Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
2011
Integrated financial and sustainability report
People
Profit
Planet
Number of employees
Fatal accidents
6,435
617*
Injury frequency
58.1 1.22
%
10.9 1.5
%
3.1%
0.1%
1,296
TJ
191 TJ
9 million
254 -25
million
million
3 million
5 million
162
1
million
Net result
Equity
59
71 million
6%
0.7%
Heat produced
million
EBITDAE
GWh
1,186
0.05 mtons
22.4 694
0.3%
Training efforts
mtons
Electricity supplied to
the grid
Energy efficiency
5.1
Staff turnover
1.4%
Absence rate
Revenue
million
233
million
3 million
8 million
* With exception to the number of employees, the key figures relating to People do not include
the performances of the acquired Veolia Belgium in 2011.
Profile
Van Gansewinkel Groep is a waste service provider as
well as a raw materials and energy supplier. The company collects waste and processes waste into raw materials and energy. Our home market is Benelux, but Van
Gansewinkel Groep is also active in Germany, France,
Portugal, the Czech Republic, Poland and Hungary. Approximately 7,500 people realise annual revenues of
around 1.2 billion.
The worldwide population growth and increasing prosperity are forcing the demand for raw materials up,
while at the same time supplies are diminishing. In
the longer term, we should expect physical shortages
of materials worldwide.
The scarcity of raw materials forms the basis for our
strategy. Van Gansewinkel Groeps services and renewables (secondary raw materials and fuels) are inside the
processes and products of more and more customers.
We study our customers operating processes and use
our expertise and experience to minimise the waste
4,956 fte
**6.198 fte
Recycling
Revenue 142 million
414 fte
Van Gansewinkel
Coolrec
Maltha
Van Gansewinkel
Minerals
AVR
Collection and
processing of waste.
Supplier of material
streams, such as
paper, construction
and demolition
waste, metals,
aluminium, copper,
wood and plastics.
Recycling
of electrical
and electronic
equipment. Supplier
of recycled steel,
copper, plastics
and aluminium,
amongst other
things.
Recycling
of glass products.
Supplier
of recycled glass.
Processing of
residual waste.
Supplier of energy.
* Revenue to the sum of 81 million has been eliminated from the total revenue, in connection with intercompany transactions between the separate divisions.
** The total number of fte of Van Gansewinkel Groep (excluding temporary staff) includes 363 fte working for the Group.
Key figures
2011
2010
2009
6,435
5,818
5,780
1,061
1,175
1,107
10.9
14
12
7.4
1.5
1.4
11
14
0.19
0.24
0.28
5.1
5.4
5.1
58.1
56.7
56.5
1.22
1.17
1.20
22.4
23.1
26.1
19.4
20.6
20.4
14.6
13.5
13.7
7.9
9.2
9.4
879.5
875
1,030
1,296
1,487
2,470
1,186
1,115
1,137
254
249
259
21%
22%
23%
59
50
-73
Net result
-25
-22
-188
Equity
162
154
179
233
230
245
4%
3%
-7%
8.2
8.2
8.1
People*
Planet
** With exception to the number of employees, the key figures relating to People do not include the performances of the acquired Veolia
Belgium in 2011.
** EBITDAE represents the earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation and exceptional items. Exceptional items are
normalised to allow a similar comparison between the results without the impact of non-recurring/exceptional income and expense.
Exceptional items are not included in the results in the companys management reports. For a reconciliation between the EBITDAE
used for management purposes and the EBITDA presented in the financial report, please refer to page 123 of the financial report.
The EBITDA presented in the financial report comprises the earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation.
Contents
Risk management .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
76
82
10
Corporate Governance .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13
14
15
15
18
19
21
22
24
34
46
53
63
64
66
67
Colophon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
70
From the
CEO
Strong position
Pressure on prices at .
Collection Netherlands
Regrettably, we were unable to sufficiently compensate
the erosion of rates at the Dutch collection activities.
The prices are under pressure as a result of the overcapacity in the incineration market. Van Gansewinkel
expects this market to regain more balance in the future, as a result of the considerable volumes of waste
imported from abroad. This is good and a cause for optimism in the short term. However, in the long term it
does not offer a proper structural solution. The global
scarcity of raw materials will cause the importance of
waste incineration to diminish and that of high-quality
reuse of materials to increase.
In our view, the latter argument is the main reason for
structurally phasing out capacity in the Netherlands.
Waste incineration will become less important in our
industry. As a consequence, plants not located centrally,
that lack the necessary scale and have limited possibilities to access grids for heating (households) and steam
(businesses), will be particularly concerned about the
future.
In 2010, as the first operator in the market to make this
move, we closed one of our three incineration plants
and reduced our own capacity by 15%. The focus for the
remaining capacity is now on achieving higher energy
yields. The pork cycle, as it is commonly known, in the
waste incineration has forced us to innovate. Despite
the structurally lower gate rates at the front end, our
EBITDAE margins are returning to previous levels,
thanks to higher energy yields. Contracts with the Heat
Distribution Company of Rotterdam for district heating
and with Stoompijp bv to supply steam to nearby businesses will cause our energy yields to roughly double
within three years time.
Ruud Sondag
Chairman of the Board of Directors
rvb@vangansewinkel.com
Report of The
Supervisory Board
The Supervisory Board meets with the Board of Directors to discuss current projects. Other topics that are
highlighted besides the companys financial position
include market developments and developments in
terms of safety, customer satisfaction and employee
satisfaction.
The Supervisory Board met six times during 2011.
Members of the Supervisory Board who cannot physically attend a meeting participate by video conference
or telephone conference call. One member made use of
this option on two occasions in 2011. The following issues were addressed during the meetings:
Market developments
Developments in financial and operational results
Safety
The 2010 annual results, the 2010 sustainability
report and the accompanying management letter
from the auditor
Strategy and the Mid-Term Plan
Risk management
The financial position
Refinancing in 2011
Ownership structure
Selection of a new auditor
Acquisitions and proposed investments
Cost-cutting and improvement programmes
Energy efficiency at AVR Rozenburg
The 2012 budget
The Supervisory Board discussed the 2010 financial
and sustainability report when it met in April 2011. The
external auditor was present at that meeting.
From left to right: Carel van den Driest, Reinhard Gorenflos, Hugo van Berckel and Peter Berdowski.
The Supervisory Board monitors the strategic and financial policies of Van Gansewinkel Groep. In 2011,
the Board was made up of Chairman Reinhard Gorenflos (Partner KKR), Hugo van Berckel (Partner
CVC), Peter Berdowski (CEO of Koninklijke Boskalis Westminster nv) and Carel van den Driest (former
CEO of Koninklijke Vopak nv). Hugo van Berckel was appointed Chairman of the Supervisory Board on
1 January 2012.
Committees
The financial audit committee is made up of Mr Gorenflos and Mr Van Berckel, as are the selection and remuneration committees. The remuneration committee
has defined the following criteria for the bonus system:
EBITDAE
Operational performance
Free cash flows before finance costs
Employee satisfaction
Safety (IF)
The shareholders define the remuneration policy, and
the independent members of the Supervisory Board
determine whether the remuneration constitutes an
acceptable reflection of the relationships within the
company (see the information about the remuneration
of the Board of Directors in 2011 on page 129).
Supervisory Board
The Supervisory Board attaches a great deal of importance to sustainable and transparent operations. Gorenflos explains, Van Gansewinkel Groeps performances
in this respect are excellent. The companys strategy,
business case and working methods prove that economy and ecology definitely go hand-in-hand. We also
fully endorse the companys decision to sign the Global
Compact, an initiative of the United Nations to boost
corporate social responsibility.
Right priorities
Given the difficult market conditions, the Supervisory Board is pleased with the performances that
Van Gansewinkel Groep recorded in 2011. Despite
the unfavourable circumstances, the company
made considerable progress in many respects, the
members of the Board state unanimously.
The overcapacity in the Dutch waste incineration market caused substantial price erosion at Energy from
Waste, which visibly carried over to the collection market in 2011. Van Gansewinkel Groep has managed to
retain its volumes and to offset much of the decline in
prices by implementing efficiency improvements across
the whole group, explains Hugo van Berckel, Chairman
of the Supervisory Board.
The realisation of the objectives of the efficiency programmes defined by the company despite the difficult
market deserves a big compliment, says Carel van den
Driest. This is illustrated nicely by the energy-fromwaste plant in Rozenburg: after a reorganisation and
with its focus on energy yields it is positioned favourably for future growth. Management has made full use
of the potential for improvement at Energy from Waste,
and has made important strategic steps: Van Gansewinkel Groep will supply energy to more and more homes
and businesses.
10
The Supervisory Board makes sure that the right priorities are targeted. We compare managements plans for
growth with the strategic framework. If the relationship
is a healthy one, management operates the throttle and
the Supervisory Board controls the brakes. That is how
it is at Van Gansewinkel Groep, Berdowski explains.
We say: think about tomorrow, but also seize whatever
opportunities present themselves today and make sure
that you excel in your core activities. The financial resources and the amount of attention that management
can give are limited, after all.
The Supervisory Board also expects market conditions
to remain difficult during the coming years. The sensible thing to do in that case is to operate with caution
and continue to sort matters out internally, says Van
Berckel. Van Gansewinkel Groep is doing this better
than anybody else. The company will continue to implement efficiency and quality improvements. For example,
in 2012 management will examine which of the organisations processes can be standardised and computerised. That is evolution, not revolution. Such initiatives
reflect the ongoing focus on improvement and mean
that Van Gansewinkel Groep continues to take the lead
in the sector.
Safety is one theme that is on the agenda every time the
Supervisory Board meets. The figures show a positive
trend, but in terms of safety there is always room for
improvement and you must never be satisfied, Van den
Driest emphasises. Severe accidents are by definition
important items on the agenda. What caused them? What
lessons can we draw from them? Those are things that
we, as the companys supervisory body, want to know.
11
Corporate Governance
Committed employees
The Supervisory Board also noticed a great deal of engagement and flexibility among the employees of Van
Gansewinkel Groep in 2011. The Supervisory Board
noticed the same engagement among the members of
the Central Works Council. Van den Driest comments,
Employee participation at Van Gansewinkel Groep is
a critical, but constructive process. The Central Works
Council has many of the same issues on its agenda as
we do, and is primarily concerned with the impact that
measures have on the employees. That is positive.
The Supervisory Board wishes to express its gratitude
to all the companys employees for the dedication displayed. The difficult market conditions have placed
significant demands on them, and they all deserve a
compliment for the results achieved.
12
accountability that the Corporate Governance Code imposes on enterprises perfectly reflects Van Gansewinkel Groeps philosophy and the way in which it conducts
is business.
Risk management has the full attention of the Board
of Directors. The principle is to map out any risks that
arise and ensure that communications about those risks
are as transparent as possible. The Board of Directors
will use the relevant principles from the Corporate Governance Code in this process.
One of the strategic objectives of our current shareholders is that in due course Van Gansewinkel Groep
will change ownership, and going public is one of the
options. This will mean even stricter requirements for
the transparency and accountability in our business
conduct.
As such, the companys corporate governance was further professionalised during the reporting year. Preparations have been made to amend the regulations for
the Board of Directors and the Supervisory Board. A
decision will be made in the proposed amendments in
2012. In addition, a decision was made in 2011 about
a code of conduct, which will be implemented early in
2012. The company also supports the principles of the
United Nations Global Compact programme and will
publish reports on their implementation starting in the
2012 reporting year.
It is our intention to continue to concretely implement
the course we have adopted, of ensuring transparent
communications with our stakeholders about our strategy, results, risks and opportunities (SWOT). Our GRI
A+ status, reporting in accordance with IFRS and the
information in this annual report demonstrate that we
are actually putting that ambition into practice.
13
Report of the
Board of Directors
Mission
Waste is produced wherever people work or live. And
sooner or later that waste is generally removed, cleaned
up or destroyed. Van Gansewinkel Groep sees matters
differently. We see it as our duty not to throw away anything at all. Because in the long term throwing waste
away contributes nothing, to business or to society.
Core values
Putting the customer first
Progressive
Prioritising safety
Vision
Most people see waste as something undesirable, something that has no value. Van Gansewinkel Groep has
a different view. Todays waste contains the seeds for
tomorrows products and goods. We even turn it into
something beautiful. We say, Waste No More.
Van Gansewinkel Groep works to find the most sustainable solution for its waste and gives as much waste as
possible a second life in the form of raw materials. It
can be given that second life because of our thorough
understanding of raw materials and logistics processes.
The waste that remains is used as fuel in our energyfrom-waste plants, allowing us to supply sustainable
electricity and heat to hundreds of thousands of homes
and businesses.
Core values
From left to right: Yves Luca, Diederik Gijsbers, Rob de Fluiter Balledux and Ruud Sondag.
14
Market position
Van Gansewinkel Groep is both a waste service provider and a supplier of raw materials and energy, and
is active in the whole of the waste supply chain. The
company collects all types of waste and treats and processes waste to produce raw materials and energy. With
a turnover of 1.2 billion, Van Gansewinkel Groep is
the market leader in the Benelux and among the ten
leading operators in Europe.
The existing portfolio and the existing geographic
spread offer an ideal platform for growth, which will
be realised both organically and through acquisitions.
Van Gansewinkel Groep intends to expand its waste
service activities and its recycling activities. The focus
in the consolidating waste incineration market is on
maximised energy yields.
15
Development
European
waste market
Development
European
waste
Top 9
Van
Gansewinkel
Groep
1.1
1.0
Sita
0.6
Shanks
0.4
Indaver
0.3
Attero
AEB
0.2
HVC
0.2
Omrin
0.1
Twence
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Top 10
Veolia
market
Three
different
phases
can
be distinguished
in the development
of the
European
market:
use landfills to
Three different
phases
can be
distinguished
in the development
of the European
waste
market: waste
countries
that usecountries
landfills to that
dispose
dispose
of their
waste
(phasethat
1); countries
and,incineration
on a limited
scale, incineration
orcountries
recycling
(phase
of their waste
(phase
1); countries
use landfillsthat
and,use
on a landfills
limited scale,
or recycling
(phase 2); and
that
focus 2); and countries
largely
on recycling,
little incineration
and barely
any landfilling
The
countries (phase
in which Van
Gansewinkel
Groep
operates
that
focus
largelywith
on recycling,
with little
incineration
and (phase
barely3).
any
landfilling
3). The
countries
in which
Van Gansewinkel
are divided
across these
three phases.
Van
Gansewinkel
Groep expects
that European Groep
countries
will eventually
evolve to phase
3, which
Groep
operates
are divided
across
these
three phases.
Van Gansewinkel
expects
that European
countries
will eventually
represents an estimated volume of 225 billion. The diagram below shows that the European waste market is a growth market. *
evolve to phase 3, which represents an estimated volume of 225 billion. The diagram below shows that the European waste market
is a growth market.
Size in billion
225
175
90
9.3
SUEZ
5.9
Phase 1
5.3
Remondis
FCC
3.7
Alba Group
2.7
ACS/Urbaser
1.5
Van
Gansewinkel
Groep
1.1
Ferrovial/Cespa
0.9
Biffa
0.8
Shanks
Phase 2
Phase 3
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
Revenue
Activities
Market position
816 million
Market leader
274 million
Challenger
Czech Republic
31 million
Follower
Poland
11 million
Follower
Other
54 million
Follower
1,186 million
Belgium
Total
For more information about our international activities see page 34.
16
The Netherlands
0.8
0.0
Virgin
material
Virgin
material
Incineration/
landfill
EfW
Production
Landfill
Production
Processing
Raw materials
trading
Virgin
material
Production
Processing
Aggregation &
Coordination
Distribution
Collection
Distribution
Collection
Users
Users
Distribution
Collection
Users
*
conducted by Deloitte (2010) at Van Gansewinkel Groeps request.
* Survey
Survey conducted by Deloitte (2010) at Van Gansewinkel Groeps request.
17
SWOT analysis
Strengths
18
Vision
Objective
Strategy
Threats
Strengthen position
Benelux
Optimise
home markets
Establish European
footprint
Points of action
Optimise
Energy from Waste
activities
Redefine
industry
Develop new
services
19
Key
Keyobjectives
objectives
Van Gansewinkel Groep extracts as many raw materials as possible from waste. However, some waste is
composed in such a manner that it is impossible to extract raw materials using existing technology. In such
cases, the waste is given another useful purpose: it is
incinerated and converted into sustainable energy. Van
Gansewinkel Groeps focus is on generating the highest
possible energy yields. Waste materials are seen as fuels that can be dosed to optimise the energy produced,
in the form of steam, heat or electricity. An example is
the provision of district heating. In this fashion AVR,
which is part of Van Gansewinkel Groep, is undergoing
a transformation from a traditional waste incinerator
into a supplier of sustainable energy.
Developments during 2011:
Import of waste from other countries to ensure
optimum capacity utilisation
Preparations for supplying district heating in
Rotterdam
Preparations for supplying steam to industrial sites
in the Rotterdam-Botlek area
3. Creation of a second home market in Central and Eastern Europe
20
People
Key objective
Indicator
Craftsmanship with
passion
Staff turnover
Employee motivation
Training efforts
Injury Frequency
10.0%
7.4
7.5
0.15
Absence rate
4.9%
Indicator
Waste remains a
raw material
Second life
Reduce ecological
footprint
CO2 emissions
prevented in the
total chain
Increase in high-quality
recycling
Notes
58.5%
1.25 mtons
23.1%
15
Planet
Key objective
Notes
1.8%
Severity rate
In this way raw materials retain their value, the continued availability of raw materials is ensured and fossil
exhaustion can be avoided. An understanding of materials is vital, and Van Gansewinkel Groep will continue
to invest in that area.
Profit
Key objective
Indicator
EBITDAE margin
Long-term partnerships
with customers (chain)
Return on capital
employed (ROCE)
6%
Customer
satisfaction
8.2
Notes
Growth initiatives should contribute directly to
EBITDAE, improve the balance sheet position and
reinforce the Waste No More proposition.
*
The
performanceindicator
indicator
objective
of increase
in high-quality
recycling
is the of
number
of projects
new C2C
projects implemented.
Besides thisindicator,
performance
indicator,
we also
* T
he performance
forfor
thethe
keykey
objective
of increase
in high-quality
recycling
is the number
new C2C
implemented.
Besides this performance
we also
seek to provide
seek to provide
about
the materials
for which
we have identified
a higher-grade
processing
method.
Inessential
many instances,
thisfull
is an
essentialofstep
towards full application
information
aboutinformation
the materials
for which
we have identified
a higher-grade
processing
method. In many
instances,
this is an
step towards
application
the cradle-to-cradle
principle.
This
can be illustratedprinciple.
by the implementation
of a recycling
for a stream of of
waste
that has method
previously
been incinerated,
using
a different
separation
technique
to further
increase
of the
Cradle-to-Cradle
This can be illustrated
bymethod
the implementation
a recycling
foronly
a stream
of waste that
has
previously
only been
incinerated,
using
a
the
proportion
of recycled
material,
working
with a producer
to take the
first stepsmaterial,
in realising
differentwith
design
and composition
a product
or for
a new
design approach
was adopted.
different
separation
technique
toor
further
increase
the proportion
of recycled
oraworking
a producer
to takeof
the
first steps
in which
realising
a different
design and
composition of a product or for which a new design approach was adopted.
21
Income model
Two directions, two customers
Van Gansewinkel Groep serves from two directions two customers.
At the front-end of the supply chain, we collect customers' waste
and process it to create new raw materials and energy. At the
back-end of the chain, we deliver those materials to specification
to customers for manufacturing new products.
Waste-driven
Trade-driven
M
o
NCY
ETE
MP
CO
er
,t
re
at
me
nt
steam
electricity
heat
sf
n
tra
Bio
g
wood
compost
textile
bio-plastics
paper
swill
Meta
ls
ferro
aluminium
rare earth metals
copper
silver/gold
transport
raw
ma
te
ria
ls
eN
AND CREATI
ON
DEM
ergy
En
e
in
rals
glass
ceramics
concrete
rubble
phosphate
Plast
ic
s
e
or
annual report 2011
The waste that is given a second life at Van Gansewinkel Groep can be divided between
five clusters of materials. It is vital to understand separation, recycling and processing
methods. This helps preserve raw materials and fuels and allows them to be used
infinitely without any drop in quality:
us mate
the materials roundabout.
no
r
d
an
e
g
a
stor
ls
ia
transp
ort
Understanding of materials,
treatment and selling
markets; trade spirit in raw
materials
Wa
s
te
22
TE-DRIVEN
WAS
transport
EN
IV
DR
r
TRADEt,
en
tm
trea
ec
yc
lin
g
Materials roundabout
Wa
st
n
tio
ec
co
ll
ls
ue
f
d
an
ET
RK
MA
re
CUST
OM
ER
ER
TOM
S
CU
Demand creation
PVC
PP/PE
ABS/Nylon
composites
resin
Van gansewinkel
Activities
Van Gansewinkel specialises in waste management,
flows of materials and logistics systems. The company
collects waste from households, businesses and institutions and transports the streams of waste to specific
treatment and processing locations. The object is to ensure that as much waste as possible is given a second
life in the form of raw materials for new products.
Market position
Van Gansewinkel is the market leader in the Benelux,
with a revenue of 828 million. Besides a small number
of major enterprises in the private sector, many regional
government authorities and other operators also have
positions in the market. Van Gansewinkel also operates
as a collection business in France, the Czech Republic
and Poland, where its market positions are, at present,
still small.
COO Diederik Gijsbers comments, The most important development by far at Collection & Services
was the acquisition of Veolia in Belgium. That takeover strengthened our market position in the Benelux
24
Market developments
The overcapacity in the waste incineration market had
an adverse impact on the Dutch market for Collection
& Services. Businesses and municipalities paid lower rates for collection of combustible commercial and
household waste, because the processing rates were
lower. Collection companies generally have long-term
contracts with waste processing businesses and shortterm contracts with customers. This disrupts the relationship between the collection rates and the processing rates.
In some parts of the Netherlands, processing rates are
so low that they are no longer sustainable and stand
in the way of innovation, says Diederik Gijsbers. As
a collection company, Van Gansewinkel also has longterm obligations to supply energy-from-waste plants of
third parties. Some of the rates are at levels that will
be untenable in the long term. We are negotiating with
Van Gansewinkel
2011
2010
4,956
4,426
883
859
121
114
60
42
Number of FTE
Business developments
The acquisition of Veolia in Belgium (annual revenue of
approximately 100 million) represented an important
step towards the implementation of Van Gansewinkels
strategy for growth. The acquisition gave the company
an additional 450 employees, 140 vehicles and 13,000
customers. The integration is running smoothly and
according to plan. The takeover was finalised in August
2011, and by 1 November the first division had already
been fully integrated.
In the north of France, Van Gansewinkel strengthened
its position by acquiring Del Rosso, near Valenciennes.
That collection business realised an annual revenue of
around 1 million. We currently conduct our operations in Northern France from three locations, and have
a solid network in the departments in which we operate.
Here, too, our proposition of Waste No More is a success. We might be a small player, but we are already
standing out.
Van Gansewinkel gave further shape to various costcutting and efficiency programmes in 2011. We made
good progress with the implementation of computerised
planning systems and onboard computers in our vehicles. All the processes - including timesheets and order
processing - can be handled using the onboard computers. The system is linked to the front office, the back
office and the planning system. We are a pioneer in the
25
21%
17%
15%
16%
10%
5%
C
co om
m m
bu er
s ci
w tibl al
as e
te
0%
us
do ste
r
a a
az w
l
pa
ci ste
i
un wa
Goals
As stated in the companys strategy, Van Gansewinkel
seeks to turn its strong proposition of Waste No More
and further quality improvements into organic growth.
The company also wishes to grow as a supplier of raw
materials. Van Gansewinkel predicts structurally high
prices for raw materials in the long term, caused by the
global scarcity. This presents an interesting business
case for Van Gansewinkel. We want to market our raw
materials even better, by bringing the materials coming
into our hands up to specification and supplying them
to our customers directly. We will develop take back
systems for end products with more and more customers, to create closed cycles.
Recycling
Maltha
Maltha leads the market for glass recycling in the Benelux, with a volume of 300 ktons in the Netherlands and
170 ktons in Belgium. In Europe, Maltha occupies a position among the Top 3. Maltha operates in a fragmented
European market, where competition per country varies
from a few businesses to more than twenty. This presents
opportunities for consolidation in the European glass recycling sector, a development in which Maltha intends
to play a part. Maltha is continually on the lookout for
opportunities in other countries, particularly in Central
and Eastern Europe, where the glass market is developing strongly and a large selling market is forecast.
26
tiatives in various countries aimed at stimulating recycling activities present opportunities for Coolrec.
The company is optimising its capacity in the Benelux
(through operational excellence and by investing in innovative recycling technology) and intends to expand
its capacity outside the Benelux by deploying operations
in new markets.
Activities
Coolrec, Maltha and Van Gansewinkel Minerals give
waste a second life in the form of raw materials. Coolrec specialises in recycling combinations of metal and
plastics, such as from electrical appliances and ICT
equipment. Maltha specialises in glass recycling. Van
Gansewinkel Groep holds a 67% interest in Maltha; the
remaining shares are owned by glass manufacturer
Owens-Illinois (O-I). Van Gansewinkel Minerals specialises in soil decontamination and remediation, and
converts selected waste substances into secondary raw
materials, which are sold under the name of FORZ.
Market position
Coolrec
With a volume of 99 ktons, Coolrec is the market leader
in the Benelux in recycling electrical appliances and
other combinations of metal and plastic. In Europe,
Coolrec occupies a position among the Top 3. The expected wave of consolidations in Europe and the ini-
27
Market developments
The worldwide focus on the scarcity of raw materials
continued to increase in 2011. In part because of this,
prices for primary raw materials remained high, despite
the crisis. This is a significant change from the crisis
years of 2008 and 2009, when prices for raw materials
dropped sharply and the recycling industry came under
a lot of pressure. This proves the added value of converting waste into secondary raw materials. More and
more often, it is becoming financially more attractive
to use secondary raw materials rather than primary,
natural materials.
As a consequence, Van Gansewinkel Groeps recycling
businesses saw the demand for recycled raw materials rise. More and more producers are designing their
processes for the use secondary raw materials. That is a
positive development for the recycling sector: it means
more sales channels. At the same time, it puts prices
under pressure at the front end, as a result of the increasing demand for volumes from market operators.
Recycling businesses have to put more effort into obtaining waste streams that can be used for recycling.
In this scenario, Van Gansewinkel Groep profits from
its integrated supply chain approach.
Coolrec profited in particular from the high prices for
non-ferros (e.g. aluminium and copper) and plastics in
2011. Maltha saw the demand from the market for cullet
as a raw material for producing glass rise further. Using
cullet in the production process results in a reduction in
energy compared with the use of primary raw materials. The glass and bottling industries are using cullet
more and more often, for both economic and ecological
28
Goals
Van Gansewinkel Groep seeks to grow in the recycling
sector and will continue to invest in innovation and
cost leadership. The opportunities for investment are
increasing in the recycling market, matching the demand from producers for recycled raw materials made
to specification. To ensure a structured response to
these opportunities and possibilities, we commissioned
consultancy firm Roland Berger to conduct a study. Roland Bergers report largely confirms our views of the
market. That is good: we have taken the right course
and we now know where the principal opportunities
for growth are. The priorities and criteria for Recycling
will be defined in 2012.
Recycling
2010
Number of FTE
465
427
142
109
22
17
29
AVR
Activities
Geographically, AVRs locations in Rozenburg and Duiven are situated well, close to major cities that require
heat and near industrial businesses that need steam for
their processes. These possibilities have not yet been
fully utilised. AVR can supply more towns and businesses with heat.
Market position
AVR is the market leader in the Netherlands, with the
capacity to process 1.82 million tons. The energy-fromwaste plant in Rozenburg is one of the largest in the
world, with a capacity of 1.27 million tons. Producing
more than 500,000 MWh of green electricity from
30
Market developments
The processing market in the Netherlands is suffering
from overcapacity. The shortage of combustible waste
was approximately 0.7-1.0 million tons in 2011. In response, the market took a number of important measures to import waste from abroad. The first large foreign volumes from Great Britain in particular were
AVR
2011
2010
Number of FTE
414
450
242
277
109
130
34
27
17%
13%
20%
Business developments
AVRs power plants operated with greater stability and
efficiency in 2011 than in the year before. AVR Rozenburg converted more residual waste into energy using
fewer workers, and AVR Duiven achieved a number of
production records. Under the motto of lean management, all actions and processes within the organisation
were coordinated as closely as possible.
25%
24%
AVR
Attero
AEB
HVC
Smaller competitors
31
AVR Rozenburg
Energy yield (in %)
60
60
23
40
34
6
7
20
24
The Water Processing Plant in Rozenburg (for processing polluted water) performed better in 2011 than the
year before. On the one hand the demand for its processing activities increased, while on the other the
plants costs were further lowered by, among other factors, a decrease in the volume of gas used.
21
13
z
20 enb
09 ur
Ro
go ze
al nb
20 ur
15 g
Ro
Steam
Goals
Heat
Electricity
1,573
2012
1,393 89
Capaciteitbenutting
Energy from Waste - HS
1,323 85
2013
1,224
80
1,536
2014
1,206
78
1,555
2015
1,185
76
1,555
2011
2016
1,145
74
1,555
2017
1,162
75
1,555
2018
1,158
74
1,555
2019
1,183
938
2020
0
32
1,565
500
76
Steam Pipe
AVR will supply steam to nearby businesses in Rotterdams Botlek area, which will help preserve fossil fuels
and reduce CO2 emissions. AVR signed the contract for
these supplies with its partners Stedin (grid operator) and chemical company and steam user Emerald
Kamala Chemical (EKC) on 15 February 2012, officially
giving the go-ahead for the construction of a steam
grid in Rotterdams Botlek. Plans to build a steam grid
have existed for years, and now matters have developed
sufficiently to allow Stedin to start work on the grid. The
purpose of the steam grid is to transport steam from
AVR Rozenburg to surrounding factories that need the
steam for their production processes. At present, those
factories generate steam using their own boilers, which
are mostly fired using fossil fuels. Once they are connected to the heat grid, businesses will be able to make
optimum use of each others production facilities and
as a result substantially cut costs in the supply chain.
The steam grid will also help achieve considerable
reductions in CO2 emissions and improve the quality of
the air. Supplying steam to EKC alone will result in a
CO2 reduction of 70,000-100,000 tons per year.
1,555
60
1,000
AVR will continue to implement operational improvements. This year, the company will also invest in a
space on the Rozenburg site where residual waste can
be brought up to specification. The separate residual
waste streams can be combined in such a manner that
they form the best possible fuel for our energy-fromwaste plants. This will mean a direct positive contribution to the energy management system.
1,555
1,500
2,000
33
International
France
Poland
Van Gansewinkel Groep is internationally oriented and outside the Benelux also has branches in
France, Germany, Portugal, the Czech Republic,
Poland and Hungary. However, in countries where
Van Gansewinkel Groep does not have branches
of its own, customers are also offered assistance
with waste services on location, organisation and
implementation of international take-back systems
and the related reclamation of raw materials.
34
Hungary
In the autumn of 2008, Maltha acquired Hungarian
glass recycling business Humn Szerviz, giving Van
Gansewinkel Groep a foothold in Hungary. From its
base in Hungary, Maltha intends to sell increasing volumes of cullet to glass manufacturers in Central and
Eastern Europe.
Portugal
Maltha has had operations in Portugal for over fifteen
years. Its location at the centre of the country yields
around 220,000 tons of clean glass fragments every year
Only 10% of the waste in the Czech Republic is incinerated and converted into energy. The very low incineration capacity means that large quantities of waste still
have to be taken to landfills. Van Gansewinkel Groep
intends to continue investing in recycling facilities in
the Czech Republic.
Germany
Coolrec has also been conducting recycling activities in
Germany since 2009. Early in 2012, those activities expanded considerably with the acquisition of RDE GmbH.
RDE stands for Rcknahmen, Demontage, ElektronikRecycling. Since 1991, this company has been specialising in collecting, sorting and disassembling all kinds of
electrical appliances and electronics (WEEE). It has two
branches near Cologne and Kaiserslautern.
Czech Republic
Van Gansewinkel Groep has had activities in the Czech
Republic since the mid-1990s, operating as a waste service provider and a supplier of raw materials. Working
from five locations, the company collects household and
commercial waste, and separates paper, glass, plastics
and drink containers. These flows are processed to
create new raw materials. Van Gansewinkel also offers services in the area of water purification, public
lighting and urban cleaning in the Czech Republic. Van
Gansewinkel Czech Republic collects the waste of more
than 2,500 businesses and several tens of thousands
of households. The business also provides the logistics
services for the Czech light bulb return system and
other collective return systems.
In the Czech Republic, Van Gansewinkel Groep has a
majority shareholding in Petka CZ, a business that every year processes more than 4,000 tons of PET bottles
(containers for soft drinks and other liquids) into PET
flakes, as they are called. This raw material is supplied
to the thread industry, manufacturers of PET binding
tape, PET foil for the production of foodstuff packaging
and other applications. Petka CZ exports approximately
30% of its output to Germany and the Netherlands.
35
Organisation .
and formalisation
of sustainable
development
Organisation of sustainable
development
Sustainable development is an issue that has the attention of the entire Board of Directors. Final responsibility lies with the Chairman of the Board, Ruud Sondag.
The Board of Directors defines the vision and strategy
for the whole organisation. Since sustainability is an
integral part of our business case, the Board of Directors focuses not only on financial targets, but on nonfinancial targets too (see page 44 and 129).
The shareholders support our vision of and approach
to sustainable development. For example, major shareholder KKR seeks to improve the sustainable development results of the businesses in which it invest, and
to that end works together with the Environmental Defence Fund. It is convinced that a better environment
can go hand in hand with economic gains and will
contribute to the long-term development of businesses.
Van Gansewinkel Groep is a partner in this Green
Portfolio Program. In 2010, together with KKR two
KPIs were defined. Those KPIs are maximised energy
yields at the energy-from-waste plants and a reduction in CO2 emissions by more efficient collection. The
results are presented in the chapter entitled Planet
(see page 53).
36
It is Van Gansewinkel Groeps firm belief that it is impossible to create value without respecting values. In
everything we do, we seek to comply with applicable
laws and regulations, to make our compliance visible
and transparent and to go about our business with integrity. That is why our policy principles and core values (see page 15) and the principles of the UN Global
Compact serve as the point of departure, for how we
want all our people to conduct themselves. This is how
we safeguard our standards and values: for our employees, our customers, our suppliers, our shareholders and
the world around us.
Policy principles
The first two principles of the Global Compact are taken directly from the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights. Businesses should:
1. Support and respect the protection of internationally
proclaimed human rights
2. M ake sure that they are not complicit in human
rights abuses
The next four principles are taken from the International Labour Organisations Declaration on Fundamental
Principles and Rights at Work. Businesses should:
3. Uphold the freedom of association and the effective
recognition of the right to collective bargaining
4. Eliminate all forms of forced and compulsory labour
5. Abolish child labour effectively
6. Eliminate discrimination in respect of employment
and occupation
The next three principles are taken from Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Businesses
should:
7. Support a precautionary approach to environmental
challenges
8. Undertake initiatives to promote greater environmental responsibility
9. Encourage the development and diffusion of environmentally friendly technologies
The final principle is taken from the United Nations
Convention against Corruption:
10. Businesses should work against corruption in all its
forms, including extortion and bribery
UN Global Compact
In 2011, Van Gansewinkel Groep adopted the principles of the Global Compact of the United Nations. Global
Compact is an initiative of the United Nations that was
established in 2000 to connect businesses, UN organisations, unions and social organisations. The Global
Compact comprises ten principles in the areas of human rights, labour, the environment and anti-corruption. For Van Gansewinkel Groep, the ten principles
offer a framework for further formalising sustainable
development as an element of our activities. From 2012
forward, we will report on the results in respect of the
ten principles.
37
People
People
Results People
Key objective
Indicator
2010
2011
Craftsmanship
with passion
Staff turnover
14.0%
10.9%
10.0%
7.4
-*
7.4
1.4%
1.5%
1.8%
11
7.5
Severity rate
0.24
0.19
0.15
Absence rate
5.4%
5.1%
4.9%
Employee motivation
Training efforts
Creation of a safe
and healthy working
environment
Injury frequency
Number of employees**
Fatal accidents
6,435
617
Average number of
temporary workers
Training efforts
4.5
0
Injury frequency
1,061
Staff turnover
-27
114 fte
million
%
0,6 million
%
4%
10.9
%
3.1%
*** E
Employees
motivation
is measured
biannually
using
the Employee
Motivation
mployees motivation
is measured
biannually
using the
Employee
Motivation
Survey. Survey. The average score in 2010 was 7.4 out of 10. The next survey will be conducted in 2012.
** With
exception
number
of employees,
the
key figures
relating to
The average
scoreto
inthe
2010
was 7.4 out
of 10. The next
survey
will be conducted
in People
2012. do not include the performances of the acquired Veolia Belgium in 2011.
38
** With exception to the number of employees, the key figures relating to People do not
include the performances of the acquired Veolia Belgium in 2011.
39
People
40
Employee motivation
Every two years since 2008, Van Gansewinkel Groep
has conducted an Employee Motivation Survey (EMS).
The surveys show how the company manifests itself in
ever-changing circumstances and provides information
about areas that require more adjustment.
The results of the EMS conducted late in 2010 showed
that the general level of satisfaction with our work
scored 7.4 out of 10. Willingness to help out colleagues
scored highest, with 8.3. Opportunities for development, working conditions and follow-up on measures
in response to the 2008 EMS scored lowest.
In response, the managing boards of all the groups
divisions and regions set about developing plans for improvement, which they drafted during 2011 with input
from the local works councils. Parts of those plans were
already implemented in 2011; implementation will be
completed during 2012. Wherever possible, the actions
incorporate the centrally defined priorities: 1) organisation, 2) opportunities for development and 3) working
conditions.
A number of actions have been set up and implemented in response to the results, as illustrated by these
examples:
41
People-oriented leadership and encouraging and motivating staff to be able to carry out their duties properly and continue their development are the central
elements of our Management Development policy. This
calls for self-awareness, vision and the ability to inspire and guide others in the transition to becoming
a supplier of raw materials. We have five management
development programmes for education & development
of talented young staff and management. Together with
the initial programmes, they form the backbone of our
MD policy.
Management trainees and Young Potentials:
talented young people are often a source of new,
fresh ideas and understanding. That is why, for
more than ten years, Van Gansewinkel Groep has
offered a programme for trainees & Young Potentials. Management trainees are recent graduates.
Young Potentials are young people who have been
working for the company for a short while, people
in whom the company sees management potential.
The management trainees spend two years becoming familiar with the various divisions and follow
an extensive practical training programme, that the
Young Potentials also follow. They receive intensive
coaching to develop their talents. The programme
that began in 2010 ends in 2012. A new Traineeship
and Young Potential programme will start then
Management development Top 200: A leadership
programme was launched in November 2011. The
training programme focuses, on the one hand,
on the mutual relationships and development of
competencies of management and, on the other, on
a series of eleven themes for further defining the
strategy. The twelve groups corresponding to the
eleven themes will present their findings at the
management meeting at the end of 2012
Costs of training
We spent a total of 4.5 million on courses and education in 2011. This represents 1.5% of the total payroll,
42
and is more than the target of 1.4% set for 2011. It is our
intention to further raise our training efforts to 1.8%
of the payroll in 2012, an increase of 25% compared
with 2010. Since the proportion of mandatory courses
is stable, most of this additional investment will have
to be spent on non-mandatory courses. This substantial
additional decentralised investment should serve to improve the EMS score for opportunities for development.
This reflects how Van Gansewinkel Groep invests in the
professionalism of its people and in creating a working
environment in which people can fully develop their
talents.
Two of them have already completed the course to become drivers. We hope to increase the intensity of our
partnerships with the Employee Insurance Agency and
other organisations in order to widen the scope of the
social-return aspect. We do this as a reflection of our
responsibility, but also, and in particular, to address
the issue of the future demand for employees at Van
Gansewinkel Public Services, for example.
At Van Gansewinkel Groep, diversity is aimed at optimum and sustainable employability and productivity of
all its employees and the external parties involved with
our organisation. Our emphasis is not on eliminating
underrepresentation of certain groups (= minorities policy) but on making the best possible use of all the potential and talent available within society. The defining
qualities and talents that an individual brings to the
table as a human being are why we want a particular
person in a particular job or position. Diversity is not a
goal in and of itself, but rather a tool for achieving lasting results for the organisation and society as a whole.
Social return
Male/female diversity
We work together with reintegration agencies and contractors to make arrangements about jobs, on-the-job
training and work placements for people without immediate access to the job market.
Van Gansewinkel Groep had operations in nine European countries in 2011. Besides the 6,027 employees (not
including Veolia Belgium), an average of 1,061 FTEs
from temporary employment agencies worked for the
company over the course of the year.
Diversity
Last year 4,943 men and 1,084 women worked for Van
Gansewinkel Groep based on fixed-term or permanent
employment contracts. The corresponding figures for
2010 were 4,846 men and 972 women. This means
that the change in the proportions during 2011 was
minimal.
Male/female diversity in management
Management (members of the Board of Directors, directors of the central support departments and regional
management teams) of Van Gansewinkel Groep comprises mostly men. The group of staff reporting directly
to members of the Board of Directors is made up of 33
men and 1 woman. The Top 200, as it is commonly
known, consists of 161 men and 20 women.
43
New employees
The workforce increased from 5,818 to 6,027 employees (not including Veolia Belgium and temporary employees) in 2011. We have made structural investments
in expertise by providing training and hiring people
whose profile suits our transformation to a supplier of
raw materials and energy.
Staff turnover
Netherlands
% women
Belgium/Luxembourg**
% women
CEE
2010
2009
3,943
65%
3,897
67%
4,060
72%
21%
1,182
20%
1,112
18%
10%
587
10%
490
8%
3%
152
3%
118
2%
100%
5,818
100%
5,780
100%
15.6
1,278
20.8
630
% women
16.3
% women
39.2
Other
176
Total
6,027
% women
17.6
Employee participation
Van Gansewinkel Groep encourages employee participation, and for that purpose actively seeks out the
dialogue with its employees and representatives (employee participation councils and unions). We believe
that cooperation with those councils and unions is a
very important factor in realising our mutual goals.
The way in which employee participation has been
given shape reflects the decentralised business model
fostered by our group: participation where the actual
work takes place: at the separate companies. Almost
every division has its own works council. Group Works
Councils for Collection, Recycling and Processing also
exist, as well as a Central Works Council. Each works
council has a SHWE (Safety, Health, Welfare and Environment) committee, as required by the Dutch Working
Conditions Act (Arbowet). In all, 121 and 12 employees,
respectively, were active in the various Dutch and Belgian works councils.
Full-time
% women
% women
Total
2011
2010
2009
5,291
88%
5,062
87%
5,103
88%
12%
756
13%
677
12%
100%
5,818
100%
5,780
100%
11.3
736
Part-time
65.0
6,027
2010
2009
Male
4,943
82%
4,846
83%
4,826
83%
Female
1,084
18%
972
17%
954
17%
Total
6,027
100%
5,818
100%
5,780
100%
2010
2009
245
235
225
ages 25-35
1,269
1,332
1,218
ages 35-45
1,918
1,937
1,898
ages 45-55
1,774
1,659
1,672
820
655
767
ages <25
ages >55
44
2011
** 408 FTE of the acquired Veolia Belgium are not included in the summaries.
45
Report of the
Central .
Works Council
Committees
The Council has a committee for strategy (STRACO)
and a social committee (SOCO), and is assisted by a
committee for Safety, Health, Welfare and Environment
(SHWE), which is made up of employee representatives
working in the field.
It is also assisted by an administrative secretary and,
where it deems such to be necessary, seeks assistance
from external sources. The Council makes use of training opportunities every year.
The Council meets with CEO Ruud Sondag, the member of the Board of Directors responsible for matters
relating to the Dutch Works Councils Act. No threshold
exists for matters concerning the company that may be
discussed at these meetings. Topics addressed at these
meetings include closure of divisions, acquisitions of
companies or operations, the companys strategic plan,
how the company is financed, the possibilities (or lack
of possibilities) for reorganisation, the introduction of
schemes and facilities and business at the company on
a monthly basis (both financial figures and reports on
matters such as safety at work and absenteeism). Six
formal meetings were conducted between the Council
and the Director in 2011.
46
greater engagement and satisfaction on the part of employees, which in turn can help lead to higher returns.
The Council seeks the best possible balance between
preserving existing values and adding value.
Mission
In 2011, the Council fully stood by its present mission:
The companys continuity must be safeguarded and
the consistency between the separate divisions must be
ensured. The Council will continue to take this mission
as the basis for its deliberations and actions.
For the Central Works Council
Van Gansewinkel Groep
Rob Balfoort
Chairman
47
Safety
0.40
0.35
20
0.30
0.25
15
10
0.20
22.9
0.15
18.2
14.1
5
0
10.8
0.10
7.9
0.05
0.00
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Injury Frequency*
Severity rate**
* Injury Frequency: number of incidents resulting in absence x 1,000,000
divided by Hours of exposure. The frequency rate refers to employees
and hired staff.
** S
everity rate: number of days lost x 1,000 divided by the hours of exposure. The severity rate relates to employees and hired staff.
25
20
15
10
5
0
Collection
BE
Collection
NL
Processing
NL
Recyling
* T
he data for Collection BE were supplied by the Belgian Work-Related
Accidents Foundation (Fonds voor arbeidsongevallen), NACE 38.1; for
Collection NL and Processing NL by the Dutch Waste Management Association (Vereniging van afvalbedrijven); and for Recycling by the Belgian
Work-Related Accidents Foundation, NACE 38.3
35
30
* The findings presented above have been taken from a Belgian study of figures
for 2009 conducted by Preventie en Interim (PI): www.p-i.be/nl/
48
49
Accident pyramid
Prevention
Fatalities
First-aid cases
Near misses
50
Targets (levels of ambition) have been defined for several of the categories identified. This shows whether
our accident pyramid is a healthy one. The results for
2011 were as follows:
Number of recordables compared with number of
total recordable cases: 3, target was also 3
Number of first-aid cases compared with number of
lost time injuries: 4.3, target was 10
Number of near misses compared with number of
total recordable cases: 33, target was 50
The results show that the accident pyramid is statistically unhealthy. Too few first-aid cases and near misses are reported. We feel that this is sufficient cause to
take steps. This issue was discussed during the Top
200 management, and local initiatives have been taken
to better record first-aid cases and to further lower the
threshold for reporting near misses.
Absence
51
Planet
Planet
Results Planet
Key objective
Indicator
2010
2011
Waste continues to
be a raw material
Second life
56.7%
58.1%
58.5%
Reduced ecological
footprint
1.17 mtons
1.22 mtons
1.25 mtons
23.1%
22.4%
23.1%
15
Energy efficiency
Increase in high-quality
recycling
58.1
%
1.4%
Households supplied
with energy
10,000
1.22
million
+ 0.7 million
200,000
52
Kilometres avoided
road transport
19.4
mtons
0.05 mtons
Electricity supplied
to the grid
1.2%
694
GWh
6%
53
Planet
Van Gansewinkel Groep works together with customers and partners to give waste a second life in
the form of raw materials and (green) energy. This
reduces the amount of primary materials used and
the emissions of CO2: using smart methods to reclaim raw materials almost by definition results in
less use of (fossil) energy and as such in lower CO2
emissions. The constant development of waste into
raw materials and renewable energy is, we feel,
our greatest contribution to a better environment
and a more sustainable society.
54
7.9
9.2
9.4
14.6
13.5
13.7
19.4
20.6
20.4
58.1
56.7
56.5
2011
2010
2009
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1.3%
34.6%
9.6%
1.4%
0.7%
7.4%
6.2%
1.1%
14.0%
5.5%
8.2%
Combustible
Building & construction
Hazardous
Glass
Electrical & electronic
Wood
Paper
Plastics
Ferrous
Minerals
Other
55
56
Energy efficiency
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
in
er
th
O
s
ro
u
M
Fe
r
s
ic
st
a
l
r
Pa
pe
oo
W
&
E
el lec
ec tr
tr ica
on l
ic
la
ss
G
le
co B
ns u
tr ild
uc in
ti g
H on
az
ar
do
us
er
al
s
10
st
ib
&
Flatscreens televisions were taken apart manually and analysed to determine how best to recycle
them. An important factor in this process is that
flatscreen televisions contain mercury and need to
be processed differently from televisions containing
cathode ray tubes. Material analyses show that the
recycled metals and plastics do not contain mercury.
Air quality measurements and six-weekly inspections
of the workers health show that the recycling method
used does not present any dangers to the health of
our employees
The possibilities for best extracting the scarce precious metals from the flatscreen televisions were
examined, in partnership with Umicore
By way of a test, the plastic from CRT televisions
was used to manufacture 150 plastic backs for new
flatscreen televisions
Method of processing
bu
Co
m
The focus at AVR in the coming years will be on improving the energy yield. We seek to extract even more
energy from waste by supplying district heating to individuals and process steam to nearby businesses (see
page 33). To achieve this, the business previously commenced work on distributing heat to Rotterdam-Zuid
via a new heat grid. This project is scheduled for completion mid-2013. The ambition for 2012 is the same as
for 2011.
Other
Productieschema
afvalenergiecentrales
Input
- Output energy-from-waste
plants
Heat (TJ)
Duiven*
569 ktons
Total
1,296
1,900
ktons
Rozenburg**
1,331 ktons
516
Metals (ktons)
32
Electricity (GWh)
879.5
57
58
Cleaner transport
For example, we think about alternative modes of transport for collecting and transporting waste and raw materials, and we closely follow external developments.
The test using Shells clean GTL fuel is an example.
Waterborne transport
Tonnage (ktons)
Journeys prevented (n)
Road transport prevented (millions of km)
Wherever possible, Van Gansewinkel Groep uses waterborne transport as an alternative to road transport. In
total, we shipped more than 900,000 tons of material
by water in 2011. On the one hand, within The Netherlands, we ship household and industrial waste to the
energy-from-waste plant in Rozenburg, for example
from our transfer stations in Utrecht, The Hague and
Rotterdam. On the other, Maltha frequently makes use
of ship-based transport for moving cullet. The cullet is
shipped all across Europe, from the Netherlands and
Belgium to Hungary. By using ship-based transport,
we cut the number of journeys by lorry by more than
41,000, representing seven million kilometres of road
transport, which means a considerable reduction of the
burden on the European road network. We also imported household and industrial waste from England and
Ireland in 2011, and transported it by ship, using the
services of external transport companies. The kilometres sailed for these journeys are not included in the
calculation of the results.
A small number of new vehicles were taken into use in
2011. As a consequence, the average age of the vehicles
rose to eight years in 2011 (7.58 years in 2010). All
newly purchased lorries are compliant with European
Standard 5/EEV standard.
After Rotterdam and Schiphol, in 2011 Van Gansewinkel Groep started using 100% electric vehicles for collecting industrial waste in the town centres of The
Hague, Groningen and Zutphen in the Netherlands
and Mechelen. The waste that is collected is taken to
an energy-from-waste plant and converted into electricity, which is then used to power the electric collection
trucks. The soundless vehicles have a top speed of 40
km/h and have extra optical and audio signals.
Route optimisation
2011
2010
2009
992
930
810
41,327
35,225
33,322
7.0
6.3
5.9
1,037
7.68
582
7.49
France
27
5.25
Poland
99
13.79
Czech Republic
76
9.75
1,821
8.00
Netherlands
Belgium and Luxembourg
Total
2010
2009
2008
7%
10%
13%
11%
EURO 2
25%
27%
28%
34%
EURO 3+4
34%
32%
31%
41%
EURO 5 + EEV
28%
26%
24%
14%
6%
5%
4%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
EURO 0+1
Other*
Total
* Other includes vehicles that do not fall under the EURO classification, for example the electric vehicles.
CO2
emission,
average per vehicle
Kilometres
Fuel (litres)
Average
consumption
(km/litre)
Netherlands
37,845,994
15,028,701
2.52
47,115
45.43
Belgium
19,424,397
8,020,645
2.42
25,145
43.5
1,021,750
406,437
2.51
1,274
41.1
58,292,141
23,455,783
2.49
73,534
44.67
France/Luxembourg
Total
* T
he calculations of the CO2 emissions are based on the general goods transport conversion factors in the CO2 Performance Ladder. Van Gansewinkel Groeps fleet
runs exclusively on diesel fuel. The conversion factor that applies is 3.135 grams of CO2/litre of fuel.
59
an average of 10%. This translates as 21 fewer vehicles on the road every day. For skip and roll-on roll-of
containers, the mileage dropped by 3.4% in the Netherlands and 0.6% in Belgium. In addition, the optimisation
means that more skip and roll-on roll-of containers trips
were made by our own vehicles, resulting in a reduction
in the transports outsourced. The number of kilograms
of waste transported per kilometre has improved, causing a reduction in the CO2 emission per ton of waste
transported.
Research by TNO shows that Coolrecs recycling activities prevent the emission of more than 40,000 tons
of CO2 every year. To illustrate what this means, this
translates as driving 270 million kilometres by road in
an average car. Preventing harmful propellants such as
CFCs also has a significant impact on the environment.
By recycling a million refrigerators, we prevent approximately 181,000 kg of propellants from being released
into the environment each year. This corresponds to
the emission of almost 550,000 tons of CO2.
Electricity used
CO2 emissions from energy-from-waste plants (based on CO2 measurements) in 2011* (ktons)
By far the majority of the Groups waste water is produced by the two energy-from-waste plants in Rozenburg
and Duiven and the activities of Van Gansewinkel Minerals. The volume is the same as the average water pollution caused by 3,800 Dutch individuals during a year.
The waste water from the remaining Van Gansewinkel
Groep activities is insignificant and comprises less than
5% of the volumes listed in the table on page 61.
* The CO2 emissions are measured according to NEN 14181 for all locations. In the Netherlands, the proportion of biogenous emissions in the production of energy
from waste in the Netherlands is 51% - Source: Netherlands Government Gazette, No. 19585, p. 51- (= short-cycle emissions). The remainder consists of long-cycle
CO2 with fossil origins. The CO2 emissions prevented are calculated based on the formula agreed upon by the sector and the competent authorities. That formula is
based on the IPCC method.
2011
2010
2009
724
672
651
3,740
4,220
4,000
Average emission
138
151
151
Number of vehicles
(g/km)
A/B labels in NL
66%
47%
37%
Emissions
Rozenburg
Duiven
AVI
BEC
AVI
TCI
Total
Particulate
matter
1.1
0.2
0.3
0.2
1.8
SO2
1.3
7.8
19.4
1.9
30.5
CO
270.5
22.7
32.7
5.7
331.7
NOx
331.4
48.5
121.2
48.3
549.5
2011
2010
2009
28
21.6
19
Total BE
9.5
7.6
8.5
3.6
* The relatively large increase in the amount of electricity used can be explained by the increase in the
activities and the improvements in reporting.
Rozenburg
Duiven
2011
Rozenburg
Duiven
2010
Short-cycle (biogenous)
741
359
1,100
919
254
1,173
Long-cycle (fossil)
560
245
805
583
161
744
1,302
604
1,906
1,502
415
1,917
392
131
523
373
118
491
Emissions of CO2
CO2 emissions prevented
Waterborne emissions
2011
2010
Rozenburg
Duiven
Minerals
Rozenburg
Duiven
Minerals
1010
301
791
1060
329
131
38
34
45
44
37
3.9
3.5
12.4
4.5
6.1
19
142
166
Location
Biodiversity
60
61
surrounding areas are negligible. None of the environmental permits for any of the sites stipulate restrictions
that have a measurable influence on our operations.
Environmental costs
62
Profit
Environmental incidents
Last year, Van Gansewinkel Groeps activities led to
environmental incidents on 290 occasions. Of those
incidents, 143 concerned discharges into the air. Most
of those cases took place at the energy-from-waste stations, and primarily involved the carbon monoxide
emission standards being exceeded. A further 96 incidents involved discharges into the ground, including
primarily oil spills. A few times this involved several
hundreds of litres. Discharges into water occurred on
32 occasions. Once this involved a discharge of around
100 litres of oil into the surface water. Other types of incidents occurred on 25 occasions, for example excessive
levels of dust and odours. In addition, fires occurred 79
times in 2011. Our own staff were able to put out 52 of
those fires. The fire services were needed on 27 occasions. None of the fires caused any appreciable damage.
All environmental incidents are reported and recorded
in a central database, and the measures to be taken are
strictly adhered to in the environmental care system.
Profit
Results Profit
Key objective
Indicator
Long-term partnerships
with customers
2010
2011
EBITDAE margin
22%
21%
21%
Return on capital
employed
(ROCE)
3%
4%
6%
Customer satisfaction
8.2
8.2
8.2
Capex
Revenue
1,186
million
102 254
26 million
Equity
-25
million
3 million
million
million
71 million
Net result
EBITDAE
5 million
Operational cash flow
162
million
8 million
233
million
3 million
63
Profit
64
Efficiency measures
Van Gansewinkel Groep launched an efficiency programme throughout the entire Group in 2010, under
the motto Fit for the Future. That programme is aimed
at achieving structural quality improvements and a
stronger starting position for further growth. In 2011,
the Fit for the Future programme had a positive impact
of 46 million on EBITDAE compared with 2010. The
programme will be continued in 2012.
Bank covenants
2011
2010
1,186
1,115
59
50
254
249
21%
22%
Net result
-25
-22
Equity
162
154
233
230
-48
86
102
76
Repayments on borrowings
-107
-83
132
180
Revenue
Operating profit/(loss)
EBITDAE
EBITDAE margin
65
Customer satisfaction
At least once every year, 10,000 Van Gansewinkel customers in the Netherlands and Belgium are invited to
participate in the red and green cards programme
and say what they think of our services. This programme, which was introduced in 2008, uses a specially designed website on which customers can give
us a green card (satisfied) or a red card (dissatisfied).
With this system, Van Gansewinkel continually and
proactively works to identify complaints and possible
improvements. In addition to the red and green cards
programme, Van Gansewinkel also conducts large-scale
customer satisfaction surveys every year.
In 2011, our customers proved to be very happy with us
again, as reflected in a score of 8.2 out of 10. Our complaints procedures and value for money, which are both
very important aspects of our customers perception of
us, scored better compared with 2010. The specific improvements in the area of complaints management, including the introduction of a customer service desk and
66
From the
CFO
Opportunities seized
Van Gansewinkel Groep seized whatever opportunities
presented themselves in this uneasy market, De Fluiter
Balledux explains. For example, in the spring of 2011,
we came to an agreement with our financiers about
amending our financing conditions, at a time when the
mood on the financial markets was, briefly, optimistic.
Financial targets
It is Van Gansewinkel Groeps goal to achieve annual
EBITDAE increases, organic growth in revenue and
growth through acquisitions. The company also works
to realise a robust cash flow and reduce its debt position further.
Van Gansewinkel Groep has defined two key financial objectives for 2012. The company targets a stable
EBITDAE margin of 22%, In addition, Van Gansewinkel
Groep targets a 6% return on capital employed (ROCE),
compared with 4% in 2011.
Van Gansewinkel Groep improved its financial position, made a strategically important acquisition
in Belgium and exceeded the targets of the Fit for
the Future efficiency and quality programme. At
the same time, however, the results were adversely affected by pressure on prices. At Collection &
Services, in particular, prices eroded more than
expected. Considering the difficult market conditions, I am pleased with our performances in 2011,
says Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Rob de Fluiter
Balledux.
The first six months of the year looked promising. The
economy grew, industrial production increased and
prices for raw materials rose. During the year, however,
that recovery proved to be very fragile. When the concerns about Greece emerged, the mood changed abruptly. The last six months of the year were characterised
by a great deal of uneasiness on the financial markets,
which in turn impacted the economic developments.
Van Gansewinkel Groep knew that 2011 would be a
challenging year. When the year began, we already
67
The cash flow decreased as a result of the new financing conditions, on the one hand because of non-recurring expenses and on the other because of the higher
interest charges. At the same time, though, our operating capital improved again and we did not exceed the
predefined targets for capital investment. Our cash flow
is still what makes this company strong.
68
69
Stakeholder dialogue
Customers
Social activities
and sponsorship
(s
CA
TI
t
ofi
Pr
Raw ma
ter
ial
s
NT
IFI
IDE
TS
SUL
RE
ON
TI
UA
ACTION
rs
ees
y
o
pl
EV
AL
S
SI
LY
70
Media
Su
p
p
lie
Circular economy
Sustainable services
Sustainable energy
Sustainable procurement
Cleaner driving
Sustainable employability
Safety
Local residents
Suppliers
Media
NGOs
Society
Customers
Issues
Education
Employees
To share knowledge and experiences in order to respond better to specific questions and expectations from our
stakeholders
To better understand trends and developments in society, among our customers and in politics
To have a say in political and social decisions
To solve problems, create support and generate trust
AN
A
Education and
research
institutes
Investors
Shareholders
ECTATIONS
EXP
Supervisory
Board
Su
pp
ly
)
ity
rc
ca
Employee
participation
In addition, in 2011 we again accepted various invitations to give presentations and we participated in discussions and dialogues of others. People want to hear
what we have to say. The theme of raw materials is a
prominent issue on the social and political agenda (see
page 110).
The dialogue with others helps us to add depth and
scope to our vision and generates valuable input for
follow-up processes in separate areas. For example, it
allows us to continually contribute to and help drive
the discussion concerning the concept of a circular
economy and yields valuable input for improving our
annual report.
Governments
and politics
LO
GU
Ba
DIA
ponsibility
res
ain
ch
ERS
OLD
EH
AK
T
S
een People, P
etw
lan
eb
et
nc
,
la
Local residents
NGOs
Investors
Stakeholder dialogue
We communicate with our stakeholders every day, and we involve them in our activities. We see the dialogue with our stakeholders
as a form of supply chain management. We seek to bring across our vision and to identify and assess our stakeholders expectations throughout the entire chain to allow us to improve our activities in that chain.
71
72
Expectation
Employees
Safe working environment, attractive terms of employment, development opportunities, good working climate, open communication.
Customers
Sustainable solutions and customer service for waste and raw materials issues, quality, reliability, competitive prices, customer-friendly and
service-oriented support, fast complaints procedures and exchange of
knowledge relating to waste, raw materials and the environment, including C2C applications.
Investors
Profitability, long- and short-term return (ROI), corporate (social) responsibility, transparency about our activities and results.
Being active in society in the area of sponsorship, partnerships, presentations, involvement in various occasional activities.
NGOs
Media
Suppliers
Possibilities for partnerships, profitability, business and product development in the area of cradle-to-cradle and safety.
Local residents
Ensuring local welfare, compliance with laws and regulations and proactively offering input to prevent problems.
In 2010, Van Gansewinkel Groep started a partnership with the Missing Chapter Foundation of Princess
Laurentien van Oranje-Nassau. The aim of that nonprofit organisation is to bring todays decision-makers
into contact with childrens refreshing and candid
ideas about strategic dilemmas surrounding sustainability. Under the name of Raad van Kinderen (Board
of Children), the foundation links primary schools
to businesses. Van Gansewinkel Groep also has its
own Board of Children: the 8th Montessori School
Zeeburg in Amsterdam. Last year, we talked with them
about our vision of Waste No More and about how Van
Gansewinkel Groep can make sure that producers use
cleaner methods to make their products and that
consumers separate more waste to give it a second
life in the form of raw materials. In 2012, the Board of
Children will meet with some members of the management team to discuss their ideas.
73
Materiality analysis
Van Gansewinkel Groep conducted a materiality analysis. The purpose of that analysis was to determine
whether the information that is relevant to our stakeholders (material topics) is addressed in the report.
Feedback from our stakeholders on the 2010 annual
report indicated that some parts of the report were too
detailed. Rather than wanting to tell everything, we
wish to focus even more closely on the quality of the
reports contents. To achieve this, we first mapped out
what the material topics are. We did this by analysing
Van Gansewinkel Groeps strategy and annual report,
by examining the annual reports of other operators
in our sector, by analysing what is written about Van
74
Position papers
Based on our stakeholder dialogue, we communicated
about the results by publishing them in position papers.
For example, we worked together with De Groene Zaak
to release a position paper about raw materials scarcity,
under the title The profit in shortages. Reports were
drawn up of the findings of the round-table conference
with our suppliers and a site visit by Nudge to AVR
Rozenburg and the resulting discussion about raw materials scarcity.
For more information:
www.vangansewinkelgroep.com/nl/company/position_papers.aspx.
Perfect Days
AVR Rozenburg has introduced the Perfect Days
initiative. A Perfect Day is a day on which the production target is realised, no budgets are exceeded and
no unscheduled downtime or accidents occur. Each
Perfect Day is rewarded with the donation of 100 to
a regional charity. Every month, the total donation for
that month is awarded by lottery to a charity nominated by the sites employees. In 2011, more than 17,400
was donated to various charities.
With this annual report, we hope to give you a transparent description of our organisation. Nevertheless, it is
possible that you would like more information about
particular topics or that you have other views. If you do,
I would like to hear from you.
Frank Janssen
Director Corporate Communication
frank.janssen@vangansewinkel.com
75
Risk management
Van Gansewinkel Groep offers customers highquality solutions for waste and environmental issues. These services are based on an understanding of business processes and the materials used
by customers in various stages of the process of
production and consumption, knowledge of relevant laws and regulations and the ability to offer customers certainty in connection with their
accountability obligations. In this fashion, we lay
a second skin, as it were, over our customers processes. This allows us to give waste a second life
in the form of raw materials or useful applications
such as sustainable energy.
Realising this strategy exposes Van Gansewinkel
Groep to the risks that are an intrinsic part of doing
business. The company strives for a balance between
risks and rewards, and continually assesses where the
risks also offer opportunities. Van Gansewinkel Groep
distinguishes two levels of risk management: strategic business risk management and operational risk
management.
76
Line management
Support
functions
Central
supervision
Risk assurance
External auditors
Risk owners
Risk owner
Monitoring risks
Securing
Business risks
Managing business risks is a process that is realised
by the Board of Directors, Group Management and the
members of the management teams. It is assessed
against the backdrop of the organisations strategy.
The process for managing business risks is designed to
identify potential events that might impact the business
and to control risks to ensure that they remain within
the margins defined for risk tolerance. This system offers the company a reasonable degree of certainty that
the business objectives will be realised. The principal
business risks are:
Price erosion (collection), non-level playing
field (incineration)
77
basic level of utilisation. They can then offer more competitive prices for the remaining tonnage volumes to
achieve a full load. These are characteristics of a nonlevel playing field, which have a negative impact on
pricing in the waste incineration market, where rates
are already under pressure as a result of overcapacity and unfavourable economic conditions. As a consequence, the collection market also faces price erosion.
Van Gansewinkel Groep can compensate for negative
price movements in the collection market by using efficiency measures and by offering extra services. Lack
of volume at the energy-from-waste plants can be compensated by importing waste from other countries. In
addition, the industry association (Vereniging Afvalbedrijven, the Dutch Waste Management Association) is in
negotiation with the government to introduce measures
to reduce the overcapacity.
Van Gansewinkel Groep has concluded long-term contracts that will ensure it of sufficient waste to allow
its two energy-from-waste power plants to operate at
a profit for at least the coming eight years. In addition, with the R1 status of its energy-from-waste power
plants, Van Gansewinkel Groep can import volume
from other countries. Van Gansewinkel Groep has a
flexible layer in the workforce for its other operations,
consisting of temporary employees whose services are
called on to a greater or lesser degree depending on the
78
of capacity. One of the outcomes is an investment programme aimed at improving process control and risk
management. The results in this area are evidenced by
the investment programme for the Energy from Waste
division and the lower insurance premiums for the
business unit in recent years.
For the more distant future, the target is to increase the
supplies of heat to customers under longer-term contracts. This will serve to lessen some of the volatility
associated with the electricity market. To supplement
these control measures, and taking account of an acceptable policy excess, the company is insured for the
risks of damages from fire and machine breakage, repairs for material damage and damages from business
interruption.
Capital structure risks
Market interest
With its ratio of borrowed capital to equity, the company is exposed to changes in market interest rates on
the borrowed capital that is not covered by long-term
hedging. The company has defined a policy for hedging its interest rate risk. That policy and the hedged
position are described in section 8.6.2 of the financial
report.
79
As a waste service provider and supplier of raw materials and energy, Van Gansewinkel Groep operates in the
environmental sector. Parties operating in this sector
are exposed to risks associated with incidents that have
an adverse impact on the environment and that give
rise to costs for remedying the situation. Incidents might
also have a negative effect on Van Gansewinkel Groeps
reputation and good name. Van Gansewinkel Groep has
set up environmental management systems at all its critical businesses and locations. This means that potential
hazards (for example fire) have been identified, the risks
and impact calculated and appropriate control measures
put in place. Each operational entity has trained staff
and has built suitable checks into the process of acceptance and processing. No corners are cut with investments aimed at supporting these control measures. If
an incident as yet occurs, the emergency plans will be
put into action. Our organisations readiness is tested
regularly. The company adopts a proactive central crisis
communication policy in the case of incidents.
Health and safety on the workfloor
Safety comes first in all Van Gansewinkel Groeps activities. To minimise the risks relating to the health and
safety of its employees, the company continually performs risk analyses, in which it assesses the dangers on
the workfloor that present a risk to the health or safety
of its employees. These analyses are performed using
systematic studies that examine the following aspects:
What might cause damage or harm
Whether dangers can be eliminated, and if not
W hat preventative and protective measures have
been taken or should be taken to minimise the
risks?
Riskmatrix
matrix
Risk
Business risks
1
5
Risk level
Operational risks
1
3
A
6
C
3
4
5
6
Operational risks
A Environmental and
reputation risks
B Health and safety on the
workfloor
C Fraud
D Availability of critical
ICT systems
Degree of controllability
80
81
Sustainable
Processing businesses
Depending on the score, a high/medium/low risk profile will be assigned. The criteria for processing businesses are the type of waste processed, the businesss
situation with regard to permits, the system certificates
achieved, whether or not the business processes crossborder waste and the country of final processing business. Depending on the risk profile, we might assess
additional or fewer details relating to compliance with
laws and regulations. Negative reports about our partners also give us cause to take additional steps or to assign a higher risk profile to particular businesses. Our
82
Suppliers
In 2011 we commenced work on a methodology for selecting and assessing (critical) suppliers. That methodology is an extension of the methods used for processing businesses. Suppliers are initially assessed based
on their impact on our primary process, on the risk
they pose for our image and on turnover. A series of
checklists is used to assign each supplier a level per
separate theme. Themes considered in this connection
include compliance with laws and regulations, orderliness and neatness, safety, care system, quality of processes and products and social aspects. These themes
are compared with the guidelines set out in the UN
Global Compact. The Group audits its critical suppliers at least once every three years. Nine audits were
conducted last year.
A procurement board has been set up for the Collection
& Services business unit, to offer assurance with regard
to the separate interests relating to the use of our suppliers within the overall business unit. That board is
made up of a multidisciplinary team of members of the
companys management. It commissioned a study into
the possibilities for improving our businesss sustainable procurement practices. The results were assessed
during a round-table conference with suppliers. The
Results of audits
Most of the 22 processing businesses and suppliers
audited in 2011 achieved sufficient to good scores. In
total, three operators scored insufficient result and
three were classified as No Go. Plans for improvement
have been drawn up with those six businesses, and arrangements have been made about the timing of the
improvements. The businesses with No Go scores are
subject to additional supervision. Our partnerships with
them can only continue once the plans for improvement
have been fully implemented. The results of the audit
process led to us discontinuing our partnership with
one business.
In two instances, Van Gansewinkel Groeps auditors
were involved in performing audits as part of due diligence work.
Information and management systems
Code of conduct
Our business stands or falls with trust, and that trust
has to be earned every day. Our people play an important part here. In 2011, we adopted a code of conduct
that addresses important elements of desirable fair
and honest conduct. The code of conduct describes
not only what conduct is expected from Van Gansewinkel Groeps employees, but also what the employees
may expect from Van Gansewinkel Groep. The code
expands on the policy principles and serves as an
umbrella for other, more specific codes and policy
documents within the Group. The Code of Conduct will
be introduced at the start of 2012.
System-Based Supervision
As part of the System-Based Supervision (Systeemgericht toezicht, SGT) project, supervisory
authorities in the Zeeland and Noord-Brabant Provinces conducted a quick scan in May 2011 to assess
the status of the management system of Van Gansewinkels Southwest Netherlands region. That quick
scan investigated the extent to which the regional
unit is compliant with the items on the compliance
competence checklist that are labelled as essential or
important.
A few improvements were made following an initial
screening, after which the final verification audit was
performed. The results were favourable: we have
been admitted to the SGT systems of both provinces.
In Zeeland Province, we were the first business to be
admitted to SGT.
Contracts will be signed with the authorities of both
provinces in 2012, setting out arrangements between
Van Gansewinkels Southwest Netherlands region and
the provinces. Those arrangements will cover such
matters as how we will monitor our own compliance
with environmental laws and regulations and what
follow-up actions will come into play if we proactively identify any shortcomings. The concept of SGT
is based on mutual trust between businesses and
government authorities. Van Gansewinkels Southeast
Netherlands region had been admitted to SGT previously.
Under the SGT concept, an enforcing authority (for
example the Human Environment and Transport
Inspectorate or the provincial authorities) relies on the
inherent quality of a companys management system.
A proper management system requires various elements, for example internal controls, full registration,
openness and the implementation of improvements. If
that system works properly, a business can monitor for
itself whether it is compliant with laws and regulations.
If any instances of non-compliance are identified, the
business itself can take proper measures to remedy
the situation.
83
5%2%
7%
10%
21%
36%
19%
Image risk
Orderliness & Neatness
Safety
Care system
Acceptance
Permit
CSR
Certifications
2011
2010
2009
ISO 9001
97.4%
85.9%
81.5%
ISO 14001
84.9%
79.4%
79.2%
OHSAS 18001
70.7%
57.1%
21.6%
Compliance
Last year, a total of eight material penalties/sanctions
(higher than 500) were paid for non-compliance with
laws and regulations.
Two instances concerned non-compliance with the
Dutch Working Conditions Act (Arbowet), two instances involved violations of ADR regulations (transport of
hazardous goods), one instance involved non-compliance with the Dutch Driving Hours Decree (Rijtijdenbesluit), one instance concerned a vehicle with an excessive load, one instance concerned the absence of the
correct authorisation for a particular type of waste and
one instance involved an expired fire extinguisher. The
total penalty was 19,711.
The competent authorities imposed five orders for incremental penalties for:
Non-observance of a CO2 emission standard
Non-observance of a maximum duration for inoperational particulate matter sampling
Non-observance of a water emission standard
84
tions are still pending in 2012. Several instances resulted in reports being filed with the police, and in some
cases criminal investigations were conducted. Three
employees were dismissed with immediate effect on
grounds of involvement in instances of non-integrity.
Van Gansewinkel Groep did not receive any complaints
about violations of human rights in 2011.
Integrity
In 2010 we started work on actively giving shape and
substance to the theme of integrity, to further improve
the professionalism of our sustainable development efforts. The appointment of an Integrity Manager to give
further shape and substance to policy, awareness, prevention and research was the starting point in this process. Last year we worked on developing an integrity
policy and drafting a Code of Conduct, Integrity Regulations and an Investigations Protocol. Local integrity
contacts were appointed at the various sites, and the
communication path during integrity-related investigations was formalised. A complaints procedure was
drawn for the manner in which integrity investigations
are conducted. To assist employees, we also developed
an integrity workshop and a training course for dealing
with aggression and violence. These will be rolled out
further in 2012.
The Integrity Manager received 33 reports of non-integrity during the year. Some of those reports came
from within the organisation, while others were made
by individuals and institutions outside the organisation.
The reports concerned one instance of aggression and
violence (internal), 19 instances of crime (primarily
theft), two instances of fraud, two instances of improper
practices with regard to working hours, one instance
of improper use of company assets, four instances of
improper/indecent conduct and four other incidents.
Of the 33 reports, 16 were taken under investigation
and three were forwarded to the HR department as concerning undesirable forms of conduct. For 15 reports,
it was decided that they were to be classified as not requiring investigation. The reasons for that classification
were explained to the parties reporting the incidents,
further advice was issued or the report was forwarded
to another department or organisation. Four investiga-
85
financial
summary
119
(x 1,000)
(x 1,000)
ASSETS
* Notes
31 December 2011
31 December 2010
31 December 2009
Non-current assets
* Notes
31 December 2011
31 December 2010
31 December 2009
10.1
852,535
849,878
881,299
Issued capital
10.14
40
40
40
Goodwill
10.2
826,888
786,409
782,630
Share premium
10.15
574,386
520,636
520,636
10.3
230,204
229,343
242,690
Revaluation reserve
10.16
6,030
4,789
6,732
Investments in associates
10.4
7,028
7,429
6,796
10.17
(20,448)
(392)
10.5
108,421
93,066
95,805
Retained earnings
10.18
(386,539)
(361,843)
(172,881)
10.6
47
5,746
Undistributed result
(29,018)
(25,823)
(190,887)
10.7
2,096
1,.514
1,837
144,451
137,407
163,640
2,027,172
1,967,686
2,016,803
17,436
16,943
15,612
161,887
154,350
179,252
10.20
1,553,635
1,590,071
1,658,032
10.6
25,005
18,251
16,396
10.21
89,596
78,706
83,155
Employee benefits
10.22
10,332
9,037
7,573
Provisions
10.23
115,300
81,455
73,017
1,793,868
1,777,520
1,838,173
10.19
Total equity
Inventories
10.8
23,966
20,333
18,807
10.9
202,177
167,431
162,257
10.6
1,104
5,747
9,162
Other assets
10.10
9,367
9,142
8,359
10.11
124
62
90,400
10.12
132,068
179,554
93,515
368,806
382,269
382,500
2,742
3,735
16,082
371,548
386,004
398,582
2,398,720
2,353,690
2,415,385
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings
Derivative financial instruments
10.13
Current liabilities
Total current assets
Total assets
* The notes refer to the paragraph in the full financial report.
The full financial report is available online (www.annualreportvangansewinkelgroep.com).
Property, plant and equipment increased with 3 million compared to 2010. This increase is caused by investments (investments in 2011 amounted 94 million)
and the acquisition of Veolia Environmental Services
Belgium SA (Veolia), partially offset by depreciation.
The derivatives position decreased because the contracts have a shorter maturity and due to changes in
energy prices.
As a result of the acquisition of Veolia the current assets are increased.
10.24
221,229
191,447
159,578
Borrowings
10.20
64,141
98,631
86,093
10.6
31,846
21,441
29,640
Other provisions
10.23
14,529
23,583
28,594
Other liabilities
10.24
111,220
86,718
94,055
442,965
421,820
397,960
Total liabilities
2,236,833
2,199,340
2,236,133
2,398,720
2,353,690
2,415,385
The loans decreased as a result of redemptions compared to last year (short-term and long-term portion of
the loans together).
120
121
(x 1,000)
* Notes
2011
2010
Revenue
11.1
1,186,267
1,115,094
11.2
(45,579)
(39,276)
Third-party processing
11.3
(273,790)
(241,786)
Third-party maintenance
11.4
(25,007)
(20,834)
11.5
(309,763)
(309,740)
11.6
(168,815)
(158,078)
11.7
(303,816)
(295,649)
59,497
49,731
Operating profit/(loss)
Financial income
11.8
9,260
14,677
Financial expense
11.8
(112,462)
(94,538)
11.9
380
1,111
(43,325)
(29,019)
18,160
7,183
(25,165)
(21,836)
11.10
Attributable to:
Owners of the parent
Non controlling interest
* Notes
2011
2010
(25,165)
(21,836)
(26,741)
(578)
(325)
359
6,685
186
388
(331)
(19,993)
(364)
(45,158)
(22,200)
(49,096)
(26,233)
3,938
4,033
(45,158)
(22,200)
Attributable to:
Owners of the parent
Non controlling interests
260,000
(29,018)
(25,823)
3,853
3,987
(25,165)
(21,836)
250,000
240,000
230,000
220,000
122
210,000
200,000
254,526
EBITDAE
management
accounts
( 20,181)
Normalisations
adjustments
( 5,344)
Unrealised
result
derivates
( 689)
Other
items
228,312
EBITDA
financial
accounts
The normalisations mainly relate to one off costs regarding integration costs related to acquisitions and
mergers of Collection regions (6 million), advisory
costs for various projects (5.8 million) and (insurance-)
claimcosts (5 million).
123
(x 1,000)
(x 1,000)
* Notes
Result before tax
2011
2010
(43,325)
(29,019)
Total
Non
controlling
interests
Total
equity
- (172,881) (190,887)
163,640
15,612
179,252
190,887
(25,823)
(25,823)
3,987
(21,836)
Share
premium
Revaluation
reserve
40
520,636
6,732
(190,887)
Adjustments for:
Balance at 31 December 2009
Retained
earnings
11.6
168,815
158,078
10.22
1,218
1,464
- Change in provisions
10.23
(13,446)
(56)
- Finance income
11.8
(9,260)
(14,677)
- Finance expense
11.8
112,462
94,538
11.9
(380)
(1,111)
Realisation of revaluation
(1,943)
1,943
12.3
5,374
9,177
(578)
(578)
(578)
316
316
43
359
186
(334)
(148)
(145)
(1,943)
(392) (188,962)
165,064
(26,233)
4,033
(22,200)
(2,650)
(2,650)
(De)consolidation
(102)
(102)
50
50
(2,702)
(2,702)
(392) (361,843)
(25,823)
137,407
16,943
154,350
264,783
12,122
13,251
Dividend received
10.4
451
482
(1,023)
(2,138)
Comprehensive income
247,413
11,550
11,595
233,008
229,989
Investments in:
- other intangible assets
10.3
(9,193)
(6,652)
- PP&E
10.1
(93,015)
(69,286)
40
520,636
4,789
7.1
(62,490)
(16,217)
- investments in associates
10.4
(253)
(25,823)
25,823
10.7
(706)
(1,337)
(29,018)
(29,018)
3,853
(25,165)
12.2
13,032
18,124
Realisation of revaluation
(1,149)
1,149
586
(1,078)
(26,741)
(26,741)
(26,741)
(410)
(410)
85
(325)
6,685
388
7,073
7,073
(1,149)
(20,056)
(24,696)
(3,195)
(49,096)
3,938
(45,158)
Capital contribution
53,750
53,750
53,750
Revaluation of participations
2,390
2,390
(95)
2,295
(3,350)
(3,350)
53,750
2,390
56,140
(3,445)
52,695
40
574,386
6,030
(20,448) (386,539)
(29,018)
144,451
17,436
161,887
Comprehensive income
Divestments of:
- PP&E
- group company
- investments in associates
10.4
485
156
10.7
91,405
(151,301)
14,862
(106,686)
(83,192)
38,952
10,928
(112,184)
(83,539)
Capital contribution
SCE
53,750
Dividend paid
SCE
(3,350)
(2,650)
(158,453)
(47,811)
86,398
10.12
179,554
93,515
SCE
325
(359)
10.12
132,068
179,554
Increase/decrease in liquidities
Cash position as at 1 January
Exchange rate differences
Cash position as at 31 December
(129,518)
124
Cash flow
hedge
reserve
Issued
capital
125
The key assumptions used for the value in use calculations are as follows:
Total Company
827
3.0%
1.6%
13.7%
Waste Processing
366
1.3%
1.0%
33.3%
2.7%
1.6%
8.9%
290
3.1%
1.6%
10.0%
2.0%
1.6%
6.3%
88
3.4%
1.6%
13.6%
2.9%
2.0%
12.0%
74
5.7%
1.6%
15.4%
3.8%
1.6%
7.5%
Contaminated Soil
Collection Netherlands
Industrial Services
Goodwill
(x 1,000)
Changes in goodwill are as follows:
Collection BeFraLux
2011
2010
Recycling
Balance as of 1 January
Cost
Accumulated impairments
Carrying value
897,406
893,686
(110,997)
(111,056)
786,409
782,630
40,532
3,693
(53)
86
40,479
3,779
937,885
897,406
(110,997)
(110,997)
826,888
786,409
Changes Year
Goodwill on acquisitions
Exchange rate results
Balance as of 31 December
Cost
Accumulated impairments
Carrying value
126
Collection International
Other
** CAGR = compound annual growth rate
** EBIT = operational result
Amounts x million
plus 1%
minus 1%
0.0
0.0
0.0
39.9
0.0
0.0
127
Debt position
(x 1,000)
The debt position of the company and its consolidated subsidiaries can be broken down as follows:
(x 1,000)
Average
interest
Term
< 1 jaar
Term
1 - 5 jaar
Term
> 5 jaar
Total
31 December
2011
4.9%
47,955
1,498,410
1,546,365
1,636,121
12.5%
29,089
29,089
26,111
Finance leases
5-7%
10,522
32,672
7,541
50,735
24,545
Bank overdrafts
1.1%
10,265
10,265
13,356
Other loans
2.9%
1,992
5,600
1,202
8,794
9,871
70,734
1,565,771
8,743
1,645,248
1,710,004
(6,593)
(20,879)
(27,472)
(21,302)
64,141
1,544,892
8,743
1,617,776
1,688,702
Financial institutions
Preferred shares
Total
31 December
2010
Classification
-
1,544,892
8,743
1,553,635
1,590,071
64,141
64,141
98,631
Balance as of 31 December
64,141
1,544,892
8,743
1,617,776
1,688,702
For further notes on the debt position, please refer to section 10.20 Borrowings in the 2011 financial statements.
The following table provides an overview of the repayment and interest obligations regarding debt.
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
>2016
47,955
68,625
613,609
683,861
132,315
10,522
8,229
8,277
8,175
7,991
7,541
1,992
1,452
1,408
1,378
1,362
1,202
63,434
63,437
71,046
21,083
2,111
1,460
1,180
1,199
1,212
1,187
1,275
217
168
131
97
63
48
125,580
143,091
695,670
715,806
145,029
10,066
31,814
20,968
4,089
157,394
164,059
699,759
715,806
145,029
10,066
0.4%
0.5%
1.8%
1.8%
2.3%
The net revenue is largely generated in the Netherlands in various activities associated with the collection and processing
of waste and directly related activities.
2011
2010
The Netherlands
816,380
820,600
274,265
215,554
95,622
78,940
1,186,267
1,115,094
2011
2010
Waste processing
242,123
276,739
Waste collection
882,587
859,070
Recycling
142,307
108,944
Eliminations
(80,750)
(129,659)
1,186,267
1,115,094
Employees
At 31 December 2011 6,198 FTEs (2010: 5,577 FTEs) were employed by the company and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Broken down by geographic spread, the composition of the workforce by country (based on FTEs) can be represented follows:
31 December 2011
31 December 2010
The Netherlands
3,708
3,645
1,698
1,212
792
720
6,198
5,577
Other countries
Executive directors
Salaries
Social charges
Pension charges
Total
CEO
626
11
249
886
CFO
356
10
63
429
COO
279
52
340
Y.W.A. Luca
COO
279
81
77
437
1,540
111
441
2,092
* The average reference interest rate is the EURIBOR used for the calculations above.
128
129
This is our fifth integrated financial and sustainability report. This is a translation of the jaarverslag 2011 in the Dutch language. In case of discrepancies the Dutch version prevails. The report
details our vision, strategy and policy relating to
sustainable development and reports on our activities in 2011 (01/01/2011 to 31/12/2011). This
report is approved by the Board of Directors and
Supervisory Board. In preparing the report, Van
Gansewinkel Groep follows the Global Reporting
Initiative (GRI) guidelines.
Scope
130
Selection of subjects
Data collection
131
GRI-table
Indicator
Description
Page
6-7
1.2
76-81
2.1
Cover
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
Legal form
2.7
Markets
2.8
2.9
Organisational changes
2.10
Cover
34-35
2
14-37
Awards
75
Reporting period
130-131
3.2
130-131
3.3
Reporting cycle
130-131
3.4
3.5
130-131
3.6
130-131
3.7
Limit delineation
130-131
3.8
130-131
3.9
130-131
3.10
130-131
3.11
130-131
3.12
Management disclosures
133-139
3.13
130-131
Cover
Management structure*
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
* The GRI table outlines which GRI indicators are reported in the Annual Report 2011 and where they can be found in the report. Some indicators are
marked with an asterisk (*). Those marked with an asterisk are partially covered in the report. Other indicators are fully covered, unless otherwise stated.
132
133
GRI-table
GRI-table
Indicator
Description
4.8
4.9
DMA
DMA
36-38, 82-85
DMA
Compliance
DMA
Transport*
DMA
Overall
36-38
EN1
Weight of materials
54-57
EN2
54-57
EN3
EN4
4.11
Precaution principles
4.12
4.13
Membership of associations
4.14
70-75
4.15
70-75
4.16
13, 44
13
36-38
Energy
Economic performance
54-62, 98-109
EN7
54-62, 98-109
EN8
61
3, 63-69, 119-129
EN9
61
EN10
n/a
EN11
60
EN12
60
EN13
EN14
EN15
EN16
58-62
EN17
60-62
EN18
54-62
EN19
60-62
EN20
NOx, SOx, and other significant air emissions by type and weight
EN21
61-62
55-57
31, 55
76-81
EC3
n/a
EC4
EC5
Range of ratios of standard entry level wage compared to local minimum wage at significant locations of operation*
EC6
Policy, practices, and proportion of spending on locally-based suppliers at significant locations of operation*
82-85
EC7
43-45
EC8
33
Biodiversity
70-75, 119
EC2
EC9
42
n/a
33, 70-75
Environmental indicators
EN22
15-29
EN23
Energy
15, 22-33
EN24
DMA
Water*
36-38, 60-61
DMA
Biodiversity*
DMA
Materials
DMA
59
EN6
DMA
Market footprint
61, 101
14-35
36-38, 58
EN5
Market presence
EC1
36-38, 76-81, 84
DMA
Economic perfomances
Management disclosures
Materials
70-75, 78,
142-143
Water
**DMA
Page
41, 142-143
Economic indicators
Management disclosures
Description
Environmental indicators
4.10
4.17
Indicator
Page
54-62
n/a
60
n/a
61
60
55-57
36-38, 60
134
135
GRI-table
GRI-table
Indicator
Description
Environmental indicators
Compliance
Indicator
Page
EN25
EN26
Initiatives to mitigate environmental impacts of products and services, and extent of impact mitigation
EN27
54-57
EN28
Monetary value of significant fines and total number of non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with environmental laws and
regulations
62, 84
58-60
EN29
Overall
EN30
n/a
LA11
42, 44
52-62, 97-109
LA12
42, 44
LA13
LA14
DMA
DMA
Non-discrimination
36-38, 85
DMA
36-38, 44
DMA
Child labor
36-38, 82-85
DMA
36-38, 82-85
DMA
Security practices
n/a
DMA
Indigenous rights
n/a
DMA
Assessment
n/a
DMA
Remediation
36-38
Management disclosures
62
DMA
Employment
DMA
Labor/management relations
DMA
21, 48-51
DMA
21, 40-42
DMA
36-38, 43
DMA
36-38, 44
Occupational health
and safety
136
HR1
HR2
HR3
n/a
LA2
Net employment*
44
LA3
44
Return and retention after parental leave, divided by men and women*
50
LA4
44
Non-discrimination
HR4
44
82-85
Freedom of association
and collective bargaining
HR5
LA5
LA6
Percentage of total workforce represented in formal joint management-worker health and safety committees that help monitor and
advise on occupational health and safety programs*
44-47
Child labor
HR6
82-85
LA7
48-50
HR7
82-85
LA8
Education, training, counseling, prevention, and risk-control programs in place to assist workforce members, their families, or community members regarding serious diseases
49-51
Security practices
HR8
n/a
Indigenous rights
HR9
n/a
Assessment
HR10
n/a
Remediation
HR11
LA10
43-45
36-38, 82-83
LA9
44
LA1
LA15
Labor/management
relations
43-45, 144-145
Human rights
Working conditions
Employment
Page
Working conditions
Transport
Management disclosures
Description
36-38, 45-47
42
85
n/a
83
85
137
GRI-table
GRI-table
Indicator
Description
Society
Management disclosures
Community
DMA
Local communities
DMA
Corruption
DMA
Public policy
n/a
DMA
Anti-competitive behavior
n/a
DMA
Compliance
SO1
SO10
36-37
Page
PR5
Practices related to customer satisfaction, including results of surveys measuring customer satisfaction
PR6
n/a
PR7
n/a
Customer privacy
PR8
84
Compliance
PR9
84
36-37, 84
Marketing communications
36-37, 84
70-75
SO2
84-85
SO3
n/a
SO4
SO5
75
SO6
75
Anti-competitive behavior
SO7
Compliance
SO8
Monetary value of significant fines and total number of non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with laws and regulations
DMA
DMA
n/a
DMA
Marketing communications
n/a
DMA
Customer privacy*
DMA
Compliance
Public policy
Description
Product liability
SO9
Corruption
Indicator
Page
65-66
84-85
n/a
84
Product liability
Management disclosures
138
PR1
Life cycle stages in which health and safety impacts of products and
services are assessed for improvement, and percentage of significant
products and services categories subject to such procedures*
PR2
PR3
PR4
36-37
36-37
84
48-51
84
36-37
84
139
INDEPENDENT
ASSURANCE REPORT
To the readers of the Integrated financial and sustainability report 2011 of Van Gansewinkel Groep.
Our engagement was designed to provide limited assurance on whether the information in the chapters
Organisation and formalisation of sustainable development, People, Planet, Stakeholder dialogue, Sustainable supply chain management and the paragraph
Customer satisfaction within the chapter Profit in
the Report of the Board of Directors (hereinafter: the
Sustainability information) is, in all material respects,
fairly stated in accordance with the reporting criteria.
Procedures performed to obtain a limited level of assurance are aimed at determining the plausibility of
data and are less extensive than those for a reasonable
level of assurance. We do not provide any assurance on
the achievability of objectives, expectations and ambitions of Van Gansewinkel.
We have also reviewed, to the extent of our competence, whether information on sustainability in the
other chapters of the Integrated financial and sustain-
140
information;
Review of the design and implementation of systems and processes for information management
and processing, including the aggregation of data
included in the Sustainability information;
Collecting and reviewing internal and external
documentation to determine whether the Sustainability information in The Report is supported by
sufficient evidence;
Determining whether the information in the other
sections of The Report is consistent with the Sustainability information;
Assessing the reasonableness of the assumptions
underlying the forward-looking statements set out
in the Sustainability information;
A n evaluation of whether the Sustainability
information is in line with our overall knowledge
of, and experience with, sustainability at Van
Gansewinkel.
M.J.A. Verhoeven RA
141
Biographies of the
Biographies of the
Board of Directors
Supervisory Board
CEO
COO
Y. Luca (1965)
CFO
COO
Directorships/additional roles:
Member of the Supervisory Board of Wings of Support, an
organisation helping children with shelter and education in
those countries which are KLM and Martinair destinations
Board member of WENb, an employers organisation covering
energy, cable & telecom, waste & environment
Current position:
Partner CVC Capital Partners, Netherlands
Nationality: Dutch
Appointed on: 1 March 2006
Hugo van Berckel is a partner at CVC Capital Partners. Before he started working at CVC Capital Partners in 1999, he
held various positions at, among others ABN AMRO bank and
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines. Hugo vanBerckel studied law at
the University of Leiden and holds a Master degree of Business Administration from INSEAD, Fontainebleau. He holds
directorships at Koninklijke Volker Wessels Stevin, Raet NV
and C1000.
Directorships/additional roles:
Vice Chairman, Association of Waste Companies (Vereniging
van Afvalbedrijven)
Member of the Supervisory Board of Van Loon specialist meat
company
142
Carel van den Driest studied business economics at the University of Groningen. After graduation he worked at, amongst
others, Shell in The Hague and Brunei and after that at the
Rotterdam shipping and harbour company Van Ommeren. At
Van Ommeren he held several executive positions, ultimately
joining the Board and as Chairman from 1991 to 1999. In
2000, Van den Driest transferred to ECT, holding the post
of Chairman of the Board. In 2002, he became Chairman of
the Board of Koninklijke Vopak, a position he held until late
2005.
R. Gorenflos (1961)
Current position:
CEO of Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V.
Nationality: Dutch
Appointed on: 1 April 2009
Current position:
Partner Kohlberg Kravis Roberts LLP, London, United Kingdom
Nationality: German
Appointed on: 1 March 2006
Reinhard Gorenflos is a partner at KKR. Since his appointment in 2001, he has played a leading role in the investments
in AVR, Van Gansewinkel, Duales System Deutschland
(DSD), FL Selenia, MTU Aero Engines, Demag, Zumtobel, and
Legrand. Gorenflos is also a member of the Portfolio Management Committee and the Infrastructure Investment Committee. He studied economics at the University of Freiburg in
Germany and has a Masters in Public Administration, John
McCloy Academic Scholar of the School of Government at Harvard University (USA).
143
Glossary of terms
Accident without absence An alternative-duties incident or a medical-treatment accident. See also: alternativeduties incident and medical-treatment incident
Alternative-duties incident An incident that causes damage to an individuals health that prevents that individual
from carrying out the full set of duties normally assigned to him or her. The employee
starts performing the alternative duties on the first working day following the incident.
BEC
Biomass Power Plant (Dutch: biomassa energie centrale)
Biomass
Biodegradable fraction of products, waste and residues
Capex
Investments (capital expenditures)
CEE
Central and Eastern Europe, in this context Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary
CEO
Chief Executive Officer
CFC
Chlorofluorocarbon
CFO
Chief Financial Officer
CO2
Carbon Dioxide (greenhouse gas)
Combustible waste Household and commercial waste that is delivered to the incineration plants in Rozenburg and Duiven, or that is collected by Van Gansewinkel and delivered to incineration
plants of third parties
COO
Chief Operations Officer
cradle-to-cradle The central concept of cradle-to-cradle is that waste is food. Every material, once spent,
should be reused as the same or another product. It should not lose quality and all
residual products must be capable of being reused or be environmentally neutral. This
completes the cycle .... and waste is food. cradle-to-cradle is a registered trademark
of McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry
CVC Capital CVC Capital Partners is an international private equity firm and one of Van Gansewinkel
Groeps shareholders
Design for recycling Design for recycling means that products are designed in such a way that they can be
completely reused based on the cradle-to-cradle principle. The raw materials are carefully chosen and combined to allow them to be reused for the same purpose or function
Downcycling Downcycling appears when a recycled raw material is no longer of the purity of the
original raw material and the material quality has degraded
EBIT Earnings Before Interest and Taxes
EBITDAE Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Amortisation and Exceptional Items
Economic raw materials scarcity Economic raw materials scarcity arises in the market for raw materials as a result in
shifts in supply and demand. The availability of raw materials is an important factor
in price movements in the market
EMS Employee Motivation Survey
EPEA Environmental Protection and Encouragement Agency EPEA assists Van Gansewinkel
Groep in applying the cradle-to-cradle principle
Fatality An incident that causes damage to an individuals health that is sufficiently severe to
cause that individual to die within 30 days of continual absence following the incident,
if the injury sustained is part of the cause of death
First-aid incident A once-only treatment and/or observation of minor scrapes, cuts, burns, splinters etc.
that do not require medical treatment by a doctor. This treatment or observation is
also termed first aid even if conducted by a doctor or by a professional registered with
a hospital. The incident may not result in different work or absence
Footprint In the context of this report, this refers to the CO2 footprint. The CO2 footprint indicates
the amount of CO2 that an organisation emits as a result of its activities and is a form
of pollution index
FORZ Secondary building material of the A&G subsidiary
Frequency level Number of incidents involving absence x 100,000, divided by the number of exposure
hours. The frequency level refers to both employees and external workers
FTE
Full-Time Equivalent, equates to employees with a full-time contract
Guarantees of Origin Guarantees of Origin provide information about how electricity is produced. They prove
that the electricity was generated using sustainable methods. Guarantees of Origin
represent green energy and can make companies and institutions energy consumption sustainable
Geopolitical scarcity Geopolitical scarcity emerges if raw materials that are becoming scarcer are used as
economic and political weapons
144
GRI Global Reporting Initiative. Van Gansewinkel Groeps sustainability report is based
on the Global Reporting Initiative, version 3.1. G3 distinguishes different application
levels, from C to A. Van Gansewinkel Groep reports on many of the GRI key indicators
and is transparent about its sustainability activities. PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V. has verified the report, giving it an A+ level
GWh
Gigawatt hour (1,000 MWh (megawatt hours) or 1 million kWh (kilowatt hours)
Hazardous waste Waste that is classified as hazardous according to the European List of Waste (marked
with an asterisk (*)). This also includes chemical and hazardous household waste, such
as paint waste, batteries, solvents, toners and medicine residues
ISO 9001
International standard for quality management systems
ISO 14001
International standard for environmental management systems
KKR Kohlberg Kravis & Roberts; KKR is a private equity firm and one of Van Gansewinkel
Groeps shareholders
Kton
Kiloton
Lean Six Sigma A quality management method for improving an organisations operational achievements by identifying deficiencies in and making improvements to that organisations
work processes
Level Playing Field
A metaphor for a market in which the same rules apply to each and every operator
Medical-treatment incident An incident involving injury, not being a time-lost incident or a different-work incident,
for which treatment may only be administered by a doctor or medical specialist. Medical treatment does not include first-aid treatment
Mtons
Megaton
MWh
Megawatt hour
Near miss An unplanned event or series of events that did not result in injury, sickness or damage,
but that might have
NGO Non-governmental organisation
Non-ferro A non-ferrous metal is a metal that contains no iron and that does not have iron alloys
as its main component (for example copper, aluminium, zinc, bronze and brass)
NVMP Nederlandse Verwijdering Metalektro Producten
OHSAS 18001 International standard and management system for ensuring health and safety in the
workplace
Physical raw materials scarcity The tangible and actual amount of raw materials in the world or in a particular area
R1 status Recovery plant. Having been awarded R1 status makes it easier for waste incinerators to import waste from abroad. These plants must be compliant with the applicable
standards
Renewables
Renewable raw materials
Severity rate Number of working days lost x 1,000 divided by the exposure hours. The severity rate
refers to both employees and external workers
SHEQ Safety, Health, Environment and Quality
SWOT Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats
TCI Thermal Conversion Plant (Dutch: Thermische Conversie Installatie)
TJ Terrajoule
Time-lost accident An accident that causes damage to an individuals health that prevents that individual
from starting his or her own duties or alternative duties on the first working day following the incident
Trackwise Trackwise is an electronic management system supporting the organisation that registers and monitors SHEQ-related items, for example incidents and near misses, inspections, audits, sanctions and surveys
Upcycling Upcycling means that the recycled raw material attains a higher level of purity than
that of the original raw material
Urban mining
Retrieving and extracting valuable raw materials from unwanted products
Waste Framework Directive EC Directive on the handling and disposal of waste, currently being implemented in
the Member States
WEEE
Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment
145
Colophon
Concept, design and production
credo.creatie, Eindhoven
Printing and finishing
De Budelse
Photography
Clea Betlem
Imagebank Van Gansewinkel Groep
Typefaces
BentonSans, Corporate
Paper
Steinbeis Charisma Silk
Revive Natural White
Concept, coordination and editorial
Fredericke van Blotenburg
Jacqueline van Druten - de Wit
Geert DHaese
Frank Janssen
Tim Kezer
Gertwin Klomp
Bart Nevels
Natasja van Rompaey - de Vaal
Jurriaan Spoel
Hendrik van de Vijver
Advice
C&F Report
For more information
Internet
www.vangansewinkelgroep.com
e-mail
info@vangansewinkel.com
Corporate Communications,
Eindhoven
+31 40 751 40 00
146