Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
14,
2016
The
Honorable
Thomas
K.
Norment,
Jr.
Senate
Majority
Leader
Post
Office
Box
6205
Williamsburg,
VA
23188
Dear
Senator
Norment:
I
am
receipt
of
your
letter
of
September
9,
2016.
I
would
like
to
extend
my
appreciation
to
you
and
the
members
of
the
respective
subcommittees
for
focusing
on
the
legality
of
the
University
of
Virginia's
$2.3
billion
fund,
and
I
hope
you
will
also
agree
that
transparency
and
integrity
are
at
the
very
heart
of
the
publics
trust.
But
the
issue
has
never
been
the
legality
of
the
fund.
Instead,
the
issues
have
always
been
that
the
Universitys
administration
disguised
the
money,
had
private
conversations
with
just
a
handful
of
the
Board
of
Visitors'
leadership
about
how
to
spend
public
money
and
the
investment
income
off
of
this
public
money,
and
convinced
the
Board
to
go
along
with
its
plans
in
an
illegal
closed
session
while
simultaneously
instructing
members
to
keep
them
a
secret
from
us
and
the
public.
I
am
not
looking
at
this
from
a
rarified
perspective.
Instead,
what
I
know
comes
from
spending
years
as
an
Intelligence
Officer
with
Naval
Special
Warfare
and
at
Naval
Investigative
Service.
And
as
it
relates
to
the
University
of
Virginias
missteps
and
efforts
by
its
leadership
to
cover
its
tracks,
you
have
been
misled.
Rector
Bill
Goodwin
has
been
far
less
than
candid
over
the
course
of
numerous
conversations,
Ive
been
given
the
run-around
by
President
Terry
Sullivan,
and
plainly
told
by
Pat
Hogan,
the
Universitys
chief
operating
officer,
that
whats
gone
on
is
none
of
my
business.
Unfortunately
for
them,
it
is.
It
is
for
all
of
us
legislators
who
are
charged
with
keeping
a
careful
eye
on
the
publics
wallet.
Worse
for
them,
I
have
documentation
and
accounts
from
a
wide
range
of
sourcesincluding
many
board
membersthat
for
whatever
reason,
Virginias
leadership
and
citizens
have
been
led
astray.
And
if
the
law
has
not
been
broken,
certainly
its
spirit
has
been
crushed.
Senator
Thomas
K.
Norment,
Jr.
September
14,
2016
Page
2
As
others
have
observed,
there
are
obviously
philosophical
differences
about
the
best
use
of
$2.3
billion
and
the
investment
income
generated
off
of
those
funds
that
we
can
discuss
at
length,
and
hope
we
will.
I
was
glad
to
learn
today
that
the
House
Appropriations
Committee
will
be
pressing
the
University
to
enhance
its
plans
to
better
serve
the
needs
of
Virginians
when
it
comes
to
an
affordable
degree.
I
hope
the
Senate
will
join
in
that
effort.
At
the
same
time,
I
take
it
as
a
personal
affront
that
anyone
or
any
agency
accountable
to
the
General
Assembly
and
the
publicand
university
presidents
and
members
of
a
Board
of
Visitors
certainly
arewould
have
the
audacity
to
dictate
terms
and
rules
advantageous
to
them,
but
not
to
the
people
we
have
been
chosen
to
serve.
Nor
should
anyone
dismiss
the
unwise
precedent
that
such
a
diminution
of
legislative
authority
sets
and
the
impact
it
would
have
on
bureaucratic
accountability
across
all
agencies.
Moreover,
Virginias
code
does
not
provide
for
a
firewall
that
the
University
of
Virginia
can
hide
behind
when
it
suits
their
purpose.
Warmest
regards,
Bill
DeSteph
th
Senator,
8
District