G.R. Nos.

183591, 183572, 183893, 183951 and 183962 THE PROVINCE OF NORTH COTABATO, duly represented
by GOVERNOR JESUS SACDALAN and/or VICE-GOVERNOR EMMANUEL PINOL, for and his own behalf,
Petitioners, versus THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEACE PANEL ON
ANCESTRAL DOMAIN (GRP), represented by SEC. RODOLFO GARCIA, ATTY. SEDFREY CANDELARIA,
MARK RYAN SULLIVAN, and/or GEN. HERMOGENES ESPERON, JR., the latter in his capacity as the present and
duly-appointed Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process (OPAPP) or the so-called Office of the Presidential Adviser
on the Peace Process, respondents.
SEPARATE CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION
I vote to consider the cases moot and academic considering the manifestation in the Memorandum, dated
September 24, 2008, filed by the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) that:
x x x The Executive Department has repeatedly and categorically stated that the MOA-AD will
not be signed in its present form or in any other form. The Chief Executive has in fact gone to the
extent of dissolving the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP) Panel and has decided to
take on a different tack and launch talks, no longer with rebels or rebel groups, but with more peaceloving community-based groups. x x x[1]
This development renders unnecessary a detailed analysis of each of the stipulations contained in the said MOAAD, which have grave constitutional implications on the sovereignty, territorial integrity and constitutional processes of
the Republic of the Philippines, all of which are non-negotiable when viewed in the context of the nature of the internal
conflict it seeks to address and the state of our nation today.
I believe this is a prudent move on the part of the Executive Department. By the very essence of our republican and
democratic form of government, the outcome of our constitutional processes, particularly the legislative process and the
constituent process of amending the constitution, cannot be predetermined or predicted with certainty as it is made to
appear by the consensus points of the MOA-AD. Consequently, it is beyond the authority of any negotiating panel to
commit the implementation of any consensus point or a legal framework which is inconsistent with the present
Constitution or existing statutes.
Moreover, our constitutional processes are well-defined by various provisions of the Constitution. The
establishment of a political and territorial space under a so-called Bangsamoro Juridical Entity (BJE) is nowhere to be
found in the 1987 Constitution, which provides for the countrys territorial and political subdivisions as follows:
The territorial and political subdivisions of the Republic of the Philippines are the provinces,
cities, municipalities, and barangays. There shall be autonomous regions in Muslim Mindanao and
the Cordilleras as hereinafter provided.[2]
In the case of the autonomous regions, their creation is the shared responsibility of the political branches of the
government and the constituent units affected. The Constitution is explicit in this regard, to wit:
The Congress shall enact an organic act for each autonomous region with the assistance and
participation of the regional consultative commission composed of representatives appointed by the
President from a list of nominees from multisectoral bodies. The organic act shall define the basic
structure of government for the region consisting of the executive department and legislative assembly,
both of which shall be elective and representative of the constituent political units. The organic acts shall
likewise provide for special courts with personal, family, and property law jurisdiction consistent with the
provisions of this constitution and national law.
The creation of the autonomous region shall be effective when approved by majority of the votes
cast by the constituent units in a plebiscite called for the purpose, provided that only provinces, cities, and
geographic areas voting favorably in such plebiscite shall be included in the autonomous
region.[3] (Emphasis supplied)

If the establishment of autonomy requires the joint participation of Congress, the President, and of the people in the
area affected, from the inception of the process of creation of an autonomous region, with more reason, the creation of
the BJE an entity intended to have its own basic law to be adopted in accordance with an associative arrangement which would imply, in legal terms, semi-independence if not outright independence cannot be negotiated without the
participation of Congress and consultations with the people, residing not only in the area to be placed under the BJE but
also in the rest of our country. Even with the participation of Congress and the consultation with stakeholders, the process
at the onset must conform and explicitly be subject to our Constitution. This is specially important as the unsigned MOAAD stipulates a definite framework that threatens to erase, through the policies, rules and regulations and basic law of
the BJE, the objective existence of over four hundred (400) years of development and progress of our people by unsettling
private voluntary agreements and undoing the official acts of our government institutions performed pursuant to the
Constitution and the laws in force during the said long period in our history, within the identified areas, to be carved out of
a substantial portion of the national territory, and with only the details, the mechanisms and modalities for actual
implementation to be negotiated and embodied in a Comprehensive Compact. To my mind, this alarming possibility
contemplated in the MOA-AD may be the cause of chaos and even greater strife for our brothers in the south, rather than
bring about the intended peace.