SHALE GAS,

THE FUTURE - UNCONVENTIONAL GAS

by :
Doddy Priambodo
Wuryadi Sadirsan
Jakarta. Oktober 2012

\\
EP

CURRICULUM VITAE
Nama
: Doddy Priambodo
Tempat tgl lahir : 11 April 1961
________________________

Nma
: Wuryadi Sadirsan
Tempat tgl lahir : 22 Januari 1959
________________________

Pendidikan : Geologi UGM

Geologi ITB
_________________________

Pendidikan : Geologi ITB

Geologi ITB
_________________________

Pengalaman Kerja :
1989 s/d saat ini : PT PERTAMINA
Jabatan Saat ini : Direktur Eksplorasi
.
&.Pengembangan
.
PT PERTAMINA EP

Pengalaman Kerja :
1989 s/d saat ini : PT PERTAMINA
Jabatan Saat ini : Manajer Regional .
.
PT PERTAMINA EP

EP

UNCONVENTIONAL GAS

EP

ROAD MAP PT Pertamina (Persero) MENUJU WORLD CLASS COMPANY

Unconventional HC Resources
1000 md

10 md

0,1 md

0,01 md

Source: Unconventional Reservoirs (Holditch et.al, 2001)

EP

Crude Supply-Demand Profile in Indonesia

Indonesia becomes net
crude importer

1800
1600
1400

mbopd

1200
1000
800

600
400
200
0
1995

1997 1999 2001 2003

Oil Production (mbopd)

2005 2007 2009 2011 2013

Oil consumption (mbopd)

2015

EP

Central & East Java Demand

Will Be Triple By 2019
North Sumatra Demand
Will Be Quadruple By 2019
EP

PERTUMBUHAN JUMLAH KENDARAAN DI

INDONESIA
(Data BPS 2006-2010 Mobil penumpang, bis, truk, dan sepeda motor)

DATA GAIKINDO dan AISI:

Jumlah kendaraan di Indonesia No. 1 di ASEAN
(Thailand 25,29 juta, Vietnam 14,51 juta, Malaysia 7,28 juta, serta Filipina 2,15 juta)
Pertumbuhan Kendaraan bermotor 10-15% per tahun
Pada 2014 diprediksi penjualan kendaraan bermotor mencapai 1 juta unit

EP

EP

Characteristics of Shale Gas Plays

Characteristics
Well bounded and contains hydraulic fracture energy;
Brittle;
Moderate clay content (< 40 percent)

Specific Measures:
Characteristic
Unit of Measurement

Target

Explanation

Maturity

Ro (%)

1.1 to 1.4

Vitrinite Reflectance

Thickness

ft / m

> 100 / 30.5

TOC

>3%

Gas content

Scf / ton

> 50

Preferably > 100

Porosity
%
>3
Preferably > 5
Source: Halliburton Website; /www.halliburton.com/public/news/source_files/Newsletters/KCNews/2006/Jan06PE_Shale_print.html

EP

EP

Shale Gas Parameters

COMMON CHARACTERISTICS AMONG GAS SHALES
High Gamma Ray

High Resistivity
High organic content (>1%)
High maturity (late oil window or higher), Ro > 1%
Brittleness (>40% Qz. content)

Thickness (> 30 ft)

Porosity (>4%)
Deposited in marine environments
Type II kerogen
Presence of fracture barriers (usually carbonates)
Low permeability (in nano darcy scale)

EP

POTENTIAL IN USA
&
IN PERTAMINA EP

EP

U.S. Gas Shale Plays

Green River Shale
Green River Basin

Gammon Shale
Williston Basin

Bakken Shale
Williston Basin

Excello/Mulky Shales
Cherokee Basin

Niobrara/Pierre Shales
Denver Basin

Mancos & Lewis Shales

Uinta & Piceance Basin

Antrim Shale
Michigan Basin

Cane Creek Shale

Paradox Basin
Devonian/Ohio Shales
Appalachian Basin
McClure Shale
San Joaquin Basin
New Albany Shale
Illinois Basin

Monterey Shale
Various Basins

Floyd/Conasauga Shales
Black Warrior Basin

Mancos/Lewis Shales
San Juan Basin

Palo Duro/Cisco/Bend
Shales
Palo Duro Basin
Barnett/Woodford Shales
Delaware Basin

Barnett Shale
Fort Worth
Basin

Woodford
Shale
Anadarko
Basin

Caney/Woodford/
Fayetteville Shales
Arkoma Basin

Haynesville Shale
East Texas Basin

EP

GAS SHALE BASIN

Basin Area, SqM (est)
Depth, ft
Net Thickness, ft
TOC, %
Total Porosity, %
Thermal Maturity, Ro
IP Rates, MMCFD
Avg. Lateral Length, ft
Well Spacing, Acres*
Proj.OGIP, TCF (Bsn)
Expected RF, % (Bsn)
Rec. Resources, TCF

BARNETT
54,000
6,5008,500
100 600
4.5
4 5
2.2
4
2,500 3,500
60 160
327
20 50
44

FAYETTEVILLE
9,000
1,000 7,000
20 200
4 9.8
2 8
1.5 4.0
2.8
1,500 5,000
80 160
52
30
42

HAYNESVILLE
9,000
10,50013,500
200 300
0.5 4
89
1.0 2.5
14
3,500 3,800
40 560
717
30
251

MARCELLUS

WOOD FORD

EAGLE FORD

95,000
4,0008,500
50 200
3 12
10
1.1 3.0
5
2,500
40 160
1,500
20 40
2 62

11,000
6,00011,000
120 220
1 14
3 9
1.0 1.2
4.5
2,500 5,000
640
23
50+
11

3,800
0,50011,300
300 475
35
7 10
7
9 + Cond
3,800 - 5,500

21

Averages depends on Lateral Length, Frac & Reservoir Characteristics

EP

Shale gas production

EP

EP

EP

Break even point

EP

Asset Overview Shale Gas Parameter

Comparison data of Shale Gas in US and Purpose WK Pertamina

3.51 21.17

9.33-16.96

EP

Gas Shale Rankings vs Initial Production

Vertical Wells
3500

Initial Production (MCFD)

Barnett
3000
2500

Haynesville
2000

Woodford

1500

Woodford

Caney

1000
500

Marcellus

0
40

50

60

70

80

90

Gas Shale Score Ranking

EP

EP

EP

EP

Major Source Rock Type of

The Hydrocarbon Productive Basin of Indonesia

EP

EP

Quartz + Feldspar

North Sumatra Basin

Jambi subbasin
Palembang subbasin
North West Jawa Basin
BaritoBasin
KutaiBasin
Salawati Basin

Clay

Carbonate

EP

Asset Overview Location Map

TOTAL AREA = 6.257 km
(NW) WK = 4.392 km
(SE) WK = 1.865 km

Intres area of L Baong FM.

ADMINISTRATIVE MAP OF
SHALE GAS NAD

Intres area of Bampo FM.

2720 sq km
LEGEND :

1672 sq km

River
District Border
City/Town

3537 sq km

Sub District
WK Block Existing PEP

1865 sq km

OUTCROP OF OLD SEDIMENT

AND BASEMENT
INDEX MAP

EP

PERTAMINA STRATEGY

HC
BASE

CBM
Shale Gas/oil

(Unconventional)

PERIOD

Non HC
BASE

2010 - 2013

Geothermal

CBM
Shale Gas/oil
Tight Sand Gas ??

CBM
Shale Gas/oil
Tight Sand Gas ??
Oil / Gas Sand

CBM
Shale Gas/oil
Tight Sand Gas ??
Oil /Gas Sand
Coal-Synthetic Gas

2014 - 2017

2018- 2021

2022 - 2025

Geothermal
Wind
Algae

Geothermal
Wind
Algae
Solar cell
Nuclear

Geothermal
Wind
Algae
Solar cell
Nuclear
Hydrogen

NATIONAL
ENERGY
COMPANY

PERTAMINAS BLUE PRINT OF

NEW AND RENEWABLE ENERGY (NRE)

EP

CONSTRAINs

EP

Comparison data of Shale Gas in USA

3.51 21.17

9.33-16.96

EP

PROBABILITY GEOLOGICAL SUCCESS FOR SHALE GAS

MODIFIED FROM JAVIER AND OTIS

PARAMETER TEMPLATE

F. Baong F Bampo
Aru Langkat North Sumatra

Lacustrine - marine
18 -98 ft
396 1,398
0.56 1.96

18.5 -91.7

1 -9

6,500 10,000

EP

GAS SHALE PRODUCTION

EP

EP

EP

EP

POSITIVE VALUE

EP

LOKASI KEGIATAN OIL/GAS SHALE

PUSAT SUMBER DAYA GEOLOGI

EP

Dst -5 Sumur Pagardewa 5

di lapisan shale F Gumai
kedalam 1400 m

EP

Gas production

Unconventional gas
EP

EP

Conclusion
1. Shale gas is unconventional gas, high price and high
technology.
2. Potential in Pertamina EP is different of age, facies and
brittleness from those in USA
3. Constrain in Shale Gas development is number of wells,
horizontal wells and water treatment.
4. The positive value of Shale Gas is abundant, and
promising.
5. Pertamina will expoit gas shale to support national
energy stability after economics is achieved
6. Government support is needed in incentive land
clearance, customs tax, social effect.
EP

Exploration : the biggest gamble in oil & gas business

EP

EP

EP

EP

Thank you

EP