Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Chemosphere
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere
Review
h i g h l i g h t s
We summarized the role of many signicant parameters during FW composting processes.
Key ingredients affecting FW composting performance were analyzed.
Representative mathematical models for simulating FW composting processes were discussed.
Instructive perspects were provided at the end of this article.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 12 January 2013
Received in revised form 21 June 2013
Accepted 24 June 2013
Available online 20 July 2013
Keywords:
Review
Food waste
Composting
Simulation
a b s t r a c t
Composting has been used as a method to dispose food waste (FW) and recycle organic matter to improve
soil structure and fertility. Considering the signicance of composting in FW treatment, many researchers
have paid their attention on how to improve FW composting efciency, reduce operating cost, and mitigate the associated environmental damage. This review focuses on the overall studies of FW composting,
not only various parameters signicantly affecting the processes and nal results, but also a number of
simulation approaches that are greatly instrumental in well understanding the process mechanism
and/or results prediction. Implications of many key ingredients on FW composting performance are also
discussed. Perspects of effective laboratory experiments and computer-based simulation are nally
investigated, demonstrating many demanding areas for enhanced research efforts, which include the
screening of multi-functional additives, volatile organiccompound emission control, necessity of modeling and post-modeling analysis, and usefulness of developing more conjunctive AI-based process control
techniques.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Role of environmental parameters during FW composting processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1.
Temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2.
pH level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3.
MC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.4.
C/N ratio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.5.
Aeration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Implications of key ingredients on FW composting performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.
Starting culture and additives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.
N transfer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.
Exhaust gas emission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Modeling of FW composting processes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.1.
Mechanism models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.
Statistical approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1248
1248
1248
1249
1250
1250
1250
1251
1251
1252
1252
1253
1253
1253
Corresponding author at: Sino-Canada Resources and Environmental Research Academy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, PR China. Tel.: +86 10
6177 2939; fax: +86 010 6177 2978.
E-mail address: luhw@ncepu.edu.cn (H. Lu).
0045-6535/$ - see front matter 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.064
1248
5.
6.
Discussions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Future research needs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1.
Experimental efforts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1.1.
Screening of multi-functional additives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1.2.
VOC emission control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.2.
Simulation approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.2.1.
Process simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.2.2.
Parameter uncertainty and relationship nonlinearity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.3.
Process control and quality control techniques. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.
1. Introduction
Composting is a biochemical process converting various components in organic waste into relatively stable humus-like substances
that can be used as a soil amendment or organic fertilizer (Tiquia,
2010; Coelho et al., 2011; Lashermes et al., 2012). As an alternative
waste disposal method, composting can divert waste from landll,
mitigate groundwater contamination, reduce air pollution and
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and generate useful products
(Cekmecelioglu et al., 2005; Adhikari et al., 2008; He et al.,
2011a). Therefore, the studies related to composting processes
have attracted more attentions of many researchers (He et al.,
2009; Iqbal et al., 2010; Kumar et al.,2010).
During composting processes, the precise chemical changes and
complex metabolic processes of various microorganisms vary with
the composition of composting materials (Chang and Hsu, 2008).
Even in a certain composting process, the entire system would also
change dynamically to reect the variation of environmental factors
(Lin et al., 2008a). Therefore, the individual properties of particular
waste materials may have their special characters during composting, though the principles of composting for different kinds of waste
are mostly the same. In recent years, FW has been increasingly produced by daily life due to the rapid growth of population and economic development (Smrs et al., 2002; Lin, 2008; Gonzales et al.,
2010). Compared with other organic waste, FW has many special
physical and chemical characteristics, such as high organic content,
high organic-to-ash ratio, loose physical structure, high salt and oil
content, high nitrogen content, and low C/N ratio (Chang and Hsu,
2008; Kumar et al., 2010). Being the heaviest component of municipal waste stream after recyclables are removed, FW has high moisture content (MC) and is very dense (Adhikari et al., 2008; Kim et al.,
2008; Chang and Chen, 2010). It often contains high concentrations
of easily degradable organic substances such as sugars, starches, lipids and proteins, and is suitable to be disposed by composting.
Although composting is not a new solid waste disposal method,
the characteristics of FW still offer a unique challenge to the
researchers, since the basic knowledge of FW composting is inadequate for supporting successful processes with high efciency (Lei
and Vander Gheynst, 2000). Therefore, FW composting has gained
particular attention in the past decade (Cekmecelioglu et al.,
2005; Chang et al., 2005; Adhikari et al., 2008; Chang and Hsu,
2008; Kim et al., 2008; Kumar et al., 2009; Chang and Chen, 2010).
This paper will review the previous research on the overall FW
composting processes. As a vast number of literatures in such a
eld exist, it is not our intention to provide a complete discussion
of all these studies. Instead, we will focus on the most representative works, and discuss signicant challenges. The paper will be
structured as follows: (1) role of environmental parameters during
FW composting processes, (2) implications of key ingredients on
composting performance, (3) simulation models of FW composting
processes, (4) discussions, and (5) future research needs.
1254
1255
1255
1255
1255
1255
1255
1255
1255
1255
1256
1256
1249
Resource
C/N ratio
Moisture content
(%)
Initial
pH
Initial temperature
(C)
Bulking agent
References
FW
N/A
6790
55.4
4750
1721
6164
4.25.0
2535
FW
MSWa
FW
FW
FW
FW
2632
2530
1256.6
25
32
1532
61.362.2
5560
55
80
63
5565
62.866.3
N/A
2530
N/A
37
25
Cekmecelioglu et al.
(2005)
Chikae et al. (2006)
Komilis et al. (2004)
Chang and Hsu (2008)
Kim et al. (2008)
Lin (2008)
Sun et al. (2009)
FW
Synthetic
19.5
21.5
63.5
5.45.6
N/A
4
4.4
5.2
5.76
6.29
6.03
1921
Leaves
FW
Synthetic
21.5
39.2
25.7
1925
8.85
26
71.479.8
N/A
2530
Rice husk,
sawdust, rice bran
FW
LRFV
MSW
FW
MSW
a
b
c
Synthetic
Bazaar
Restaurant
Composting plant
74.47
N/A
7080
60
6.5
4.95.2
3.865
7.13
30
N/A
2545
N/A
PW
Sawdust and peanut shell
Rice husk
Dry grass
Table 2
Characteristics of temperature variation and composting scales of some FW
composting experiments.
Reference
Composting
Reach
Highest
Initial
temperature temperature highest scale
time
(C)
(C)
(d)
4750
2535
4750
61.3
N/A
30
Bench scale
Pilot-scale
65.166.3
62.865.0
2530
N/A
37
1921
2530
30
2545
71.1
65
57
6768
7577
6870
60
6870
75.2
32
1
N/A
1213
1314
1314
N/A
40
3.5
Pilot-scale
Pilot-scale
Bench scale
Pilot-scale
Pilot-scale
Bench scale
Bench scale
Bench scale
Bench scale
(TOCs) decreased sharply when the temperature reached the thermophilic level. Guo et al. (2012) designed a series of experiments
that reached the thermophilic phase (>50 C) within the rst
12 d, due to the metabolism of psychrophilic and mesophilic
microbes; it remained above 50 C for a long time and a lower
temperature would lead to a higher electrical conductivity (EC), a
slower organic matter (OM) degradation rate, and a lower N
content in the cooling phase.
An appropriate temperature and thermophilic phase are necessary for FW composting. Many previous studies attempted to use
quick external heating equipments, but seldom obtained satisfactory results. This is because the rapid temperature increase by
external heating might not be benecial for microorganism
growth. Different responses of microorganism to the changing
temperature can dramatically affect the performance of FW
composting. In a typical self-heated FW composting process, temperature is gently increased along with the microbiological activity
of aerobic microorganism; it then drops under anaerobic environment when the pH reaches a certain level. Mesophilic microbes
thus obtain a more suitable growing temperature, and nally
mature the remaining OM in a short period. In general, the self-
2.2. pH level
During FW composting processes, short-chain organic acids are
generated from the feedstock since the initial phase of batch composting (Beck-Friis et al., 2001). The short-chain organic acids and
ammonia appear to contribute mostly to the pH variation, which is
often within a range of 4.98.3 (Conghos et al., 2003). The generated numerous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semi-VOCs
during composting (e.g. acids and alcohols) signicantly decrease
the microbial activity (Komilis et al., 2004), and increasing such
activity levels through adjusting pH becomes an efcient way to
enhance composting performance (Smrs et al., 2002; Sasaki
et al., 2003; Komilis et al., 2004; Yu and Huang, 2009). A low pH
value may inhibit microbial activity, and sometimes severely hampers the progress of composting reaction (Beck-Friis et al., 2001);
in comparison, a high pH value may also have inhibitory effects
on the activities of microorganisms.
Both high and low pH levels can cause adverse effect on FW
composting processes. Nakasaki et al. (1993) tested liming of garbage composting (from meal supply service industry) in order to
prevent the pH level from dropping below 7, especially at the early
stage in a laboratory-scale reactor under well-controlled experimental conditions. They found that the degradation rate of OM in
the pH-controlled experiment was faster than that in the experiment without pH control. They also tested the pH dependency of
microbial activities using a liquid medium of proteins and glucose,
and found an optimum pH range of 78 for FW composting. Beck-
1250
2008; Chang and Chen, 2010). Recently, the researchers have found
that sound composting reactions can also be expected when the C/
N ratios were lower than 25 (Huang et al., 2004; Zhu, 2007; Kumar
et al., 2010). Huang et al. (2004) compared composting processes
with C/N ratios being 30 and 15. The results showed that composting with a low initial C/N ratio could reduce the amount of bulking
agent (BA) used, but require a longer composting period. Zhu
(2007) conducted two pilot-composting experiments with initial
C/N ratios of 20 and 25, respectively. It was found that the lower
initial C/N ratio would reduce 172 kg rice straw t 1 fresh swine
manure than the higher one but nitrogen loss was higher, and
the maturity time would be postponed. Kumar et al. (2010) investigated co-composting of FW and green waste at low initial C/N ratios, and found that the substrate at a higher C/N ratio (i.e. 19.6)
can be decomposed effectively to reduce 33% of total volatile solids
in 12 d; optimal operating C/N ratios in the range of 13.919.6 with
MCs being in the range of 4575% were also identied.
2.5. Aeration
As a signicant factor in FW composting systems, aeration is
important to both microbial growth and gas emission (Chang
et al., 2005; Lin, 2008; Iqbal et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2011; Guo
et al., 2012). The aeration rate intensely affects microbial activity,
substrate degradation rate, and temperature variation in FW composting processes (Rasapoor et al., 2009; Gao et al., 2010). It was
also found that low and medium aeration rates led to an increase
in percentage of total nitrogen (TN), sharp decrease of C/N ratio
and long time of thermophilic phase, while high aeration rates
led to greater EC values corresponding to the compost manure
(Rasapoor et al. 2009). How to determine an optimal amount of
aeration for various composting processes has been widely studied
to make the processes more efcient (Barrington et al., 2003; De
Guardia et al., 2008; Gao et al., 2010; Guo et al., 2012).
Different aeration rates have been identied for various composting processes by means of experimental practices (Lin et al.,
2008a; Rasapoor et al., 2009). Lu et al. (2001) used an aeration rate
of 0.433.44 L min 1 kg 1 OM for a FW composting process. The
results indicated that ow rate of enforced aeration indeed inuenced the composting performance, and the composting under
0.430.86 L min 1 kg 1 OM condition seemed better than that
under 1.723.44 L min 1 kg 1 OM. Seo et al. (2004) supplied air
periodically with airow of 5 L min 1 10 min in every hour, and
the weight loss of FW after the composting was very high (i.e.
71%). Lin (2008) also aerated the reactor continuously with vacuum at 0.67 L min 1 kg 1 OM, and found that the process was easy
to operate and control without NH3 odor to achieve superior nal
product in a short composting time. Kim et al. (2008) studied a
pilot-scale in-vessel FW composting, using forced aeration at an
aeration rate of 0.190.38 L min 1 kg 1 OM. It was found that the
highest CO2 concentration and lowest O2 concentration were monitored on day 12, and high temperature was observed during the
entire composting process. This demonstrated that the aeration
of this composting system had provided enough air to aerobically
degrade the substrates. Yu and Huang (2009) mixed FW with
leaves and garden soil through a perforated plate, and used a ow
rate of 0.3 L min 1 kg 1 OM during the entire process. This ow
rate not only provided enough air but also maintained appropriate
temperature for composting. Chang and Chen (2010) used an
aeration rate of 0.72 L min 1 kg 1 OM for FW composting through
an induced fan, and the highest temperature was detected at 47
60 C. Kumar et al. (2010) studied about co-composting of FW
and green waste with an aeration rate of 1 L min 1 kg 1 OM. The
results showed that 99.2% relative seed germinated and the calculated value of germination index was close to the suggested value
(60%). Through the above research, it can be found that almost all
1251
Dimension of reactor/
pill (L)
Aeration system
Aeration rate
(L min 1 kg 1 OM)
Nitrogen in nal
compost (%)
EC in nal compost
(dS m 1)
Lu et al. (2001)
Seo et al. (2004)
1.5
206.15
0.430.86
N/A
0.51.9
7.33
3.821
N/A
N/A
N/A
324,000
3825
0.190.38
0.67
1.89
1.6
18
20
N/A
2.87
Rasapoor et al.
(2009)
Yu and Huang
(2009)
Chang and Chen
(2010)
Kumar et al.
(2010)
Guo et al. (2012)
28,800
Enforced aeration
Negative pressure
aeration
Forced aeration
Negative pressure
aeration
N/A
0.40.9
1.11.4
623
10.512.4
31.8
Enforced aeration
0.31
N/A
N/A
N/A
180
0.72
0.871.59
32.751.5
N/A
120
Negative pressure
aeration
Enforced aeration
1.01
N/A
N/A
N/A
60
Enforced aeration
0.240.72
2.02.8
10.816.2
N/A
teristics of FW, additives often have to be added to the initial materials to speed up the reaction and dilute hazardous substances in
the mixture (Seo et al., 2004). The most commonly used additive
is known as BA. Table 5 shows the chemical and physical characteristics of some widely used BAs. They can not only control pH,
but also change physical property (MC, carbon content, porosity,
C/N ratio and so on) of the feedstock (Cekmecelioglu et al., 2005;
Adhikari et al., 2008; Iqbal et al., 2010). In FW composting, BAs
are often added to adjust MC, pH and C/N ratio, and enlarge FAS
(Adhikari et al., 2008; Chang and Chen, 2010; Iqbal et al., 2010; Kumar et al., 2010).
For example, Sartaj et al. (1997) used peat to absorb excess
water from slurry waste to generate solid matrix mixture that
can compost easily under passive aeration condition. Adhikari
et al. (2008) compared the effectiveness of three kinds of BAs
and found that chopped wheat straw and chopped hay could offer
the best performance; in comparison, wood shavings and wasted
animal feed were lack of structural stability after absorbing moisture, and cardboards had a low water absorption capacity.
Most of BAs were used to ght against the organic acids produced during the early composting stages and thus helped maintain pH levels of the mixture within a range from 6 to 8 (Haug,
1993). Some studies used sodium salt solution (NaOH and NaAC)
in the initial phase of FW composting to control pH levels, and
found that NaAC could bring high microbial activity (Lei and Vander Gheynst, 2000; Yu and Huang, 2009). Caustic lime was also
considered as an amendment to adjust the pH levels, particularly
for acid FW composting (Sasaki et al., 2003; Adhikari et al.,
2008). Comparison between urea and caustic lime as nitrogen
source to the feedstock was also studied, and the run adding caustic lime and ammonium sulfate showed greater degradation efciency than that with urea added (Sasaki et al. 2003).
In some cases, BAs were added to adjust C/N ratios of initial
substrates (Adhikari et al., 2008; Iqbal et al., 2010; Kumar et al.,
2010; Jiang et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2012). Rice husk, NH4NO3, sawdust, rice bran, cornstalks and some other materials were used as
BAs, in order to deal with the variation of FW production rate
and substrate nature arising from seasonal change, to speed up
the reaction, or to obtain an optimal operating condition (Adhikari
et al., 2008; Chang and Chen, 2010; Kumar et al., 2010). It was also
proved that a well-controlled low C/N ratio through adding BAs
was feasible for FW composting (Jiang et al., 2011).
People often chose BAs from inexpensive waste materials that
are readily available, with little consideration of what type and
shape are used, though more BAs may provide more FAS (Iqbal
et al., 2010). Various types of BAs were selected and used in the
previous composting studies corresponding to different properties
1252
Table 4
Comparison between positive- and negative-pressures aeration systems for FW composting.
Negative pressure
Positive pressure
Air sources
Gas emission
Bottom to top
Surface to inside
Collected directly
Extra collecting equipment
Lower FAS
Lower MC
Table 5
Chemical and physics characteristics of some bulking agents used in FW composting experiments.
a
b
Materials
pH
DM (%)
N (% dwb)
C (% dwb)
BDa (kg m
Sawdust
Wheat straw
Chopped hay
Chopped wheat straw
Wood shaving
N/A
Sawdust
Pruning wastes
Sawdust
Rice husk
Branches
Corn stalks
5.55
6.3
6.6
7.0
5.9
7.3
4.2
N/A
N/A
7.17.3
N/A
N/A
92
86.9
90.8
88.9
85.0
90
88
74.4
88
8992
87.3
87.5
0.22
0.98
0.89
0.50
0.08
1.9
0.8
1.53
0.20.4
1.22
0.79
0.39
46.5
49.8
51.65
50.38
54.18
57
46.4
40
4346
41.66
48.3
48.0
N/A
N/A
169b
127b
211b
240
N/A
N/A
190210
N/A
N/A
N/A
C/N ratio
References
211
50.8
58
101
677
30
58
25.9
140160
34.17
61.1
123.1
Bulking density.
Manually compressed bulk densities.
3.2. N transfer
Compost has long been used as soil amendment and organic
fertilizer (Carbonell et al., 2011; He et al., 2011b; Marchal et al.,
2013). The transformation of nitrogen in composting materials is
one of the most important factors that affect compost quality
(Ekinci et al., 2000; Beck-Friis et al., 2001; Jeong and Kim, 2001;
Cayuela et al., 2012). Nitrogen-related reactions in composting
processes are complex, but the principal procedures governing
the formation of nitrogen species can all be categorized into min-
and N2O emissions but increased CH4 losses, while turning decreased N2O and CH4 losses, but enlarged NH3 losses. The results
showed that turning twice weekly with as little as possible covering
would result in maturation with the lowest GHG emission.
During composting processes, VOCs are potential air pollutants,
due totheir malodorous and hazardous properties as well as considerable contribution to global warming, stratospheric ozone depletion and tropospheric ozone formation (Kleinman, 2005). In
general, VOCs (or semi-VOCs) appear to be embedded in the solid
matrix and released at the initial wetting and heating processes
(Komilis et al., 2004). For FW composting, however, studies related
to the VOC emissions were seldom reported. Komilis et al. (2004)
investigated the VOC emissions in a FW composting process and
found that approximately 0.332.5 mg kg 1 dry matter of VOCs
and semi-VOCs were generated. The environmental problem
caused by the presence of VOCs in gaseous streams is due to their
toxicity and bad odor. Many researchers studied the approaches
to reduce VOC emissions fromcomposting facilities (Komilis et al.,
2004; Pagans et al., 2007; Turan et al., 2009). Pagans et al. (2007)
used compost biolter to remove VOCs from the exhaust gases during an organic waste composting process, and found that the maximum VOC removal efciency was 82% when the biolter worked at
a loading rate range of 0.5528.8 g C m 3 biolter h 1. Turan et al.
(2009) identied the highest VOC removal efciency of 88% for a
poultry litter composting process with pumice addition.
The emission rates of CO2 and NH3 indicate the decomposition
of OM. During FW composting processes, the rst peak of CO2 andNH3 emissions occurs when the temperature reaches a high level.
It indicates that CO2 and NH3 emissions are correlated with temperature. The high NH3 emission rate arises from the decomposition of nitrogen-containing OM, which relates to microbiological
activity. Thus the NH3 emission is inuenced by microbiological
activity and temperature. FW often has high nitrogen content
and leads to NH3 emissions during composting processes, and pollutes ambient environment. As the emitted NH 3 can be traced not
only in off-gas but also in the condensate of composting products,
it may be a feasible option of using cool and moisture-rich condensates to collect the compost off-gas, and then the condensate can
be disposed.
1253
1254
Nakasaki et al., 1987), polynomial (Van Lier et al., 1994), exponential (Vander Gheynst et al., 1997) and statistical expressions (Seki,
2000). They often utilized oxygen consumption data (Vander Gheynst et al., 1997), carbon dioxide generation data (Nakasaki et al.,
1987) or total solids degradation data (van Lier et al., 1994).
Kishimoto et al. (1987) reported an empirical model in which biological heat generation was expressed in terms of temperature, MC,
cumulative energy and airow rate. Vander Gheynst et al. (1997)
proposed a model that incorporated a power law relationship;
the model was then tted to O2 consumption rates from the composting of dog food substrate over a period of 35 h.
Some researchers believed that there were a variety of uncertainties arising from incomplete or imprecise information exiting
in real-world FW composting systems (Qin et al., 2007; Comas
et al., 2008; Xi et al., 2008). Many mathematical approaches that
were able to address such uncertainties were thus proposed in
the past decades (Liang et al., 2003b; Tang et al., 2006; Zhang
et al., 2008; Lu et al., 2009; Kumar et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2009;
Giusti and Marsili-Libelli, 2010; Sun et al., 2011). As a valuable tool
in facilitating the analysis of systems with uncertainties derived
from vagueness or fuzziness, fuzzy sets theory has been incorporated when simulating FW composting processes under uncertainty (Qin et al., 2007; Comas et al., 2008; Xi et al., 2008; Zhang
et al., 2008; Kumar et al., 2009;Giusti and Marsili-Libelli, 2010).
It can be used to facilitate the managers determining whether uctuations of the composting performance were because of unavoidable system uncertainties or human-induced factors during FW
composting process (Qin et al., 2007). Through integrating fuzzy
vertex andfactorial analysis, the effect of uncertainties in FW composting systems can be systematically characterized (Xi et al.,
2008); the implicit knowledge could be effectively communicated
into composting process modeling and further provided valuable
information for enhancing composting process control under a
variety of uncertainties. Moreover, some researchers used fuzzy
set theory to assess the quality of FW composting products by
advancing a fuzzy version of the principal component analysis
(Zhang et al., 2008) or to predict the maximum in-cycle temperature in the initial part of the composting batch under uncertainty
(Giusti and Marsili-Libelli, 2010).
Recently, several studies employed stochastic approaches to
tackle the random feature of many system components in FW composting. Seki (2000) developed a stochastic model for batch-type
FW composting, wherein the state variables varied stochastically
with each unit increment of concentration; the model was suitable
to predict the expected values and standard deviations of the state
variables at the end of the rst stage of composting processes.
Understanding the relationships between composting state
variables (e.g. surface temperature, ash content, MC, pH) and specic characteristics (e.g. microbial activities, maturity, stability and
so on) is an important step towards providing insightful FW composting operation (Sun et al., 2009). Recently, there has been a
growing interest in using articial intelligence to reect such complicated relationships (Liang et al., 2003b; Tang et al., 2006; Sun
et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2011). Liang et al. (2003b) developed articial neural networks (ANNs) to analyze the relationships between
oxygen uptake rates and state variables including temperature
and MC in FW composting. Tang et al. (2006) combined ANNs with
an enzyme sensor for simultaneous determination of lignin peroxidase secreted by white-rot fungi in composting of agricultural organic solid waste; it was found that the combination of the
amperometric enzyme sensor and ANNs was a rapid, sensitive
and robust method in the quantitative study of composting systems. Sun et al. (2009) developed a stepwise-cluster microbial biomass inference model to tackle the nonlinear relationships among
state variables and microbial activities; the model could help
establish a statistical relationship between state variables and
5. Discussions
In general, FW composting can be conducted in two different
patterns, i.e. in-vessel systems and windrow systems (Cekmecelioglu et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2008; Kumar et al., 2010). Comparison
between the two types of systems is provided in Table 6. The invessel systems need higher initial investment and consume more
energy, but require less space and are much controllable; moreover, the raw materials of in-vessel systems must be pretreated
(for example magnetic separation and trammel screen separation).
The windrow systems often have higher peak temperature and retain for a longer time; however, the problems of too much leaching
and gas emission have not been solved. In terms of real world
application, in-vessel systems are often used to dispose urban
FW due to less environmental pollution and easy use of the nal
product, while windrow systems are popular in countryside
though they may affect the ambient environment and structural
instability has been frequently observed. In recent years, some pilot-scale in-vessel composting systems for FW have been designed
to enhance the applicability of in-vessel systems arising from the
limited capacities (Kim et al., 2008), but more in-depth efforts
are still necessary. Besides, the study about how to improve the
efciency and reduce environmental pollution of windrow systems
also attracts more attentions of the related researchers.
Previously, many researchers have studied the additives for FW
composting in adjusting pH, DM, carbon content, Total Kjeldahl
Nitrogen (TKN), water absorption capacity, and C/N ratio. Wood
shavings and wasted animal feed are found to be acid and wheat
pellets and wasted animal feed lack structural stability after
absorbing moisture. Few studies attempted to use buffer salts for
regulating the pH of composting processes. It was found that using
NaAc as additive could lead to a higher OM degradation rate, enhance ammonia loss and maybe improve the microbial activity;
meanwhile, NaAc was able to counteract the adverse effects of organic acids during the initial stage of FW composting processes.
Modeling of FW composting processes is essential for supporting the prediction of system performance under various operating
conditions and thus quantifying relationships between control actions and process efciencies. A good agreement was found between predicted and experimental results on the evolution of
temperature, oxygen in the exhaust gas, carbon and nitrogen content, and ammonium. However, due to the complex biological and
physicochemical interactions of composting, more systematical efforts are necessary to make the simulation models more universal
and accurate. Deterministic models could obtain spatial averages
of the state variables corresponding to the primary information
about composting processes, but the secondary information such
as variances of the state variables is unavailable, which can be
accomplished by stochastic models.
Some researchers used intelligence algorithms to simulate the
process and predict results of FW composting, and the proposed
models have been successfully applied to tackle the nonlinear relationships in FW composting processes. The state variables used in
the models could be any variables (e.g. pH, MC, ash content, N
content, total C, total N, oxygen concentration and bacterial
counts) measured during composting processes. To ensure good
performance of intelligence algorithms, a careful design of tness
functions to balance the accuracy should be indispensable. A large
number of training and calibrated data would also promote the
1255
In-vessel
systems
Windrow
systems
Initial
cost
Energy
consumption
Raw materials
pretreatment
Space
Peak
temperature
Structure
stability
Real-world
application
High
High
Complex
Solved
Small
Low
Good
Urban
Low
Low
Simple
Not solved
Large
High
Bad
Countryside
accuracy of intelligence algorithms, particularly when they are applied to large-scale composting systems.
7. Conclusions
This review focused on the overall studies of FW composting,
not only various parameters signicantly affecting the processes
and nal results, but also a number of simulation approaches that
were greatly instrumental in well understanding the process
mechanism and/or results prediction. Implications of many key
ingredients on FW composting performance were also discussed.
In general, the characteristics of FW still offered a unique challenge to the researchers, since the basic knowledge of FW composting was inadequate for supporting successful processes with
high efciency. Thus, perspectives of effective laboratory experiments and computer-based simulation were nally investigated,
demonstrating many demanding areas for enhanced research
efforts, including the screening of multi-functional additives, VOC
emission control, necessity of modeling and post-modeling
analysis, and usefulness of developing more conjunctive AI-based
process control techniques.
1256
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (41271540), China National Funds for Excellent Young Scientists (51222906), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China (NCET-11-0632), and
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. The
authors are extremely grateful to the editor and the anonymous
reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.
References
Adhikari, B.K., Barrington, S., Martinez, J., King, S., 2008. Characterization of food
waste and bulking agent for composting. Waste Manage. 28, 795804.
Aslam, D.N., Vander Gheynst, J.S., Rumsey, T.R., 2008. Development of models for
predicting carbon mineralization and associated phytotoxicity in compostamended soil. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 87358741.
Barrington, S., Choinire, D., Trigui, M., Knight, W., 2003. Compost convective
airow under passive aeration. Bioresour. Technol. 86, 259266.
Beck-Friis, B., Smrs, S., Jnsson, H., Kirchmann, H., 2001. Gaseous emissions of
carbon dioxide, ammonia and nitrous oxide from organic household waste in a
compost reactor under different temperature regimes. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 78,
423430.
Carbonell, G., De Imperial, R.M., Torrijos, M., Delgado, M., Rodriguez, J.A., 2011.
Effects of municipal solid waste compost and mineral fertilizer amendments on
soil properties and heavy metals distribution in maize plants (Zea mays L.).
Chemosphere 85, 16141623.
Cayuela, M.L., Snchez-Monedero, M.A., Roig, A., Sinicco, T., Mondini, C., 2012.
Biochemical changes and GHG emissions during composting of lignocellulosic
residues with different N-rich by-products. Chemosphere 88, 196203.
Cekmecelioglu, D., Demirci, A., Graves, R.E., Davitt, N.H., 2005. Applicability of
optimised in-vessel food waste composting for windrow systems. Biosyst. Eng.
91, 479486.
Chang, J.I., Chen, Y.J., 2010. Effect of bulking agents on food waste composting.
Bioresour. Technol. 101, 59175924.
Chang, J.I., Hsu, T.E., 2008. Effect of compositions on food waste composting.
Bioresour. Technol. 99, 80688074.
Chang, J.I., Tsai, J.J., Wu, K.H., 2005. Mathematical model for carbon dioxide
evolution from the thermophilic composting of synthetic food wastes made of
dog food. Waste Manage. 25, 10371045.
Chikae, M., Ikeda, R., Kerman, K., Morita, Y., Tamiya, E., 2006. Estimation of maturity
of compost from food wastes and agro-residues by multiple regression analysis.
Bioresour.Technol. 97, 19791985.
Coelho, C., Cavani, L., Halle, A.T., Guyot, G., Ciavatta, C., Richard, C., 2011. Rates of
production of hydroxyl radical and singlet oxygen from irradiated compost.
Chemosphere 85, 630636.
Coln, J., Martnez-Blanco, J., Gabarrell, X., Artola, A., Snchez, A., Rieradevall, J.,
Font, X., 2010. Environmental assessment of home composting. Resour.
Conserv. Recy. 54, 893904.
Comas, J., Rodrguez-Roda, I., Gernaey, K.V., Rosen, C., Jeppsson, U., Poch, M., 2008.
Risk assessment modeling of microbiology-related solids separation problems
in activated sludge systems. Environ. Modell Softw. 23, 12501261.
Conghos, M.M., Aguirre, M.E., Santamaria, R.M., 2003. Biodegradation of sunower
hulls with different nitrogen sources under mesophilic and thermophilic
incubations. Biol. Fert. Soils 38, 282287.
Crohn, D.M., Valenzuela-Solano, C., 2003. Modeling temperature effects on
decomposition. J. Environ. Eng. 129, 11491156.
Das, K., Keener, H.M., 1997. Numerical model for the dynamic simulation of a large
scale composting system. T. ASAE. 40, 11791189.
De Guardia, A., Petiot, C., Rogeau, D., Druilhe, C., 2008. Inuence of aeration rate on
nitrogen dynamics during composting. Waste Manage. 28, 575587.
Doublet, J., Francou, C., Poitrenaud, M., Houot, S., 2011. Inuence of bulking agents
on organic matter evolution during sewage sludge composting; consequences
on compost organic matter stability and N availability. Bioresour. Technol. 102,
12981307.
Eftoda, G., McCartney, D., 2004. Determining the critical bulking agent requirement
for municipal biosolids composting. Compos. Sci. Util. 12, 208218.
Ekinci, K., Keener, H.M., Elwell, D.L., 2000. Composting short paper ber with broiler
litter and additives. Compos. Sci. Util. 8, 160172.
Fang, M., Wong, J.W.C., 1999. Effect of lime amendment on availability of heavy
metals and maturation in sewage sludge composting. Environ. Pollut. 106, 83
89.
Finger, S.M., Hatch, R.T., Regan, T.M., 1976. Aerobic microbial growth in semisolid
matrices: heat and mass transfer limitation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 18, 11931218.
Gao, M.C., Li, B., Yu, A., Liang, F.Y., Yang, L.J., Sun, Y.X., 2010. The effect of aeration
rate on forced-aeration composting of chicken manure and sawdust. Bioresour.
Technol. 101, 18991903.
Giusti, E., Marsili-Libelli, S., 2010. Fuzzy modeling of the composting process.
Environ. Modell. Softw. 25, 641647.
Gonzales, H.B., Sakashita, H., Nakano, Y., Nishijma, W., Okada, M., 2010. Food waste
mineralization and accumulation in biological solubilization and composting
process. Chemosphere 79, 238241.
Guo, R., Li, G.X., Jiang, T., Schuchardt, F., Chen, T.B., Zhao, Y.Q., Shen, Y.J., 2012. Effect
of aeration rate, C/N ratio and moisture content on the stability and maturity of
compost. Bioresour. Technol. 112, 171178.
Hall, S.G., 1998. Temperature feedback and control via aeration rate regulation in
biological composting systems. Ph.D. Dissertation. Cornell University, Ithaca. NY.
Hamelers, H.V.M., 2004. Modeling composting kinetics: a review of approaches.
Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 3, 331342.
Haug, R.T., 1993. The Practical Handbook of Compost Engineering. Lewis Publishers,
Boca Raton, USA.
He, L., Huang, G.H., Zeng, G.M., Lu, H.W., 2008. A fuzzy inexact mixed-integer semiinnite programming method for municipal solid waste management planning.
J. Environ. Eng-ASCE. 134, 572581.
He, L., Huang, G.H., Lu, H.W., Zeng, G.M., 2009. Optimal regional solid waste
management strategies through a new inexact integer model containing innite
objectives and constraints. Waste Manage. 29, 2131.
He, L., Huang, G.H., Lu, H.W., 2011a. Greenhouse gas emissions control in integrated
waste management through mixed integer bilevel decision-making. J. Hazard.
Mater. 193, 112119.
He, X.S., Xi, B.D., Wei, Z.M., Guo, X.J., Li, M.X., An, D., Liu, H.L., 2011b. Spectroscopic
characterization of water extractable organic matter during composting of
municipal solid waste. Chemosphere 82, 541548.
Hellebrand, H.J., 1998. Emission of nitrous oxide and other trace gases during
composting of grass and green waste. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 69, 365375.
Higgins, C.W., Walker, L.P., 2001. Validation of a new model for aerobic organic
solids decomposition: simulations with substrate specic kinetics. Process
Biochem. 36, 875884.
Huang, G.F., Wong, J.W.C., Wu, Q.T., Nagar, B.B., 2004. Effect of C/N on composting of
pig manure with sawdust. Waste Manage. 24, 805813.
Huet, J., Druilhe, C., Trmier, A., Benoist, J.C., Debenest, G., 2012. The impact of
compaction, moisture content, particle size and type of bulking agent on initial
physical properties of sludge-bulking agent mixtures before composting.
Bioresour. Technol. 114, 428436.
Iqbal, K.M., Shaq, T., Ahmed, K., 2010. Characterization of bulking agents and its
effects on physical properties of compost. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 19131919.
Jeong, Y.K., Kim, J.S., 2001. A new method for conservation of nitrogen in aerobic
composting processes. Bioresour. Technol. 79, 129133.
Jiang, T., Schuchardt, F., Li, G.X., Guo, R., Luo, Y.M., 2013. Gaseous emission during
the composting of pig feces from Chinese Ganqinfen system. Chemosphere 90,
15451551.
Jiang, T., Schuchardt, F., Li, G.X., Guo, R., Zhao, Y.Q., 2011. Effect of C/N ratio, aeration
rate and moisture content on ammonia and greenhouse gas emission during the
composting. J. Environ. Sci. 23, 17541760.
Kaiser, J., 1996. Modelling composting as a microbial ecosystem: a simulation
approach. Ecol. Modell. 91, 2537.
Kim, J.D., Park, J.S., In, B.H., Kim, D., Namkoong, W., 2008. Evaluation of pilot-scale
in-vessel composting for food waste treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 154, 272277.
Kim, K.H., Pandey, S.K., Jo, H.J., Jeon, E.C., 2012. Characteristics of
chlorouorocarbons (CFCs) emitted from a municipal waste treatment facility.
Chemosphere 89, 13841389.
Kishimoto, M., Preechaphan, C., Yoshida, T., Taguchi, H., 1987. Simulation of an
aerobic composting of activated sludge using a statistical procedure. World J.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 3, 113123.
Kleinman, L.I., 2005. The dependence of tropospheric ozone production rate on
ozone precursors. Atmos. Environ. 39, 575586.
Komilis, D.P., Ham, R.K., Park, J.K., 2004. Emission of volatile organic compounds
during composting of municipal solid wastes. Water Res. 38, 17071714.
Kumar, M., Ou, Y.L., Lin, J.G., 2010. Co-composting of green waste and food waste at
low C/N ratio. Waste Manage. 30, 602609.
Kumar, S., Kumar, M., Thurow, K., Stoll, R., Kragl, U., 2009. Fuzzy ltering for robust
bioconcentration factor modeling. Environ. Modell. Softw. 24, 4453.
Lashermes, G., Barriuso, E., Houot, S., 2012. Dissipation pathways of organic
pollutants during the composting of organic wastes. Chemosphere 87, 137143.
Lei, F., Vander Gheynst, J.S., 2000. The effect of microbial inoculation and pH on
microbial community structure changes during composting. Process Biochem.
35, 923929.
Liang, C., Das, K.C., McClendon, R.W., 2003a. The inuence of temperature and
moisture contents regimes on the aerobic microbial activity of a biosolids
composting blend. Bioresour. Technol. 86, 131137.
Liang, C., Das, K.C., McClendon, R.W., 2003b. Prediction of microbial activity during
biosolids composting using articial neural networks. T. ASAE. 46, 17131719.
Liang, Y., 2000. Nitrogen retention in the high stage of composting. Ph.D.
Dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Lin, C., 2008. A negative-pressure aeration system for composting food wastes.
Bioresour. Technol. 99, 76517656.
Lin, Y.P., 2006. Simulation Modeling And Process Control Of Composting Systems
Under Complexity And Uncertainty. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Regina,
Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Lin, Y.P., Huang, G.H., Lu, H.W., He, L., 2008a. Modeling of substrate degradation and
oxygen consumption in waste composting processes. Waste Manage. 28, 1375
1385.
Lin, Y.P., Huang, G.H., Lu, H.W., He, L., 2008b. A simulation-aided factorial analysis
approach for characterizing interactive effects of system factors on composting
processes. Sci. Total Environ. 402, 268277.
Lpez-Real, J., Foster, M., 1985. Plant pathogen survival during composting of
agricultural waste. In: Gasser, J.K.R. (Ed.), Composting of Agricultural Wastes.
Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp. 291299.
1257
Stabnikova, O., Ding, H.B., Tay, J.H., Wang, J.Y., 2005. Biotechnology for aerobic
conversion of food waste into organic fertilizer. Waste Manage. Res. 23, 3947.
Stentiford, E.I., 1996. Composting control: principles and practice. In: de Bertoldi,
M., Sequi, P., Lemmes, B., Papi, T. (Eds.), The Science of composting, Part 1.
Blackie, Glasgow, pp. 5659.
Stombaugh, D.P., Nokes, S.E., 1996. Development of a biologically base aerobic
composting simulation model. T. ASAE 39, 239250.
Sole-Mauri, F., Illa, J., Magr, A., Prenafeta-Bold, F.X., Flotats, X., 2007. An integrated
biochemical and physical model for the composting process. Bioresour. Technol.
98, 32783293.
Sun, W., Huang, G.H., Zeng, G.M., Qin, X.S., Sun, X.L., 2009. A stepwise-cluster
microbial biomass inference model in food waste composting. Waste Manage.
29, 29562968.
Sun, w., Huang, G.H., Zeng, G.M., Qin, X.S., Yu, H., 2011. Quantitative effects of
composting state variables on C/N ratio through GA-aided multivariate analysis.
Sci. Total Environ. 409, 12431254.
Tang, L., Zeng, G.M., Shen, G.L., Zhang, Y., Huang, G.H., Li, J.B., 2006. Simultaneous
amperometric determination of lignin peroxidase and manganese peroxidase
activities in compost bioremediation using articial neural networks. Anal.
Chim. Acta 579, 109116.
Tang, Z., Yu, G.H., Liu, D.Y., Xu, D.B., Shen, Q.R., 2011. Different analysis techniques
for uorescence excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy to assess compost
maturity. Chemosphere 82, 12021208.
Tiquia, S.M., 1996. Further composting of pig-manure disposed from the pig-onlitter (POL) system in Hong Kong. Ph.D. Dissertation. The university of Hong
Kong. Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong.
Tiquia, S.M., 2010. Reduction of compost phytotoxicity during the process of
decomposition. Chemosphere 79, 506512.
Turan, N.G., Akdemir, A., Ergun, O.N., 2009. Removal of volatile organic compounds
by natural materials during composting of poultry litter. Bioresour. Technol.
100, 798803.
Ugwuanyi, J.O., 1999. Effect of process temperature, pH and suspended solids
content upon pasteurization of a model agricultural waste during thermophilic
aerobic digestion. J. Appl. Microbiol. 87, 387395.
Van lier, J.J.C., van Ginkel, J.T., Straatsma, G., Gerrits, J.P.G., van Griensven, L.J.L.D.,
1994. Composting of mushroom substrate in a fermentation tunnel compost
parameters and a mathematical model. Neth. J. Age. Sci. 42, 271292.
Vander Gheynst, J., Walker, L., Parlange, J., 1997. Energy transport in a high-solids
aerobic degradation process: mathematical modeling and analysis. Biotechnol.
Prog. 13, 238248.
Xi, B.D., He, X.S., Wei, Z.M., Jiang, Y.H., Li, M.X., Li, D., Li, Y., Dang, Q.L., 2012. Effect of
inoculation methods on the composting efciency of municipal solid wastes.
Chemosphere 88, 744750.
Xi, B.D., Qin, X.S., Su, X.K., Jiang, Y.H., Wei, Z.M., 2008. Characterizing effects of
uncertainties in MSW composting process through a coupled fuzzy vertex and
factorial-analysis approach. Waste Manage. 28, 16091623.
Yu, H., Huang, G.H., 2009. Effect of sodium as a PH control amendment on the
composting of food waste. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 20052011.
Zhang, Y.M., Huang, G.H., He, L., Li, Y.P., 2008. Quality evaluation for composting
products through fuzzy latent component analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 52,
11321140.
Zhu, N.W., 2007. Effect of low initial C/N ratio on aerobic composting of swine
manure with rice straw. Bioresour. Technol. 98, 913.