectively).
Distance between points 7 and 8 (points formed by the intersection of
a straight line, that superimpose the long axis of the root canal of rst
permanent molar palatine root, with the occlusal surface on the right and
left sides, respectively).
Distance between points 9 and 10 (apices of palatine root of permanent rst
molars, on the right and left sides, respectively).
Angle formed by the straight line from point 7 and that superimposes the
long axis of the root canal of permanent rst molar palatine root, on the
right side, with line 1-2.
Angle formed by the straight line from point 8 and that superimposes the
long axis of the root canal of permanent rst molar palatine root, on the
left side, with the line 1-2.
Weissheimer et al
370
Fig 4. Transverse maxillary anterior region evaluation: A and B, preexpansion; C and D, at the end of
the active phase of expansion.
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
The overall immediate effects of RME on the transverse plane are shown in Table III. There were signicant increases in maxillary width at the skeletal,
alveolar, and dental levels for both the Haas (Table
IV) and the hyrax (Table V) groups in all parameters
(P \0.05). There was less expansion at the skeletal
than at the dental level, just as the increase in the maxillary apical base was smaller in the posterior region
(distances 5-6 and 11-12) compared with the anterior
(distances 15-16, 21-22) (Tables III-V). The hyrax
group had greater statistically signicant increases in
the maxillary transverse dimensions at the skeletal
level than did the Haas group in both posterior
(distances 5-6 and 11-12) and anterior (distance 2122) regions (Table VI). There was no signicant difference between the groups for the buccal inclination of
the maxillary rst permanent molars, except for the
Weissheimer et al
371
surements
Measurement
Distance 5-6
Distance 11-12
Distance 15-16
Distance 17-18
Distance 21-22
Distance 3-4
Distance 19-20
Distance 7-8
Distance 9-10
Angle 1MD
Angle 1ME
ICC
0.98
0.94
0.96
0.95
0.61
0.98
0.96
0.95
0.97
0.93
0.74
Weissheimer et al
372
Table III. Immediate changes in the maxillary transverse plane with RME
T1
Variable
Skeletal
Distance 5-6 (mm)
Posterior apical base width
Distance 11-12 (mm)
Posterior midpalatal suture width
Distance 15-16 (mm)
Anterior apical base width (inferior)
Distance 17-18 (mm)
Anterior apical base width (superior)
Distance 21-22 (mm)
Anterior midpalatal suture width
Alveolar
Distance 3-4 (mm)
Posterior width at alveolar crest level
Distance 19-20 (mm)
Anterior width at midalveolar level
Dental
Distance 7-8 (mm)
Intermolar width at occlusal surface
Distance 9-10 (mm)
Intermolar width at palatal root apices
Angle 1MD ( )
Right rst molar angulation
Angle 1ME ( )
Left rst molar angulation
T2
Change
Mean
SE
Mean
SE
Mean
SE
60.29
0.64
62.93
0.64
2.64
0.11
\0.0001*
00.00
0.08
02.86
0.08
2.88
0.09
\0.0001*
38.37
0.61
41.85
0.61
3.48
0.23
\0.0001*
38.96
0.83
41.78
0.83
2.82
0.23
\0.0001*
00.00
0.10
04.00
0.11
4.00
0.13
\0.0001*
51.65
0.51
57.28
0.51
5.63
0.16
\0.0001*
40.06
0.58
44.46
0.58
4.40
0.22
\0.0001*
43.51
0.44
51.31
0.44
7.80
0.15
\0.0001*
29.90
0.52
32.55
0.52
2.65
0.14
\0.0001*
110.6
1.4
118.1
1.4
7.53
0.74
\0.0001*
117.7
1.2
123.8
1.2
6.17
0.68
\0.0001*
Weissheimer et al
373
Table IV. Immediate changes in the maxillary transverse plane with RME in the Haas group
T1
Variable
Skeletal
Distance 5-6
Posterior apical base width
Distance 11-12
Posterior midpalatal suture width
Distance 15-16
Anterior apical base width (inferior)
Distance 17-18
Anterior apical base width (superior)
Distance 21-22
Anterior midpalatal suture width
Alveolar
Distance 3-4
Posterior width at alveolar crest level
Distance 19-20
Anterior width at midalveolar level
Dental
Distance 7-8
Intermolar width at occlusal surface
Distance 9-10
Intermolar width at palatal root apices
T2
Change
Mean (mm)
SE (mm)
Mean (mm)
SE (mm)
Mean (mm)
SE (mm)
61.10
0.87
63.29
0.87
2.19
0.15
\0.0001*
00.00
0.11
02.61
0.11
2.62
0.12
\0.0001*
38.98
0.82
42.28
0.82
3.29
0.30
\0.0001*
39.70
1.12
42.33
1.12
2.62
0.31
\0.0001*
00.00
0.15
03.63
0.15
3.63
0.17
\0.0001*
51.96
0.69
57.41
0.69
5.44
0.25
\0.0001*
40.56
0.79
44.59
0.79
4.03
0.30
\0.0001*
43.42
0.59
51.12
0.59
7.70
0.20
\0.0001*
30.57
0.71
32.72
0.71
2.15
0.18
\0.0001*
Table V. Immediate changes in the maxillary transverse plane with RME in the hyrax group
T1
Variable
Skeletal
Distance 5-6
Posterior apical base width
Distance 11-12
Posterior midpalatal suture width
Distance 15-16
Anterior apical base width (inferior)
Distance 17-18
Anterior apical base width (superior)
Distance 21-22
Anterior midpalatal suture width
Alveolar
Distance 3-4
Posterior width at alveolar crest level
Distance 19-20
Anterior width at midalveolar level
Dental
Distance 7-8
Intermolar width at occlusal surface
Distance 9-10
Intermolar width at palatal root apices
T2
Change
Mean (mm)
SE (mm)
Mean (mm)
SE (mm)
Mean (mm)
SE (mm)
59.48
0.92
62.58
0.92
3.10
0.17
\0.0001*
00.00
0.12
03.14
0.12
3.14
0.14
\0.0001*
37.75
0.87
41.42
0.87
3.66
0.34
\0.0001*
38.22
1.19
41.22
1.19
3.00
0.35
\0.0001*
00.00
0.16
04.37
0.16
4.37
0.20
\0.0001*
51.34
0.73
57.15
0.73
5.80
0.28
\0.0001*
39.58
0.83
44.34
0.83
4.76
0.34
\0.0001*
43.60
0.62
51.50
0.62
7.90
0.23
\0.0001*
29.24
0.75
32.38
0.75
3.14
0.21
\0.0001*
(distance 11-12) (Table V). This sutural orthopedic separation accounted for 54.7% and 39.2% of the total
expansion (8 mm) at distances 21-22 and 11-12,
Weissheimer et al
374
Table VI. Comparison between the changes in the maxillary transverse planes in the groups
Variable
Skeletal
Distance 5-6 (mm)
Posterior apical base width
Distance 11-12 (mm)
Posterior midpalatal suture width
Distance 15-16 (mm)
Anterior apical base width (inferior)
Distance 17-18 (mm)
Anterior apical base width (superior)
Distance 21-22 (mm)
Anterior midpalatal suture width
Alveolar
Distance 3-4 (mm)
Posterior width at alveolar crest level
Distance 19-20 (mm)
Anterior width at midalveolar level
Dental
Distance 7-8 (mm)
Intermolar width at occlusal surface
Distance 9-10 (mm)
Intermolar width at palatal root apices
Angle 1MD ( )
Right rst molar angulation
Angle 1ME ( )
Left rst molar angulation
Haas group
Hyrax group
T2-T1
T2-T1
Mean
SE
Mean
SE
2.19
0.15
3.10
0.17
0.0002*
2.62
0.12
3.14
0.14
0.010*
3.29
0.30
3.66
0.34
0.427
2.62
0.31
3.00
0.35
0.438
3.63
0.17
4.37
0.20
0.007*
5.44
0.25
5.80
0.28
0.342
4.03
0.30
4.76
0.34
0.119
7.70
0.20
7.90
0.23
0.526
2.15
0.18
3.14
0.21
0.0008*
8.25
0.98
6.80
1.11
0.334
6.14
0.90
6.19
1.02
0.975
Weissheimer et al
375
1.
2.
3.
RME produced signicant increases in all maxillary transverse dimensions. The expansion pattern
was triangular, with smaller effects at the skeletal
level than at the dental level. However, the pure
skeletal expansion was greater than actual dental
expansion. The sutural expansion showed a wedge
shape with the wide base in the anterior maxilla.
The opening of the midpalatal suture accounted
for 50% of the total expansion (8 mm) in the
anterior region and 36% in the posterior region
(there was a decrease from anterior to posterior).
The hyrax-type expander produced greater orthopedic effects in 3 of the 5 skeletal points measured
compared with the Haas-type expander. However,
the effects were less than 0.5 mm per side and might
not be clinically signicant.
REFERENCES
1. Angell EH. Treatment of irregularities of the permanent or adult
tooth. Dent Cosmos 1860:540-4, 599-601.
2. Haas AJ. Rapid expansion of the maxillary dental arch and nasal cavity by opening the midpalatal suture. Angle Orthod 1961;31:73-90.
3. Haas AJ. The treatment of maxillary deciency by opening the
midpalatal suture. Angle Orthod 1965;35:200-17.
4. Haas AJ. Palatal expansion: just the beginning of dentofacial
orthopedics. Am J Orthod 1970;57:219-55.
5. Haas AJ. Long-term posttreatment evaluation of rapid maxillary
expansion. Angle Orthod 1980;50:189-217.
6. Biederman W. A hygienic appliance for rapid expansion. J Clin
Orthod 1968;2:67-70.
7. Siqueira D, Almeida R, Henriques J. Frontal cephalometric comparative study of dentoskeletal effects produced by three types of maxillary expanders. Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortop Facial 2002;7:
27-47.
8. Chung CH, Font B. Skeletal and dental changes in the sagittal,
vertical, and transverse dimensions after rapid palatal expansion.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:569-75.
9. Sandikciolu M, Hazar S. Skeletal and dental changes after maxillary
expansion in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1997;111:321-7.
10. Timms DJ, Preston CB, Daly PF. A computed tomographic assessment of maxillary movement induced by rapid expansiona pilot
study. Eur J Orthod 1982;4:123-7.
11. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of
cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent
Assoc 2006;72:75-80.
12. Lagravere MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, Major PW. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on
cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:112-6.
13. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Tinazzi Martini P, Bergamo
Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based
on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998;
8:1558-64.
14. Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear
temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:803-11.
Weissheimer et al
376
15. Misch KA, Yi ES, Sarment DP. Accuracy of cone beam computed
tomography for periodontal defect measurements. J Periodontol
2006;77:1261-6.
16. Nakajima A, Sameshima GT, Arai Y, Homme Y, Shimizu N,
Dougherty H Sr. Two- and three-dimensional orthodontic imaging
using limited cone beam-computed tomography. Angle Orthod
2005;75:895-903.
17. Walker L, Enciso R, Mah J. Three-dimensional localization of
maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:418-23.
18. Hamada Y, Kondoh T, Noguchi K. Application of limited cone
beam computed tomography to clinical assessment of alveolar
bone grafting: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J
2005;42:128-37.
19. Poggio PM, Incorvati C, Velo S, Carano A. Safe zones: a guide for
miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Angle
Orthod 2006;76:191-7.
20. Garrett BJ, Caruso JM, Rungcharassaeng K, Farrage JR, Kim JS,
Taylor GD. Skeletal effects to the maxilla after rapid maxillary
expansion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Am
J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:8.e1-11.
21. Broadbent BH. A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1:45-66.
22. Sandikciolu M, Hazar S. Skeletal and dental changes after maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 1997;111:321-7.
23. Ahlqvist J, Eliasson S, Welander U. The effect of projection errors
on cephalometric length measurements. Eur J Orthod 1986;8:
141-8.
24. Ahlqvist J, Eliasson S, Welander U. The effect of projection errors
on angular measurements in cephalometry. Eur J Orthod 1988;
10:353-61.
25. Hatcher DC, Aboudara CL. Diagnosis goes digital. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:512-5.
26. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:106-14.
27. Garib DG, Henriques JF, Janson G, de Freitas MR, Fernandes AY.
Periodontal effects of rapid maxillary expansion with
tooth-tissue-borne and tooth-borne expanders: a computed
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.