Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
3/08/09
17:11
Page 477
Oil & Gas Science and Technology Rev. IFP, Vol. 64 (2009), No. 4, pp. 477-487
Copyright 2009, Institut franais du ptrole
DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2009012
Rsum tude de simulation du drainage gravitaire assist par injection de vapeur dans les
systmes fracturs Le drainage gravitaire assist par injection de vapeur (Steam Assisted Gravity
Drainage, SAGD), procd de rcupration amliore du ptrole (Enhanced Oil Recovery, EOR) mis au
point pour la production assiste du ptrole et de bitume, est tudi de manire thorique et de manire
exprimentale avec des modles et dans des rservoirs conventionnels et se rvle tre une mthode
dEOR prometteuse dans certains rservoirs dhuile lourde. Dans le prsent travail, des tudes par
simulation du SAGD ont t ralises sur diffrents modles fracturs, les fractures se trouvant la fois
dans la zone voisine du puits et dans la zone au-dessus du puits, et mme en prsence de rseaux de
fractures. un stade prcoce du processus de SAGD dans un systme fractur, la vapeur se dplace
dabord travers les fractures, puis les blocs de la matrice sont chauffs principalement par conduction et
ventuellement par une certaine pntration de la vapeur. Linterface huile-vapeur se forme et se
dveloppe partir de tous les cts de la matrice et de la chambre de vapeur et non par formation et
rtrcissement dune chambre de vapeur au centre de chaque bloc. La rcupration par SAGD augmente
en prsence de fractures verticales mais elle est gne par les fractures horizontales. Lespacement des
fractures nest pas un paramtre trs important dans la mise en uvre des procds par vapeur dans les
modles fracturs. Une frquence de fracture leve amliore les rsultats par SAGD en rduisant la
dure ncessaire pour le chauffage du bloc de matrice et en amliorant le processus de chauffage par
conduction. Leffet des fractures horizontales entre les puits dinjection et les puits de production est
insignifiant dans la mesure o le mcanisme de ralisation de SAGD dpend de la formation dune
chambre de vapeur dans la zone au-dessus du puits plutt que dans la zone voisine du puits. Une
augmentation de lextension des fractures horizontales rduit la rcupration finale de ptrole qui peut
tre obtenue par SAGD. Dans le modle de rseau de fractures, la prsence de fractures verticales
amliore la rcupration par rapport ce qui est obtenu dans le cas de fractures horizontales seules.
Abstract Simulation Study of Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) in Fractured Systems
The Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) process, a developed Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)
process to recover oil and bitumen, has been studied theoretically and experimentally in conventional
reservoirs and models and is found a promising EOR method for certain heavy oil reservoirs. In this
work simulation studies of the SAGD process were made on different fractured models consisting of
fractures in both Near Well Region (NWR) and Above Well Region (AWR) and even in the presence of
networked fractures. At early stage of the SAGD process in fractured system, steam moves through the
fractures first and then the matrix blocks are heated primarily by conduction and possibly some steam
invasion. The steam-oil interface forms and develops from all sides of the matrix and oil chamber rather
than a steam chamber forms and shrinks in the center of each block. SAGD process recovery enhanced
03_ogst08053_Fatemi
3/08/09
478
17:11
Page 478
Oil & Gas Science and Technology Rev. IFP, Vol. 64 (2009), No. 4
in the presence of vertical fractures but horizontal fractures were harmful on the recovery. Fracture
spacing was not a very important parameter in the performance of steam processes in fractured models.
High fracture frequency improved SAGD performance since it reduced the time period necessary for
heating the matrix block and enhanced heating process by conduction. Horizontal fractures between
injector-producer wells had an insignificant effect on the process since SAGD production mechanism is
based on steam chamber development in AWR rather than NWR. Horizontal fractures extension increase
reduced ultimate oil recovery attainable by SAGD. In the networked fracture model the presence of
vertical fractures improved the recovery achieved in the case of horizontal fractures alone.
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction to SAGD Process
The recovery of heavy crudes uses a special form of steam
flooding that has become known as steam-assisted gravity
drainage (SAGD) [1, 2].
SAGD was developed by Butler for the in situ recovery
of the Alberta bitumen. The process relies on the gravity
segregation of steam, utilizing a pair of parallel horizontal
wells, maximizing the use of gravity forces, placed 5 m
apart (in the case of tar sands) in the same vertical plane
[2, 3].
The top well is the steam injector, and the bottom well
serves as the producer. Steam rises to the top of the
formation, forming a steam chamber. High reduction in
viscosity mobilizes the bitumen, which drains down by
gravity and is captured by the producer placed near the
bottom of the reservoir. Continuous injection of steam causes
the steam chamber to expand and spread laterally in the
reservoir. High vertical permeability is crucial for the success
of SAGD. The process performs better with bitumen and oils
with low mobility, which is essential for the formation of a
steam chamber, and not steam channels [1]. SAGD has been
more effective in Alberta than in California and Venezuela
for the same reason [4].
In SAGD process the movement of oil to the production
well is caused by gravity forces, and the geometry is such
that the oil moves approximately parallel to the interface that
forms the boundary of a growing, steam-saturated zone
known as the steam chamber [1].
In the ideal SAGD process, a growing steam chamber
forms around the horizontal injector and steam flows
continuously to the perimeter of the chamber where it
condenses and heats the surrounding oil. Effective initial
heating of the cold oil is important for the formation of the
steam chamber in gravity drainage processes [5].
The intention in developing the steam-assisted gravity
drainage process was to devise a means whereby heavy oil or
bitumen could be removed in a systematic manner in order to
give a more complete recovery than is possible in conventional steam flooding processes, where the oil is moved by
pushing it with injected fluids [1].
03_ogst08053_Fatemi
3/08/09
17:11
Page 479
S Mobeen Fatemi / Simulation Study of Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) in Fractured Systems
479
03_ogst08053_Fatemi
480
3/08/09
17:11
Page 480
Oil & Gas Science and Technology Rev. IFP, Vol. 64 (2009), No. 4
TABLE 1
The lumped oil system in the simulation
Component
LO
(MW = 250)
0.1614
MO (MW = 450)
0.2356
HO
0.6030
(MW = 600)
TABLE 2
Data for initializing the conventional model
Figure 1
Schematic representation of conventional (left) and fractured
(right) models.
Parameters
Values
Length in X, Y, Z-direction
Porosity
0.3
Permeability
10 md
Number of pseudocomponents
Temperature
51C
Initial pressure
517 107 Pa
0.2
0.15
1/1
Steam quality
0.7
TABLE 3
Data for initializing the fractured model
Grid type
Cartesian
Fracture porosity
1.00
Fracture permeability
10000 md
03_ogst08053_Fatemi
3/08/09
17:11
Page 481
481
S Mobeen Fatemi / Simulation Study of Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) in Fractured Systems
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
100
80
Oil recovery factor SCTR
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
60
40
20
SAGD - Conventional model II.irf
SAGD - Fractured model.irf
0
2008-1
2008-7
2009-1
2009-7
Time (Date)
2010-1
Figure 3
Oil recovery comparison for conventional and fractured
models (see Fig. 1).
03_ogst08053_Fatemi
3/08/09
482
17:11
Page 482
Oil & Gas Science and Technology Rev. IFP, Vol. 64 (2009), No. 4
Figure 4
Different fractured model to study the effect of fracture geometrical properties.
03_ogst08053_Fatemi
3/08/09
17:11
Page 483
483
S Mobeen Fatemi / Simulation Study of Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) in Fractured Systems
1.00
1.00
0.90
0.90
0.80
0.80
0.70
0.70
0.60
0.60
0.50
0.50
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.00
Figure 5
Oil saturation profile in A (left) and D (right) patterns after
10 months.
100
80
60
40
20
SAGD - Pattern A.irf
SAGD - Pattern D.irf
2010
2012
2014 2016
Time (Date)
2018
2020
Figure 6
Effect of vertical fractures on oil recovery vs. time.
3.00e-4
100
SAGD - Pattern A.irf
SAGD - Pattern D.irf
80
Oil recovery factor SCTR
2.50e-4
2.00e-4
1.50e-4
1.00e-4
40
20
5.00e-5
0.00e+0
60
2008-7
2009-1 2009-7
Time (Date)
2010-1
2010-7
2010
2012
2014 2016
Time (Date)
2018
Figure 7
Figure 8
2020
03_ogst08053_Fatemi
3/08/09
17:11
484
Page 484
Oil & Gas Science and Technology Rev. IFP, Vol. 64 (2009), No. 4
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.80
0.80
0.80
0.80
0.70
0.70
0.70
0.70
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Figure 11
Figure 9
Oil saturation profile in pattern D (left) and pattern E (right)
after 10 months.
80
80
Oil recovery factor SCTR
100
100
60
40
20
2010
2012
2014 2016
Time (Date)
2018
2020
Figure 10
Vertical fractures density effect on oil recovery vs. time.
60
40
20
2010
2012
2014 2016
Time (Date)
2018
2020
Figure 12
Effect of horizontal fracture on oil recovery vs. time.
03_ogst08053_Fatemi
3/08/09
17:11
Page 485
485
S Mobeen Fatemi / Simulation Study of Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) in Fractured Systems
1.00
1.00
0.90
0.90
0.80
0.80
0.70
0.70
0.60
0.60
0.50
0.50
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.00
Figure 13
Oil saturation in patterns F (left) and G (right), after 10 months.
60
80
40
60
20
SAGD - Pattern F.irf
SAGD - Pattern G.irf
2010
2012
2014 2016
Time (Date)
2018
80
40
20
2020
Figure 14
2010
2012
2014 2016
Time (Date)
2018
2020
Figure 15
Effect of horizontal fractures density on oil recovery.
75
60
45
30
15
2010
2012
2014 2016
Time (Date)
2018
2020
Figure 16
Effect of horizontal fractures spacing on oil recovery vs. time.
03_ogst08053_Fatemi
3/08/09
486
17:11
Page 486
Oil & Gas Science and Technology Rev. IFP, Vol. 64 (2009), No. 4
100
80
80
60
40
20
60
40
20
2010
2012
2014 2016
Time (Date)
2018
2020
2008-7
2009-1 2009-7
Time (Date)
2010-1
Figure 17
Figure 18
2010-7
TABLE 4
Ultimate oil recovery factor in the case of each pattern
Pattern
Oil Recovery
Pattern
Oil Recovery
82%
75%
85%
77%
87%
63%
89%
55%
92%
83%
78%
79%
CONCLUSIONS
SAGD oil recovery mechanism is different in fractured models
and conventional ones, since in the single block fractured
model oil chamber rather than steam chamber develops.
Vertical fractures improve oil recovery compare to the disastrous effect of horizontal fractures. Vertical fractures density
increase, improves SAGD oil recovery but horizontal fractures density increase restricts steam chamber development
in reservoir. Near injection well horizontal fractures have less
effect on recovery than far ones. In networked fractures, vertical fractures improve recovery achievable by horizontal
fractures.
REFERENCES
1 Butler R.M. (1991) Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen,
Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
2 Butler R.M. (1998) SAGD Comes of AGE, J. Can. Petrol.
Technol. 37, 7, 9-12.
03_ogst08053_Fatemi
3/08/09
17:11
Page 487
S Mobeen Fatemi / Simulation Study of Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) in Fractured Systems
487